ArticlePDF Available

Violence Against Healthcare Workers: A Worldwide Phenomenon With Serious Consequences

Authors:
OPINION
published: 18 September 2020
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.570459
Frontiers in Public Health | www.frontiersin.org 1September 2020 | Volume 8 | Article 570459
Edited by:
Amelia Kekeletso Ranotsi,
Maluti Adventist College, Lesotho
Reviewed by:
Jacques Oosthuizen,
Edith Cowan University, Australia
Gabriele D’Ettorre,
ASL Lecce, Italy
*Correspondence:
Sandro Vento
svento@puthisastra.edu.kh;
ventosandro@yahoo.it
Specialty section:
This article was submitted to
Public Health Policy,
a section of the journal
Frontiers in Public Health
Received: 08 June 2020
Accepted: 14 August 2020
Published: 18 September 2020
Citation:
Vento S, Cainelli F and Vallone A
(2020) Violence Against Healthcare
Workers: A Worldwide Phenomenon
With Serious Consequences.
Front. Public Health 8:570459.
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.570459
Violence Against Healthcare
Workers: A Worldwide Phenomenon
With Serious Consequences
Sandro Vento 1
*, Francesca Cainelli 1,2 and Alfredo Vallone 3
1Faculty of Medicine, University of Puthisastra, Phnom Penh, Cambodia, 2Raffles Medical Group Clinic, Phnom Penh,
Cambodia, 3Infectious Diseases Unit, G. Jazzolino Hospital, Vibo Valentia, Italy
Keywords: violence, healthcare worker (HCW), doctor-patient relationship, nurse-patient relationship, workplace
INTRODUCTION
Verbal and physical violence against healthcare workers (HCWs) have reached considerable levels
worldwide, and the World Medical Association has most recently defined violence against health
personnel “an international emergency that undermines the very foundations of health systems
and impacts critically on patient’s health” (1). Two systematic reviews and meta-analyses published
at the end of 2019 found a high prevalence of workplace violence by patients and visitors against
nurses and physicians (2), and show that occupational violence against HCWs in dental healthcare
centers is not uncommon (3).
RECENT STUDIES
In the first study (2), the authors systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science
from their inception to October 2018, and included 253 eligible studies (with a total of 331,544
participants). 61.9% of the participants reported exposure to any form of workplace violence,
42.5% reported exposure to non-physical violence, and 24.4% experienced physical violence in the
past year. Verbal abuse (57.6%) was the most common form of non-physical violence, followed
by threats (33.2%) and sexual harassment (12.4%). The prevalence of violence against HCWs
was particularly high in Asian and North American countries, in Psychiatric and Emergency
departments, and among nurses and physicians (2).
In the second study (3), a systematic review and analysis of the literature was done using
PubMed, ScienceDirect, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and ProQuest. Original articles
published between January 1992 and August 2019 and written in English were included in the
analysis. The violence experienced by dental healthcare workers was both physical and non-
physical (shouting, bullying, and threatening) and also included sexual harassment (3), and in most
cases, male patients, or coworkers were responsible. Violent events ranged from 15.0 to 54.0% with
a mean prevalence of 32%, and physical abuse ranged from 4.6 to 22% (3).
Most recently, the World Medical Association has condemned the increasingly reported cases
of health care workers being attacked because of the fear that they will spread SARS-CoV-2.
The situation in India is particularly shocking, with health care workers stigmatized, ostracized,
discriminated against, and physically attacked, but incidents have been reported across the world,
for instance from France, Mexico, Philippines, Turkey, UK, Australia, and USA (4,5).
DISCUSSION
The recent systematic reviews and meta-analyses and the World Health Organization
condemnation of the attacks against HCWs treating patients with COVID-19 have confirmed
Vento et al. Worldwide Violence Against Healthcare Workers
the seriousness of the situation regarding violence against doctors
and nurses worldwide. Many countries have reported cases of
violence, and some are particularly affected by this problem. A
Chinese Hospital Association survey collecting data from 316
hospitals revealed that 96% of the hospitals surveyed experienced
workplace violence in 2012 (6), and a study done by the Chinese
Medical Doctor Association in 2014 showed that over 70% of
physicians ever experienced verbal abuse or physical injuries
at work (7). An examination of all legal cases on violence
against health professionals and facilities from the criminal
ligation records 2010–2016, released by the Supreme Court of
China, found that beating, pushing, verbal abuse, threatening,
blocking hospital gates, and doors, smashing hospital property
were frequently reported types of violence (8). In India, violence
against healthcare workers and damage to healthcare facilities has
become a debated issue at various levels (9), and the government
has made violence against HCWs an offense punishable by up
to 7 years imprisonment, after various episodes of violence and
harassment of HCWs involved in COVID-19 care or contact
tracing (10). In Germany, severe aggression or violence has been
experienced by 23% of primary care physicians (11). In Spain,
there has been an increase in the magnitude of the phenomenon
in recent years (12). In the UK, a Health Service Journal and
UNISON research found that 181 NHS Trusts in England
reported 56,435 physical assaults on staff in 2016–2017 (13).
In the USA, 70–74% of workplace assaults occur in healthcare
settings (14). In Italy, in just one year, 50% of nurses were verbally
assaulted in the workplace, 11% experienced physical violence,
4% were threatened with a weapon (15); 50% of physicians were
verbally, and 4% physically, assaulted (16). In Poland, Czech
Republic, Slovakia, Turkey many nurses have been physically
attacked or verbally abused in the workplace (17). According to
the South African Medical Association, over 30 hospitals across
South Africa reported serious security incidents in just 5 months
in 2019 (18), and in Cape Town violence against ambulance crews
is widespread (19). In Iran, the prevalence of physical or verbal
workplace violence against emergency medical services personnel
is 36 and 73% respectively (20). The World Health Organization
lists Australia, Brazil, Bulgaria, Lebanon, Mozambique, Portugal,
Thailand as other countries where studies on violence directed at
HCWs have been conducted (21).
