Content uploaded by Harminder KAUR Gujral
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Harminder KAUR Gujral on Nov 22, 2020
Content may be subject to copyright.
SELF-CONFIDENCE A DEMEANOR TO EMOTIONAL
INTELLIGENCE
Dheeraj Upadhyay, Shivangi Talwar, Shivani Tiwari & Dr. Harminder Gujral (Faculty)
Amity University, Noida.
Abstract
Self-confidence is basically a competence which allows individuals to persist positive yet
sensible perspectives on themselves and their situations. Self-confident people have trust on their
capabilities, have an overall control when it comes to their lives, sensibly speaking, they will
have the option to do whatever they desire, plan, and want to anticipate. As per available
literature 55%-63% of youths are at low degree of emotional intelligence which brings about low
confidence.Emotional intelligence is defined as how an individual is able to manage, know and
further use the emotions in a positive way so that challenges can be overcome and effective
communication can take place along with empathizing with others. The research was conducted
on a sample of 157 individuals and the results demonstrated that emotional intelligence and self-
confidence are very important part of individuals’ satisfaction and happiness. Further the
obtained value of r 0.727 reflects there exists positive relationship when it comes between self-
confidence and emotional intelligence. The research is very relevant as it reflects that self-
confidence and emotional intelligence are important perimeters of personal and professional
success.
Keywords:
Self-confidence, Demeanor, Competence, Emotional Intelligence.
Introduction
As we adventure into the new age of humans, the word feeling has developed another
significance or meaning. The word emotion relates to "markedly stimulated or unsettled in
feeling or sensibilities (Goleman,1998). An individual is supposed to be called good at emotional
intelligence when he feels appropriate feeling in a legitimate circumstance and express it in a
legitimate amount.(Law KS et. al, 2004)
Over the time emotional intelligence has become intriguing subject of brain science also, and a
lot of studies have been carried out for emotional intelligence. In 1990 Mayer and Salovey
presented emotional intelligence concept and as per them emotional intelligence alludes
psychological capacity that people haverelated with feelings so that thoughts can be
improvedalong with advancing scholarly furthermore, enthusiastic development. Numerous
analysts have discovered person contrasts in enthusiastic knowledge (Mayer et. al, 2008). The
ISSN/eISSN: 0889-6348
http://www.proteusresearch.org/ Page No: 120
PROTEUS JOURNAL
VOLUME 11 ISSUE 11 2020
focal point behind various researches is regarding the investigation of what capacities emotions
hold as the predictor of mental prosperity, wellbeing and social working.
EI can be characterized as the capacity to accurately comprehend, assess what's more, impart
feelings (Heck et. al., 2008) People who can understand and direct their feelings can for the most
part hold a greater perspective on life furthermore, with several experiencescomes better
prosperity mentally when compared with those who are not able to do so (Mayer et. al.,1995).
At the point when an individual can acknowledge his/her shortcoming and deficiencies and all
the while perceives his/her qualities and positive characteristics, the individual will encounter
solid self-esteem and high confidence. Schutte et al., (2002) give proof that a correlation exists
when it comes betweenemotional intelligence and confidence of an individual.
Also, emotional intelligence is a basic factor to flourish the capacities of individuals so that they
can achieve success in their life, which is credited to enthusiastic and mental health (Bar et. al.,
2006). Moreover, the individual segment is significant in emotional intelligence, which
demonstrates as an individual' capacity to the mindfulness and controlling of feelings, including
confidence, mindfulness, assertiveness, independence, and self-realization.
Research studies have showed that females will in general be more passionate furthermore, warm
seeing as compared tomale counterpart, so they are considered as more emotionally intelligent
(Duckett et.al., 1989) Society plays a major role in making ladies all the more genuinely shrewd.
In addition, greater emotional intelligence among younger girls can likewise be portrayed with
their character attributes (Sandhu P. et al., 1999). Young ladies are required to be additionally
cautioning, vehement and more socially active and are raised in the manners which increases
their level of emotionally intelligence (Tapia ML et. al., 1999).
Talking about self-confidence it is a disposition which permits people to have positive yet
sensible perspectives on themselves and their circumstances. With the help of self-confidence
people are able to have faith in their capacities, have an overall feeling that yes, they can take
control of their lives, and accept that, with self-confidence they will have the option to do
whatever they want whatever they wish, plan, and anticipate. Self-confidence is key to great
mental alteration, the happiness of an individual and powerful working in both youngsters and
grown-ups. The term self-confidence is utilized to allude to person's judgment about what they
think of themselves. People with over all high self-ideas are sure about their capacities to achieve
their objectives, scholarly ability and have better relationship with guardians and friends. On the
other hand, people with low self-confidence in general be troubled about voicing disagreeable or
surprising thoughts and abstain from standing out from the crowd.
