ArticlePDF Available

Figures

Content may be subject to copyright.
78
Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at
http://hrmars.com/index.php/pages/detail/publication-ethics
Technology Adoption and Employee’s Job Performance: An
Empirical Investigation
Shathees Baskaran, Ho Sze Lay, Beh Sze Ming and Nomahaza Mahadi
To Link this Article: http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJAREMS/v9-i1/7443 DOI: 10.6007/IJAREMS/v9-i1/7443
Received: 25 Jan 2020, Revised: 26 Feb 2020, Accepted: 20 Mar 2020
Published Online: 29 Apr 2020
In-Text Citation: (Baskaran et al., 2020)
To Cite this Article: Baskaran, S., Lay, H. S., Ming, B. S., & Mahadi, N. (2020). Technology Adoption and
Employee’s Job Performance: An Empirical Investigation. International Journal of Academic Research in
Economics and Managment and Sciences, 9(1), 78105.
Copyright: © 2020 The Author(s)
Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute,
translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full
attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen
at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode
Vol. 9, No. 1, 2020, Pg. 78 - 105
http://hrmars.com/index.php/pages/detail/IJAREMS
JOURNAL HOMEPAGE
International Journal of Academic Research economics and management sciences
Vol. 9 , No. 1, 2020, E-ISSN: 2226-3624 © 2020 HRMARS
Technology Adoption and Employee’s Job
Performance: An Empirical Investigation
Shathees Baskaran, Ho Sze Lay, Beh Sze Ming and Nomahaza
Mahadi
Azman Hashim International Business School Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Malaysia
Email: shathees@utm.my, szelay0809@gmail.com, bill_cc@hotmail.com,
nomahaza.kl@utm.my
Abstract
Technology innovation has an important influence on employee’s job performance where it helps
to reduce human error, increase productivity, and increase the speed of communication. Many
organizations are facing difficulties in choosing suitable technology adoption strategies with the
hope to improve efficiency and enhance employee performance to be competitive in the market.
Hence, the purpose of this research is to investigate the relationship between technology
adoption drivers and employee job performance in the Malaysian Manufacturing Industry.
Several dimensions for employee job performance were considered in this research namely job
stress, motivation, and workload. In addition, the mediating effect of perceived job insecurity
was also evaluated on the relationship between technology adoption and employee job
performance. Employing a quantitative research method, data was collected from 370
respondents through a structured online survey questionnaire. The findings indicated that job
satisfaction and motivation to be statistically significant while the workload was failed to be
retained in the research. Additionally, there was no statistical evidence for the mediating effect
of job insecurity in the research. It is envisaged that these findings will provide incremental
insights into the existing body of knowledge while providing some directions to the organization
in determining the right set of drivers inculcating technology adoption for improved job
performance.
Keywords: Technology Adoption, Job Performance, Job Stress, Motivation, Workload, Perceived
Job Insecurity.
Introduction
Technologies have been undergoing a drastic transformation over time, there is always new
creations and innovation that appear in the market. Our life has been tied with technologies since
our born, from the technologies and machines used in hospitals to the smartwatches on our
hand, technologies have become one of the most essential things in our life. The reason for the
high acceptance of technologies in an organization is because technology is one of the most
International Journal of Academic Research economics and management sciences
Vol. 9 , No. 1, 2020, E-ISSN: 2226-3624 © 2020 HRMARS
significant elements that related to effective operations management in an organization (Ahmad,
2014). According to Odeh (2019), business transparency and efficiency is found to increase when
there is a use of technology in the organization. With the advance and dynamic growth of
technologies, how fast the consumers are accepting these technologies depends on a number of
factors such as availability of technology, convenience, consumers’ adoption of new technologies
(Meuter, Ostrom, Roundtree, & Bitner, 2000). As a result, this research will present the study of
technology acceptance models and theories leading to the effects on employee’s performance.
In this study, we will focus on research based on the manufacturing industry. The reason for
choosing manufacturing industry as our main focus is that manufacturing industry is heavily
attached to technologies, for example, a competitive medicine manufacturing industry is one of
the manufacturers who invented some new advance technologies that can help increase the
efficiency of production and decrease the total production cost, the company will become the
leader in the medical manufacturing industry. As a result, the manufacturing industry will be the
best choice for understanding the technology adoption model.
Technology has become extremely important to every job in the work environment, it helps to
reduce human errors, increase efficiency, and increase the speed of communication. Many of the
organization are facing issue or problem on selecting the right technology adoption strategies to
adopt in the organization as they are concerned on how the technology can help improve
efficiency and productivity, as well as enhancing the employee performance, in order to be
competitive ahead of others. From the employee perspective, they are concerned on would their
job being replaced by technology advancement. In the past, most of the public perceived that
technology will take over the human job in the future, hence it creates a negative perception to
the public that the purpose of technology creation is to replace human jobs. While on the other
hand, some people believed that, the existence of technology is to lead the human to another
level that life becomes more efficient and convenient.
The major problems faced by the employee in a manufacturing company are the adoption of
technology creating job stress to the worker, as they perceived that technology will take over
their current job. Other than that, the process of adopting new technology in an organization will
create many problems for worker’s day-to-day processes, as they have to accommodate and
force to use new technology in their task, the learning cost of new technology will be much higher
at the beginning.
Based on past research, there is very limited research related to technology adoption in an
organization affecting the employee’s job performance and leads to job insecurity. However,
some researchers notice there is a relationship between these variables. As mentioned by
Hampel and Martinsons (2009), adopting new technology will change the organizational policies
and strategies. In most of the organization, the challenges they faced is generated by the
advanced technology, competition in the industry, improving employee efficiency, new
leadership, and management (Madsen et al., 2005). Much research has shown that employee
behaviors and attitudes need to be developed in order to enhance organizational performance
(Bernerth, 2004). It is important to investigate the adoption of technology by the employee
within the organizations. This is because if there is no acceptance among the employees, the
desired outcome or benefit of technology adaptation would not be realized and the organization
may have to evacuate technology (Talukder, 2012). Most of the time, people tend to resist or
refuse new changes unless they can be convinced that the changes can benefit them (Ajzen,
International Journal of Academic Research economics and management sciences
Vol. 9 , No. 1, 2020, E-ISSN: 2226-3624 © 2020 HRMARS
1991). Therefore, the organization needs to motivate the employees to accept the changes and
adopt the new technology, where the organization should give either intrinsic or extrinsic
motivation to employees for better performance (Dauda & Akingbade, 2011).
According to Imran, Maqbool, and Shafique (2014), the adoption of new technology will enhance
employee performance when they use technology for the benefit of the organization with ethical
value. He further explained that the advancement of technology helps to reduce the workload of
the employees and human effort. It is clear that advanced technology helps to reduce manpower
in the manufacturing industry but there is some problem associated with advanced technology.
First, technostress is one of the factors that will reduce the employee’s performance and it will
contribute a high level of job insecurity. Technostress occurs when an employee is lacking the
need for skills and competencies to performing the task. It can be defined as an individual
adaptation of the reaction exceed the psychological and physical demands (Park & Im, 2012).
Other than that, technostress may lead to job insecurity where the employee is fear or anxious
about losing their job or being replaced by the new adopt technology (Ho-Jin, & Cho, 2016). Thus,
the organization needs to study what are the most suitable technology need to adopt before
implementing it.
In discussing the significance of this study, it is envisaged that the manufacturing industry could
gain some insights to understand the behavior of the employee when adopting new technology
into the workplace. In addition, the manufacturing industry will be able to understand how to
utilize the technology acceptance model to evaluate the effects on the workplace by using
perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use to measure the relationship of technology affects
employee’s job performance, job stress, workload, and work motivation. Other than that, the
study also helps organizations to understand whether it is worthwhile to adopt new technology
in the workplace without increasing the stress levels of workers, decrease the workload, and
encourage employees to work more efficiently.
The research aimed to investigate the relationship between technologies adoption strategies in
the Malaysian manufacturing industry that affecting the employee’s job performance. In this
research, the researcher has chosen a number of factors that can affect job performance such as
stress, motivation, and workload. The mediating effect for this research will be job insecurity that
acts as a factor that influences the motivation of the employee in the organization and employee
job insecurity will be influenced by the technology adoption in the organization. Thus, this
research aims to achieve the following objective: i. determine the relationship between
technologies adoption strategies and employee’s job performances (and related dimensions) and
ii. determine the mediating effect of perceived job insecurity on the relationship between
technologies adoption and employee’s job performance.
Literature Review
Technology and Workplace
In recent research, most of the research emphasis on organizations should motivate employees
to increase the adoption rate of technology in the organization (Talukder, 2012). Besides, based
on Imran et al. (2014), the employee’s performance will be influenced by technological
advancement. Most of the studies have repeatedly proved that appropriate technology adoption
will have a positive relationship with the employee’s performance. However, the organization
should motive employees by providing training and skill development activities, so that
International Journal of Academic Research economics and management sciences
Vol. 9 , No. 1, 2020, E-ISSN: 2226-3624 © 2020 HRMARS
employees can rapidly acquire new knowledge and competencies that require by advanced
technology. Some researchers also mentioned that the implementation of advanced technology
within the organization will create technostress to the organization members. (Ho-Jin, & Cho,
2016). Technostress occurs when the employee has a low level of skill and knowledge to perform
the task which will have a significant influence on job performance and productivity, as well as
role stress. Through the prior research, the cause of technostress will directly influence the
achievement of the organization (Im & Han, 2013).
Apart from that, there is some contrast to the employee workload after adopting new
technology. Most of the researches mentioned that workload could be reduced through the
adoption of advanced technology where the employee can perform their task without any
hurdle. However, there is some researchers believe that technology will make individuals carry
out more tasks within a short period as their superior will require them to provide more
necessary data. Besides, all these factors will lead an individual to experience a high level of job
insecurity where they are anxious about their job will be replaced by technology. According to
the world economic forum, more than a million jobs will be affected by the advanced technology
in the next 5 to 10 years. The research is then proving that nearly half (49%) of the people are
believing that their job is insecure due to the emerging of new technology. Thus, this research
will further investigate the relationship between technology adoption and employee
performance as well as the mediating factor of perceived job insecurity.
Technology Adoption
Both individuals and organizations tend to adopt new technology when there are some potential
benefits that could increase their market competitiveness. Technology adoption is defined as the
choice or decision, by individual or organization, to acquire and implement a new innovation
technology. In the growing technology needs environment and increasing failures of technology
adoption in the organization, a reliable behavior predicting tool has become an interesting topic
for many companies. The adoption of technology not only depend on organizational strategies,
policies, and action, but it also relies on the employee’s attitude. Nevertheless, technology
adoption requires strong managerial efforts and commitments in the organization (Achieng &
Jagero, 2014). Hence, organizations require to provide sufficient facilitating conditions such as
technology and resource support which would eventually influence them on using new
technology. Generally, people tend to resists or refuse to adopt the changes, unless they can be
convinced that the changes are beneficial to them. However, many studies are failed to carry out
reliable behavior measures that help to explain technology acceptance or rejection (Davis, 1989).
Davis (1989) proposes that user motivation can be explained by 3 factors: Perceived Usefulness
(PU), Perceived Ease of Use (PEU), and attitude toward using the technology. In his proposal,
attitude-behavior towards technology is the main factor that determines whether the user will
actually adopt or reject technology.
