ArticlePDF AvailableLiterature Review

Neuromuscular Function of the Knee Joint Following Knee Injuries: Does It Ever Get Back to Normal? A Systematic Review with Meta-Analyses

Authors:

Abstract

Background Neuromuscular deficits are common following knee injuries and may contribute to early-onset post-traumatic osteoarthritis, likely mediated through quadriceps dysfunction. Objective To identify how peri-articular neuromuscular function changes over time after knee injury and surgery. Design Systematic review with meta-analyses. Data Sources PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, CENTRAL (Trials). Eligibility Criteria for Selecting Studies Moderate and high-quality studies comparing neuromuscular function of muscles crossing the knee joint between a knee-injured population (ligamentous, meniscal, osteochondral lesions) and healthy controls. Outcomes included normalized isokinetic strength, muscle size, voluntary activation, cortical and spinal-reflex excitability, and other torque related outcomes. Results A total of 46 studies of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and five of meniscal injury were included. For ACL injury, strength and voluntary activation deficits were evident (moderate to strong evidence). Cortical excitability was not affected at < 6 months (moderate evidence) but decreased at 24+ months (moderate evidence). Spinal-reflex excitability did not change at < 6 months (moderate evidence) but increased at 24+ months (strong evidence). We also found deficits in torque variability, rate of torque development, and electromechanical delay (very limited to moderate evidence). For meniscus injury, strength deficits were evident only in the short-term. No studies reported gastrocnemius, soleus or popliteus muscle outcomes for either injury. No studies were found for other ligamentous or chondral injuries. Conclusions Neuromuscular deficits persist for years post-injury/surgery, though the majority of evidence is from ACL injured populations. Muscle strength deficits are accompanied by neural alterations and changes in control and timing of muscle force, but more studies are needed to fill the evidence gaps we have identified. Better characterisation and therapeutic strategies addressing these deficits could improve rehabilitation outcomes, and potentially prevent PTOA. Trial Registration Number PROSPERO CRD42019141850.
Vol.:(0123456789)
Sports Medicine (2021) 51:321–338
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-020-01386-6
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
Neuromuscular Function oftheKnee Joint Following Knee
Injuries: Does It Ever Get Back toNormal? ASystematic Review
withMeta‑Analyses
BeyzaTayfur1 · ChedsadaCharuphongsa1· DylanMorrissey1,2· StuartCharlesMiller1
Published online: 27 November 2020
© The Author(s) 2020
Abstract
Background Neuromuscular deficits are common following knee injuries and may contribute to early-onset post-traumatic
osteoarthritis, likely mediated through quadriceps dysfunction.
Objective To identify how peri-articular neuromuscular function changes over time after knee injury and surgery.
Design Systematic review with meta-analyses.
Data Sources PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, CENTRAL (Trials).
Eligibility Criteria for Selecting Studies Moderate and high-quality studies comparing neuromuscular function of muscles
crossing the knee joint between a knee-injured population (ligamentous, meniscal, osteochondral lesions) and healthy
controls. Outcomes included normalized isokinetic strength, muscle size, voluntary activation, cortical and spinal-reflex
excitability, and other torque related outcomes.
Results A total of 46 studies of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and five of meniscal injury were included. For ACL injury,
strength and voluntary activation deficits were evident (moderate to strong evidence). Cortical excitability was not affected
at < 6months (moderate evidence) but decreased at 24+ months (moderate evidence). Spinal-reflex excitability did not
change at < 6months (moderate evidence) but increased at 24+ months (strong evidence). We also found deficits in torque
variability, rate of torque development, and electromechanical delay (very limited to moderate evidence). For meniscus
injury, strength deficits were evident only in the short-term. No studies reported gastrocnemius, soleus or popliteus muscle
outcomes for either injury. No studies were found for other ligamentous or chondral injuries.
Conclusions Neuromuscular deficits persist for years post-injury/surgery, though the majority of evidence is from ACL
injured populations. Muscle strength deficits are accompanied by neural alterations and changes in control and timing of
muscle force, but more studies are needed to fill the evidence gaps we have identified. Better characterisation and therapeutic
strategies addressing these deficits could improve rehabilitation outcomes, and potentially prevent PTOA.
Trial Registration Number PROSPERO CRD42019141850.
Electronic Supplementary Material The online version of this
article (https ://doi.org/10.1007/s4027 9-020-01386 -6) contains
supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
* Beyza Tayfur
b.tayfur@qmul.ac.uk
1 Sports andExercise Medicine, Queen Mary University
ofLondon, London, UK
2 Physiotherapy Department, Barts Health NHS Trust,
LondonE14DG, UK
Key Points
Neuromuscular alterations are evident in both short- and
long-term following knee injuries in strength, voluntary
activation, cortical and spinal excitability, and in timing
and control of muscle force production.
These alterations may be specific to ACL injury, since
we could not identify long-term alterations for meniscus
injury and no studies could be found for other ligamen-
tous or cartilage injuries to the knee, indicating a huge
evidence gap.
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
322 B.Tayfur et al.
1 Introduction
Knee injury is an independent risk factor for the develop-
ment of knee osteoarthritis (OA) in young adults [13]. The
prevalence of post-traumatic OA (PTOA) can be as high as
80% at 10+ years after the initial injury [4], with 4–6 times
higher odds compared to a non-injured knee [2]. PTOA
mainly affects a younger and more active population when
compared to non-traumatic OA, resulting in longer years
lived with disability [5], and surgical interventions 7–9years
earlier in life [6]. Therefore, prevention strategies for PTOA
development require particular attention.
Multiple anatomical, molecular, and physiological fac-
tors contribute to PTOA development [7]. Starting from the
energy absorption at the time of trauma, damage to joint
structures, including ligaments, meniscus, cartilage and sub-
chondral bone singly or in combination, creates an inflam-
matory cycle. This cycle of activation of cartilage-degrading
enzymes and chondrocyte apoptosis with joint instability
and biomechanical alterations may further contribute to the
degenerative process [7]. Throughout this process starting
from the initial injury to PTOA initiation, it is important to
identify modifiable risk factors so that targeted preventive
rehabilitation strategies can be applied.
Muscles around the knee joint play an important role in
the biomechanical alterations and joint instability after a
knee injury. Quadriceps muscle weakness is a modifiable
risk factor for non-traumatic OA [8] and PTOA [7]. Deficits
in quadriceps strength are also common following knee inju-
ries [9, 10], evident even at the end of the initial rehabilita-
tion period [11], and may persist for more than 20years [12].
Quadriceps weakness is also associated with gait alterations
following knee injuries [13], which are common in the long-
term [14], and hypothesised to be a contributor to PTOA
initiation by abnormal knee cartilage loading [15]. These
biomechanical alterations and joint instability may further
contribute to the degenerative cycle within the knee joint
[7]. Therefore, exercise therapy is at the core of PTOA pre-
vention strategies to theoretically delay or prevent PTOA
onset, through increasing muscle strength and improving
neuromuscular function [16, 17].
While longitudinal data are available for quadriceps
strength, less often considered is the overall neuromuscular
function of the knee joint. Neuromuscular alterations after
knee injury have been reported in case–control studies for
strength [18], voluntary activation [19], cortical and spi-
nal neural pathways [9, 10, 20], muscle structure [21] and
muscle activation patterns [22, 23] in muscles including the
quadriceps [9, 10, 1821], hamstrings [22, 23] and gastroc-
nemii [23]. Knee joint loading is also not only determined by
quadriceps femoris muscle but by the interaction of quadri-
ceps, hamstrings, gastrocnemius and soleus muscles [24].
The neuromuscular alterations in these muscles controlling
the knee joint may exacerbate the degenerative process after
a knee injury through muscle weakness and abnormal car-
tilage loading [15]. It is therefore important to comprehen-
sively understand neuromuscular alterations in all the mus-
cles controlling the knee joint. This would further facilitate
improved rehabilitation programs targeting these alterations.
Previous systematic reviews of this type of research typi-
cally considered isolated muscles, particular injuries, spe-
cific time-points or limited neuromuscular outcomes [19,
2528]. There is a need to consider the importance of all
injuries on all peri-articular knee muscles, the focus of this
review, to fully understand the consequences of injury and
possible links to PTOA. This review also aimed to identify
where the main gaps in the literature manifest, so that future
research and clinical recommendations can be optimally
informed.
Injuries to knee ligaments, meniscus or cartilage are sig-
nificantly associated with higher PTOA risk when compared
to unspecified injuries [13, 29]. Therefore, the injured
population should include ligament, meniscus and cartilage
injuries to the knee if the aim is to understand the asso-
ciation with PTOA development. There is also evidence of
bilateral neuromuscular changes following unilateral knee
injury [30, 31], suggesting a requirement for healthy control
groups instead of using the contralateral ‘healthy leg’ for an
unbiased evaluation of post-traumatic neuromuscular altera-
tions. Therefore, we aimed to determine how neuromuscular
function of the knee joint changes over time following knee
injuries involving ligament, meniscus or cartilage compared
to healthy controls.
2 Methods
This systematic review and meta-analysis complied with the
PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews
and Meta-Analyses) guidelines [32]. The study protocol was
registered on PROSPERO (International Prospective Register
of Systematic Reviews) (CRD42019141850, 25 July 2019).
2.1 Search Strategy
We conducted a comprehensive systematic search of the fol-
lowing electronic databases without date restrictions until Feb-
ruary 2020: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and
Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL).
The search terms included medical subject headings (MeSH)
terms and text words. We modified the search strategy for
each specific database with keywords and concepts remain-
ing identical. The main concept included (knee injury [anterior
cruciate ligament (ACL), posterior cruciate ligament (PCL),
medial collateral ligament (MCL), lateral collateral ligament
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
323
Neuromuscular Function Following Knee Injuries: Does It Ever Get Back to Normal?
(LCL), meniscus, cartilage, chondral] AND neuromuscular
[strength, reflex, activation, electromyography, size] AND
lower limb muscles [quadriceps, hamstring, gastrocnemius,
soleus, popliteus]). Search strategies for all databases can be
found in Electronic Supplementary Material Appendix S1.
Two reviewers (BT and CC) independently conducted the
searches, removed duplicates, screened all abstracts for eli-
gibility and retrieved full-text versions of the eligible articles.
Disagreements between reviewer’s judgements were resolved
with a third reviewer (SCM). We also searched the reference
lists of the included articles and of the systematic reviews for
additional studies.
2.2 Selection Criteria
Studies comparing neuromuscular function of the knee joint
in participants with a previous knee injury and/or knee sur-
gery (all ligamentous, meniscal, osteochondral lesions) to an
age- and sex-matched control group were eligible for inclu-
sion. Studies without a control group, comparing involved
limb to uninvolved limb of participants, were excluded, as
there is evidence of bilateral neuromuscular changes follow-
ing unilateral injury [30, 31]. Observational studies both with
cross-sectional or prospective designs and interventional stud-
ies were included. We only used the baseline data of interven-
tional studies. Only studies published in the English language
were included.
2.3 Outcome Measures
Studies had to report at least one of the following neuromus-
cular outcome measures as the main outcome to be included:
body-mass normalized muscle strength as measured by an
isokinetic dynamometer or fixed force transducer, torque
related outcomes such as rate of torque development, torque
variability or electromechanical delay, muscle size or vol-
ume, voluntary activation deficits as measured by central
activation ratio or twitch interpolation technique, spinal
reflex excitability, or corticomotor excitability as measured
by active motor threshold. We defined neuromuscular as
including muscle size or volume, spinal reflex excitability
and corticomotor excitability although we are aware that
others may define it as outcomes specifically related to the
force-generating capacity of the muscles.
2.4 Methodological Quality Assessment
Risk of bias of the included studies was assessed using a
modified version of the Downs and Black checklist [33,
34], a methodological quality assessment tool for both ran-
domised and non-randomised interventional studies with
high internal consistency and inter-rater reliability [33].
