Content uploaded by Pradeep Shrestha
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Pradeep Shrestha on Apr 13, 2021
Content may be subject to copyright.
789
Free Full Text Articles are Available at www.jnma.com.np
JNMA I VOL 58 I ISSUE 230 I OCTOBER 2020
Study of Oxygen Saturation by Pulse Oximetry and Arterial Blood Gas
in ICU Patients: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study
Nabin Kumar Rauniyar,1 Shyam Pujari,1 Pradeep Shrestha2
1Department of Internal Medicine, Nepal Police Hospital, Nepal, 2Department of Internal Medicine, Dhaulagiri Zonal
Hospital, Baglung, Nepal.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Pulse oximetery is expected to be an indirect estimation of arterial oxygen saturation.
However, there often are gaps between SpO2 and SaO2. This study aims to study on arterial oxygen
saturation measured by pulse oximetry and arterial blood gas among patients admitted in intensive
care unit.
Methods: It was a hospital-based descriptive cross-sectional study in which 101 patients meeting
inclusion criteria were studied. SpO2 and SaO2 were measured simultaneously. Mean±SD of SpO2
and SaO2 with accuracy, sensitivity and specicity were measured.
Results: According to SpO2 values, out of 101 patients, 26 (25.7%) were hypoxemic and 75 (74.25%)
were non–hypoxemic. The mean±SD of SaO2 and SpO2 were 93.22±7.84% and 92.85±6.33%
respectively. In 21 patients with SpO2<90%, the mean±SD SaO2 and SpO2 were 91.63±4.92 and
87.42±2.29 respectively. In 5 patients with SpO2 < 80%, the mean ± SD of SaO2 and SpO2 were: 63.40
± 3.43 and 71.80±4.28, respectively. In non–hypoxemic group based on SpO2 values, the mean±SD of
SpO2 and SaO2 were 95.773±2.19% and 95.654±3.01%, respectively. The agreement rate of SpO2 and
SaO2 was 83.2%, and sensitivity and specicity of PO were 84.6% and 83%, respectively.
Conclusions: Pulse Oximetry has high accuracy in estimating oxygen saturation with sp02>90%
and can be used instead of arterial blood gas.
________________________________________________________________________________________
Keywords: arterial blood oxygen saturation; arterial blood gases; hypoxemia; pulse oximetry.
________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________
Correspondence: Dr. Nabin Kumar Rauniyar, Department
of Internal Medicine, Nepal Police Hospital, Maharajgunj,
Kathmandu, Nepal. Email: nabinrauniyar1@gmail.com, Phone:
+977- 9851281585.
INTRODUCTION
Pulse oximetry (PO) is a useful tool for clinical and
investigational purposes for indirect measurements of
oxygen saturation.1-3 Measurement of oxygen saturation
with SpO2 can be used for evaluation and control of
hypoxemia. As PO is a non–invasive device, it can be
used instead of ABG. Some studies suggest that this
method does not exactly reect the values of ABGs.2,5-7.
The majority of patients admitted in ICU show gaps
between arterial oxygen saturation measured by ABG
and PO. Many studies suggest that pulse oximeters
are inaccurate at low saturations8-12, because as SaO2
decreases, bias will be increased, while precision (the
standard deviation of the differences) will be decreased,
with SpO2 increasingly overestimating SaO2.13
This study aims to study on arterial oxygen saturation
measured by pulse oximetry and arterial blood gas
among patients admitted in intensive care unit.
ORIGINAL ARTICLE J Nepal Med Assoc 2020;58(230):789-93
CC
BY
doi: 10.31729/jnma.5536
CC
BY
JNMA I VOL 58 I ISSUE 230 I OCTOBER 2020
790
Free Full Text Articles are Available at www.jnma.com.np
METHODS
A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted in
ICU of Bir Hospital, Mahaboudha, Kathmandu from
Oct 2017 to Oct 2018 after taking ethical clearance
from Institutional Review Board, National Academy
of Medical Sciences (Ref: 1054). History, clinical
examination, chest X-ray ndings, pulse oximetry and
ABG were reviewed. Patients admitted in ICU with
or without hypoxemia during the study period were
included in the study after obtaining informed consent.