In addition, the important factors that affect the attitude are perceived usefulness and perceived
ease of use (Swanson, 1982). Perceived usefulness is defined as user perceived that the function
of the adopting technology helps to improve or enhance their job performance (Schultz & Slevin,
1975). Perceived ease of use is defined as the user-perceived learning for using particular
technology shall be effortless (Tornatzky & Klein, 1982). The success of the technology
International Journal of Academic Research economics and management sciences
Vol. 9 , No. 1, 2020, E-ISSN: 2226-3624 © 2020 HRMARS
acceptance model has become a very popular study cited in most of the research that studies the
user acceptance of technology (Lee, Kozar & Larsen, 2003). On the other hand, some researchers
claim that the technology acceptance model is much easy and quick research, so it does not give
enough attention to the real problem of technology acceptance (Lee, Kozar & Larsen, 2003).
Although technology acceptance model has been very popular among researchers, there is a
limitation that happened to the model, as researchers pointed out that self-reported data is a
subjective measure, so it is unreliable in measuring the actual use of technology (Legris, Ingham
& Collerette, 2013, Yousafzai, Foxall, & Pallister 2007). On the side note, in real-life cases, the
majority of organizations usually have little choices of alternative technology available for users
to test out (Lee at al., 2003). Moreover, Bagozzi (2007) argued that the technology acceptance
model may not have the ability to represent the actual usage, because the time between
intention and adoption is full of uncertainties that may influence an individual’s decision on
adopting a technology.
Employee Job Performance
Based on the Motowidlo, Borman, and Schmidt (1997), job performance can be defined as the
total expected quality and value in a particular job from an employee’s behaviors carried over a
standard period of time. There are two distinct dimensions of work behaviors in job performance
which are contextual (citizenship) performance and task performance (Kahya, 2009). Contextual
performance is described as the employee’s effort that is not directly related to their main job
function but their efforts are important as they support the organizational, social, and
psychological environment that serves as the critical catalyst for job activities and processes
(Werner, 2000). Whereas, the task performance is defined as the employee perform the job
activities are formally recognized as part of their jobs and the activities that will be contributed
to the organization (Borman & Motowidlo, 1993). According to Witt, Kacmar, Carlson, and
Zivnuska (2002), contextual performance produces a competitive advantage for organizations
than task performance.
Besides, job performance can also be defined as the individual behaviors that performed
activities or tasks to achieve the organization’s goal and objective (Motowidlo, Borman, &
Schmidt, 1997). It is an important factor that will be affecting the profitability of the organization
where inefficient job performance will destruct the overall organization productivity,
profitability, and effectiveness. Other than that, Employee’ job performance is significant for the
organization as their performance and contribution will lead the business toward success, as well
as achieve competitive advantages. Performances are also important for individuals as the
accomplishment of a job and performing tasks at a high level can be a source of satisfaction
(Muchhal, 2014). The employee who is low performance and fails to achieve organizational goals
might be experienced as dissatisfaction or personal failure. There might be exceptions for those
high performers as they will have a better career opportunity and get promoted more easily
within the organization than the low performers (Van Scotter, Motowidlo, & Cross, 1996).
The employee’s job performance can be affected by numerous factors in their working
environment. Based on some researchers and practitioners, performances of employees at the
workplace may affect by various factors which can be the change of job function, exclusive
nature, systematic technology development, or weakening in job satisfaction (Saeed, Mussawar,
International Journal of Academic Research economics and management sciences
Vol. 9 , No. 1, 2020, E-ISSN: 2226-3624 © 2020 HRMARS
Lodhi, Iqbal, Nayab, & Yaseen, 2013). There are certain factors that individually and collectively
affect employees either enhance or lower their job performance.
Job Stress
Stress is a state of physical, mental, or emotional strain or tension resulting from adverse or a
condition of feeling experienced by an individual perceived demand to exceed personal
endurance. The term job stress can be described as a group of harmful emotional and physical
responses that occur when the requirements of the job go beyond their capabilities, resources
or needs of the employees (French, 1975). The researcher supports the idea that the higher the
imbalance between the job demands and the personal capabilities and abilities, the higher the
job stress experiences by the individual (Jamal, 2005), which simultaneously fails to satisfy the
top management. In other words, job stress can be an awareness indicated by conflict, ambiguity,
and overload that occur from the work environment and the characteristic of individuals.
According to Mizuno, Yamada, Ishii, and Tanaka (2006), job stress has been known as a universal
social problem which combines the two factors of disrupt employees psychologically and
physically, as well as affect their health (Conway, Campanini, Sartori, Dotti, & Costa, 2008). There
are much research has been conducted on the effect of job stress in terms of medical
perspectives such as sleep disorder, heart disease, gastroenteritis, and others that will lower
employee job performance, increase the rate of employee absences, and also job displacement
(Poissonnet & Veron, 2000). However, based on the Japanese management rules, the
effectiveness of the organization depends on the top management or the leader’s ability to drive
the power of stress in themselves and employees, and transform the stress into energy for
success.
Based on the researches, job stress can be categorized into two types (Rizwan, Waseem, &
Bukhari, 2014). The first type is positive stress, where the stress is beneficial when the employee
feel challenged as the stress will be an opportunity for the employee to increase their job
performance and shift the stress into energy to achieve their goal. According to Zafar, Ali,
Hameed, Ilyas, and Younas (2015), setting a reasonable level of stress on employees can help to
enhance the employee’s performance. This is because the stress will motivate employees to work
hardly and effectively, in order to achieve the organization's goals. Thus, there is a positive
relationship between job performance and job stress. On the other hand, the second type is
negative stress or distress, when the degree of stress exceeds the limit of an individual, which
will generally reduce their performances. Some of the researches believed that job stress places
some negative influences where it can decrease productivity, undermine creativity, and lower
the quality of the job (Hsieh et al., 2004). Job stress can arise from the three aspects which are
organizational, environmental and individual factors. There are many factors that can create job
stress which is intrinsic to job, role and position in the organization, career development,
relationship at work, change of organizational structure and climate, new technological adoption,
change of job function and many others factors that can be led to influence the employee’s job
performance.
Motivation
Motivation is known as an internal process which directs individual to behave in a particular way.
It can be defined as the desire or willingness of an individual to perform some task or the ability
International Journal of Academic Research economics and management sciences
Vol. 9 , No. 1, 2020, E-ISSN: 2226-3624 © 2020 HRMARS
to satisfy some needs (DeCenzo & Robbins, 1996). Other than that, motivation can be also
defined as the energy or force that moves employees forward to performing a certain activity or
task. This motivation will help to strengthen the willingness of employees to work and also
improve the organization’s effectiveness and competitive advantages (Parashar, 2016).
According to Muda, Rafiki, and Harahap (2014), the motivated employees relate to the attitude
of self-fulfillment, self-satisfaction, and self-commitment that are expected to perform better job
quality and are more persistent to achieve desired goals which will extensively competitive
advantage and materialize efficiencies. Besides, motivation will increase employee job
involvement by making the task more interesting and meaningful, and it helps to enhance
employee’s productivity and improve their job performance (Ekerman, 2006).
The motivation of employees is one of the most significant and essential factors for the
achievement of employees which will eventually accomplish or achieve the organization's goals
and targets. One of the major problems facing the organization is motivation because it is an
important factor in order to retain or attract employees inside the company. It also acts as a
connection between the employees and the organization target which will lead the employees
to be more innovative and creative to move them to go beyond the limitation of tasks (Parashar,
2016). George et al (2002) are further strengthening the relationship between job performances
and motivation as he stated that motivation is a factor that contributes to the performances.
Apart from that, motivation can be classified into two primary types which are intrinsic
motivation and extrinsic motivation. Intrinsic motivation is driven by the internal force within an
individual, which refers to employees to get satisfaction and enjoyment from performing a work
(Lin, 2007). It can be further explained that intrinsic motivation is the performance of a task for
its own sake or satisfaction rather than another outcome. Whereas extrinsic motivation is driven
by the external force to the individual, which can be described as an individual perform an action
or certain task is affected by the external factor such as rewards and benefits (Lin, 2007). Many
researchers and theories have proven that intrinsic motivation is more effective than the extrinsic
motivation in motivating the employees. (Giancola, 2014). However, there is an argument on the
researcher which mentions extrinsic motivation is more effective as the employees receive
rewards when putting in more effort to accomplish their work, job security, and get promotions
(Nasri & Charfeddine, 2012). Therefore, it can be concluded that both motivations have their pros
and cons and it would be better if the organization motivate employees by considering the
internal and external factors.
Workload
The workload can be defined as the amount of work or task, which the employee is responsible
to complete on the given task (Ali, Raheem, Nawaz, & Imamuddin, 2014). The amount of work
will create pressure or stress to the employees when it has exceeded the employee’s capacity
level. The researcher mentioned that the workload is perceived as a very critical issue or problem
among the employee who is working in the manufacturing industry (Ibrahim, 2013). As
mentioned by Ibrahim (2013), stress will occur when an increased workload on an individual
which can affect their job performance and the achievement of the organization. The factor
refers to the level of stress that has been experienced by the employees due to the conception
that they are not able to adapt to the amount of work that has been assigned to them (Idris,
2011).
International Journal of Academic Research economics and management sciences
Vol. 9 , No. 1, 2020, E-ISSN: 2226-3624 © 2020 HRMARS
The workload can be categorized into two types which are role overload and role lower load. Role
overload is defined as when the employees are expected to do beyond the limit on the availability
of time, resources, ability, and capability, where their direct employer or top management is
giving a very high expectation on their work (Ammar, 2016). According to Conley and Woosley
(2000), role overload can be quantitative and qualitative, where quantitative takes place when
the employees have a high amount of work to complete or the period provided is too short to
complete the task. Whereas, qualitative happen when the employee has insufficient ability to
perform the task. On the other hand, role lower load is described as when the duties or workload
is less than the level of employee capabilities, the individual may feel bored or afraid and fear.
They may feel their job is insecure as their presence is a lack of importance which will affect their
job performance. Apart from that, the workload may increase when there is technological
change, restructuring of the organization, change of job functions, or workforce adjustment.
Perceived Job Insecurity
Perceived job insecurity can be described as an individual’s job is perceiving threaten where they
are fearful of losing a respective job (Hellgren & Sverke, 2003; Awan & Salam, 2014). Job
insecurity will lead to an individual unpredictability and uncertainty on their employment which
will generally create stress and impact on their health, behavior, and attitude (Sverke, & Goslinga,
2003). The performance of an employee can be affected drastically due to the insecurity of the
job (Yusoff, Mat & Zainol, 2017). According to Campbell and Sengenberger (1994), job insecurity
can determine the well-being of an individual from various perspectives which can be further
explained that the lifestyle and health of an individual can be determined by the status of current
job security.
There are many factors that may impact job security such as demographic, age, gender,
qualification and experience. All these factors play an important role in creating individual job
insecurity. Based on Elst et al. (2014), people in the age of 40s who have the responsibility to
raise children and old age employees experience more job insecurity. Other than that
socioeconomic status also one of the factors that impact job insecurity where an individual having
a low education level and low status would have a high level of insecurity (Sverke, 2003). Many
researchers have shown that job insecurity does not only look on the ability to lose a job but it
may be viewed in other dimensions of the job such as short term laid off, benefits cut, growth,
and promotion being cut off are defined as job insecurity (Klug, 2017).