The modified version consists of 15 questions, excluding
the questions about randomisation and interventions from
the original version (Electronic Supplementary Material
Appendix S2). The highest score of the modified version is
16, and thresholds for low, moderate and high quality were
accepted as < 60% (≤ 9), 60–74% (10–11), and > 75% (≥ 12),
respectively, consistent with previous studies [14, 35]. We
excluded low-quality studies from this systematic review as
they may cause over- or under-estimation of effect sizes and
may distort results, therefore leading to incorrect conclu-
sions [36, 37]. Two independent reviewers (BT and CC)
assessed methodological quality and disagreements were
resolved by asking a third reviewer (SCM).
2.5 Data Extraction
Data regarding the study design, participant characteristics
(number of participants, age, sex, injury/surgery details,
time since injury/surgery) and outcome measures (meas-
ured muscle groups and outcome) were extracted by two
independent reviewers (BT and CC) in an Excel spreadsheet.
Disagreements were resolved by asking a third reviewer
(SCM). Group means and standard deviations were extracted
for the main outcome measures. Where the reported data
were insufficient, corresponding authors were contacted by
e-mail to request unreported data or additional details.
2.6 Data Analysis
We analysed data according to time since injury/surgery,
consistent with previous systematic reviews [14, 27], as fol-
lows: (1) less than 6months (< 6months); (2) 6months to
less than 12months (6–12months); (3) 12months to less
than 2years (1–2years); and (4) 2years and over (≥ 2years).
When pre-surgery data were reported in surgical treatment
papers, time since injury was used to determine the time
subgroup of pre-surgery data and time since surgery was
used for the post-surgery data.
Data were pooled for meta-analysis when there were
more than two studies reporting the same outcome measure,
using the Cochrane Review Manager software (Version 5.3.
Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, the Cochrane
Collaboration, 2014). Standardised mean differences (SMD;
Hedges’ adjusted g) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were
calculated for variables of interest as the difference between
the injured leg and healthy control leg. Heterogeneity of the
pooled data was analysed with I2 and was considered as no
heterogeneity (≤ 25%), low heterogeneity (> 25%), moder-
ate heterogeneity (> 50%), and high heterogeneity (> 75%)
[38]. We used fixed (for homogenous data, I2 ≤ 25%) or ran-
dom (for heterogeneous data, I2 > 25%) effects models for
each meta-analysis according to the statistical heterogeneity.
The magnitude of the pooled SMD was interpreted based on
Cohen’s criteria, where SMD 0.8 indicated large, 0.5–0.8
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
324 B.Tayfur et al.
moderate, and 0.2–0.5 small effect sizes [39]. Potential pub-
lication biases were also examined by funnel plots for meta-
analyses when 10 or more studies were included [37]. Level
of evidence was reported by the following criteria: strong
evidence (multiple high-quality studies that were statistically
homogenous); moderate evidence (multiple studies including
at least one high-quality study, or from multiple moderate-
quality studies that are statistically homogenous); limited
evidence (high-quality study or multiple moderate-quality
studies that are statistically heterogeneous); very limited evi-
dence (one moderate-quality) [40].
We also provided an evidence gap map, showing the level
of evidence of available literature with findings, and areas
that need further research. This aims to avoid research waste
in areas with strong evidence and guide future studies.
3 Results
3.1 Study Selection
The search strategy retrieved 22,496 papers after duplicate
removal (Fig.1). Following title and abstract screening, 374
articles were assessed in full-text and 137 studies were eli-
gible to undergo quality assessment.
Following quality assessment, 84 low-quality studies
were excluded, leaving 13 high-quality (HQ) and 38 mod-
erate-quality (MQ) studies for final inclusion. Details of
methodological quality assessment of included studies can
be found in Table1 and of excluded studies in Electronic
Supplementary Material Appendix S3.
Fig. 1 Flow diagram of the
study selection process
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
325
Neuromuscular Function Following Knee Injuries: Does It Ever Get Back to Normal?
Table 1 Methodological quality assessment of included studies based on a modified Downs and Black scale [33, 34]
Numbers in the top row are the item numbers in the original Downs and Black scale
H high quality, M moderate quality
Study 1 2 3 5 6 7 10 11 12 15 18 20 21 22 25 Total score Quality level
Almeida etal. [41] 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 11 M
Chung etal. [42] 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 13 H
Clagg etal. [43] 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 10 M
Engelen-van Melick etal. [44] 1 1 1 2 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 11 M
Freddolini etal. [45] 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 11 M
Garrison etal. [46] 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 10 M
Goetschius and Hart [47] 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 10 M
Goetschius etal. [48] 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 12 H
Hall etal. [49] 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 10 M
Harkey etal. [10] 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 12 H
Holsgaard-Larsen etal. [50] 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 13 H
Hsiao etal. [51] 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 11 M
Hsieh etal. [52] 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 10 M
Ilich etal. [53] 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 11 M
Johnson etal. [54] 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 10 M
Kaminska etal. [55] 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 10 M
Kellis etal. [56] 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 10 M
Kline etal. [57] 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 10 M
Krishnan and Williams [58] 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 11 M
Kuenze etal. [20] 1 1 1 2 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 12 H
Kuenze etal. [59] 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 13 H
Kvist etal. [60] 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 10 M
Larsen etal. [11] 1 1 1 2 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 11 M
Lepley etal. [61] 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 12 H
Lepley etal. [9] 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 12 H
Lepley etal. [62] 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 11 M
Maeda etal. [63] 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 11 M
Norte etal. [64] 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 11 M
Oeffinger etal. [65] 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 10 M
O’Malley etal. [66] 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 10 M
Pamukoff etal. [22] 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 11 M
Pamukoff etal. [67] 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 11 M
Reed-Jones and Vallis [68] 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 10 M
Ristanis etal. [69] 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 11 M
Roos etal. [70] 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 10 M
Scheurer etal. [71] 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 11 M
Sturnieks etal. [72] 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 11 M
Tengman etal. [12] 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 13 H
Thomas etal. [73] 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 11 M
Thorlund etal. [74] 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 13 H
Thorlund etal. [75] 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 12 H
Tourville etal. [76] 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 12 H
Tsarouhas etal. [77] 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 10 M
Vairo [78] 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 12 H
Vairo etal. [79] 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 11 M
Ward etal. [80] 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 11 M
Welling etal. [81] 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 10 M
Xergia etal. [82] 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 10 M
Zarzycki etal. [83] 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 10 M
Zult etal. [84] 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 11 M
Zwolski etal. [85] 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 11 M
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
326 B.Tayfur et al.
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
327
Neuromuscular Function Following Knee Injuries: Does It Ever Get Back to Normal?
3.2 Study Characteristics
The characteristics of the included studies and outcome
measures in each study can be found in Electronic Supple-
mentary Material Appendix S4. Overall, 46 studies included
patients with ACL injury and five studies included patients
with a meniscus injury. ACL studies included patients with
ACL deficient knees and ACL reconstruction patients with
different graft types (i.e. hamstring tendon graft (HT), patel-
lar tendon graft (PT), allograft), while all meniscus studies
included patients who had had a meniscectomy. ACL stud-
ies included a younger population (i.e. participants in their
20s) when compared to meniscus studies (i.e. participants
in their 40s) at the time of testing. We could not identify any
studies including patients with other ligamentous injuries to
the knee (i.e. PCL, MCL, and LCL) or cartilage/chondral
injuries as isolated injuries. In addition, studies generally
tested quadriceps and hamstring muscles, with no studies
reporting any outcomes pertaining to the gastrocnemius,
soleus or popliteus muscles.
3.3 Findings
Initial meta-analyses showed that injury type caused large
heterogeneity in the pooled data (i.e. opposing direction
of effects based on injury type). Therefore, we performed
our meta-analyses for studies of ACL and meniscus injury
separately. ACL-deficient and ACL-reconstructed cohorts
yielded similar results and did not cause heterogeneity;
therefore, they were pooled together in all meta-analyses.
The overall findings (direction, effect size and level of
evidence) of all meta-analyses for each outcome measure for
the given time period post-injury/surgery were summarised
in evidence gap maps (Fig.2 for ACL studies and Fig.3 for
meniscus studies). We broke down the first 6months in more
detail to show the evidence gap for the post-injury rehabili-
tation period. However, the data for the first 6months are
pooled together in the meta-analyses and the gap map is only
showing which months the data are derived from. We could
not identify any publication bias for eligible outcomes (i.e.
with more than ten studies in the meta-analysis; quadriceps
isometric strength) as measured by funnel plots. The forest
plots for quadriceps cortical excitability (Fig.4), quadri-
ceps spinal excitability (Fig.5), quadriceps voluntary activa-
tion (Fig.6), quadriceps slow concentric strength (Fig.7),
and hamstring slow concentric strength (Fig.8) for ACL
studies are presented. All other meta-analyses, forest plots
and funnel plots can be found in Electronic Supplementary
Material Appendix S5.
Our results showed consistent quadriceps and ham-
string strength deficits in both the short- and long-term
after ACL injury/surgery regardless of contraction type
(i.e. isometric, concentric or eccentric) with moderate and
strong evidence. These deficits were in parallel to voluntary
activation deficits in the short- (limited evidence) and long-
term (moderate evidence). Cortical and spinal excitability
were not affected in the short-term (moderate evidence);
however, they were altered in the long-term differently.
Cortical excitability decreased in the long-term (moderate
evidence), while spinal excitability increased (strong evi-
dence). Muscle size was reported in only one study, provid-
ing very limited evidence of no long-term change. Other
findings for the quadriceps femoris muscle for patients
with ACL injury/surgery included decreased rate of torque
development (limited to very limited evidence), decreased
(< 6months) then increased (6–12months) time to peak
torque (very limited evidence), increased torque variability
(very limited to moderate evidence), and unaffected elec-
tromechanical delay (very limited evidence). Additionally,
hamstring rate of torque development was not affected
(very limited evidence); however, electromechanical delay
increased in the long-term (limited to moderate evidence).
No change was seen in hamstring to quadriceps strength
ratios (very limited to moderate evidence).
Meniscus studies reported quadriceps and hamstring
strength deficits in the short-term (i.e. the first 6months after
injury/surgery), with quadriceps strength greater than controls
in the second year following injury/surgery, and similar to con-
trols in the long-term (i.e. 24+ months post injury/surgery),
albeit with limited or very limited evidence. Also, no change
was reported for quadriceps rate of torque development in the
long-term (limited evidence). Other neuromuscular outcomes
for meniscus injuries have not been investigated, leaving a
huge evidence gap for this voluminous patient population.
4 Discussion
Neuromuscular alterations around the knee joint are com-
monly reported following knee injuries but remain poorly
understood due to lack of adequate synthesis. The aim of this
systematic review was to identify changes in neuromuscular
function of the knee joint over time following knee injury/
surgery. Central and peripheral neural changes, morphologi-
cal muscle changes, and the clinical manifestations of altered
amplitude and timing of muscle activation and torque control
were included in the analysis to provide a comprehensive
overview. The timeline of these changes was also provided,
enabling the comparison of short- and long-term changes
after injury. Following ACL injuries, we found evidence for
Fig. 2 Findings and literature gap map for anterior cruciate ligament
studies. Colours represent the evidence level as by van Tulder etal.
[40] and directions represent injured group data when compared to
control, with the effect size. SMD standardised mean difference, ST
semitendinosus, BF biceps femoris, Ham:Quad hamstring:quadriceps
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
328 B.Tayfur et al.
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
329
Neuromuscular Function Following Knee Injuries: Does It Ever Get Back to Normal?
deficits in quadriceps and hamstring strength and quadriceps
voluntary activation, changes in cortical and spinal-reflex
neural pathways, deficits in force control and delays in rapid
force generation post-injury. Following meniscus injuries,
there was limited evidence for immediate strength deficits,
with these being restored long-term. Importantly, we iden-
tified major gaps in the evidence base, with no studies on
patients with cartilage injuries or ligamentous injuries other
than ACL, and no studies measuring gastrocnemius, soleus
or popliteus muscles for any of the injuries.
We consistently found quadriceps and hamstring strength
deficits in the ACL injured group both in the short- and
long-term. Increasing muscle strength is a primary focus of
rehabilitation guidelines [8688]; however, impairments are
evident despite these efforts. We also found that quadriceps
voluntary activation deficits are evident in the short-term and
do not recover in the long-term, providing a potential under-
lying neural mechanism of the quadriceps muscle weakness.
