A preview of this full-text is provided by Wiley.
Content available from Birth
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
Birth. 2020;47:409–417. wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/birt
|
409
© 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC
1
|
BACKGROUND
Fetal macrosomia is defined as birthweight of at least 4000g,
although classifications of >4500 g and >5000 g are also
used.1-4 Higher birthweight newborns are associated with
a number of negative labor and birth outcomes in planned
hospital births, including prolonged labor, genital tract lac-
erations, postpartum hemorrhage, neonatal birth trauma
Received: 30 April 2020
|
Revised: 3 September 2020
|
Accepted: 11 September 2020
DOI: 10.1111/birt.12506
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Fetal macrosomia in home and birth center births in the United
States: Maternal, fetal, and newborn outcomes
SabrinaPillai MPH1
|
MelissaCheyney PhD, LDM2
|
Courtney L.Everson PhD3
|
Marit L.Bovbjerg PhD, MS1
1College of Public Health and Human
Sciences, Oregon State University,
Corvallis, OR, USA
2College of Liberal Arts, Oregon State
University, Corvallis, OR, USA
3College of Health and Human Sciences,
Colorado State University, Fort Collins,
CO, USA
Correspondence
Sabrina Pillai, College of Public Health and
Human Sciences, Oregon State University,
101 Milam Hall, Corvallis, OR 97331,
USA.
Email: sabrina.pillai@oregonstate.edu
Funding information
This work was supported by Oregon
State University President’s Commission
on the Status of Women and NICHD/
NIH 5R03HD096094. MANA Stats data
collection was funded by the Foundation for
the Advancement of Midwifery.
Abstract
Background: Fetal macrosomia is associated with negative outcomes, although less
is known about how severities of macrosomia influence these outcomes. Planned
community births in the United States have higher rates of gestational age-adjusted
macrosomia than planned hospital births, providing a novel population to examine
macrosomia morbidity.
Methods: Maternal and neonatal outcomes associated with grade 1 (4000-4499g),
grade 2 (4500-4999g), and grade 3 (≥5000g) macrosomia were compared to nor-
mal birthweight newborns (2500-3999 g), using data from the MANA Statistics
Project—a registry of planned community births, 2012-2018 (n=68966). Outcomes
included perineal trauma, postpartum hemorrhage, cesarean birth, neonatal birth in-
jury, shoulder dystocia, neonatal respiratory distress, neonatal intensive care unit
(NICU) stay >24hours, and perinatal death. Logistic regressions controlled for par-
ity and mode of birth, obesity, gestational diabetes, and preeclampsia.
Results: Sixteen percent of the sample were grade 1 macrosomic, 3.3% were grade
2 macrosomic, and 0.4% were grade 3 macrosomic. Macrosomia grades 1-3 were
associated in a dose-response fashion with higher odds of all outcomes, compared to
non-macrosomia. The adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for postpar-
tum hemorrhage for grade 1, grade 2, and grade 3 macrosomia vs normal birthweight
were 1.75 (1.56-1.96), 2.12 (1.70-2.63), and 5.18 (3.47-7.74), respectively. Other
outcomes had similar patterns.
Discussion: The adjusted odds of negative outcomes increase as grade of macroso-
mia increases in planned community births; results are comparable with the pub-
lished literature. Pre-birth fetal weight estimation is imprecise; prenatal supports and
shared decision-making processes should reflect these complexities.
KEYWORDS
birthing centers, fetal macrosomia, home childbirth, pregnancy complications