ArticlePDF Available

Mechanisms of Action And Effects of Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields (PEMF) in Medicine

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

Pulsed Electromagnetic Field (PEMF) therapy is a non-invasive and non-thermal treatment widely used nowadays to treat various types of disorders and traumas, both in humans and animals. Initially applied only for wound healing, today it finds many applications in medicine for the treatment of bone fractures, arthritis, inflammation, edema, and pain. Although their mechanisms of action are still being studied today, and mainly related to the calcium signaling pathway, they are effective in the adjuvant treatment of many human diseases in different medical specialties. This work aims to report the main evidence and research in the medical field with particular reference to the application of PEMF to some medical specialties as regenerative medicine (wound care), sports medicine, orthopedics, and physiotherapy. Finally, this work also wanted to deepen one of the most recent applications of PEMF in the field of complex diseases, i.e. in the adjuvant treatment of cancer. Pulsed electromagnetic field therapy may play an important role in medicine as a complementary treatment for various human diseases and, by deepening the studies in the future, it will be possible not only to understand the exact mechanisms of action but also to extend its application to other pathologies both in the medical and veterinary fields.
Content may be subject to copyright.
J Med Res Surg,
Volume 1 • Issue 6 • 33
Journal of
Medical Research and Surgery
Luigi C, et al., J Med Res Surg 2020, 1:6
Mechanisms of Acon And Eects of Pulsed Electromagnec Fields (PEMF) in Medicine
Crisano Luigi1, Pratellesi Tiziano2
1PresgeLab, Presge Company, Loro Ciuenna (AR), Italy
2BAC Srl, Incisa e Figline Valdarno (FI), Italy
ABSTRACT
Pulsed Electromagnec Field (PEMF) therapy is a non-invasive and non-thermal treatment widely used nowadays
to treat various types of disorders and traumas, both in humans and animals. Inially applied only for wound
healing, today it nds many applicaons in medicine for the treatment of bone fractures, arthris, inammaon,
edema, and pain. Although their mechanisms of acon are sll being studied today, and mainly related to the
calcium signaling pathway, they are eecve in the adjuvant treatment of many human diseases in dierent
medical speciales. This work aims to report the main evidence and research in the medical eld with parcular
reference to the applicaon of PEMF to some medical speciales as regenerave medicine (wound care), sports
medicine, orthopedics, and physiotherapy. Finally, this work also wanted to deepen one of the most recent
applicaons of PEMF in the eld of complex diseases, i.e. in the adjuvant treatment of cancer.
Pulsed electromagnec eld therapy may play an important role in medicine as a complementary treatment for
various human diseases and, by deepening the studies in the future, it will be possible not only to understand
the exact mechanisms of acon but also to extend its applicaon to other pathologies both in the medical and
veterinary elds.
Keywords:
EMF, Pulsed Electromagnec Fields (PEMF), Wound healing,
Regenerave medicine.
Abbreviaons:
CaM: Calmodulin; cNOS: Cytoplasmic Nitric Oxide Synthase;
NO: Nitric Oxide; PEMFs, Pulsed Electromagnec Fields; cGMP:
Cyclic Guanosine Monophosphate.
Introducon
Pulsed electromagnec eld (PEMF) therapy is a type of
electrotherapy that uses pulsed electromagnec elds to treat
an injured area of ssue [1]. The key to the mechanism of
acon of PEMF, and all its biological eects on cells and ssues,
lies precisely in the modulaon of the electromagnec pulse
in a pulsed, rather than the connuous manner, as in classic
magnetotherapy, from which it is completely dierent. PEMF is
not part of magnetotherapy technologies.
The device that delivers PEMFs consists of a micro-generator
and an antenna. The laer is the eector part of the device, i.e.
the acve part that emits PEMFs with a typical carrier frequency
of 27.12 MHz [2]. PEMF waveforms have been designed to
penetrate completely through all types of ssues, from the skin
to bone, and represent a non-invasive and non-thermal type
of treatment [3]. Therefore, since their mechanism of acon
resides exclusively in non-thermal eects, they can be used
in medicine as a complementary treatment of many types of
pathologies, included traumas or disorders related to sports
medicine and physiotherapy, and any type of acute inammaon
or injury characterized by a high inammatory component.
Generally, treatment mes range from 20 minutes to 8 hours
a day, depending on the nature of injury and characteriscs of
the device [4], but PEMFs can be kept acve even in cycles of
twenty-four hours unl the aenuaon and/or disappearance of
the cardinal signs and symptoms of inammaon [5], including
pain, the aenuaon of which starts from the delivery of the
rst impulse by the device.
PEMF has been applied and studied for over twenty years
as a non-invasive technology for the promoon and speed of
wound healing and is eecvely used as an adjuvant treatment
in various pathologies including bone fractures, arthris,
osteoarthris, acute inammaon, chronic inammaon,
edema, pain, chronic pains, wounds, and chronic wounds [1,6-
10]. In the last ten years, their mechanisms of acon have been
deepened and, although they are sll the subject of study
today, some biochemical and metabolic pathways have been
highlighted that are acvated as a result of their interacon with
living ssues and that explain the therapeuc eects detected
in vivo, as well as in vitro.
Mechanism of acon
The mechanisms of acon of PEMF can be divided into three
types, i.e. physical mechanisms, biophysical mechanisms, and
purely biological mechanisms. While the physical mechanism of
acon is relavely simple, well known, and related to Faraday’s
law of inducon, which states how “a me-varying (pulsang)
electromagnec eld induces an electric eld in a nearby
conductor” [1], the mechanisms of acon biophysical and
biological are indeed very complex.
With every single pulse, the target ssue is hit by an
Mini Review
Correspondence to: Luigi Crisano, PresgeLab Presge, Loro Ciuenna, Italy; Email: presge.infomed@gmail.com
Received date: November 18, 2020; Accepted date: December 03, 2020; Published date: December 10, 2020
Citaon: Luigi C, Tiziano P (2020) Mechanisms of Acon And Eects of Pulsed Electromagnec Fields (PEMF) in Medicine. J Med Res Surg 1(6): pp. 1-4.
Copyright: ©2020 Luigi C, et al. This is an open-access arcle distributed under the terms of the Creave Commons Aribuon License, which permits unrestricted
use, distribuon and reproducon in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Authors contribuon: The authors contributed equally to the wring of this work.
