ArticlePDF Available

Pandemic of Racism: Public Health Implications of Political Misinformation. Harvard Public Health Review.



Misinformation amplified by political elites can lead to an increase in racism and discrimination against racial and ethnic minorities and other populations who experience vulnerabilities. Politically-motivated misinformation, as observed during the COVID-19 pandemic, can have far-ranging public health consequences, including negative physical and emotional health outcomes. Misinformation, political or otherwise, and racist rhetoric must be categorically rejected. Scientists and the general public have a moral duty to advocate against and repudiate the racialization of disease and racist speech in all forms (Yore, 2020).
Pandemic of Racism: Public Health Implications of Political
Ans Irfan, Ashley Bieniek-Tobasco, Cynthia Golembeski
Irfan A, Bieniek-Tobasco A, Golembeski C. Pandemic of racism: public health implications of political
Harvard Public Health Review
. 2020;28.
Misinformation amplified by political elites can lead to an increase in racism and discrimination against racial and ethnic
minorities and other populations who experience vulnerabilities. Politically-motivated misinformation, as observed during
the COVID-19 pandemic, can have far-ranging public health consequences, including negative physical and emotional health
outcomes. Misinformation, political or otherwise, and racist rhetoric must be categorically rejected. Scientists and the general
public have a moral duty to advocate against and repudiate the racialization of disease and racist speech in all forms (Yore,
COVID-19, Misinformation, and Racism
n the midst of the current COVID-19 pandemic, inflammatory and racist rhetoric driven and encouraged by
misinformation poses additional public health risks. In a crisis, fear is a natural response. Pandemics are no exception.
However, fear in an environment of political misinformation can lead to mistrust, inability to determine factual
information, and surges in racially driven discrimination or violence as is being witnessed today in the United States.
Negative emotions can spread like a contagion (Kramer et al., 2014) and politicians condoning inflammatory rhetoric can
encourage such racially motivated prejudice in a society (Newman et al., 2020). In the case of COVID-19, the spread of
deliberate political misinformation has been amplified by some of our political elites, especially against Asians and Asian
Americans. The likely adverse effects of this political misinformation are visible in the latest data from Stop AAPI Hate,
(APPPC, 2020) a collaborative project of the Asian Pacific Policy & Planning Council that collects and reports anti-Asian
American and Pacific islander hate violence, adult harassment, discrimination, shunning, and child bullying. The data
suggest an increase in hate crimes against Asian Americans with more than a thousand incidents reported in just a matter of
days after the project launch. Stop AAPI Hate has been issuing weekly reports (STOP AAPI HATE Reports, 2020) on
incidents of coronavirus discrimination that include being barred from establishments and transportation; coughed or spat
upon; verbally harassed; physically assaulted; harassed online; shunned; vandalized; and discriminated against in the
workplace. Political misinformation that implies a specific group is responsible for a pandemic, and “otherist” rhetoric
elevate and motivate racism and will likely have negative impacts far beyond the current crisis.
Some political leaders have been spreading misinformation with racist undertones and identifying COVID-19 and SARS-
CoV-2 as a ‘foreign,’ (CNN, 2020), ‘Chinese,’ (Fallows, 2020) ‘Wuhan,’ (King et al., 2020) and ‘Kung Flu’ (Rogers et al.,
2020) virus, while neglecting to prioritize an expeditious response and focus toward expanding public health protections and
healthcare access during the crisis (Ho, 2020). Claims that this is a typical and accepted way to name novel diseases are
incorrect (WHO, 2015), and this language has real life-threatening consequences for real people (Tavernise & Oppel Jr.,
2020). Even though certain diseases have been named after geographic areas in the past, the World Health Organization
now explicitly prohibits it to “avoid causing offence to any cultural, social, national, regional, professional or ethnic groups”
(WHO, 2015). Whatever the reasons behind this use of language are, we argue that labeling a disease in a way that targets a
group of people is a form of misinformation, however unintentional, that not only detracts from crucial public health
responses and messaging but causes further harm to population health while exacerbating health inequities.
