ArticlePDF Available

Abstract

Over the last decades, the European Hamster (Cricetus cricetus) has been declining in many parts of its European range. Due to the lack of recent information on the occurrence and status of the European Hamster in the south-western Carpathian Basin west of the Danube, we used information gathered from prey remains in Common Barn-owl (Tyto alba) pellets. In spite of considerable sampling effort, we retrieved only few hamster remnants. Two skulls were found in Podolje (Croatia) in 2007 and 2016, respectively. Further five hamsters were retrieved from pellets collected in 2017, 11 km to the northwest in Udvar (Hungary). In Sátorhely, 5 km north from Udvar, one roadkill male was found on 27.07.2019. Testimonies from local inhabitants confirmed the current presence of the European Hamster in the area. Our results suggest the presence of a small isolated population in the border area of Croatia (UTM 10 km grid square CR27) and Hungary (CR18, CR19). This small isolated population is on the south-western limit of the range of the species. We presume that the population requires conservation attention because of its isolated position at the edge of the species’ range, its small size and low abundance. We call for a transboundary action by nature conservation authorities in Croatia and Hungary.
Ornis Hungarica 2020. 28(2): 66–73.
DOI: 10.2478/orhu-2020-0017
European Hamster at the edge: declining in
nature and rare in owl pellets×
Jenő j. Purger1,2*, Kornélia kuRuCz1, Dávid SzéP1, Dragica
Purger2,3, Boris KryštuFeK4, Danijel ivajnšič5, Tina KlenovšeK5
& Franc janŽeKovič5
Purger, J. J., Kurucz, K., Szép, D., Purger, D., Kryštufek, B., Ivajnšič, D., Klenovšek, T. &
Janžekovič, F. 2020. European Hamster at the edge: declining in nature and rare in owl pellets.
– Ornis Hungarica 28(2): 66–73. DOI: 10.2478/orhu-2020-0017
Abstract Over the last decades, the European Hamster (Cricetus cricetus) has been declining in many parts of
its European range. Due to the lack of recent information on the occurrence and status of the European Hamster
in the south-western Carpathian Basin west of the Danube, we used information gathered from prey remains
in Common Barn-owl (Tyto alba) pellets. In spite of considerable sampling effort, we retrieved only few ham-
ster remnants. Two skulls were found in Podolje (Croatia) in 2007 and 2016, respectively. Further ve ham-
sters were retrieved from pellets collected in 2017, 11 km to the northwest in Udvar (Hungary). In Sátorhely,
5 km north from Udvar, one roadkill male was found on 27.07.2019. Testimonies from local inhabitants con-
rmed the current presence of the European Hamster in the area. Our results suggest the presence of a small
isolated population in the border area of Croatia (UTM 10 km grid square CR27) and Hungary (CR18, CR19).
This small isolated population is on the south-western limit of the range of the species. We presume that the
population requires conservation attention because of its isolated position at the edge of the species’ range, its
small size and low abundance. We call for a transboundary action by nature conservation authorities in Croa-
tia and Hungary.
Keywords: Baranja, Cricetus cricetus, Croatia, Hungary, Tyto alba
Összefoglalás A mezei hörcsög (Cricetus cricetus) az utóbbi néhány évtizedben európai elterjedési területének
egy jelentős részéről visszaszorult. Aktuális előfordulási adatok hiányában a Dunától nyugatra, a Kárpát-meden-
ce délnyugati részén gyöngybagoly (Tyto alba) köpetekből előkerülő zsákmánymaradványok alapján nyert infor-
mációkat használtuk a mezei hörcsög elterjedésének és státuszának megállapítására. A mintavételezésbe fektetett
jelentős erőfeszítések ellenére csak kevés hörcsög maradványa került elő. A horvátországi Podolje terepülésről
2007-ben és 2016-ban összesen két koponyát, majd 11 km-re északnyugatra a magyarországi Udvar települé-
sen 2017-ben gyűjtött köpetekből 5 mezei hörcsög maradványait mutattuk ki. Udvartól mindössze 5 km-re észa-
ki irányban, Sátorhelynél az úton 2019.07.27-én egy elgázolt hím példányt találtunk. A mezei hörcsög aktuális
jelenlétét a területen a helyi lakosság meggyelései is alátámasztották. Az összegyűlt adatok arra utalnak, hogy
Horvátország (CR27 a 10 km-es UTM háló alapján) és Magyarország (CR18, CR19) határmenti területén él egy
kis elszigetelt populáció, mely a faj elterjedési területének délnyugati határán van. Megítélésünk szerint ez a po-
puláció megérdemli a természetvédelem gyelmét, mivel a faj elterjedési területének peremén található, helyze-
te elszigetelt, mérete kicsi, és a hörcsögök előfordulási gyakorisága alacsony. Horvátország és Magyarország ter-
mészetvédelmi hatóságait határon átnyúló fellépésre hívjuk fel.
Kulcsszavak: Baranya, Cricetus cricetus, Horvátország, Magyarország, Tyto alba
1
Department of Ecology, Institute of Biology, University of Pécs, 7624 Pécs, Ifjúság útja 6., Hungary
2
BioRes Limited Partnership, 7624 Pécs, Barackvirág utca 27., Hungary
3
Department of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Pécs, 7624 Pécs, Rókus utca 2., Hungary
Received: October 31, 2020 – November 06, 2020 – November 09, 2020
×
Presented at 2
nd
Hungarian Owl Research Conference held in Pécs on 11
th
September 2020.