Page 1 of 4
J Med Res Surg,
Volume 1 • Issue 6 • 33
Citaon: Luigi C, Tiziano P (2020) Mechanisms of Acon And Eects of Pulsed Electromagnec Fields (PEMF) in Medicine. J Med Res Surg 1(6): pp. 1-4.
Page 2 of 4
electromagnec eld.
The main eect of this smulaon happens at the level
of the plasma membrane of the cells, which undergoes a
transient depolarizaon [7]. This event triggers very important
secondary eects (a biophysical mechanism) through the
transient opening of specic transmembrane ion channels,
among which the voltage-dependent channels for the Calcium
ion (Ca2+) stand out. Calcium is an important second cellular
messenger, in fact, the entry of calcium into the cell, and its
binding at the cytoplasmic level with Calmodulin (CaM), in a
me equal to milliseconds from a single pulse, triggers a whole
set of biochemical pathways to cascade in the cytoplasm. They
include various enzymac acvaons among which the release
of Nitric Oxide (NO), in a me equal to seconds from a single
pulse, through the acvaon of the cytoplasmic nitric oxide
synthase (cNOS) [1,3,7,11,12].
Nitric oxide, considered a soluble hormone, in turn, acvates
a whole set of biochemical pathways, one of which leads to
the producon of Cyclic Guanosine Monophosphate (cGMP),
another second messenger, in a me equal to seconds/
minutes from a single pulse. From this moment the terary
eects of PEMF begin, of a purely biological type, which
connue over a period ranging from a few hours to days and
weeks starng from the rst impulse and which include the
transcriponal acvaon of various genes into the cell nucleus
with the producon of growth factors and other proteins and
transmembrane receptors that will result in the orientaon
of the cells, regardless of the ssue they are part of, to
regeneraon and restore homeostasis [1,3,8,11-13] (Figure 1).
Figure 1: Mechanisms of acon of PEMF on the cell. The most accredited current model sees the biochemical pathways acvated by the calcium ion (Ca2+) and
subsequently by the nitric oxygen (NO) and cGMP as the key mechanisms of the acon of PEMFs at the cellular level and, as a consequence, on the responses of
ssues. (A) General graphical representaon of the model; (B) Schemac detail of the sequence of events starng from the rst PEMF pulse with the alignment
of the temporal ow diagram of the individual events and the involvement of the various cellular compartments [3,7,8,11].
What is observed macroscopically is the reducon of
inammaon, pain, edema, and complete ssue regeneraon,
including neovascularizaon and remodeling of the extracellular
matrix up to complete restoraon of the injured ssue [2,5]. All
the cells involved in an injury respond to the acon of PEMF,
including endothelial cells (which will rebuild the injured
blood vessels), broblasts (which will proliferate and repair
the injured extracellular matrix), muscle cells, chondrocytes,
and osteoblasts (which will undergo a more rapid and ecient
proliferaon) [12].
The acvity of the cells of the immune system, in parcular
the inammatory component, is instead sedated (lowering of
the levels of interleukins) [5] and the acvaon of monocytes
to macrophages is favored to clean the injured area from
microorganisms, foreign bodies, and dead cells. Ulmately,
of the possible outcomes of acute inammaon, i.e. necrosis,
chronic inammaon, and healing, PEMF blocks the rst two
and favors the regenerave outcomes of cells and ssues.
Applicaon elds
The PEMF, as previously menoned, promotes ssue healing
and nd applicaon in various elds of medicine to promote
healing following various kinds of traumas, injuries, post-surgical
wounds, and inammaons. Pathologies that nd the eecve
applicaon of this technology include bone fractures, arthris,
osteoarthris, acute and chronic inammaon, edema, pain,
chronic pain, wounds, and chronic wounds [3,7,10,12]. PEMFs
are also applied in physiotherapy, orthopedics, osteopathy,
rehabilitaon pracce, sports medicine, and tness, including
the neuromuscular recovery of the post-workout athlete. The
pathologies and disorders that may be included, in addion to
those already listed above, concern all injuries, traumas, and
inammaons aecng the shoulder, elbow, hand, knee, spine,
hip joint, ankle joint, and foot [4,11,12,14]. Also included may
be all pains of an arthric nature, pain at the level of tendon
inserons (e.g. tennis arm, golfer’s elbow, pitcher’s shoulder,
and scapulohumeral periarthris), overload syndrome,
J Med Res Surg,
Volume 1 • Issue 6 • 33
Page 3 of 4
Treatment of tendinis
PEMF can reduce pain and increase mobility right from the
rst applicaons even in paents who suer from the disorder
and do not respond or cannot take corcosteroid-based drug
therapy [7,10,12].
Adjuvant treatment of cancer
Very recent studies concern the possible applicaon of
PEMF as an adjuvant in the non-surgical treatment of tumor
pathologies, in parcular solid tumors [22,23]. Research and
evaluaons are underway both in vitro and in vivo on animal
models and in the clinic on case studies. The rst results
seem very encouraging as there is a decrease in the vitality
of cancer cells, a reducon/delay in tumor angiogenesis, and
a decrease in the growth rates of cancer cells. PEMF also
promotes apoptosis and/or necrosis of tumor cells [10,24-26].
The biochemical mechanisms underlying what is observed are
not yet clear but it is assumed that PEMF, while in a normal cell
induces it to homeostasis, in a tumor cell probably reacvates
metabolic and signaling pathways bypassed or silenced by
the neoplasc transformaon process such that the cell is so
directed towards apoptosis or necrosis.
In clinical applicaons, it has been seen that there are specic
frequencies (tumor-specic frequencies) that have eects
on cancer cells [27] while some frequencies do not aect
metastases or tumor cells but only on the healing of lesions,
in parcular in the post-surgical aer exeresis of a solid
tumor with beer and faster wound healing, the reducon of
recovery mes and eliminaon of infecons and post-surgical
scar formaon [28,29]. Despite the posive results of the rst
studies, the applicaon of PEMF in the oncology eld is sll
under study and requires further invesgaon.
Conclusions
PEMFs can penetrate completely through all types of ssues,
from the skin to bone, and are capable of inducing cellular and
ssue responses, including transcriponal acvaon. PEMFs
are cheap, very simple to use, non-invasive, non-thermal,
have no known side eects, and can play an important role
in the complementary treatment of various human diseases
or trauma, included bone fractures, arthris, osteoarthris,
acute inammaon, chronic inammaon, edema, pain,
chronic pains, wounds, and chronic wounds. Although the
mechanisms of acon of PEMFs have yet to be fully elucidated,
they nd interesng applicaons in medicine and various
medical speciales, including sports medicine, orthopedics,
and physiotherapy, and currently, it is under study their
applicaon, and their possible benets, in complex and
chronic-degenerave diseases, including cancer.