Racism and Health
Racism and discrimination are institutionalized in the U.S. Structural racism, which reinforces discriminatory beliefs,
values, and resource distribution, has been defined as “the totality of ways in which societies foster racial discrimination
through mutually reinforcing systems of housing, education, employment, earnings, benefits, credit, media, health care,
and criminal justice” (Bailey et al., 2017). Discrimination, including microaggressions and violence, may discourage
vulnerable populations from seeking care, participating in contact tracing, or adopting public health-protective behaviors.
Furthermore, racism has been tied to negative physical and mental health impacts. Institutional and interpersonal
discrimination are determinants of health outcomes and health disparities (Davis, 2020). Adverse health outcomes
associated with various forms of racism include hypertension, diabetes, obesity, stress, and low-birth-weight (Williams et
al., 2019). According to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, in general, mortality rates for heart disease,
stroke, cancer, asthma, influenza, pneumonia, diabetes, and HIV/AIDS are disproportionately higher for Black Americans in
comparison to whites (HHS, n.d.), for instance.
Social-structural drivers of health inequities, amidst the COVID-19 pandemic, include reliance on public transit, working
on the frontline, less autonomy, reliance on more crowded living and workspaces, and the inability to work from home. Dr.
Lisa Bowleg cautions against obscuring “structural inequities that befall Black and other marginalized groups, who bear the
harshest and most disproportionate brunt of anything negative or calamitous: HIV/AIDS, hypertension, poverty, diabetes,
climate change disasters, unemployment, mass incarceration, and, now, COVID-19” (Bowleg, 2020). Disproportionate
levels of severe COVID-19 (Garg et al., 2020) and death (Ray, 2020) among Black Americans is a stark representation of
centuries of structural and cultural racism, including unequal healthcare access and quality (Feagin & Bennefield, 2014).
Some of the underlying conditions that increase the risk of severe manifestations and complications of COVID-19 are the
same adverse health outcomes associated with experiencing racism. Additionally, fear and experienced racism may also
impact the ability of Black Americans to safely participate in protective or preventative behaviors such as wearing masks
(Weingartner, 2020).
We also acknowledge the methodological challenges in measuring racism and the inadequacies of reducing race or
ethnicity to a single categorical variable. It is very likely that current research quantifying these health impacts
underestimates the health impacts of racism and the impact of self-reported experiences of discrimination on mental and
physical health (Lewis et al., 2015). In the context of COVID-19, Ruha Benjamin best describes the interconnectedness of
biological diseases and inequitable societal structures by highlighting that “the virus is not simply a biological entity, but a
biopolitical reality which travels along well-worn patterns of inequity” (Benjamin, 2020).
Asian Americans as Scapegoats: Past and Present
Discriminatory attitudes and practices toward Asians and Asian Americans within a public health context is not a new
phenomenon. In her book, Fit to be Citizens?, Natalia Molina describes: “By the 1870s, public health officials had sufficient
credibility to construct what being ‘Chinese’ meant—namely, dirty, depraved, and disease-ridden. These stereotypes, in
turn, justified segregating Chinese people so that they would not taint white city residents” (Molina, 2006). These grotesque
stereotypes and racist views continue to be reflected contemporarily through covert misinformation. The racist overtones of
past quarantine practices are reflected in Dr. Mary Sawtelle’s 1878 remarks in a medical journal suggesting Chinese
immigrants purposefully spread “germs of death to another better race” (Shah, 2003). Centuries later, these dehumanizing
views continue to survive and thrive as a result of racist misinformation campaigns, even if these are designed to deflect
blame from leadership failure. In San Francisco, Chinese residents were disparagingly characterized as vectors of infectious
disease or illness, literally quarantining them with barbed wires (Lamar, 2012), partly fueling the 1882 Chinese Exclusion Act
and prompting cruel, debilitating quarantining practices based on Sinophobic sentiments rather than empirical evidence. In
Figure 1. I Am Not a Virus, art by Korean-Swedish artist Lisa Wool-Rim Sjöblom (García, 2020)
contrast, the white residents in the same area had no movement restrictions. These are just a few examples and a reminder
of how racist rhetoric and political misinformation take hold and lead to a collective social consciousness justifying the
unthinkable human rights abuses through public policies.