67
J. J. Purger, K. Kurucz, D. Szép, D. Purger, B. Kryštufek,
D. Ivajnšič, T. Klenovšek & F. Janžekovič
Introduction
The European Hamster (Cricetus cricetus) has been a common inhabitant of agricultural
landscape in many parts of Europe and Asia. During population outbreaks, hamsters were
serious pests to crops (Nechay 2000). Since the 1950s, populations in western and central
parts of Europe experienced gradual decline, which was observed also in the western Car-
pathian Basin (Surov et al. 2016, Banaszek et al. 2020, Kryštufek et al. 2020). Chain of
events like habitat fragmentation and degradation, including a decline in food supplies, al-
so damped down its population cycles (Nechay 2008). An increase in winter precipitation
and widespread monocultures further contributed to population decline (Tissier et al. 2016).
Small, fragmented and isolated populations are vulnerable to various threats, which accel-
erate their further decline and nally lead to extinction (Weinhold 2008). Improvements in
land management are a crucial step to avoid further decline (Tissier et al. 2016). The IUCN
status of the species is Critically Endangered which was justied by a decline in reproduc-
tive rate, population size and distributional range.
Recent surveys retrieved local hamster extinctions in certain parts of Hungary, includ-
ing Southern Transdanubia (e.g. Bihari 2004, 2007, Cserkész 2017, Kondor & Cserkész
2017). In this communication, we address the situation in the Baranya region. Baranya (al-
so Baranja) is a at plain between the Drava and Danube Rivers and is administratively di-
vided between Hungary and Croatia. European Hamsters used to be widespread and com-
mon throughout the Croatian part of the region (Petrov 1992) but are now restricted to the
southern part of the Hungarian Baranya (Nechay 2000). The hamster population in Bara-
nya is of particular conservation interest for at least two reasons. Because of recent decline
(Bihari 2007, Cserkész 2017, Kondor & Cserkész 2017), it requires conservation manage-
ment on its own. Equally important, Baranya anchors the entire hamster population along
the Drava in Croatia and Slovenia. This population is in a shape of a long (c. 200 km) and
very narrow stripe (up to 20 km) which stretches – presumably continuously – on the right
bank of the river. Gene ow in this narrow corridor can become disrupted at any point and
at any time, making the right bank of the Drava a deadly effective population trap for ham-
sters. The area is densely populated and heavily used for agriculture. The majority of infor-
mation on hamsters is from the early 1970s (Ružić 1978, Petrov 1992) and is therefore pri-
marily of historical interest. There are no hamsters on the left bank of the Drava River in
Hungary (Bihari 2007, Cserkész 2017), however, during an outbreak in the 1980s, the ham-
ster population spread toward the Drava Plain till the western edge of Baranya County, Hun-
gary (Nechay 2000).
The presence of European Hamsters at the far end of the Drava in Slovenia was conrmed
for the rst time in May 1980. Two specimens were found in the vicinity of the village
Obrež, situated alongside the road Ormož – Središče ob Dravi (Kryštufek 1987). This tiny
population is very marginal and restricted to a narrow strip of agricultural habitat between
4
Slovenian Museum of Natural History, 1000 Ljubljana, Prešernova 20., Slovenia
5
Faculty of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, University of Maribor, 2000 Maribor, Koroška cesta 160., Slovenia
*corresponding author, e-mail: purgerjj@gmail.com
ORNIS HUNGARICA 2020. 28(2)
68
the hilly area to the north and the river to the south. The last individual was recorded in late
1990s and recent observations yielded no positive evidence on the animal. The conservation
status in Croatia was reviewed by Tvrtković (2006), but this account includes hardly any
new evidence. Tvrtković mainly stressed the lack of recent scientic information. While the
current situation in Croatia is enigmatic, the European Hamster presumably still has consid-
erable populations in the lowland to the east of the Danube in Hungary and Voivodina (the
northern part of Serbia) (Banaszek et al. 2020).
In the Hungarian Baranya, the European Hamster is very rare (Bihari 2007, Cserkész
2017, Kondor & Cserkész 2017), hence its detection is a difcult task. In such cases,
mammalogists frequently collect information from remnants found in pellets of avian
predators, particularly owls. Owl pellet analysis is an important supplementary meth-
od in small mammal surveys (Mikuska et al. 1979, Horváth et al. 2007). In contrast to
trapping, it can be particularly effective in monitoring difcult-to-detect small mammals
(Torre et al. 2004, Heisler et al. 2016). The method has its limitations, e.g. the exact lo-
cation of a small mammal prey can only be assumed. Despite this, the information gath-
ered from the owl pellets can facilitate and direct further research, which can utilize dif-
ferent eld techniques.
Research in Hungary retrieved the European Hamster as an important and frequent prey
of the large-bodied Eurasian Eagle-owl (Bubo bubo), while the smaller Common Barn-owl
(Tyto alba) and the Northern Long-eared Owl (Asio otus) preyed on hamsters only rare-
ly or extremely rarely (Bihari et al. 2008). The Common Barn-owl prefers open areas dur-
ing hunting (Taylor 1994) and, as an opportunistic feeder, consumes prey in proportion to
its abundance in the hunting habitat (Tores et al. 2005). Although the European Hamster is
not an easy prey due to its comparatively large and robust body and aggressive behaviour
(Kryštufek et al. 2020), we still presumed that the Common Barn-owl should be able to cap-
ture juvenile European Hamsters, e.g. at the time they start feeding above ground.
