ArticlePDF Available

Surgical management of lung cancer in patient with deep brain stimulator: a challenge for safe hemostasis

Authors:
Discussion
Deep brain stimulators have been effective in
treating movement disorders since 1997. The reported
harmful side effects of using diathermy in a patient
with DBS range from electrical shock” sensation to
severe brain injury leading to a vegetative state. The
former patient underwent Mohs microsurgery for left
cheek basal cell carcinoma removal. He described a
lancinating electrical shock sensation through his left
arm and leg during the use of monopolar diathermy.
The latter patient had diathermy treatment after teeth
extraction, during which his neurological status
deteriorated, and investigations revealed permanent
diencephalic and brainstem lesions.
DBS guidelines recommend avoiding the use of
diathermy in patients with implanted devices, as it may
lead to thermal injury to tissue, or device damage with
reprogramming of its settings. In Harmonic scalpels,
electrical energy from the generator unit is converted
into mechanical energy by the transducer to create
high frequency vibrations which cut and coagulate
tissue. Thus, electrical current will not travel through
the patients body.
Meyring K et al described a series of patients with
DBS undergoing lung lobectomy. Similarly to our case,
the DBS devices were switched off before anaesthesia.
In these cases, bipolar cautery was used for skin
incision. Harmonic scalpel was used in hilar structures
and lymph node dissection in one case and argon
plasma coagulation for pleural haemostasis for the
other two. In our case, Harmonic scalpel alone was
utilized throughout the surgery.
Surgical Management of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in Patient
with Deep Brain Stimulator A Challenge for Safe Haemostasis
M Abbas, R Weedle, A Soo
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Galway University Hospital
Introduction
Achieving haemostasis using electrocautery is an
integral part of any surgical procedure, including
thoracic surgery. Deep brain stimulators (DBS) use
electrical current to reduce symptoms of
movement disorders. Electrocautery may damage
the device or surrounding tissues such as chest wall
or brain, presenting a challenge for haemostasis
during surgery.
Ultrasonic surgical instruments, such as Harmonic
scalpel, ensure haemostasis via high frequency
vibrations around 55.5 KHz.
The Case
A73-year-old lady who had a left-sided DBS
implanted 9 months previously for treatment of
essential tremor, refractory to medical treatment.
The DBS was implanted by a specialist
neurosurgeon with good symptomatic response.
She subsequently developed a cough, and
investigation revealed early stage NSCLC.
She underwent left upper lobectomy. DBS
precluded the use of electrocautery during
surgical management. Her device was switched
off by her neurologist 16 hours preoperatively.
A left posterolateral thoracotomy, tissue
dissection, left upper lobectomy, mediastinal
lymph node dissection, and thoracotomy closure
were entirely performed using Harmonic scalpel.
Total blood loss was negligible. Electrocautery
was avoided for the whole procedure.
The DBS was reactivated postoperatively, and
functioned normally, with no complications for
the patient. The patient had an uneventful
recovery and was reviewed by the neurologist
before discharge.
Conclusion
Harmonic scalpel can be safely used as an alternative
for diathermy in patients with DBS undergoing thoracic
surgery, with no complications. More studies are
necessary to develop guidelines to assist in
management of this growing group of patients.
Figure 1: Pre-discharge chest x-ray of
patient showing deep brain stimulator
in situ
Figure 2: Harmonic Scalpel
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
Movement disorders such as Parkinson's disease are increasingly treated with deep brain stimulators. Being implanted in a subcutaneous pocket in the chest region, thoracic surgical procedures can interfere with such devices, as they are sensible to external electromagnetic forces. Monopolar electrocautery can lead to dysfunction of the device or damage of the brain tissue caused by heat. We report a series of 3 patients with deep brain stimulators who underwent thoracic surgery. By turning off the deep brain stimulators before surgery and avoiding the use of monopolar cautery, electromagnetic interactions were avoided in all patients.