Inclusion Criteria
a. Patient older than 18 years admitted in ICU.
b. Arterial blood gas analysis and pulse oximetry should
be taken simultaneously
c. Informed consent is given by the patient (and from
the relatives of the patients who were unconscious).
Exclusion criteria
a. Data were excluded when SaO2 was less than 60% or
PaO2 were higher than 100mmHg.
b. Patients under 18 years of age.
c. Venous blood sample
Convenient sampling was done and the sample size
was calculated using the formula,
N = Z2 x (p x q) /d2
= 1.962 x (94x6)/52
= 86.6
where, Z = 1.96 ( reliability coefcient at 95 %
condence level)
p = 94 (prevelance of study)
q = 100-p
d = maximum tolerable error = 5
Z= 1.96 at 95 % CI
The calculated minimum sample size was 86.6,
however, the total sample size taken was 101. Data
were collected using a structured proforma covering the
relevant details.
ABG and pulse oximetry were taken simultaneously in
all ICU admitted patients Arterial blood sample (about
0.5ml) was obtained from the radial artery following
conrmation of collateral vessel ow by Allen’s test
or modied Allen test. These are bedside tests that
demonstrate collateral ow through the supercial
palmar arch.
Before taking the sample, the syringe lumen was
heparinized (0.1 ccs). Air bubbles, if present, was
immediately expelled from the sample; the sample
was sealed in an iced container and taken to blood
gas analyzer (ABL 80Flex Automatic Blood Gases,
Copenhagen, Denmark).
SpO2 was obtained using a pulse oximeter (Fingertip,
China). The nger probe for the unit was placed on
the index nger of the opposite arm from which the
arterial sample had been taken. Spo2 was measured
twice at 0 minutes and 2 minutes, then the average of
two was taken. In this study, ABG values were taken
as reference values. According to SpO2, the studied
patients were divided into three groups: SpO2 <80%,
90%>SpO2≥80% and SpO2 ≥ 90%. Hypoxemia was
considered as SpO2 or SaO2 <90% or partial pressure
of oxygen (Pa02) < 60mm Hg by ABG.
The data were collected and entered in MS-Excel 2007
and analyzed using the IBM Statistical Package for
Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20 software. Sensitivity,
specicity and accuracy of PO were measured and
calculated.
RESULTS
A total of 101 patients were enrolled in this study (56
Male, 45 Female). Twenty six (25.7%) were hypoxemic
and 75 (74.25%) were non–hypoxemic according to PO
and based on ABG results, SaO2 values were less than
90% in 13 (12.9%) patients, and the values were equal
or more than 90% in 88 (87.1%) patients. The mean ±
SD oxygen saturation values (SaO2) measured by ABG
analyzer system were greater than those measured
by pulse oximetry (SpO2): (SaO2=93.22±7.84%,
SpO2=92.85±6.33%).
There were differences between pulse oximetry (SpO2)
and ABG values (SaO2) in the limit of SpO2<80% and
90% >SpO2 ≥80% (Table 1).
Table 1. Statistical indexes of oxygen saturation
values measured by ABG and PO for arterial oxygen
saturation.
Statistical Analysis Oxygen saturation
(mean ± SD)
Group Methods
Overall
(n=101)
ABG
Pulse Oximetry
93.22±7.84%
92.85±6.33%
SpO2 < 80%
( n=5)
ABG
Pulse Oximetry
63.40 ± 3.43511
71.80 ± 4.280
90% > SpO2
≥80%
( n = 21)
ABG
Pulse Oximetry
91.63±4.92
87.42±2.293
SpO2 ≥ 90%
( n = 75)
ABG
Pulse Oximetry
95.6547±3.013
95.77± 2.192
In 21 hypoxemic patients (SpO2<90%), the mean ± SD
SaO2 and SpO2 were: 91.63±4.92 and 87.42±2.29.
In 5 of the hypoxemic patients (SpO2 < 80%), the
mean ± SD of SaO2 and SpO2 were: 63.40 ± 3.43
Rauniyar et al. Study of Oxygen Saturation by Pulse Oximetry and Arterial Blood Gas in ICU Patients: A...