In conclusion, PEMFs may play an important role in medicine
as a complementary treatment for various human diseases
and further studies will clarify their mechanisms of acon and
extend their applicaon elds both in human and veterinary
pathology.
Acknowledgment
Thanks to Mr. Simone Pratellesi and Mr. Valerio Pratellesi for
all the technical assistance, informaon, and material provided,
including many scienc studies and preliminary data, which
patellar pathology, meniscal pathology, degeneraon of the
intervertebral discs and vertebral joints, “witch stroke”, cervical
spine pain due to “whiplash”, ischial pain, muscle contractures,
and post-traumac outcomes. All degenerave pains, painful
tendon inserons, bursis, Achilles tendon inammaon,
calcaneal spine, and at foot pain also may benet [10,12,15].
Recent studies also regard their applicaon as an adjuvant
treatment for complex diseases such as cardiovascular
diseases, diabetes, neurological disorders, microbial infecons,
and tumors [1,10,11]. PEMFs have no known side eects [3].
Wound healing
PEMF has its main and historical applicaon in the treatment of
wounds. Wound healing is a complex process involving cascades
of inammatory, proliferave, immune, and ssue remodeling
reacons [16]. Clinical studies have shown that treatment with
PEMF can promote and accelerate the healing of both fresh
and recent wounds, including post-operave wounds, as well
as chronic wounds such as pressure sores and diabec leg and
foot ulcers. The mechanism underlying this ability appears to
be partly due to the increased vascularizaon induced in the
ssue by smulaon via PEMF, but also to the beer perfusion
of the injured ssue and the beer oxygenaon, all important
factors for wound repair [1,11,16,17].
PEMF smulates endothelial cells to reproduce and rebuild
injured blood vessels, increasing angiogenesis over me in the
ssues aected by the wound [1,18]. PEMF also smulates
broblasts to rebuild the injured extracellular matrix, smulates
epithelial cells to reproduce, and restore lost ssue connuity.
A key and very interesng aspect are that smulaon using
PEMF synchronizes the reproducon acvity of the cells
invested by the electromagnec eld in a way that no cell
species can privilege the others. This parcular mechanism
is sll under study but the eects are visible as the healing
of fresh wounds occurs when treated with PEMF, mainly
by the rst intenon, or similar to the rst intenon, rather
than by the second intenon. This means that there is less
development of keloids and disguring scars [3]. Also, PEMFs
reduce inammaon and pain from the rst impulse. This is
signicant in the management of all wounds but especially
post-operave wounds [1].
Bone repair
Bone repair requires the cooperaon of specic bone cell
types: osteoblasts and osteoclasts. PEMFs have been shown to
aect bone repair through several mechanisms including the
smulaon of brocarlage calcicaon in the space between
bone segments, the increased blood ow and wound healing as
a result of eects on calcium ion channels, and increased bone
formaon rate by osteoblasts (1,4,7,10,19,20]. On the contrary,
it is found that osteoclasc acvity is reduced. Furthermore,
the use of PEMF as a treatment for unconsolidated fractures
has proven to be very eecve [4].
Treatment of osteoarthris, arthris, and osteoarthris
PEMF smulaon has been shown to have clinical ecacy for
the treatment of arthrosis and arthris, including osteoarthris
and rheumatoid arthris [1,7,9,10,12,21]. PEMF suppresses
the inammatory response [5] and is an adjunct in the
management and treatment of pain.
Citaon: Luigi C, Tiziano P (2020) Mechanisms of Acon And Eects of Pulsed Electromagnec Fields (PEMF) in Medicine. J Med Res Surg 1(6): pp. 1-4.
J Med Res Surg,
Volume 1 • Issue 6 • 33
Page 4 of 4
14. Zidan N, Fenn J, Grith E, Early PJ, Mariani CL et al. (2018)
The Eect of Electromagnec Fields on Post- Operave
Pain and Locomotor Recovery in Dogs with Acute, Severe
Thoracolumbar Intervertebral Disc Extrusion: A Randomized
Placebo-Controlled, Prospecve Clinical Trial. J Neurotrauma
35(15): pp. 1726-1736.
15. Markoll R, Da Silva Ferreira DM, Toohil TK (2003) Pulsed
Signal Therapy®: An overview. APLAR J Rheum 6(1): pp. 89-100.
16. Saliev T, Mustapova Z, Kulsharova G (2014) Therapeuc
potenal of electromagnec elds for ssue engineering and
wound healing. Cell Prolif 47(6): pp. 485-493.
17. Rawe I (2012) Pulsed radio-frequency electromagnec eld
(PEMF) therapy as an adjunct wound healing therapy. Wounds
Int 3(4): pp. 32-34.
18. Paño O, Grana D, Bolgiani A, et al. (1996) Pulsed
Electromagnec Fields in Experimental Cutaneous Wound
Healing in Rats. J Burn Care Rehabil 17(6): pp. 528–531.
19. Zhai M, Jing D, Tong S, et al. (2016) Pulsed electromagnec
elds promote in vitro osteoblastogenesis through a Wnt/beta-
catenin signaling-associated mechanism. Bioelectromagnecs
37: pp. 152-162.
20. Teven CM, Greives M, Natale RB, et al. (2012) Dierenaon
of Osteoprogenitor Cells Is Induced by High-Frequency Pulsed
Electromagnec Fields. J Craniofac Surg 23(2): pp. 586-593.
21. Wang T, Xie W, Ye W, et al. (2019) Eects of electromagnec
elds on osteoarthris. Biomed Pharmacother 118: 109282.
22. Sengupta S, Balla VK (2018) A review on the use of magnec
elds and ultrasound for non-invasive cancer treatment. J Adv
Res 14: pp. 97-111.
23. Berg H, Gunther B, Hilger I, et al. (2010) Bioelectromagnec
Field Eects on Cancer Cells and Mice Tumors. Electromagn
Biol Med 29(4): pp.132-143.
24. Traitcheva N, Angelova P, Radeva M, et al. (2003) ELF Fields
and Photooxidaon Yielding Lethal Eects on Cancer Cells.
Bioelectromagnecs 24(1): pp.148-150.
25. Hisamitsu T, Narita K, Kasahara T, et al. (1997) Inducon of
Apoptosis in Human Leukemic Cells by Magnec Fields. Jpn J
Physiol 47(3): pp. 307-310.
