ArticlePDF Available

Muscle pain

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

Muscle pain, also known as myalgia, is most commonly associated with sprains or strains. It frequently presents as redness at the site of injury, tenderness, swelling and fever. Muscle pain may occur as a result of excitation of the muscle nociceptor due to overuse of the muscle, viral infections or trauma. The most important endogenous substance released in response to the damaged tissues or nociceptor nerve endings in regards with muscle pain is adenosine triphosphate (ATP). Optimal pain management involves a combination of non-opioid, opioid analgesics, adjuvants, as well as non-pharmacologic strategies. Non-opiod analgesics include paracetamol and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) like ibuprofen, which are indicated for mild to moderate pain. Whereas moderate to severe pain acquires opiod analgesics. This article provides an overview of muscle pain, the management and treatment thereof.
The page number in the footer is not for bibliographic referencingwww.tandfonline.com/oemd
24
S Afr Fam Pract
ISSN 2078-6190 EISSN 2078-6204
© 2017 The Author(s)
REVIEW
Key Summary Points
Muscle pain, known as myalgia, can be in one targeted area or
across many muscles, occurring with overexertion or overuse of
these muscles.
Pain can be classified as acute or chronic pain and further
categorized as nociceptive or neuropathic.
Causes of muscle pain include stress, physical activity, infections,
hyper or hypo-thyrodism.
Sprains and strains are the most common types of muscle pains.
Optimal pain management involves utilizing a combination of
non-opioid, opioid analgesics, adjuvants and non-pharmacologic
strategies.
Introduction
Muscle pain, medically known as myalgia, can be described as
pain that originates in any muscle of the body. The pain can be
in one targeted area or across many muscles, usually occurring
with overexertion or overuse of these muscles.
Pain, like love, is all consuming: when you have it, not much else
matters, and there is nothing you can do about it. Unlike love,
however, we are actually beginning to tease apart the mystery of
pain.”1
Myalgia may also occur without a primary trauma and this is
frequently associated with a viral infection. The severity of pain
may range from mild to severe, depending on the cause thereof.
It can typically be described as cramping and aching. Signs and
symptoms associated with muscle pain include; redness at the
site of injury, tenderness, swelling and fever.2
Classification of pain
Pain is classied according to its duration and pathogenesis.
Depending on the duration of pain, pain can either be classied
as acute or chronic.
Acute pain:
This type of pain usually arises after obvious tissue damage
and is therefore nociceptive in nature. The pain can be clearly
located and resolves upon healing. It has a protective nature as it
distinctly warns individuals about harmful situations.3
Chronic pain:
Chronic pain usually persists from months to years. The intensity
of the pain no longer correlates with the causal stimuli as there is
changes to the nerve function and transmission. The pain loses
its protective and warning signs and thus serves no purpose.3
Further to this pain can either be classied as nociceptive or
neuropathic:4
Nociceptive pain:
This is known as a very high threshold pain that is activated in
the presence of stimuli. It is the normal physiological pain that is
associated with a warning signal that something is threatening
the person's bodily tissues. It is felt when a person comes into
contact with a stimuli, i.e. hot, cold or sharp. Nociceptive pain
acts as a physiological protective system and signals when there
is impending tissue damage. It requires immediate attention and
Abstract
Muscle pain, also known as myalgia, is most commonly associated with sprains or strains. It frequently presents as redness at the
site of injury, tenderness, swelling and fever. Muscle pain may occur as a result of excitation of the muscle nociceptor due to overuse
of the muscle, viral infections or trauma. The most important endogenous substance released in response to the damaged tissues
or nociceptor nerve endings in regards with muscle pain is adenosine triphosphate (ATP). Optimal pain management involves a
combination of non-opioid, opioid analgesics, adjuvants, as well as non-pharmacologic strategies. Non-opiod analgesics include
paracetamol and non-steroidal anti-inammatory drugs (NSAIDs) like ibuprofen, which are indicated for mild to moderate pain.
Whereas moderate to severe pain acquires opiod analgesics. This article provides an overview of muscle pain, the management
and treatment thereof.
Keywords: muscle pain, myalgia, sprains, strains, analgesics, opiods, nsaids
South African Family Practice 2017; 59(3):24-32
Open Access article distributed under the terms of the
Creative Commons License [CC BY-NC-ND 4.0]
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
Muscle pain
Omphile Mogole, Ralph Kandiwa, Oyetola Babarinde, Halima Ismail, Nokuthula Dlamini, Letlhogonolo Maluleke,
Quinten Labuschagne, Lucille Malan, Natalie Schellack*
School of Pharmacy, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University
*Corresponding author, email: natalie.schellack@smu.ac.za
Muscle pain 25
The page number in the footer is not for bibliographic referencingwww.tandfonline.com/oemd
25
action, like pulling your hand o a hot plate within an instant.
Sprains and/or strains, broken bones, lower back pain from disc
disease or injury, and burns are examples of nociceptive pain.1,4,5
Neuropathic pain:
This pain is considered to be maladaptive, and is a disease
state of the nervous system. This type of pain occurs after
there is damage to the nervous system. It is experienced due
to transmission of pain signals in the absence of actual tissue
damage or inammation, like bromyalgia, tension headaches
and irritable bowel syndrome. This pathological pain occurs
when there are heightened sensory signals in the central nervous
system and a low threshold of pain.1,4,5
Causes of muscle pain
Muscle pain can be caused by stress, tension or physical activity.
Some medical conditions known to cause muscle pain include.6-10
Infections
Hyper or hypo-thyrodism
Hypokalemia
Autoimmune conditions e.g. lupus
Side eects of certain medications (i.e. the Statins)
Pathophysiology of muscle pain
Muscle pain may occur as a result of excitation of muscle
nociceptor due to overuse of the muscle, inammation and or
trauma. When the impact has occurred, endogenous substances
are released in response to damaged tissues or nociceptor nerve
endings. Some of these substances include;11
Potassium ion
Prostaglandin E2
Bradykinin
Serotonin
Neuropeptides e.g. substance P
Somatostatin
Adenosine triphosphate
Of all substances released the most important one involved in
muscle pain is adenosine triphosphate (ATP) which is released
from muscle cells at high concentrations after damage to the
muscles. The increased levels of substances released from the
damaged tissues stimulate the nociceptors directly. The pain
experienced during movements of these damaged tissues are as
a result of the low threshold of sensitized muscle nociceptors.11-13
In the case of muscle inammation the level of substance
P and nerve growth factor (NGF) increases, which in turn leads to
hyperalgesia known as increased sensitivity to painful stimuli in
the aected muscle.11,13
Sprains and strains are the most common types of muscle pains
and is especially frequent in the elderly. Sprains occur as a result
of overstretching of the ligaments. This can be caused by twisting
of joints. The most regularly aected parts of the body are the
ankles and wrists. This is usually followed by pain, swelling and at
times bruising. Strains on the other hand are the overstretching
of muscle or tendons.4,14
Management of muscle pain
Non-Pharmacological Management
The non-pharmacological treatments for muscle pain are
illustrated in Figure 1.
