ArticlePDF Available
Research-in-action community • Thinking in public: previews
Introducing 'Thinking in
public: previews'
Luigi Russi, Patricia Shaw, Alison Donaldson
Published on: Aug 31, 2020
DOI: 10.21428/d2eb3cdf.7af2f03c
License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0)
Research-in -action community • T hinking in public: pr eviews Int roducing ' Thinking in p ublic: previews
2
Thinking in public: previews
is a collection of work in progress, produced by the research-in-action
community. At the beginning of every journey, it is good to recall some of the conversations that led up
to it. So below, Patricia and Luigi (as co-convenors of the community) and Alison (as someone who pays
close attention to the social life of writing), do some of the work of re-tracing, and of naming, what
we find distinctive about this series of previews.
Taking others along
The earliest beginnings of
Thinking in public: previews
were probably in our aspiration to make visible
some of the work thats beginning to happen in the research-in-action community. Lots happens back
stagein the background of this website. A lot of that work involves circulating drafts, reading,
listening to and commenting on them, exploring ways to pursue further some of the threads appearing
in those early attempts.
Nurtured through person-to-person conversation between author, peers and mentors, this work
belongs to what might be called sharpening ones vision or finding deeper clarity about the direction
of ones inquiry. Metaphorically, its the silence of the painter mixing new colours, trying new strokes,
experimenting in the privacy of his/her
atelier
. There would be no creativity without this work
happening quietly behind the curtains.
However, there is another edge in the work of any careful practitioner who is trying to draw attention
to particular experiences that have been the source of insight/stirring/challenge for him or her. That is
the work of finding forms of expression suitable to take others along. This means moving away from
ones preferred shorthand, and taking the step of meeting others (fellow practitioners, publishers,
funders, collaborators) where they are. We invited Alison to work with us as we meet that edge, as
someone who has not shared the history of the community so far, who can bring fresh ears and eyes to
the work being produced.
Working with reviewers
This is the delicate edge of translationof what might begin as insightinto a more widely
accessible piece of work. Make no mistake; here, misunderstanding will be an ongoing companion:
how does that comment tie in with what I am actually trying to do in this piece? Youre not seeing
what I want to show!
Olympic patience is needed in searching for words, or images, to bring others closer to the experiences
explored in the work. Tackled alone, this can be the most disheartening edge met by practitioners
Research-in -action community • T hinking in public: pr eviews Int roducing ' Thinking in p ublic: previews
3
seeking to bring something genuinely new and striking to the conversation in their field. It makes a big
difference to meet this edge, not in isolation, but with the support of a community.
The research-in-action community aims to provide such support and thus to help thoughtful
practitioners become more skilled at the work of claiming their ground and bringing others along
with them. This
Thinking in public: previews
collection is less concerned with presenting finished
pieces, than with opening up
ways
of seeing/saying/understanding that may shift what a practitioner
judges is good to do, or not do, next.
‘Previews’ and ‘releases’
The previews sit alongside already published releases, as members of our community are also
publishing some of their work through other channels. We wanted to gather the releases as well, so
that a coherent body of work might begin to appear. Hence, the two collections: one for work thats still
in progress, and one for already formally published pieces. We liked the film association in previews
and releases, but before we settled on that we played with a few other metaphors, such as boating
(unvarnished and launched) and gardening (seeds and harvest). When we tested the options with a
few members of the community, the consensus was that previews and releases was more
recognisable, especially for an international readership.
Thinking in public
We still wanted an overall title that would disclose the unity of intention between the two collections.
Thats when
Thinking in public
came in. With this title, we are tipping our hats to the ongoing
inspiration of Hannah Arendt. Arendt originally gave the title
For Love of the World
to her seminal text
that was published as
The Human Condition
(
1958
).
1
In this work, she sought to give the phenomenon
of action its proper place in a tradition that had tended to elevate withdrawal from the world in
contemplation. For her, we cannot know who we are as humans until we appear among others,
venturing forth in word and deed in the public realm. But hers was always an ethical concern: how to
be thoughtful and not thoughtless as an actor in the world. The work of composing accounts of
practice and sharing them with others allows us to enter one anothers worlds, and create that
enlarged mentality that Arendt advocates.
Footnotes
. Arendt, H. (
1958
).
The Human Condition.
Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any references for this publication.