791
Free Full Text Articles are Available at www.jnma.com.np
JNMA I VOL 58 I ISSUE 230 I OCTOBER 2020
and 71.80 ± 4.28, respectively. As patients were
dened non–hypoxemic based on SpO2 values, the
mean ± SD of SpO2 and SaO2 were 95.773 ±2.19%,
95.654±3.01%, respectively. The sensitivity and
specicity of pulse oximetry were 84.6 % and 83 %,
respectively (Table 2).
Table 2. Sensitivity, specicity and accuracy of the
Pulse oxymetry.
Arterial Blood Gas (ABG)
Hypoxic (<90) Non-hypoxic
(90 or more)
Pulse
oxymetry
Hypoxic
(<90)
11 (84.6%) 15 (17%)
Non-
hypoxic
(90 or
more)
2 (15.4%) 73 (83%)
DISCUSSION
In acute illness, patients with SpO2 ≥ 90%, PO has
high accuracy in estimating SaO2 and may be used
instead of ABG. The study suggests that in patients
with SpO2 < 90%, however, the exact estimation
of SaO2 and the evaluation of oxygenation by pulse
oximeter is not a good substitution for ABG analyzer.
Regarding the comparison between oxygen saturation
measured by pulse oximetry and ABG, many studies
have been conducted related to accuracy.
In a recent meta-analysis of the measurement of SaO2
by pulse oximetry, Jensen et al. concluded that, from
the 74 studies (1976 to 1994 ), pulse oximeters were
accurate within 2% in the range of 70-100% SaO2.14
In the study of Carter et al., the performance of pulse
oximetry deteriorated below a SpO2 of 75%.15 In
the study of Chiappini et al., a signicant difference
was found between SpO2 and SaO2 values.16 SpO2
values were lower than SaO2 (90.58±5.45% vs.
92.14±5.79%) and a lack of accuracy of the pulse
oximeter was found, but only for SpO2 values below
82%.
Study of Kenneth P Levin et al conducted in 2001,
shows that increasing the assessment of arterial
oxygenation among patients with community-acquired
pneumonia(CAP) is likely to increase the detection of
arterial hypoxemia, particularly among outpatients.
However, ABG should be considered for patients with
underlying cardiopulmonary disease, for those for
whom ventilatory failure is of clinical concern, and if
other reported sources of error for PO are present.17
Similarly, another study of Ebrahim Razi, Hossein
Akbari in 2006 done for COPD patients included 152
patients.18 The accuracy of pulse oximetry was 90.8%,
sensitivity was 93.3% and specicity was 89.1%. The
study reported that in pulmonary diseases with SpO2
≥ 80%, PO has high accuracy in estimating SaO2,
which is contradictory to our study where accuracy is
estimated when Spo2 > 90%. In patients with SpO2
< 80%, however, the result is similar to our study and
concluded that the evaluation of oxygenation by pulse
oximeter is not a good substitution for ABG analyzer.
In a study of Kanai R., Moriyama K. et al done in large
scale including 20717 arterial blood gas samples from
ICU patients, SpO2 tended to show a higher value
than SaO2 and suggest to keep SpO2 above 92% to
avoid hypoxemia in the ICU to decrease morbidity and
mortality.19
Webb et al. reported that pulse oximetry is poorly
calibrated at low saturations and generally less accurate
and less precise than at normal saturations.20 In the
study of Webb et al., nearly 30% of values reviewed
were erroneous by more than 5% at saturation of less
than 80%.
