ArticlePublisher preview available

Process evaluation of dialectical behavior therapy dissemination: Knowledge retention and recursive training effects

Authors:
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the authors.

Abstract and Figures

Dialectical behavior therapy (DBT) can be challenging to implement with fidelity to the model. Residential treatment settings are frequently overlooked as sites of implementation for DBT despite the potential benefits. This mixed-methods process evaluation examines the impact of DBT training in five residential programs on provider DBT-specific knowledge, staff turnover rates, and staff perceptions of training impact on their practice. Post-training staff knowledge levels varied considerably, but on average demonstrated substantial DBT-related knowledge retention. Staff turnover rates did not change significantly in four of five programs despite showing an overall trend in reduction. Qualitative results suggest substantial recursive training effects consistent with the DBT model. Themes emerged related to the impact of the training on effectiveness of practice with clients, application of DBT skills in staff personal lives, and positive effects on program culture. Results have implications for better understanding the mechanisms of successful dissemination of DBT across treatment settings.
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
Process evaluation of dialectical behavior therapy dissemination:
Knowledge retention and recursive training effects
Amber M. Holbrook
1
&Susan R. Hunt
2
&Mary Renata See
3
Accepted: 25 September 2020 / Published online: 6 October 2020
#Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020
Abstract
Dialectical behavior therapy (DBT) can bechallenging to implement with fidelity tothe model. Residential treatment settings are
frequently overlooked as sites of implementation for DBT despite the potential benefits. This mixed-methods process evaluation
examines the impact of DBT training in five residential programs on provider DBT-specific knowledge, staff turnover rates, and
staff perceptions of training impact on their practice.
Post-training staff knowledge levels varied considerably, but on average demonstrated substantial DBT-related knowledge
retention. Staff turnover rates did not change significantly in four of five programs despite showing an overall trend in reduction.
Qualitative results suggest substantial recursive training effects consistent with the DBT model. Themes emerged related to the
impact of the training on effectiveness of practice with clients, application of DBT skills in staff personal lives, and positive
effects on program culture. Results have implications for better understanding the mechanisms of successful dissemination of
DBT across treatment settings.
Keywords Dialectical behavior therapy .Evidence-based practice .Implementation research .Process evaluation .
Implementation science
Background and Significance
Residential treatment settings are often overlooked as poten-
tial sites for provision of evidence-based interventions (James
et al. 2013). Although diverse in their structures and therapeu-
tic approaches, residential settings typically offer a 24-h, mul-
tidisciplinary care environment to clients when the acuity of
their behavioral health disorders or difficulty with daily living
skills do not permit maintenance in a less-structured setting
(Abt Associates 2008). Implementation of evidence-based
practices (EBPs) such as dialectical behavior therapy (DBT),
in residential programs that service individuals with mental
health disorders has the potential to increase the quality and
efficacy of care for this population.
DBT is a comprehensive, specialized adaptation of cogni-
tive behavioral therapy, originally developed for the treatment
of borderline personality disorder. Effective in reducing sui-
cidal and parasuicidal behaviors, while simultaneously in-
creasing treatment retention (Neacsiu et al. 2010;Panos
et al. 2014; Soler et al. 2009; Swenson et al. 2002), DBT aims
to both decrease quality-of-life interfering behaviors and en-
hance behavioral skills such as emotional regulation, distress
tolerance, and interpersonal skills (Feigenbaum 2007;
Linehan 1993). DBT has been found effective in increasing
mindfulness while decreasing symptoms of depression and
anxiety in individuals participating in partial hospitalization
services (Lothes et al. 2016; Mochrie et al. 2019). More re-
cently, emerging evidence supports DBTs effectiveness in
treating bipolar disorder (Van Dijk et al. 2013), co-occurring
substance abuse disorders (van den Bosch et al. 2002), and
binge eating disorders (Lenz et al. 2014; Telch et al. 2001).