26. Cadossi R (1990) In Vitro and in Vivo Eects of
Electromagnec Fields: Their Possible Role in the Development
of New Strategies for Cancer Treatment. J Bioelectricity 9(2):
pp. 197-203.
27. Barbault A, Costa FP, Boger B, et al. (2009) Amplitude-
modulated electromagnec elds for the treatment of cancer:
discovery of tumor-specic frequencies and assessment of a
novel therapeuc approach. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 28(1): 51-52.
28. Vadalà M, Morales-Medina JC, Vallelunga A, et al.
(2016) Mechanisms and therapeuc eecveness of pulsed
electromagnec eld therapy in oncology. Cancer Med 5(11):
pp. 3128-3139.
29. Leman ES, Sisken BF, Zimmer S, et al. (2001) Studies of the
interacons between melatonin and 2 Hz, 0.3 mT PEMF on
the proliferaon and invasion of human breast cancer cells.
Bioelectromagnecs 22(3): pp. 178-184.
have been used as a reference and idea to deepen and expand
the background of this review.
Funding
This research did not receive any specic grant from any
funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-prot
sector.
References
1. Gaynor JS, Hagberg S, Gurfein BT (2018) Veterinary
applicaons of pulsed electromagnec eld therapy. Res Vet
Sci 119(8): pp.1-8.
2. Markov M, Nindl G, Hazelwood C, et al. (2006) Interacons
between electromagnec elds and immune system: possible
mechanism for pain control. In: Ayrapetyan SN, Markov MS,
editors. Bioelectromagnecs Current Concepts. Dordrecht:
Springer pp. 213–225.
3. Strauch B, Herman C, Dabb R (2009) Evidence-Based Use of
Pulsed Electromagnec Field Therapy. Aesthet Surg J 29(2): pp.
135–143.
4. Basse CAL (1993). Benecial Eects of Electromagnec
Fields. J Cell Biochem 51(4): pp. 387-393.
5. Zou J, Chen Y, Qian J, et al. (2017) Eect of a low-frequency
pulsed electromagnec eld on expression and secreon of IL-
and TNF-α in nucleus pulposus cells. J Int Med Res 45(2):
pp. 462-470.
6. Bianchi N, Sacche F, Mordà M, et al. (2018) Use Of Pulsed
Radiofrequency Electromagnec Field (PRFE) Therapy For Pain
Management And Wound Healing In Total Knee And Reverse
Shoulder Prosthesis: Randomized And Double-blind Study.
Euromediterr Biomed J 13(28): pp. 120-112.
7. Funk RH (2018) Coupling of pulsed electromagnec elds
(PEMF) therapy to molecular grounds of the cell. Am J Transl
Res 10(5): pp. 1260-1272.
8. Kubat NJ, Moet J, Fray LM (2015) Eect of pulsed
electromagnec eld treatment on programmed resoluon
of inammaon pathway markers in human cells in culture. J
Inamm Res 8(1): pp. 59–69.
9. Selvam R, Ganesan K, Narayana Raju KV, et al. (2007) Low
frequency and low intensity pulsed electromagnec eld
exerts its aninammatory eect through restoraon of
plasma membrane calcium ATPase acvity. Life Sci 80(26): pp.
2403-2410.
10. Shupak NM, Prato FS, Thomas AW (2003) Therapeuc uses
of pulsed magnec-eld exposure: A review. In: URSI Radio
Science Bullen 307: pp. 9-32.
11. Ma KC, Baumhauer JF (2013) Pulsed electromagnec eld
treatment in wound healing. Curr Orthop Pract 24(5): pp. 487-
492.
12. Wade B (2013) A review of pulsed electromagnec eld
(PEMF) mechanisms at a cellular level: a raonale for clinical
use. Am J Health Res 1(3): pp. 51-55.
13. Luben RA (1991) Eects of low-energy electromagnec
elds (pulsed and dc) on membrane signal transducon
processes in biological systems. Health Phys 61(1): pp.15-28.
Citaon: Luigi C, Tiziano P (2020) Mechanisms of Acon And Eects of Pulsed Electromagnec Fields (PEMF) in Medicine. J Med Res Surg 1(6): pp. 1-4.
... The first is induction of transient depolarization of the plasma membrane, leading to influx of Ca 2+ via voltage-dependent Ca 2+ ion channels. The second is the production of Nitric Oxide (NO), triggered by the binding of calcium to calmodulin [21] These both occur within seconds of application of the PEMF. ...
... This occurs within hours to days and likely accounts for longer-term healing processes. Gene transcription is initiated indirectly through the Ca 2+ induced NO pathway described above, as well as through direct activation of numerous cell-signaling pathways [21]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy (BPH) is the most common benign urological condition in males. It is a progressive condition associated with aging, affecting over 80% by age 80 and can affect quality of life. While the exact cause is not fully known, hormones, metabolic alterations, inflammation and vascular flow may be contributing causes of BPH. Medical or surgical treatments are the standard of care for addressing associated Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LTUS) and erectile dysfunction associated with BPH, but each has risks and is not always effective. Pulsed Electromagnetic Field (PEMF) therapy is a noninvasive modality that has been shown to address some of the potential underlying contributing factors of BPH, including inflammation and microvascularity. Ultrasound has been shown to be an effective modality to evaluate inflammatory and microvascular changes in the prostate in addition to size. Here we present three case studies of males with known BPH and varying degrees of LTUS treated with PEMF for 30 days, utilizing ultrasound to evaluate response. Prostate size decreased in all participants, with average decrease of 27.3% and no adverse effects. Introduction Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy (BPH) is defined as the enlargement of the prostate gland due to abnormal proliferation of stromal and epithelial cells that results in increased volume of the prostate transition zone [1]. It is a common condition of aging, estimated to affect 60% by age 60 and over 80% by age 80 [2]. Rates of BPH have been increasing over the past 30 years, affecting an estimated 79 million males over the age of 60 worldwide, especially those in China, India and the United States [3].
... The first is induction of transient depolarization of the plasma membrane, leading to influx of Ca 2+ via voltage-dependent Ca 2+ ion channels. The second is the production of Nitric Oxide (NO), triggered by the binding of calcium to calmodulin [21] These both occur within seconds of application of the PEMF. ...
... This occurs within hours to days and likely accounts for longer-term healing processes. Gene transcription is initiated indirectly through the Ca 2+ induced NO pathway described above, as well as through direct activation of numerous cell-signaling pathways [21]. [20,23]. ...