Our goal in this study was twofold. Firstly, we aimed to re-evaluate the current distribu-
tion of the European Hamster in Southern Transdanubia, relying primarily on the results of
owl pellet analyses. In order to complete the distributional picture, we also used unpublished
observations and literature data. Another goal was to re-draw attention to the importance of
owl pellet collections and analyses in the detection of elusive small mammals and in per-
forming a non-invasive monitoring.
Material and methods
Our database on prey composition of Common Barn-owl pellets contains information
gained between the years 2007–2017 (Croatian part of Baranya, and Udvar in Hungary) and
is based on remnants of 11,792 small mammal individuals. The database is stored at the De-
partment of Ecology, University of Pécs. We extracted the information on the occurrence of
hamster present in the study area, as well as on their relative abundance (Yom-Tov & Wool
1997). We completed the list of hamster records by interviews carried out among local or-
nithologists and upon sporadical inspection of roadkills (one skeleton is preserved in the
69
J. J. Purger, K. Kurucz, D. Szép, D. Purger, B. Kryštufek,
D. Ivajnšič, T. Klenovšek & F. Janžekovič
Natural History Museum of Slovenia). The four persons were included in searching for ty-
pi cal hamster holes (burrows) in agricultural habitats. Walking in transects about 5 meters
apart, we examined the agricultural plots suggested by the hamster observers and also those
areas, which we considered as potential habitats based on our own experience. In the period
between 2018 and 2020, searching was performed two times in spring and three times in au-
tumn in the areas north of the Croatian settlement of Podolje, and ve times in Hungary in
the area enclosed by the Udvar, Sátorhely, Nagynyárád and Majs settlements.
Results and discussion
Positive records of European Hamsters in Baranya are summarized in Table 1. All sites are
located close to the international border between Croatia and Hungary (Figure 1). Three re-
cords are from Common Barn-owl pellets, one observation was a road casualty, and two
were reliable verbal reports (Table 1). One of the records is historic (1988) but we still list it
to document more thoroughly the status of the hamster in this part of Baranya.
For the hamster from Podolje, we were not certain if it had been preyed by the Common
Barn-owl near its resting site (Table 1). In 2007, we carefully sampled owl pellets in Cro-
atia between the Drava and Danube rivers and the Hungarian border but found no further
hamsters (Szép et al. 2018). Earlier detailed surveys in this part of Croatia (e.g. Mikuska
et al. 1978, Mikuska & Vuković 1980, Tórizs 2010, 2011) similarly did not detect a single
European Hamster. The species, however, was reported for the area prior to the mid-1970s
(Ružić 1978, Petrov 1992). Despite this, we concluded that a single skull does not provide
Map
Id
Locality,
Country Latitude Longitude Date Mode Material Source
1Podolje,
Croatia 45.815394 18.728147 28.09.2007 Owl pellets
1, juv,
skull and
mandible
Szép et al.
2018
1Podolje,
Croatia 45.815394 18.728147 29.10.2016 Owl pellets
1, juv,
skull and
mandible
own data
2Udvar,
Hungary 45.900367 18.659647 16.03.2017 Owl pellets
5, juv,
skull and
mandible
own data
3Sátorhely,
Hungary 45.942702 18.643589 27.07.2019 Roadkill 1, male,
carcass own data
4Majs,
Hungary 45.917971 18.632420 2015–2020 Observation
in nature
Csaba László,
pers. comm.
5Babarc,
Hungary 46.002709 18.551715 1988 Observation
in nature
Tamás Treitz,
pers. comm.
Table 1. Occurrences of European Hamster (Cricetus cricetus) in the border region of Croatia and
Hungary
1. táblázat Mezei hörcsög (Cricetus cricetus) előfordulások Horvátország és Magyarország határmenti
régiójában
ORNIS HUNGARICA 2020. 28(2)
70
indisputable evidence on the presence of the hamster but instead left open the possibility that
the owls might prey the hamster to the east of the Danube in the nearby Serbia.
A subsequent survey, repeated in 2016, revealed a young hamster skull from the same lo-
cation (Table 1, Figure 1). A year later a large pellet sample was collected from the attic of a
family house in Udvar (the Hungarian side of Baranya), which contained skeletal remnants
of ve hamsters (Table 1, Figure 1). The site was so close to the Hungarian-Croatian border
that hamsters could be preyed upon on either side.
Intensive owl pellet surveys have been continuously undertaken in Baranya (the southern
county of Hungary) since 1985. European Hamster remains were not found either in the rst
ten years (Horváth 1999) or in subsequent surveys (e.g. Horváth 1998). Such a lack of evi-
dence is surprising, as hamsters were present in Southern Transdanubia during the last deca-
des of the 20
th
century (Nechay 2000, Bihari 2004). Near the current nding site (Figure 1), it
was observed in Babarc (CR19) in spring 1988 (Tamás Treitz, pers. comm.). We accepted the
presence of the European Hamsters in Hungary as proven after a road casualty was found at
Sátorhely (Table 1, Figure 1). Mr. Csaba László drew our attention to the carcass of the ham-
ster that he collected. He recollected another observation of European Hamster nearby a few
years earlier. In his testimony, hunters also observed hamsters on nearby elds (in the area of
settlement Majs) several times during the last ve years (Csaba László, pers. comm.). In 2019,
we surveyed the vicinity of the site of the road casualty, as well as potentially suitable habitats
in Croatia, but found no sign on the presence of the European Hamster.