Wolpow et al. (2000) suggests that the therapeutic tenets
and delivery structure of DBT may be an especially good fit
with the psychiatric rehabilitation approach implemented by
many programs serving adults with chronic mental illness. In
addition to the potential to assist clients with co-morbid psy-
chological and personality disorders who populate residential
treatment programs due to the difficulty of managing
*Amber M. Holbrook
aholbrook@wcupa.edu
1
Graduate Department of Social Work, West Chester University,
Anderson Hall, West Chester, PA 19383, USA
2
Resources for Human Development, Inc, 4700 Wissahickon Avenue,
Philadelphia, PA 19144, USA
3
West Chester University, Anderson Hall, West Chester, PA 19383,
USA
Current Psychology (2022) 41:60146023
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-01095-3
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
Background: Dialectical behaviour therapy (DBT) is a third wave behaviour therapy combining behaviour based components with elements of mindfulness. Although DBT effectiveness has been explored, relatively little attention has been given to its implementation. Frameworks are often the basis for gathering information about implementation and can also direct how the implementation of an intervention is conducted. Using existing implementation frameworks, this critical literature review scoped the DBT implementation literature to develop and refine a bespoke DBT implementation framework. Method and results: The initial framework was developed by consolidating existing implementation frameworks and published guidance on DBT implementation. The critical literature review retrieved papers from Medline, CINAHL, PsycInfo, PubMed, and the reference lists of included papers. Framework elements were used as codes which were applied to the literature and guided the synthesis. Findings from the synthesis refined the framework.The critical literature review retrieved 60 papers but only 14 of these explicitly focused on implementation. The DBT implementation framework captured all the execution barriers and facilitators described in the literature. However, the evidence synthesis led to a more parsimonious framework as some elements (e.g., research and published guidance) were seldom discussed in DBT implementation. Conclusion: To our knowledge this is the first published review exploring DBT implementation. The literature synthesis suggests some tentative recommendations which warrant further exploration. For instance, if DBT implementation is not pre-planned, having someone in the organisation who champions DBT can be advantageous. However, as the literature is limited and has methodological limitations, further prospective studies of DBT implementation are needed.
Article
Full-text available
Objective: Comorbid mental health and substance use problems are highly prevalent in substance use treatment settings and generally lead to poorer treatment outcomes. Pathways to Comorbidity Care (PCC) is a multimodal training program developed to encourage an integrated service approach to improve clinicians capacity to identify and manage comorbid substance use and mental health outcomes within public drug and alcohol treatment settings. Methods: In this paper we describe the concepts underlying the PCC package and the use of implementation science to assess and overcome potential barriers, including clinicians preferences, knowledge about best practice, and professional culture. Results: The training components include didactic seminars, group workshops run by a local clinical champion on relevant subjects such as motivational interviewing and cognitive behavioral therapy, individual clinical consultation, and feedback with a senior clinical psychologist. The PCC also includes an online portal containing comorbidity resources including manuals, guidelines, and booster webinars. Finally, we describe the evaluation of PCC implementation. Conclusions: Drug and alcohol services need to be equipped to treat the majority of comorbid mental health conditions in their clients. We anticipate that this multimodal training package, which applies the principles of implementation science, will facilitate effective and integrated care for these vulnerable clients.
Article
Full-text available
The use of dialectical behavioral therapy (DBT) among a variety of programs and patients has recently exploded. Of particular interest is the use of DBT in partial hospital (PH) programs due to the high number of severely ill and suicidal patients who participate in these programs. Recently, Lothes, Mochrie and St. John (2014) examined data from a local DBT-informed PH program and found significant reductions in depression, anxiety, hopelessness, and degree of suffering from intake to discharge. The present study examined these same four symptom constructs by assessing intake and discharge data for additional individuals enrolled in this DBT-informed PH program. In addition, lengths of stay and acuity ratings were analyzed to explore the relationship between these variables and symptom constructs. Significant symptom reduction in depression, anxiety, hopelessness, and degree of suffering from intake to discharge was found among high and medium acuity patients, replicating the results of Lothes et al. (2014). Further, individuals with the highest acuity saw the largest reduction in hopelessness symptoms the longer they participated in the program (i.e., a significant interaction effect between acuity and length of stay). This is meaningful given the connection between hopelessness and suicidal ideation/action, which is of particular concern for those charged with treating clinical populations. DBT-informed PH programs may be a cost-effective and useful way to treat high-risk patients who come from inpatient facilities. Future studies may wish to create follow-up periods (i.e., 3 months, 6 months) post-discharge to assess if symptom reduction remains.