Article
Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy (BPH) is the most common benign urological condition in males. It is a progressive condition associated with aging, affecting over 80% by age 80 and can affect quality of life. While the exact cause is not fully known, hormones, metabolic alterations, inflammation and vascular flow may be contributing causes of BPH. Medical or surgical treatments are the standard of care for addressing associated Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LTUS) and erectile dysfunction associated with BPH, but each has risks and is not always effective. Pulsed Electromagnetic Field (PEMF) therapy is a noninvasive modality that has been shown to address some of the potential underlying contributing factors of BPH, including inflammation and microvascularity. Ultrasound has been shown to be an effective modality to evaluate inflammatory and microvascular changes in the prostate in addition to size. Here we present three case studies of males with known BPH and varying degrees of LTUS treated with PEMF for 30 days, utilizing ultrasound to evaluate response. Prostate size decreased in all participants, with average decrease of 27.3% and no adverse effects.
... PEMF therapy is thought to facilitate calcium ion migration into cells, enhance calcium ion binding to calmodulin (a protein that aids nitric oxide release and growth factor secretion), and modulate immune cell function by lowering interleukin levels and suppressing the catabolic effects of interleukin-1β-induced pro-inflammatory signals, which promote tendinopathy by activating matrix metalloproteinases and leading to extracellular matrix degradation. Additionally, PEMF therapy supports the conversion of monocytes to macrophages, helping remove microorganisms, foreign substances, and dead cells from the affected area [31][32][33]. Moreover, PEMF exposure has been demonstrated to upregulate collagen type I expression and elevate the levels of interleukin-10 and vascular endothelial growth factor, both of which play key roles in promoting tendon healing [16][17][18]. ...
Article
Full-text available
We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy of pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) therapy in treating patients with shoulder impingement syndrome. We sourced data from PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Embase databases up until June 19, 2024. Our analysis included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the impact of PEMF therapy on pain levels and functional capacity in these patients. In total, four RCTs involving 252 participants were included. The pooled data indicated that PEMF therapy significantly reduced short-term pain (standardized mean difference [SMD] = -0.34, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -0.66 to -0.01, three RCTs, n = 166) and improved both short-term (SMD = 0.4, 95% CI = 0.08 to 0.73, three RCTs, n = 166) and long-term functional capacity (SMD = 0.6, 95% CI = 0.33 to 0.88, three RCTs, n = 212). The aforementioned results all achieved clinical significance. The observed low heterogeneity for short-term pain, along with short term and long-term functional capacity, highlights the sustained robustness and consistency of the effect on functional capacity over time. These results suggest that PEMF therapy is statistically effective in enhancing short-term pain relief and improving both short-term and long-term functional capacity in patients with shoulder impingement syndrome, with clinically significant benefits. However, the study limitations include a small sample size and variability in PEMF protocols, highlighting the necessity for standardized methodologies in future research.
... A capacitor that follows blocks the DC components and generates a carrier wave with a frequency of 27.12 MHz. This frequency falls into the Industrial, Scientific, and Medical (ISM) channel, which is also allocated by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for therapeutic devices 12,19,54 . The RER structure consists of an electromagnetic radiator with a pair of ring electrodes, enclosed in a thin encapsulation layer made of PI as a protective barrier to prevent direct contact between the metal electrodes and the wound. ...
Article
Full-text available
Pulsed radio frequency energy (PRFE) therapy is a non-invasive, electromagnetic field-based treatment modality successfully used in clinical applications. However, conventional PRFE devices are often bulky, expensive, and require extended treatment durations, limiting patient adherence and efficacy. Here, we present a lightweight, cost-effective wearable PRFE system consisting of a flexible electronic bandage and a smartphone. The bandage, mainly composed of an NFC Frequency Doubler (NFD) and a Radiofrequency Energy Radiator (RER), is powered and administered by the smartphone to generate 27.12 MHz radio wave pulses, for simplified, smartphone-enabled PRFE therapy. Its ultra-flexible, battery-free design supports personalized wound care at a low-cost (<US$1). Both electromagnetic field simulation and measurement demonstrated that the proposed PRFE bandage achieves the field strength of clinical-grade PRFE equipment. In rat full-thickness wound models, PRFE therapy improved wound closure rates by ~20%, with enhanced re-epithelialization and angiogenesis compared to controls.
... Pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMFs) are widely used in equine training and rehabilitation [19][20][21], despite the scarcity of literature data concerning their effects in horses. Bio-Electro-Magnetic-Energy-Regulation (BEMER) is a PEMF therapy with marked effects on microcirculation and autorhythmically controlled vasomotion [22][23][24], while the underlying mechanisms are not yet fully explored. The system creates a 10-100 µT pulsed electromagnetic field with half-wave-shaped sinusoidal intensity variations, which stimulates the body's regulatory mechanisms for organ blood flow, especially in cases of limited regulatory ranges or dysfunctional perfusions such as those encountered during general anesthesia in the horse [3,4]. ...
Article
Full-text available
The use of Bio-Electro-Magnetic-Energy-Regulation (BEMER) therapy during general anesthesia has not previously been reported in horses. This randomized, investigator-blinded, placebo-controlled trial evaluates equine cardiopulmonary function and recovery quality after BEMER therapy application for 15 min in 100 horses during general anesthesia using isoflurane for pars-plana vitrectomy surgery as treatment for recurrent uveitis. Visually identical blankets were used in the two groups (1:1 ratio), one with a functional BEMER module and the other with a placebo module. Arterial blood pressure, blood gas, lactate, and creatine kinase (CK) values were measured at different timepoints, and each timepoint was compared between the groups using paired t-tests. The quality of recovery from anesthesia was assessed by one blinded veterinary surgeon using a 10-category scoring system with scores ranging from 10 (best) to 72 (worst) and compared by an ordinary least squares regression analysis. The placebo group had a significantly better recovery (mean 16.1, standard deviation 7.15) than the BEMER-therapy group (mean 22.4, SD 13.0). Arterial blood pressure and blood lactate were lower in the BEMER-therapy group without reaching statistical significance, while CK and blood gas values were comparable. BEMER-horse therapy showed an effect on the recovery quality of horses undergoing general anesthesia.