Treatment modalities include the following
Transcutaneous electrical stimulation (TENS)
TENS is a non-invasive procedure used in rehabilitation to
modulate pain.15 Electrical currents are delivered through the
skin to activate central inhibitory pathways decreasing central
excitability. Activation of the descending inhibitory pathways
from the midbrain and brainstem leads to inhibition of the
nociceptive neurons in the spinal cord. This is used for acute and
chronic pain.16-17
Acupuncture
It is a traditional Chinese-based therapeutic method which
involves the insertion of small, solid needles into specic
points in the body in order to improve health or modify painful
states.18 There are several postulated mechanisms of action.
Acupuncture are indicated for chronic pain unresponsive to
standard therapy. Acupuncture may work via same mechanisms
of other complimentary therapies (placebo, diversion etc).19
Thermal modalities
Thermotherapy is the therapeutic use of heat, usually greater
than that of body temperature, to the body.20 Thermal modalities
are classied as supercial thermotherapy (the application of a
device that is used primarily to heat structures to 1 cm deep) and
deep thermotherapy (the application of a device that causes a
tissue temperature rise at 3 – 5 cm deep). Supercial heating
modalities include; dry hot packs, moist hot packs and paran
baths. Deep heat modalities include therapeutic ultrasound.20
Non-Pharmacological Treatment Modalities
TENS
Non-invasive
Used in
rehabilitation to
modulate pain
Acute and
chronic pain
Therapeutic use
of heat:
Superficial
heating (dry
hot or moist
hot packs and
paraffin baths)
Deep heating
(ultrasound)
Insertion of small
needles into
specific points on
the body
Chronic pain,
unresponsive to
standard therapy
Acupuncture Thermal Modalities
[TENS: Transcutaneous Electrical Stimulation]
Figure 1: Non-pharmacological treatments of muscle pain
S Afr Fam Pract 2017;59(3):24-3226
The page number in the footer is not for bibliographic referencingwww.tandfonline.com/oemd
26
Pharmacological management
Optimal pain management involves utilizing a combination
of non-opioid, opioid analgesics, adjuvants and non-
pharmacologic strategies. The approach must be adapted such
that it is possible in resource limited areas as well. Treatment
guidelines should therefore consider the acute and chronic
phase of the pain state, and recommend the appropriate
pharmacologic or non-pharmacologic treatment using evidence
based recommendations. They should also indicate when a
single mode of treatment is appropriate and when multiple
modes are required .21-23
The multimodal approach to pain management involves
administering two or more analgesics with dierent mechanisms
of action. The routes of administration may also be dierent. This
approach as aimed at providing a synergistic eect of analgesia
using the lowest possible doses of these medications than if they
were used alone.24
Non-opioid analgesics
The following non-opioid related medicines are available for
managing pain in children: paracetamol, and the non-steroidal
anti-inammatory drugs (NSAIDs), for example naproxen,
ibuprofen and mefenamic acid. They adequately treat mild
pain and moderate-to-severe pain in combination with other
medicines, particularly opioids, to provide more eective relief
and reduce adverse eects.25
Paracetamol
Paracetamol is one of the drugs of choice in pain
management, due to its excellent safety prole and lack of
any signicant side-eects.26 It acts as a prodrug, with an
active cannabinoid metabolite. In the brain and spinal cord,
paracetamol follows deacetylation to its primary amine
(p-aminophenol) which is conjugated with arachidonic acid
to form N- arachidonolylphenolamide, a compound known
as an endogenous cannabinoid. The involved enzyme is fatty
acid amide hydrolase. N-arachidonolylphenolamide is an
agonist at the Transient Receptor Potential Cation Channel,
Subfamily V, Member 1 (TRPV1) receptors and an inhibitor of
cellular anandamide uptake, which leads to increased levels of
endogenous cannabinoids, inhibiting cyclooxygenases in the
brain at concentration that are probably not attainable with
analgesic dosages of paracetamol. It is of interest to note that
a cannabinoid-1 receptor antagonist, given at a dosage level
that completely prevents the analgesic activity of a selective
cannabinoid receptor agonist, completely inhibits the analgesic
activity of paracetamol as well. This fact allows us to explain the
mechanism of action of paracetamol in more detail. Despite
this nding, however, the denite proof that the analgesic
and antipyretic eects of paracetamol are dependent on COX-
inhibition is still unclear. Hence, it works eectively when is
combined with codeine for more eective control of moderate-
to-severe pain and discomfort.27
Paracetamol is available orally, in several tablet and liquid
formulations however the dosage should be guided by the age
and general condition of the patient.28
Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
Non-Steroidal Anti-inammatory agent (NSAIDs) competitively
inhibit the cyclo-oxygenase (COX) enzyme, the enzymes
facilitate the bioconversion of arachidonic acid to inammatory
prostaglandins. This results in the blockade of prostaglandin
synthesis and subsequently dampened inammatory
responses.29-30 COX-1 and 2 are isozymes that only vary genetically.
NSAIDs have three pharmacological preferred attributes i.e.
analgesia, anti-inammatory and anti-pyretic activity. They
generally have similar analgesic properties but selection is
based on their receptor selectivity. COX-1 receptor activation
produces gastric eects that mediate hyper-secretion of gastric
acid, thinning of the lumen and propagate the development of
gastric ulcers. These medicines have various formulations.31
The only over the counter (OTC) available pain medications is
aspirin (S0) and paracetamol (S2) and requires no prescription.
The NSAID ibuprofen is S2 when intended for the treatment
of post traumatic conditions such as pain, swelling and
inammation, for a maximum period of ve days without a
prescription. All other NSAIDs are S3 and can only be obtained
via a prescription from a physician (Act 101 of 1965).