According to Vieitez, Carcía, and Rodríguez's (2001) study, job insecurity seems to be influenced
by the factor situational and personal characteristics. For those who have a low level of
qualification and their occupation is related to automation, they would experience more
intensely on the perception of technology as a threat to their job security. In other words,
different levels of position or social status, age, qualification, experience or competence of
employees who acquired to work with new technology will have to experience high job
insecurity. Thus, the effects of technological change within the organization would give a positive
relation to job insecurity.
Underpinning Theory: Technology Acceptance Model (TAM)
Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) was introduced by Fred Davis (1989) which is a theory that
specifically tailored to predict the acceptance and use of technologies or information systems by
International Journal of Academic Research economics and management sciences
Vol. 9 , No. 1, 2020, E-ISSN: 2226-3624 © 2020 HRMARS
individuals. Technology Acceptance Model is an extension of the Theory of Reasoned Action
(TRA), however, it does not have the characteristic of subjective norms in the structure from TRA.
Technology Acceptance Model is an information system theory that followed by information
seekers or learners, who accept, inculcate, and utilize new technologies in their life. In the past
studies, this Model is remained one of the most influential models and widely used by various
research that explains an individual’s technology acceptance behavior in a different type of
technology (Surendran, 2012).
Figure 1 Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) (David et al, 1989)
In TAM, there are two main factors that determine the acceptance of the use of technology and
user behavior, which are perceived usefulness (PU) and perceived ease of use (PEU). Perceived
Usefulness is defined as the potential of user-perceived that certain systems or technologies will
improve his/her daily task, which is seen as “performance expectancy” by Pantano and Pietro
(2012). Perceived ease of use can be defined as the degree of which the potential of the user
expects the targeted system to be useful and effortless (David, 1989), which is seen as “effort
expectancy” (Kwon & Wen, 2010). Based on Venkatesh and Bala (2008), TAM manages to
consistently explain 40% of the variance in an individual’s intention. Apart from that, TAM is
concerned with the system characteristics that will influence the individual acceptance level.
The development of the Technology Acceptance Model passed through three main phases, which
are adoption, validation, and extension (Han, 2003). The adoption phases are concerned with
the parsimonious of TAM. The Validation phase can be divided into two main parts. The first part
is to prove the psychometric characteristics of TAM’s two main factors, perceived usefulness (PU)
and perceived ease of use (PEU). Whereas, the second part of the validation phase is to prove
the relationship between TAM’s constructs and external variables that affect perceived
usefulness and perceived ease of use (Al-Aulamie, 2013). The extension phase is to extend the
TAM by including external variables or moderating variables. Technology Acceptance Model is
extensively used by many researchers in their study. Despite the growth of information usage,
Technology Acceptance Model has proven that it can help to confirm the age, income level,
education, and race are associated with the information and beliefs that can influence the
attitude toward and use of skills that enhance access to information.
Research Model and Hypotheses
Based on the above finding, the proposed conceptual framework on the study indicates the
possible relationship between technology adoption in an organization and employees' job
International Journal of Academic Research economics and management sciences
Vol. 9 , No. 1, 2020, E-ISSN: 2226-3624 © 2020 HRMARS
performances among the manufacturing industry in Malaysia. Perceived job insecurity
representing in the framework below it acts as a mediating effect on the relationship between
both technology adoption and employees' job performance. There are three factors that
contribute to employee’s job performance which are job stress, motivation, and workload. Other
than that, the conceptual framework below is to investigate how technology adoption in an
organization plays a significant role in affecting employee’s job performance in the Malaysian
manufacturing industry as it may give a positive or negative impact on the organization. Based
on the discussions above, the following hypotheses were formulated:
H1a There is a significant relationship between technology adoption and job stress.
H1b There is a significant relationship between technology adoption and motivation.
H1c There is a significant relationship between technology adoption and workload.
H2 The mediating effect of perceived job insecurity on the relationship between
technology adoption and employee job performance.
In order to test these relationships, a theoretical framework as shown in Figure 2 was proposed
in this study.
Figure 2 Research Model
Methods
Sample and Data Collection
This study proposes to employ a survey using a quantitative method to understand and test the
accuracy of the theories in providing the relationship between technology adoption in an
organization and employee’s job performances. The data collection for this study is through
survey questionnaires, by distributed to a large pool of respondents throughout the Malaysian
manufacturing industry. In order to attain data effectively, these survey questionnaires use an
internet survey as the platform because it saves time, cost-effective, and the ease of distributing
the questionnaires to the respondents. The survey questionnaires are described in detail on the
technology adoption in an organization and employee’s job performance level among the
Malaysian manufacturing industry, as well as the perceived job insecurity as the mediating factor.
The employee’s job performance level among the respondents will be tested and the survey
question is based on the factors that affect job performance such as job stress, motivation, and
workload.
Employee Job Performance
Job Stress
Motivation
Workload
Perceived Job
Insecurity
Technology
Adoption
International Journal of Academic Research economics and management sciences
Vol. 9 , No. 1, 2020, E-ISSN: 2226-3624 © 2020 HRMARS
This research was mainly focused on the workers who are working in the Malaysian
manufacturing industry that are from the age group of 18 to 60 years old. The Malaysian
manufacturing industry employed more than 1 million people. Based on the Krejcie and Morgan
(1970) sample size calculation, exceeding a maximum population size of 100,000 requires a
minimum of 384 usable respondents. Therefore, for this study minimum sample size of 384
respondents is needed in order to obtain the reliable answer to the research question
investigated and gather the necessary information to describe the characteristics of the entire
population (Chuan, 2006). A simple random sampling method will be used for this research where
the sample is choosing among a wide range of populations. The target audiences for this research
are those who are working in the Malaysian manufacturing industry and everyone has the chance
to being selected as a sample, it depends on the willingness of the respondent in participating
this research.
The data collection procedure is a plan on how to access and gather information from the
respondents. This research is focused on the quantitative method where all the data are collected
through survey questionnaires. It will be analyzed using statistical software and tested against
the hypothesis. In this research, primary data collection is mainly based on a quantitative
research method where the information or data is collected through the online survey
questionnaires. Whereas, the secondary information will be gathered through journals and
articles.
Firstly, the questionnaire was designed based on the research variables which include the
technology adoption in an organization as the independent variable, employees' job
performance with three dimensions (Job stress, Motivation, and Workload) as the dependent
variables, and perceived job insecurity as the mediating factors. Other than that, the
questionnaires will also comprise the demographic profile of the respondents. The explanation
of the purpose and significance of this study will be highlighted at the beginning of the
questionnaires as this is to ensure that the respondents understand the research and have a clear
mindset when filling the questionnaires. The distributed questionnaires are divided into four
sections which are sections I, II, III and IV. For Section I, it is mainly contained on the general
questions that relate to the personal information of the people who are working in Malaysia
manufacturing industry and their background details such as age, gender, ethnicity, qualification,
income level, years of service, job functions and levels of position in the respective organization.
Whereas, for section II, it will purely be focusing on technology adoption in the organization that
could be determined. In this section, the respondent will be asked on technology adoption
provide by the organization to provide adequate support to the employees. For section III, it will
comprise the employee’s job performance such as job stress, motivation and workload that
affecting by the technology adoption in the organization. The last section IV of the questionnaires
will be the mediating factor of perceived job insecurity and to examine the job security level of
the respondent in their organization. The survey questionnaires will be distributed or circulated
to the target audience through internet platform and hardcopy distribution. The process of
distributing the questionnaires and collection of data will be estimated to take a period of one to
two months to complete. The data collected from the survey questionnaires will be analyzed
using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software. This SPSS software is used to
summarize and analyze the collected data from the survey, as well as exploring the relationship
between the responses to a different question. Besides, SPSS also well serve in calculating the
International Journal of Academic Research economics and management sciences
Vol. 9 , No. 1, 2020, E-ISSN: 2226-3624 © 2020 HRMARS
correlation between the research variables and the mediators and transform the raw data into
usable information which will address the research question and hypothesis
Measures and Instrumentation
Measures
The measurement used for this research is a nominal scale and a 5-point Likert scale. Likert scale
is the most effective approach used to measure the level of respondent’s perception and opinion
based on the statement in questionnaires. The nominal scale is the lowest form of a
measurement that uses to simply categorized the respondents’ personal information such as age,
gender, level of qualification, years of service in the organization, functions, levels of position in
the respective organization, and location of work. All the personal variable question that consists
of demographic information of respondents will be given in the questionnaires. The initially
gather information need to filter out the irrelevant data, in order to have an accurate analysis.
Besides, the measurement used for the technology adoption in an organization, employee’s job
performance level, and perceived job insecurity question is using a 5-point Likert scale to gather
data. Respondents will be offered a choice of five-point scale such as Strongly Agree (5), Agree
(4), Neutral (3), Disagree (2), and Strongly Disagree (1) that designed to measure the levels of
respondent’s agreement or disagreement with a particular statement. The gathered data will be
further investigated the relationship between technology adoption and employee’s job
performance.
Instrumentation
Instrumentation is a process of constructing research instruments that could be used in collecting
the data for the study. The most commonly used tools in gathering data for quantitative research
is questionnaires or survey. In this research, questionnaires or survey that consists of a series of
questions will be used as the research instrument in collecting the specific information of the
study from target respondents. The set of questionnaires is described in detail about technology
adoption and employee job performance in the Malaysian manufacturing industry while
perceived job insecurity as the mediating factor. These survey questionnaires use the online
survey as the platform in attaining data effectively while saving time, cost, and ease of
distributing throughout the people who are working in the Malaysian manufacturing industry.
The questionnaires for this research are adapted from the previous studies. Table 1 below shows
the survey questionnaire items such as the research variable and its dimension for this study.
International Journal of Academic Research economics and management sciences
Vol. 9 , No. 1, 2020, E-ISSN: 2226-3624 © 2020 HRMARS
Table 1 Research Test Instruments
Author
Construct
Dimensions
Number
of Items
Lee et al (2004)
Technology
Adoption
N/A
6
Ahmad et al., (2015)
Employee’s Job
Performance
Job Stress
6
Motivation
6
Workload
5
Borg and Elizur
(1992)
Perceived Job
Insecurity
N/A
4
Data Analysis and Results
Research Sample Analysis
In this research, 370 valid responses were used for further analysis after removing all the outliers.
All 370 respondents are from the Malaysian Manufacturing Industry.
Table 2 Research Sample Analysis
Characteristics
Category
Frequency
(%)
Gender
Male
289
78.1
Female
81
28.9
Work Experience
0-5 years
132
35.7
6-10 years
127
34.3
11-15 years
29
7.8
16-20 years
53
14.3
21-25 years
23
6.2
More than 25
years
6
1.6
Age
20-30 years old
122
33.0
31-40 years old
160
43.2
41-50 years old
82
22.2
51-60 years old
6
1.6
Based on Table 2 above, there are total 122 respondents are from age of 20 to 30 years old, 160
respondents are from age of 31 to 40 years old, followed by 82 respondents from age of 41 to 50
years old, and 6 respondents from 51 to 60 years old. For gender, most of the respondent is male
International Journal of Academic Research economics and management sciences
Vol. 9 , No. 1, 2020, E-ISSN: 2226-3624 © 2020 HRMARS
which have a total of 289 respondents while 81 respondents are female. Other than that, there
are 132 respondents having 0-5 working experiences, followed by 127 respondents having 610
years working experiences, 29 respondents having 1115 years, 53 respondents having 16-20
years, 23 respondents having 21-25 years and 6 respondents having working experiences that
are more than 25 years.