Western bigotry towards Asian Americans is not a nascent phenomenon. The specter of the ‘yellow peril’ (Tchen & Yeats,
2014) loomed large then and continues today as French newspapers declared: Alerte jaune” (translation: Yellow alert) and
“Le péril jaune?” (translation: The yellow peril?) in response to COVID-19 (Thiessen, 2020). These mainstream headlines
are reflective of a societal tolerance of bigotry and discrimination towards racial and ethnic minorities. In 2003, Iris Chang
suggested that UC Berkeley’s ban on students from some Asian countries reflects the ease by which excessive fears of SARS
can contribute to discrimination against Asians (Chang, 2003). Just this February 2020 UC Berkeley University Health
Services Center apologized and removed a social media post regarding potential “common reactions” to COVID-19 after
receiving criticisms that the post normalized racism in suggesting “prejudice against people from other countries” might
constitute such a “common reaction” (Deese, 2020). This covert, inadvertent, and overt racism has inspired activism among
Asian American communities, including through arts (Figure 1).
Wet Markets and Dry Racism
This thread of misinformation-driven racism continues in the media’s discussion of ‘wet markets’ with calls to ban ‘wet
markets’(Wise, 2020) due to the risk of zoonotic diseases instead of calling for evidence-based regulations. Wet markets are
a critical part of the food systems in many countries. This paranoia may undermine the cultural and food security
importance of these markets, which play a similar role as farmers’ markets in the U.S., providing fresh produce and meat. To
make a comparison in the American context, imagine the absurdity of a Congressional legislative proposal banning farmers
markets in the U.S., particularly in areas where it is not common to find fresh food or full grocery stores. Moreover, diseases
related to food systems such as zoonotic and food-borne illnesses are not unique to the wet markets. In the U.S., deer
hunting and factory farms are associated with the spread of diseases such as tuberculosis (Sunstrum et al., 2019) and
antibiotic-resistant bacteria (Silbergeld et al., 2008), respectively. Lynteris and Fearnley trace this 21st-century emergence of
moral panic and warn against permanently closing ‘wet markets’ due to potential adverse public health outcomes, such as
bolstering unregulated black markets and destroying a food sector accounting for 30-59% of Chinese consumers’ food
supplies (Lynteris & Fearnley, 2020; Maruyama et al., 2016). While there are valid and important public health concerns
around the operation of some of these markets, these are no different than the risks associated with factory farms, etc., and
the evidence-based regulations and diplomacy are more effective tools than the otherist and racist language, attitudes, and
policy proposals.
Call to Action
We invite policymakers, government officials, scientists, and the healthcare workforce to take advantage of this moment
to reflect on potential misconceptions, acquire cultural humility and structural competencies as part of undoing the
perpetuation of intellectual and cultural colonialism. The public health and broader scientific communities should condemn
racism against Asians and Asian Americans without reservation. In our day-to-day conversations, we should call out our
loved ones, friends, and leaders any time they engage in “casual racism,” ‘jokingly’ from dinner tables, tweets, memes,
group messages, or podiums. Moreover, the critical need for engaging community members to be involved in responding to
the pandemic and any public health messaging, as Dr. Uché Blackstock underscores, has never been more urgent (King,
2020). Inclusive approach to this pandemic is the key to success, as former New York City Health Commissioner Dr. Mary
Bassett said “We are only as safe as our most vulnerable citizen” (FXB Center, 2020).