It is important to note that NSAIDs have ceiling analgesic eects
but the Cyclooxygenase -2 mediated anti-inammatory eects
are dose dependant.33 COX-2 is not detected in most normal
tissues, but its expression is rapidly induced by stimuli such as
proinammatory cytokines (IL-1b, TNFα), lipopolysaccharides,
mitogens and oncogenes (phorbol esters), broblast growth
factor, epidermal growth factor, (luteinizing hormone, LH) and
uid-electrolyte hemostasis, resulting in increased synthesis of
PGs in inamed and neoplastic tissues.29
The non-steroidal anti-inammatory drugs (NSAIDs), such as
asprin, ibuprofen, diclofenac, ketorolac and mefenamic acid,
have analgesic and anti-inammatory properties, which are
useful in the management of pain.27
Ibuprofen is one of the most frequently used NSAIDs for mild
and moderate pain.34 The medicine has gained advantage in
the market as is available as an over-the-counter medication
for fever reduction, as well as pain relief. Studies have shown
ibuprofen to be superior in terms of its safety prole, compared
to ketorolac. However, ketorolac has been used as a single agent
for the treatment of postoperative pain, especially when used as
an adjuvant to opioid analgesia.35
If pain is constantly present, analgesics should be administered
on a regular time schedule, i.e. ‘by the clock, whereby the
medicine is administered at a xed time interval with dosages
tailored according to the patient’s pain, with the next dosage
given before peak time eect of the previous dosage has worn
o. This will result in more predictable and consists level of
analgesia. 23,25
Muscle pain 27
The page number in the footer is not for bibliographic referencingwww.tandfonline.com/oemd
27
Aspirin and paracetamol are very popular as over the counter
pain medication.1 Selection of analgesic used is determined by
the side eect prole and severity of pain.
Opioid analgesics
Opioid analgesic will provide analgesia for moderate to severe
pain, for the vast majority and with a wide margin of safety.36
This group includes the following examples: codeine, morphine,
oxycodone, methadone, fentanyl and pethidine. Opioids can be
divided into weak and strong opioids. Weak opioids are used
alone or in combination with other analgesics, in management
if moderate pain. Strong opioids are usually reserved for severe
pain.3
Opioids are the third-step in the pain treatment ladder and the
recommended treatment of moderate or severe pain.37 One of
the undesirable eects which is of great concern in healthcare is
dependence, which is associated with prolonged use of opioids.
Concomitant administration of an opioid with ibuprofen can
reduce the amount of opioid analgesic required for pain control.
Pethidine, morphine and fentanyl
A variety of opioids are available for use; however, there is
insucient evidence to support a preference of one opioid
over another.38-39 Pethidine does not provide good analgesia
compared to morphine and should not be used long-term
because of the possible accumulation of its toxic metabolite,
nor-pethidine, that can result in seizures. Fentanyl provides
approximately equal analgesic eects to morphine, and can be
used for rapid analgesia over short periods of time if morphine is
contra-indicated. Opioids are the most commonly administered
intravenous agents for moderate to severe pain. The opioid
dosage that eectively relieves pain can dier, and should be
based on a pain severity assessment. However, the long-term
use of opioids is associated with constipation; therefore, a
combination of a stool softener and stimulant laxative can be
Table 1: Formulations, dosages and side-effects of various pain medications
Drug Formulations Dosages Side effects
Paracetamol Tablets
Suppositories
Intravenous Solutions
1-4 g/daily 1g q 6 hourly Hypersensitivity skin reactions: neutropenia,
thrombocytopenia
Nephrotoxicity
Hepatoxicity
Non-specific NSAIDs
Ibuprofen Tablets
Topical patch
Topical Gel
Oral syrup
200-400 mg q 4-6 hourly Same as for diclofenac
Indomethacin Capsules 25-50 mg q 6-8 hourly CNS effects: Dizziness drowsiness, mental confusion,
headache in less than 10% to patients
Corneal deposits
Ketaprofen tablets 200 mg daily with food Same as Diclofenac
Diclofenac Tablets
Intramuscular Injection
Topical Gel
Suppositories
Topical patch
Oral: 25-50 mg q 8hourly, to
maximum of 150 mg/day
Intramuscular: 75 mg q 12 hourly,
maximum of 150mg/day for
2 days only
Suppositories: 100 mg daily
GIT: Gastric erosion ,peptic ulceration
Hypersensitivity reactions: Skin rashes, pruritus
and angioedema
Renal toxicity
Piroxicam Tablets
Topical Gel
40mg/day Same as Diclofenac
Naproxen Tablets 500 mg q 12 hourly Same as Diclofenac
Mefanemic Acid Oral syrups
Tablets
Suppositories
500 mg q 8 hourly
COX-2 Inhibitors
Celecoxib Tablets
Capsules
100-200 mg q 12 hourly GIT: Nausea , dyspepsia, diarrhoea , flatulence
Steven-Johnsons Syndrome
Hypersensitivity reaction: Toxic epidermal
necrolysis
Renal toxicity
Etoricoxib Tablets
Capsules
60-90 mg q 12 hourly Same as for Celecoxib
Meloxicam Tablets
Capsules
7.5 mg q 12 hourly or 15 mg daily Same as for Celecoxib
S Afr Fam Pract 2017;59(3):24-3228
The page number in the footer is not for bibliographic referencingwww.tandfonline.com/oemd
28
used as prophylaxis when it is anticipated that these agents will
be used over an extended period of time. 38-39
Morphine is well established as the rst-line strong opioid and
is available in both immediate-release and prolonged-release
formulations. Immediate-release tablets are used to individualise
patient dosages and have an adequate dosage for pain control.
Prolonged-release oral formulations improve patient compliance
by allowing longer dosing intervals. Oral morphine solution is
usually used for persistent pain and when patients are unable to
swallow tablets.39
The use of a pain scale to manage pain is a crucial part of eective
opioid therapy because these medicines do not have a so-called
ceiling eect. Therefore it is imperative to ensure an appropriate
dosage that provides eective analgesia with manageable side-
eects. A suitable opioid antagonist, such as naloxone, should
also be available in the healthcare for the management of
adverse eects or opioid-related complications.23
When pain management is no longer needed, slow withdrawal
of opioids may be necessary to prevent abstinence syndrome,
with continuous monitoring of the vital signs. This may require
tapering the daily dosage whilst monitoring the level of pain,
and with continuous reassessment to ensure that the patient is
pain free.39
Combination Opioid Formulations
When pain management by paracetamol and NSAIDs is
inadequate, combination agents are usually employed.