... Physical therapies, such as pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMF) and low-intensity ultrasound (LIPUS), have gained attention for their regenerative potential. These non-invasive approaches stimulate the biological processes involved in tissue repair and regeneration [4]. PEMF therapy exerts profound effects on cellular responses, modulating cell membrane permeability, ion transport, and membrane potential to regulate cellular activity and promote tissue repair [5][6][7][8]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Peripheral nerve regeneration remains a major challenge in neuroscience, despite advancements in understanding its mechanisms. Current treatments, including nerve transplantation and drug therapies, face limitations such as invasiveness and incomplete recovery of nerve function. Physical therapies, like pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMF) and low-intensity ultrasound (LIPUS), are gaining attention for their potential to enhance regeneration. This study analyzes the effects of PEMF and LIPUS on gene expression in human primary Schwann cells, which are crucial for nerve myelination and repair. Key genes involved in neurotrophin signaling (NGF, BDNF), inflammation (IL-1β, IL-6, IL-10, TNF-α, TGF-β), and regeneration (CRYAB, CSPG, Ki67) were assessed. The results of this study reveal that combined PEMF and LIPUS therapies promote Schwann cell proliferation, reduce inflammation, and improve the regenerative environment, offering potential for optimizing these therapies for clinical use in regenerative medicine.
... PEMF therapy has become a potential treatment for several illnesses, including hypertension. The examined studies consistently provide compelling evidence regarding the effectiveness of PEMF therapy in regulating BP [38]. Research by Stewart et al. [8] and Kim et al. [31] emphasizes PEMF therapy's ability to enhance endothelial function and increase NO levels. ...
Article
Full-text available
Hypertension is a major preventable risk factor for cardiovascular disease. This review evaluates the effects of pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) therapy and aerobic exercise on blood pressure (BP) levels in hypertensive patients. This study incorporated research conducted between 2012 and 2020 that was found through a systematic literature search. The measures used to estimate the improvement in BP include the BP measurements, quality-of-life (QOL) scale, and plasma nitric oxide (NO) level. The examination of the review comprised eight studies. These encompassed studies involving individuals with a systolic BP (SBP) above 140 mmHg and a diastolic BP (DBP) above 90 mmHg; those falling within the age range of 40 to 60 years, including both genders; and patients on antihypertensive medications. The review of selected articles concluded that PEMF therapy and aerobic exercise positively impact BP among individuals with hypertension. Aerobic exercises of moderate intensity including brisk walking, jogging, and cycling type of aerobic exercises help reduce BP and maintain patients' physical fitness. PEMF therapy is a complementary approach that affects the biological system and potential health, positively impacting BP. Results indicate that PEMF therapy can be a nonpharmacological method to manage BP in clinical populations. More thorough research is necessary to understand the best dosage, long-term effects, and comparison between PEMF therapy and aerobic exercise.
... When the electromagnetic wave is transmitted in a pulsed way, the mode is defined as pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMF), and represents a subset of the extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields, with a pulsed repetition frequency (PRF) from 5 to 300 Hz [10] . This stimulation regime was demonstrated to have beneficial effects for wound healing, pain treatment, bone formation, and other applications [11][12][13] , so that in 1979 the United States Food and Drug Administration started approving several PEMF devices for the treatment of delayed union or non-union fractures [10] . Nonetheless, until today, the widespread adoption of PEMF in mainstream medicine remains limited and is generally restricted to use by prescription as the underlying biological mechanisms have not been fully understood yet [14] . ...
Article
Full-text available
Nerve regeneration following traumas remains an unmet challenge. The application of pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) stimulation has gained traction for a minimally invasive regeneration of nerves. However, a systematic exploration of different PEMF parameters influencing neuron function at a cellular level is not available. In this study, we exposed neuroblastoma F11 cells to PEMF to trigger beneficial effects on neurite outgrowth. Different carrier frequencies, pulse repetition frequencies, and duty cycles were screened with a custom ad hoc setup to find the most influential parameters values. A carrier frequency of 13.5 MHz, a pulse repetition frequency of 20 Hz, and a duty cycle of 10% allowed maximal neurite outgrowth, with unaltered viability with respect to non-stimulated controls. Furthermore, in a longer-term analysis, such optimal conditions were also able to increase the gene expression of neuronal expression markers NeuN and Tuj-1 and transcription factor Ngn1. Finally, the same optimal stimulation conditions were also applied to THP-1 macrophages, and both pro-inflammatory (TNF-𝛼, IL-1𝛽, IL-6, IL-8) and anti-inflammatory cytokines (IL-10, CD206) were analyzed. The optimal PEMF stimulation parameters did not induce differentiation towards an M1 macrophage phenotype, decreased IL-1𝛽 and IL-8 gene expression, decreased TNF- 𝛼and IL-8 cytokine release in M1-differentiated cells, increased IL-10 and CD206 gene expression, as well as IL-10 cytokine release in M0 cells. The specific PEMF stimulation regime, which is optimal in vitro, might have a high potential for a future in vivo translation targeting neural regeneration and anti-inflammatory action for treating peripheral nerve injuries.