Words matter. Racist rhetoric rooted in political misinformation that vilifies entire cultures is a political leadership failure
and an affront to this nation’s public health response. Concerted efforts toward dismantling structural racism, and its impact
on population health, must be a core part of the response and addressing the impacts of this pandemic. Racist and
discriminatory rhetoric, which racializes certain diseases and health conditions, is in direct opposition to that priority and
puts lives at risk. We must speak up and hold our political and public health leadership accountable for a dignified public
discourse and equitable public health policies.
“In the end, we will remember not the words of our enemies, but the silence of our friends.
Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. (“Trumpet of Conscience”, n.d.)
2020, from
Bailey, Z., Krieger, N., Agénor, M., Graves, J., Linos, N., & Bassett, M. (2017). Structural racism and health inequities in the
USA: evidence and interventions. The Lancet, 389(10077), 1453-1463.
Benjamin, R. (2020). Black Skin, White Masks: Racism, Vulnerability & Refuting Black Patholog. Department of African
American Studies. Retrieved 20 April 2020, from
vulnerability-refuting-black-pathology (
Bowleg, L. (2020). We’re Not All in This Together: On COVID-19, Intersectionality, and Structural Inequality. American
Journal Of Public Health, 110(7), 917-917.
Chang, I. (2003). Fear of SARS, Fear of Strangers. Retrieved 14 August 2020, from
CNN. (2020). READ: Trumps Oval Office speech on the coronavirus outbreak. CNN. Retrieved 14 August 2020, from
Davis, B. (2020). Discrimination: A Social Determinant Of Health Inequities.,
Deese, K. (2020). UC Berkeley, others accused of fueling racism amid Coronavirus outbreak. TheHill. Retrieved 14 August 2020,
Fallows, J. (2020). The ‘Chinese Virus’: 2020 Time Capsule #5. The Atlantic. Retrieved 14 August 2020, from
Feagin, J., & Bennefield, Z. (2014). Systemic racism and U.S. health care. Social Science & Medicine, 103, 7-14. (
FXB Center. (2020). Dr. Mary T. Bassett’s Statement on COVID-19 for the Poor People’s Campaign. FXB Center for Health &
Human Rights | Harvard University. Retrieved 14 August 2020, from
statement-on-covid-19-for-the-poor-peoples-campaign/ (
García, S. (2020). ‘I am not a virus.’ How this artist is illustrating coronavirus-fueled racism. PBS NewsHour. Retrieved 14 August
2020, from
Garg, S., Kim, L., Whitaker, M., O’Halloran, A., Cummings, C., & Holstein, R. et al. (2020). Hospitalization Rates and
Characteristics of Patients Hospitalized with Laboratory-Confirmed Coronavirus Disease 2019 — COVID NET, 14 States, March 1–
30, 2020. Retrieved 14 August 2020, from.
HHS. Black/African American – The Office of Minority Health. Retrieved 14 August 2020, from
Ho, C. (2020). Medicaid for All Who Face the Coronavirus. Retrieved 14 August 2020, from.
King, D., Baptiste, N., Rosenberg, J., & Rosenberg, J. (2020). We shouldn’t need to explain why Trump’s “Chinese virus” tweet is
wrong. But here we are.. Mother Jones. Retrieved 14 August 2020, from
King, J. (2020). Uché Blackstock: We Must Do Better on COVID-19 Messaging in Black Communities. Mother Jones. Retrieved 14
August 2020, from
black-communities/ (
Kramer, A., Guillory, J., & Hancock, J. (2014). Experimental evidence of massive-scale emotional contagion through social
networks. Proceedings Of The National Academy Of Sciences, 111(24), 8788-8790.
Lamar, C. (2012). In 1900, San Francisco’s Chinatown was quarantined with barbed wire fences. io9. Retrieved 14 August 2020,
Lewis, T., Cogburn, C., & Williams, D. (2015). Self-Reported Experiences of Discrimination and Health: Scientific Advances,
Ongoing Controversies, and Emerging Issues. Annual Review Of Clinical Psycholog, 11(1), 407-440. (
Lynteris, C., & Fearnley, L. (2020). Why shutting down Chinese ‘wet markets’ could be a terrible mistake. The Conversation.