Hydrocodone and oxycodone have been increasingly used in
combination with paracetamol.37 These agents proved to be
more eective in post-surgical injuries and exhibit increased pain
relief compared singular usage of NSAIDs. Caution is indicated
in patients that have a previous problem with drug abuse and
seizures as some patients on antidepressants (SSRIs, MOA) have
experienced seizures with concomitant use of these agents.31
Table 2: Formulations, receptors and doses of opioids
Opioids Formulation Receptors it works on Doses
Morphine Tablets
Intravascular injection
Subdermal patch
Oral syrup
mu-(µ) and kappa-(k) opioid receptors PO 5-30 mg ,3-4hrly
IM 5-10mg 3-4 hourly
IV 1-2.5mg 5 – 10mnts up
to 15mg
Hydromorphine Tablets mu-(µ) and kappa-(k) opioid receptors 4-8mg every 24 hours
Codeine Tablets
Oral syrup
Partial agonist on k-receptors and µ receptors,
full agonist on delta (δ)receptor
PO 30 -60mg 4-6 hours
Hydrocodone Tablets mu-(µ) and kappa-(k) opioid receptors 5-10mg 4-6 hours
Fentanyl Intravascular solution
Transdermal Patch
mu-(u) receptor IV 25-50mcg/h
IM 50-100mcg/h
Transdermal 25mcg/h every
72 hours
Methadone Oral linctus
intramuscular
delta (δ) receptor PO 10-25mg 3-4hrly
IM 10-25mg 8-12 hourly
Mild to moderate pain
Moderate pain
Severe pain
Non-opioid analgesics:
Aspirin, paracetamol or ibuprofen;
With / without an adjuvant*
Weak opioid analgesics:
Codeine, dextropropoxyphene,
tramadol or buprenorphine);
With / without a non-opioid, such as
aspirin, paracetamol or ibuprofen;
With / without an adjuvant*
Strong opioid analgesics:
Morphine, hydromorphone,
oxycodone, buprenorphine or
tapentadol*;
With / without a non-opioid, such as
aspirin, paracetamol or ibuprofen;
With / without an adjuvant*
[*Examples of adjuvants include corticosteroids, antidepressants, hypnotics and anticonvulsants/antiepileptic agents.]
Persistent or worsening pain
Figure 2: The World Health Organization’s three-step analgesic ladder3
[*Examples of adjuvants include corticosteroids, antidepressants, hypnotics and anticonvulsants/antiepileptic agents.]
Muscle pain 29
The page number in the footer is not for bibliographic referencingwww.tandfonline.com/oemd
29
Adjuvant Therapy
Adjunctive therapy is sometimes necessary to manage the
side-eects of medications for pain, provide symptom relief,
treat anxiety and manage related or underlying conditions.
This is because patients with chronic pain are more likely to
report anxiety, depression neuropathic pain and signicant
activity limitations. Examples of adjuvant medicines include
corticosteroids, anxiolytics, antidepressants, hypnotics and
anticonvulsants/antiepileptic agents.23,40
A step-wise approach
The World Health Organization’s (WHO) ‘analgesic ladder’
serves as the mainstay of treatment for the relief of pain
together with psychological and rehabilitative modalities. This
multidimensional approach oers the greatest potential for
maximising analgesia and minimising adverse eects.23,40
According to the WHO, the key concepts to the eective
management of pain are as follows:23,40
By mouth: If possible analgesics should be given by mouth.
By the clock: Analgesics should be given at xed time intervals
and the dosage should be titrated according to the patient’s
pain, and the next dosage should be given before the previous
dosage has fully worn o.
For the individual: The choice and dosages of the analgesics
should be tailored to the needs and circumstances of the
particular patient.
By the ladder: The well-known WHO ladder, illustrated in Figure
2, advocates a step-wise approach to the use of analgesics, as
explained below.
Step 1: Non-opioids (e.g. aspirin, paracetamol or ibuprofen) are
used for mild to moderate pain.
Step 2: Weak opioids (e.g. codeine phosphate, dihydrocodeine,
tramadol and buprenorphine) are recommended for moderate
pain, used alone or in combination with one of the non-opioids
mentioned in step 1.
Step 3: Strong opioids (morphine, hydromorphone, oxycodone,
buprenorphine and tapentadol) may be used alone or in
combination with a non-opioid (from the rst step) for severe
pain.
If the patient’s pain is already severe, it is recommended that
the physician should move to the third level of the ladder
immediately, rather than starting with the rst two.
As illustrated by Figure 2, opioids play an important role in the
management of, not only acute and chronic pain, but also in the
management of moderate to severe pain.23,40
However, certain barriers limit the eective use of opioids in the
management of pain:
Concerns about the use of opioids from health care workers,
family members and patients; these concerns may be related
to the side-eects and risk of dependence when using the
opioids.
Development of tolerance to the chronic use of opioids.
In instances where muscle pain does not subside with the use
of mentioned analgesics, an alternative interventional therapy
is muscle relaxants, where the relief of muscle spasms may also
reduce pain and discomfort.41
Skeletal muscle relaxants are classied into two main categories
namely, antispasticity and antispasmodic medications.
Antispascitic medications (e.g. baclofen) acts on the spinal cord
or on the skeletal muscles itself to better muscle hypertonicity
and involuntary spasms. Antispasmodic medications lessons
muscle spasms through alterations of central nervous
conduction. These agents are divided into benzodiazepines and
nonbenzodiazepines.41
A new skeletal muscle relaxant in South Africa is Myprocam®.
The active ingredient is cyclobenzaprine, a nonbenzodiazepine
antispasmodic agent, which blocks nerve impulses recognized
as pain. Cyclobenzaprine is structurally related to the tricyclic
antidepressants, like amitriptyline and nortriptyline. It is
categorized as a muscle relaxant with a mechanism of action
not fully understood, but is thought to be an agonist of the α
receptor at the descending noradrenergic neurons within the
supraspinal area of the brain stem. Some evidence also revealed
seretonergic antagonism of the 5-HT2 receptors.41-42
Myprocam® is often combined with analgesics like ibuprofen or
naproxen and is used in addition to rest and physical therapy for
short-term relief of muscle spasm associated with acute, painful
musculoskeletal conditions. The recommended adult dose is a
15 mg capsule, taken once daily. Some patients may require up
to 30 mg per day, administerd as one Myprocam® 30 mg capsule,
taken once daily, or as two Myprocam® 15 mg capsules, taken
once daily.42-43
Side eects include dizziness and drowsiness. Other
anticholinergic eects such as dry mouth, blurred vision,
constipation and urinary retention will be expected due to
activity on cholinergic receptors. Cardiac arrhythmias like QTc
prolongation is likely to arise and should be used with caution
in patients with a history of arrhythmias or who are using any
medications prolonging the QTc interval. Myprocam is contra-
indicated in patients older than 65 years, or in patients with
impaired liver function.41-43
Adequate evidence for the eectiveness of the prolonged use of
Myprocam® is not available and therapy for longer periods of use
is seldom warranted, the duration of use should hence only be
for short periods of not more than three weeks.41-43
Conclusion
Muscle pain, or myalgia can be in one targeted area or across
many muscle. The severity of muscle pain can range from mild
to severe depending on the cause. It usually occurs with overuse
of the muscles, inammation or trauma causing excitation
of muscle nociceptor but is also frequently associated with
a viral infection. The eective management of patients with
muscle pain is through a step-wise approach, oering the
greatest potential for maximum analgesia and the minimum
adverse eects. Non-Pharmacological and pharmacological
Figure 2: The World Health Organization’s three-step analgesic ladder3
[*Examples of adjuvants include corticosteroids, antidepressants, hypnotics and anticonvulsants/antiepileptic agents.]