Having self-confidence doesn't mean that individualscan do everything. Self-assured people have
goalswhich are practical. In any event, when their goals are not met, they stay on being more
positive and hold the right attitude.
ISSN/eISSN: 0889-6348
http://www.proteusresearch.org/ Page No: 121
PROTEUS JOURNAL
VOLUME 11 ISSUE 11 2020
When it comes to Self-confidence it isn't really an overall trademark which swarms all parts of
an individual's life. Normally, there are few aspects in lives of people where they feel very
certain or confident, e.g., scholastics, games, while simultaneously they do not feel at all sure
about different regions, e.g., individual appearance, social connections. Self-confidence makes
you believe in yourself and your capacities, a psychological disposition of trusting or depending
on yourself. Confidence of a person is now and then likened with opportunity from question;
anyway, when confidence is required especially when the result is doubtful, so confidence makes
you feel stable even with vulnerability even though one do not know what the result will be.
A mainstream expression of Swami Vivekananda "Stand up, be intense, be solid. Assume the
entire liability on your shoulders and realize that you are the maker of your own
predetermination. All the quality and aid you need is inside you. In this manner, make your own
future."
Review of Literature
The timid feelings which are a part of our everyday lives and we accept and listen to them
regularly without acknowledging them should never be overlooked. ~Vincent Van Gogh, 1889.
Emotion as a word can be referred to as the feeling which consists of the psychological changes including
articulation conduct but on the other side analysts, scholars, researchers etc. have a different opinion and
develop different hypothesis which has increased the area of interest in this field
. To understand the
supreme human being theologists study emotions or how emotions are controlled whereas in the
opinion of the therapist’s emotions can sometimes lead individual to be against the
society.Psychologists who are very appropriate in understanding the emotions have a different
opinion and they always wish to understand the root cause and advancement of emotions. Now
with the research in this area the understanding of scientists in relation to emotions have been
changed from where they accepted emotions can be very exasperating to the point where they
now feel and accept that emotions always occur because of a certain reason and they both are
interrelated or associated and almost every part that Scientists had moved from the stage where
they accepted that feelings are troublesome, to a stage where they saw that feeling and reason are
interconnected and that the greater part of theevents, discernment or thinking goes before
sentiments. Emotions and Information known to be different and separated areashave now
composed in the new field "Comprehension and influence" (Mayer, 2001)
The ability to understand others as well as one’s own assumptions and emotions, identify the
difference between them and use this information to control individual thinking and action.
(Salovey and Mayer, 1990) John Mayer and Peter Salovey in 1990, for the first time used the
word “Emotional Intelligence” in their writing notwithstanding the way that the field of energetic
information is a truly new one(Cherniss, 2000),this thought got massively notable because it
explains and outfits evidence on people with a fair Intelligence Quotient on occasion misfire and
ISSN/eISSN: 0889-6348
http://www.proteusresearch.org/ Page No: 122
PROTEUS JOURNAL
VOLUME 11 ISSUE 11 2020
the people those who never went to school or got dropped from it, considered moronic continue
to transform amazingly in their respective areas (Goleman, 1995).
The four- bifurcation model developed by Mayer and Salovey’s of Emotional Intelligence laid
accentuation observation, enthusiastic osmosis, comprehension and the board (Mayer, Salovey,
and Caruso, 2004), while the characteristics on which Reuven Bar-On (2002) conquers are the
enthusiastic mindfulness, resistant to stress, confidence, satisfaction, and so forth as those that
choose the enthusiastic insight of an individual. Goleman (1998) then again calls attention to
passionate self-mindfulness, discretion, sympathy, critical thinking, refereeing, and authority
including the qualities which help to build up a smart human. The blended capacity model
proposed by Reuven Bar-On underscores on how the character attributes impact a person’s
general prosperity and Goleman’s model spotlights on working environment achievement (Stys
and Brown, 2004).
The four-branch model of Mayer and Salovey’scomprehends enthusiastic insight as a
psychological capacity and presents the four levels through which an individual turns out to be
sincerely astute. Contrary to this model, another model was prepared and proposed by the
researchers Reuven Bar-On (2002) and Goleman on blended capacity that incorporates character
qualities too. The enthusiastic insight model which was proposed by Bar-On (2002) relates to the
prospective for accomplishment and implementation, rather than execution or accomplishment
itself, which includes cycle that is result-oriented. It endeavors to recognize in an individual the
idle capacity of being sincerely wise. `
They are like Mayer and Salovey’s model on passionate mindfulness, restraint, self-articulation,
and sympathy, however alongside these viewpoints, the testing of the reality which was proposed
by Bar-On that identifies the relation among the experience and the real idea behind the article,
resilience to the stress, including solidarity of being cheerful with idealistic evenness and
difficulty. Goleman’s model goes amiss somewhat as he incorporates hierarchical mindfulness,
initiative, cooperation and joint effort alongside mindfulness, restraint and compassion, as his
attention is on working environment achievement.
