The Rational Climate e-Book (2nd Edition)
Abstract
The second edition, is available (regularly check for updates)
======================================================================
Poyet, P., 2022. The Rational Climate e-Book: Cooler is Riskier. The Extended 2nd Edition, October 5th, 174 Figures, 261 Equations, 2432 references, 655 pp., e-ISBN 978-99957-1-929-6
======================================================================
The Final First Edition (FFE) was issued on the 19th of April 2021, with DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.28648.80640
======================================================================
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/351348366_The_Rational_Climate_e-Book_-_Final_First_Edition.pdf
======================================================================
This book addresses all aspects of climate and paleo-climates, from atmospheric physics, to astronomical influences and geological and geochemical drivers. It covers the computer models claiming to simulate the climate and the policies that are projected from them.
You can get the pdf for free here.
If you like, recommend and make it known to others.
Share as much as you can.
Best.
======================================================================
I have been interested in Planetology for 50 years and observed all the planets as a child with a small telescope. I was fascinated by these distant worlds about which not so much was known in the early seventies. Having access later to the great refractor of the Nice observatory (76 cm) gave me a better perspective on these magnificent celestial bodies and as any astronomer knows, clear sky nights are much colder than those that are overcast. So, it has long seemed logical to me to invoke greenhouse gases to explain that the temperature was enhanced by them. Of course, the warmer nights are of little consolation to the astronomer if they are cloudy, but as soon as the sky clears the temperature drops, you'd better have an appropriate equipment as telescopes are located on top of mountains to have dry air and no light pollution. So, I was not particularly skeptic about the global warming narrative, as warming since the end of the Little Ice Age was obvious, but becoming later a geochemist and a computer scientist I knew two things : the Earth-system is huge and extraordinarily complex and software can deliver whatever results one has programmed them for. Then, later being interested ever more into what drives the climate on planets, I became more suspicious about the way some conjectures were awkwardly imposed as supposedly evidences. The more we knew, the more the discrepancies between the packaged discourse and the scientific observations grew.The greenhouse effect on Venus did not match the observations for a number of reasons, Mars was desperately cold despite its 96.5% of CO2 in its atmosphere and the more one was observing how IPCC was being operated, the more suspicious any experienced scientist had to become. When François Hollande (a former French President) stated at the 70th session of the UN General Assembly in New York, on September 28, 2015 that tsunamis and earthquakes will be the result of uncontrolled anthropogenic global warming, that was simply too delirious to hear for a geologist. Learning from a politician that plate tectonics were now going to be driven by the action of a trace gas, because a 100 ppm increase of it had been recorded, was such a flabbergasting statement that I was not suspicious any longer but resentful of the way science was tortured to match a political agenda. I had been accumulating and reading thousands of papers on that subject over the years, but Covid time was the trigger, it was long overdue to put back science in the first place, to remind in Chapter 1 what science teaches us, from Physics to Planetology, Geology etc, to evaluate in Chapter 2 the computer models that are presented as the only evidence of a human fingerprint on the current modern warming and to address in Chapter 3 the net-zero dystopian world that is going to be implemented if the public does not raise itself against the green tyranny. Chapter 4 summarizes and explains why a warmer world is better anyway and addresses the question of whether the current climate optimum has anything special. You won't be disappointed, everything is revisited from scratch.
Supplementary resource (1)
... Several publications suggesting that most of the sources of the atmospheric CO2 are unrelated to human activity, Harde (2019) [62]; Berry (2021) [63]. Recent estimate of the man-made contribution to the observed ~35 % changes is only about 6 %, Poyet (2022) [24]. From our point of view this problem is irrelevant, and in fact we try to focus on the real problem of establishing the theoretical relationships between the atmospheric GHG content and the surface radiative temperature. ...
Greenhouse effect and climate change
... Several publications suggesting that most of the sources of the atmospheric CO2 are unrelated to human activity, Harde (2019) [62]; Berry (2021) [63]. Recent estimate of the man-made contribution to the observed ~35 % changes is only about 6 %, Poyet (2022) [24]. From our point of view this problem is irrelevant, and in fact we try to focus on the real problem of establishing the theoretical relationships between the atmospheric GHG content and the surface radiative temperature. ...
In the last decade fundamental theoretical equations were developed for describing and understanding the global average radiative equilibrium state of the Earth-atmosphere system. It is shown that using the well-established laws of radiation physics the key climate parameters of the planet can be deduced theoretically, from purely astrophysical considerations and some plausible assumptions on the material composition of the planetary surface and the structure of the atmosphere. It is also shown, that the Earth-atmosphere system is in radiative equilibrium with a theoretical solar constant, and all global mean flux density components satisfy the theoretical expectations. The greenhouse effect predicted by the Arrhenius greenhouse theory is inconsistent with the existence of this radiative equilibrium. Hence, the CO2 greenhouse effect as used in the current global warming hypothesis is impossible. The greenhouse effect itself and the CO2 greenhouse effect based global warming hypothesis is a politically motivated dangerous artifact without any theoretical or empirical footing. Planet Earth obeys the most fundamental laws of radiation physics .
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any references for this publication.