S Afr Fam Pract 2017;59(3):24-3232
The page number in the footer is not for bibliographic referencingwww.tandfonline.com/oemd
32
management are often applied for patients with chronic or
recurrent muscle pain associated with medical disease or injury.
Pharmacological management, depending on the severity
of muscle pain, may include OTC medicines such as aspirin,
ibuprofen and/or paracetamol or prescription medicine such
as other NSAIDs (diclofenac, naproxen, mefenamic acid etc)
or opioids for moderate to severe muscle pain. Adjunctive
therapy is sometimes necessary to manage the side-eects of
medications, provide symptom relief, treat anxiety or to manage
related or underlying conditions.
References:
1. Woolf, C. 2010. What is this thing called pain? Journal of Clinical Investigation,
120(11), pp.3742-3744.
2. Stöppler, MC. 2016. [online] Available at: http://ww.medicinenet.com/muscle_
pain_myalgia/symptoms.htm [Accessed 29 Nov. 2016].
3. Baumann, T.J., Herndon, C.M., Strickland, J.M. Chapter 44. Pain
Management.In:DiPiro JT, Talbert RL, Yee GC, Matzke GR, Wells BG, Posey L.eds.
Pharmacotherapy: A Pathophysiologic Approach, 9e.New York, NY: McGraw-Hill;
2014.http://accesspharmacy.mhmedical.com/content.aspx?bookid=689&Sectio
nid=45310494.(Accessed: January 13, 2017).
4. Widerström-Noga, E., Biering-Sørensen, F., Bryce, T., Cardenas, D., Finnerup, N.,
Jensen, M., Richards, J. and Siddall, P. (2014). The International Spinal Cord Injury
Pain Basic Data Set (version 2.0).Spinal Cord 2014; 52, pp.282–286.
5. Bryce, T.N., Biering-Sorensen, F., Finnerup, N.B., Cardenas, D.D., Defrin,
R., Lundeberg, T. et al. 2012. International spinal cord injury pain (ISCIP)
classification: part I. Background and description. Spinal Cord 2012; 50,
pp.413–417.
6. Treede, R., Rief, W., Barke, A., Aziz, Q., Bennett, M.I, Benoliel, R., Cohen, M.,
Evers, S., Finnerup, N.B., First, M.B., Giamberardino, M.A., Kaasa, S., Kosek, E.,
Lavand'homme, P., Nicholas, M., Perrot, S., Scholz, J., Schug, S., Smith, B.H.,
Svensson, P., Vlaeyen, J.W.S. & Wangw, S. 2015. A classification of chronic pain for
ICD-11. <https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4450869/> (Accessed:
13 January 2017).
7. Fosam, H. 2016. On the Need to Update the Definition of Pain. <http://www.
clinicalpainadvisor.com/chronic-pain/updating-the-definition-of-pain/
article/574907/> (Accessed: 13 January 2017).
8. Lindley, R. 2015. The Complex History of Pain: An Interview with Joanna Bourke.
http://historynewsnetwork.org/article/158076. (Accessed: November 21, 2016).
9. O'Connell, K. 2016. Muscle Aches. http://www.healthline.com/health/muscle-
aches#Overview1 (Accessed: 26th November 2016).
10. Katz J, Rosenbloom BN. The golden anniversary of Melzack and Wall's gate
control theory of pain: Celebrating 50 years of pain research and management.
Pain Res Manag 2015;20, pp.285-286.
11. Butts, R., Dunning, J., Perreault, T., Mourad, F. and Matthew, G. 2016. 'Peripheral
and Spinal Mechanisms of Pain and Dry Needling Mediated Analgesia: A Clinical
Resource Guide for Health Care Professionals', International Journal of Physical
Medicine & Rehabilitation, 4(2), pp. 1-18 [Online]. Available at:https://www.
omicsonline.org/open-access/peripheral-and-spinal-mechanisms-of-pain-and-
dry-needling-mediatedanalgesia-a-clinical-resource-guide-for-health-care-
professional-2329-9096-1000327.php?aid=71582(Accessed: 13 January 2016).
12. Mense, S. (2000)Pathophysiology of muscle pain, 3rd ed., France: EFIC .
13. Mense, S. 2008. Muscle pain: mechanisms and clinical
significance. NCBI,105(12), pp. 214-219 [Online]. Available at:https://www.ncbi.
nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2696782/(Accessed: 13 January 2016).
14. Van Schoor, J. 2006. Muscle pain in adults, South African Pharmacist’s Assistant,
(Jan/Feb 2006), pp. 10-14.
15. Vance, C., Rakel, B., Dailey, D. and Sluka, K. 2015. Skin impedance is not a factor
in transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation effectiveness. Journal of Pain
Research p.571
16. Johnson, M.I., 2012. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS). eLS.
17. Dailey, D.L., Rakel, B.A., Vance, C.GT., Liebano, R.E., Anand. A.S., Bush, H.M., Lee,
K.S., Lee, J.E., Sluka, K.A. 2013. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS)
reduces pain, fatique, and hyperalgesia while restoring central inhibition in
primary fibromyalgia. National institute of health: Pain, 154(11), pp.2554-2562.
18. Huang, Y., Lin, J., Yang, H., Lee, Y. and Yu, C. 2014. Clinical effectiveness of laser
acupuncture in the treatment of temporomandibular joint disorder. Journal of
the Formosan Medical Association, 113(8), pp.535-539.
19. Wilkonson, J., Falerio, R. 2007. Acupuncture in pain management. Continuing
education in anaesthesia, critical care and pain. 7:4, pp.135-138.
20. Draper, D., Hawkes, A., Johnson, A., Diede, M. and Rigby, J. 2013. Muscle Heating
With Megapulse II Shortwave Diathermy and ReBound Diathermy. Journal of
Athletic Training, 48(4), pp.477-482.