Our survey covered only a small surface area in the border between Croatia and Hunga-
ry. The question remains whether there are still hamster habitats in the southern section of
Figure 1. Occurrences of European Hamster (Cricetus cricetus) in the border region of Croatia and
Hungary (1–5), on the south-western limit of its distribution range
1. ábra A mezei hörcsög (Cricetus cricetus) előfordulási helyszínei Horvátország és Magyarország
határmenti régiójában (1–5), elterjedési területének délnyugati határán
71
J. J. Purger, K. Kurucz, D. Szép, D. Purger, B. Kryštufek,
D. Ivajnšič, T. Klenovšek & F. Janžekovič
Drava in Slavonia and further west. In Hungary, no hamsters were found in Common Barn-
owl pellets collected along the Drava and Mura (e.g. Horváth 1998, Purger 1998, Szép et
al. 2017), but similar surveys have never been conducted on the Croatian side (Tvrtković
2006). It would therefore be important to urgently perform this task.
Conclusion
Results of the Common Barn-owl pellet analyses and further data from eld observations
proved that a small isolated population of the European Hamster is still present in the
Croatian-Hungarian border area. The habitat patch, which is estimated to cover an area of
20 × 10 km is on the south-western limit of the hamster’s distribution range. Without prop-
er attention and timely conservation measures, and in the absence of further population
monitoring, hamsters can easily vanish from this area in the near future, just like they did
in many parts of their European range. To counterbalance the negative population trend, a
joint coordinated action by the relevant nature conservation authorities and cross-border
cooperation is urgently needed, here and now.
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to Csaba László, Tamás Treitz and Béla Simonkovics for their information
and help during the work and Ákos Halmai for his help in preparing the map. The project
“Bilateral Scientic and Technological (TéT) Cooperation Hungarian-Slovenian Relation
(2018-2.1.11-TÉT-SI-2018-00015)” was implemented with the support of the National Re-
search, Development and Innovation Ofce from the NKFIH Fund and Slovenian Research
Agency project nb. BI-HU/19-20-009.
Banaszek, A., Bogomolov, P., Feoktistova, N., La Haye, M., Monecke, S., Reiners, T. E., Rusin, M., Surov, A.,
Weinhold, U. & Ziomek, J. 2020. Cricetus cricetus. – The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2020: e.
T5529A111875852. DOI: 10.2305/IUCN.UK.2020-2.RLTS.T5529A111875852.en (Downloaded on 04 Oc-
tober 2020.)
Bihari, Z. 2004. A hörcsög (Cricetus cricetus) magyarországi elterjedésének változása az elmúlt 50 év alatt
[Changes in the distribution of Hamster (Cricetus cricetus) in Hungary during the past fty years]. – Termé-
szetvédelmi Közlemények 11: 559−566. (in Hungarian with English Summary)
Bihari, Z. 2007. Mezei hörcsög Cricetus cricetus (Linnaeus, 1758) [European Hamster]. – In: Bihari, Z., Csorba,
G. & Heltai, M. (eds.) Magyarország emlőseinek atlasza [Atlas of mammals in Hungary]. – Kossuth Kiadó,
Budapest, pp. 176−178. (in Hungarian with English Summary)
Bihari, Z., Horváth, M., Lanszki, J. & Heltai, M. 2008. Role of the Common Hamster (Cricetus cricetus) in the di-
et of natural predators in Hungary. – In: Millesi, E., Winkler, H. & Hengsberger, R. (eds.) The Common Ham-
ster (Cricetus cricetus): Perspectives on an endangered species. Austrian Academy of Sciences, Wien. – Bio-
systematics and Ecology Series 25: 61–68.
