Content uploaded by Adam Swartzendruber
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Adam Swartzendruber on Oct 31, 2020
Content may be subject to copyright.
U.S. Sports Academy October 30, 2020
The R.I.C.E Protocol is a MYTH: A Review and
Recommendations
thesportjournal.org/article/the-r-i-c-e-protocol-is-a-myth-a-review-and-recommendations/
Authors: Domenic Scialoia & Adam J. Swartzendruber
Corresponding Author:
Domenic Scialoia
Saint Joseph’s College of Maine
278 Whites Bridge Road
Standish, ME 04084
Email: domenic.scialoia@sjcme.edu
Phone: 617-922-0309
Domenic Scialoia is a recent graduate of Saint Joseph’s College of Maine, where he
obtained a Bachelor of Science in Exercise Science with concentrations in Pre- Physical
Therapy and Sport Performance.
Adam J. Swartzendruber is an Assistant Professor of Sport and Exercise Science at Saint
Joseph’s College of Maine.
ABSTRACT
The RICE (Rest, Ice, Compression, Elevation) protocol has been the preferred method of
treatment for acute musculoskeletal injuries since its origin in a 1978 publication entitled
“Sports Medicine Book” by Dr. Gabe Mirkin. These guidelines have been used by coaches
and healthcare providers for over four decades with the intent of expediting the recovery
process and reducing inflammation. Although popular, the implementation of this
protocol to attenuate the recovery process is unsubstantiated. There is, however, an
abundance of research that collectively supports the notion that ice and rest does not
enhance the recovery process, but instead delays recovery, and may result in further
damage to the tissue. Research in regard to compression and elevation is inconclusive,
diluted and largely anecdotal. Definitive guidelines for their application have yet to be
purported. As a result of the subsequent research that examined the validity of the
protocol, Dr. Mirkin recanted his original position on the protocol in 2015. The objective
of this article is to analyze the available evidence within the research literature to elucidate
why the RICE protocol is not a credible method for enhancing the recovery process of acute
musculoskeletal injuries. In addition, evidence- based alternatives to the protocol will be
1/19
examined. These findings are important to consider and should be utilized by any
healthcare professional; specifically, those who specialize in the facilitation of optimal
recovery, as well as those who teach in health-related disciplines in higher education.
Key words: R.I.C.E, Active Recovery, Icing, Inflammation, Injury Rehabilitation
INTRODUCTION
Disclaimer: The following information is intended for educational purposes only and
not as medical advice.
On May 23, 1962, twelve- year- old Everett (Eddie) Knowles jumped on to a freight train in
Somerville, MA resulting in his arm being completely severed from his body. The young
boy was taken to Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) where Dr. Ronald A. Malt, a
young chief resident, attempted to save Eddie’s detached limb. Despite the fact that there
had never been a successful reattachment of a major limb recorded in medical literature,
Dr. Malt and a team of twelve doctors performed the first successful limb reattachment in
history.
The operation’s success quickly became a global phenomenon. Newscasters swarmed the
team of doctors to obtain essential facts about the miracle limb reattachment touted as one
of the most monumental operations in medical history. However, the essential facts about
the surgery were rather complicated and would not be understood by the general public.
Instead, reporters focused on the aspects of the story that would be intriguing to the reader.
As a result, the application of ice to preserve the severed tissue became the main focus of
the story. (21, 33, 36)
The use of ice to treat injuries was never part of medical protocol prior to the events of May
23, 1962 and the notion to utilize ice for tissue preservation was quickly published by
newspapers around the globe. Subsequently, as the story was continuously retold by
individuals not directly involved in the surgery, facts began to change. Eventually, the
general public was quickly accepting the notion that any injury should be treated with the
application of ice, regardless of its severity or how it occurred (36).
In 1978, Dr. Gabe Mirkin released “ Sportsmedicine Book” and coined the acronym “RICE”
(Rest, Ice, Compression, and Elevation) to represent the four activities for treating acute
athletic injuries. The RICE protocol has been ingrained in academic curriculum as well as
in public perception for over four decades. In 2013, however, RICE was challenged by
Gary Reinl in his book “Iced! The Illusionary Treatment Option.” Reinl cited numerous
studies and anatomical resources in support of the notion that resting an injury, while
wrapping it tightly (compression) with ice, is ineffective in accelerating the recovery
process and could also result in further damage to the affected tissues.