Retrieved 14 August 2020, from
mistake-130625 (
Maruyama, M., Wu, L., & Huang, L. (2016). The modernization of fresh food retailing in China: The role of consumers.
Journal Of Retailing And Consumer Services, 30, 33-39.
Molina, N. (2006). Fit to Be Citizens?. University of California Press. Retrieved 14 August 2020, from (
Newman, B., Merolla, J., Shah, S., Lemi, D., Collingwood, L., & Ramakrishnan, S. (2020). The Trump Effect: An Experimental
Investigation of the Emboldening Effect of Racially Inflammatory Elite Communication. British Journal Of Political Science, 1-
22. (
Ray, R. (2020). Why are Blacks dying at higher rates from COVID-19?. Brookings. Retrieved 14 August 2020, from
Rogers, K., Jakes, L., & Swanson, A. (2020). Trump Defends Using ‘Chinese Virus’ Label, Ignoring Growing Criticism. Retrieved 14 August 2020, from
Shah, H. (2003). Asian Culture” and Asian American Identities in the Television and Film Industries of the United States. Retrieved 14 August 2020, from
Silbergeld, E., Graham, J., & Price, L. (2008). Industrial Food Animal Production, Antimicrobial Resistance, and Human
Health. Annual Review Of Public Health, 29(1), 151-169.
COUNCIL. Retrieved 14 August 2020, from
Sunstrum, J., Shoyinka, A., Power, L., Maxwell, D., Stobierski, M., & Signs, K. et al. (2019). Notes from the Field: Zoonotic
Mycobacterium bovis Disease in Deer Hunters — Michigan, 2002–2017. Retrieved 14 August 2020, from.
Tavernise, S., & Oppel Jr., R. (2020). Spit On, Yelled At, Attacked: Chinese-Americans Fear for Their Safety.
Retrieved 14 August 2020, from
Tchen, J., & Yeats, D. (2014). Yellow Peril: 19th-Century Scapegoating. Asian American Writers’ Workshop. Retrieved 14 August
2020, from (
Thiessen, T. (2020). France In Grips Of Racism Epidemic, As Coronavirus Fans Anti-Asian Hysteria. Forbes. Retrieved 14 August
2020, from
fans-anti-asian-hysteria/#4c23980452d7 (
Trumpet of Conscience. The Martin Luther King, Jr., Research and Education Institute. Retrieved 14 August 2020, from
Weingartner, T. (2020). For Black Americans, Following CDC Mask Guidelines Can Be A Fraught Decision. Retrieved
14 August 2020, from
decision#stream/0 (
WHO. (2015). WHO | WHO best practices for naming of new human infectious diseases. Retrieved 14 August 2020, from
Williams, D., Lawrence, J., & Davis, B. (2019). Racism and Health: Evidence and Needed Research. Annual Review of Public
Health, 40(1), 105-125. (
Wise, J. (2020). Bipartisan lawmakers call for global ‘wet markets’ ban amid coronavirus crisis. TheHill. Retrieved 14 August 2020,
coronaviru (
Yore, H. (2020). Coronavirus and HIV Parallels: On Racializing and Queering Illness. Retrieved 14 August 2020,
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Full-text available
Since SARS-CoV-2, the novel coronavirus that causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), was first detected in December 2019 (1), approximately 1.3 million cases have been reported worldwide (2), including approximately 330,000 in the United States (3). To conduct population-based surveillance for laboratory-confirmed COVID-19-associated hospitalizations in the United States, the COVID-19-Associated Hospitalization Surveillance Network (COVID-NET) was created using the existing infrastructure of the Influenza Hospitalization Surveillance Network (FluSurv-NET) (4) and the Respiratory Syncytial Virus Hospitalization Surveillance Network (RSV-NET). This report presents age-stratified COVID-19-associated hospitalization rates for patients admitted during March 1-28, 2020, and clinical data on patients admitted during March 1-30, 2020, the first month of U.S. surveillance. Among 1,482 patients hospitalized with COVID-19, 74.5% were aged ≥50 years, and 54.4% were male. The hospitalization rate among patients identified through COVID-NET during this 4-week period was 4.6 per 100,000 population. Rates were highest (13.8) among adults aged ≥65 years. Among 178 (12%) adult patients with data on underlying conditions as of March 30, 2020, 89.3% had one or more underlying conditions; the most common were hypertension (49.7%), obesity (48.3%), chronic lung disease (34.6%), diabetes mellitus (28.3%), and cardiovascular disease (27.8%). These findings suggest that older adults have elevated rates of COVID-19-associated hospitalization and the