ArticlePDF Available

Abstract and Figures

Otolith morphology is a widely accepted tool for species identification in teleost fish, but whether this holds true for very small species remains to be explored. Here, the saccular otoliths of the cryptobenthic Mediterranean clingfish Gouania (Gobiesocidae) are described for the first time. Our new data, although preliminary, indicate that otolith morphology and morphometry support the recognition of the recently differentiated five species of Gouania in the Mediterranean Sea. Furthermore, otoliths of phylogenetically closely related Gouania species resemble each other more than do those of the more distantly related species. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Content may be subject to copyright.
BRIEF COMMUNICATION
First documentation of the otoliths of the species of Gouania
(Teleostei: Gobiesocidae) in the Mediterranean Sea
Eleni A. Charmpila
1
| Maximilian Wagner
2,3
| Bettina Reichenbacher
1,4
1
Department of Earth and Environmental
Sciences, Palaeontology and Geobiology,
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München,
Munich, Germany
2
Institute of Biology, University of Graz, Graz,
Austria
3
Department of Biology, University of
Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
4
GeoBio-Center, Ludwig-Maximilians-
Universität München, Munich, Germany
Correspondence
Bettina Reichenbacher, Department for Earth
and Environmental Sciences, Palaeontology
and Geobiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-
Universität München, Richard-Wagner-Str. 10,
D-80333 München, Germany.
Email: b.reichenbacher@lrz.uni-muenchen.de
Funding information
Austrian Academy of Science; Austrian
Research Association; University of Graz
Abstract
Otolith morphology is a widely accepted tool for species identification in teleost fish,
but whether this holds true for very small species remains to be explored. Here,
the saccular otoliths of the cryptobenthic Mediterranean clingfish Gouania
(Gobiesocidae) are described for the first time. The new data, although preliminary,
indicate that otolith morphology and morphometry support the recognition of
the recently differentiated five species of Gouania in the Mediterranean Sea.
Furthermore, otoliths of phylogenetically closely related Gouania species resemble
each other more than do those of the more distantly related species.
KEYWORDS
clingfish, ecomorphotypes, Mediterranean, otolith morphology
The name clingfishcollectively refers to small, cosmopolitan species of
the family Gobiesocidae found in intertidal (and freshwater) environ-
ments. The term itself derives from the fact that they attach themselves
to the substrate by means of a ventrally located adhesive disc
(Briggs, 1955; Conway et al., 2017, 2019). Their unusual lifestyle and
smallbodysizeexplainwhytheyaregenerallyconsideredas
cryptobenthic, which in turn suggests that clingfish biodiversity has been
underestimated (Brandl et al., 2018; Wagner et al., 2019, 2020). Within
the Gobiesocidae, this applies in particular to the genus Gouania Risso
1810, which originally included only the species Gouania willdenowi.Nev-
ertheless, recent results from molecular and morphometric analyses
suggested that this endemic Mediterranean genus comprises four addi-
tional species (Wagner et al., 2019) and led to the taxonomic revision of
the genus (Wagner et al., 2020). Accordingly, (a) the species name
G. willdenowi Risso 1810 should be reserved for clingfish inhabiting the
western Mediterranean coasts, (b) two further species are present in the
Adriatic (Gouania pigra Nardo 1827 and Gouania adriatica Wagner
et al., 2020) and (c) two additional species occur in the eastern Mediter-
ranean (Gouania hofrichteri Wagner et al., 2020, and Gouania orientalis
Wagner et al., 2020). Notably, in both the latter regions, the two species
are congruent with two morphotypes one slender bodied with a small
head and the other stout bodied with a larger head which suggests
convergent evolution (Wagner et al., 2019).
Otoliths form three pairs of calcium carbonate structures in the
inner ear of teleosts (Popper et al., 2005). The saccular otoliths, usu-
ally the largest of the three pairs, are widely used for the identification
of species, as the morphology of most saccular otoliths has been
shown to be species specific (Nolf, 1985, 2013; Reichenbacher &
Reichard, 2014; Tuset et al., 2008). Hitherto, the otoliths of only a few
species of Gobiesocidae fossil or extant have been studied, mainly
from the genus Lepadogaster Goüan 1770 (Schwarzhans et al., 2017;
Smale et al., 1995; Tuset et al., 2008). Here, the saccular otoliths of
Gouania are described for the first time and compared between the
five species to examine the congruence between genetic data,
morphotypes and overall otolith morphology.
In total, 22 saccular otoliths were extracted from 12 specimens
2 representatives of Lepadogaster lepadogaster Bonnaterre 1788 (from
St. Baska, Croatia, and Agni Beach, Corfu, Greece), 2 specimens of
Received: 19 March 2020 Accepted: 8 December 2020
DOI: 10.1111/jfb.14646
FISH
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any
medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
© 2020 The Authors. Journal of Fish Biology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Fisheries Society of the British Isles.