Following the release of Reinl’s book, Mirkin publicly recanted his original position on the
2/19
RICE protocol in a 2015 publication on his personal website (31). Mirkin even wrote the
foreword to Reinl’s second edition of “Iced! The Illusionary Treatment Option”, and
offered his revised opinion on the protocol he created;
Subsequent research shows that rest and ice can actually delay recovery. Mild movement
helps tissue to heal faster, and the application of cold suppresses the immune responses that
start and hasten recovery. Icing does help suppress pain, but athletes are usually far more
interested in returning as quickly as possible to the playing field. So, today, RICE is not the
preferred treatment for an acute athletic injury (36).
Based upon the available evidence, the only plausible conclusion is that the use of the RICE
technique to accelerate the recovery process is unequivocally a myth. Its validity was
unequivocally compromised in 2015 when Dr. Mirkin publicly recanted his original
position from 1978.
There is an abundance of scientific evidence purporting proven methods to accelerate the
healing of muscle, ligament, and tendon injuries that do not include extended periods of
rest used in conjunction with ice, compression, and elevation. To debunk the RICE myth,
it is prudent to explore the physiological responses to injury and the effect ice,
compression, elevation and inactivity have on those processes. The ultimate conclusion is
that there are more optimal techniques to accelerate the recovery process that do not
include a period of inactivity in which compression and topical cooling (ice) is
simultaneously applied to the affected area.
Physiological Response to Tissue Trauma
When the homeostatic structure of any of the body’s tissues are compromised due to
trauma, the same sequence of physiological events will occur regardless of whether the
compromised tissue is a muscle, tendon, or ligament (43). Additionally, each phase of the
repair process must successfully occur to allow for the initiation of the next phase (43).
When disruptions form in tissues, the body responds with three sequenced phases of
recovery: 1) inflammation, 2) repair, and 3) remodeling (2). This sequence means that the
process of inflammation must successfully occur in order for the body to shift its focus to
the repair phase which must also be completed before proceeding to the remodeling phase.
The magnitude of the inflammatory response is dependent upon the severity of the
trauma, as well as the degree of vascularization of the tissue (29).
Inflammation is commonly misunderstood and generally believed to be synonymous with
swelling. However, the two are entirely different. Inflammation is the first phase of a
three-phase sequence of tissue repair, while swelling is “the accumulation of waste at the
end of the inflammatory process that is not yet evacuated” (36). Inflammation is not an
undesired outcome that needs to be reduced or delayed, but rather an instantaneous
3/19
defense mechanism with the primary objective of controlling the extent of cell injury and
preparing the tissue for the process of repair (24). As noted by Leadbetter (23),
“inflammation can occur without healing, but healing cannot occur without inflammation.”
The rapid process of inflammation is caused by necrosis, or accidental cell death (34), and
begins with a brief period of vasoconstriction and hemostasis which restricts blood flow
and allows for a blood clot to form (7). The formation of the blood clot prevents
substantial blood loss. Immediately after this transitory period of vasoconstriction,
damaged tissue mast cells degranulate, releasing inflammatory chemicals such as
histamine, which cause local vasodilation and an increased permeability of the lining of the
blood vessels (34). Local vasodilation is the process in which the blood vessels in the
immediate area begin to widen in an effort to enhance blood flow. This increase in
vascular permeability and vasodilation allow neutrophils, which are white blood cells that
have been attracted to the area of trauma by the inflammatory chemicals, to enter the
interstitial space where they can optimally interact with damaged tissues (34).
Macrophages, which are cells that are essential for tissue development and repair,
simultaneously enter the interstitial space to clear debris and produce growth factors (51).
Specifically, macrophages are responsible for the release of insulin-like growth factor (IGF-
1), which is an essential hormone required for muscle regeneration (31).