This neural dysfunction, often described as arthrogenic
muscle inhibition (AMI), is hypothesised to be a protective
mechanism to avoid further joint damage following knee
injuries [89]. However, it can be problematic if not restored
through rehabilitation, which would appear to be the case for
most of the participants measured in the included studies. We
could not control for the effects of rehabilitation received
post-injury and, therefore, cannot comment on whether AMI
persistence is mediated by the appropriateness of a particular
rehabilitation approach. A recent scoping review suggested
the use of cryotherapy and exercise in the management of
AMI, albeit partly based on experimentally induced AMI
in healthy knees [90]. It was also shown that after ACLR,
a 2-week rehabilitation programme including cryotherapy
application and physical exercise together improves AMI
more than cryotherapy or exercise alone [91]. Currently,
exercise treatment is accepted as common practice [8688],
and our meta-analysis of 14 studies (Fig.6) showed a lack
of activation deficit resolution in the long-term, suggest-
ing either the rehabilitation approaches undertaken by the
recruited participants in the included studies were insufficient
for resolving these deficits, adherence was sub-optimal or
the implementation of rehabilitation strategies were lacking.
Quadriceps muscle strength and voluntary activation
deficits were evident at the time return to sport commonly
occurs (i.e. 6–12months post-injury/surgery). Current
rehabilitation and return to sport guidelines recommend a
limb symmetry index threshold of 85–90% as a criterion
for strength recovery [8688, 92, 93]. However, the pres-
ence of neuromuscular alterations in the contralateral limb
Fig. 3 Findings and literature gap map for meniscus studies. Colours
represent the evidence level as by van Tulder etal. [40] and direc-
tions represent injured group data when compared to control, with the
effect size. SMD standardised mean difference, ST semitendinosus,
BF biceps femoris, Ham:Quad hamstring:quadriceps
Fig. 4 Forest plot of quadriceps active motor threshold from anterior cruciate ligament studies (increased active motor threshold meaning
decreased cortical excitability)
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
330 B.Tayfur et al.
Fig. 5 Forest plot of quadriceps Hoffman reflex (spinal excitability) from anterior cruciate ligament studies
Fig. 6 Forest plot of quadriceps voluntary activation from anterior cruciate ligament studies
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
331
Neuromuscular Function Following Knee Injuries: Does It Ever Get Back to Normal?
may cause overestimation of the injured-limb function [30,
31]. As such, use of symmetry-based strength outcomes
may reduce the ability to detect the strength deficits we
found in this systematic review, as we did not accept con-
tralateral knee as a control group. It may be that identifica-
tion of normative ranges from future research would better
inform return-to-play decisions.
We aimed to understand the nature of relevant central
and peripheral nervous system changes, including cortical
and spinal-reflexive pathways and found that these change
with time. We found no change in cortical excitability or in
spinal-reflex excitability in the short-term, with moderate
evidence. Short-term swelling and pain may be present
following knee injury/surgery, which does not affect corti-
cal excitability but decreases spinal-reflex excitability [94,
95]. Experimental joint effusion studies have also shown
that effusion decreases spinal-reflex excitability immedi-
ately after injection [96, 97]. Therefore, the observed acute
unaffected values of spinal-reflex excitability may be due
to both swelling and pain shadowing an increased spinal
reflex excitability in the short-term.
In the longer term, there is strong evidence of decreased
cortical excitability and increased spinal-reflex excit-
ability, suggesting that neuromodulation of quadriceps
activation adapts and changes through time after injury/
surgery. Decreased cortical excitability means that knee-
injured patients need more stimulation to yield sufficient
excitation in the primary motor cortex to generate mus-
cle activation [98]. While the clinical importance of these
changes in corticospinal and spinal-reflexive pathways is
not fully understood, recently it has been shown that cor-
ticospinal adaptations are correlated with muscle strength
and patient-reported knee function satisfaction following
ACLR [99]. It may be that the decrease in cortical excit-
ability is a protective long-term motor cortex adapta-
tion, while a compensatory reflex mechanism maintains
required muscle function when needed i.e. as a preparatory
mechanism to avoid a sudden collapse of the knee joint in
knee-injured patients [100]. It has been suggested that elec-
tromyographic biofeedback, transcranial magnetic stimula-
tion or transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation may be
beneficial in changing neural pathways to improve muscle
function [101]; however, empirical data are lacking to sup-
port these recommendations [90]. Further studies exploring
the effects of different interventions on neuromodulation
of quadriceps may be helpful to understand the clinical
usefulness of these, or novel, modalities and approaches.
Meniscus injury caused heterogeneity and showed better
long-term outcomes when compared to ACL studies. Altered
sensory function is reported following ACL injuries and has
been hypothesised to be the cause of alterations in motor
response [102]. Our results provide enough evidence to sup-
port that these changes in neuromuscular function are seen
in ACL-injured patients. However, it should be noted that
included studies were not investigating only isolated ACL
injury effects as many of the ACL-injured participants had
a concomitant meniscal injury. Due to a lack of reporting
in most studies, we could not pool or detail the differences
between isolated ACL injuries vs those with concomitant
meniscus damage. There is evidence that combined injuries
may increase PTOA development risk when compared to iso-
lated ACL injuries [103, 104]; however, from the neuromus-
cular perspective, no difference was reported in quadriceps
strength or voluntary activation for isolated ACL injuries vs
ACL injuries with concomitant meniscus injury [105]. There-
fore, neuromuscular alterations, mediated through quadriceps
weakness, may not be a critical pathway towards PTOA onset
in patients with isolated meniscus injuries, although the num-
ber of studies included in this study was insufficient to draw a
conclusion. We speculate that our findings show preliminary
data supporting injury-specific changes, and should stimulate
further investigation in injury-specific groups, perhaps group-
ing injuries into cogent sub-groups.
There is a decreased rate of quadriceps torque develop-
ment, albeit with limited evidence, which would limit rapid
force production in knee-injured populations [106, 107].
This may be due to an increased neural processing time or
a delay in the transmission of force within the muscle and/
or tendon [108, 109]. Rapid force production may be more
relevant to daily life activities and sports than maximum
strength, as most of these activities require a quick muscle
response [106, 107]. Rapid force production is also corre-
lated with self-reported knee function [52] and functional
performance [110], and may not recover even if maximum
peak torque is regained [107]. Therefore, the rate of torque
development may be an important descriptor of muscle func-
tion and further attention should be given to strengthen the
evidence and clarify the clinical relevance.
There is moderate evidence that quadriceps torque vari-
ability increases in the long-term, suggesting muscle control
impairments. Precise control of movement is essential for
optimal knee function, and insufficiency may cause altera-
tions in joint loading which may, in turn, lead to degenera-
tive cartilage changes [111]. Increased torque variability is
also evident in knee OA patients [112]; thus, we speculate
that motor control of the quadriceps muscle may be another
component of neuromuscular alterations in the long-term
following injury/surgery potentially contributing to the ini-
tiation of knee OA.
We found an important evidence gap in the literature
concerning the change of muscle morphology. Our search
yielded several studies on muscle size; however, they either
did not include a suitable control group or were of low qual-
ity; due to procedural and reporting issues rather than the
absence of valid measurement tools. Only one moderate
quality study, providing very limited evidence, found no
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
332 B.Tayfur et al.
difference in quadriceps muscle volume in the long-term.
However, it has been reported that both neural alterations
and muscle size can predict up to 60% of the variance in
muscle strength post-injury [113]. Muscle atrophy may
also explain strength deficits more than activation failure
[114]. Muscle size may have played an important role in
the strength deficits found in this systematic review; there-
fore, future studies should consider measuring muscle size
in knee-injured populations together with other neuromus-
cular outcomes.
Future research is needed to improve our understanding
of neuromuscular changes post-injury, with morphological
and neural alterations being measured in the same knee-
injured populations to understand their interactions and
effects on muscle strength, as well as muscle control and
the timing of movement generation. Another future step
should be understanding the impact of these neuromuscu-
lar alterations on movement patterns and joint loading, and
therefore their potential implications for PTOA onset. We
suggest including structural measurement of OA presence
in knee-injured populations to understand possible asso-
ciations of neuromuscular alterations with OA presence. A
clear association would further inform prospective studies to
determine whether these associations are causal.
Despite the increasing number of publications, and
accepted functional importance [115], we still do not have
strong evidence for key short- and long-term neuromuscu-
lar outcomes post-injury. The main research focus has been
on muscle strength, while the underlying neural mechanism
or morphological changes within the muscle have been of
less interest. More data are required to determine changes
in neuromuscular outcomes such as muscle size, timing of
Fig. 7 Forest plot of quadriceps slow concentric strength from anterior cruciate ligament studies
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
333
Neuromuscular Function Following Knee Injuries: Does It Ever Get Back to Normal?
muscle force production (i.e. rate of torque development,
electromechanical delay) and force control (i.e. torque vari-
ability). While the importance of measuring these factors in
the quadriceps muscle, especially post-ACL injury, is well-
established, changes in other muscles are often neglected
and should be further investigated.
Understanding the effects of different interventions may
help the development of better rehabilitation protocols that
may address the persistent neuromuscular impairments we
have shown in our systematic review. Future studies should
consider repeated measurement of neuromuscular function
to better understand its relation to changes in the patient’s
reported outcome measures and function. Further, such
data may yield useful findings about the prognostic value of
neuromuscular functional measures, which could help guide
both optimised rehabilitation and detection of osteoarthri-
tis development, while explaining individual differences
in responses. Therefore, the effects of novel rehabilitation
strategies that target neuromuscular alterations of the knee
joint in knee-injured populations should be investigated and
further implemented in rehabilitation protocols to improve
short- and long-term outcomes.
4.1 Limitations andConsiderations forFuture
Studies
Studies systematically lacked reporting of participant selec-
tion procedures, possibly resulting in a high level of partici-
pant selection bias (Table1). Included patients may be those
still having symptoms in the long-term, which may result in
an inflated alteration in the injured group. Ideally, recruit-
ment would be as close as possible to the index injury, with
long-term follow-up, so as to include those who cope well
Fig. 8 Forest plot of hamstring slow concentric strength from anterior cruciate ligament studies
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
334 B.Tayfur et al.
with injury as well as those who do not (i.e. a prospective
study design).
There is evidence of altered neuro-muscular function in
the lower limb being a risk factor for knee injury [116].
Therefore, we cannot assume that identified deficits are
purely the result of the injury as they may have been predis-
posing factors to injury in the first place.
Our search strategy included terms of all knee ligaments
(ACL, PCL, MCL, and LCL), meniscal injuries, cartilage
injuries and post-traumatic OA. However, our results only
showed studies on ACL-injured or meniscus-injured popula-
tions. We also found that knee injury was a source of hetero-
geneity in some of the outcomes; therefore, our findings may
be specific to ACL and meniscus injuries, and not applicable
to other injuries.
Another limitation was the heterogeneity of the included
patients in most studies. ACL-injured patients included in
the studies were mixed both in terms of concomitant injury,
‘copers’ vs ‘non-copers’, and graft type if surgery was per-
formed. Due to a lack of reporting and inadequate study
numbers, we could not draw any conclusions on the effects
of concomitant injuries or different surgeries (i.e. different
grafts), or comparison of ‘copers’ with ‘non-copers’.
Time since injury/surgery was used to define the short-
and long-term changes and for grouping the studies to pool
the data. Many of the included studies were not strict in
their time since injury/surgery criteria; therefore, the vari-
ability was high. I.e. a study could include participants
with a time since injury/surgery from 6 to 60months, with
a median of 24months. We used the mean or median time
to define the time groups; therefore, some variability in
the data may be expected due to the heterogeneity of time
since injury/surgery ranges of the included participants.
4.2 Clinical Implications
Persistent deficits found in our study may highlight pos-
sible failures in current post-injury treatment strategies.