Article
Full-text available
Deep brain stimulation is an accepted treatment for advanced Parkinson disease (PD), although there are few randomized trials comparing treatments, and most studies exclude older patients. To compare 6-month outcomes for patients with PD who received deep brain stimulation or best medical therapy. Randomized controlled trial of patients who received either deep brain stimulation or best medical therapy, stratified by study site and patient age (< 70 years vs > or = 70 years) at 7 Veterans Affairs and 6 university hospitals between May 2002 and October 2005. A total of 255 patients with PD (Hoehn and Yahr stage > or = 2 while not taking medications) were enrolled; 25% were aged 70 years or older. The final 6-month follow-up visit occurred in May 2006. Bilateral deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (n = 60) or globus pallidus (n = 61). Patients receiving best medical therapy (n = 134) were actively managed by movement disorder neurologists. The primary outcome was time spent in the "on" state (good motor control with unimpeded motor function) without troubling dyskinesia, using motor diaries. Other outcomes included motor function, quality of life, neurocognitive function, and adverse events. Patients who received deep brain stimulation gained a mean of 4.6 h/d of on time without troubling dyskinesia compared with 0 h/d for patients who received best medical therapy (between group mean difference, 4.5 h/d [95% CI, 3.7-5.4 h/d]; P < .001). Motor function improved significantly (P < .001) with deep brain stimulation vs best medical therapy, such that 71% of deep brain stimulation patients and 32% of best medical therapy patients experienced clinically meaningful motor function improvements (> or = 5 points). Compared with the best medical therapy group, the deep brain stimulation group experienced significant improvements in the summary measure of quality of life and on 7 of 8 PD quality-of-life scores (P < .001). Neurocognitive testing revealed small decrements in some areas of information processing for patients receiving deep brain stimulation vs best medical therapy. At least 1 serious adverse event occurred in 49 deep brain stimulation patients and 15 best medical therapy patients (P < .001), including 39 adverse events related to the surgical procedure and 1 death secondary to cerebral hemorrhage. In this randomized controlled trial of patients with advanced PD, deep brain stimulation was more effective than best medical therapy in improving on time without troubling dyskinesias, motor function, and quality of life at 6 months, but was associated with an increased risk of serious adverse events. clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00056563.
Article
Deep brain stimulation has become an increasingly common treatment for Parkinson's disease and other movement disorders. Consequently, it is important to understand the concepts of appropriate patient selection, the implantation process, and the various drugs and techniques that can be used to facilitate this treatment. Currently, none of the anaesthetic techniques for neurostimulator implantation has proven to be superior to others, although awake or sedation techniques are popular as they facilitate intraoperative neurological testing. However, even with meticulous anaesthetic care, perioperative complications such as hypertension and seizures do occasionally occur and close monitoring is required. Anaesthesia in patients with an implanted neurostimulator requires special considerations because of possible interference between neurostimulators and other devices. We have reviewed the current knowledge of anaesthetic techniques and perioperative complications of neurostimulator insertion. Anaesthetic considerations in patients with an implanted neurostimulator are also discussed.
Article
Deep brain stimulators are implantable devices with electrical activity used to treat certain movement disorders such as essential tremor and Parkinson's disease. Similar to implantable cardiac devices, use of electrosurgery on patients with these devices may produce adverse effects. We describe the effects of electrosurgery on a patient with essential tremor and an implantable deep brain stimulator who required Mohs micrographic surgery to excise a basal cell carcinoma. The patient experienced immediate lancinating "electrical shock" using electrosurgery in the monopolar mode. The patient experienced no discomfort when a bipolar electrosurgical device was used or when his deep brain stimulator was "turned off." Appropriate positioning of the dispersive plate also reduced adverse effects. Dermatologic surgeons should be aware of patients with devices implanted in the CNS with electrical activity and proceed with caution when using electrosurgery. Different approaches can be utilized to help reduce adverse effects.
Article
Pulse-modulated radiofrequency diathermy treatment to the maxilla produced permanent diencephalic and brainstem lesions and a vegetative state in a patient with PD with implanted subthalamic electrodes for deep brain stimulation.