As the waste products produced by macrophages and neutrophils begin to accumulate
around the damaged site in the form of fluid, the body relies on the lymphatic system to
drain the area (36). The lymphatic system is a passive, one-way mode of transportation for
excess fluid that relies on the voluntary contraction of the body’s tissues as a method of
propulsion. “When fluid enters the terminal lymphatic capillaries, any motion in the
tissues that intermittently compresses the lymphatic capillaries propels the lymph forward
through the lymphatic system” (12). Therefore, to ensure the lymphatic’s system
functionality, the muscles must be actively contracted to facilitate the efficient flow of
lymph throughout the body. The inadequate functioning of the lymphatic system is the
primary contributor to the accumulation of waste products, excess swelling, and the
inability to allow for the optimal recovery of damaged tissues (36). As noted by Reinl (37),
“there’s not too much inflammation, there’s too little evacuation.”
When the body is able to successfully clear the damaged site of excess fluid via the
lymphatic system, the process of repair is enabled (phase two of the recovery process). An
essential aspect of this phase includes angiogenesis, the division of endothelial cells that
add blood vessels to portions of tissues that did not previously have them (1). This
addition of blood vessels is an essential process because the remodeling of damaged tissues
(phase three of the recovery process) is dependent upon the body’s ability to reestablish a
vascular network for optimal oxygen and nutrient exchange.
Another key aspect of the repair phase is the construction of a temporary extracellular
matrix, which is accomplished by fibroblasts. Fibroblast are collagen producing cells,
4/19
which create weak granulation tissue composed of collagen and fibronectin that will
provide the framework for the development of new tissue (10). Immediately after the body
reestablishes a vascular network and produces the framework for tissue reconstruction, the
process of remodeling is initiated (phase three of the recovery process). The granulation
tissue that was laid down during the repair phase is gradually remodeled into stronger
tissue and the recovery process is completed.
Icing’s Effect on the Physiological Response to Tissue Trauma
The general premise of applying ice to damaged tissues is reducing inflammation.
However, it is important to note that anything that reduces inflammation also delays
healing (31) because the process of inflammation is an essential aspect of recovery. When
topical cooling (ice) is applied to damaged tissues, it acts as a vasoconstrictor (the
narrowing of local blood vessels) (20). This physiological response impedes the transport
of inflammatory chemicals and neutrophils to the site of trauma. Khoshnevis (20)
purported that icing can produce further damage to the body’s tissues due to the prolonged
period of vasoconstriction that “is not directly dependent on the continuing existence of a
cold state.” In other words, the blood vessels will remain constricted after icing regardless
of whether or not the ice is being actively applied. As a result of the reduced blood flow, the
tissue is subjected to a hypoxic (low oxygen) environment, which can result in tissue death
and permanent nerve damage (20).
Although ice seems like a beneficial option to reduce swelling according to decades of
assumptions about the R.I.C.E. technique, clinical research indicates that its utilization
does not reduce the accumulation of fluid and can actually result in a greater degree of
swelling. According to Meeusen and Lievens (27)
When ice is applied to a body part for a prolonged period, nearby lymphatic vessels begin to
dramatically increase their permeability. As lymphatic permeability is enhanced, large
amounts of fluid begin to pour from the lymphatics in the wrong direction, increasing the
amount of local swelling and pressure and potentially contributing to greater pain.
A study conducted in 2013 examining the effect of cryotherapy (“ice therapy”) on muscle
recovery and inflammation found that subjecting the tissues to 20 minutes of cooling was
“ineffective in attenuating the strength decrement and soreness seen after muscle
damaging exercise” (9). The authors concluded “these results do not support the use of
cryotherapy during recovery.”
Not only has topical cooling (ice) been proven to be an ineffective method for recovery of
tissues, it has also been proven to delay the healing process and produce additional
damage. Tseng et al. (49) concluded that topical cooling does not enhance, and seems to
delay, the return to normal concentrations of muscle damage markers and subjective
5/19
fatigue after eccentric exercise. Consequently, participants experienced an increased
perception of pain and fatigue, as well as no change in their elevated levels of muscle
damage markers, even after ice was applied to the site of trauma (49).