Cserkész, T. 2017. A mezei hörcsög aktuális helyzete [The current distribution of the European Hamster]. – In:
Holes, A. (ed.) Magyarország környezeti állapota 2016 [The state of the environment in Hungary in 2016]. –
Herman Ottó Intézet, Budapest, pp. 76–81. (in Hungarian)
References
ORNIS HUNGARICA 2020. 28(2)
72
Heisler, L. M., Somers, C. M. & Poulin, R. G. 2016. Owl pellets: a more effective alternative to conventional trap-
ping for broad-scale studies of small mammal communities. – Methods in Ecology and Evolution 7(1): 96–
103. DOI: 10.1111/2041-210X.12454
Horváth, G., Jurčević Agić, I., Merdić, E., Tórizs, I. & Purger, J. J. 2007. Small mammal monitoring based on the
analysis of owl pellets. – In: Purger, J. J. (ed.) Manual for the investigation of biodiversity along the Drava
River. – University of Pécs, pp. 203–217. (in Croatian)
Horváth, Gy. 1998. Kisemlős (Mammalia) faunisztikai vizsgálatok a gyöngybagoly (Tyto alba) köpetanalízise
alapján a Dráva mentén (1995–1997) [The investigation of the small mammal fauna of the River Dráva plain
region, based on the analysis of Barn Owl (Tyto alba) pellets between 1995–1997]. – Dunántúli Dolgozatok
(Publicationes Transdanubiensis) Természettudományi Sorozat (Studia Pannonica) 9: 475–488. (in Hunga ri-
an with English Summary)
Horváth, Gy. 1999. A gyöngybagoly (Tyto alba Scop., 1769) köpetvizsgálatának tíz éve Baranya megyében
(1985–1994) [Ten years of Barn Owl (Tyto alba Scop., 1769) pellet analysis in county Baranya]. – Állattani
Közlemények 84: 63–77. (in Hungarian with English Summary)
Kondor, T. & Cserkész, T. 2017. A mezei hörcsög (Cricetus cricetus) populációs trendjének és elterjedésének vál-
tozása Magyarországon [Changes in the population trend and distribution of the European Hamster (Cricetus
cricetus) in Hungary]. – Bükki Emlőstani Kutatócsoport Egyesület, Eger, pp. 18. (in Hungarian)
Kryštufek, B. 1987. Hrček (Cricetus cricetus Linnaeus, 1758; Rodentia, Mammalia) edini stepski sesalec v slo-
venski favni [Hamster (Cricetus cricetus Linneaeus, 1785; Rodentia, Mammalia) the only steppe mammal in
the Slovene fauna]. – Varstvo Narave 13: 93–98. (in Slovenian with English Summary)
Kryštufek, B., Hoffmann, I. E., Nedyalkov, N., Pozdnyakov, A. & Vohralík, V. 2020. Cricetus cricetus (Rodentia:
Cricetidae). – Mammalian Species 52(988): 10–26. DOI: 10.1093/mspecies/seaa001
Mikuska, J. & Vuković, S. 1980. Kvalitativna i kvantitativna analiza ishrane kukuvije drijemavice, Tyto al-
ba Scop. 1769, na području Baranje, sa posebnim osvrtom na rasprostranjenost sitnih sisavaca [Qualita-
tive and quantitative analysis of the diet of Common Barn-owl, Tyto alba Scop. 1769, in Baranja region,
with a focus on the distribution of small mammals]. – Larus (31–32): 269–288. (in Croatian with German
Summary)
Mikuska, J., Pivar, G. & Pančić, S. 1978. Analiza ishrane kukuvije drijemavice, Tyto alba Scop. 1769, na po-
dručju Specijalnog zoološkog rezervata „Kopački rit” i okoline s posebnim osvrtom na faunu sitnih sisava-
ca [Diet analysis of Common Barn-owl, Tyto alba Scop. 1769, in the area of the Special Zoological Reserve
“Kopački rit” and the surrounding area, with a focus on the fauna of small mammals]. – Priroda Vojvodine
4: 45–46. (in Serbo-Croatian).
Mikuska, J., Tvrtković, N. & Džukić, G. 1979. Collecting and analysis of bird pellets as one more important meth-
ods for studying the fauna of Mammals in Yugoslavia. – Archives of Biological Sciences 29(3–4): 157–160.
Nechay, G. 2000. Status of Hamsters: Cricetus cricetus, Cricetus migratorius, Mesocricetus newtoni and other
hamster species in Europe. – Council of Europe Publishing, Strasbourg, France, Nature and Environment
Series 106.
Nechay, G. 2008. Peak numbers of Cricetus cricetus (L.): do they appear simultaneously? – In: Millesi, E., Win-
kler, H. & Hengsberger, R. (eds.) The Common Hamster (Cricetus cricetus): Perspectives on an endangered
species. – Austrian Academy of Sciences, Wien. – Biosystematics and Ecology Series 25: 69–77.
Petrov, B. M. 1992. Mammals of Yugoslavia: Insectivores and Rodents. – Natural History Museum in Belgrade,
Special issues 37: 1–186.
Purger, J. J. 1998. A Dráva mente Somogy megyei szakaszának kisemlős (Mammalia) faunája, gyöngybagoly,
Tyto alba (Scopoli, 1769) köpetek vizsgálata alapján [Small mammal fauna of the region of Drava river in
county Somogy (Hungary), obtained by Barn Owl, Tyto alba (Scopoli, 1769) pellet analysis]. – Dunántúli
Dolgozatok (Publicationes Transdanubiensis) Természettudományi Sorozat (Studia Pannonica) 9: 489–500.
(in Hungarian with English Summary)
Ružić, A. 1978. Distribution and abundance of the Common Hamster (Cricetus cricetus Linnaeus, 1758; Roden-
tia, Mammalia) in Yugoslavia. – Biosistematika 4(1): 203–208. (in Serbo-Croatian with English Summary)
Surov, A., Banaszek, A., Bogomolov, P., Feoktistova, N. & Monecke, S. 2016. Dramatic global decrease in the
range and reproduction rate of the European Hamster Cricetus cricetus. – Endangered Species Research 31:
119–145. DOI: 10.3354/esr00749
Szép, D., Horváth, G. F., Krčmar, S. & Purger, J. J. 2018. Connection between prey composition and the land-
scape structure in the hunting area of Barn Owls (Tyto alba) in Baranja (Croatia). – Periodicum Biologorum
120(2–3): 125–233. DOI: 10.18054/pb.v120i2-3.6650
73
J. J. Purger, K. Kurucz, D. Szép, D. Purger, B. Kryštufek,
D. Ivajnšič, T. Klenovšek & F. Janžekovič
Szép, D., Klein, Á. & Purger, J. J. 2017. The prey composition of the Barn Owl (Tyto alba) with respect to land-
scape structure of its hunting area (Zala County, Hungary). – Ornis Hungarica 25(2): 51–64. DOI: 10.1515/
orhu-2017-0015
Taylor, I. R. 1994. Barn Owls: Predator – Prey Relationships and Conservation. – Cambridge University Press,
Cambridge, 304 p.