In the late 20
th
century, there was a swing increasing the positive impact of emotions in an
individual’s life. The reason discovered behind this swing was the was the immense dependency
accumulated for the acumen in return which lead to the absence of understanding in the
individual’s own and social life relations (Mathews et. al. 2004). An individual scholarly
recognition got begrudged, and yet was viewed with scorn. He was turning into a disparagement
including the TV which personified the character as a “nerd” and in return he came up short on
even the essential social abilities and was never on top of the real world (Zeidner and Mathews,
2000).
ISSN/eISSN: 0889-6348
http://www.proteusresearch.org/ Page No: 123
PROTEUS JOURNAL
VOLUME 11 ISSUE 11 2020
When the population was undergoing brutality with a very small incitement at that point of time
the hypothesis on the subject of Emotional Intelligence came into play and that was the suitable
time when this could be introduced to the general public. In a book which is referred to as
“Raising an Emotionally Intelligent Child”written byJohn Gottman in 1997 where he stated
about the issues which youngsters face and what approach they follow..
As the enthusiasm related to expression was founded long before but the inside it has currently
focused in the minds of the population came from the structure which lead the foundations from
the build of Mayor and Salovey in 1990. (Leuner, 1966, as referred to in Petrides, 2011). It was a
very innovative idea as whenever depicted it revealed a large amount of information. But the
amount of fame which the hypothesis has received is because of the book written by Daniel
Goleman in respect to the subject “Emotional Intelligence and why it is more important than IQ”
(1995).
The first person who applied the idea of Emotional Intelligence in relation to business was done
by Goleman (1998) in his review article of Harvard Business Review. A high intelligent quotient
accompanied by the solid information were the two important minimum capabilities that was
required by the person when he is entering into the business environment (Goleman
1998).Intelligent quotient in addition to emotional intelligence can help an individual to get a
secured position in his job and to be very effective in the corporate business
environment(Emmerling and Goleman, 2003; Cherniss et. al. 1998; Boyatzis and Oosten, 2002)
A questionnaire developed by Richard Boyatzis(1994), on the self-assessmenthelped to analyze
the skills and the capabilities which were required by the employers, top management. A
different model which was referred to as theEmotional Competency Inventory (ECI) was built up
by Goleman acted as an instrument which gave an insight to the individual HR department and
also the friend appraisals on enthusiasm and its progression (Stys and Brown, 2004).
Emotional Competence Inventory i.e. ECI is dynamic, powerful as well as controversial because
it gives anoverview of self-evaluation for a person and organization, on the other hand, it caters
to an issue of dependability. Therefore, a person’s evaluation of himself being appreciated is
questionable, with respect to a response in view of his presumptionsand enthusiastic capabilities.
A presumptuous person might comprehend himself as sincerely skilled even though a person low
on confidence may underestimate his abilities. As Grubb and McDaniel (2007) watch, the
blended models are inimical to pretend as they are defenseless andconsist of “non-psychological
dimensions”, utilizing self-report parameters. Equivalently, it is assumed that the element of ECI
cover within any event in four of the Big Five-character measurements and other cognitive ideas
are inspirational and initiative (Matthews et. al., 2002; Van Rooy&Viswesvaran, 2004, as
referred to in Conte, 2005). Not many “peer explored evaluations of the undeviating aspect and
illicitness of ECI have been embodied and proclaimed” (Conte, 2005), it is ideal to abandon
thevalidity of development to future exploration and study.
ISSN/eISSN: 0889-6348
http://www.proteusresearch.org/ Page No: 124
PROTEUS JOURNAL
VOLUME 11 ISSUE 11 2020
Self-Confidence is having faith in your own caliber to carry out an activity and get an outcome.
(Bandura, 1977; Chemers, et al., 2000). For instance, to have conviction is to look towards the
data that help buy a choice illustrating data search fearlessness. This peculiarkind of fearlessness
is a unique connection with confidence;however,it could potentially grow autonomously like an
outcome of encounters identified with that particular errand (Bandura, 1977, 1988; Park and
Crocker, 2005). Individuals understand and embrace choices, by increasing explicit input
regarding their capacities, along these lines build up the convictions in those capacities, with
those convictions depicted as fearlessness (Park et al., 2007).
Self-Confidence is certifiably by no means a persuasive viewpoint without anyone else.