majority of persons hospitalized with COVID-19 have underlying medical conditions. These findings underscore the importance of preventive measures (e.g., social distancing, respiratory hygiene, and wearing face coverings in public settings where social distancing measures are difficult to maintain)† to protect older adults and persons with underlying medical conditions, as well as the general public. In addition, older adults and persons with serious underlying medical conditions should avoid contact with persons who are ill and immediately contact their health care provider(s) if they have symptoms consistent with COVID-19 ( (5). Ongoing monitoring of hospitalization rates, clinical characteristics, and outcomes of hospitalized patients will be important to better understand the evolving epidemiology of COVID-19 in the United States and the clinical spectrum of disease, and to help guide planning and prioritization of health care system resources.
Full-text available
This article explores the effect of explicitly racial and inflammatory speech by political elites on mass citizens in a societal context where equality norms are widespread and generally heeded yet a subset of citizens nonetheless possesses deeply ingrained racial prejudices. The authors argue that such speech should have an ‘emboldening effect’ among the prejudiced, particularly where it is not clearly and strongly condemned by other elite political actors. To test this argument, the study focuses on the case of the Trump campaign for president in the United States, and utilizes a survey experiment embedded within an online panel study. The results demonstrate that in the absence of prejudiced elite speech, prejudiced citizens constrain the expression of their prejudice. However, in the presence of prejudiced elite speech – particularly when it is tacitly condoned by other elites – the study finds that the prejudiced are emboldened to both express and act upon their prejudices.
Full-text available
In recent decades, there has been remarkable growth in scientific research examining the multiple ways in which racism can adversely affect health. This interest has been driven in part by the striking persistence of racial/ethnic inequities in health and the empirical evidence that indicates that socioeconomic factors alone do not account for racial/ethnic inequities in health. Racism is considered a fundamental cause of adverse health outcomes for racial/ethnic minorities and racial/ethnic inequities in health. This article provides an overview of the evidence linking the primary domains of racism - structural racism, cultural racism, and individual-level discrimination - to mental and physical health outcomes. For each mechanism, we describe key findings and identify priorities for future research. We also discuss evidence for interventions to reduce racism and describe research needed to advance knowledge in this area.
Full-text available
Over the past two decades, research examining the impact of self-reported experiences of discrimination on mental and physical health has increased dramatically. Studies have found consistent associations between exposure to discrimination and a wide range of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)-diagnosed mental disorders as well as objective physical health outcomes. Associations are seen in cross-sectional as well as longitudinal studies and persist even after adjustment for confounding variables, including personality characteristics and other threats to validity. However, controversies remain, particularly around the best approach to measuring experiences of discrimination, the significance of racial/ethnic discrimination versus overall mistreatment, the need to account for "intersectionalities", and the importance of comprehensive assessments. These issues are discussed in detail, along with emerging areas of emphasis including cyber discrimination, anticipatory stress or vigilance around discrimination, and interventions with potential to reduce the negative effects of discrimination on health. We also discuss priorities for future research and implications for interventions and policy. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Clinical Psychology Volume 11 is March 28, 2015. Please see for revised estimates.