J Fish Biol. 2021;16. wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/jfb 1
G. willdenowi from the western Mediterranean (Messina, Italy), 2 speci-
mens of each species from the Adriatic Sea (G. pigra and G. adriatica,
Glavotok, Otok Krk, Croatia) and 2 specimens of each species from the
eastern Mediterranean Sea (G. hofrichteri from Kapsali, Greece, and
G. orientalis from the Gulf of Corinth, Greece). See Supporting Information
for details on specimens and sites. The same set of specimens was used
in the molecular study published by Wagner et al. (2019, 2020).
Ethical statement: Fish collection and euthanasia were carried out
with the approval of the Ethics Committee of the University of Graz
(permit number: GZ. 39/54/63 ex 2019/20) and in accordance with
EU Directive 2010/63/EU, Annex IV, and the Austrian Animal Experi-
mentation Ordinance, §20.
Left and right saccular otoliths (termed otolithsin the following)
were extracted dorsally, and residual tissues were removed by immer-
sion in 1% KOH solution for 3 h. The otoliths were then rinsed in dis-
tilled water for 4 h; if necessary, the procedure was repeated, and the
otoliths were stored in distilled water overnight. Scanning electron
microscopy (SEM) images of all otoliths were obtained using a
HITACHI SU 5000 Schottky FE-SEM at the Department of Earth and
Environmental Sciences (Ludwig-Maximilians- Universität München,
Munich). Otoliths were mounted on aluminium pin stubs (12.5 mm in
diameter, 3.2 ×8 mm), to which adhesive tabs had already been
applied. A thin (20 nm) coating of gold was applied to the stubs (sput-
ter coating) in a high-vacuum coater. The pin stubs were then inserted
into the imaging system, and current (15 kV) was applied.
Morphological descriptions and otolith morphometry were based
on SEM images of all otoliths. The images were processed using
Adobe Photoshop. Figure 1A,B shows the otolith terminology and
morphometry used in this study. SEM images were oriented so that
the ventral margin of the otolith was essentially horizontal (Figure 1A,
B). For otolith morphometry, eight distances were measured from the
otolith images using Image J (Schneider et al., 2012): otolith length
(OL), otolith height (OH), sulcus length (SuL), sulcus height (SuH),
ostium length (OstL), cauda length (CaudL), rostrum length (RoL) and
rostrum height (RoH) (Figure 1B). All distances were measured to the
nearest 0.001 mm. In addition, the perimeter (P) and area (A) of each
otolith were determined (in mm and mm
2
, respectively). To measure
the lengths and heights of the otolith and sulcus, rectangles enclosing
the dorsal-most, ventral-most, anterior-most and posterior-most
points of the two structures were drawn (Figure 1B). The horizontal
and vertical edges of these rectangles were then taken to represent
the dimensions of interest. Ten otolith variables were calculated
according to Tuset et al. (2003), Reichenbacher et al. (2007) and Gierl
et al. (2018) (Figure 2; Table 1, Supporting Information). The outcome
of the morphometric measurements was then transformed into
descriptive statistics using Past (Hammer et al., 2001).
A summary of the otolith characters and morphometric results of
all studied otoliths is provided in Table 1. The general otolith outline
and sulcus traits are largely similar among the otoliths of G. willdenowi
and those of the four recently (re)described species from the Adriatic
and the eastern Mediterranean Sea (Figure 1C). The otolith outline is
oval to elliptical to slightly triangular; the anterior region is usually
blunt, and the posterior region is round. The sulcus acusticus has a
median to slightly supramedian position and is adjoined by well-
developed thickened (swollen) cristae that cover the entire (or almost
the entire) inner portion of the sulcus. The ostium extends to the anterior
margin (=heterosulcoid opening according to Tuset et al., 2008), and it is
separated from the cauda by a prominent structure, the collum. The
ostium is tubular in shape; the cauda is slightly shorter than the ostium
and round to oval in outline. The cauda is straight to slightly inclining and
ends far from the posterior margin. The rostrum is mostly short, round
and broad, whereas the antirostrum is usually absent or poorly defined.
The excisura is narrow and shallow. All otoliths are thick and robust and
exhibit a thicker posterior region when viewed from the ventral side (not
shown). Most of the otolith variables examined indicate overlapping
ranges among the five Gouania species, although there are some excep-
tions (see following text and Table 1).
The otoliths of L. lepadogaster are elliptical to trapezoid in outline
(Figure 1D). The rostrum is well developed. The main morphological
differences compared to the Gouania species are the (relatively) longer
sulcus (in % of OL, see Table 1), the reduced RoH (in % of OH, see
Table 1; Figure 2d) and the absence of swollencristae on the inner
portion of the sulcus (see Figure 1D). In addition, the ranges of the
otolith variable circularitydiffer between Lepadogaster and all other
groups (Table 1; Figure 2a).