Research Instruments Reliability
In order to have good research quality, there are few tests that should be done to ensure the
consistency of the result. The reliability of the research survey questionnaires needs to be
considered as it reflects the replicability and consistency of results. In this research, the Cronbach
coefficient of Alpha (α) is used to estimate the reliability, measure the internal consistency of a
set of scale or test items and use to calculate the split-half reliability for multiple items. Besides,
it also determines the relationship between individual item scores. The components of
technology adoption in an organization, employee’s job performance, and perceived job
insecurity used in this research can be assessed using Cronbach alpha reliability analysis. Before
distributing the survey questionnaires to the respondents, a pilot test is needed to be carried to
ensure the questionnaires are relevant to the research. The Cronbach α coefficient of reliability
ranges from 0 to 1, the pilot test result is said to be consistent and reliable when the coefficient
value is said to be higher. For the value of 0.7 and above it illustrates that the internal consistency
reliability is satisfactory (DeVellis, 2016). If the α coefficient is less than or equal to 0.7, it is
considered low reliability and unacceptable as it would influence the overall result to be
inaccurate. Thus, the reliability issue in this research is fully addressed to best suit the research
needs and purpose. A pilot study was conducted by distributing the survey questionnaires to
twenty respondents before conducting the main research. This pilot test was done to check the
feasibility of the approach before proceeding to a large-scale study. Once the pilot test result
suits the purpose of the study, survey questionnaires will be distributed to a large scale of
respondents.
Table 3 Research Instrument Reliability
Construct
Cronbach’s
Alpha
Technology Adoption
0.842
Perceived Job Insecurity
0.889
Employee’s Job Performance
0.718
Based on the pilot test results, all three variables have a Cronbach’s alpha that is more than 0.7.
According to DeVellis (2016), the α coefficient more than or equal to 0.7, it is acceptable and can
be brought forward to the next process of large-scale distribution throughout the manufacturing
industry in Malaysia.
International Journal of Academic Research economics and management sciences
Vol. 9 , No. 1, 2020, E-ISSN: 2226-3624 © 2020 HRMARS
Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA)
Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) is a test that uses to measure the sampling adequacy that examines
the appropriateness of the factor analysis. According to Kaiser (1974) and Thompson (2004), the
value of KMO recommends being greater than 0.50 that indicates the sample is adequate.
Bartlett’s test of Sphericity is used to test for the presences of the null hypothesis that the original
correlation matrix has an identity matrix (Hadi, Abdullah, & Sentosa, 2016). The presence of the
null hypothesis can be tested through the significant interrelationship that occurs between
variables. The significant value of less than 0.05 is considered appropriate and can proceed for
further analysis (Field, 2009).
Table 4 Measure of Sampling Adequacy
KMO and Bartlett's Test
Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy
.863
Bartlett's Test of
Sphericity
Approx. Chi-Square
704.515
df
10
Sig.
.000
Based on Table 4, the KMO value s 0.863 which indicates that the result is adequate. The null
hypothesis is rejected as Bartlett’s test significant value is 0.000 which is less than 0.05.
Principle Component Analysis (PCA) is one of the approaches to factor analysis that consider the
total variance in the data and transform the original variables into a smaller set of the linear
combination. It is the best and well-known approach that is widely used for the dimension
reduction technique (Jolliffe, 2011). The purpose of PCA is used to reduce the dimension of the
data by searching a few orthogonal linear combinations of the original variables with the largest
variance (Fodor, 2002). According to Hair, Black, Babin, Anderson, and Tatham (2006), factor
loadings should be greater than 0.5 and anything lesser than the 0.5 is considered a weak relation
between variable.
International Journal of Academic Research economics and management sciences
Vol. 9 , No. 1, 2020, E-ISSN: 2226-3624 © 2020 HRMARS
Table 5 Component Matrix Technology Adoption
Construct
Items
Factor
Loading
Technology
Adoption
TA1. M
y organization provides technology support
for collaborative work regardless of time
and place.
0.750
TA2. M
y organization provided technology support
for communication among organization
members.
0.800
TA3. M
y organization provides technology support
for searching and accessing necessary
information.
0.800
TA4. M
y organization provides technology support
for simulation and prediction.
0.806
TA5. M
y organization provides technology for
systematic storing.
0.796
Based on Table 5, the factor analysis for technology adoption variables can be concluded that all
the 5 items having strong factor loadings.
Table 6 Rotated Component Matrix Employee Job Performance
Construct
Items
Factor
Loading
Job Stress
JS1. I
feel that working closely with technology
cause a great deal of tension.
0.771
JS2. I
feel technology frustrates me.
0.825
JS3. I
consider leaving technology
0.743
JS4. I
feel that I work too hard in technology.
0.791
JS5. I
feel that working with technology leads to
burnout.
0.801
International Journal of Academic Research economics and management sciences
Vol. 9 , No. 1, 2020, E-ISSN: 2226-3624 © 2020 HRMARS
Construct
Items
Factor
Loading
Motivation
MO1. W
hen I use technology to complete my job, I
feel a sense of personal satisfaction
0.777
MO2. I
take pride in doing my job as well as I can.
0.878
MO3. I
feel unhappy when my work is not up to my
standard when I use technology.
0.885
MO4. I
feel satisfied when I sense the job of the
day is well done.
0.792
MO5. I
try to think of using technology to do my
job effectively.
0.566
MO6. W
hen I use technology to complete my job, I
feel a sense of personal satisfaction
0.600
Workload
WL1. D
ue to technology, my workload affecting my
working capabilities.
0.716
WL2. D
ue to technology, my workload affecting my
personal life.
0.708
Based on Table 6, the factor analysis for employee’s job performance variables can be concluded
that all 3 dimensions are related and can be used in the hypothesis analysis. However, there are
a total of 5 items known as JS6, MO2, WL1, WL4, WL5 are overlapping into another dimension
which has been removed for further analysis.
International Journal of Academic Research economics and management sciences
Vol. 9 , No. 1, 2020, E-ISSN: 2226-3624 © 2020 HRMARS
Table 7 Component Matrix Perceived Job Insecurity
Construct
Items
Factor
Loading
Perceived Job
Insecurity
PJI1. I
believe that my job in this organization is
secure.
0.879
PJI2. I
n my opinion, I will have a job in this
organization for as long as I want one.
0.880
PJI3. I
am confident that this organization will
continue to need my skills and job
knowledge.
0.835
PJI4. M
y job performance history will protect me
from losing my job in this organization.
0.845
Based on Table 7, the factor analysis for the perceived job insecurity variable concludes that all 4
items have met required threshold levels of factor loading and therefore can be used for
hypothesis testing.
Hypotheses Testing
Hypothesis testing is a statistical technique that is used in making the statistical decision by using
the observation data. The purpose of hypothesis testing is to prove whether the developed
hypothesis is true or false. This determines the outcome of the study. In hypothesis testing, the
significant p-value is used to determine the significance of the result either support or reject. The
hypothesis with a significant p-value that is less than 0.05, which indicates that the hypothesis is
significant and supported. A t-value is a standardized value that is calculated the size of the
difference relative to the variation from the sample data during a hypothesis test. The closer the
t-value to 0, the more likely the hypothesis is not significant. The standardized beta coefficient is
used to compares the strength of the effect of each individual dependent variable and
independent variable. The higher the value of the standardized beta coefficient, the stronger the
effect. The sign in the standardized beta coefficient indicates it is a positive relationship or
negative relationship between the dependent variable and the independent variable.
International Journal of Academic Research economics and management sciences
Vol. 9 , No. 1, 2020, E-ISSN: 2226-3624 © 2020 HRMARS
The results of path coefficients are shown in Table 8.
Table 8 Standardized Regression Weights Based on Fit Model
Hypothesis
Endogeno
us
Exogenous
Std.
Estima
te
t-
value
P-Value
Decision at
p < 0.05
H1a
JS
TA
-0.264
-5.250
0.000
Significant
H1b
MO
TA
0.327
6.633
0.000
Significant
H1c
WL
TA
-0.041
-0.789
0.431
Insignificant
Based on Table 8, the t-value is -5.250 while the p-value is 0.000 < 0.050. This result indicates
that hypothesis, H1a is supported and a significant relationship is found between technology
adoption and job stress. The standardized beta value of -0.264 shows that there is the support
that technology adoption influences employee’s job stress, the negative standardized beta
indicates that there is a negative relationship. As a result, a negative relationship exists between
technology adoption and job stress. In testing motivation, the t-value is 6.633 while the p-value
is 0.000 < 0.050. This result indicates that hypothesis, H1b is supported and a significant
relationship is found between technology adoption and motivation. The standardized beta value
of -0.327 shows that there is support that technology adoption influences employee’s
motivation. As a result, there is a relationship exist between technology adoption and motivation.
The t-value for workload is -0.789 while the p-value is 0.431 > 0.050. This result indicates that
hypothesis, H1c is not supported and no significant relationship is found between technology
adoption and workload. The standardized beta value of -0.041 shows that there is no support
that technology adoption influences an employee’s workload. As a result, there is no relationship
exist between technology adoption and workload.
Mediating hypotheses testing is used to investigate the effect of the mediator on the relationship
between the dependent variable and the independent variable. Baron and Kenny (1986)
proposed a method for testing the relationship of two variables, independent variable and
dependent variable with a mediating factor. It suggested the four-step approach of regression
analysis to determine the significance of the coefficients derived at each step. The first three
steps are to identify that there is a zero-order relationship among the tested variables. Once all
three-step indicate a significant relationship between two variables and mediating factor, step
four can proceed. According to MacKinnon, Fairchild, and Fritz (2007), mediation does not occur
if one of the steps from the first three-step having an insignificant relationship. For step 4, partial
mediation is supported if the mediating factor perceived job insecurity remains significant after
controlling the independent variable, technology adoption.
International Journal of Academic Research economics and management sciences
Vol. 9 , No. 1, 2020, E-ISSN: 2226-3624 © 2020 HRMARS
Table 9 Mediation Analysis
Step
Endogeno
us
Exogenous
Std.
Estima
te
t-
value
P-Value
Decision at
p < 0.05
1
EJP
TA
-0.060
-1.152
0.250
Insignificant
2
PJI
TA
0.205
4.022
0.000
Significant
3
EJP
PJI
-0.249
-4.935
0.000
Significant
4
EJP
TA & PJI
-
-
-
-
-
-
Based on Table 9, the first step shows the significant p-value of 0.250 > 0.050 which indicates
that the independent variable, employee’s job performance is not significantly affecting the
dependent variable in the absence of the mediator. For step 2 and 3 shows the significant p-value
0.000 < 0.050 which indicates that the independent variable is significant to affect the mediator
and the mediator has a significant effect on the dependent variable. Since step 1 indicates no
significant relationship between two variables, it is not allowed to continue with step 4. As a
result, no mediation exists between the two variables.