21. World Health Organisation (WHO). WHO Normative Guidelines on Pain
Management: Report of a Delphi Study to determine the need for guidelines
and to identify the number and topics of guidelines that should be developed
by WHO, 2007. [Homepage on internet]. Available from: http://www.who.int/
medicines/areas/quality_safety/delphi_study_pain_guidelines.pdf. (Accessed:
13 Jan 2017).
22. Guidelines on the pharmacological treatment of persisting pain in children with
medical illnesses. 2012.[Homepage on internet]. Available from: http://www.
who.int/medicines/areas/quality_safety/guide_perspainchild/en/ (Accessed: 13
Jan 2017).
23. WHO guidelines on the pharmacological treatment of persisting pain in
children with medical illnesses. 2012.[Homepage on internet]. Available from:
http://www.who.int/medicines/areas/quality_safety/guide_perspainchild/en/
(Accessed: 12 Jan 2017).
24. Pasero, C & Stannard, D. 2012. The Role of Intravenous Acetaminophen in Acute
Pain Management: A Case-Illustrated Review. Pain Manag Nurs;13(2):107-124
25. Verghese, S.T & Hannallah, R.S. 2010. Acute Pain Management in Children.
Journal of Pain Research,3, pp.105-123.
26. The International Consensus Group for Neonatal Pain. 2001. New guidelines for
management of neonatal pain. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine;
155(2), pp. 173-180.
27. Ottani, A., Leone, S., Maurizio, S., Ferrari, A. & Bertolini, A. 2006. The analgesic
activity of paracetamol is prevented by the blockade of cannabinoid CB1
receptors. European Journal of Pharmacology. 531(1), pp. 280-281.
28. Cohen, L.L., Lemanek, k., Blount, R.L., Dahlquist, L.M., Lim, C.S., Palermo, T.M.,
Mckenna, K.D., & Weiss, K.E. 2007. Evidence- based Assessment of Pediatric Pain.
Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 10, 1093.
29. Zarghi, A., & Arfaei, S. 2011. Selective COX-2 Inhibitors: A Review if Their
Structure Activity Relationships. 10 (4) IJPR <https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/
articles/PMC3813081/> (Accessed: 13 January 2017)
30. Chan, A.T., & Dettering, E. 2013. Prospects For Chemoprevention Of Colorectal
Neoplasia. 1st ed. Berlin: Springer.
31. Park, H.J., & Dong, E.M. 2010. Pharmacologic Management Of Chronic Pain. The
Korean Journal of Pain 23(2), pp.99-108.
32. Medicines and related substance act 101 of 1965.http://www.hpcsa.co.za/
Uploads/editor/UserFiles/downloads/legislations/acts/medicines_and_related_
sub_act_101_of_1965.pdf (Accessed: 16 Jan 2017).
33. Crofford, L.J. 2010. Adverse Effects Of Chronic Opioid Therapy For Chronic
Musculoskeletal Pain. Nature Reviews Rheumatology 6.4, pp.191-197.
34. Gray, L., Watt, L. & Blass, E.M. 2000. Skin-to Skin Contact Is Analgesic in Healthy
Newborns. Pediatrics, 105:e14. Available from: http://pediatrics.aappublications.
org/cgi/content/full/105/1/e14 (Accessed: 16 Jan 2017).
35. Lundgren, C. & Mohr, W. 2009. SA Acute Pain Guidelines. South African Journal
Of Anaesthesia. 15(6).
36. Lloyd-Thomas, A.R. 1990. Pain Management in Peadiatric Patients. British journal
of Anaesthesia, 64, pp. 85-104.
37. Blondell, R.D., Azadfard, M., and Wisnieeski, A. 2013. Pharmacologic therapy for
acute pain. American academy of family physicians. 87(11), pp.765-772.
38. Bouwmeester, J., Van Dijk, M., & Tibboel, D. 1999. Human neonates and pain. In:
Hendriksen CFM, Morton DB, editors. Humane endpoints in animal experiments
for biomedical research. London: Royal society of medicine press.
39. Palermo, T.M., Valrie, C.R. & Karlson, C.W. 2014. Family and Parent Influences
on Pediatric Chronic Pain. American psychological Association. Department of
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine , University of Washington and Center for
Child Health, Behaviour and Development, Seattle Children’s Research Institute,
Seattle, Washington; Vol 69 ( 2), pp.142-152.
40. Vargas-Schaffer, G. 2010. Is the WHO analgesic ladder still valid? Twenty-four
years of experience Can Fam Physician. 56(6), pp. 514–517.
41. Witenko, C., Mooman-Li, R., Motycka, C., Duane, K., Hincapie-Castillo, J.,
Leonard, P., Valaer, C. 2014. Considerations for the appropriate ase of skeletal
muscle relaxants for the management of acute low back pain. Pharmacy and
therapeutics, 39(6). pp. 427-435.
42. Myprocam®. South African package insert, March 2014.
43. Truven Health Analytics. Cyclobenzaprine Drugdex monograph. Micromedex
Online, 2015.
Article
Objective This study aims to determine the effectivity of dry needling added to the standard treatment to improve pain in patients with upper trapezius myalgia. Methods This study is a randomized controlled trial conducted at Inco Hospital, Sorowako, South Sulawesi, Indonesia, involving 20 subjects who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Subjects were divided into two equal groups. The intervention group was treated with dry needling as the addition to standard care, and the control group was treated with standard care only. Both groups were treated three times a week for five weeks. The pain was measured using NPRS at baseline and after three times therapy for five weeks. Results At the end of therapy, both groups showed a decrease in pain perception compared to baseline. The pain was improved significantly better in the intervention group compared to the control group. Conclusion The addition of dry needling in the standard care of upper trapezius myalgia resulted in more effective pain improvement compared to usual care.
Article
Full-text available
The upcoming 11th revision of the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD) of the World Health Organization (WHO) offers a unique opportunity to improve the representation of painful disorders. For this purpose, the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) has convened an interdisciplinary task force of pain specialists. Here, we present the case for a reclassification of nervous system lesions or diseases associated with persistent or recurrent pain for ≥3 months. The new classification lists the most common conditions of peripheral neuropathic pain: trigeminal neuralgia, peripheral nerve injury, painful polyneuropathy, postherpetic neuralgia, and painful radiculopathy. Conditions of central neuropathic pain include pain caused by spinal cord or brain injury, poststroke pain, and pain associated with multiple sclerosis. Diseases not explicitly mentioned in the classification are captured in residual categories of ICD-11. Conditions of chronic neuropathic pain are either insufficiently defined or missing in the current version of the ICD, despite their prevalence and clinical importance. We provide the short definitions of diagnostic entities for which we submitted more detailed content models to the WHO. Definitions and content models were established in collaboration with the Classification Committee of the IASP's Neuropathic Pain Special Interest Group (NeuPSIG). Up to 10% of the general population experience neuropathic pain. The majority of these patients do not receive satisfactory relief with existing treatments. A precise classification of chronic neuropathic pain in ICD-11 is necessary to document this public health need and the therapeutic challenges related to chronic neuropathic pain.