As the sample available for each species was small (and the body
sizes of specimens varied within and among groups), no conclusions
could be drawn with regard to within-species variability of the
otoliths such as sexual dimorphism (Teimori et al., 2020; Vaux
et al., 2019), ontogenetic variation (Vignon, 2012; Więcaszek
et al., 2020) or asymmetry between right and left otoliths (Lord
et al., 2012; Lychakov et al., 2008; Panfili et al., 2005). Nonetheless,
some preliminary remarks can be made based on the comparison
between otolith groups. It was observed that the otoliths of G. pigra
and those of G. willdenowi exhibit greater resemblance to each other
than to the otoliths from the other species with respect to circularity
(Figure 2a), RoL (% OL) and RoH (% OH) (Figure 2c,d) and also based
on overall comparison of their SEM images [Figure 1C(ad)]. Only the
ratio of OstL to CaudL indicated non-overlapping ranges (Table 1).
This high similarity is compatible with their sister relationship
according to molecular data (Wagner et al., 2019; see Figure 2f). The
otoliths of the two stout morphotypes (G. adriatica and G. orientalis)
also exhibit close similarity with each other with regard to the
aforementioned otolith variables (circularity, RoL and height) and little
overlap with the other groups (Table 1; Figure 2a,c,d), which is again
consistent with their sister relation based on molecular data
(Figure 2f). In the case of the two slender morphotypes (G. pigra and
G. hofrichteri), the otolith variables circularity, rectangularity, RoL
(% OL) and RoH (% OH) display no overlap in range (Table 1;
Figure 2ad). This implies possible differentiation between their oto-
lith morphologies, in spite of their similarity in body shape, and thus
supports the notion that G. pigra and G. hofrichteri are not closely
related and that their slender body shapes result from convergent
evolution (see Figure 2f). On the contrary, rectangularitywas the
only variable that separated the otoliths of G. hofrichteri, the eastern
Mediterranean slender type, from almost all other otolith groups (the
2CHARMPILA ET AL.
FISH
FIGURE 1 Otolith morphology of the clingfish species studied here (left and right sagittal otoliths, inner face). (A) Left otolith of Gouania pigra
(GWK_03) with otolith nomenclature used in this study. (B) Left otolith of Gouania adriatica (GWK_05) with measurements according to
Reichenbacher et al. (2007) and Gierl et al. (2018). (C) Otoliths of Gouania species; (a, b) Gouania willdenowi, specimen numbers GWM_06,
GWM_05; (c, d) Gouania pigra (=slender ecomorphotype from the Adriatic), specimen numbers GWK_13, GWK_03; (e, f) Gouania adriatica (=stout
ecomorphotype from the Adriatic), specimen numbers GWK-01, GWK_05; (g, h) Gouania hofrichteri (=slender morphotype from the eastern
Mediterranean), specimen numbers KYT_22, KYT_23; (i, j) Gouania orientalis (=stout morphotype from the eastern Mediterranean), specimen
numbers GOK_38, GOK_37. (D) Otoliths of Lepadogaster lepadogaster; (k, l) specimen numbers LepKrk7, LGCorf_21. Abbreviations: CaudL, caudal
length; OH, otolith height; OL, otolith length; OstL, ostium length; RoH, rostrum height; RoL, rostrum length; SuH, sulcus height; SuL, sulcus
length
CHARMPILA ET AL.3
FISH
single exception being the stout eastern Mediterranean morphotype,
G. orientalis) (Table 1; Figure 2b). Based on the genetic analyses
reported by Wagner et al. (2019), a higher degree of divergence of
G. hofrichteri from all other groups would be expected.
The results of this study, although preliminary, are largely in
accordance with the genetic results in Wagner et al. (2019). It is
suggested that further exploration of otolith morphology from the
five Gouania species could provide additional support for species
FIGURE 2 (ae) Summary of the results of otolith morphometry of the studied Gouania specimens, [n] indicates the number of otoliths that
could be used for the measurements; (f) phylogenetic tree modified from Wagner et al. (2019). stout and slender
4CHARMPILA ET AL.