Discussion
Employee’s job performance consists of three dimensions which include job stress, motivation,
and workload. As stated by Dauda (2011), the organization who tend to lay emphasize on capital
in term of technology advancements such as machinery and equipment tend to reduce labor cost
in order to increase their profitability. It does not increase the employee’s productivity and
performance. The substitution of the technology for labor does not really signify employee’s
performance and productivity. According to Wanza and Nkuraru (2016), constructing and
reconstructing existing technology in an organization to cater to customer needs and market
change gives an unsatisfying outcome. This is proven that half of these technologies change
project experiences failure and does not improve employee’s performance. In the Malaysian
manufacturing sector, a total of 49,101 companies had established in the year 2015 and 47,698
(97.1%) are from Small to Medium Enterprise (SME) while others are from large firms
(Department of Statistics Malaysia, 2016). Based on the Federation of Malaysian Manufacturers
(FMM), the readiness of the Malaysian manufacturing industry in adopting advanced technology
such as automation is very low. Most of the SME companies are aware of the need to embrace
industry 4.0 but they have not seriously adopted automation technology in their companies. This
is mainly due to the initial cost of automating and digitizing their business could be a big challenge
for them and they are lacking relevant talents to lead them forward in these developments. This
contrary to many findings on the impact of technology on the organization and employee
performance has been explained that the capacity to adopt the acquire technology advancement
may be low in the Malaysian manufacturing industry.
According to Korunka et al (1993) and Karsh (2004), employee involvement in the
implementation of new technology decision leads to a higher level of acceptance of the new
technologies and reduce job dissatisfaction as well as reduce the level of stress. According to
David (2003), there are many factors that influence an individual’s attitudes which can motivate
International Journal of Academic Research economics and management sciences
Vol. 9 , No. 1, 2020, E-ISSN: 2226-3624 © 2020 HRMARS
an individual to accept and move towards new technologies. He mentioned that motivated
employees tend to embrace the changes and seek new applications for technology advancement.
Based on Bhaduri and Kumar (2011), motivated employees tend to become an adopter of
technology changes when the employee desired to acquire relative skills and knowledge to
support the organizational goal. As stated by Kwon Choi, Koo Moon, and Ko (2013) and Plewa,
Troshani, Francis, and Rampersad (2012), the researchers confirmed that adoption of technology
in an organization is an important factor for moderating employee’s motivation and achieving
organizational performances and effectiveness. This strengthens the relationship between
technology adoption and motivation. According to Suharti and Susanto (2014), employee’s
workload increases when involved in a high-tech work environment. This is because they
required to learn and master high-tech skills and knowledge. Based on Pires, Matos, Azambuja,
Trindade, and Scherer (2014), employee’s workload increases when they are required to adopt
new technology and have to learn how to manage the equipment and organization. These
authors also mentioned that providing education and training to employees contributes to
increased confidence and security in handling the new technology which could eventually reduce
their workloads. Most of the research shows that there is a significant relationship between
technology adoption and workload. However, limited research shows no significant relationship.
According to Abramis (1994), employee decrease in performance and plan to leave the job is
assumed to be a consequence of perceived job insecurity. Other than that, De Witte (2005) also
mentioned perceived job insecurity is associated with employee performance decrease and
reduce organizational citizenship behaviors. The result also shows that there is a significant
relationship between technology adoption and perceived job insecurity. As stated by Gallivan
(2004) and Benamati and Lederer (2001), the fast pace of technological change in an organization
increase the need to acquire more skills and knowledge to perform according to the latest
technological change. The pressure of continuously enhancing the skills and knowledge to
perform efficiently to technology advancement is creating more pressure and insecurity among
the employees. Due to no significant relationship between technology adoption and employee
job performance, therefore there is no mediating effect of perceived job security.
Conclusion
The present research explores and identifies the relationship between technology adoption and
employee job performance as well as determining the mediating effect of perceived job
insecurity in the Malaysian manufacturing industry. The finding obtained from this study has
shown that two out of three factors contributing to employee’s job performance such as job
stress and motivation have a significant relationship with technology adoption. One of the factors
for employee job performance, the workload does not have a significant relationship with
technology adoption. The mediating effect of perceived job insecurity has no significant
relationship between technology adoption and employee job performance. This study has
offered some theoretical and practical contributions.
In terms of theoretical contribution, this study contributed to provide clear information on
Malaysia’s employee's job performance when adoption technology in a manufacturing company.
This research gives further insight into the factors contributing to employee’s job performance
such as job stress, motivation, and workload which will influence by the technology adoption of
an organization. Besides that, it also provides the researchers with a better understanding of the
International Journal of Academic Research economics and management sciences
Vol. 9 , No. 1, 2020, E-ISSN: 2226-3624 © 2020 HRMARS
linkage of technology adoption with employee’s job performance. These relationships were
tested and additional information pertaining to technology adoption and employee’s job
performance has been developed from the findings. Moreover, the negative results on perceived
job insecurity as a mediator effect on technology adoption and employee’s job performance give
information to the researcher this mediator factor is not influencing both variables. Other than
that, the field of study is new as it only covers on Malaysian manufacturing industry, it can be
used as a reference for future researches whose study is related to this field. Lastly, the results
of this study could be used to develop a new theoretical framework in future researches.
In terms of managerial contribution, the findings from this study could be used by all
manufacturing industries as they are focusing on technology adaption in order to sustain their
position in the market and being more productive. It will give the manufacturing industry an
insight into technology development influencing an individual’s performance at work. According
to Davis (1989), the attitude-behavior of individual influences an individual to adopt or reject
technology. This is a very important aspect as the employee’s performance directly portraits
through their behavior. Besides that, the manufacturing industry can utilize the data from this
study in their research and development to secure jobs in spite of technology adoption to ensure
that the employee’s job performance remains at peak. This study is also beneficial to the
government sector as it also helps them to understand the need for technology in attaining good
job performance. The study can also help in understanding the effects of job stress, workload,
and motivation influencing the job performance of an individual.
References
Abramis, D. J. (1994). Relationship of job stressors to job performance: Linear or an inverted-U?.
Psychological Reports, Vol. 75(1), pp. 547-558.
Achieng, D. O., & Jagero, J. A. (2014). Management Support in Adoption of Computer Integrated
Model in Financial Forecasting. International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting,
Finance and Management Sciences, Vol. 4(2), pp. 170-179.
Ahmad, S. (2014). Technology in organizations. International Journal of Research in Business
Management, Vol. 2(7), pp. 73-80.
Ahmad, A., Khan, M. U., Srikanth, A. B., Patel, I., Nagappa, A. N., & Jamshed, S. Q. (2015).
Evaluation of workload and its impact on satisfaction among pharmacy academicians in
Southern India. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, Vol. 9(6), FC01.
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision
Processes, Vol. 50(2), pp. 179-211.
Ammar, T. (2006). The effect of internal variables on the level of job stress on the employees of
Palestinian Universities at Gaza Strip. Master thesis. Islamic University, Gaza, 55.
Al-Aulamie, A. (2013) 'Enhanced technology acceptance model to explain and predict learners'
behavioural intentions in learning management systems'. Ph.D. thesis. University of
Bedfordshire.
Ali, W., Raheem, A., Nawaz, A., & Imamuddin, K. (2014). Impact of stress on job performance: An
empirical study of the employees of Private Sector Universities of Karachi, Pakistan.
International Science Congress Association, Vol. 3(7), pp. 14-17.
International Journal of Academic Research economics and management sciences
Vol. 9 , No. 1, 2020, E-ISSN: 2226-3624 © 2020 HRMARS
Awan, W. A., & Salam, A. (2014). Identifying the relationship between job insecurity and
employee performanceAn evidence from private colleges in Larkana, Pakistan. Beykent
University Journal of Social Sciences, Vol. 7(1), pp. 23-30.
Bagozzi, R. P. (2007). The legacy of the technology acceptance model and a proposal for a
paradigm shift. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, Vol. 8(4), pp. 244-254.
Benamati, J., & Lederer, A. L. (2001). Coping with rapid changes in IT. Communications of the
ACM, Vol. 44(8), pp. 83-88.
Bernerth, J. (2004). Expanding our understanding of the change message. Human Resource
Development Review, Vol. 3(1), pp. 36-52.
Bhaduri, S., & Kumar, H. (2011). Extrinsic and intrinsic motivations to innovate: tracing the
motivation of ‘grassroot’ innovators in India. Mind & Society, Vol. 10(1), pp. 27-55.
Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. M. (1993). Expanding the Criterion Domain to Include Elements
of Contextual Performance, in N. Schmitt & W. C. Borman (Eds.), Personnel Selection in
Organizations, p. 71-98.
Borg, I., & Elizur, D. (1992). Job insecurity: Correlates, moderators and measurement.
International Journal of Manpower, Vol. 13(2), pp. 13-26.
Campbell, D., & Sengenberger W. (1994). Labour standards, economic efficiency and
development: lessons from experience with industrial restructuring. International
Institute for Labor Studies, Vol. 49(2), pp. 421-39.
Chuan, C. L. (2006). Sample size estimation using Krejcie and Morgan and Cohen statistical power
analysis: A comparison. Jurnal Penyelidikan IPBL, Vol. 7(1), pp. 78-86.
Conway, P. M., Campanini, P., Sartori, S., Dotti, R., & Costa, G. (2008). Main and interactive effects
of shift work, age and work stress on health in an Italian sample of healthcare workers.
Applied Ergonomics, Vol. 39(5), pp. 630-639.
Conley, S., & Woosley, S. A. (2000), Teacher role stress, higher order needs and work outcomes.
Journal of Educational Administration, Vol. 38(2), pp. 179-201.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of
information technology. MIS Quarterly, Vol. 13(3) pp. 319-340.
Dauda, Y. A., & Akingbade, W. A. (2011). Technology innovation and Nigeria banks performance:
The assessment of employee’s and customer’s responses. American Journal of Social and
Management Sciences, Vol. 2(3), pp. 329-340.
DeCenzo, D. A., & Robbins, S. P. (1996). Human resources management. New York: John Wiley &
Sons, Inc.
DeVellis, R. F. (2016). Scale development: Theory and applications. Sage Publications.
De Witte, H. (2005). Job insecurity: Review of the international literature on definitions,
prevalence, antecedents and consequences. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, Vol.
31(4), pp. 1-6.
Ekerman, G. (2006). Job Enrichment and Staff Motivation. Human Resource Management (pp.
183-191). Cape Town: Maskew Miller Longman (Pvt) Ltd.
Field, A. (2009). Discovering Statistics Using SPSS: Introducing Statistical Method (3rd edition).
Sage Publications.
French, Jr. J. R. (1975). A comparative look at stress and strain in policemen. Job stress and the
police officer: Identifying stress reduction techniques. Proceedings of Symposium, W H
Kroes, J J Hurrell, Jr - See Ncj-43642.
International Journal of Academic Research economics and management sciences
Vol. 9 , No. 1, 2020, E-ISSN: 2226-3624 © 2020 HRMARS
Fodor, I. K. (2002). A survey of dimension reduction techniques. Center for Applied Scientific
Computing, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Vol. 9, pp.1-18.
Gallivan, M. J. (2004). Examining IT professionals' adaptation to technological change: the
influence of gender and personal attributes. ACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for
Advances in Information Systems, Vol. 35(3), pp. 28-49.