The consequences of violence against HCWs can be very
serious: deaths or life-threatening injuries (15), reduced
work interest, job dissatisfaction, decreased retention, more
leave days, impaired work functioning (22), depression,
post-traumatic stress disorder (23), decline of ethical
values, increased practice of defensive medicine (24).
Workplace violence is associated directly with higher
incidence of burnout, lower patient safety, and more adverse
events (25).
Which are the most at-risk services and what are the
underlying factors of this growing violence? Emergency
Departments, Mental Health Units, Drug and Alcohol Clinics,
Ambulance services and remote Health Posts with insufficient
security and a single HCW are at higher risk. Working in
remote health care areas, understaffing, emotional or mental
stress of patients or visitors, insufficient security, and lack of
preventative measures have been identified as underlying factors
of violence against physicians in a 2019 systematic review and
meta-analysis (26).
In public hospital/services, insufficient time devoted to
patients and therefore insufficient communication between
HCWs and patients, long waiting times, and overcrowding in
waiting areas (27), lack of trust in HCWs or in the healthcare
system, dissatisfaction with treatment or care provided (26),
degree of staff professionalism, unacceptable comments of staff
members, and unrealistic expectations of patients and families
over treatment success (28) are thought to contribute. Indeed,
in public hospitals worldwide, staff shortages prevent front-line
HCWs from adequately coping with patients’ demands. In private
hospitals/services, too extended hospital stays, unexpectedly high
bills, prescription of expensive and unnecessary investigations are
key factors. Finally, the media frequently report extreme cases
of possible malpractice and portray them as representative of
“normal” practice in hospitals (24).
What can be done to reduce the escalating violence against
HCWs? HCWs worldwide generally advocate for more severe
laws, but harsher penalties alone are unlikely to solve the
problem. Importantly, evidence on the efficacy of interventions
to prevent aggression against doctors is lacking, and a systematic
review and meta-analysis found that only few studies have
provided such evidence (29). Just one randomized controlled
trial indicated that a violence prevention program decreased
the risks of patient-to-worker violence and of related injury
in hospitals (30), whereas contrasting results in violence rates
after implementation of workplace violence prevention programs
have been observed from longitudinal studies (29). There is no
evidence on the effectiveness of good place design and work
policies aimed to reduce long waiting times or crowding in
waiting areas (29). More studies are clearly needed to provide
evidence-based recommendations, and interdisciplinary research
with the involvement of anthropologists, sociologists, and
psychologists should be encouraged. However, certain measures
have to be taken and can be corrected, should they be shown as
ineffective in properly conducted studies.
Security measures have been advocated for years (31) and
should be taken to safeguard particularly the most at-risk
services. First, staff shortages, so common in public hospitals
worldwide, should be acted upon, and increased funding should
be allocated to employ more doctors and nurses. Hence,
the duration of each patient encounter would be augmented,
particularly in overburdened public hospitals, allowing the (often
young) (32) doctors to develop a meaningful relationship with
the patient. Second, healthcare organizations and universities
should considerably improve the communication skills of
current and future HCWs to reduce unrealistic expectations
or misunderstanding of patients and families. Third, HCWs
who denounce any verbal or physical violence should be fully
supported by their healthcare organizations; this would reduce
the huge issue of under-reporting of workplace violence (33,34).
Good courses should be organized for HCWs to learn how to
identify early signs that somebody may become violent, how to
manage dangerous situations, and how to protect themselves.
Prompt communication about delays in service provision
should be given to patients and their relatives when waiting
times are long because certain conditions are prioritized. Alarms
Frontiers in Public Health | www.frontiersin.org 2September 2020 | Volume 8 | Article 570459
Vento et al. Worldwide Violence Against Healthcare Workers
and closed-circuit televisions should be placed in the higher-risk
departments and in areas where doctors and/or nurses work in
isolation. Sanctioning of violence by patients, relatives or visitors
must be imposed. Staff should be increased and security officers
should be placed, particularly at night, in remote Health Posts
and Emergency Departments and at particular times (violence
tends to happen in the evenings/nights, when more patients
under the influence of drugs and alcohol present); the number
of night shifts should be limited (23). Efforts should be made
to improve job satisfaction of HCWs (25). Finally, media should
cease to contribute to the general public’s distrust toward HCWs
and institutions. Many patients report their negative experiences
of medical care to news or media outlets which are highly
interested in these stories and very often do not check the
information before publishing it (24). These biased media reports
may exacerbate the tension.
All workers have a right to be safe on their job, and
healthcare workers are no exception. The idea that violence
is inherent to doctors and nurses’ work, especially in certain
departments, needs to be fought; urgent measures must be
implemented to ensure the safety of all HCWs in their
environment, and the needed resources must be allocated. Failure
to do so will worsen the care that they are employed to
deliver and will ultimately negatively affect the whole healthcare
system worldwide.
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
SV had the idea of writing the manuscript and drafted it.
FC co-drafted the manuscript. AV contributed to the drafting,
and reviewed the manuscript. All the authors approved the
final version.
REFERENCES
1. World Medical Association. 73rd World Health Assembly, Agenda Item 3:
Covid-19 Pandemic Response. (2020). Available online at: https://www.wma.
net/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/WHA73-WMA-statement-on- Covid-19-
pandemic-response- .pdf (accessed June 7, 2020).