FISH
TABLE 1 Description of otolith morphology based on specific otolith characters and ranges of the measured otolith variables among the five species of Gouania and Lepadogaster lepadogaster
Gouania willdenowi, n =3 Gouania pigra, n =4 Gouania adriatica, n =4 Gouania hofrichteri, n =3 Gouania orientalis, n =4 Lepadogaster lepadogaster,n=4
Shape outline Oval to elliptic Oval to elliptic Elliptic to triangular Elliptic squared Elliptic Elliptic to trapezoid
Sulcus position Median Median Median Median Median Median
Sulcus type Ostial Ostial Ostial Ostial Ostial Ostial
Sulcus opening Heterosulcoid Heterosulcoid Heterosulcoid Heterosulcoid Heterosulcoid Heterosulcoid
Ostium shape Tubular Tubular Tubular, slightly
wider towards
the opening
Tubular Tubular Tubular
Cauda shape Round oval Round oval Round oval Round oval Round oval Round oval
Cauda position Ending far from the
posterior margin
Ending far from the
posterior margin
Ending far from the
posterior margin
Ending far
from the
posterior margin
Ending far from the
posterior margin
Ending far from the
posterior margin
Cauda curvature Straight Straight Straight Straight Straight Straight
Collum Solid bridge Solid bridge Solid bridge Solid bridge Solid bridge Solid bridge
Excisura Very narrow, shallow Very narrow, shallow Narrow, shallow Narrow, shallow notched Slightly deep
notched, narrow
Narrow, shallow notched
Rostrum Very short, round, broad Very short, round, broad Long, round, broad Long, round, broad Short, round, broad Long, round to pointed
Antirostrum Absent Poorly defined Poorly defined Poorly defined or absent Short, round, broad Absent
Otolith margins Smooth Smooth Smooth Smooth Smooth Smooth
Posterior region Round Round Round to oblique Round Round Round to oblique
Cristae Well developed Well developed Well developed Well developed Well developed Less well developed
Otolith height (in % OL) 57.38363.594 59.56564.465 55.55657.876 54.57760.000 56.43860.521 59.86163.808
Rostrum height (in % OH) 52.05855.797 32.43959.500 53.83160.412 62.73967.647 52.33068.024 40.51548.519
Rostrum length (in % OL) 9.6049.985 2.98711.433 15.19519.015 17.86319.014 10.59023.210 8.57614.429
Sulcus height (in % OH) 35.02435.351 34.75042.265 37.58542.944 33.22635.987 31.54137.740 35.30839.578
Sulcus length (in % OL) 62.98064.318 60.22067.835 58.53462.468 60.19662.852 59.80661.733 68.89575.000
Ostium length (in % SuL) 55.85456.490 45.55054.831 53.62056.531 49.83758.523 50.90357.505 49.79858.857
Caudal length (in % SuL) 43.51048.000 45.16954.450 43.46946.380 41.47750.163 42.49549.097 41.14350.202
Ratio ostium
length/cauda length
1.2651.298 0.8371.214 1.1561.300 0.9941.411 1.0371.353 0.9921.431
Circularity 15.70316.391 15.63216.423 16.74217.746 17.10617.205 16.77419.039 16.49916.737
Rectangularity 0.1280.205 0.1010.130 0.1440.175 0.0720.076 0.0540.184 0.1330.144
Note: Each species was represented by two specimens, of which both the right and left otoliths (sagitta) were extracted, except in the case of one specimen of G. willdenowi and G. hofrichteri (one otolith was
lost). Bold font indicates character differences between at least two species; circularity was calculated as (P
2
/A)(P, perimeter; A, area), and rectangularity was calculated as [A/(OL ×OH)]. n: number of otoliths;
OH: otolith height; OL: otolith length; SuL: sulcus length.
CHARMPILA ET AL.5
FISH
differentiation within Gouania. Finally, this study contributes to the
expansion of the hitherto-limited clingfish otolith record and offers
new insights into the otolith morphology of the group.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank Sandra Bracˇun (Morska Škola Pula, Croatia), Robert
Hofrichter (Mare Mundi, Austria), Samuel P. Iglesias (Muséum
National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris, France), Enerit Sacdanaku
(University of Tirana, Albania) and Stamatis Zogaris (Hellenic Center
for Marine Research, Greece) for their help with sampling and/or
obtaining sampling permits; Paul Hardy (Düsseldorf, Germany) for crit-
ical reading of the manuscript; and two anonymous reviewers for their
constructive remarks. This work was supported in part by the Austrian
Research Association (ÖFG, to M.W.), the University of Graz (KUWI
stipend & Heinrich-Jörg Foundation, to M.W.) and the Austrian Acad-
emy of Science (ÖAW DOC Scholarship, to M.W.).
ORCID
Bettina Reichenbacher https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6678-5080
REFERENCES
Brandl, S. J., Goatley, C. H. R., Bellwood, D. R., & Tornabene, L. (2018). The hid-
den half: Ecology and evolution of cryptobenthic fishes on coral reefs. Bio-
logical Reviews,93(4), 18461873. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12423.
Briggs, J. C. (1955). A monograph of the clingfishes (order Xenopterygii).
Stanford Ichthyological Bulletin,6,1224.
Conway, K. W., Kim, D., Ruber, L., Espinosa Perez, H. S., & Hastings, P. A.
(2017). Molecular systematics of the New World clingfish genus
Gobiesox (Teleostei: Gobiesocidae) and the origin of a freshwater
clade. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution,112, 138147. https://
doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2017.04.024.
Conway, K. W., Moore, G. I., & Summers, A. P. (2019). A new genus and
two new species of miniature clingfishes from temperate southern
Australia (Teleostei, Gobiesocidae). Zookeys,864,3565. https://doi.
org/10.3897/zookeys.864.34521.
Gierl, C., Liebl, D., Šanda, R., Vuki
c, J., Esmaeili, H. R., & Reichenbacher, B.
(2018). What can goby otolith morphology tell us? (Que révèle la mor-
phologie des otolithes de gobies?). Cybium,42(4), 349363. https://
doi.org/10.26028/cybium/2018-424-006.
Hammer, Ø., Harper, D. A. T., & Ryan, P. D. (2001). PAST: Paleontological
statistics software package for education and data analysis.