Full-text available
Emotional states can be transferred to others via emotional contagion, leading people to experience the same emotions without their awareness. Emotional contagion is well established in laboratory experiments, with people transferring positive and negative emotions to others. Data from a large real-world social network, collected over a 20-y period suggests that longer-lasting moods (e.g., depression, happiness) can be transferred through networks [Fowler JH, Christakis NA (2008) BMJ 337:a2338], although the results are controversial. In an experiment with people who use Facebook, we test whether emotional contagion occurs outside of in-person interaction between individuals by reducing the amount of emotional content in the News Feed. When positive expressions were reduced, people produced fewer positive posts and more negative posts; when negative expressions were reduced, the opposite pattern occurred. These results indicate that emotions expressed by others on Facebook influence our own emotions, constituting experimental evidence for massive-scale contagion via social networks. This work also suggests that, in contrast to prevailing assumptions, in-person interaction and nonverbal cues are not strictly necessary for emotional contagion, and that the observation of others' positive experiences constitutes a positive experience for people.
Full-text available
Antimicrobial resistance is a major public health crisis, eroding the discovery of antimicrobials and their application to clinical medicine. There is a general lack of knowledge of the importance of agricultural antimicrobial use as a factor in antimicrobial resistance even among experts in medicine and public health. This review focuses on agricultural antimicrobial drug use as a major driver of antimicrobial resistance worldwide for four reasons: It is the largest use of antimicrobials worldwide; much of the use of antimicrobials in agriculture results in subtherapeutic exposures of bacteria; drugs of every important clinical class are utilized in agriculture; and human populations are exposed to antimicrobial-resistant pathogens via consumption of animal products as well as through widespread release into the environment.
Despite growing interest in understanding how social factors drive poor health outcomes, many academics, policy makers, scientists, elected officials, journalists, and others responsible for defining and responding to the public discourse remain reluctant to identify racism as a root cause of racial health inequities. In this conceptual report, the third in a Series on equity and equality in health in the USA, we use a contemporary and historical perspective to discuss research and interventions that grapple with the implications of what is known as structural racism on population health and health inequities. Structural racism refers to the totality of ways in which societies foster racial discrimination through mutually reinforcing systems of housing, education, employment, earnings, benefits, credit, media, health care, and criminal justice. These patterns and practices in turn reinforce discriminatory beliefs, values, and distribution of resources. We argue that a focus on structural racism offers a concrete, feasible, and promising approach towards advancing health equity and improving population health.
Since 2002, the Chinese government has initiated the “Wet Market Transforming into Food Supermarket (WMTFS)” program that aims to transform the traditional fresh food retailing system into a more efficient system that adopts a supermarket operation mode. However, after years of effort, the process of implementing the WMTFS program has been painfully slow. In addition to several supply side factors, this paper focuses on the consumer demand side using survey data in three large Chinese cities to identify the factors affecting consumers' decisions to buy fresh food from traditional vs modern retail formats. It further explores regional differences in consumers' shopping behavior. We find that freshness, accessibility, and whether buyers can bargain are influencing factors and the effects of socioeconomic factors such as income and storage facility are very limited. In addition, we find regional difference exists in consumers' retail format preferences. We suggested that managers of fresh food supermarket should enhance product freshness and safety in the future. Meanwhile, since traditional retail formats are still preferred by many consumers, the policy-makers should give a further thinking on the specific way of transformation.
"Asian" culture has long been fodder for films and television shows produced in the United States. Four main stereotypes of Asians and Asian Americans emerged from the imagination of primarily white cultural producers in Hollywood: "Yellow Peril," "Dragon Lady," "Charlie Chan," and "Lotus Blossom." These images can be understood as "controlling images" in the sense that negative stereotypes provide justifications for social control and positive stereotypes provide normative models for Asian thought and behavior. Resistance to these images became substantial in the 1960s when Asian American filmmakers developed "triangular cinema," a strategy for Asian American community building, political mobilization, and the creation of an Asian American film aesthetic. The films of triangular cinema are "liberating images" that stake out a position for independence and autonomy for Asian American communities.