However,it’s a judgment in regard to thedexterity for achieving some objective, and, along these
lines, it is ought to contemplate an extensive conceptualization of inspiration that provides the
purpose & target setting. Kanfer (1990a) presents a case of the psychologically driven structure
of inspiration for such a conversation. Self-Confidence allows individuals to convince others to
attempt activities, inclusive of buying choices, has been a zone of enthusiasm for quite a few
years in the social brain science, advertising
.
The terms such as, "fearlessness," "self-adequate," "recognized capability," "discern fitness" etc
are used to predict an individual's capacity to achieve particular degree of execution. Bandura
(1977) uses "self-adequacy" expression to display the conviction an individual is having the
option to execute a specific task efficiently (e.g., facing a numerical statement) to obtain
particular result (e.g., educator acknowledgment) and, in this manner, can be taken as
conditionally explicit self-confidence.1 Self-viability isn't worried about a person's abilities, yet,
rather, with the decisions of what an individual can achieve with those aptitudes (Bandura,
1986). Bandura (1986, 1990) recognizes "self-viability" and "fearlessness": self-assurance
contributes to immovability however doesn't signal towards its heading; self-adequacy remarks
the selection of an objection.
A few terms identified with fearlessness are at times mistaken for the build. A few authors (e.g.,
Kirsch, 1985) made attempt to actualize Bandura's (1977) idea about self-assurance (self-
viability) as an anticipation build. Bandura recognizes decisions of one’s adequacy right from the
anticipation develop in hope by-esteem hypotheses (e.g., Fishbein and Ajzen, 1975; Triandis,
1977): fearlessness is a result of individual capability to perform at a particular level; hopes
anticipated from results from a given exertion degree. Generally, certainty desires are worried
about convictions individual ability and result desires are worried about convictions about
individualsituation.
Social self-assurance, now and again named social self-viability, is strong confidence in
individualability to socialize or potentially maintaining relational tie ups (Bandura, 1993; Gecas,
1989; Paridon et al., 2006; Wright, 1975). Individuals having less social fearlessness will in
general be much helpless to others impact (Gecas, 1989; Pool et al., 1998). Thus,shows less
degrees of certainty put an individual in subordinate situation with other people, and
ISSN/eISSN: 0889-6348
http://www.proteusresearch.org/ Page No: 125
PROTEUS JOURNAL
VOLUME 11 ISSUE 11 2020
consequently follow-up conduct of others trying to be publically acknowledged. The converse
got less consideration (Chelminski and Coulter, 2007; Soyeon, 1996). How more significant
stages of public self-assurance may carry an individual to rise to characteristic pioneer having a
capacity to impact individual choices stays unveiled.
Social Confidence depends upon that a significant function is assumed in the development of
characteristic conclusion pioneers who can affect the decision of friends. Fearless individuals are
generally more propelled when it comes to embracing the conduct whenever they are quite sure
about it. It comes from the conviction that the difficulties can be tackled by them which are
shown by the conduct. (Chemers, et al., 2000; Schunk, 1990). In such situation, social
fearlessness will progress individuals about being more friendly with other individuals around.
Thus, individuals will have the conviction that the social associations can be dealt by them,
adequately managing the good and bad incidents that ordinarily come up at the time of social
trades. Friendlier individuals are able to make more social bonding in a companion bunch as
compare to others during a gathering, expanding thecapacity to impact every individual in the
gathering with the help of social contact (Berndt, 2002). By this their buy conduct will be more
obvious, also conceivably much alluring and copied by everyone around them, because it
marksgreater social situation at gathering. Not exclusively can greater self-assurance propel an
individual to participate in a conduct all the more frequently, research has discovered they all the
more adequately deal with their conduct along with time (Sanna and Pusecker, 1994;
Zimmerman et al., 1992). An individual having more noteworthy social fearlessness will have
the option for a social setting survey and comprehend the situation inside. The appraisal might
not really be coordinated for accomplishing impact, yet is probably going to bring about it. An
individual with more prominent social self-assurance will in general invest more energy and
mental assets understanding the more extensive ramifications of their activities and overseeing
outside elements that can impact their individual social achievement (Bandura, 1990; Sanna and
Pusecker, 1994). Fearlessness drives individuals to zero in compared to their own capacities, as
they realize, they possess the capacities and there is no need to create them (Bandura, 1990).
Fearlessness consequently gives the chance to individuals to appropriately survey the social
setting around them, driving individuals to participate in the social conduct which are adequate
and engaging companions, finally to settle on choices which are more socially worthy and are
probably going to be imitatedby other individuals.
The adverse-impacts of less confidence likewise do influence the impact of an individual on
his/her friends. Individuals encountering less self-assurance along with an undertaking are found
to play out the assigned work all the much more unpredictably (Bandura, 1993; Bouffard-
Bouchard, 1990). An individual having less social self-assurance, with related inconsistent social
conduct, will be quite less unsurprising to everyone. Although unusual or an unpredictable
individual is probably not going to fabricate or support incredible degrees of relational impact.