We found that quadriceps strength, voluntary activation,
control and speed of muscle force generation and ham-
string strength are affected; therefore, targeting these
deficits may improve functional outcomes of knee-injury
rehabilitation. We acknowledge that measuring most of the
neuromuscular outcomes reported in this study may not
be feasible in clinical practice (i.e. cortical excitability,
spinal reflexes, torque-related outcomes, etc.); however,
research shows clinically applicable rehabilitation strate-
gies may improve these outcomes. For example, strength
training alone may not be sufficient to improve neuromus-
cular function of the knee joint, if movement quality and
speed of force production are being overlooked. It has been
suggested that a training protocol including controlled
muscle contractions with low-loads may improve muscle
force control [117], and heavy- or explosive-type resist-
ance training [106], or sensorimotor training focusing on
postural stabilization [118] may improve the rate of torque
development. For strength recovery, cryotherapy combined
with physical exercise has been shown to be effective in
reducing muscle inhibition in the short-term after injury
[90], while progressive strength training shows promising
results in the long-term [81]. Implementing these differ-
ent exercise types may improve neuromuscular function
of the knee joint, thus enhancing functional outcome post-
injury with repeated measures of neuromuscular function
potentially useful to determine intervention mechanisms
alongside clinical effectiveness. Such information could
inform more detailed rules for return to physical activity/
sport criteria, such as including motor control and qual-
ity of movement as well as maximum force capacity of
muscles. The subsequent effect on PTOA development or
re-injury rates would be key impact markers. It should be
noted that our findings are mainly based on ACL-injured
populations; therefore future studies may yield different
results for different injury types (i.e. injuries to the other
ligaments in the knee joint, meniscus or cartilage).
5 Conclusion
Our study enhances understanding of neuromuscular func-
tion of the knee joint following injuries and shows that neu-
ral and muscular alterations are common and persistent in
the short- and long-term after injury/surgery. Strength and
voluntary activation deficits are accompanied by changes in
cortical and spinal excitability for ACL patients in both the
short- and long-term (moderate to strong evidence), as well
as deficits in force control and rapid force production (very
limited to moderate evidence). Only strength was investi-
gated in patients with meniscus injuries and short-term defi-
cits demonstrated. Our study facilitates clinical recognition
of these deficits, and promotes future research to advance
rehabilitation strategies to target these alterations, ultimately
contributing to efforts made to optimise clinical outcomes
following knee injury and/or surgery and minimise PTOA
development or re-injury.
Declarations
Funding Postgraduate studies of Ms Beyza Tayfur were sponsored
by Turkish Ministry of National Education. The sponsors had no role
in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or
preparation of the manuscript.
Conflict of Interest Beyza Tayfur, Chedsada Charuphongsa, Dylan
Morrissey and Stuart Miller declare that they have no conflicts of in-
terest relevant to the content of this review.
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
335
Neuromuscular Function Following Knee Injuries: Does It Ever Get Back to Normal?
Ethics approval Not applicable.
Consent to participate Not applicable.
Consent for publication Not applicable.
Availability of data and material The data that support the findings of
this study are available on request from the corresponding author [BT].
Code availability Not applicable.
Author contributions Conception and design of the study: BT, DM and
SCM. Screening of the articles, data extraction, methodological quality
ratings and data analysis: BT and CC. First drafting of the manuscript:
BT. Critical revision of the manuscript: DM and SCM. All authors
approved the version to be published.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attri-
bution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adapta-
tion, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long
as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source,
provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes
were made. The images or other third party material in this article are
included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated
otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in
the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not
permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will
need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a
copy of this licence, visit http://creat iveco mmons .org/licen ses/by/4.0/.
References
1. Muthuri SG, McWilliams DF, Doherty M, Zhang W. History of
knee injuries and knee osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis of obser-
vational studies. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2011;19:1286–93.
2. Poulsen E, Goncalves GH, Bricca A, Roos EM, Thorlund JB,
Juhl CB. Knee osteoarthritis risk is increased 4–6 fold after knee
injury - a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med.
2019;53:1454–63.
3. Snoeker B, Turkiewicz A, Magnusson K, Frobell R, Yu D, Peat
G, etal. Risk of knee osteoarthritis after different types of knee
injuries in young adults: a population-based cohort study. Br J
Sport Med. 2020;54:725–30.
4. Lie MM, Risberg MA, Storheim K, Engebretsen L, Øiestad BE.
What’s the rate of knee osteoarthritis 10 years after anterior cru-
ciate ligament injury? An updated systematic review. Br J Sports
Med. 2019;53:1162–7.
5. Carbone A, Rodeo S. Review of current understanding of post-
traumatic osteoarthritis resulting from sports injuries. J Orthop
Res. 2017;35:397–405.
6. Brophy RH, Gray BL, Nunley RM, Barrack RL, Clohisy JC.
Total knee arthroplasty after previous knee surgery. J Bone Jt
Surg Am. 2014;96:801–5.
7. Little CB, Hunter DJ. Post-traumatic osteoarthritis: from mouse
models to clinical trials. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2013;9:485–97.
8. Øiestad BE, Juhl CB, Eitzen I, Thorlund JB. Knee extensor mus-
cle weakness is a risk factor for development of knee osteoar-
thritis. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Osteoarthr Cartil.
2015;23:171–7.
9. Lepley AS, Gribble PA, Thomas AC, Tevald MA, Sohn DH, Piet-
rosimone BG. Quadriceps neural alterations in anterior cruciate
ligament reconstructed patients: a 6-month longitudinal investi-
gation. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2015;25:828–39.
10. Harkey MS, Luc-Harkey BA, Lepley AS, Grindstaff TL, Grib-
ble P, Blackburn JT, etal. Persistent muscle inhibition after
anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Med Sci Sport Exerc.
2016;48:2370–7.
11. Larsen JB, Farup J, Lind M, Dalgas U. Muscle strength and func-
tional performance is markedly impaired at the recommended
time point for sport return after anterior cruciate ligament recon-
struction in recreational athletes. Hum Mov Sci. 2015;39:73–87.
12. Tengman E, Olofsson LB, Stensdotter AK, Nilsson KG, Häger
CK, Tengman E. Anterior cruciate ligament injury after more
than 20 years. II. Concentric and eccentric knee muscle strength.
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2014;24:e501-509.
13. Lewek M, Rudolph K, Axe M, Snyder-Mackler L. The effect of
insufficient quadriceps strength on gait after anterior cruciate
ligament reconstruction. Clin Biomech. 2002;17:56–63.
14. Hart HF, Culvenor AG, Collins NJ, Ackland DC, Cowan
SM, Machotka Z, etal. Knee kinematics and joint moments
during gait following anterior cruciate ligament econstruc-
tion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med.
2016;50:597–612.
15. Andriacchi TP, Koo S, Scanlan SF. Gait mechanics influence
healthy cartilage morphology and osteoarthritis of the knee. J
Bone Jt Surg Am. 2009;91:95–101.
16. Whittaker JL, Roos EM. A pragmatic approach to prevent post-
traumatic osteoarthritis after sport or exercise-related joint injury.
Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2019;33:158–71.
17. Allen KD, Choong PF, Davis AM, Dowsey MM, Dziedzic KS,
Emery C, etal. Osteoarthritis: Models for appropriate care
across the disease continuum. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol.
2016;30:503–35.
18. Karanikas K, Arampatzis A, Brüggemann GP. Motor task and
muscle strength followed different adaptation patterns after ante-
rior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med.
2009;45:37–45.
19. Hart JM, Pietrosimone B, Hertel J, Ingersoll CD. Quadriceps
activation following knee injuries: a systematic review. J Athl
Train. 2010;45:87–97.
20. Kuenze CM, Hertel J, Weltman A, Diduch D, Saliba SA, Hart
JM. Persistent neuromuscular and corticomotor quadriceps asym-
metry after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Athl
Train. 2015;50:303–12.
21. Wieschhoff GG, Mandell JC, Czuczman GJ, Nikac V, Shah N,
Smith SE. Acute non-contact anterior cruciate ligament tears are
associated with relatively increased vastus medialis to semimem-
branosus cross-sectional area ratio: a case-control retrospective
MR study. Skeletal Radiol. 2017;46:1469–75.
22. Pamukoff DN, Pietrosimone BG, Ryan ED, Lee DR, Black-
burn JT. Quadriceps function and hamstrings co-activation
after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Athl Train.
2017;52:422–8.
23. Vairo GL, Myers JB, Sell TC, Fu FH, Harner CD, Lephart SM.
Neuromuscular and biomechanical landing performance subse-
quent to ipsilateral semitendinosus and gracilis autograft anterior
cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sport Traumatol
Arthrosc. 2008;16:2–14.
24. Sasaki K, Neptune RR. Individual muscle contributions to the
axial knee joint contact force during normal walking. J Biomech.
2010;43:2780–4.
25. Petersen W, Taheri P, Forkel P, Zantop T. Return to play fol-
lowing ACL reconstruction: a systematic review about strength
deficits. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2014;134:1417–28.
26. Lisee C, Lepley AS, Birchmeier T, O’Hagan K, Kuenze C.
Quadriceps strength and volitional activation after anterior
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
336 B.Tayfur et al.
cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-
analysis. Sport Health. 2019;11:163–79.
27. Hall M, Juhl CB, Lund H, Thorlund JB. Knee extensor mus-
cle strength in middle-aged and older individuals undergoing
arthroscopic partial meniscectomy: a systematic review and
meta-analysis. Arthritis Care Res. 2015;67:1289–96.
28. Xergia SA, Mcclelland JA, Kvist J, Vasiliadis HS, Georgoulis
AD. The influence of graft choice on isokinetic muscle strength
4–24 months after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
Knee Surg Sport Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011;5:768–80.
29. Van Meer BL, Oei EHG, Meuffels DE, Van Arkel ERA, Verhaar
JAN, Bierma-Zeinstra SMA, etal. Degenerative changes in the
knee 2 years after anterior cruciate ligament rupture and related
risk factors: a prospective observational follow-up study. Am J
Sports Med. 2016;44:1524–33.
30. Mirkov DM, Knezevic OM, Maffiuletti NA, Kadija M, Nedeljko-
vic A, Jaric S. Contralateral limb deficit after ACL-reconstruc-
tion: an analysis of early and late phase of rate of force develop-
ment. J Sports Sci. 2017;35:435–40.
31. Hiemstra LA, Webber S, MacDonald PB, Kriellaars DJ. Con-
tralateral limb strength deficits after anterior cruciate ligament
reconstruction using a hamstring tendon graft. Clin Biomech.
2007;22:543–50.
32. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting
items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA
statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151:264.
33. Downs SH, Black N. The feasibility of creating a checklist for the
assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and
non-randomised studies of health care interventions. J Epidemiol
Community Health. 1998;52:377–84.
34. Deasy M, Leahy E, Semciw AI. Hip strength deficits in people
with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review with
meta-analysis. J Orthop Sport Phys Ther. 2016;46:629–39.
35. Munn J, Sullivan SJ, Schneiders AG. Evidence of sensorimotor
deficits in functional ankle instability: a systematic review with
meta-analysis. J Sci Med Sport. 2010;13:2–12.
36. Zhang Z, Xu X, Ni H. Small studies may overestimate the effect
sizes in critical care meta-analyses: a meta-epidemiological
study. Crit Care. 2013;17:R2.
37. Sterne JA, Egger M, Smith GD. Systematic reviews in health
care: Investigating and dealing with publication and other biases
in meta-analysis. BMJ. 2001;323:101–5.
38. Higgins JPT, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring
inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;327:557–60.
39. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences.
2nd ed. Cambridge: Academic press; 2013.
40. van Tulder M, Furlan A, Bombardier C, Bouter L, Editorial Board
of the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group. Updated
method guidelines for systematic reviews in the Cochrane col-
laboration back review group. Spine. 2003;28:1290–9.
41. de Almeida AM, Santos Silva PR, Pedrinelli A, Hernandez AJ.
Aerobic fitness in professional soccer players after anterior cruci-
ate ligament reconstruction. PLoS ONE. 2018;13:e0194432.