Article
Full-text available
There are a number of biochemical, biomechanical, endocrinological and neurovascular mechanisms underpinning the anti-nociceptive and anti-inflammatory effects of dry needling (DN). While myofascial trigger points likely play a role in peripheral pain, a diagnostic tool for localizing them has not been validated, and DN studies that have targeted trigger points to elicit localized twitch responses have reported mixed results. Therefore, the mechanism responsible for DN-mediated analgesia may be more complicated. DN activates opioid-based pain reduction, mediated by endogenous cannabinoids and the sympathetic nervous system, and non- opioid pain relief via serotonin and norepinephrine from the brain stem. DN also triggers the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis centrally and the corticotropin releasing hormone-proopiomelanocortin-corticosteroid axis locally to inhibit cox-2, reducing inflammatory cytokines. Recent studies demonstrate that DN combined with mechanical and/or electric stimulation may reverse PKC-mediated peripheral hyperalgesic priming by normalizing nociceptive channels, to include TRPV, ASIC, TTX and P2X/Y. Electric DN (EDN) stimulates immune cells, fibroblasts and keratinocytes to release CGRP and substance-P, altering the stimulation of TTX receptors to reverse hyperalgesia. It also encourages the supraoptic nucleus to release oxytocin to quiet ASIC receptors peripherally and stimulate opioid interneurons spinally. Moreover, EDN inhibits ERK1/2 kinase pathways of inflammation in the spinal cord and stimulates Aδ fibers and N/OFQ to reverse C-fiber mediated central changes. Mechanotransduction of fibroblasts and peripheral nerves via TRPV1 and P2X/Y-mediated intracellular Ca2+ wave propagation and subsequent activation of the nucleus accumbens inhibits spinal pain transmission via glycinergic and opioidergic interneurons. The increased ATP is metabolized to adenosine, which activates P1 purinergic receptors, events considered key to DN analgesia and rho kinase-based tissue remodeling. Mechanotransduction-mediated release of histamine further explains analgesia secondary to needling points distal to pain. DN-mediated analgesia is dependent on a number of synergistic physiologic events involving biochemical and mechanical processes in neural, connective and muscle tissue.
Article
Full-text available
November 2015 marks the 50th anniversary of the 1965 Science publication “Pain Mechanisms: A New Theory” by Ronald Melzack and Patrick D Wall, in which the authors introduced the gate control theory of pain that has since revolutionized our under-standing of pain mechanisms and management. The brilliance, creativity and critical thought that went into the formulation and explication of the gate control theory of pain can best be appreciated by reading the original article. Fifty years later, having become part of our scientific history and accepted as common knowledge, the essence of the theory is often conveyed by the familiar diagram in Figure 1.
Article
Full-text available
Objective Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is a nonpharmacological intervention used to manage pain using skin surface electrodes. Optimal electrode placement is unclear. We hypothesized that better analgesia would occur if electrodes were placed over sites with lower skin impedance. Optimal site selection (OSS) and sham site selection (SSS) electrode sites on the forearm were identified using a standard clinical technique. Methods Experiment 1 measured skin impedance in the forearm at OSS and SSS. Experiment 2 was a crossover design double-blind randomized controlled trial comparing OSS-TENS, SSS-TENS, and placebo TENS (P-TENS) to confirm differences in skin impedance between OSS and SSS, and measure change in pressure pain threshold (PPT) following a 30-minute TENS treatment. Healthy volunteers were recruited (ten for Experiment 1 [five male, five female] and 24 for Experiment 2 [12 male, 12 female]). TENS was applied for 30 minutes at 100 Hz frequency, 100 µs pulse duration, and “strong but nonpainful” amplitude. Results Experiment 1 results demonstrate significantly higher impedance at SSS (17.69±1.24 Ω) compared to OSS (13.53±0.57 Ω) (P=0.007). For Experiment 2, electrode site impedance was significantly higher over SSS, with both the impedance meter (P=0.001) and the TENS unit (P=0.012) compared to OSS. PPT change was significantly greater for both OSS-TENS (P=0.024) and SSS-TENS (P=0.025) when compared to P-TENS. PPT did not differ between the two active TENS treatments (P=0.81). Conclusion Skin impedance is lower at sites characterized as optimal using the described technique of electrode site selection. When TENS is applied at adequate intensities, skin impedance is not a factor in attainment of hypoalgesia of the forearm in healthy subjects. Further investigation should include testing in patients presenting with painful conditions.
Chapter
Full-text available
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is a noninvasive, self‐administered technique to relieve pain. During TENS, pulsed electrical currents are administered across the intact surface of the skin to generate strong nonpainful TENS sensations or mild muscle twitching at the site of pain. TENS inhibits onward transmission of nociceptive (pain‐related) information in the central nervous system and appears to be beneficial for acute and chronic pain. Large meta‐analyses suggest positive outcomes for the relief of musculoskeletal and post‐operative pain, although many systematic reviews are inconclusive. Evidence suggests that some investigators have used small study sample sizes and TENS techniques that are unlikely to be effective based on the findings of studies that have evaluated optimal TENS settings using healthy volunteers. The national institute of health and clinical excellence (UK) recommend TENS for rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis and musculoskeletal pain associated with multiple sclerosis but not for nonspecific low back pain and labour pain. TENS is inexpensive, safe and popular with patients and for this reason practitioners continue to offer patients TENS until better quality evidence emerges. Key Concepts Pain is a major healthcare problem with the prevalence of chronic pain estimated to be greater than 20% in many European countries. TENS is an inexpensive, noninvasive, self‐administered technique that delivers pulsed electrical currents across the intact surface of the skin to relieve pain. Conventional TENS is administered using low intensity, high frequency currents to generate a strong nonpainful TENS paraesthesia within the site of pain, and acupuncture‐like TENS is administered using high intensity, low frequency currents to generate a strong nonpainful pulsating TENS sensation often accompanied by muscle twitching. Conventional TENS is used in the first instance, and acupuncture‐like TENS, which is a form of hyperstimulation, is used for patients who do not respond to conventional TENS. There is strong neurophysiological evidence that TENS synaptically inhibits onward transmission of nociceptive (pain‐related) impulses in the central nervous system. Clinical experience suggests that TENS is beneficial for acute and chronic pains that are nociceptive, neuropathic or musculoskeletal in origin. There are many randomised controlled clinical trials on TENS, but most are methodologically weak with small sample sizes and underdosing of TENS. The majority of systematic reviews on TENS are inconclusive with the National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence in the UK recommending that TENS is not cost effective for the management of nonspecific low back pain and established labour pain. There are some good quality systematic reviews on TENS that suggest that TENS is effective for musculoskeletal pain and post‐operative pain with the National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence in the UK recommending that TENS is cost effective for the management of rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis and musculoskeletal pain associated with multiple sclerosis.