2. Liu J, Gan Y, Jiang H, Li L, Dwyer R, Lu K, et al. Prevalence of workplace
violence against healthcare workers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Occup Environ Med. (2019) 76:927–37. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2019-105849
3. Binmadi NO, Alblowi JA. Prevalence and policy of occupational violence
against oral healthcare workers: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC
Oral Health. (2019) 19:279. doi: 10.1186/s12903-019-0974-3
4. World Medical Association Condemns Attacks on Health Care Professionals.
(2020). Available online at: https://www.wma.net/news-post/world-medical-
association-condemns-attacks-on- health-care- professionals/ (accessed June
7, 2020).
5. McKay D, Heisler M, Mishori R, Catton H, Kloiber O. Attacks
against health-care personnel must stop, especially as the world fights
COVID-19. Lancet. (2020) 395:1743–5. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)3
1191-0
6. Yao S, Zeng Q, Peng M, Ren S, Chen G, Wang J. Stop
violence against medical workers in China. J Thorac Dis. (2014)
6:E141–5. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2014.06.10
7. Yang SZ, Wu D, Wang N, Hesketh T, Sun KS, Li L, et al. Workplace
violence and its aftermath in China’s health sector: implications from a cross-
sectional survey across three tiers of the health system. BMJ Open. (2019)
9:e031513. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031513
8. Li N, Wang Z, Dear K. Violence against health professionals and facilities in
China: evidence from criminal litigation records. J Forensic Leg Med. (2019)
67:1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2019.07.006
9. Chauhan V, Galwankar S, Kumar R, Raina SK, Aggarwal P, Agrawalet N, et al.
The 2017 Academic College of Emergency Experts and Academy of Family
Physicians of India position statement on preventing violence against health-
care workers and vandalization of health-care facilities in India. Int J Crit Illn
Inj Sci. (2017) 7:79–83. doi: 10.4103/IJCIIS.IJCIIS_28_17
10. Covid-19: Indian government vows to protect healthcare workers from
violence amid rising cases. BMJ. (2020) 369:m1631. doi: 10.1136/bmj.
m1631
11. Vorderwülbecke F, Feistle M, Mehring M, Schneider A, Linde K. Aggression
and violence against primary care physicians - a nationwide questionnaire
survey. Dtsch Arztebl Int. (2015) 112:159–65. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.201
5.0159
12. Serrano Vicente MI, Fernández Rodrigo MT, Satústegui Dordá PJ, Urcola
Pardo F. Agresiones a profesionales del sector sanitario en España, revisión
sistemática. [Aggression to health care personnel in Spain: a systematic
review]. Rev Esp Salud Publica. (2019) 93:e201910097.
13. Andy Cowper. Violence Against NHS Staff: A Special Report by HSJ
and Unison. (2018). Available online at: https://guides.hsj.co.uk/5713.guide
(accessed June 7, 2020).
14. Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Guidelines for Preventing
Workplace Violence for Healthcare and Social Service Workers (OSHA, 3148-
04R). Washington, DC: OSHA (2015) Available online at: https://www.osha.
gov/Publications/osha3148.pdf (accessed June 7, 2020).
15. Workplace violence in the health sector. World Health Organization Survey
Questionnaire ONU. Rapporto Italia. Rome (2019). Available online at:
https://portale.fnomceo.it/sanita-ricerca- oms-nursing- up-un- infermiere-
su-10- ha-subito- violenza-fisica- sul-lavoro-e-il-4-e-stato- minacciato-con-
una-pistola- nellultimo-anno/ (accessed June 7, 2020).
16. FNOMCeO. Un medico su due ha subito aggressioni.I dati preliminari dello
studio FNOMCEO. Rome (2019). Available from: https://portale.fnomceo.it/
un-medico-su-due- ha-subito- aggressioni-i- dati-preliminari-dello-studio-
fnomceo/ (accessed June 7, 2020).
17. Babiarczyk B, Turbiarz A, Tomagová M, Zeleníková R, Önler E,
Sancho Cantus D. Violence against nurses working in the health
sector in five European countries-pilot study. Int J Nurs Pract. (2019)
25:e12744. doi: 10.1111/ijn.12744
18. More than 30 SA Hospitals Report Serious Security Incidents in Past 5 Months.
(2019). Available online at: https://www.medicalbrief.co.za/archives/30-sa-
hospitals-report- serious-security- incidents-pas-5-months/ (accessed June 7,
2020).
19. Brady L, De Vries S, Gallow R, George A, Gilson L, Louw M, et al.
Paramedics, poetry, and film: health policy and systems research at the
intersection of theory, art, and practice. Hum Resour Health. (2019)
17:64. doi: 10.1186/s12960-019-0373-5
20. Sahebi A, Jahangiri K, Sohrabizadeh S, Golitaleb M. Prevalence of
workplace violence types against personnel of emergency medical services
in Iran: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Iran J Psychiatry. (2019)
14:325–34.
21. World Health Organization. Violence against Healthcare Workers. Available
from: https://www.who.int/violence,injury,prevention/violence/workplace/
en/ (accessed June 7, 2020).
22. Magnavita N, Heponiemi T, Chirico F. Workplace violence is associated with
impaired work functioning in nurses: an Italian cross-sectional study. J Nurs
Scholarsh. (2020) 52:281–91. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12549
23. D’Ettorre G, Pellicani V, Vullo A. Workplace violence against healthcare
workers in Emergency Departments. A case-control study. Acta Biomed.