Palaeontologia Electronica,4(1), 19.
Lord, C., Morat, F., Lecomte-Finiger, R., & Keith, P. (2012). Otolith shape
analysis for three Sicyopterus (Teleostei: Gobioidei: Sicydiinae) species
from New Caledonia and Vanuatu. Environmental Biology of Fishes,93
(2), 209222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-011-9907-y.
Lychakov, D. V., Rebane, Y. T., Lombarte, A., Demestre, M., & Fuiman, L. A.
(2008). Saccular otolith mass asymmetry in adult flatfishes. Journal of
Fish Biology,72, 25792594.
Nolf, D. (1985). Handbook of paleoichthyology, volume 10, Otolithi piscium.
München, Germany: Verlag Dr. Friedrich Pfeil.
Nolf, D. (2013). The diversity of fish otoliths, past and present. Brussels, Bel-
gium: Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences.
Panfili, J., Durand, J.-D., Diop, K., Gourène, B., & Simier, M. (2005). Fluctu-
ating asymmetry in fish otoliths and heterozygosity in stressful estua-
rine environments (West Africa). Marine & Freshwater Research,56(5),
505516. https://doi.org/10.1071/MF04138.
Popper, A. N., Ramcharitar, J., & Campana, S. E. (2005). Why otoliths?
Insights from inner ear physiology and fisheries biology. Marine & Fresh-
water Research,56(5), 497504. https://doi.org/10.1071/MF04267.
Reichenbacher, B., & Reichard, M. (2014). Otoliths of five extant species of
the annual killifish Nothobranchius from the east African savannah. PLoS
One,9(11), e112459. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0112459.
Reichenbacher, B.,Sienknecht, U., Küchenhoff, H., & Fenske, N. (2007). Com-
bined otolith morphology and morphometry for assessing taxonomy and
diversity in fossil and extant killifish (Aphanius,Prolebias). Journal of Mor-
phology,268(10), 898915. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmor.10561.
Schneider, C. A., Rasband, W. S., & Eliceiri, K. W. (2012). NIH image to
ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nature Methods,9(7), 671675.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2089.
Schwarzhans, W., Carnevale, G., Japundzic, S., & Bradic-Milinovic, K. (2017).
Otoliths in situ from Sarmatian (middle Miocene) fishes of the Paratethys.
Part IV: Scorpaenidae, Labridae, and Gobiesocidae. Swiss Journal of Pal-
aeontology,136(1), 93108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13358-017-0124-y.
Smale, M. J., Watson, G., & Hecht, T. (Eds.). (1995). Otolith atlas of southern
African marine fishes. Grahamstown, South Africa: J. L. B. Smith Insti-
tute of Ichthyology.
Teimori, A., Iranmanesh, N., Askari Hesni, M., & Motamedi, M. (2020). Within-
and among-population differentiation of Aphaniops hormuzensis from eco-
logically diverse environments (Cyprinodontiformes; Aphaniidae). Acta
Zoologica.117. https://doi.org/10.1111/azo.12350.
Tuset, V. M., Lombarte, A., & Assis, C. A. (2008). Otolith atlas for the west-
ern Mediterranean, north and central eastern Atlantic. Scientia Marina,
72(S1), 7198.
Tuset,V.M.,Lozano,I.J.,Gonzalez,J.A.,Pertusa,J.F.,&Garcia-Diaz,M.M.
(2003). Shape indices to identify regional differences in otolith morphology
of comber, Serranus cabrilla (L., 1758). Journal of Applied Ichthyology,19(2),
8893. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0426.2003.00344.x.
Vaux,F.,Rasmuson,L.K.,Kautzi,L.A.,Rankin,P.S.,Blume,M.T.O.,
Lawrence, K. A., O'Malley, K. G. (2019). Sex matters: Otolith shape and
genomic variation in deacon rockfish (Sebastes diaconus). Ecology and Evo-
lution,9(23), 1315313173. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5763.
Vignon, M. (2012). Ontogenetic trajectories of otolith shape during shift in
habitat use: Interaction between otolith growth and environment.
Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology,420-421,26
32.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2012.03.021.
Wagner, M., Bracun, S., Skofitsch, G., Kovacic, M., Zogaris, S.,
Iglesias, S. P., Koblmueller, S. (2019). Diversification in gravel
beaches: A radiation of interstitial clingfish (Gouania, Gobiesocidae) in
the Mediterranean Sea. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution,139,
106525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2019.106525.
Wagner, M., Kovacˇi
c, M., & Koblmüller, S. (2020). Unravelling the taxon-
omy of an interstitial fish radiation: Three new species of Gouania
(Teleostei: Gobiesocidae) from the Mediterranean Sea and redescrip-
tions of G. willdenowi and G. pigra.Journal of Fish Biology.125.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.14558.
Więcaszek, B., Nowosielski, A., Dąbrowski, J., Górecka, K., Keszka, S., &
Strzelczak, A. (2020). Fish size effect on sagittal otolith outer shape
variability in round goby Neogobius melanostomus (Pallas 1814). Journal
of Fish Biology,97(5), 15201541. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.14521.