Effective progressing towards good social relations require constant effortsor steady upkeep for
maintaining them (Carstensen, 1993; Gaine and Guardia, 2009; Peirce et al., 2000). Absence of
ISSN/eISSN: 0889-6348
http://www.proteusresearch.org/ Page No: 126
PROTEUS JOURNAL
VOLUME 11 ISSUE 11 2020
fruitful friend relationships, a result of less social confidence, tiny open door is accessible to
companions so as to be affected or when it comes to buying choices whether watched and
copied.
Other adverse-impact of lessself-confidence emerges from its bonding with the authority an
individual feels over one's life. People with less fearlessness will in general consider them to be
as dependent upon outer powers, with these outside powers being of more noteworthy effect on
personal choices (Coffeea et al., 2009; Gilbert and Malone, 1995). These outside powers decide
how fruitful theendeavors are and not considering the own capacity (Gist and Mitchell, 1992).
Inside social settings people with less fearlessness can consider them to be much dependent upon
the choices of other individuals, and consequently they will be more averse to endeavor to
impact everyone. Although this doesn't furnish strong proof that individual withgreater self-
assurance will apply that power on the social setting it dorecommends that a connection between
greater fearlessness and more noteworthy relational impact is likely.
Research Methodology
The Study Objectives
:
To evaluate Self-Confidence level in the sample population.
To evaluate Emotional Intelligence level in consideration of all 5 competencies.
To evaluate what relationship exists between Self-Confidence and Emotional Intelligence
considering the sample population.
Sample Size: Total Sample size is 157.
Sample Design: Non- Probability Convenience Sampling.
Sample Area: India
Data Analysis
Descriptive and inferential data analysis was done using SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social
Sciences). The analysis of the collected data was done using Mean and Pearson Product
Correlation Coefficient.
To evaluate the level of Self-confidence and Emotional Intelligence in the
participantsDescriptive Statistics was applied. Whilst to determine what relationship exists
between Emotional Intelligence and Self-ConfidenceWhilst Pearson Correlation was applied.
ISSN/eISSN: 0889-6348
http://www.proteusresearch.org/ Page No: 127
PROTEUS JOURNAL
VOLUME 11 ISSUE 11 2020
1. Level of Self-Confidence in the sample population:
Mean
4.0064
4.1677
4.3397
3.9935
3.9285
4.1346
3.7070
3.8645
4.0064
4.5909
Standard
Error
0.0650
0.0632
0.0541
0.0741
0.0731
0.0744
0.0757
0.0813
0.0694
0.0484
Median
4
4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5
Mode 4 4 5 5 4 5 4 4 4 5
Standard
Deviation
0.8098
0.7880
0.6767
0.9262
0.9082
0.9303
0.9490
1.0134
0.8641
0.6008
Sample
Variance
0.6558
0.6210
0.4580
0.8580
0.8249
0.8656
0.9007
1.0269
0.7467
0.3609
Range
4
4 2 4 4 4 4 4 4 2
N 157 157 157 157 157 157 157 157 157 157
Mean Total: Sum of all Means/No. of Questions; 40.7392/10 = 4.07392
Interpretation
Table 1 depicts the Mean value for each question asked with respect to Self- Confidence. To
evaluate the level of Self-Confidence, responses were segregated according to the score range i.e.
< 2 (Low on Self-Confidence)
< 3 (Below Average on Self-Confidence)
3-4 (Good/Above Average Self-Confidence)
4-5 (High Self Confidence)
Thus, according to the analysis the Self-Confidence of sample population is 4.07392 i.e. the
Confidence level is high.
2. Level of Emotional Intelligence in the sample population:
Descriptive Self- Managing Motivating Empathy Social Emotional
ISSN/eISSN: 0889-6348
http://www.proteusresearch.org/ Page No: 128
PROTEUS JOURNAL
VOLUME 11 ISSUE 11 2020
Statistics awareness emotions oneself skills Intelligence
Mean
12.8512 10.8659 11.8315 12.0778 11.88
59.8841
Standard
Error
0.2107
0.2495
0.23336
0.22822
0.23954
1.1612
Median 13
12 12 12 12
61
Mode 15
11 14 14 14
68
Standard
Deviation
2.6134
3.1011
2.8963
2.8337
2.9731
14.4176
Sample
Variance
2.3253
3.2409
2.8116
2.6781
2.9506
14.0065
Range 11
12 11 12 12
58
N 154
155 155 154 156
157
Interpretation
To check the level of EI, the above table was interpreted on the basis of score chart was given in
the standardized questionnaire.