Tissier, M. L., Handrich, Y., Robin, J-P., Weitten, M., Pevet, P., Kourkgy, C. & Habold, C. 2016. How maize mon-
oculture and increasing winter rainfall have brought the hibernating European Hamster to the verge of extinc-
tion. – Scientic Reports 6: 25531. DOI: 10.1038/srep25531
Tores, M., Motro, Y., Motro, U. & Yom-Tov, Y. 2005. The Barn Owl – a selective opportunist predator. – Israel
Journal of Zoology 51(4): 349–360. DOI: 10.1560/7862-9E5G-RQJJ-15BE
Tórizs, I. 2010. A gyöngybagoly [Tyto alba (Scop.) 1769] monitorozása a Drávaszögben, különös tekintettel a
táplálkozásbiológiára [Monitoring of the Common Barn-owl (Tyto alba (Scop.) 1769) in Baranja, with spe-
cial regard to feeding biology]. – MS Thesis, University of West Hungary, Sopron, 67 p. (in Hungarian)
Tórizs, I. 2011. Gyöngybagolyvédelem a Drávaszögben [The conservation of Common Barn-owl in Baranja]. –
Rovátkák 3: 34–54. (in Hungarian)
Torre, I., Arrizabalaga, A. & Flaquer, C. 2004. Three methods for assessing richness and composition of small
mammal communities. – Journal of Mammalogy 85(3): 524–530. DOI: 10.1644/BJK-112
Tvrtković, N. 2006. Hrčak / Common Hamster Cricetus cricetus (Linnaeus, 1758). – In: Tvrtković, N. (ed.) Crve-
na knjiga sisavaca Hrvatske [Red book of mammals of Croatia]. – Ministry of Culture, State Institute for Na-
ture Protection, Republic of Croatia, Zagreb, pp. 87–88. (in Croatian)
Weinhold, U. 2008. Draft European action plan for the conservation of the Common Hamster (Cricetus cricetus
L., 1758). – Convention on the conservation of European wildlife and natural habitats, 28
th
Meeting of the
Standing Committee, Council of Europe, Strasbourg, France, 36 p.
Yom-Tov, Y. & Wool, D. 1997. Do the Contents of Barn Owl Pellets Accurately Represent the Proportion of Prey
Species in the Field? – The Condor 99(4): 972−976. DOI: 10.2307/1370149
... Pellets provide a presumptive location rather than a certain location of small mammalian prey. Nevertheless, it can create a link between hunting and pellet extraction sites, thus facilitating and leading to further research with other techniques [3]. If the size of the predator's hunting area is known, it can be a clue to determine in which habitats the small mammal among their prey can be found. ...
Article
Full-text available
In this study, prey remains in the owl pellets collected from Ağrı province (Eastern Anatolia) were examined. In the contents of the owl pellets, Suncus etruscus, Crocidura sp. (Eulipotyphla), Microtus sp. (Rodentia) and unidentified bird remains were found. The remains of the Suncus etruscus, which are frequently found in owl pellets, are important in terms of determining the distribution limits of this species.
... Pellets provide a presumptive location rather than a certain location of small mammalian prey. Nevertheless, it can create a link between hunting and pellet extraction sites, thus facilitating and leading to further research with other techniques [3]. If the size of the predator's hunting area is known, it can be a clue to determine in which habitats the small mammal among their prey can be found. ...
Article
A new record of Suncus etruscus from Eastern Anatolia was presented in this study. The record is based on jawbones and skull obtained from owl pellets. This cryptic species, which is very difficult to catch and observe alive, can be found in pellets. Therefore, findings based on pellets make it easier to obtain data on the distribution area of the species.
Article
Full-text available
Cricetus cricetus (Linnaeus, 1758) is a medium-sized cricetid commonly called the common hamster. A sexually dimor-phic rodent of unique coloration with robust body, blunt head, short legs, and rudimentary tail, it is the largest hamster and the only species in the genus Cricetus. It is easily recognizable by a color pattern of contrasting dark and light areas. Because its distribution extends from northwestern Europe to eastern China across 5,500 km of low altitude agricultural land, steppe, and forest steppe, the frequently used term European hamster is misleading. Both geographic range and relative abundance started declining in the 1960s on the western edge of its distribution, and now C. cricetus is protected by the Bern Convention and the Fauna-Flora-Habitats Directives.