SUPPORTING INFORMATION
Additional supporting information may be found online in the
Supporting Information section at the end of this article.
How to cite this article: Charmpila EA, Wagner M,
Reichenbacher B. First documentation of the otoliths of the
species of Gouania (Teleostei: Gobiesocidae) in the
Mediterranean Sea. J Fish Biol. 2021;16. https://doi.org/10.
1111/jfb.14646
6CHARMPILA ET AL.
FISH
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
The clingfish (Gobiesocidae) genus Gouania (Nardo 1833) is endemic to the Mediterranean Sea and inhabits, unlike any other vertebrate species in Europe, the harsh intertidal environment of gravel beaches. Following up on a previous phylogenetic study, we revise the diversity and taxonomy of this genus, by analysing a comprehensive set of morphological (meristics, morphometrics, micro computed tomography imaging), geographical and genetic (DNA‐barcoding) data. We provide descriptions of three new species, G. adriatica sp. nov., G. orientalis sp. nov., G. hofrichteri sp. nov. as well as re‐descriptions of G. willdenowi (Risso 1810) and G. pigra (Nardo 1827) and assign neotypes for the latter two species. In addition to elucidating the complex taxonomic situation of Gouania, we discuss the potential of this enigmatic clingfish genus for further ecological, evolutionary and biodiversity studies that might unravel even more diversity in this unique Mediterranean fish radiation.
Article
Full-text available
Little is known about intraspecific variation within the deacon rockfish (Sebastes diaconus), a recently described species found in the northeast Pacific Ocean. We investigated population structure among fish sampled from two nearshore reefs (Siletz Reef and Seal Rock) and one offshore site (Stonewall Bank) within a <50‐km2 area off the Oregon coast. Fish from the three sample sites exhibited small but statistically significant differences based on genetic variation at >15,000 neutral loci, whether analyzed independently or classified into nearshore and offshore groups. Male and females were readily distinguished using genetic data and 92 outlier loci were associated with sex, potentially indicating differential selection between males and females. Morphometric results indicated that there was significant secondary sexual dimorphism in otolith shape, but further sampling is required to disentangle potential confounding influence of age. This study is the first step toward understanding intraspecific variation within the deacon rockfish and the potential management implications. Since differentiation among the three sample sites was small, we consider the results to be suggestive of a single stock. However, future studies should evaluate how the stock is affected by differences in sex, age, and gene flow between the nearshore and offshore environments.
Article
Full-text available
A new genus and two new species of miniature clingfishes are described based on specimens collected from dense stands of macroalgae in intertidal and shallow subtidal areas along the coast of southern Australia. The new genus, Barryichthys, is distinguished from other genera of the Gobiesocidae by unique features of the adhesive disc, including elongate papillae in adhesive disc regions A and B, the reduction and/or loss of several elements of the cephalic lateral line canals, the lower gill arch skeleton, and the neurocranium, and by having two distinct types of pectoral-fin rays. Barryichthys hutchinsi is described based on 19 specimens (12.4-18.7 mm SL) from Western Australia and South Australia. Barryichthys algicola is described based on 22 specimens (9.0-21.0 mm SL) from Victoria, New South Wales and Tasmania. The new species are distinguished from each other by characters of body and head shape, vertebral counts, and aspects of live colour pattern. The new genus shares several characters in common with Parvicrepis, another genus of miniature gobiesocids from southern Australia that also inhabits macroalgae habitats. The many reductions and novel characters of Barryichthys are discussed within the context of miniaturisation.
Article
Full-text available
Teleost fishes are the most diverse group of vertebrates on Earth. On tropical coral reefs, their species richness exceeds 6000 species; one tenth of total vertebrate biodiversity. A large proportion of this diversity is composed of cryptobenthic reef fishes (CRFs): bottom‐dwelling, morphologically or behaviourally cryptic species typically less than 50 mm in length. Yet, despite their diversity and abundance, these fishes are both poorly defined and understood. Herein we provide a new quantitative definition and synthesise current knowledge on the diversity, distribution and life history of CRFs. First, we use size distributions within families to define 17 core CRF families as characterised by the high prevalence (>10%) of small‐bodied species (<50 mm). This stands in strong contrast to 42 families of large reef fishes, in which virtually no small‐bodied species have evolved. We posit that small body size has allowed CRFs to diversify at extremely high rates, primarily by allowing for fine partitioning of microhabitats and facilitation of allopatric reproductive isolation; yet, we are far from understanding and documenting the biodiversity of CRFs. Using rates of description since 1758, we predict that approximately 30 new species of cryptobenthic species will be described per year until 2050 (approximately twice the annual rate compared to large fishes). Furthermore, we predict that by the year 2031, more than half of the described coral reef fish biodiversity will consist of CRFs. These fishes are the ‘hidden half’ of vertebrate biodiversity on coral reefs. Notably, global geographic coverage and spatial resolution of quantitative data on CRF communities is uniformly poor, which further emphasises the remarkable reservoir of biodiversity that is yet to be discovered. Although small body size may have enabled extensive diversification within CRF families, small size also comes with a suite of ecological challenges that affect fishes' capacities to feed, survive and reproduce; we identify a range of life‐history adaptations that have enabled CRFs to overcome these limitations. In turn, these adaptations bestow a unique socio‐ecological role on CRFs, which includes a key role in coral reef trophodynamics by cycling trophic energy provided by microscopic prey to larger consumers. Although small in body size, the ecology and evolutionary history of CRFs may make them a critical component of coral‐reef food webs; yet our review also shows that these fishes are highly susceptible to a variety of anthropogenic disturbances. Understanding the consequences of these changes for CRFs and coral reef ecosystems will require us to shed more light on this frequently overlooked but highly diverse and abundant guild of coral reef fishes.