(2019) 90:621–4. doi: 10.23750/abm.v90i4.7327
24. Toraldo DM, Vergari U, Toraldo M. Medical malpractice, defensive
medicine and role of the “media” in Italy. Multidiscip Respir Med. (2015)
10:12. doi: 10.1186/s40248-015-0006-3
25. Berlanda S, Pedrazza M, Fraizzoli M, de Cordova F. Addressing risks
of violence against healthcare staff in Emergency Departments: the
Frontiers in Public Health | www.frontiersin.org 3September 2020 | Volume 8 | Article 570459
Vento et al. Worldwide Violence Against Healthcare Workers
effects of job satisfaction and attachment style. Biomed Res Int. (2019)
5430870. doi: 10.1155/2019/5430870
26. Nowrouzi-Kia B, Chai E, Usuba K, Nowrouzi-Kia B, Casole J. Prevalence
of type II and type III workplace violence against physicians: a systematic
review and meta-analysis. Int J Occup Environ Med. (2019) 10:99–
110. doi: 10.15171/ijoem.2019.1573
27. Alsaleem SA, Alsabaani A, Alamri RS, Hadi RA, Alkhayri MH, Badawi
KK, et al. Violence towards healthcare workers: a study conducted in
Abha City, Saudi Arabia. J Family Community Med. (2018) 25:188–
93. doi: 10.4103/jfcm.JFCM_170_17
28. Shafran-Tikva S, Chinitz D, Feder-Bubis P. Violence against physicians and
nurses in a hospital: how does it happen? A mixed-methods study. Isr J Health
Policy Res. (2017) 6:59. doi: 10.1186/s13584-017-0183-y
29. Raveel A, Schoenmakers B. Interventions to prevent aggression
against doctors: a systematic review. BMJ Open. (2019)
9:e028465. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028465
30. Arnetz JE, Hamblin L, Russell J, Upfal MJ, Luborsky M, Janisse J,
et al. Preventing patient-to-worker violence in hospitals: outcome of a
randomized controlled intervention. J Occup Environ Med. (2017) 59: 18–
27. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000000909
31. Nelson R. Tackling violence against health-care workers. Lancet. (2014)
383:1373–4. doi: 10. 1016/s0140-6736(14)60658-9
32. Madhivanan A, Venugopal V, Dongre AR. Physical violence against
doctors: a content analysis from online Indian newspapers. Indian
J Community Med. (2020) 45:108–9. doi: 10.4103/ijcm.IJCM_
215_19
33. Kvas A, Seljak J. Unreported workplace violence in nursing. Int Nurs Rev.
(2014) 61:344–51. doi: 10.1111/inr.12106
34. Arnetz JE, Hamblin L, Ager J, Luborsky M, Upfal MJ, Russell J, et al.
Underreporting of workplace violence: comparison of self-report and actual
documentation of hospital incidents. Workplace Health Saf. (2015) 63:200–
10. doi: 10.1177/2165079915574684
Conflict of Interest: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the
absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a
potential conflict of interest.
Copyright © 2020 Vento, Cainelli and Vallone. This is an open-access article
distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY).
The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the
original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original
publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice.
No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these
terms.
Frontiers in Public Health | www.frontiersin.org 4September 2020 | Volume 8 | Article 570459
... Por otro lado, resulta alarmante que la mayoría de los médicos no denunciaron los incidentes de violencia. Es posible que exista una naturalización de estos actos, lo cual no exime a las víctimas de sus consecuencias adversas [28][29][30][31] . La falta de denuncia puede estar relacionada con una serie de factores, como el miedo a represalias, la percepción de que no se tomarán medidas adecuadas o la falta de conciencia sobre los canales adecuados para informar estos eventos. ...
... A ideia de que a violência é inerente ao trabalho de médicos e enfermeiros não é verdadeira e precisa ser combatida como forma de garantir a segurança dos profissionais no ambiente de trabalho. A falha em fazê-lo piorará os cuidados que devem prestar e afetará os sistemas de saúde em todo o mundo (26) . ...
Article
Full-text available
Objective: To analyze the daily work of an Emergency Care Unit (ECU), with emphasis on the violence experienced by the multiprofessional healthcare team. Method: Case study with a qualitative approach, conducted in na ECU in Minas Gerais, Brazil. The collection took place between August 2020 and January 2021, through observations, interviews and document review. Data were organized in MAXQDA 2020® and subjected to Content Analysis, based on Michel de Certeau’s theoretical framework of everyday life.Results: A total of 31 healthcare professionals participated. Violence against professionals was associated with the waiting time, the lack of beds for transfer and the restrictionson the entry of companions. The main aggressions were verbal, followed by physical aggression. Final considerations: The daily life of the ECU was permeated by labor violence. Although it was governed by strategies aimed at organizing the assistance provided, professionals adopted tactics to cope with the adversity. Descriptors: Workplace violence. Emergency medical services. Occupational health.
... A ideia de que a violência é inerente ao trabalho de médicos e enfermeiros não é verdadeira e precisa ser combatida como forma de garantir a segurança dos profissionais no ambiente de trabalho. A falha em fazê-lo piorará os cuidados que devem prestar e afetará os sistemas de saúde em todo o mundo (26) . ...
Article
Full-text available
Objective To analyze the daily work of an Emergency Care Unit (ECU), with emphasis on the violence experienced by the multiprofessional healthcare team. Method Case study with a qualitative approach, conducted in na ECU in Minas Gerais, Brazil. The collection took place between August 2020 and January 2021, through observations, interviews and document review. Data were organized in MAXQDA 2020® and subjected to Content Analysis, based on Michel de Certeau’s theoretical framework of everyday life. Results A total of 31 healthcare professionals participated. Violence against professionals was associated with the waiting time, the lack of beds for transfer and the restrictionson the entry of companions. The main aggressions were verbal, followed by physical aggression. Final considerations The daily life of the ECU was permeated by labor violence. Although it was governed by strategies aimed at organizing the assistance provided, professionals adopted tactics to cope with the adversity. Descriptors: Workplace violence; Emergency medical services; Occupational health
... The idea that violence is inherent to the work of physicians and nurses is not accurate and needs to be addressed as a way of ensuring the safety of professionals in the workplace. Failure to do so will worsen the care they must provide and will affect healthcare systems worldwide (26) . ...