Following are the score range:
15-34 (Low Emotional Intelligence level)
35-55 (Moderate Emotional Intelligence level)
56-75 (High Emotional Intelligence level)
Table 2 depicts the Mean value of EI which is 59.88 that lies in the range of 56-75. Thus, the
sample population is emotionally intelligent considering all the competencies.
3. Relationship between Self-Confidence and Emotional Intelligence by Pearson
Correlation Coefficient:
Correlations
Self-
Confidence
Emotional
Intelligence
Self-Confidence Pearson Correlation 1
.727
**
Sig. (2-tailed)
.000
N 157
157
Emotional
Intelligence
Pearson Correlation .727
**
1
Sig. (2-tailed) .000
N 157
157
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
ISSN/eISSN: 0889-6348
http://www.proteusresearch.org/ Page No: 129
PROTEUS JOURNAL
VOLUME 11 ISSUE 11 2020
Interpretation
The data was also analysed to check what relationship exists between Self-Confidence and EI.
From obtained value of r 0.727 significant at< 0.01. reflects strong relationship between Self-
Confidence and Emotional Intelligence.
Discussion & Conclusion
The research was done so as to examine the Self-Confidence, Emotional Intelligence levelsand
their relationship in the sample population.
The first objective of the research was to evaluate Self-Confidence level in the sample
population.It was confirmed that Self-Confidence level in the population is high which
indicates that the people have trust on themselves and that they are aware about the
strengths and weaknesses by having a positive attitude and sense of acceptance towards
their own capabilities.
The second objective evaluates Emotional Intelligence level in consideration of all the 5
competencies. The study demonstrated that people are high on Emotional awareness and
management. The self-motivation, empathy and social skills levels were also confirmed
to be high which reflectsthat people are cognizant, empathetic and mindful if it’s down to
their values, goals, choices etc.
The third objectivewas to evaluate what relationship exists between Self-Confidence and
Emotional Intelligence considering the sample population.Also, the relationship between
the Self-Confidence and EI was identified through SPSS. The analysis illustrated r =
0.727, significant on < 0.01showed a strong, significant and linear relationshipwhen it
comes between the Self-Confidence and Emotional Intelligence.
Thus, by the results obtained it can be easily concluded that self-confidence is a demeanor to
Emotional Intelligence.Hence, the training should be providedon self-confidence and emotional
skills at every step which will be helpful to give a positive progress in life and will definitely
affect the future employment, and social performance in the workplace.
ISSN/eISSN: 0889-6348
http://www.proteusresearch.org/ Page No: 130
PROTEUS JOURNAL
VOLUME 11 ISSUE 11 2020
References
1.
Bandura, A. 1977. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change.
Psychological Review 84(2): 191-215.
2.
Bandura, A. 1988 Self-efficacy conception of anxiety. Anxiety Research 1:77-98
3.
Bandura, A. 1988. Organisational Applications of Social Cognitive Theory. Australian
Journal of Management 13(2): 275-302
4.
Bandura, A. 1990 Perceived self-efficacy in the exercise of personal agency. Journal of
Applied Sport Psychology 2:128-163 .
5.
Bandura, A. 1993. Perceived Self-Efficacy in Cognitive Development and Functioning.
Educational Psychologist 28(2): 117-148..
6.
Bar-On R. The Bar-On model of emotional-social intelligence (ESI)Psicothema.
2006;18(Suplemento):13–25
7.
Bar-On, R. (2002). Bar-On Emotional Quotient Inventory (EQ-I): Technical Manual.
Toronto, Canada: Multi-Health System
8.
Berndt, T.J. 2002. Friendship Quality and Social Development. Current Directions in
Psychological Science 11(1):7-10.
9.
Bouffard-Bouchard, T. 1990.Influence of Self-Efficacy on Performance in a Cognitive
Task. Journal of Social Psychology 130(3): 353-363.
10.
Boyatzis, R.E. &Oosten, E. V. (2002). Developing emotionally intelligent organizations.
In Roderick Millar (ed.), International Executive Development Programmes, 7th Edition.
London: Kogan Page Publishers
11.
Boyatzis, R.E. (1994). Stimulating self-directed change: A required MBA course called
Managerial Assessment and Development, Journal of Management Education, 18(3),
304-32Branch. Correctional Service of Canada
12.
Carstensen, L.L. 1993. Motivation for Social Contact across the Life Span. In J. E.
Jacobs (Ed.), Developmental Perspectives on Motivation(Vol. 40). Nebraska: University
of Nebraska Press.
13.
Chelminski, P., Coulter, R.A. 2007. On Market Mavens and Consumer Self-Confidence:
A Cross Cultural Study. Psychology and Marketing 24(1): 69-91.
14.
