A preview of this full-text is provided by Springer Nature.
Content available from Soft Computing
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
METHODOLOGIES AND APPLICATION
Machine learning for KPIs prediction: a case study of the overall
equipment effectiveness within the automotive industry
Choumicha EL Mazgualdi
1
•Tawfik Masrour
1
•Ibtissam El Hassani
1
•Abdelmoula Khdoudi
1
Published online: 5 October 2020
Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020
Abstract
Key performance indicators are tools for management, decision support and forecasting; they reflect the strategy and vision
of the company in terms of objectives and allow to always staying in step with the expectations of the stakeholders.
Accurate forecasting of the indicators allows decisions to be reoriented to ensure performance optimization while reducing
both cost and effort. This paper aims to apply different machine learning methods, namely support vector regression,
optimized support vector regression (using genetic algorithm), random forest, extreme gradient boosting and deep learning
to predict the overall equipment effectiveness as a case study. We will make use of several configurations of the listed
models in order to provide a wide field of comparison. The data used to train our models were provided by an automotive
cable production industry. The result shows that the configuration in which we used cross-validation technique, and we
performed a duly splitting of data, provides predictor models with the better performances.
Keywords Machine learning Key performance indicators Overall equipment effectiveness Prediction
Improvement
1 Introduction
1.1 Key performance indicators (KPI)
Today, dashboards have become an indispensable tool. It
must provide managers, from operational management to top
management, with the information they need in order to
make decisions. It consists of a set of indicators designed to
allow managers to see the progress of their systems, and it
reflects the company’s strategy and vision in terms of
objectives. So, it allows to follow both the targeted results
and the actions, both corrective and preventive ones that
achieve the objectives set. Key performance indicators are
most often the result of a long chain of information gathering
and aggregation, and they generally allow responsiveness
and decisions are made more and more quickly.
But that is not enough in the current context. Today, in order
to maintain or gain competitive advantage, organizations place
the search for ‘‘proactivity’’ at the forefront of their concerns:
the precise forecasts of the indicators make possible to redirect
decisions in order to guarantee an optimization of the perfor-
mances, and reducing costs and efforts. Nowadays, in the
digitalization age, information systems are managing more and
more data, making them useful for predicting KPI’s thanks to
advances in artificial intelligence algorithms, notably machine
learning. This new generation of intelligent systems of pre-
diction is precisely the engines of the proactivity, as computing
power has become cheaper and more available.
1.2 Overall equipment effectiveness (OEE)
The overall equipment effectiveness (OEE) is a perfor-
mance measurement metric widely used. Its calculation
Communicated by V. Loia.
&Tawfik Masrour
t.masrour@ensam.umi.ac.ma
Choumicha EL Mazgualdi
c.elmazgualdi@edu.umi.ac.ma
Ibtissam El Hassani
i.elhassani@ensam.umi.ac.ma
Abdelmoula Khdoudi
a.khdoudi@edu.umi.ac.ma
1
Laboratory of Mathematical Modeling, Simulation and Smart
Systems (L2M3S), Artificial Intelligence for Engineering
Sciences Team, ENSAM-Meknes, Moulay ISMAIL
University, B.P. 15290, Marjane 2, Al-Mansor,
50500 Meknes, Morocco
123
Soft Computing (2021) 25:2891–2909
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-020-05348-y(0123456789().,-volV)(0123456789().,-volV)
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.