42. Chung KS, Ha JK, Yeom CH, Ra HJ, Lim JW, Kwon MS, etal.
Are muscle strength and function of the uninjured lower limb
weakened after anterior cruciate ligament injury? Am J Sports
Med. 2015;43:3013–21.
43. Clagg S, Paterno MV, Hewett TE, Schmitt LC. Performance
on the modified star excursion balance test at the time of return
to sport following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J
Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2015;45:444–52.
44. Engelen-van Melick N, van Cingel REH, van Tienen TG,
Nijhuis-van der Sanden MWG. Functional performance
2–9 years after ACL reconstruction: cross-sectional com-
parison between athletes with bone–patellar tendon–bone,
semitendinosus/gracilis and healthy controls. Knee Surg Sport
Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017;25:1412–23.
45. Freddolini M, Battaglioli A, Chiechi F, Placella G, Georgoulis
A, Cerulli G, etal. Electromechanical delay of the knee flexor
muscles after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using
semitendinosus tendon. Sport Biomech. 2015;14:384–93.
46. Garrison JC, Hannon J, Goto S, Giesler L, Bush C, Both-
well JM. Participants at three months post-operative anterior
cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL-R) demonstrate dif-
ferences in lower extremity energy absorption contribution
and quadriceps strength compared to healthy controls. Knee.
2018;25:782–9.
47. Goetschius J, Hart JM. Knee-extension torque variability and
subjective knee function in patients with a history of anterior
cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Athl Train. 2016;51:22–7.
48. Goetschius J, Hertel J, Saliba S, Brockmeier SF, Hart JM. The
effects of patellar tendon vibration on quadriceps strength in
anterior cruciate ligament reconstructed knees. Phys Ther Sport.
2019;40:71–7.
49. Hall M, Wrigley TV, Metcalf BR, Hinman RS, Dempsey AR,
Mills PM, etal. A longitudinal study of strength and gait after
arthroscopic partial meniscectomy. Med Sci Sport Exerc.
2013;45:2036–43.
50. Holsgaard-Larsen A, Jensen C, Mortensen NHM, Aagaard P.
Concurrent assessments of lower limb loading patterns, mechani-
cal muscle strength and functional performance in ACL-patients
— a cross-sectional study. Knee. 2014;21:66–73.
51. Hsiao S-F, Chou P-H, Hsu H-C, Lue Y-J. Changes of muscle
mechanics associated with anterior cruciate ligament deficiency
and reconstruction. J Strength Cond Res. 2014;28:390–400.
52. Hsieh C-J, Indelicato PA, Moser MW, Vandenborne K,
Chmielewski TL. Speed, not magnitude, of knee extensor torque
production is associated with self-reported knee function early
after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sport
Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015;23:3214–20.
53. Ilich SS, Dempsey AR, Mills PM, Sturnieks DL, Stachowiak
GW, Maguire KF, etal. Physical activity patterns and function 3
months after arthroscopic partial meniscectomy. J Sci Med Sport.
2013;16:195–9.
54. Johnson AK, Palmieri-Smith RM, Lepley LK. Contribution of
neuromuscular factors to quadriceps asymmetry after anterior
cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Athl Train. 2018;53:347–54.
55. Kaminska E, Piontek T, Wiernicka M, Cywinska-Wasilewska
G, Lewandowski J, Lochynski D. Differences in isokinetic
strength of the knee extensors and flexors in men with isolated
and combined cruciate-ligament knee injury. J Sport Rehabil.
2015;24:268–77.
56. Kellis E, Galanis N, Kofotolis N. Hamstring-to-quadriceps ratio
in female athletes with a previous hamstring injury, anterior cru-
ciate ligament reconstruction, and controls. Sports. 2019;7:214.
57. Kline PW, Burnham J, Yonz M, Johnson D, Ireland ML, Noehren
B. Hip external rotation strength predicts hop performance after
anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sport Trau-
matol Arthrosc. 2018;26:1137–44.
58. Krishnan C, Williams GN. Factors explaining chronic knee
extensor strength deficits after ACL reconstruction. J Orthop
Res. 2011;29:633–40.
59. Kuenze CM, Kelly AR, Jun H-P, Eltoukhy M. Unilateral quadri-
ceps strengthening with disinhibitory cryotherapy and quadriceps
symmetry after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Athl
Train. 2017;52:1010–8.
60. Kvist J, Karlberg C, Gerdle B, Gillquist J. Anterior tibial transla-
tion during different isokinetic quadriceps torque in anterior cru-
ciate ligament deficient and nonimpaired individuals. J Orthop
Sport Phys Ther. 2001;31:4–15.
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
337
Neuromuscular Function Following Knee Injuries: Does It Ever Get Back to Normal?
61. Lepley AS, Ericksen HM, Sohn DH, Pietrosimone BG. Contribu-
tions of neural excitability and voluntary activation to quadriceps
muscle strength following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruc-
tion. Knee. 2014;21:736–42.
62. Lepley AS, Grooms DR, Burland JP, Davi SM, Kinsella-Shaw
JM, Lepley LK. Quadriceps muscle function following ante-
rior cruciate ligament reconstruction: systemic differences
in neural and morphological characteristics. Exp Brain Res.
2019;237:1267–78.
63. Maeda N, Urabe Y, Tsutsumi S, Fujishita H, Numano S, Takeuchi
T, etal. Symmetry tensiomyographic neuromuscular response
after chronic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.
Knee Surg Sport Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018;26:411–7.
64. Norte GE, Hertel J, Saliba SA, Diduch DR, Hart JM. Quadri-
ceps neuromuscular function in patients with anterior cruciate
ligament reconstruction with or without knee osteoarthritis: a
cross-sectional study. J Athl Train. 2018;53:475–85.
65. Oeffinger DJ, Shapiro R, Nyland J, Pienkowski D, Caborn DNM.
Delayed gastrocnemius muscle response to sudden perturbation
in rehabilitated patients with anterior cruciate ligament recon-
struction. Knee Surg Sport Traumatol Arthrosc. 2001;9:19–27.
66. O’Malley E, Richter C, King E, Strike S, Moran K, Franklyn-
Miller A, etal. Countermovement jump and isokinetic dynamom-
etry as measures of rehabilitation status after anterior cruciate
ligament reconstruction. J Athl Train. 2018;53:687–95.
67. Pamukoff DN, Montgomery MM, Choe KH, Moffit TJ, Garcia
SA, Vakula MN. Bilateral alterations in running mechanics and
quadriceps function following unilateral anterior cruciate liga-
ment reconstruction. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2018;48:960–7.
68. Reed-Jones RJ, Vallis LA. Kinematics and muscular
responses to a ramp descent in the ACL deficient knee. Knee.
2008;15:117–24.
69. Ristanis S, Tsepis E, Giotis D, Stergiou N, Cerulli G, Georgou-
lis AD. Electromechanical delay of the knee flexor muscles is
impaired after harvesting hamstring tendons for anterior cruciate
ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37:2179–86.
70. Roos PE, Button K, van Deursen RWM. Motor control strate-
gies during double leg squat following anterior cruciate ligament
rupture and reconstruction: an observational study. J Neuroeng
Rehabil. 2014;11:19.
71. Scheurer SA, Sherman DA, Glaviano NR, Ingersoll CD, Norte
GE. Corticomotor function is associated with quadriceps rate of
torque development in individuals with ACL surgery. Exp Brain
Res. 2020;238:283–94.
72. Sturnieks DL, Besier TF, Hamer PW, Ackland TR, Mills PM,
Stachowiak GW, etal. Knee strength and knee adduction
moments following arthroscopic partial meniscectomy. Med Sci
Sport Exerc. 2008;40:991–7.
73. Thomas AC, Lepley LK, Wojtys EM, McLean SG, Palmieri-
Smith RM. Effects of neuromuscular fatigue on quadriceps
strength and activation and knee biomechanics in individu-
als post–anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and healthy
adults. J Orthop Sport Phys Ther. 2015;45:1042–50.
74. Thorlund JB, Aagaard P, Roos EM. Thigh muscle strength,
functional capacity, and self-reported function in patients at
high risk of knee osteoarthritis compared with controls. Arthri-
tis Care Res. 2010;62:1244–51.
75. Thorlund JB, Aagaard P, Roos EM. Muscle strength and func-
tional performance in patients at high risk of knee osteoarthri-
tis: a follow-up study. Knee Surg Sport Traumatol Arthrosc.
2012;20:1110–7.
76. Tourville TW, Jarrell KM, Naud S, Slauterbeck JR, Johnson
RJ, Beynnon BD. Relationship between isokinetic strength and
tibiofemoral joint space width changes after anterior cruciate
ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42:302–11.
77. Tsarouhas A, Giakas G, Malizos KN, Spiropoulos G, Sideris
V, Koutedakis Y, etal. Dynamic effect of quadriceps mus-
cle activation on anterior tibial translation after single-bundle
and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg. 2015;31:1303–9.
78. Vairo GL. Knee flexor strength and endurance profiles after
ipsilateral hamstring tendons anterior cruciate ligament recon-
struction. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;95:552–61.
79. Vairo GL, Miller SJ, Sherbondy PS, Sebastianelli WJ, Buckley
WE. Standing flexion deficits predict self-reported outcomes
in women after ipsilateral hamstring anterior cruciate ligament
reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2013;29:1796–803.
80. Ward SH, Perraton L, Bennell K, Pietrosimone B, Bryant AL.
Deficits in quadriceps force control after anterior cruciate
ligament injury: potential central mechanisms. J Athl Train.
2019;54:505–12.
81. Welling W, Benjaminse A, Lemmink K, Dingenen B, Gokeler
A. Progressive strength training restores quadriceps and
hamstring muscle strength within 7 months after ACL recon-
struction in amateur male soccer players. Phys Ther Sport.
2019;40:10–8.
82. Xergia SA, Pappas E, Zampeli F, Georgiou S, Georgoulis AD.
Asymmetries in functional hop tests, lower extremity kinematics,
and isokinetic strength persist 6 to 9 months following anterior
cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther.
2013;43:154–62.
83. Zarzycki R, Morton SM, Charalambous CC, Marmon A, Sny-
der-Mackler L. Corticospinal and intracortical excitability dif-
fer between athletes early after ACLR and matched controls. J
Orthop Res. 2018;36:2941–8.
84. Zult T, Gokeler A, van Raay JJAM, Brouwer RW, Zijdewind
I, Hortobágyi T. An anterior cruciate ligament injury does not
affect the neuromuscular function of the non-injured leg except
for dynamic balance and voluntary quadriceps activation. Knee
Surg Sport Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017;25:172–83.
85. Zwolski C, Schmitt LC, Thomas S, Hewett TE, Paterno MV. The
utility of limb symmetry indices in return-to-sport assessment in
patients with bilateral anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
Am J Sports Med. 2016;44:2030–8.
86. Myer GD, Paterno MV, Ford KR, Quatman CE, Hewett TE.
Rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction:
criteria-based progression through the return-to-sport phase. J
Orthop Sport Phys Ther. 2006;36:385–402.
87. van Melick N, van Cingel REH, Brooijmans F, Neeter C, van
Tienen T, Hullegie W, etal. Evidence-based clinical practice
update: practice guidelines for anterior cruciate ligament reha-
bilitation based on a systematic review and multidisciplinary
consensus. Br J Sports Med. 2016;50:1506–15.
88. Adams D, Logerstedt D, Hunter-Giordano A, Axe MJ, Snyder-
Mackler L. Current concepts for anterior cruciate ligament recon-
struction: a criterion-based rehabilitation progression. J Orthop
Sport Phys Ther. 2012;42:601–14.
89. Hopkins JT, Ingersoll CD. Arthrogenic muscle inhibition: a limit-
ing factor in joint rehabilitation. J Sport Rehabil. 2000;9:135–59.
90. Sonnery-Cottet B, Saithna A, Quelard B, Daggett M, Borade
A, Ouanezar H, etal. Arthrogenic muscle inhibition after ACL
reconstruction: a scoping review of the efficacy of interventions.
Br J Sports Med. 2019;53:289–98.
91. Hart JM, Kuenze CM, Diduch DR, Ingersoll CD. Quadriceps
muscle function after rehabilitation with cryotherapy in patients
with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Athl Train.