Article
Full-text available
Objective To analyze the daily work of an Emergency Care Unit (ECU), with emphasis on the violence experienced by the multiprofessional healthcare team. Method Case study with a qualitative approach, conducted in na ECU in Minas Gerais, Brazil. The collection took place between August 2020 and January 2021, through observations, interviews and document review. Data were organized in MAXQDA 2020® and subjected to Content Analysis, based on Michel de Certeau’s theoretical framework of everyday life. Results A total of 31 healthcare professionals participated. Violence against professionals was associated with the waiting time, the lack of beds for transfer and the restrictionson the entry of companions. The main aggressions were verbal, followed by physical aggression. Final considerations The daily life of the ECU was permeated by labor violence. Although it was governed by strategies aimed at organizing the assistance provided, professionals adopted tactics to cope with the adversity. Descriptors: Workplace violence; Emergency medical services; Occupational health
... A report issued by the Pakistan Medical Association claimed that 128 doctors in Pakistan had lost their lives to violence from 1995-2015 [8]. A review of 253 studies by Vento et al. reported 61.9% of the participants to have suffered from some form of violence, with most incidents narrated from Asian and North American countries [9]. In Iran, 73% and 36% of emergency medical personnel reported being verbally and physically abused, respectively [10]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background: Workplace violence (WPV) is a global problem that affects healthcare workers’ physical and mental health and impairs work performance. Pakistan’s healthcare system is not immune to WPV, which the World Health Organization recognizes as an occupational hazard. Objectives: The primary objective of this systematic review is to determine the prevalence of physical, verbal, or other forms of WPV in healthcare workers in Pakistan. Secondary objectives include identifying the associated risk factors, and perpetrators of WPV. Methods: A systematic review of six electronic databases was conducted through August 2022. Studies were included if they met the following criteria: 1) healthcare workers (HCWs), including physicians, nurses, and paramedic staff working in the private or public sector of Pakistan; 2) exposure to physical, verbal, or any type of violence. Data were extracted and analyzed for the prevalence of WPV, types of violence, associated risk factors, and perpetrators of violence. Results: Twenty-four studies including 16,070 HCWs, were included in this review. Verbal violence was the most common form of violence levied, with its highest prevalence (100%) reported in Islamabad and lowest verbal violence prevalence (25%) in Karachi. Verbal abuse was preponderant against female HCWs, while physical abuse was directed more toward males. The most common perpetrators were patient attendants, followed by the patients. Conclusion: Our review determines a 25-100% prevalence of WPV against HCWs in Pakistani medical setup. This occupational hazard needs the attention of relevant authorities in the country to put protective enforcement policies in place. Large-scale surveys should be conducted to better gauge the current plight of HCWs in the nation. Keywords: Healthcare; workplace violence; mental health; physical health
... Vento et al in their study, 'violence against healthcare workers: a worldwide phenomenon with serious consequences' stated that all workers have a right to be safe on their job, and healthcare workers are no exception; the idea that violence is inherent to doctors and nurses' work, especially in certain departments, needs to be fought; urgent measures must be implemented to ensure the safety of all HCWs in their environment, and the needed resources must be allocated. 22 They also specified that the failure to do so will worsen the care that they are employed to deliver and will ultimately negatively affect the whole healthcare system worldwide. Our study adds to the results of Vento et al by bringing out the negative effect of the increasing WPV against healthcare workers which are the career change plans among interns and their lack of interest towards working in government hospital setups. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background: Compared to any other profession, workplace violence in our country is reported more among health care workers. This study aims at bringing out the impact of the violence against healthcare workers in the minds of the medical interns of medical colleges in Kanniyakumari, Tamil Nadu. Methods: A cross-sectional study was carried out, using a pre-determined, pre-tested, semi-structured questionnaire among 100 medical interns, randomly selected from 2 medical colleges in Kanniyakumari district of Tamil Nadu. Results: 37% interns had experienced workplace violence. Departments such as casualty, ICU, OBG, pediatrics and orthopedics are highly prone for incidence of violence against healthcare professionals. The current rise in the violence against healthcare professionals has affected the future plans of majority (80%) of interns. 24% of them want to work overseas, 12% of them intend to join private/corporate hospitals, 9% of them want non-clinical courses for post-graduation studies, 7% of them intend to take up administrative sector professions whereas 5% of them plan to quit medical field and change their career due to the rise in violence against healthcare workers. Conclusions: It has been established that many interns are not willing to work in government hospitals and many are planning to move abroad because of fear of violence. This will adversely affect the healthcare standards in our country especially in rural areas. Therefore, adequate steps must to taken to prevent the occurrence of violence against healthcare workers in our country.