Article
Full-text available
Background and purpose: The assumption that the species composition and the relative abundance of small mammals in pellets of Barn Owls reflects the landscape structure of the hunting area is tested, based on habitat preferences of small mammals identified from pellets collected in the hilly and lowland parts of Baranja county (Croatia). Materials and methods: During 2007 we collected 2395 whole pellets and their fragments in 21 localities, from which 6613 prey remains were identified as belonging to small mammals (99.5%) of 23 species. The correlation between the relative abundance of mammal species and landscape structures (habitat types and landscape features) was tested. Results: There was a significant correlation between the relative abundance of seven small mammal species and the proportion of particular landscape structure classes. The number of small mammal species showed a negative correlation with the area of inland marshes. The evenness of the small mammal fauna grew with the mosaicity of landscape and the length of the borders in the owl’s hunting area. In the total prey the Common Vole (Microtus arvalis) dominated with more than 62%, which indicates its population outbreak. The diversity and evenness of small mammals in the hilly and lowland regions did not differ. Conclusions: We found significant correlations between the relative abundance of some small mammal species and the landscape structure classes in the owls’ hunting area. Our results suggested that the diversity of small mammals increases as the mosaic of the landscape increases, while the degree of population outbreak of the Common Vole decreases. These relationships should be taken into consideration when designing landscapes or changing land use.
Article
Full-text available
The prey composition of the Barn Owl (Tyto alba) can be monitored indirectly by pellet analysis and we used this method to investigate less known small mammal species of Zala County. The number and abundance of small mammal species depend on the structure of the landscape of Barn Owls' hunting area, therefore we analysed landscape features in the surrounding circles with 2 km radius around the sampling sites. In 2016 we collected 1106 pellets from 13 sampling localities. From the pellets we identified 21 species of 3022 individuals of small mammals (more than 98% of prey). Among the 21 species there was the rare Parti-colured Bat (Vespertilio murinus) and a new species for the county the Steppe Mouse (Mus spicilegus). Positive correlation was found between the diversity of the small mammal fauna of each sampling site and the landscape complexity (number of the landscape patches) of the Barn Owl hunting area. Relative abundance of the Wood Mouse (Apodemus sylvaticus) showed positive correlation with the number of landscape patches, while the abundance of the Lesser White-toothed Shrew (Crocidura suaveolens), the Miller's Water Shrew (Neomys anomalus), the Striped Field Mouse (Apodemus agrarius) and the Harvest Mouse (Micromys minutus) was higher in hunting areas with more homogenous landscapes. Significant correlations were found between the relative abundance of some small mammal species and the landscape structure of the potential hunting area of owls that confirmed the consistency in habitat preference of some species. Our results proved that the prey-composition of Barn Owls reflects the land use through the distribution and abundance of small mammal species, therefore this method is suitable for ecological analyses of landscape.
Article
Full-text available
Although the European hamster is probably the fastest-declining Eurasian mammal, its IUCN Red List status is still Least Concern. In addition to the huge distribution area, this categorization is based on the assumptions (1) that the decline affects only Western Europe, where (2) modern agriculture has led to (3) an increase in the mortality of the species. Since mortality- reducing protection measures in Western Europe have been unable to stop the decline, we reviewed the literature from 1765 to the present and reappraised the situation. We found support for none of these assumptions. The species has also vanished from more than 75% of its range in Central and Eastern Europe. In 48 of 85 Russian, Belarussian, Ukrainian and Moldovan provinces, its relative occurrence has decreased. It is now rare in 42 provinces and extinct in 8. Mortality has not increased, but the reproduction rate has shrunk since 1954 throughout the distribution area. Today the reproduction rate is only 23% of that between 1914 and 1935. Taking into account the mortality of this prey species, 1 female today raises only 0.5 females for next year’s reproduction. The extrapolation of the literature data points to an extinction of the species between 2020 and 2038. We strongly recommend (1) changing the status of the European hamster on the IUCN Red List from Least Concern at least to Vulnerable or even Endangered and (2) supporting scientific research on the reproduction of European hamsters as a protection measure. Global threats such as climate change, light pollution or (in the past) fur trapping are more likely to be the ultimate reason for the decline of this species than modern agriculture.
Article
Full-text available
Over the last decades, climate change and agricultural intensification have been identified as two major phenomena negatively affecting biodiversity. However, little is known about their effects on the lifehistory traits of hibernating species living in agro-ecosystems. The European hamster (Cricetus cricetus), once a common rodent on agricultural land, is now on the verge of extinction in France. Despite the implemented measures for its protection, populations are still in sharp decline but the reasons for it remain unclear. To investigate how environmental change has affected this hibernating rodent, we used a data set based on 1468 recordings of hamster body mass at emergence from hibernation from 1937 to 2014. We reveal the adverse effects of increasing winter rainfall and maize monoculture intensification on the body mass of wild hamsters. Given the links that exist between body mass, reproductive success and population dynamics in mammals, these results are of particular importance to understand the decline of this species. In view of the rates of maize monoculture intensification and the predicted increase in winter rainfall, it is of the utmost importance to improve land management in Western Europe to avoid the extinction of this species.