2014;49:733–9.
92. Lynch AD, Logerstedt DS, Grindem H, Eitzen I, Hicks GE, Axe
MJ, etal. Consensus criteria for defining “successful outcome”
after ACL injury and reconstruction: a Delaware-Oslo ACL
cohort investigation. Br J Sports Med. 2015;49:335–42.
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
338 B.Tayfur et al.
93. Filbay SR, Grindem H. Evidence-based recommendations for the
management of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture. Best
Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2019;33:33–47.
94. Hopkins JT, Ingersoll CD, Andrew Krause B, Edwards JE,
Cordova ML. Effect of knee joint effusion on quadriceps and
soleus motoneuron pool excitability. Med Sci Sports Exerc.
2001;33:123–6.
95. Park J, Hopkins JT. Induced anterior knee pain immediately
reduces involuntary and voluntary quadriceps activation. Clin J
Sport Med. 2013;23:19–24.
96. Palmieri RM, Tom JA, Edwards JE, Weltman A, Saliba EN, Mis-
try DJ, etal. Arthrogenic muscle response induced by an experi-
mental knee joint effusion is mediated by pre- and post-synaptic
spinal mechanisms. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2004;14:631–40.
97. Hopkins JT, Ingersoll CD, Edwards JE, Cordova ML. Changes
in soleus motoneuron pool excitability after artificial knee joint
effusion. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000;81:1199–203.
98. Groppa S, Oliviero A, Eisen A, Quartarone A, Cohen LG, Mall
V, etal. A practical guide to diagnostic transcranial magnetic
stimulation: report of an IFCN committee. Clin Neurophysiol.
2012;123:858–82.
99. Bodkin SG, Norte GE, Hart JM. Corticospinal excitability can
discriminate quadriceps strength indicative of knee function after
ACL-reconstruction. Scand J Med Sci Sport. 2019;29:716–24.
100. Alkjaer T, Raffalt PC, Dalsgaard H, Simonsen EB, Petersen NC,
Bliddal H, etal. Gait variability and motor control in people with
knee osteoarthritis. Gait Posture. 2015;42:479–84.
101. Pietrosimone BG, McLeod MM, Lepley AS. A theoretical frame-
work for understanding neuromuscular response to lower extrem-
ity joint injury. Sport Health. 2012;4:31–5.
102. Relph N, Herrington L, Tyson S. The effects of ACL injury
on knee proprioception: a meta-analysis. Physiotherapy.
2014;100:187–95.
103. Luc B, Gribble PA, Pietrosimone BG. Osteoarthritis prevalence
following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a system-
atic review and numbers-needed-to-treat analysis. J Athl Train.
2014;49:806–19.
104. Risberg MA, Oiestad BE, Gunderson R, Aune AK, Engebretsen
L, Culvenor A, etal. Changes in knee osteoarthritis, symptoms,
and function after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am
J Sports Med. 2015;44:1215–24.
105. Lepley LK, Wojtys EM, Palmieri-Smith RM. Does concomitant
meniscectomy or meniscal repair affect the recovery of quadri-
ceps function post-ACL reconstruction? Knee Surg Sport Trau-
matol Arthrosc. 2015;23:2756–61.
106. Aagaard P, Simonsen EB, Andersen JL, Magnusson P, Dyhre-
Poulsen P. Increased rate of force development and neural drive
of human skeletal muscle following resistance training. J Appl
Physiol. 2002;93:1318–26.
107. Angelozzi M, Madama M, Corsica C, Calvisi V, Properzi G,
McCaw ST, etal. Rate of force development as an adjunctive
outcome measure for return-to-sport decisions after anterior
cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Orthop Sport Phys Ther.
2012;42:772–80.
108. Andersen LL, Aagaard P. Influence of maximal muscle strength
and intrinsic muscle contractile properties on contractile rate of
force development. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2006;96:46–52.
109. Kaneko F, Onari K, Kawaguchi K, Tsukisaka K, Roy SH. Elec-
tromechanical delay after ACL reconstruction: an innovative
method for investigating central and peripheral contributions. J
Orthop Sport Phys Ther. 2002;32:158–65.
110. Pääsuke M, Ereline J, Gapeyeva H. Knee extension strength and
vertical jumping performance in nordic combined athletes. J
Sports Med Phys Fit. 2001;41:354–61.
111. Andriacchi TP, Favre J. The nature of invivo mechanical signals
that influence cartilage health and progression to knee osteoar-
thritis. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2014;16:463.
112. Hortobágyi T, Garry J, Holbert D, Devita P. Aberrations in the
control of quadriceps muscle force in patients with knee osteo-
arthritis. Arthritis Care Res. 2004;51:562–9.
113. Williams GN, Buchanan TS, Barrance PJ, Axe MJ, Snyder-Mack-
ler L. Quadriceps weakness, atrophy, and activation failure in
predicted noncopers after anterior cruciate ligament injury. Am
J Sports Med. 2005;33:402–7.
114. Thomas AC, Wojtys EM, Brandon C, Palmieri-Smith RM. Mus-
cle atrophy contributes to quadriceps weakness after anterior cru-
ciate ligament reconstruction. J Sci Med Sport. 2016;19:7–11.
115. Kambhampati SBS, Vaishya R. Trends in publications on the
anterior cruciate ligament over the past 40 years on PubMed.
Orthop J Sport Med. 2019;7:2325967119856883.
116. Smeets A, Malfait B, Dingenen B, Robinson MA, Vanrenterghem
J, Peers K, etal. Is knee neuromuscular activity related to
anterior cruciate ligament injury risk? A pilot study. Knee.
2019;26:40–51.
117. Kobayashi H, Koyama Y, Enoka RM, Suzuki S. A unique form
of light-load training improves steadiness and performance on
some functional tasks in older adults. Scand J Med Sci Sports.
2014;24:98–110.
118. Gruber M, Gollhofer A. Impact of sensorimotor training on
the rate of force development and neural activation. Eur J Appl
Physiol. 2004;92:98–105.
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Terms and Conditions
Springer Nature journal content, brought to you courtesy of Springer Nature Customer Service Center GmbH (“Springer Nature”).
Springer Nature supports a reasonable amount of sharing of research papers by authors, subscribers and authorised users (“Users”), for small-
scale personal, non-commercial use provided that all copyright, trade and service marks and other proprietary notices are maintained. By
accessing, sharing, receiving or otherwise using the Springer Nature journal content you agree to these terms of use (“Terms”). For these
purposes, Springer Nature considers academic use (by researchers and students) to be non-commercial.
These Terms are supplementary and will apply in addition to any applicable website terms and conditions, a relevant site licence or a personal
subscription. These Terms will prevail over any conflict or ambiguity with regards to the relevant terms, a site licence or a personal subscription
(to the extent of the conflict or ambiguity only). For Creative Commons-licensed articles, the terms of the Creative Commons license used will
apply.
We collect and use personal data to provide access to the Springer Nature journal content. We may also use these personal data internally within
ResearchGate and Springer Nature and as agreed share it, in an anonymised way, for purposes of tracking, analysis and reporting. We will not
otherwise disclose your personal data outside the ResearchGate or the Springer Nature group of companies unless we have your permission as
detailed in the Privacy Policy.
While Users may use the Springer Nature journal content for small scale, personal non-commercial use, it is important to note that Users may
not:
use such content for the purpose of providing other users with access on a regular or large scale basis or as a means to circumvent access
control;
use such content where to do so would be considered a criminal or statutory offence in any jurisdiction, or gives rise to civil liability, or is
otherwise unlawful;
falsely or misleadingly imply or suggest endorsement, approval , sponsorship, or association unless explicitly agreed to by Springer Nature in
writing;
use bots or other automated methods to access the content or redirect messages
override any security feature or exclusionary protocol; or
share the content in order to create substitute for Springer Nature products or services or a systematic database of Springer Nature journal
content.
In line with the restriction against commercial use, Springer Nature does not permit the creation of a product or service that creates revenue,
royalties, rent or income from our content or its inclusion as part of a paid for service or for other commercial gain. Springer Nature journal
content cannot be used for inter-library loans and librarians may not upload Springer Nature journal content on a large scale into their, or any
other, institutional repository.
These terms of use are reviewed regularly and may be amended at any time. Springer Nature is not obligated to publish any information or
content on this website and may remove it or features or functionality at our sole discretion, at any time with or without notice. Springer Nature
may revoke this licence to you at any time and remove access to any copies of the Springer Nature journal content which have been saved.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, Springer Nature makes no warranties, representations or guarantees to Users, either express or implied
with respect to the Springer nature journal content and all parties disclaim and waive any implied warranties or warranties imposed by law,
including merchantability or fitness for any particular purpose.
Please note that these rights do not automatically extend to content, data or other material published by Springer Nature that may be licensed
from third parties.
If you would like to use or distribute our Springer Nature journal content to a wider audience or on a regular basis or in any other manner not
expressly permitted by these Terms, please contact Springer Nature at
onlineservice@springernature.com
... jospt methods | research report surgery are linked to a recalcitrant decline in quadriceps muscles' performance. 65 This decline can persist for decades after injury or ACLR, 65,66 even with treatment. 72 Quadriceps muscles' performance deficits may impair knee function and quality of life (QoL) 2,6,70 and contribute to elevated risk of post-traumatic osteoarthritis. ...
... jospt methods | research report surgery are linked to a recalcitrant decline in quadriceps muscles' performance. 65 This decline can persist for decades after injury or ACLR, 65,66 even with treatment. 72 Quadriceps muscles' performance deficits may impair knee function and quality of life (QoL) 2,6,70 and contribute to elevated risk of post-traumatic osteoarthritis. ...
... While ACL tear/ACLR-related quadriceps strength impairments are well documented, 11,65 less is known about the quadriceps muscles' ability to rapidly contract and produce force in response to neuromuscular activation, referred to as explosive neuromuscular performance (ENP). 25 Rapid force production is essential for sport-related (sprinting, jumping, kicking) 1 and daily (descending stairs, walking briskly) tasks that require force development within 50-250 ms. ...
Article
OBJECTIVES: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears and subsequent reconstruction surgery are associated with a recalcitrant decline in quadriceps muscles’ performance, which can persist for decades, contributing to impaired function, elevated osteoarthritis risk, and poor quality of life. Little is known about why this decline occurs, or if it can be prevented. One important component of quadriceps muscles’ performance that may be impacted by an ACL tear or ACL reconstruction (ACLR) surgery is the ability to rapidly contract and produce force in response to neuromuscular activation, known as explosive neuromuscular performance. This study will compare quadriceps muscles explosive neuromuscular performance and its determinants between injured and uninjured legs of individuals 9–48 months after primary ACLR. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study METHODS: This cross-sectional study will include 48 individuals aged 18–40 years, 9–48 months past a first-time ACLR performed within 12 months of an ACL tear. The primary outcome is isometric knee extension torque (Nm; computerized dynamometry, 90° flexion) at 100 ms after first electrical onset of any quadriceps muscle (electromyography). Secondary outcomes include rate of knee extension torque development (computerized dynamometry), electromechanical delay (electromyography), patellar tendon stiffness (myotonometry), and patellar tendon cross-sectional area (ultrasound imaging). A mixed-effects regression model (95% confidence interval) will assess between-group differences for all outcomes, adjusted for ACL graft harvest site and sex. The association between explosive neuromuscular performance and secondary outcomes will be explored as appropriate. DISCUSSION: Improved understanding of quadriceps muscles explosive neuromuscular performance and its determinants could shed light on mechanisms that underlie the decline in quadriceps muscles’ performance seen after ACL reconstruction and inform treatment targets. JOSPT Methods 2025;1(1):8-16. Epub 25 November 2024. doi:10.2519/josptmethods.2024.0102
... Furthermore, a recent meta-analysis of 46 ACL studies, which combined ACL-deficient and ACLreconstructed groups due to their comparable outcomes and minimal heterogeneity, revealed that although deficits in strength and voluntary activation were evident early in recovery, cortical excitability did not exhibit significant changes before 6 months post-surgery or injury. Studies conducted between 6 and 12 months postsurgery reported a large effect size, while those beyond 24 months showed a moderate effect size 20 . This indicates that the neurophysiological effects of WBV may be better assessed in the later stages of recovery when neural adaptations are more pronounced and responsive to intervention. ...