Chemers, M.M., Watson, C.B., May, S.T. 2000. Dispositional Affect and Leadership
Effectiveness: A Comparison of Self-Esteem, Optimism, and Efficacy. Personality and
Social Psychology Bulletin 26(3): 267-277.
15.
Cherniss, C. (2000). Emotional intelligence: What it is and why it matters. Paper
presented at the Annual Meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational
Psychology, New Orleans, LA, April 15, 2000.
16.
Cherniss, C., Goleman, D., Emmerling, R., Cowan, K & Adler, M. (1998). Bringing
Emotional Intelligence to the Workplace. A Technical Report Issued by the
ISSN/eISSN: 0889-6348
http://www.proteusresearch.org/ Page No: 131
PROTEUS JOURNAL
VOLUME 11 ISSUE 11 2020
Consortium for Research on Emotional Intelligence in Organizations. Available
http://www.eiconsortium.org
17.
Coffeea, P., Reesb, T., Haslamc, S. A. 2009. Bouncing back from failure: The
interactive impact of perceived controllability and stability on self-efficacy beliefs and
future task performance. Journal of Sports Sciences 27(11): 1117-1124.Page 12
18.
Conte, M. J. (2005). A review and ctritique of emotional intelligence measures. Journal
of Organizational Behavior. 26, 433–440.
19.
Duckett E, Raffaelli M, Richards MH (1989) “Taking care”: Maintaining the self and the
home in early adolescence. J Youth Adolesc 18: 549-565.
20.
Emmerling, R. J. & Goleman, D. (2003). Emotional Intelligence: Issues and Common
Misunderstandings. Issues in Emotional Intelligence, [On-line serial], 1(1). Available
http://www.eiconsortium.org
21.
Fishbein, M., and I. Ajzen 1975 Belief Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An
Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.
22.
Gaine, G.S., Guardia, J.G.L. 2009. The unique contributions of motivations to maintain a
relationship and motivations toward relational activities to relationship well-being.
Motivation and Emotion 33(2): 184-202
23.
Gecas, V. 1989. The social psychology of self-efficacy. Annual Review of Sociology
15: 291-316.
24.
Gilbert, D. T., Malone, P. S. 1995. The Correspondence Bias. Psychological Bulletin
117(1): 21-38.
25.
Gist, M. E., Mitchell, T. R. 1992. Self-Efficacy: A Theoretical Analysis of Its
Determinants and Malleability. Academy of Management Review 17(2): 183-211.
26.
Goleman , D. ( 1995 ). Emotional intelligence: Why it can matter more than IQ. New
York: Bantam
27.
Goleman Working with emotional intelligence. New York. Bantom books; 1998
28.
Goleman, D. (1998). Emotional intelligence. New York: Bantam.
29.
Goleman, D. (1998). What makes a leader? Harvard Business Review. 76,93–102.
30.
Gottman, J., &Declaire, J. (1997). Raising an emotionally intelligent child: The
heart of parenting. New York: Simon & Schuster.
31.
Grubb III, L. W., McDaniel, M. A. (2007). The Fakability of Bar-On’s Emotional
Quotient Inventory Short Form: Catch Me if You Can. Human Performance, 20(1), 43–
59
32.
Heck GL, Oudsten BL (2008) Emotional intelligence: Relationship to stress,health, and
well-being. In: A Vingerhoets, I Nyklicek& J Denollet (Eds.), Emotion regulation.
Springer, New York, NY.
33.
Kanfer, F.H. 1990a Motivation and individual differences in learning: An integration of
developmental differential and cognitive perspectives. Learning and Individual
Differences 2:219-237 .
ISSN/eISSN: 0889-6348
http://www.proteusresearch.org/ Page No: 132
PROTEUS JOURNAL
VOLUME 11 ISSUE 11 2020
34.
Kirsch, I. 1985 Self-efficacy and expectancy: Old wine with new labels. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology 49:824-830 .
35.
Law KS, Wong CS, Song LJ (2004) The construct and criterion validity of emotional
intelligence and its potential utility for management studies. Journal of Applied
Psychology 80: 483-496.
36.
Luthans, F., Peterson, S. J. 2002. Employee engagement and manager self-efficacy:
Implications for managerial effectiveness and development. Journal of Management
Development 21(5/6): 376-387.
37.
Matthews, G., Zeidner, M., Roberts, R. D. (2004). Emotional Intelligence: Science and
Myth. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The
38.
Mayer JD, Roberts RD, Barsade SG (2008) Human abilities: Emotional intelligence.
Annu Rev Psychol 59: 507-536.
39.
Mayer JD, Salovey P (1995) Emotional intelligence and the construction and regulation
of feelings. Applied and Preventive Psychology 4: 197-208.