George, J. M., Jones, G. R., & Sharbrough, W. C. (2002). Understanding and managing
organizational behavior. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River.
Giancola, F. L. (2014). Should HR Professionals Devote More Time to Intrinsic Rewards?.
Compensation & Benefits Review, Vol. 46(1), pp. 25-31.
Hadi, N. U., Abdullah, N., & Sentosa, I. (2016). An Easy Approach to Exploratory Factor Analysis:
Marketing Perspective. Journal of Educational and Social Research, Vol. 6(1), pp. 215-224.
Hair, J. F, Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. E. (2006). Multivariate data
analysis (6th edition). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Hampel, P. S., & Martinsons, M. G. (2009). Developing international organizational change theory
using cases from China. Human Relations, Vol. 62(4), pp. 459-499.
Han, S. (2003). Individual adoption of information systems in organizations: A literature review
of technology acceptance model. Technical Report 540, Turku Centre for Computer
Science.
Hellgren, J., & Sverke, M. (2003). Does job insecurity lead to impaired well-being or vice versa?
Estimation of cross-lagged effects using latent variable modelling. Journal of
Organizational Behavior, Vol. 24(2), pp. 215-236.
Ho-Jin, P., & Cho, J. S. (2016). The influence of information security technostress on the job
satisfaction of employees. Journal of Business and Retail Management Research, Vol.
11(1)., pp. 66-75.
Hsieh, H-L., Huang, L-C., & Su, K-J. (2004). Work stress and job performance in the hi tech
industry: A closer view for vocational education. World Transactions on Engineering and
Technology Education, 3(1), pp.147-150.
Ibrahim, N. A. (2013). The Effects of Worker Stress on the Job Performance in Electronic
Manufacturing. Doctoral dissertation, UMP.
Idris, M. (2011). Over time effects of role stress on psychological strain among Malaysian Public
University Academics. International Journal of Business and Social Science, Vol. 4(1), pp.
44-48.
Im, M., & Han, G. (2013). An investigation of causes and effects of technostress creators, The
Journal of Digital Policy & Management, Vol. 11(10), pp.31-45.
Imran, M., Maqbool, N., & Shafique, H. (2014). Impact of technological advancement on
employee performance in banking sector. International Journal of Human Resource
Studies, Vol 4(1), pp. 57.
Jolliffe, I. (2011). Principal component analysis. In International Encyclopedia of Statistical
Science, pp. 1094-1096. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Kahya, E. (2009). The effects of job performance on effectiveness. International Journal of
Industrial Ergonomics, Vol. 39(1), pp. 96-104.
Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, Vol. 39(1), pp. 31-36.
Karsh, B. T. (2004). Beyond usability: designing effective technology implementation systems to
promote patient safety. BMJ Quality & Safety, Vol. 13(5), pp. 388-394.
International Journal of Academic Research economics and management sciences
Vol. 9 , No. 1, 2020, E-ISSN: 2226-3624 © 2020 HRMARS
Klug, K. (2017). Young and at risk? Consequences of job insecurity for mental health and
satisfaction among labor market entrants with different levels of education. Economic
and Industrial Democracy, Vol. 27(2), pp. 223-244.
Korunka, C., Weiss, A., & Karetta, B. (1993). Effects of new technologies with special regard for
the implementation process per se. Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 14(4), pp.
331-348.
Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities.
Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 30(3), pp. 607-610.
Choi, K. B., Moon, K. H., & Ko, W. (2013). An organization's ethical climate, innovation, and
performance: Effects of support for innovation and performance evaluation.
Management Decision, Vol. 51(6), pp. 1250-1275.
Kwon, O., & Wen, Y. (2010). An empirical study of the factors affecting social network service use.
Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 26(2), pp. 254-263.
Lee, C. P., Warkentin, M., & Choi, H. (2004). The role of technological and social factors on the
adoption of mobile payment technologies. AMCIS 2004 Proceedings, 333.
Lee, Y., Kozar, K. A., & Larsen, K. R. T. (2003). The technology acceptance model: past, present,
and future. Communications of the AIS, Vol. 12(50), pp. 752-80.
Legris, P., Ingham, J., & Collerette, P. (2003). Why do people use information technology? A
critical review of the Technology Acceptance Model. Information & Management, Vol.
40(3), pp. 191-204.
Lin, H. F. (2007). Effects of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation on employee knowledge sharing
intentions. Journal of Information Science, Vol. 33(2), pp. 135-149.
Nasri, W., & Charfeddine, L. (2012). Motivating salespeople to contribute to marketing
intelligence activities: An expectancy theory approach. International Journal of Marketing
Studies, Vol. 4(1), pp. 168.
Madsen, S. R., Miller, D., & John, C. R. (2005). Readiness for organizational change: do
organizational commitment and social relationships in the workplace make a difference.
Human Resource Development Quarterly, Vol.1(2), pp. 213-33.
Mizuno, M., Yamada, Y., Ishii, A., & Tanaka, S. (2006). A human resource management approach
to motivation and job stress in paramedics. In International Congress Series, Vol. 1294,
pp. 167-170.
Muda, I., Rafiki, A., & Harahap, M. R. (2014). Factors influencing employees' performance: A study
on the Islamic banks in Indonesia. International Journal of Business and Social Science,
Vol. 5(2), pp. 73-80.
Meuter, M. L., Ostrom, A. L., Roundtree, R. I., & Bitner, M. J. (2000). Self-service technologies:
understanding customer satisfaction with technology-based service encounters. Journal
of Marketing, Vol. 64(3), pp. 50-64.
Motowidlo, S., Borman, W., & Schmidt, N. (1997). A theory of individual differences in task and
contextual performance. Human Performance, Vol. 10, pp. 71-83.
Odeh, M. H. (2019). Factors Affecting the Adoption of Financial Information Systems Based on
UTAUT Model. International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and
Management Sciences, Vol. 9(2), pp. 108-116.
International Journal of Academic Research economics and management sciences
Vol. 9 , No. 1, 2020, E-ISSN: 2226-3624 © 2020 HRMARS
Pantano, E., & Di Pietro, L. (2012). Understanding consumer’s acceptance of technology-based
innovations in retailing. Journal of technology management & innovation, Vol. 7(4), pp.
1-19.
Parashar, B. K. (2016). Significance of theory Z in Indian scenario. International Journal of
Management and Social Sciences Research, Vol. 5(2), pp. 8-16.
Park, C., & Im, M. (2012). The impact of technostress on information security perception and
organizational outcomes, The Journal of KIIT, Vol. 10(1), pp. 97-109.
Plewa, C., Troshani, I., Francis, A., & Rampersad, G. (2012). Technology adoption and
performance impact in innovation domains. Industrial Management & Data Systems, Vol.
112(5), pp. 748-765.
Pires, D. E. P. D., Matos, E., Azambuja, E. P. D., Trindade, L. D. L., & Scherer, M. D. D. A. (2014).
New Technologies and Workloads of Health Care Professionals. Universitätsverlag der TU
Berlin.
Poissonnet, C. M., & Véron, M. (2000). Health effects of work schedules in healthcare professions.
Journal of Clinical Nursing, Vol. 9(1), pp. 13-23.
Rizwan, M., Waseem, A., & Bukhari, S. A. (2014). Antecedents of job stress and its impact on job
performance and job satisfaction. International Journal of Learning and Development,
Vol. 4(2), pp.187-203.
Saeed, R., Mussawar, S., Lodhi, R. N., Iqbal, A., Nayab, H. H., & Yaseen, S. (2013). Factors affecting
the performance of employees at work place in the banking sector of Pakistan. Middle-
East Journal of Scientific Research, Vol. 17(9), pp. 1200-1208.
Schultz, R. L., & Slevin, D. P. (1975). Implementation and Organizational Validity: An Empirical
Investigation. In Implementing Operations Research Management Science, R.L. Schultz
and D.P. Slevin (eds.), American Elsevier, New York, NY, pp. 153-182.
Suharti, L., & Susanto, A. (2014). The impact of workload and technology competence on
technostress and performance of employees. Indian Journal of Commerce and
Management Studies, Vol. 5(2), pp. 1.
Surendran, P. (2012). Technology acceptance model: A survey of literature. International Journal
of Business and Social Research, Vol. 2(4), pp. 175-178.
Sverke, M., & Goslinga, S. (2003). The consequences of job insecurity for employers and unions:
Exit, voice and loyalty. Economic and Industrial Democracy, Vol. 24(2), pp. 241-270.
Swanson, E. B. (1982). Measuring user attitudes in MIS research: a review. Omega, Vol. 10(2), pp.
157-165.
Talukder, M. (2012). Factors affecting the adoption of technological innovation by individual
employees: An Australian study. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 40, pp. 52-
57.
Thompson, B. (2004). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Understanding concepts and
applications. Applied Psychological Measurement, Vol. 31(3), pp. 245-248.
Tornatzky, L. G., & Klein, K. J. (1982). Innovation characteristics and innovation adoption-
implementation: A meta-analysis of findings. IEEE Transactions on Engineering
Management, Vol. 29(1), pp. 28-45.
Van Scotter, J. R., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1996). Interpersonal facilitation and job dedication as
separate facets of contextual performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 81(5), pp.
525.
International Journal of Academic Research economics and management sciences
Vol. 9 , No. 1, 2020, E-ISSN: 2226-3624 © 2020 HRMARS
Elst, V. T., De Witte, H., & De Cuyper, N. (2014). The Job Insecurity Scale: A psychometric
evaluation across five European countries. European Journal of Work and Organizational
Psychology, Vol. 23(3), pp. 364-380.
Vieitez, J. C., Carcía, A. D. L. T., & Rodríguez, M. T. V. (2001). Perception of job security in a process
of technological change: Its influence on psychological well-being. Behaviour &
Information Technology, Vol. 20(3), pp. 213-223.
Wanza, S. L., & Nkuraru, J. K. (2016). Influence of Change Management on Employee
Performance: A Case of University of Eldoret, Kenya. International Journal of Business and
Social Science, Vol. 7(4), pp. 190-199.
Werner, J. M. (2000). Implications of OCB and contextual performance for human resource
management. Human Resource Management Review, Vol. 10(1), pp. 3-24.
Witt, L. A., Kacmar, K. M., Carlson, D. S., & Zivnuska, S. (2002). Interactive effects of personality
and organizational politics on contextual performance. Journal of Organizational
Behavior, Vol. 23(8), pp. 911-926.
Yousafzai, S. Y., Foxall, G. R., & Pallister, J. G. (2007). Technology acceptance: a meta-analysis of
the TAM: Part 1, Journal of Modelling in Management, Vol. 2(3), pp. 251-280.
Yusoff, W. T. W., Mat, C. R. C., & Zainol, R. M. (2017). Predictors and consequences of job
insecurity: A preliminary study of Malaysian bank employees. Geografia-Malaysian
Journal of Society and Space, Vol. 10(3), pp. 8-13
Zafar, Q., Ali, A., Hameed, T., Ilyas, T., & Younas, H. (2015). The Influence of Job Stress on
Employees Performance in Pakistan. American Journal of Social Science Research, Vol.
1(4), pp. 221-225.