Article
Full-text available
Previous studies have shown that athletes recovering from anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction experience a decline in motor cortex excitability and injury-related cortical reorganization, potentially leading to ongoing complications and a higher risk of subsequent injuries. Therefore, incorporating an intervention that consistently delivers sensory inputs to the central nervous system and enhances excitability at both spinal and supra-spinal levels, in addition to exercise therapy, may offer greater benefits. The purpose of this study was to explore whether combining whole body vibration (WBV) with exercise therapy enhances motor cortical excitability in athletes undergoing ACL reconstruction more effectively than exercise therapy alone. Additionally, it aimed to assess whether this combination improves quadriceps strength and reduces functional limitations in daily activities. This study is a randomized, single-blinded, controlled trial. Twenty-six participants were assigned to either the WBV plus exercise therapy group (intervention group) or the exercise therapy-only group (control group). Outcome measures, assessed before and after treatment, included motor cortex excitability [active motor threshold (AMT) and motor-evoked potential amplitude of the quadriceps], isometric peak torque of the quadriceps, and daily functional disabilities using the knee outcome survey activities of daily living scale (KOS-ADL scale). The treatment period consisted of 12 sessions (4 weeks, with 3 sessions per week). A two-way mixed ANOVA was conducted to examine the main effects of group, time and their interactions. The results showed that in the intervention group (WBV plus exercise therapy), AMT significantly decreased (F(1, 12) = 11.35, P = 0.006, η² = 0.486), while the control group (exercise therapy only) showed no significant change (F(1, 12) = 0.252, P = 0.625, η² = 0.021). In the intervention group, AMT decreased by 19.47% post-treatment. Both groups showed significant improvements in isometric peak torque and KOS-ADL scores (P < 0.001), with large effect sizes for these parameters. The study concluded that adding WBV to exercise therapy is more effective in increasing motor cortex excitability compared to exercise therapy alone. However, since both groups showed significant improvements in quadriceps peak torque and KOS-ADL scores, it suggests that the addition of WBV did not provide substantial added benefits in enhancing quadriceps strength and improving daily functional abilities. The observed improvements may primarily be attributed to exercise therapy. Nonetheless, it is important to consider the small sample size and low statistical power when interpreting these results. RCT registration: On the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT20220220054078N1).
... Studies by Tayfur et al. emphasize the interaction of muscular and neural factors in post-ACL repair rehabilitation. The loss of muscle size and function is compounded by a diminished sensory role of the ACL, which plays a critical role in proprioception [128]. While structural stability is a major focus of ACLR, restoring the sensory function of the knee is equally important for long-term success and preventing reinjury. ...
Article
Full-text available
This narrative review explores the significant evolution of sports rehabilitation, tracing its trajectory from basic exercise therapies of the early 20th century to the advanced, neuroplasticity-driven approaches of the 21st century, with a specific focus on anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). The primary aim is to understand how neuroplasticity, motor control, and sensorimotor retraining can optimize recovery, reduce reinjury risk, and enhance long-term athletic performance, and to synthesize current rehabilitation strategies that integrate innovative technologies, such as robotics, virtual reality (VR), and biofeedback systems, to address the neurocognitive deficits that contribute to the alarmingly high reinjury rates (9–29%) observed in young athletes post-ACLR. These deficits include impaired proprioception, motor control, and psychological factors like fear of reinjury. The methodology employed involves a narrative review of peer-reviewed literature from databases including PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. The synthesis of findings underscores the importance of holistic rehabilitation approaches, including targeted proprioceptive exercises, dual-task drills, and immersive VR training, in enhancing sensorimotor integration, decision-making, and athlete confidence. Furthermore, this review highlights the critical need for long-term monitoring and interdisciplinary collaboration between neuroscientists, physiotherapists, and engineers to refine rehabilitation protocols and ensure sustained recovery. By leveraging neuroplasticity and advanced technologies, the field can shift from a focus on purely physical restoration to comprehensive recovery models that significantly reduce reinjury risks and optimize athletic performance.
... One of the factors influencing the ability to adapt to injury in these individuals is neuromuscular coordination [7], which is disrupted by the loss of afferent feedback from the ACL [8]. The absence of feedback also leads to a reduction in knee proprioception [9], which is a primary contributor to knee instability in injury nonadaptive patients [10]. To improve the neuromuscular system, perturbation training is typically performed on balance boards once acute symptoms subside, involving anterior-posterior and internal-external perturbations as well as multi-directional perturbations [11]. ...
... Furthermore, isokinetic extension power was reduced by 31% and 29% at angular velocities of 90°/sec and 180°/ sec, respectively [4]. Lower limb paralysis may remain for years following PF surgery, increasing the risk of reinjury and joint deterioration [5]. As a result, immediate rehabilitation is essential for maintaining and improving quadriceps strength. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background Patellar fracture surgeries are associated with subsequent atrophy and weakness in the muscles of the lower limb. Individualized blood flow restriction training is progressively being recognized as a potential technique for improving muscular hypertrophy and accompanying strength in participants recovering from surgery. This study aimed to investigate the overall feasibility and observational outcomes of individualized blood flow restriction training for participants recovering from patellar fracture surgery. Methods A 47-year-old male (Participant one, body mass: 65 kg, height: 1.75 m, body mass index: 21.2 kg/m², three months post-patellar fracture surgery) and a 28-year-old female (Participant two, body mass: 53 kg, height: 1.67 m, body mass index: 19.8 kg/m², three months post-patellar fracture surgery) performed straight leg raises and leg extensions with individualized blood flow restriction for six weeks. The blood supply to the leg with the patellar fracture was partially restricted using a thigh pressure cuff inflated to 60% of the limb occlusion pressure. Peak torque of knee extensor, rectus femoris cross-sectional area, rectus femoris stiffness, and Lysholm score were measured at baseline and post-training. Results Compared to baseline, the post-training peak torque of the knee extensor, rectus femoris cross-sectional area, rectus femoris stiffness, and Lysholm score of participants one post-surgical leg increased by 48.2%, 7.9%, 7.9%, and 23 points, respectively; those of participant two increased by 134.7%, 6.8%, 14.2%, and 30 points, respectively. Conclusions The results showed that the individualized blood flow restriction training was feasible and suggested promising outcomes for participants after surgery. Further research with a large sample size is required to flesh out and generalize the training program. Trial registration The Nanjing First Hospital’s ethics committee accepted the research before testing. The clinical test was documented with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05371431, Registered 08–20-2020, prospectively registered).
Article
A higher risk of knee osteoarthritis (OA) has been identified in patients with slower walking speeds following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Given that altered loading of the surgical knee has been the most proposed mechanism for early knee OA post-ACLR, understanding how modulating walking speed may modify knee joint loading is essential for developing strategies to reduce the risk of knee OA in ACLR patients. The purpose of this study was to determine how modulation of walking speed affects knee joint loading during overground walking post-ACLR. Lower extremity kinematics and kinetics were recorded during overground walking at a self-selected, slower, and faster speed from 16 patients with unilateral ACLR. The results showed that ACLR patients demonstrated lesser peak knee flexion and adduction moments of the surgical knees when walking at slower speeds. However, modulating walking speed did not alter between-limb knee loading asymmetry. The ACLR limbs had lower peak knee flexion moments than the uninjured limbs across all 3 walking speeds. Although interventions that increase walking speed may deter the onset of knee OA by elevating the mechanical stimulation at the surgical knee, additional gait training strategies may be needed to restore the between-limb loading symmetry in ACLR patients.
Article
Full-text available
Background and Purpose Individuals following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) are at increased risk for subsequent anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury, with quadriceps strength deficits being a risk factor. While early measures of quadriceps strength can predict strength in the later stages of rehabilitation, it remains unclear whether isometric rate of torque development (RTD) is related to later outcomes. The purpose of this study was to examine the correlation between quadriceps RTD values at four months post-ACLR and quadriceps isokinetic peak torque values at six months post-ACLR. It was hypothesized that isometric RTD at four months would be significantly correlated with isokinetic peak torque at six months post-ACLR. A secondary hypothesis was that the involved limb RT would be significantly slower than the uninvolved limb at four months post-operative. Study Design Retrospective case series Methods Forty-seven patients (22 males and 25 females) who had undergone ACLR performed isometric testing at four months and isokinetic testing at six months post-operatively. Isometric testing was utilized to measure torque from 0-100ms (RTD 100 ) and from 100-200ms (RTD 200 ), and isometric peak torque. Isokinetic testing was utilized to measure peak torque at 60°/sec and 180°/sec. Correlations between isometric and isokinetic measures were evaluated using Spearman’s rho. RTD was compared between the involved and uninvolved limbs. Results The four-month measures of RTD 100 (r=.55, r=.45), RTD 200 (r=.63, r=.52), and peak isometric torque (r=.77, r=.64) were all significantly correlated with 60°/sec and 180°/sec isokinetic peak torque (p≤0.001), respectively. The involved limb rate of torque development was slower, and strength was lower than the uninvolved limb (p<0.001). Conclusions The hypotheses were supported as four-month isometric measures were moderately to strongly correlated to six-month isokinetic peak torque measures and the involved limb RTD was slower than the uninvolved limb. Incorporation of interventions focusing on development of force quickly is encouraged during rehabilitation. Level of Evidence 3b
Article
Full-text available
Impaired corticomotor function arising from altered intracortical and corticospinal pathways are theorized to impede muscle recovery following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) surgery, yet functional implications of centrally driven adaptations remain unclear. We aimed to assess relationships between quadriceps corticomotor and neuromechanical function after ACL surgery, and to compare with contralateral and control limbs. 16 individuals after primary, unilateral ACL surgery and 16 sex- and age-matched controls participated. Corticomotor function was assessed using transcranial magnetic stimulation, and quantified via active motor thresholds (AMT), short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI), and intracortical facilitation (ICF). Neuromechanical function was quantified via electromechanical delay, early and late-phase rate of torque development (RTD0–50, RTD100–200), coefficient of variation, maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) torque, and central activation ratio. We observed significant correlations in the ACL limbs between: AMT and RTD0–50 (r = − 0.513, p = 0.031), SICI and RTD100–200 (r = 0.501, p = 0.048), AMT and SICI (r = − 0.659, p = 0.010), AMT and ICF (r = 0.579, p = 0.031), RTD0–50 and MVIC (r = 0.504, p = 0.023), and RTD100–200 and MVIC (r = 0.680, p = 0.002). The ACL limbs demonstrated higher AMT compared to controls (44.9 ± 8.4 vs. 30.1 ± 8.2%, p < 0.001), and lesser MVIC torque (2.37 ± 0.52 vs. 2.80 ± 0.59 Nm/kg, p = 0.005) and RTD100–200 (6.79 ± 1.72 vs. 7.90 ± 1.98 Nm/kg/s, p = 0.006) compared to the contralateral limbs. Our findings indicate that lesser corticospinal excitability is associated with lesser early-phase RTD, and greater intracortical inhibition is associated with lesser late-phase RTD. These findings provide evidence of implications of altered intracortical and corticospinal pathways relative to the ability to rapidly generate quadriceps torque following ACL surgery.
Article
Full-text available
Muscle strength imbalances around the knee are often observed in athletes after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) surgery and hamstring muscle injury. This study examined three hamstrings-to-quadriceps (H:Q) strength ratio types (conventional, functional, and mixed) in thirteen female athletes with a history of hamstring injury, fourteen basketball players following ACL reconstruction and 34 controls. The conventional (concentric H:Q) peak torque ratio was evaluated at 120°·s−1 and 240°·s−1. The functional (eccentric hamstring to concentric quadriceps) torque ratio was evaluated at 120°·s−1. Finally, the mixed (eccentric hamstrings at 30°·s−1 to concentric quadriceps at 240°·s−1) torque ratio was calculated. Both ACL and the hamstring-injured groups showed a lower quadriceps and hamstrings strength compared with controls (p < 0.05). However, non-significant group differences in the H:Q ratio were found (p > 0.05). Isokinetic assessment of muscle strength may be useful for setting appropriate targets of training programs for athletes with a history of ACL surgery or hamstring strain. However, isokinetic evaluation of the H:Q ratio is not injury—specific and it does not vary between different methods of calculating the H:Q ratio.