40.
Mayer, J.D., Salovey, P & Caruso, D.R. (2004). Emotional intelligence: Theory,
findings, and implications. Psychological Inquiry, 15(3), 197-215.
41.
Mayer, J. D. (2001). A field guide for emotional intelligence. In J. Ciarrochi& J. P.
Forgas& J. D. Mayer (Eds.), Emotional intelligence and everday life. (pp. 3-24). New
York: Psychology Press.
MIT Press. pp. 3-29
42.
Paridon, T.J., Carraher, S., Carraher, S. 2006. The Income Effect in Personal Shopping
Value, Consumer Self-Confidence, and Information Sharing (Word of Mouth
Communication) Research .Academy of Marketing Studies Journal 10(2): 107-124
43.
Park, L.E., Crocker, J. 2005. Interpersonal Consequences of Seeking Self-Esteem.
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 31(11): 1587-1598
44.
Park, L.E., Crocker, J., Kiefer, A.K. 2007. Contingencies of Self-Worth, Academic
Failure, and Goal Pursuit. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 33(11): 1503-
1517.
45.
Peirce, R.S., Frone, M.R., Russell, M., Cooper, M.L., Mudar, P. 2000. A longitudinal
model of social contact, social support, depression, and alcohol use. Health
Psychology 19(1): 28-38.
46.
Petrides, K. V. (2011). Ability and trait emotional intelligence. In Chamorro-Premuzic,
T., Furnham, A., & von Stumm, S. (Eds.), The Blackwell-Wiley Handbook of
Individual Differences. New York: Wiley.
47.
Pool, G.J., Wood, W., Leck, K. 1998. The Self-Esteem Motive in Social Influence:
Agreement with valued majorities and disagreement with derogated minorities. Journal
of Personality and Social Psychology 75(4): 967-975.
48.
Prevalence of adolescents in world (cited 18 May 2013). Available from:ht t p: / /w e b.
unf p a. org /focus /india /facet of ace /docs/adolescentsprofile.pdf
ISSN/eISSN: 0889-6348
http://www.proteusresearch.org/ Page No: 133
PROTEUS JOURNAL
VOLUME 11 ISSUE 11 2020
49.
Salovey, P., & Mayer, J. D. ( 1990 ). Emotional intelligence. Imagination, Cognition,
and Personality, 9 , 185 – 211.
50.
Sandhu P, Mehrotra (1999) Time pattern of female students with special reference to
leisure time activities. Ind J of Social Res 40: 285-296.
51.
Sanna, L.J., Pusecker, P.A. 1994. Self-Efficacy, Valence of Self-Evaluation, and
Performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 20(1): 82-92
52.
Schunk, D.H. 1990. Goal Setting and Self-Efficacy During Self-Regulated Learning.
Educational Psychologist 25(1): 71-86.
53.
Schutte NS,Malouff, JM, Simunek M, Hollander S, McKenley J. Characteristic
emotional intelligence and emotional well-being. Cognition and Emotion. 2002;
16:769–86.
54.
Schutte, Malouff, Hall, Hagerty, Cooper, Golden and Dornheim. Development and
validation of a measure of emotional intelligence. Personality and Individual
Differences.1998; 25: 167-77
55.
Schyns, B., Sczesny, S. 2010. Leadership attributes valence in self-concept and
occupational self-efficacy. Career Development International 15(1): 78-92
56.
Stys, Y., & Brown, S. L. (2004). A review of the emotional intelligence literature and
implications for corrections. Research
57.
Tapia ML (1999) A study of the relationships of the emotional intelligence inventory
(intelligence tests). Dissert, Abst, Int.
58.
Triandis, H.C. 1977 Interpersonal Behavior . Belmont, Calif.: Brooks/Cole.
59.
Van Rooy, D. L., Viswesvaran, C., &Pluta, P. (2005). An evaluation of construct
validity: What is this thing called emotional intelligence? Human Performance, 18, 445-
462
60.
Wright, P. 1975. Factors Affecting Cognitive Resistance in Advertising. Journal of
Consumer Research 2(1) 1-9.
61.
Zeidner, M., & Matthews, G. (2000). Personality and Intelligence. In R.J.Sternberg (ed.),
Handbook of human intelligence (2
nd
ed., pp 581-610). New York: Cambridge University
Press
62.
Zimmerman, B.J., Bandura, A., Martinez-Pons, M. 1992. Self-Motivation for
Academic Attainment: The Role of Self-Efficacy Beliefs and Personal Goal Setting.
American Educational Research Journal 29(3): 663-676.
ISSN/eISSN: 0889-6348
http://www.proteusresearch.org/ Page No: 134
PROTEUS JOURNAL
VOLUME 11 ISSUE 11 2020