Article
Full-text available
Objective: To find the frequency of various types of violence and its contributing factors among healthcare workers in tertiary healthcare hospitals of Peshawar. Study Design: Cross-sectional study. Methodology: A sample size of 400 healthcare professionals from three hospitals was determined using open epi simple size calculator. The selection of participants was conducted using a non-probability convenient sampling approach. Data was collected using a pretested structured questionnaire after the participants' informed permission was acquired. Healthcare professionals include individuals such as physicians and registered nurses. Results: Most healthcare employees, 97.5%, said they did not experience physical abuse. A total of 1.5% of participants reported experiencing being assaulted once, whereas 1.0% reported experiencing physical assault two to three times. The mean and standard deviation for the latter group were calculated to be 1.04±0.232. A total of 37.2% of respondents said they did not experience any verbal abuse during the previous year. A total of 14.8% of respondents reported experiencing verbal harassment at least once, while 31.8% indicated facing verbal abuse two to three times. Additionally, 16.2% reported encountering verbal abuse more than four times during the last year. These findings yielded a mean of 2.27 occurrences of verbal abuse, with a standard deviation of 1.127. Conclusion: Verbal abuse is a pervasive concern in healthcare, often coupled with physical and emotional aggression.
Article
Full-text available
Introduction Healthcare workers have a significant chance of experiencing violence, with physical violence impacting anywhere from 8 to 38% of healthcare professionals throughout their careers. Besides physical abuse, many healthcare workers are subject to verbal aggression or threats, with patients and visitors being the most frequent sources of such incidents. Methods This research examines the work atmosphere of healthcare professionals at Kasr Al-Aini University Hospital in Cairo, Egypt, during the pandemic. The study aims to evaluate the frequency of violence toward healthcare workers and health professionals training through a cross-sectional survey conducted among them. The research was conducted on Egyptian healthcare workers over 6 months, from November 2020 until the end of January 2021, using convenience sampling in a cross-sectional study. Over half of the respondents reported experiencing violence. Results Among those who experienced violence, 93% reported verbal aggression, 43% reported physical and verbal abuse, and 59% claimed that violence increased during the pandemic. Additionally, 97% of those who experienced violence reported it occurring within the 4 months following the survey. About 42.5% of the respondents were female, and nearly 65% were over 30. 82% of the respondents did not receive training on handling violence while performing their job. Conclusion This study highlights the high prevalence of verbal assaults in healthcare settings, primarily by patients’ families or acquaintances. Despite reporting such incidents, most respondents did not see any significant government action. Furthermore, the COVID-19 pandemic did not significantly change the frequency of violent incidents, indicating that the root causes of violence are systemic and extend beyond the pandemic. These findings underscore the need for systemic changes in healthcare organizations to address and prevent violence against healthcare workers.
Article
Introduction Medicine has long been a notoriously popular and competitive university course worldwide, with many aspiring medical applicants vying for a coveted spot at a local or overseas medical school every year. To boost their chances of getting into a medical program, prospective students work hard for good academic grades, participate in extracurricular activities, volunteer work, research projects, medical internships, take up leadership roles, and some even enroll into expensive “premed consulting programmes” that help applicants construct the “perfect” personal statement, manage their portfolio, and prepare for admission interviews. Yet, several years down the road, after graduating from medical school, many junior doctors quickly experience burnout at work and become highly stressed, depressed, and disillusioned with their medical careers [1], leading to a mass physician exodus from public hospitals [2]. This intriguing phenomenon may be attributed to a disconnect between how aspiring medical applicants perceive medicine and what medical trainees and physicians experience in reality. In this article, I seek to provide candid insights into both the challenges of medical training and practice as well as the unique benefits and rewarding experience of a medical career. I will also share practical advice for aspiring medical students to help them navigate the challenges in their medical journey.
Article
One of the important communication channels today, news can inform and manipulate individuals. In order to reveal the public reflections of violence in health care, which is one of the important problems encountered in the health system in Turkey, the news on the subject were examined in detail within this study. The scope of the research consists of 946 news reports from the top five newspapers with the highest circulation (Hürriyet, Sabah, Sözcü, Milliyet and Posta). Web mining was used to obtain the data. In the analysis of the data, word clouds, time graphs and trigram were created using text mining method. In addition, using manual content analysis, the news reports were classified under some basic headings. It was determined that the most frequently used common words in the news headlines, abstracts and contents were "health", "violence", "doctor" and "hospital". When examined in terms of content, it was emphasized in the news that violence in health care occurred mostly in hospitals and emergency departments, violence was committed mostly by patient relatives and patients, the group most exposed to violence was physicians, and violence usually resulted in injury. It is thought that these findings will be beneficial in terms of contributing to the accurate determination of the issues to be prioritized in policy-making processes.
Article
Full-text available
Background: Occupational violence is considered unlawful in professional environments worldwide. In the healthcare industry, including dentistry, the safety of workers is essential, and it is of the utmost importance to ensure patient and employee safety and provide quality care. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of violence and associated workplace policies among oral healthcare professionals. Additionally, it aimed to identify the factors associated with violence and their impact on oral healthcare workers. Methods: A systematic review and analysis of the literature was conducted using PubMed, ScienceDirect, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and ProQuest. Original articles written in English and published between January 1992 and August 2019 were included in the analysis. Results: A total of 980 articles were found, and eight were selected for analysis. The violence experienced by healthcare workers included both physical and non-physical forms, such as shouting, bullying, and threatening; it also included sexual harassment. The impact of violence on workers manifested as impaired quality of work, psychological problems, and, although rare, quitting the job. With regard to dental healthcare, awareness of occupational violence policies among dental professionals has not been previously reported in the literature. Conclusions: The increasing incidence of occupational violence against oral healthcare workers indicates the need for the implementation of better protective measures to create a safe working environment for dental professionals. There is a current need for increasing awareness of workplace violence policies and for the detection and reporting of aggression and violence at dental facilities.