Presentation
2025Pdm3 March 29 - Abstract 101: Background: The success of rehabilitation is influenced by a number of factors. This study seeks to determine the extent to which patients and healthcare professionals can accurately assess health status and rehabilitation outcomes based on patient records, and to identify the factors that impact these evaluations. Patients and Methods: The study cohort comprised 23 patient-researchers and 24 healthcare professionals, of whom 78.7% were female. Both groups evaluated the health status of anonymised rehabilitation patients at admission and discharge, as well as rehabilitation outcomes, utilising a five-point rating scale based on patient documentation. Each participant analysed records from six individual cases from the historical cohort. The self-assessments of rehabilitation outcomes were compared with objective classifications (poor, moderate, good) using standardised outcome assessments (PROMs and CROMs). The potential moderating critical factors influencing rehabilitation outcomes were examined through both open-ended and structured questions. Furthermore, the influence of evaluators' epistemic trust on external assessments was analysed in greater detail. Additionally, patients provided self-assessments of their personal rehabilitation progress during a three-week inpatient orthopaedic rehabilitation programme. Results: The most crucial factors for successful rehabilitation, as identified by all participants, were physical activity and general health status. However, patient-researchers placed significantly greater emphasis on psychosocial elements, including optimism, self-efficacy, self-care, mindfulness, social relationships, and medication (p < .05) compared to healthcare professionals. In terms of their own rehabilitation success, patients identified activities, participation and environmental factors as key elements, emphasising the importance of active engagement in therapy and effective communication with healthcare professionals. Additionally, notable discrepancies were identified in the evaluations of rehabilitation progress made by patients and healthcare professionals. Healthcare professionals assigned significantly more favourable ratings to patients' health status at admission (p < .001, η²ₚ = 0.069) and displayed greater confidence in their assessments of rehabilitation success (p < .001, η²ₚ = 0.049). The external evaluations of rehabilitation success by healthcare professionals were more closely aligned with objective classifications, showing a 54.5% agreement (κ = 0.30, p < .001), compared to a 47.7% agreement by patient-researchers (κ = 0.18, p < .001). Higher levels of epistemic trust were associated with more positive assessments of rehabilitation outcomes (B = -0.45, p = .042), with a greater degree of this relationship observed among healthcare professionals (27.63 ± 0.80 vs. 25.61 ± 3.76; p = .031). However, no clear relationship was established between epistemic trust and the accuracy of outcome assessments. Conclusion: Patients and healthcare professionals both identify physical activity and general health status as key factors for rehabilitation success, establishing a shared foundation for evaluation. However, patients emphasize a more personalized approach to their own rehabilitation, focusing on active involvement and supportive interactions, while considering broader psychosocial factors when assessing others. Healthcare professionals demonstrate more valid assessments, closely aligned with objective measures, supported by higher levels of epistemic trust. Although trust is linked to more positive evaluations, its relationship with assessment accuracy remains complex. While subjective insights offer valuable perspectives on individual needs, consistent use of objective outcome measures is crucial for evidence-based practice. The creation of a trusting environment and the identification of critical success factors through collaboration can enhance rehabilitation outcomes. Key words: Critical Success Factors; Epistemic Trust; Orthopaedic Rehabilitation Matko, Š., et al., Which factors influence the success of rehabilitation? - A mixed-methods study on patients and healthcare professionals. Eur J Transl Myol, 2025. 35(1): p. 96-97. DOI: 10.4081/ejtm.2025.13789
Article
Background: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a debilitating neurodegenerative condition characterized by various symptoms, particularly fatigue, which can significantly impact mental health and quality of life. Evidence regarding the efficacy of pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) therapy in managing certain symptoms of MS remains controversial. Objectives: This systematic review aimed to evaluate randomized clinical trials (RCTs) assessing the effects of PEMF therapy on fatigue, depression, and quality of life in individuals with MS. Methods: The electronic databases PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched for articles published between 1990 and 2023 using the keywords magnetic field therapy and MS. Two independent reviewers conducted the processes of screening, data extraction, and quality assessment. Fatigue was analyzed as the primary outcome, while depression and quality of life were considered secondary outcomes. Results: The search yielded 1,768 articles, of which 8 met the inclusion criteria for this review. A total of 372 participants were analyzed, 267 (71.7%) of whom were women. The intervention duration ranged from 3 to 12 weeks. Fatigue levels were reported in all included studies, while depression and quality of life were assessed in three studies. Conclusions: Compared to placebo, beneficial effects of PEMF therapy on fatigue severity were observed in only two studies, while the remaining studies showed no significant differences between groups. Furthermore, quality of life improved in only one study, and depression scores were comparable between groups at the end of all three studies. Additional trials with longer intervention durations, larger sample sizes, advanced technological devices, and objective assessment tools are needed to resolve this controversy.
Article
Full-text available
Pulsed radiofrequency Electromagnetic field (PRFE) has a long history about treatment of various medical conditions. Several clinical studies have demonstrated its safety and efficacy as a treatment for pain, edema, and soft tissue injury. In this pilot, prospective, randomized and double-blind study, a wearable, energy-emitting PRFE therapy device (MetiMed, Performance Hospital Srl, Seriate, Italy) was used to control postoperative pain and to accelerate wound healing in patients who underwent total knee or reverse shoulder prosthesis. We enrolled in the study 50 consecutive patients who had a total knee arthroplasty or a reverse shoulder prosthesis. The subjects were randomly assigned to receive a placebo or active PRFE device for 20 postoperative days. Postoperative pain was assessed with a 0- to 10-point visual analog scale (VAS). The use of painkillers was also registered. The healing of surgical scars was assessed with Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) (total score ranging from 0 to 13, with 0 representing normal skin). Consecutive VAS scores in the 20 days of the study showed no significant decrease in the control group with a day 1 to day 20 difference of 1.48 VAS points. On the other side, VAS score in the study group showed a steady decline (VAS score difference was 4.2 VAS points). The use of painkillers was lower in the group that received PRFE therapy.VSS score in the active group showed a steady decline (day 1 to day 20 difference was 3.92 VSS points) while the VSS scores showed no significant improvement in the placebo group (0.88 VSS points). According to these findings, PRFE therapy in this form is an excellent, safe, drug-free method of postoperative pain control and wound healing in patients who undergo total knee or reverse shoulder prosthesis.
Article
Full-text available
Pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) therapy can non-invasively treat a variety of pathologies by delivering electric and magnetic fields to tissues via inductive coils. The electromagnetic fields generated by these devices have been found to affect a variety of biological processes and basic science understanding of the underlying mechanisms of action of PEMF treatment has accelerated in the last 10 years. Accumulating clinical evidence supports the use of PEMF therapy in both animals and humans for specific clinical indications including bone healing, wound healing, osteoarthritis and inflammation, and treatment of post-operative pain and edema. While there is some confusion about PEMF as a clinical treatment modality, it is increasingly being prescribed by veterinarians. In an effort to unravel the confusion surrounding PEMF devices, this article reviews important PEMF history, device taxonomy, mechanisms of action, basic science and clinical evidence, and relevant trends in veterinary medicine. The data reviewed underscore the usefulness of PEMF treatment as a safe, non-invasive treatment modality that has the potential to become an important stand-alone or adjunctive treatment modality in veterinary care.
Article
Full-text available
Objective To investigate changes in nucleus pulposus cell expression and secretion of interleukin (IL)-1β and tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α following stimulation with a low-frequency (LF) pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF). Methods Primary rat nucleus pulposus cells were isolated and cultured in vitro, followed by stimulation with LF-PEMFs at a frequency of 2 Hz and different intensities, ranging from 0.5–3.0 A/m. Cells were observed for morphological changes, and proliferation rates were measured by cell viability counts. Expression of IL-1β and TNF-α within the nucleus pulposus cells was measured using western blotting, and levels of IL-1β and TNF-α secreted in the culture media were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Results Stimulation of nucleus pulposus cells with LF-PEMFs did not appear to affect cell morphology or nucleus pulposus cell IL-1β and TNF-α expression levels. LF-PEMFs did not significantly affect cell proliferation, however, levels of IL-1β and TNF-α secreted into the culture media were found to be significantly reduced in an intensity-dependent manner. Conclusion Low-frequency PEMF stimulation may inhibit secretion of IL-1β and TNF-α in cultured nucleus pulposus cells.