... Moreover, it serves as a mechanism to enhance the accessibility and precision of tasks. According to Baskaran et al. (2020), technology has become indispensable in every job within the work environment. It plays a crucial role in minimizing human errors, enhancing efficiency, and accelerating communication. ...
... Zhang et al. (2019) explored the influence of management and technological innovation on organizational performance. Baskaran et al. (2020) investigated technology innovation's impact on employee job performance in the Malaysian manufacturing industry, highlighting the positive effects of management and technological innovations. Parry and Battista (2019) studied the impact of emerging technologies on work and the role of the human resource function. ...
... The result is consistent with (Imran et al., 2014) which observed a positive relationship between technology adoption and employee performance and stated that the advancement of technology helps to reduce the workload of the employee and human effort. The result of the study by (Baskaran et al., 2020) also confirms a better understanding of the linkage between technology adoption and employees' performance. ...
Article
Full-text available
This paper examines the effect of new technology adoption on employees' performance among school teachers in the Killagal-Nardevi area. In the study, technology adoption is an independent variable, and employee performance is a dependent variable. Adopting new technology on employees' performance focuses on time management and performance targets for individual employees. The study has used descriptive, relational, and casual research designs considering the research objectives. The study is based on 106 valid responses, 76 percent, of the questionnaire distributed. A total of 29 questionnaires were not returned, and 5 were invalid due to incomplete filling up of the questionnaire. The study is based on the results obtained from descriptive, and inferential tools namely mean, median, standard deviation, correlation, and regression analysis. According to the study's findings, technology adoption has a positive and significant relation to employee performance. Similarly, there is a positive and significant effect of technology adoption. The study, therefore, concludes that as technology tends to be advanced, employee performance is enhanced. Future studies can be conducted considering the broader area along with other variables.
... Attitude toward use refers to the user's favorability or unfavorability toward the use of a particular technology or system. The intention to use is the direct determinant of a user's decision to use a technology or system, serving as a necessary prerequisite for actual behavior (Baskaran et al., 2020). ...
... Therefore, according to the TAM (Technology Acceptance Model), when hotel employees perceive practical benefits and improved work performance value in AI, and find the technological usage process to be straightforward and user-friendly, they are likely to hold a positive attitude toward AI (Marangunić & Granić, 2015;Venkatesh & Davis, 2000). This is because they consider the technology to be useful and easily applicable in their work, leading them to hold a positive attitude towards it (Baskaran et al., 2020). In summary, this study proposes the following hypotheses: ...
Article
Full-text available
Along with the development and application of artificial intelligence technology, intelligent services are also emerging in the travel industry. Especially in the tourism and hotel industry, many organizations have started to introduce AI to assist their employees. The purpose of this study is to explore the effects of employees’ perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use of AI on customer orientation, and further analyze the mediating role of attitudes toward use and the moderating role of a proactive personality. A questionnaire was administered to hotel employees in Liaoning Province, China, and hypothesis testing was conducted using SPSS 24.0 and AMOS 22.0. It was found that the perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use significantly and positively influenced usage attitudes and customer orientation. The usage attitudes mediated between perceived usefulness/perceived ease of use and customer orientation. Proactive personality moderated the effects of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use on usage attitudes. This study not only theoretically enriches the research related to technology acceptance modeling, but also practically provides suggestions for hotel managers to manage their employees after the introduction of AI.
... Extant studies have highlighted some of the factors responsible for employee performance with the existence of digital approaches in the industry. These include employee behavior (Karim, 2015), technological advancement (Baskaran et al., 2020) and employee productivity (Muhammad et al., 2021) as a result of the speed witnessed in the digital space in the corporate settings. Mohlala et al. (2012) further highlighted that the absence of management support further complicates matters for subordinates. ...
Article
Full-text available
Purpose The growing concern with the rapid evolution in adopting emerging technologies in the real estate industry to enhance performance is a threat to conventional practice. The paper aims to examine the latent influence of digital-based technology on employees toward improving organizational performance. Design/methodology/approach The study employed an exploratory research design. The study sampled 132 real estate firms in Lagos State, Nigeria. The study adopts a random sampling method, and only 87 questionnaires were retrieved and found suitable for analysis. The data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Findings The study perceived that the adoption of digital-based tools enhances employee creativity and usage, work ethics, decision-making skills, behaviors and traits toward business performance. Furthermore, firm culture, training and development, assessment of employee productivity metrics, the firm’s expectations and strategic technology applications are significant factors that impact employee decisions to drive organizational performance. Practical implications The study has an implication for the real estate industry in a achieving technology-based performance system by involving employees’ in attaining overall organizational business objectives. Originality/value The paper is relevant because it examines the empirical study of the influence of digital technologies in enhancing employee performance with the goal of enhancing the organization’s competitiveness while maintaining flexible approaches to withstand future business risk and uncertainty.
... Khi hiểu rõ về ý định sử dụng phần mềm lâu dài giúp doanh nghiệp nhận diện được các vấn đề về khả năng thích ứng và chấp nhận công nghệ của nhân viên, từ đó có những chiến lược đào tạo và hỗ trợ kịp thời (Yang, Sun, Zhang, Wang, & Cao, 2017). Hơn nữa, việc nghiên cứu cũng có thể giúp doanh nghiệp hiểu được động lực của nhân viên, từ đó nâng cao mức độ hài lòng trong công việc và giảm tỷ lệ chuyển việc do không thích nghi được với công cụ làm việc (Baskaran, Lay, Ming, & Mahadi, 2020). ...
Article
Full-text available
Sau khi các công ty triển khai hệ thống phần mềm, điều quan trọng là phải khuyến khích người lao động tiếp tục sử dụng chúng. Mục đích của nghiên cứu này là kiểm tra tính hiệu quả của một mô hình tích hợp kết hợp sự phù hợp giữa nhiệm vụ - công nghệ vào lý thuyết liên tục công nghệ (TCT) trong việc làm sáng tỏ lý do tại sao người lao động duy trì việc sử dụng phần mềm của tổ chức. Dữ liệu được thu thập thông qua cuộc khảo sát với 307 người làm việc cho các tổ chức khác nhau đã sử dụng phần mềm trong hoạt động nghề nghiệp của họ. Mô hình phương trình cấu trúc sử dụng bình phương nhỏ nhất từng phần (PLS-SEM) được sử dụng để kiểm tra mô hình nghiên cứu. Ý định tiếp tục sử dụng phần mềm được dự đoán bởi sự hài lòng, thái độ và cảm nhận hữu ích; đồng thời, sự phù hợp giữa công nghệ - công việc ảnh hướng tích cực đến thái độ và sự hài lòng của người dùng phần mềm. Những phát hiện này chỉ ra vai trò của sự phù hợp giữa công nghệ và nhiệm vụ trong bối cảnh các doanh nghiệp áp dụng các phần mềm để tăng hiệu quả kinh doanh trong quá trình chuyển đổi số. Đồng thời, một số hàm ý quản lý khả thi được khuyến nghị cho các doanh nghiệp để có chiến lược triển khai một cách các hệ thống phần mềm trong hoạt động kinh doanh.
... Therefore, in the following paragraphs, the researcher tries to find the basis for this statement in previous studies. Many technological adoption aspects were investigated, including attitudes of individuals, their behaviors, and their acceptance (Baskaran, Lay, Ming, & Mahadi, 2020). Research has delved into its impact on HR functions, as seen in studies by Evseeva, Kalchenko, and Plis (2019) and Savola and Troqe (2019) as well as the pros and cons of different methods used for recruiting and challenges faced by HR managers, as highlighted by Das and Sureshkrishna (2019). ...
Article
Full-text available
This research examines the moderating role of emotional intelligence and HR digitalization on the relationship between compensation and employee job performance in Johor manufacturing sector. The manufacturing sector, which has contributed significantly to the Malaysian national GDP, was among the most affected sectors during the remote work movement caused by several Covid-19. One of the most critical aspects was managing human resources (HR) in remote work and the challenges faced by the employees working online. Drawing upon the Theory of Social Exchange and Ability model of Emotional Intelligence, this practical study investigated the influence of compensation (COM) on employee job performance (EJP) with the moderation of human resource digitalization (HRDi) and emotional intelligence (EI). A quantitative methodology based on online and hard-copy questionnaires was adopted. The population of this study consisted of management employees, such as directors, managers, executives, and administrators working in Johor manufacturing companies. A total of 318 responses was used in this study. Utilising SPSS and Smart PLS, the researcher analysed preliminary and pilot studies, data screening and cleaning procedures, exploratory factor analysis, as well as partial least squares structural equation modeling to assess the relationships among variables and test the hypotheses. The research findings demonstrated that compensation directly affects employee job performance. Meanwhile, human resource digitalization moderates the relationships between compensation and job performance of employees. In addition, emotional intelligence moderates the relationships between compensation and employee job performance. Policymakers are urged to encourage HR digitalization implementation and training on enhancing emotional intelligence. Besides, organizations should have plans on how to enhance their implementation of HR digitalization and improve emotional intelligence.
... Perceived Usefulness is an individual's belief in the extent to which using a specific technology will enhance their job performance [21]. It is a critical determinant in the adaptation of innovation, positing that the greater the perceived benefits of using the technology, the higher the likelihood of its adoption [22]. Specifically, in the context of cloud storage services, as users recognize more advantages in terms of accessibility, efficiency, and productivity gains, the more inclined they are to incorporate cloud storage into their regular activities. ...
Article
Full-text available
The incorporation of cloud storage technology holds the promise of significantly enhancing efficiency in various sectors, particularly from the perspective of Generation Z, a demographic known for its meticulous consideration of technology acceptance factors, especially security. This research thoroughly examines the level of acceptance of cloud storage technology among Generation Z. By augmenting the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) with five core factors and introducing three novel factors—Perceived Security, Perceived Privacy, and Trust—this study not only adheres to traditional acceptance models but also ventures into uncharted territories, marking a significant contribution to understanding technology acceptance. This study meticulously collected data from 408 Generation Z respondents who actively use cloud storage technology, employing an innovative questionnaire disseminated via an online platform. Through sophisticated PLS-SEM data analysis, the study confirmed the positive and significant impact of all tested hypotheses, underscoring the importance of attitudes, perceived benefits, and usability in fostering the intention to use cloud storage. Notably, the added dimensions of privacy and security emerged as critical in enhancing users' trust in cloud storage solutions. Furthermore, this study paves the way for future explorations into technology acceptance across diverse populations and settings, underscoring the critical role of security and privacy in shaping technology adoption decisions among emerging generations.
... Performance encompasses the quantity and quality of output, attendance, helpfulness, accommodation, and timeliness (Badrianto & Ekhsan, 2020;Shahzadi et al., 2014). It involves task accomplishment evaluated against predefined standards of cost, speed, accuracy, and completeness (Afshan et al., 2012;Baskaran et al., 2020;Rozi & Sunarsi, 2020). Performance indicators include work quality, quantity, reliability, attitude, productivity, creativity, and organisational citizenship behaviour (Mangkunegara, 2013). ...