Article
Full-text available
Objective: Workplace violence is one type of occupational hazards that is increasingly growing worldwide. In the health system, one of the important groups subject to workplace violence is emergency medical services (EMS) personnel, who provide emergency services for patients and casualties as the first responders. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of workplace violence and its different types among Iranian EMS personnel. Method : This study was conducted based on PRISMA guideline for systematic review and meta-analysis. The data were extracted from Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar, SID and MagIran databases using Persian and English keywords. The search was conducted up to December 2018 without any limitation in publication year. The qualities of selected papers were assessed by STROBE checklist. I² index was used to evaluate heterogeneity, and random effects model was used in meta-analysis. Data were analyzed using Stata14. Results: A total of 9 studies entered the meta-analysis. The total sample size was 1257 Iranian EMS personnel, with an average age of 32.21 ± 2.01 years. The prevalence of physical, verbal, and cultural workplace violence among EMS personnel was 36.39% (CI 95%:27.29–45.50, P<0.001, I² = 90.8%), 73.13% (95% CI=68.64-77.62, P=0.013, I² = 62.7%), and 16.51% (95% CI =3.49- 29.53, p<0.001. I² = 94.7%), respectively. Conclusion: Considering the high prevalence of workplace violence among EMS personnel in Iran, more studies should be conducted to determine the underlying causes of EMS staff workplace violence in Iran. Training violence prevention methods as well as assigning national protective rules are highly suggested. Insufficient studies on Workplace violence among EMS personnel in Iran and high heterogeneity were the limitations of this study.
Article
Full-text available
Fundamentos: El incremento de la violencia en el ámbito sanitario en los últimos años ha ocasionado importantes consecuencias sobre la salud de los trabajadores agredidos. Se plantea esta revisión sistemática cuyo objetivo fue actualizar y revisar la literatura científica disponible sobre las agresiones a trabajadores del sector sanitario en España. Métodos: Se llevó a cabo una revisión sistemática de la literatura sobre agresiones al personal del sector sanitario. Se realizaron búsquedas en las siguientes bases de datos: Scielo, Cuidatge, Medline, Cuiden, Scopus, Dialnet, Ibecs, Sciencedirect, Medes, Enfispo, Ibecs, Lilacs, Índices CSIC y Embase. Se incluyeron todos los artículos originales hasta abril de 2019, publicados en inglés o español. Resultados: Se incluyeron 23 estudios. La calidad metodológica de los estudios incluidos fue buena. Las agresiones que se producen tienden a seguir un mismo patrón. Fueron mayormente agresiones verbales, acompañadas en numerosas ocasiones de amenazas. Los pacientes fueron los principales agresores, ejerciendo violencia fundamentalmente hacia médicos y profesionales de enfermería. Las principales causas se debieron a los tiempos de espera y a las demoras, pero pocas veces los hechos fueron denunciados o registrados. Conclusiones: Se observa un incremento en la magnitud del fenómeno en los últimos años. En la mayoría de los casos los agresores son hombres, pero en cambio los profesionales agredidos son mayormente mujeres. La variabilidad en los registros de notificaciones de agresiones y en los cuestionarios utilizados en los diferentes estudios, así como la subjetividad e interpretación de estos hechos, dificulta la comparación entre ellos.
Article
Full-text available
Background: The increase in violence in the health sector in recent years has had important consequences on the health of workers who have been attacked. This systematic review is proposed, whose objective was to update and systematically review the available scientific literature on the aggressions against workers in the health sector in Spain. Methods: A systematic review of the literature on aggressions to the health care personnel was carried out. The following database were searched: Scielo, Cuidatge, Medline, Cuiden, Scopus, Dialnet, Ibecs, Sciencedirect, Medes, Enfispo, Ibecs, Lilacs, CSIC and Embase databases. All original articles were included until April 2019, published in English or Spanish. Results: Twenty-three studies were included. The methodological quality of the included studies was good. The aggression that occur tend to follow the same pattern; they are mostly verbal and psychological aggressions, often accompanied by threats. Patients are the main aggressors, to normally doctors and nurses. The main causes are waiting times and delays, rarely the facts are reported or recorded. Conclusions: There is an increase in the magnitude of the phenomenon in recent years, in most cases the aggressors are men, whereas the aggressed professionals are mostly women. The variability in the records of aggression notifications and in the questionnaires used in the different studies, as well as the subjectivity and interpretation of these facts, make comparison between them difficult.
Article
Full-text available
Objectives To determine the prevalence of physical violence and threats against health workers and the aftermath in tertiary, secondary and primary care facilities in China. Design A cross-sectional questionnaire study. Setting 5 tertiary hospitals, 8 secondary hospitals and 32 primary care facilities located in both urban and rural areas of Zhejiang Province, China, were chosen as the study sites. Participants A total of 4862 health workers who have contact with patients completed a survey from July 2016 to July 2017. Outcome measures The prevalence of physical violence, threats and Yi Nao, specific forms of physical violence and their aftermath were measured by a self-designed and verified questionnaire. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to examine the association between perceived organisational encouragement of reporting workplace violence (WPV) and physical violence, threats and Yi Nao after controlling for age, sex, level of facility, professional ranking and type of health worker. Results Among all respondents, 224 (4.6%) were physically attacked and 848 (17.4%) experienced threats in the past year. Respondents in secondary hospitals were more likely to experience physical violence (AOR=3.29, 95% CI 2.21 to 4.89), threats (AOR=1.61, 95% CI 1.32 to 1.98) and Yi Nao (AOR=2.47, 95% CI 2.10 to 2.91), compared with primary care providers. Lack of organisational policies to report WPV was associated with higher likelihood of physical violence (AOR=3.64, 95% CI 2.57 to 5.18) and threats (AOR=2.21, 95% CI 1.76 to 2.78). Among physical violence cases, only 29.1% reported the attack to police mainly because most felt it useless to do so (58.8%). Only 25.7% were investigated and 72.4% of attackers received no punishment. Of all those attacked or threatened, 59.4% wanted to quit current post and 76.0% were fearful of dealing with urgent or severe cases. Conclusions Proper management of the aftermath of violence against health workers is inadequate. Formal guidelines for reporting and managing WPV are urgently needed.