Article
Full-text available
Delivery of health care demands evidence-based practice. Evidence-based practice helps to ensure that all facets of health care delivery are subject to a higher level of accountability. This helps to assure that the patient is receiving treatment that has some proof of efficacy. In recent years, physiotherapy practice has been influenced by a swell of research which, in many cases, supports current practice and, in some cases, influences change of practice. Despite the fact that there is a significant increase in the numbers of clinical trials and reviews in Physiotherapy, including research in electromagnetic modalities and mechanical modalities, it is not uncommon for a practitioner to feel at a loss to answer, “Exactly how does this treatment work?” This paper will review the mechanisms of action of the most common electromagnetic modalities and provide a rationale as to why “pulsed” fields seem to produce more significant effects compared with continuous applications. It will be shown that significant tissue healing effects, particularly with the modality PEMF, are likely the result of increased activity in non-excitable cells. The reputation of electromagnetic modalities has suffered in recent years, likely due to a lack of understanding of mechanisms for action. In the literature, the understanding in this area has made considerable progress over the past ten years. This review will explain the science at a cellular level and suggest the potential mechanisms for action for the modalities with specific focus on PEMF.
Article
Full-text available
Inflammation is a complex process involving distinct but overlapping biochemical and molecular events that are highly regulated. Pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) therapy is increasingly used to treat pain and edema associated with inflammation following surgery involving soft tissue. However, the molecular and cellular effects of PEMF therapy on pathways involved in the resolution of inflammation are poorly understood. Using cell culture lines relevant to trauma-induced inflammation of the skin (human dermal fibroblasts, human epidermal keratinocytes, and human mononuclear cells), we investigated the effect of PEMF on gene expression involved in the acute and resolution phases of inflammation. We found that PEMF treatment was followed by changes in the relative amount of messenger (m)RNAs encoding enzymes involved in heme catabolism and removal of reactive oxygen species, including an increase in heme oxygenase 1 and superoxide dismutase 3 mRNAs, in all cell types examined 2 hours after PEMF treatment. A relative increase in mRNAs encoding enzymes involved in lipid mediator biosynthesis was also observed, including an increase in arachidonate 12- and 15-lipoxygenase mRNAs in dermal fibroblasts and epidermal keratinocytes, respectively. The relative amount of both of these lipoxygenase mRNAs was elevated in mononuclear cells following PEMF treatment relative to nontreated cells. PEMF treatment was also followed by changes in the mRNA levels of several cytokines. A decrease in the relative amount of interleukin 1 beta mRNA was observed in mononuclear cells, similar to that previously reported for epidermal keratinocytes and dermal fibroblasts. Based on our results, we propose a model in which PEMF therapy may promote chronic inflammation resolution by mediating gene expression changes important for inhibiting and resolving inflammation.
Article
In this review we compile results cited in reliable journals that show a ratio for the use of pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMF) in therapy, indeed. This is true especially for chronically inflamed joints. Furthermore, we try to link this therapeutic approach to the molecular background of chronic inflammation and arthritis. At first we start with the clinical outcome of PEMF therapy. Then, we look for possible triggers and an electromagnetic counterpart that is endogenously inherent in cell biology and in the tissues of interest. Finally, we want to investigate causal molecular and cellular mechanisms of possible PEMF actions. It shows that there are endogenous mechanisms, indeed, which can act as triggers for PEMF like the resting membrane potential as well as resonance mechanisms in charged moieties like membrane transporters. Especially voltage-gated calcium channels can be triggered. These may lead into specific signaling pathways and also may elicit nitric oxide as well as moderate radical reactions, which can ultimately lead to e.g. NFκB-like reactions. Concerted in the right way, these reactions can cause a kind of cell protection and ultimately lead to a dampening of inflammatory signals like interleukins.
Article
Pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) therapy has been used with success in delayed or nonunion of bone fractures. Its use in the treatment of wound healing is less established. This review article looks at the use of PEMF and its effect on wound healing. The mechanism by which PEMF works is not completely understood, but research has demonstrated its effect on decreasing inflammation through modulation of the calcium/ calmodulin/nitrous oxide pathways, the stimulation of the production of growth factors, and its effect on angiogenesis. Several animal studies have demonstrated improved wound healing with the use of PEMF. This has led to a limited number of double-blind, randomized controlled studies. These studies demonstrate a trend towards improved wound healing; however, they are limited in sample size and only report at the percent of wound healing, without looking at the complete healing of the ulcer. The Food and Drug Administration has not approved PEMF for the treatment of wounds. Further research on its effects on wound healing is needed.
Chapter
Electromagnetic fields (EMFs) of different types (static and time varying, continuous and pulsed), with a wide frequency range (1 Hz – 70 GHz) and with a broad intensity range (1 μT – 15 T) have been reported to interact with immune cells. However, most of the publications lack the basic information, which would explain the choice of a particular signal. In vivo, EMFs have been shown to significantly reduce pain levels in patients suffering from various diseases. This led to hypothesis that the beneficial effects of EMFs could be achieved by regulating inflammatory immune processes. The objective of this paper is to summarize current EMF studies on immune cells such as B and T lymphocytes, and to determine important principles of cellular EMF interactions with the goal to improve our understanding on how EMFs function in medicine. An apparent obstacle to achieving this goal was the lack of information in the published literature on the selection and physical characteristics of a particular EMF signal.
Article
The initial development of pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) therapy and its evolution over the last century for use in clinical surgery has been slow, primarily because of lack of scientifically-derived, evidence-based knowledge of the mechanism of action. Our objective was to review the major scientific breakthroughs and current understanding of the mechanism of action of PEMF therapy, providing clinicians with a sound basis for optimal use. A literature review was conducted, including mechanism of action and biologic and clinical studies of PEMF. Using case illustrations, a holistic exposition on the clinical use of PEMF in plastic surgery was performed. PEMF therapy has been used successfully in the management of postsurgical pain and edema, the treatment of chronic wounds, and in facilitating vasodilatation and angiogenesis. Using scientific support, the authors present the currently accepted mechanism of action of PEMF therapy. This review shows that plastic surgeons have at hand a powerful tool with no known side effects for the adjunctive, noninvasive, nonpharmacologic management of postoperative pain and edema. Given the recent rapid advances in development of portable and economical PEMF devices, what has been of most significance to the plastic surgeon is the laboratory and clinical confirmation of decreased pain and swelling following injury or surgery.