Article
Round goby Neogobius melanostomus (Pallas 1814) has become a significant component in the diet of piscivorous fish from the Pomeranian Bay (Bornholm Basin, Baltic Sea). Proper identification of fish species in the diet of predators is significant in biological studies of fish and other aquatic animal species, and, with regard to N. melanostomus, it is important to the knowledge of trophic web structures in areas this species has invaded. A total of 142 individuals of N. melanostomus measuring16–174 mm standard length, were examined. Seventy‐two fishes were caught during monitoring surveys in fishing grounds, while 70 were found in the stomachs of European perch Perca fluviatilis, pike‐perch Sander lucioperca and Baltic cod Gadus morhua. The objective of the present study was to analyse the sagittal otoliths to identify variations in outer shape with increases in fish length, to expand and correct descriptions of the sagitta, lapillus, and asteriscus otoliths, and to evaluate the relationships among otolith dimensions and fish standard length. The otoliths were described morphologically. The analysis of the outer shape of sagittal otoliths using Fourier analysis and multivariate statistics, exhibited great phenotypic variability that was associated with fish length, including within pairs in individuals and/or among individuals in length classes. Additionally, the asterisci and lapilli of N. melanostomus from selected specimens, which were described for the first time with regard to fish length, were found to be less variable compared to sagittal otoliths. This study presents the first analysis of intrapopulation phenotypic plasticity of N. melanostomus sagittal otolith morphology as it is linked to fish size.
Article
The active geology and ecological diversity in the Persian Gulf drainages create a rich source of biodiversity for the tooth‐carp fishes from which evolutionary processes can be studied. Here, we explored morphological differentiation in tooth‐carp Aphaniops hormuzensis from three ecologically diverse habitats (Khurgu sulphuric spring, Shur high‐salinity river and the urban canal) in the Hormuz riverine system, southern Iran. The evidence of sexual dimorphism was found in fish and otolith traits mainly in the Khurgu spring. The extreme conditions of the Khurgu spring could lead to the microhabitat segregation by fish individuals with different ages and spatial sexual segregation, and caused high intrapopulation differentiation in this site. However, the most diverged population belonged to the urban canal, which had more elongated pre‐ and post‐dorsal lengths, as well as a deep otolith. In sum, the observed phenotypic variations in A. hormuzensis are mainly influenced by sex‐dependent factors such as sexual dimorphism and the specific ecological condition of the Khurgu sulphuric spring (extreme sulphur‐rich habitat) and the urban canal (high food availability and hybridization event). This study provides the basic opportunity to explore the relative roles of ecological divergence and habitat differences in the morphological differentiation of A. hormuzensis.
Article
The taxonomic information inscribed in otoliths has been widely ignored in ichthyological research, especially in descriptions of new fish species. One reason for this is that otolith descriptions are per se qualitative, and only a few studies have presented quantitative data that can support assignments of otoliths to individual species or permit differentiation between higher taxonomic levels. On the other hand, in palaeontology, otoliths have been employed for the identification and taxonomic placement of fossil fish species for over 100 years. However, palaeontological otolith data is generally regarded with suspicion by ichthyologists. This is unfortunate because, in the Cenozoic, the fossil otolith record is much richer than that based on skeletons. Thus fossil otoliths are a unique source of information to advance our understanding of the origin, biogeographical history and diversification of the Teleostei. This case study deals with otoliths of the Oxudercidae, which, together with the Gobiidae, encompasses the 5-branchiostegal-rayed gobiiforms. The objective was to determine whether the five lineages of the Oxudercidae, and individual species of the European Pomatoschistus lineage, could be distinguished based on the quantification of otolith variations. The data set comprises otoliths from a total of 84 specimens belonging to 20 recent species, which represent all five lineages of the Oxudercidae (Mugilogobius, Acanthogobius, Pomatoschistus, Stenogobius, Periophthalmus), and five fossil otoliths of †Pomatoschistus sp. (sensu brzobo-hatý, 1994). Ten measurements were taken on each otolith and 23 otolith variables were computed and used for univariate and multivariate analyses. The results indicate that otolith morphometry (i) is capable of identifying the Pomatoschistus and Periophthalmus lineages among the Oxudercidae, but is of limited use in the separation of the other three lineages; (ii) can reliably distinguish the sand gobies (a distinct clade within