Article
Full-text available
Objective To find out if there is evidence on interventions to prevent aggression against doctors. Design This systematic review searched the literature and reported in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Data sources Pubmed, Embase, Turning Research into Practice (TRIP), Cochrane and Psycharticle, GoogleScholar and www.guideline.gov were consulted. Eligibility criteria Abstracts published in English between January 2000 and January 2018 were screened. Eligible studies focused on prevention and risk factors of type II workplace violence in general healthcare, psychiatric departments, emergency departments, emergency primary care, general practice. Data extraction and synthesis The selected intervention studies were grouped into quantitative and qualitative studies. Systematic reviews were reported separately. For each study, the design, type of intervention and key findings were analysed. Quality rating was based on Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) and GRADE-Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative Research (CERQUAL). Results 44 studies are included. One randomised controlled trial (RCT) provided moderate evidence that a violence prevention programme was effective in decreasing risks of violence. Major risk factors are long waiting times, discrepancy between patients’ expectations and services, substance abuse by the patient and psychiatric conditions. Appropriate workplace design and policies aim to reduce risk factors but there is no hard evidence on the effectiveness. One RCT provided evidence that a patient risk assessment combined with tailored actions decreased severe aggression events in psychiatric wards. Applying de-escalation techniques during an aggressive event is highly recommended. Postincident reporting followed by root cause analysis of the incident provides the basic input for review and optimisation of violence prevention programmes. Conclusions This review documented interventions to prevent and de-escalate aggression against doctors. Aggression against physicians is a serious occupational hazard. There is moderate evidence that an integrated violence prevention programme decreases the risks of patient-to-worker violence. The review failed to gather sufficient numerical data to perform a meta-analysis. A large-scale cohort study would add to a better understanding of the effectiveness of interventions.
Article
Objective: Workplace violence against nurses is a widespread phenomenon that has been associated with many unfavorable individual and organizational outcomes. The aim of this study was to analyze the relationship between violence and work functioning in a sample of Italian nurses. Design: Cross-sectional, with retrospective analysis of exposure. Methods: All nurses from a local hospital were invited to complete a questionnaire assessing violent experiences that occurred in the previous 12 months. The questionnaire also measured job strain (with the Demand-Control-Support questionnaire), organizational justice (with Colquitt's Questionnaire), and work impairment (with the Nurses Work Functioning Questionnaire). The associations were examined with logistic regression analyses. Findings: Of the 302 nurses who were invited, 275 (91.1%) agreed to participate. The total work impairment score was significantly higher among the nurses exposed to violence compared with the nonexposed nurses (42.2 ± 27.8 vs. 31.9 ± 31.6, respectively; p < .001). Exposed nurses also reported significantly higher levels of job strain (0.96 ± 0.25 vs. 0.8 ± 0.21; p = .003) and lower levels of perceived organizational justice (56.6 ± 12.6 vs. 62.5 ± 14.8; p = .001) than nonexposed nurses. Nurses who had experienced violence had a significantly higher risk for impairment of work functioning than their colleagues (crude odds ratio [OR] = 2.33; 95% confidence interval [CI 95%] = 1.42-3.83). The association between violence and impairment remained significant after adjusting for demographic variables, occupational stress, and perceived organizational justice (OR = 1.83; 95% CI 95% = 1.06-3.17). Conclusions: Workplace violence is associated with impaired work function in nurses. Job strain and perceived organizational injustice are associated with impairment. Clinical relevance: Violence prevention programs in healthcare activities should include training for violent behavior identification and de-escalation techniques, structural and administrative measures for violence control (such as alarms, surveillance, staff increase), and measures to reduce occupational stress, which can include wellness courses, spirituality, organizational improvements, and staffing methodologies.
Article
We aim to quantitatively synthesise available epidemiological evidence on the prevalence rates of workplace violence (WPV) by patients and visitors against healthcare workers. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase and Web of Science from their inception to October 2018, as well as the reference lists of all included studies. Two authors independently assessed studies for inclusion. Data were double-extracted and discrepancies were resolved by discussion. The overall percentage of healthcare worker encounters resulting in the experience of WPV was estimated using random-effects meta-analysis. The heterogeneity was assessed using the I 2 statistic. Differences by study-level characteristics were estimated using subgroup analysis and meta-regression. We included 253 eligible studies (with a total of 331 544 participants). Of these participants, 61.9% (95% CI 56.1% to 67.6%) reported exposure to any form of WPV, 42.5% (95% CI 38.9% to 46.0%) reported exposure to non-physical violence, and 24.4% (95% CI 22.4% to 26.4%) reported experiencing physical violence in the past year. Verbal abuse (57.6%; 95% CI 51.8% to 63.4%) was the most common form of non-physical violence, followed by threats (33.2%; 95% CI 27.5% to 38.9%) and sexual harassment (12.4%; 95% CI 10.6% to 14.2%). The proportion of WPV exposure differed greatly across countries, study location, practice settings, work schedules and occupation. In this systematic review, the prevalence of WPV against healthcare workers is high, especially in Asian and North American countries, psychiatric and emergency department settings, and among nurses and physicians. There is a need for governments, policymakers and health institutions to take actions to address WPV towards healthcare professionals globally.