Many studies suggest that pulse oximeters are
inaccurate at low saturations 8-12, because as SaO2
decreases, bias will be increased, while precision
(the standard deviation of the differences) will be
decreased, with SpO2 increasingly overestimating
SaO2. 13 Many explanations have been proposed for
the limited performance of pulse oximeters at low
saturations. One is the slight variations in the output
wavelength of the light-emitting diodes which generate
proportionally larger errors at low saturations.21,22
Another is the generation of proportionally larger errors
in the measurement of transmitted red light versus of
infra-red light at low saturations because of the large
extinction coefcient of reduced haemoglobin.23
In the current study when oxygenation saturation was
more than 90%, there was good correlation coefcient
between the two methods of measurements (in non–
hypoxemic groups, the correlation coefcient was
0.493 and P<0.001). The study revealed that only two
patients (15.4%) out of all who were considered non-
hypoxemic according to PO were considered hypoxemic
in terms of ABG values. The obtained agreement rate
was 83.2%. Given the critical point of SpO2≥90%,
about 83.2% of cases correlated this regard. Thus,
although patients were considered as hypoxemic or
non–hypoxemic according to pulse oximetry or ABG
results, because of slight changes among the results
of the two methods and also a wide variety of cases,
correlation coefcient had shown good correlation
between two methods, especially in Spo2 ≥90% with
P<0.001.
Rauniyar et al. Study of Oxygen Saturation by Pulse Oximetry and Arterial Blood Gas in ICU Patients: A...
JNMA I VOL 58 I ISSUE 230 I OCTOBER 2020
792
Free Full Text Articles are Available at www.jnma.com.np
From the above discussion, we can conclude that PO
is easily available, painless, non-invasive continuous
monitoring and cheap method that can be considered
an appropriate substitute for ABG, especially in SpO2
≥90% with an accuracy of about 83.2%. However
in conditions with low oxygen saturation (SpO2
<90%) and in critical status, PO is a poor predictor of
hypoxemia or not a good alternative to estimate arterial
oxygen saturation. There are several limitations of the
study as the sample size is small and the accuracy rate
is only 83.2%. Futher studies are required for accuracy
and effectiveness of the PO in a large sample. In
addition, though PO measures arterial oxygenation, it
does not assess ventilation. Therefore, it needs to be
aided with ABG analysis when alveolar hypoventilation
is suspected clinically.
CONCLUSIONS
Pulse Oximetry has high accuracy in estimating oxygen
saturation with sp02>90% and can be used instead of
arterial blood gas. The study suggests that in patients
with SpO2 <90%, however, the exact estimation
of SaO2 and the evaluation of hypoxemia by pulse
oximeter is not a good alternative for ABG analyzer.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We would like to acknowledge the help from Ravi
Bhasker, Department of Community Medicine, National
Medical College, Birgunj, Nepal, for study designing and
statistical analysis.
Conict of Interest: None.
REFERENCES
4. Escourrou PJ, Delaperche MF, Visseaux A. Reliability of
pulse oximetry during exercise in pulmonary patients.
Chest. 1990 Mar;97(3):635-8. [PubMed | Full Text | DOI]
5. Thrush D, Hodges MR. Accuracy of pulse oximetry during
hypoxemia. South Med J. 1994 Apr;87(4):518-21. [PubMed |
Full Text | DOI]
6. Severinghaus JW, Kelleher JF. Recent developments in pulse
oximetry. Anesthesiology. 1992 Jun;76(6):1018-38. [PubMed
| Full Text | DOI]
7. Wukitsch MW, Petterson MT, Tobler DR, Pologe JA. Pulse
oximetry: analysis of theory, technology, and practice. J Clin
Monit. 1988 Oct;4(4):290-301. [PubMed | Full Text | DOI]
8. Iyriboz Y, Powers S, Morrow J, Ayers D, Landry G. Accuracy
of pulse oximeters in estimating heart rate at rest and during
exercise. Br J Sports Med. 1991 Sep;25(3):162-4. [PubMed |
Full Text | DOI]
9. Barker SJ, Tremper KK. Pulse oximetry: applications and
limitations. Int Anesthesiol Clin. 1987 Fall;25(3):155-75.
[PubMed | Full Text | DOI]
10. Blaisdell CJ, Goodman S, Clark K, Casella JF, Loughlin GM.
Pulse oximetry is a poor predictor of hypoxemia in stable
children with sickle cell disease. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med.