Article
Full-text available
The current paper discusses an approach to measuring treatment integrity of Dialectical Behavioral Therapy (DBT) when implemented within two programs providing services to street-involved youth in the community. Measuring treatment integrity is a critical component of effective implementation of evidence-based interventions in clinical practice, since sound treatment integrity increases confidence in client outcomes and intervention replicability. Despite being an essential part of implementation science, few studies report on treatment integrity, with limited research addressing either measurement tools or maintenance of treatment integrity. To address the lack of available treatment integrity measures, researchers in the current study developed and piloted a treatment integrity measure which pertain to the individual and group components of DBT. A total of 20 recordings were assessed using the treatment integrity measures. Results indicate that the community agency staff (e.g. youth workers, social workers & nurses) implemented the intervention as intended; increasing confidence in the outcome variables, the staffs’ training and the replicability of the intervention. This article offers one approach to addressing treatment integrity when implementing evidence-based interventions, such as DBT in a community setting, and discusses the need for effective and feasible integrity measures that can be adopted in order to strengthen mental health practice in community settings.
Article
Full-text available
Dialectical behavior therapy was originally developed from early efforts to apply standard behavior therapy to treat individuals who were highly suicidal. Its development was a trial and error effort driven primarily from clinical experience. Dialectical behavior therapy is a modular and hierarchical treatment consisting of a combination of individual psychotherapy, group skills, training, telephone coaching, and a therapist consultation team. The inherent modularity and hierarchical structure of DBT has allowed for relative ease in adapting and applying the treatment to other populations and settings. New skills have been developed and/or modified due to clinical need and/or advancement in research such as treatment outcomes or mechanisms. There has been an effort to implement DBT skills as a standalone treatment. More research is needed to assess how DBT skills work and for whom. As DBT broadens its reach, the treatment will continue to grow and adapt to meet demands of an evolving clinical landscape.
Article
Full-text available
Article
Full-text available
Objective The objective was to quantitatively and qualitatively examine the efficacy of DBT (e.g., decreasing life-threatening suicidal and parasuicidal acts, attrition, and depression) explicitly with borderline personality disorder (BPD) and using conservative assumptions and criteria, across treatment providers and settings. Method Five randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified in a systematic search that examined the efficacy of DBT in reducing suicide attempts, parasuicidal behavior, attrition during treatment, or symptoms of depression, in adult patients with BPD. Results Combining effect measures for suicide and parasuicidal behavior (five studies total) revealed a net benefit in favor of DBT (pooled Hedges’ g −0.622). DBT was only marginally better than treatment as usual (TAU) in reducing attrition during treatment in five RCTs (pooled risk difference −0.168). DBT was not significantly different from TAU in reducing depression symptoms in three RCTs (pooled Hedges’ g −0.896). Discussion DBT demonstrates efficacy in stabilizing and controlling self-destructive behavior and improving patient compliance.
Article
Objective Preliminarily findings suggest dialectical behavior therapy (DBT)‐informed partial hospital (PH) programs can reduce patient symptoms. The present study assessed changes in various mental health symptoms as well as mindfulness skill acquisition in relation to these outcomes in a DBT‐informed PH program. Method Participants included 212 adults, ages 18–66 (Mean = 35.63, Standard Deviation = 12.39). The sample was predominantly female (N = 140, 66.00%) and Caucasian (N = 185, 87.30%). Results Findings showed significant symptom reduction (i.e., depression, anxiety, hopelessness, and degree of suffering) from intake to discharge. Overall mindfulness skill acquisition significantly increased from intake to discharge, and specific scales of mindfulness acquisition accounted for significant proportions of the variance in symptom reduction for depression and anxiety. Conclusions Mindfulness skill acquisition may be a mechanism by which DBT impacts symptom reduction in PH settings. Future studies might examine mindfulness practice to determine optimum doses.
Article
Forging a professional identity is commonly assumed to be a key objective for new graduates transitioning to work. However, the extant literature on professional identity development gives minimal consideration to the role of contemporary work conditions such as increased contract-based employment and occupational instability in carving out a work identity. These workforce trends are particularly pronounced in the non-government community services sector, where worker mobility is high and workers often occupy roles that are not profession-specific. In light of these trends, this article seeks to broaden existing understandings of professional identity development. Focus groups were conducted with 24 newly qualified workers with degree-level qualifications in social work and the human services employed in the community services sector in Queensland. The findings suggest that these workers held a variety of allegiances, which were not necessarily aligned with a profession but instead shaped by the interplay of personal, professional, and organisational factors.