the Pomatoschis-tus lineage) from other members of the Pomatoschistus lineage; and (iii) supports a previous assignment of fossil otoliths to †Pomatoschistus sp. as an ancient genus of the sand gobies. With its middle miocene age (15 m.y. ago), †Pomatoschistus sp. represents the oldest record of a sand goby species to date. We discuss possible relationships between distinct otolith morphologies, biogeographic distribution and lifestyles for Pomatoschistus and the Periophthalmus lineage, and also for the sand gobies. We conclude that otolith morphology, combined with morphometry, can be considered as an autapomorphy for an individual species from the studied groups. in addition, it also appears to contain a phylogenetic signal, but more work is needed to evaluate this fully. Résumé.-Que révèle la morphologie des otolithes de gobies ? l'information taxonomique inscrite dans les otolithes a longtemps été ignorée dans les recherches en ichtyo-logie, surtout dans la description de nouvelles espèces de poissons. Une des raisons est que la description des otolithes est souvent qualitative, et il n'existe que peu d'études qui ont présenté des données quantitatives per-mettant d'assigner un otolithe à une espèce, ou une discrimination à des niveaux taxonomiques plus élevés. À l'inverse, en paléontologie, les otolithes sont utilisés depuis plus de 100 ans pour l'identification et le replacement taxonomique de poissons fossiles. Cependant, les données d'otolithes paléontologiques sont généralement vues de manière suspicieuse par les ichtyologues. C'est bien dommage car, pour le Cénozoïque, il existe beau-coup plus de d'otolithes fossiles que de squelettes. ainsi, les otolithes fossiles représentent une source unique d'information qui peut nous aider à comprendre l'origine, l'histoire biogéographique et la diversification des téléostéens. Cette étude porte sur les otolithes d'Oxudercidae, qui, avec les Gobiidae, englobent les gobiiformes à cinq rayons branchiostèges. L'objectif de ce travail est de déterminer si les cinq lignées d'Oxudercidae, et des espèces européennes de la lignée Pomatoschistus, peuvent être différenciées grâce à des variables quantitati-ves des otolithes. le jeu de données comprend des otolithes de 84 spécimens appartenant à 20 espèces récen-tes représentant les cinq lignées d'Oxudercidae (Mugilogobius, Acanthogobius, Pomatoschistus, Stenogobius, Periophthalmus), et cinq otolithes fossiles de †Pomatoschistus sp. (sensu brzobohaty, 1994). Dix mesures ont été prises sur chaque otolithe et 23 variables ont été mises au point pour des analyses statistiques uni-et mul-tivariées. Les résultats montrent que l'analyse morphométrique des otolithes permet (i) d'identifier les lignées de Pomatoschistus et Periophthalmus parmi les Oxudercidae, mais qu'elle est d'intérêt limité pour la discrimination des trois autres lignées ; (ii) de distinguer de manière sûre les "sand gobies" (gobies vivant sur fonds sableux) des autres membres de la lignée Pomatoschistus ; (iii) de valider l'assignation des otolithes fossiles de †Pomatoschistus à un genre ancien de "sand gobies". Datant du Miocène moyen (-15 Ma), †Pomatoschistus sp. © SFI Goby otolith morphology Gierl et al. 350 Cybium 2018, 42(4) représente l'enregistrement le plus ancien de "sand gobies" connu à ce jour. notre étude permet de discuter les relations possibles entre des morphologies distinctes d'otolithes, la distribution géographique des espèces ainsi que leur mode de vie pour les lignées de Pomatoschistus et Periophthalmus, ainsi qu'au sein des "sand gobies". nous concluons que la morphologie des otolithes, combinée à leur analyse morphométrique, peut constituer une autapomorphie spécifique au sein des groupes étudiés. De plus, il semblerait qu'il puisse y avoir un signal phylo-génétique, mais des études approfondies sont nécessaires afin de clarifier ce point.
Article
Percomorph fishes are relatively uncommon in the Sarmatian deposits of Dolje and Belgrade where they are primarily of small size, often representing juvenile specimens. Here, we describe otoliths in situ from “Scorpaena” minima Kramberger 1882 (Scorpaenidae), Symphodus woodwardi (Kramberger 1891) (Labridae), and from an indeterminate clingfish tentatively placed in Apletodon (Gobiesocidae). “Scorpaena” minima is based on juvenile specimens and does not exhibit a complete set of features for a robust diagnosis, although it certainly represents a nominally valid species. Symphodus woodwardi is redefined herein based on the holotype and an additional small and well-preserved specimen, and a comparative analysis including Neogene congeners from the Mediterranean and Paratethys is discussed. Apletodon? sp. represents the first documented fossil clingfish in the record, even if the preservation of the three specimens identified does not allow a detailed taxonomic definition to the species level. None of the species with otolith in situ described herein can be related to any of the known coeval isolated otolith-based species, although in the case of the scorpaenid, such correlation is hampered by the juvenile nature of the available specimens.