Article
Full-text available
Prey composition of Barn Owl (Tyto alba) pellets from northwestern Negev, Israel, was ex-amined. The 414 individual specimens of mammals represented by 256 pellets comprised: 9.2% Meriones sacramenti, 41.1% M. tristrami, 8.2% Gerbillus an-dersoni, 40.1% Mus musculus, and 1.4% Crocidura suaveolens. The pellets also contained some remains of insects, small specimens of the snake Ery.x jaculus, and two passerine birds. We tested whether the ob-served distribution of prey species in the 256 pellets could be obtained if owls hunted at random. Direct calculation and simulations indicate that more single-species pellets contained large mammals than would be expected from random sampling. In simulation of owls sampling at random from the database, the dis-tribution of "pellets" containing 1, 2, 3, or more prey items was similar to the observed distribution only when a cumulative weight limit for pellet ejection was set at SO-100 g. Even when Barn Owls do not hunt some species preferentially, the contents of the pellets may be biased towards larger prey. This result should be taken into consideration when accumulated pellets are used in ecological and paleontological studies to approximate the distribution of mammal prey in real communities, present or past.
Article
Full-text available
There are differing views in the literature regarding the feeding strategy of the barn owl (Tyto alba, Strigiformes). Whereas some authors conclude that the barn owl is a selective predator, selecting to prey on certain species, oth- ers maintain that it is an opportunist. We studied the diet composition of barn owls from agricultural fields in northern Israel, using pellet analysis. Over 4,000 prey items were identified, comprising a total of at least 27 species. We found that during 1997–2001 there was a significant change in the barn owl’s diet: it switched its main prey species from the Levant vole (Microtus guent theri) to two other Myomorpha species, the house mouse (Mus musculus) and Tristram’s jird (Meriones tristrami), probably as a result of changes in the field abundance of the main prey items. Hence, although our barn owls select one prey species at a certain period of time, they exhibit an opportunistic feature in their ability to easily switch between prey items in their diet.
Chapter
Full-text available
Hamster (Cricetus cricetus) living in agricultural lands is a very important prey species of many predatory birds and mammals searching prey in same habitats in Hungary. In some areas it can be found in high densities, where it is the main prey of some strictly protected predators. Hamsters are attached to open agricultural areas, so they are frequently preyed by predators foraging in these habitat types. Hamsters were found in pellets of 14 birds and stomachs of 7 carnivores studied in Hungary. In some regions during gradation the rate of hamsters reached 70-80% in the pellets of Eagle owl (Bubo bubo) and Imperial Eagle (Aquila heliaca), so it was the main prey of these strictly protected animals. The importance of hamster as a prey species is variable and it is changing between years of gradation and also between the different gradations. In our study we suggest that the relatively rare predators have no serious impact on hamster populations, but hamsters can have a very important role in the diet of these strictly protected predators. Therefore the protection of these species is highly depending on the conservation of hamster.
Article
Full-text available
Analysis of pellets of Tyto alba and scats of Genetta genetta and Sherman livetrapping were compared to assess richness and composition of small mammal communities in a Mediterranean area (NE Spain). Owl pellets provided 17 small mammal species (17,232 individuals), genet scats 14 species (2,145 individuals), and livetrapping 9 species (1,488 individuals). Owl pellets oversampled insectivores and grassland rodents and undersampled tree-dwelling and woodland rodents. Genet scats and livetrapping oversampled woodland rodents and undersampled insectivores and grassland rodents. After controlling for sample size and elevation differences between methods by means of analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) and rarefaction, owl pellets contained higher richness for small samples (<50 individuals), and scats contained higher richness for large samples (>100 individuals), both having higher richness than livetrapping regardless of sample size. We concluded that both indirect methods provided complementary information of small mammal communities, detecting the 19 small mammal species known to be present in the study area.
Article
Small mammal community composition is almost universally estimated from conventional trapping, which is logistically difficult to scale up for landscape‐level assessments. Owl pellets may be a more effective alternative for measuring small mammal community composition over large geographic areas due to the relative ease and low cost of field collections. However, owl pellets may introduce sampling biases that differ from those associated with conventional trapping. A thorough comparison to conventional traps is required before owl pellets can be widely adopted as an alternative research tool for small mammal studies. We conducted a literature review of owl diet‐prey availability studies to: (i) compare small mammal community composition between owl pellets and trapping when the two methods were used simultaneously and (ii) assess the influence of owl genus and habitat type on community composition estimated by these two methods. We used data from 27 published studies, which allowed for 32 comparisons between owl pellets and trapping conducted simultaneously. These studies included 15 owl species from five common genera from different major habitats. Rarefied estimates showed that owls consistently sampled identical or higher species richness compared to conventional trapping. Richness estimates rarefied to the lowest sample size per study were not statistically identical (μ Δrichness = 0·20 ± 0·09 SE , P = 0·30); on average, 0·95 ± 0·13 SE additional species were identified from pellets compared to trapping. Measures of species dominance and evenness estimated from both methods were statistically identical (μ Δ1‐D = 0·02 ± 0·03 SE ; μ Δ PIE = 0·004 ± 0·04 SE ). Species lists, relative species composition and species rank‐order abundance were in moderate agreement between sampling methods (Jaccard = 0·62 ± 0·04 SE ; Bray–Curtis = 0·53 ± 0·04 SE ; Spearman rho = 0·41 ± 0·07 SE ). Linear regression and AIC model selection showed that the performance of pellets versus traps did not differ based on owl genus or habitat type. Small mammal community composition estimated via pellets was better represented compared to estimates from conventional trapping. Composition metrics from the two methods were consistent and not affected by owl genera or habitat type. Thus, owls are an effective alternative for landscape‐level assessments of small mammal communities.