Article
Full-text available
Background/Purpose Temporomandibular joint disorder (TMD) is a general term for diseases of the temporomandibular joint and orofacial muscles. In this study, we tested whether laser acupuncture was effective for the treatment of TMD. Methods Twenty patients with TMD were treated with diode K-Laser (wavelength 800 nm, energy density 100.5 J/cm2) once a week at four acupuncture points including three standard ipsilateral local points (ST6, ST7, Ashi point) and one contralateral distal point (LI4). A 10-cm visual analogue scale (0 no pain and 10 the most severe pain) was used for measuring the pain intensity before and after the treatment. Results Seventeen out of 20 patients (85%) showed various degrees of pain relief after laser acupuncture treatment. The average pain score was 6.3 ± 1.6 before treatment and 2.5 ± 2.2 after treatment. Significant pain relief after laser acupuncture treatment was achieved (p = 0.0003, Wilcoxon signed rank test). The 17 patients showed an average pain relief of 63 ± 31%. There were six patients who showed no TMD symptoms after an average of four treatments of laser acupuncture. The other 11 patients showed partial relief of TMD symptoms after treatment. Although the pain was still present, it was less and was acceptable. No side effects were reported in any patients during or after laser acupuncture treatments. Conclusion Laser acupuncture may be an alternative treatment modality for TMD because it is non-invasive, results in partial or total relief of pain, and has no side effects.
Article
Full-text available
Pain that recurs or persists is unfortunately a common experience for children. One of the unique considerations in pediatric chronic pain management is the bidirectional influences of children's pain experiences and parental and family factors. In this review we present a developmental perspective on understanding pediatric chronic pain and disability, highlighting factors relevant from infancy to adolescence, and family and parent influences. Preliminary evidence indicates that developmental processes are influenced and may also shape the pediatric pain experience. Parent emotions, behaviors, and health also play a role in children's pain experiences, where overly protective parent behaviors, increased distress, and history of chronic pain are important parent-level influences. Research on family-level influences has revealed that families of children with chronic pain have poorer family functioning (e.g., more conflict, less cohesion) than families of healthy children. Several important gaps exist in this research, such as in understanding basic developmental processes in children with chronic pain and how they influence children's perception of and responses to pain. Also, there is a lack of longitudinal data on family relationships and individual adjustment to allow for understanding of whether changes occur in parenting over the course of the child's chronic pain experience. Although parent interventions have been successfully incorporated into many cognitive-behavioral treatments for children with chronic pain conditions, little guidance exists for adapting intervention strategies to be developmentally appropriate. Additional research is needed to examine whether parent interventions are effective at different developmental stages and the best way to incorporate developmental goals into treatment. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2014 APA, all rights reserved).
Article
Full-text available
Context: A new continuous diathermy called ReBound recently has been introduced. Its effectiveness as a heating modality is unknown. Objective: To compare the effects of the ReBound diathermy with an established deep-heating diathermy, the Megapulse II pulsed shortwave diathermy, on tissue temperature in the human triceps surae muscle. Design: Crossover study. Setting: University research laboratory. Patients or other participants: Participants included 12 healthy, college-aged volunteers (4 men, 8 women; age = 22.2 ± 2.25 years, calf subcutaneous fat thickness = 7.2 ± 1.9 mm). Intervention(s): Each modality treatment was applied to the triceps surae muscle group of each participant for 30 minutes. After 30 minutes, we removed the modality and recorded temperature decay for 20 minutes. Main outcome measure(s): We horizontally inserted an implantable thermocouple into the medial triceps surae muscle to measure intramuscular tissue temperature at 3 cm deep. We measured temperature every 5 minutes during the 30-minute treatment and each minute during the 20-minute temperature decay. Results: Tissue temperature at a depth of 3 cm increased more with Megapulse II than with ReBound diathermy over the course of the treatment (F₆,₆₆ = 10.78, P < .001). ReBound diathermy did not produce as much intramuscular heating, leading to a slower heat dissipation rate than the Megapulse II (F₂₀,₂₂₀ = 28.84, P < .001). Conclusions: During a 30-minute treatment, the Megapulse II was more effective than ReBound diathermy at increasing deep, intramuscular tissue temperature of the triceps surae muscle group.
Chapter
Muscle injuries, ranging from mild contusions to severe strains, are the most common sports-related injuries encountered today. Although they have received scant attention compared to other sports injuries, such as soft-tissue injuries of the knee and shoulder, they are often very disabling and result in prolonged recovery and significant absence from competition. Successful treatment for these injuries remains largely conservative, following an athlete-specific rehabilitation protocol. As our know ledge of the cellular pathophysiology involved in injury and subsequent repair increases, researchers continue to search for treatments that may allow for shortened recovery times and earlier return to sports participation.
Article
Because TENS works by reducing central excitability and activating central inhibition pathways, we tested the hypothesis that TENS would reduce pain and fatigue and improve function and hyperalgesia in people with fibromyalgia who have enhanced central excitability and reduced inhibition. The current study used a double-blinded randomized, placebo controlled cross-over design to test effects of a single treatment of TENS in people with fibromyalgia. Three treatments were assessed in random order: active TENS, placebo TENS, no TENS. The following measures were assessed before and after each TENS treatment: pain and fatigue at rest and movement, pressure pain thresholds (PPTs), 6 minute walk test (6MWT), range of motion (ROM), five time sit to stand test (FTSTS), and single leg stance (SLS). Conditioned pain modulation (CPM) was completed at end of testing. There was a significant decrease in pain and fatigue with movement for active TENS compared to placebo and no TENS. PPTs increased at site of TENS (spine) and outside site of TENS (leg) when compared to placebo TENS or no TENS. During Active TENS CPM was significantly stronger compared to placebo TENS and no TENS. No changes in functional tasks were observed with TENS. Thus, the current study suggests TENS has short-term efficacy in relieving symptoms of fibromyalgia while the stimulator is active. Future clinical trials should examine the effects of repeated daily delivery of TENS, similar to how TENS is used clinically, on pain, fatigue, function and quality of life in individuals with fibromyalgia.