2000 Sep;154(9):900-3. [PubMed | Full Text | DOI]
11. Lebecque P, Shango P, Stijns M, Vliers A, Coates AL. Pulse
oximetry versus measured arterial oxygen saturation: a
comparison of the Nellcor N100 and the Biox III. Pediatr
Pulmonol. 1991;10(2):132-5. [PubMed | Full Text | DOI]
12. Fanconi S. Reliability of pulse oximetry in hypoxic infants. J
Pediatr. 1988 Mar;112(3):424-7. [PubMed | Full Text | DOI]
13. Fanconi S. Pulse oximetry and transcutaneous oxygen
tension for detection of hypoxemia in critically ill infants
and children. Adv Exp Med Biol. 1987;220:159-64. [PubMed
| Full Text | DOI]
14. Schmitt HJ, Schuetz WH, Proeschel PA, Jaklin C. Accuracy
of pulse oximetry in children with cyanotic congenital heart
disease. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 1993 Feb;7(1):61-5.
[PubMed | Full Text | DOI]
15. Severinghaus JW, Naifeh KH, Koh SO. Errors in 14 pulse
oximeters during profound hypoxia. J Clin Monit. 1989
Apr;5(2):72-81. [PubMed | Full Text | DOI]
16. Nickerson BG, Sarkisian C, Tremper K. Bias and precision
of pulse oximeters and arterial oximeters. Chest. 1988
Mar;93(3):515-7. [PubMed | Full Text | DOI]
17. Jensen LA, Onyskiw JE, Prasad NG. Meta-analysis of arterial
oxygen saturation monitoring by pulse oximetry in adults.
Heart Lung. 1998 Nov-Dec;27(6):387-408. [PubMed | Full
Text | DOI]
18. Carter BG, Carlin JB, Tibballs J, Mead H, Hochmann M,
Osborne A. Accuracy of two pulse oximeters at low arterial
hemoglobin-oxygen saturation. Crit Care Med. 1998
Jun;26(6):1128-33. [PubMed | Full Text | DOI]
19. Chiappini F, Fuso L, Pistelli R. Accuracy of a pulse oximeter
in the measurement of the oxyhaemoglobin saturation. Eur
Respir J. 1998 Mar;11(3):716-9. [PubMed | Full Text]
20. Levin KP, Hanusa BH, Rotondi A, Singer DE, Coley CM,
Marrie TJ, Kapoor WN, Fine MJ. Arterial blood gas and
pulse oximetry in initial management of patients with
community-acquired pneumonia. J Gen Intern Med. 2001
Sep;16(9):590-8. [PubMed | Full Text | DOI]
21. Razi E, Akbari H. A comparison of arterial oxygen saturation
measured both by pulse oximeter and arterial blood gas
analyzer in hypoxemic and non-hypoxemic pulmonary
diseases. Turkish Respiratory Journal. 2006 Aug;7(2):43-7.
[Full Text]
22. Kanai R, Moriyama K, Kohyama T, Yorozu T. Reliability of
Oxygen Saturation by Pulse Oximeter to Detect Hypoxemia
of Patients in the Intensive Care Unit Anesth Analg. 2012
Rauniyar et al. Study of Oxygen Saturation by Pulse Oximetry and Arterial Blood Gas in ICU Patients: A...
793
Free Full Text Articles are Available at www.jnma.com.np
JNMA I VOL 58 I ISSUE 230 I OCTOBER 2020
May;113:159. [Full Text]
23. Webb RK, Ralston AC, Runciman WB. Potential errors in
pulse oximetry. II. Effects of changes in saturation and signal
quality. Anaesthesia. 1991 Mar;46(3):207-12. [PubMed | Full
Text | DOI]
24. Welch JP, DeCesare R, Hess D. Pulse oximetry:
instrumentation and clinical applications. Respir Care. 1990
Jun;35(6):584-97. [Full Text]
25. Wahr JA, Tremper KK. Noninvasive oxygen monitoring
techniques. Crit Care Clin. 1995 Jan;11(1):199-217. [PubMed]
26. Reynolds KJ, Moyle JT, Sykes MK, Hahn CE. Response of 10
pulse oximeters to an in vitro test system. Br J Anaesth. 1992
Apr;68(4):365-9. [PubMed | Full Text | DOI]
© The Author(s) 2018.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are
included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative
Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Rauniyar et al. Study of Oxygen Saturation by Pulse Oximetry and Arterial Blood Gas in ICU Patients: A...