Article
Full-text available
Objective: This study investigates the effect of career management strategies on employee performance within selected insurance companies in Lagos State, Nigeria, aiming to address a research gap in understanding this relationship. Theoretical Framework: Drawing upon Krumboltz's Social Learning Theory, which emphasises the influence of social factors and environmental experiences on career decisions, this study explores how career management practices contribute to employee performance. Method: The study adopted a survey research design. The population was 879 employees of five selected insurance firms. Total enumeration technique was adopted. Primary data were collected using a structured questionnaire. Data collected were analysed using descriptive and simple regressions]. Results and Discussion: Findings revealed that career management had a significant effect on the performance of employees of selected insurance firms in Lagos State, Nigeria (F(4, 833)= 156.914, Adj.R2 = 0.427, p< 0.05). The study concluded that career management has influence and plays an important role in improving the performance of insurance firms in Lagos State, Nigeria. Research Implications: Insurance companies' management should ensure an upward trajectory in their employees' professional journey, including certifying an employee progresses from an entry-level position to management and transitioning from one unit in the organisation to another. Originality/Value: the findings highlight the role of career planning, advancement, mentoring, and performance evaluation in shaping employee outcomes. The regression analysis conducted in this study reveals robust and positive relationships between these career management dimensions and employee performance, indicating that these factors collectively account for a substantial proportion of the variance in performance levels observed among employees.].
... This understanding could help organizations create a more sustainable and supportive work environment (Janjić et al., 2020). Additionally, studying the role of technology in shaping employee performance, especially with increasing automation and digitalization in manufacturing, would be valuable (Baskaran, Lay, Ming, & Mahadi, 2020). Exploring how these technological advancements interact with the Kaizen principles and other factors could provide deeper insights (Lee, 2021). ...
Article
Full-text available
Purpose: This study investigates the relationship between employee performance and productivity in the manufacturing industry, focusing on the impact of Kaizen culture, motivation, and work discipline on employee performance. Research Methodology: The study employed a quantitative method approach, which involved a survey of 105 respondents from the manufacturing Industry in West Java, and the analysis of key performance indicators from several pilot case companies in Bekasi that implemented Kaizen techniques. Data were analyzed using the SmartPLS test. Results: Kaizen culture, motivation, and work discipline are vital for improving employee performance and productivity. Employee motivation directly influences the implementation of the 5S system, and the company meets employees’ needs for career development and information. Employee performance is influenced by motivation, discipline, training, and culture, with productivity as the mediator. Limitations: The generalizability of this study is limited by its focus on a specific industry and geographic location. Future studies should replicate the study across different industries and regions to increase the scope of the findings. Contribution: This study contributes to the current literature by examining how Kaizen culture, motivation, and work discipline boost employee performance and productivity in manufacturing. The results underscore the significance of these elements in enhancing organizational performance and offer practical suggestions for companies that aim to enhance productivity and employee engagement. Originality: This study is unique in its thorough examination of how Kaizen culture, motivation, and work discipline affect employee performance and productivity in manufacturing. Using quantitative methods and diverse data sources enhances originality and offers a deeper understanding of these factors.
Article
This research explores the impact of personal factors on resistance to technology adoption in university libraries in Bangladesh, particularly among LIS (Library and Information Science) professionals. The study aims to reveal specific challenges and opportunities influencing attitudes toward technology integration, offering a nuanced understanding of resistance factors in this unique cultural and educational context. Through a qualitative case study with 21 LIS professionals from seven university libraries, conducted via semi-structured interviews guided by a questionnaire, recurring themes such as fear of job displacement, perceived technological self-efficacy, and concerns about disruptions to workflows emerge. Fear of job displacement refers to professionals’ apprehension about potential job loss due to technological advancements, while perceived technological self-efficacy reflects individuals’ confidence in using and adapting to new technologies. Concerns about disruptions to workflows highlight worries regarding the impact of technology implementation on existing work processes. Despite challenges, participants acknowledge potential benefits, emphasizing improved services. The study advocates for crucial strategies like comprehensive training programs and inclusive decision-making processes to alleviate resistance. This research provides a focused exploration, original insights, and practical value for advancing technology adoption in university libraries in Bangladesh, contributing to a deeper comprehension of complexities in technology integration within academic institutions.
Article
Full-text available
The study focused on the Effect of Employees Contract Engagement on Organisational Performance with respect to First Bank of Nigeria Plc, Abia State. The study used descriptive statistics design. Copies of questionnaire were administered to targeted respondents who are the employees of First Bank of Nigeria Plc in. Abia State. Two objectives of the study are: to determine the effect of terms or conditions of engagement (wages and Health care) on Productivity(output) of First Bank of Nigeria Plc, Abia State. Examine the effect of employees' responsibility(customer retention) on Profit of First Bank of Nigeria Plc, Abia State. The populations of the target respondents were 203 employees, where Taro Yamane was adopted to derive the sample size of 134. Objective one was analyzed using primary data while, objective 2 was analyzed with secondary data gotten from the First Bank of Nigeria PLc Brochure. The findings revealed that; Terms or conditions of engagement (wages and health care) has significant effect on productivity of First Bank of Nigeria Plc, Abia State. Employees' responsibility (customer retention) has significant effect on profit of First Bank of Nigeria Plc, Abia State. Based on the findings, the following recommendations were made; since terms and conditions of engagement is positive to productivity. The management of First Bank of Nigeria Plc in Abia State should continue to improve on the terms or conditions of engaging employees in the bank especially with, respect to employees' contact engagement. It is important to note that the employees' responsibility (customer retention) of First Bank of Nigeria Plc needs to be adopted, the most efficient administrative service that would be beneficial to all her employees' contract engagement and selection policies into the Nigerian banking sector should be unfettered.
Article
Full-text available
The main aim of this paper is to study the factors that could effect the adoption of financial information systems by small and medium-sized enterprises in Jordan based on the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT). This study is quantitative; a questionnaire was used to collect the data. The sample size for the study is 322 small and medium-sized enterprises in Jordan. The findings of the study indicated that performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence and facilitating conditions effect significantly on the adoption of financial information system by small and medium-sized enterprises.
Article
Full-text available
Young workers are often temporarily employed and thus likely to experience job insecurity. This study investigates associations of objective job insecurity (i.e., temporary employment) and subjectively perceived job insecurity with mental health, job satisfaction and life satisfaction among young workers, testing the moderating role of education. The longitudinal analysis based on 1522 labor market entrants from the German Socio-Economic Panel revealed that subjective job insecurity was associated with decreased mental health and lower satisfaction, whereas objective job insecurity was not. Three levels of education were differentiated: university degree, vocational training and low-qualified. There was weak evidence that those with vocational qualifications were more vulnerable to subjective job insecurity than either the low-qualified or university graduates. The results suggest that irrespective of education, detrimental consequences of subjective job insecurity emerge early in the career. Access to secure employment should be improved for young workers to prevent early dissatisfaction and impairment of their mental health.
Article
Full-text available
Paid work is of fundamental importance in modern societies. For individuals, it serves not only to provide them with a means of financial income but also plays an important role in determining social status and prestige. Based on a quantitative study of 141 bank employees, this paper empirically explores the predictors and consequences of job insecurity components among bank employees in Malaysia. The main purpose of this study is to investigate the role of job security satisfaction in predicting organizational commitment and job performance among bank employees in Malaysia. Furthermore, the study explores the contribution of certain demographic variables such as monthly income, age, marital status, education level, job level, tenure in present job and tenure in present organization, as well as organizational factors such as an organization's activity and training for explaining variations in the levels of satisfaction with job security among individuals. This study suggests that the relationships between job security satisfaction and both organizational commitment and job performance should provide managers with valuable information for developing plans to inspire and retain organizational commitment and to enhance employees' performance.
Article
Full-text available
The purpose of this paper is to allow researchers, instructors, and students to comprehend the nature of exploratory factor analysis (EFA) from marketing perspective. In particular, the paper offer realistic information from marketing literature on developing valid instruments and making decision regarding factor extraction, factor rotation, and factor labeling. Since the items and factors identified through EFAs are using as an input for the measurement model in second generation structural equation modeling (SEM) technique. While so doing, a pilot test was conducted and items from marketing literature were analyzed via principal component analysis (PCA) using SPSS 20, the appropriateness of data for EFA was measured through KMO and Bartlett’s test of Sphericity. Based on parallel analysis three factors were extracted for further investigation. The three components explained a total of 62.6% of the variance.
Article
The technology acceptance model has been a theory that is most widely used to explain an individual's acceptance of an information system. This study has reviewed numerous literatures available in this area. The different studies in this area were evaluated to understand the modifications that were done on this model. The paper then tries to provide an insight on future trends in the technology acceptance model. Keywords: Technology acceptance model; perceived ease of use; attitude; Perceived Usefulness Introduction: In the area of research to investigate the individual acceptance behavior on Information technology and Information systems, many models were suggested by the researchers. These include the Theory of Reasoned action (TRA), Theory of planned behavior (TPB), Technology Acceptance Model (TAM, TAM2) and Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT). According to theory of reasoned action the individual behavior is motivated by behavioral objectives and these are a function of an individual's attitude toward the behavior and subjective norms surrounding the performance of the behavior. Technology acceptance mode (TAM) has been based on theory of reasoned action (TRA) and has been used to explain individual's acceptance behavior.TAM was first proposed by Davis(1989) in his Doctoral thesis. Theory of Planned Behavior helps to recognize how the behavior of people can be changed. TPB suggests that human action is guided by three factors which are behavioral, normative and control beliefs.TPB includes some factors that are part of TAM. However, TPB is not specific Information systems usage (IS). The perceived usefulness factor and perceived ease of use factors are major factors in computer use behaviors based on Technology acceptance model. TAM has been widely used to scrutinize individual technology acceptance behavior in various types of information systems. Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) Technology Acceptance Model has been developed by Davis(1989) is one of the most popular research models to predict use and acceptance of information systems and technology by individual users.TAM has been widely studied and verified by different studies that examine the individual technology acceptance behavior in different information systems constructs. In TAM model, there are two factors perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use is relevant in computer use behaviors. Davis defines perceived usefulness as the prospective user's subjective probability that using a specific application system will enhance his or her job or life performance. Perceive ease of use (EOU) can be defined as the degree to which the prospective user expects the target system to be free of effort. According to TAM, ease of use and perceived usefulness are the
Article
Information security is an important activity which is vital for corporate or organizational activities. However, focusing only on the strengthening for the performance of information security may act as a factor increasing the techno-stress the members of the organization feel. This study inquired into the impacts of information security techno-stress on individual job satisfaction and empirically verified the relationship between information security techno-stress and individual job satisfaction, preceding factors and results, regarding how to use information security effectively. The results of the analysis, the strengthening of information security caused techno-stress, and the information security techno-stress had negative impacts on individual jot satisfaction. As security is inclined to technical countermeasures, security technology is further strengthened, and accordingly, the techno-stress of the members of the organization increases, while on the other hand, individual job efficiently decreases, which is judged that this will have negative impacts on the personal performance in the organization.
Article
There are many variables that affect the performance of employees at work place. These variables include manager's attitude, organizational culture, personal problems, job content and financial rewards. All of these variables have positive impact on the performance of the employees except personal problems of the employees that hinders the performance of the employees. This study is quantitative in nature and will see the effect of these variables manager's attitude, organizational culture, personal problems, job content and financial rewards in the banking sector of Pakistan focusing Sahiwal banks as a sample based on 200 employees. The study will be analyzed by applying multiple regression analysis using SPSS software because there are 5 independent variables and their affects have to be seen on the performance of the employees which is the sole dependent variable.