Article
Full-text available
Background The anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is the most commonly operated ligament of the knee. Details on the top journals, universities, and authors on the topic would be helpful to identify the sources of information for clinical and research queries as well as to observe trends for future research and identify universities/authors of particular interest for training or to follow their research. Purpose To consolidate information from PubMed on the ACL from 1979 to 2018, spanning 40 years. Study Design Cross-sectional study. Methods A search of the PubMed database was conducted for the ACL, and 18,696 articles published over the past 40 years were analyzed for further details. These details included the number of publications per year, top 10 journals publishing on the ACL, top 10 first authors publishing articles on the ACL, and number of articles published with specific keywords. Data were also sought from the Scopus database regarding the top universities and countries publishing on the ACL. The coauthorship of articles and co-occurrence of terms in titles were also analyzed using VOSviewer. Results There was a steady increase in the yearly average number of publications from 1979 to 2018. The top journal and top author publishing on the ACL were The American Journal of Sports Medicine and Freddie H. Fu, respectively. The most articles published by a first author were by K. Donald Shelbourne. Time-based links of Dr Fu to other authors were represented as VOSviewer output. Most occurrences of specific keywords in the title were also studied and listed. The United States was the most published country, and 8 of the top 10 universities that published were from this country. Conclusion There has been a steady increase in the number of articles published in PubMed since 1979. It appears that interest on the topic of the ACL has not decreased or stabilized but rather increased significantly over the past few years. This article quantifies the increased interest and could act as a baseline for future studies to compare.
Article
Full-text available
Lower extremity musculoskeletal injuries are common in sport and exercise, and associated with increased risk of obesity and post-traumatic osteoarthritis (PTOA). Unlike other forms of osteoarthritis, PTOA is common at a younger age and associated with more rapid progression, which may impact career choices, long-term general health and reduce quality of life. Individuals who suffer an activity-related joint injury and present with abnormal joint morphology, elevated adiposity, weak musculature, or become physically inactive are at increased risk of PTOA. Insufficient exercise therapy or incomplete rehabilitation, premature return-to-sport and re-injury, unrealistic expectations, or poor nutrition may further elevate this risk. Delay in surgical interventions in lieu of exercise therapy to optimize muscle strength and neuromuscular control while addressing fear of movement to guarantee resumption of physical activity, completeness of rehabilitation before return-to-sport, education that promotes realistic expectations and self-management, and nutritional counseling are the best approaches for delaying or preventing PTOA.
Article
Objectives: To estimate the risk of clinically diagnosed knee osteoarthritis (OA) after different types of knee injuries in young adults. Methods: In a longitudinal cohort study based on population-based healthcare data from Skåne, Sweden, we included all persons aged 25-34 years in 1998-2007 (n=149 288) with and without diagnoses of knee injuries according to International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-10. We estimated the HR of future diagnosed knee OA in injured and uninjured persons using Cox regression, adjusted for potential confounders. We also explored the impact of type of injury (contusion, fracture, dislocation, meniscal tear, cartilage tear/other injury, collateral ligament tear, cruciate ligament tear and injury to multiple structures) on diagnosed knee OA risk. Results: We identified 5247 persons (mean (SD) age 29.4 (2.9) years, 67% men) with a knee injury and 142 825 persons (mean (SD) age 30.2 (3.0) years, 45% men) without. We found an adjusted HR of 5.7 (95% CI 5.0 to 6.6) for diagnosed knee OA in injured compared with uninjured persons during the first 11 years of follow-up and 3.4 (95% CI 2.9 to 4.0) during the following 8 years. The corresponding risk difference (RD) after 19 years of follow-up was 8.1% (95% CI 6.7% to 9.4%). Cruciate ligament injury, meniscal tear and fracture of the tibia plateau/patella were associated with greatest increase in risk (RD of 19.6% (95% CI 13.2% to 25.9%), 10.5% (95% CI 6.4% to 14.7%) and 6.6% (95% CI 1.1% to 12.2%), respectively). Conclusion: In young adults, knee injury increases the risk of future diagnosed knee OA about sixfold with highest risks found after cruciate ligament injury, meniscal tear and intra-articular fracture.
Article
Background: This updated systematic review reports data from 2009 on the prevalence, and risk factors, for knee osteoarthritis (OA) more than 10 years after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear. Methods: We systematically searched five databases (PubMed, EMBASE, AMED, Cinahl and SPORTDiscus) for prospective and retrospective studies published after 1 August 2008. Studies were included if they investigated participants with ACL tear (isolated or in combination with medial collateral ligament and/or meniscal injuries) and reported symptomatic and/or radiographic OA at a minimum of 10 years postinjury. We used a modified version of the Downs and Black checklist for methodological quality assessment and narrative synthesis to report results. The study protocol was registered in PROSPERO. Results: Forty-one studies were included. Low methodological quality was revealed in over half of the studies. At inclusion, age ranged from 23 to 38 years, and at follow-up from 31 to 51 years. Sample sizes ranged from 18 to 780 participants. The reported radiographic OA prevalence varied between 0% and 100% >10 years after injury, regardless of follow-up time. The studies with low and high methodological quality reported a prevalence of radiographic OA between 0%-100% and 1%-80%, respectively. One study reported symptomatic knee OA for the tibiofemoral (TF) joint (35%), and one study reported symptomatic knee OA for the patellofemoral (PF) joint (15%). Meniscectomy was the only consistent risk factor determined from the data synthesis. Conclusion: Radiographic knee OA varied between 0% and 100% in line with our previous systematic review from 2009. Symptomatic and radiographic knee OA was differentiated in two studies only, with a reported symptomatic OA prevalence of 35% for the TF joint and 15% for PF joint. Future cohort studies need to include measurement of symptomatic knee OA in this patient group. Prospero registration number: CRD42016042693.
Article
Objectives: To examine the immediate effects of prolonged patellar tendon vibration on quadriceps strength in anterior cruciate ligament reconstructed (ACLR) knees with bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB) grafts and non-BTB grafts, and healthy control knees. Design: Pretest-posttest design. Setting: Laboratory. Participants: Young adult participants were stratified into one of three groups: non-BTB graft (n = 25), BTB graft (n = 26), and controls without ACLR (n = 21). Main outcome measures: Maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) knee extension torque was measured at baseline and following a 20-min vibration intervention applied locally to the patellar tendon. Results: Our findings suggest there was no difference in the effects of vibration on knee extension torque between the three groups. Knee extension torque significantly increased (effect size = 0.52 [0.18 to 0.81]) from baseline to post-vibration across all three groups (0.30 ± 0.26 Nm/kg, 21.8 ± 20.0%). Both ACLR groups demonstrated significantly lower knee extension torque compared the control group. Conclusions: The vibration intervention had a net excitatory effect on quadriceps strength in all three groups and there were no differences in the magnitude of change between the three groups. Vibration could become a useful tool for enhancing quadriceps strength in ACLR and healthy knees.
Article
Objectives:The purpose of the current study was to compare the results of a progressive strength training protocol for soccer players after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with healthy controls, and to investigate the effects of the strength training protocol on peak quadriceps and hamstring muscle strength.Design:Between subjects design. Setting:Outpatient physical therapy facility. Participants:Thirty-eight amateur male soccer players after ACLR were included. Thirty age-matched amateur male soccer players served as control group. Main outcome measures:Quadriceps and hamstring muscle strength was measured at three time points during the rehabilitation. Limb symmetry index (LSI)>90% was used as cut-off criteria.Results:Soccer players after ACLR had no significant differences in peak quadriceps and hamstring muscle strength in the injured leg at 7 months after ACLR compared to the dominant leg of the control group. Furthermore, 65.8% of soccer players after ACLR passed LSI>90% at 10 months for quadriceps muscle strength. Conclusion:Amateur male soccer players after ACLR can achieve similar quadriceps and hamstring muscle strength at 7 months compared to healthy controls. These findings highlight the potential of progressive strength training in rehabilitation after ACLR that may mitigate commonly reported strength deficits.
Article
Objective To estimate knee osteoarthritis (OA) risk following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), meniscus or combined ACL and meniscus injury. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis. Data sources MEDLINE, Embase, SPORTDiscus, CINAHL and Web of Science until November 2018. Eligibility criteria for selecting studies Prospective or retrospective studies with at least 2-year follow-up including adults with ACL injury, meniscal injury or combined injuries. Knee OA was defined by radiographs or clinical diagnosis and compared with the contralateral knee or non-injured controls. Study appraisal and synthesis Risk of bias was assessed using the SIGN50 checklist. ORs for developing knee OA were estimated using random effects meta-analysis. Results 53 studies totalling ∼1 million participants were included: 185 219 participants with ACL injury, mean age 28 years, 35% females, 98% surgically reconstructed; 83 267 participants with meniscal injury, mean age 38 years, 36% females, 22% confirmed meniscectomy and 73% unknown; 725 362 participants with combined injury, mean age 31 years, 26% females, 80% treated surgically. The OR of developing knee OA were 4.2 (95% CI 2.2 to 8.0; I ² =92%), 6.3 (95% CI 3.8 to 10.5; I ² =95%) and 6.4 (95% CI 4.9 to 8.3; I ² =62%) for patients with ACL injury, meniscal injury and combined injuries, respectively. Conclusion The odds of developing knee OA following ACL injury are approximately four times higher compared with a non-injured knee. A meniscal injury and a combined injury affecting both the ACL and meniscus are associated with six times higher odds compared with a non-injured knee. Large inconsistency (eg, study design, follow-up period and comparator) and few high-quality studies suggest that future studies may change these estimates. Clinical relevance Patients sustaining a major knee injury have a substantially increased risk of developing knee OA, highlighting the importance of knee injury prevention programmes and secondary prevention strategies to prevent or delay knee OA development. PROSPERO registration number CRD42015016900
Article
Context: Poor quadriceps force control has been observed after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction but has not been examined after ACL injury. Whether adaptations within the central nervous system are contributing to these impairments is unknown. Objective: To examine quadriceps force control in individuals who had sustained a recent ACL injury and determine the associations between cortical excitability and quadriceps force control in these individuals. Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: Research laboratory. Patients or other participants: Eighteen individuals with a recent unilateral ACL injury (6 women, 12 men; age = 29.6 ± 8.4 years, height = 1.74 ± 0.07 m, mass = 76.0 ± 10.4 kg, time postinjury = 69.5 ± 42.5 days) and 18 uninjured individuals (6 women, 12 men; age = 29.2 ± 6.8 years, height = 1.79 ± 0.07 m, mass = 79.0 ± 8.4 kg) serving as controls participated. Main outcome measure(s): Quadriceps force control was quantified as the root mean square error between the quadriceps force and target force during a cyclical force-matching task. Cortical excitability was measured as the active motor threshold and cortical silent period. Outcome measures were determined bilaterally in a single testing session. Group and limb differences in quadriceps force control were assessed using mixed analyses of variance (2 × 2). Pearson product moment correlations were performed between quadriceps force control and cortical excitability in individuals with an ACL injury. Results: Individuals with an ACL injury exhibited greater total force-matching error with their involved (standardized mean difference [SMD] = 0.8) and uninvolved (SMD = 0.9) limbs than did controls (F1,27 = 11.347, P = .03). During the period of descending force, individuals with an ACL injury demonstrated greater error using their involved (SMD = 0.8) and uninvolved (SMD = 0.8) limbs than uninjured individuals (F1,27 = 4.941, P = .04). Greater force-matching error was not associated with any cortical excitability measures (P > .05). Conclusions: Quadriceps force control was impaired bilaterally after recent ACL injury but was not associated with selected measures of cortical excitability. The findings highlight a need to incorporate submaximal-force control tasks into rehabilitation and "prehabilitation," as the deficits were present before surgery.