Icing also prevents the release of IGF-1 from macrophages during the process of
inflammation. Lu (25) examined this phenomenon in mice. One group of lab mice were
genetically altered and unable to carry out the normal inflammatory process. The second
group, which was not subjected to the genetic alterations, possessed the ability to carry out
the normal process of inflammation. Both groups of mice were injected in their right
quadriceps muscle with 100 microliters of barium chloride in order to produce an acute
skeletal muscle injury. The mice who were genetically unable to produce the inflammatory
response experienced a reduction in the amounts of IGF-1 present in their tissues and did
not successfully recover (25). On the other hand, the control group of mice had very large
amounts of IGF-1 present in their tissues after being subjected to trauma. These findings
suggest that the inflammatory process is essential for tissue regeneration since it produces
IGF-1. Further, the results of this study suggest that the use of ice, which has been proven
to delay the inflammatory process (9, 27, 49), will directly suppress the production of IGF-1
from macrophages and may result in suboptimal tissue regeneration. A more recent study
explored this phenomenon as well. Miyakawa et. al (32) applied ice to the skeletal muscles
of rats for 20 minutes shortly after an injury. The authors found that “accumulation of
macrophages was inhibited until 12 hours after the injury.” Considering the findings from
Lu (25), we can infer that IGF-1 production was also inhibited for 12 hours after injury as a
result of applying ice to the damaged tissues, ultimately delaying the recovery process.
There are several studies that suggest the cyclical application of ice is beneficial with the
pain management of soft tissue injuries (3, 8, 16, 19, 26). Kellett (19) suggests “cryotherapy
for 10 to 20 minutes, two to four times per day for the first two to three days is helpful in
promoting early return to activity.” MacAuley (26) and Bleakley (3) had similar findings.
MacAuley (26), which was a literature review exploring the evidence in support of ice
therapy, concluded “ice is effective but should be applied in repeated application of 10
minutes to be most effective, avoid side effects, and prevent possible further injury.”
Bleakely (3) explored the difference between the standard 20-minute icing protocol and an
intermittent protocol and found that “intermittent applications may enhance the
therapeutic effect of ice in pain relief after acute soft tissue injury.” Collins (8), which is the
most recent publication of this group, also purported that “cryotherapy seems to be
effective in decreasing pain.” However, “the efficacy of cryotherapy has been questioned.
The exact effect of cryotherapy on more frequently treated acute injuries has not been fully
elucidated” (8).
The authors of these studies have merely supported the notion that ice therapy may be
beneficial in pain management, but not one could definitively prove that ice decreased
swelling or attenuated the recovery process. In some cases, the authors suggested that
6/19
evidence in support of icing is insufficient and more studies are warranted (8, 16, 47).
There is no evidence in the available literature that definitively supports the notion that ice
belongs in a rehabilitation protocol for an acute musculoskeletal injury, unless pain
reduction is the only desired outcome.
Compression and Elevation
Compression is commonly used with the objective of stopping hemorrhage and reducing
swelling (50). Although popular, research on the validity of compression for recovery
enhancement is limited (4, 35, 51) and most support for its application is anecdotal.
Pollard and Cronin (35) concluded there is little evidence available that supports
compression for all soft tissue ankle injuries. The authors could not suggest a definitive
recommendation regarding the level and type of compression. Van der Bekerom (50) had
similar findings, concluding that “evidence to support the use of compression in the
treatment of ankle sprains is limited. No information can be provided about the best way,
amount, and duration of compression or the position in which the compression treatment
is given.”
There is also a lack of definitive evidence that supports compression used in conjunction
with ice therapy when treating an acute musculoskeletal injury. Block (4) completed a
literature review regarding the cold and compression management of musculoskeletal
injuries and found that “the studies are not uniform in their choices of experimental and
control groups, study duration, sample size or surgical procedure, rendering the evidence
diluted.” Until we can definitively prove the validity of utilizing compression with ice in
clinical trials, we cannot assume it expedites the recovery process.
Elevation is commonly used in an effort to reduce swelling in the extremities by increasing
venous return (50). However, “no evidence based on studies with high levels of evidence is
available for the effectiveness of elevation” (50). Bayer et al. (2) concluded that elevation,
along with the rest of the RICE protocol, “is well tolerated by patients, but there is no
evidence that these methods enhance tissue repair.”
It is difficult to assert that compression and elevation are always advantageous when
utilized in a recovery protocol, as clinical research has not yet provided definitive
guidelines on their usage. However, besides the possibility of applying too much pressure
to the limbs and reducing circulation, there are no adverse side effects associated with
applying compression. Consequently, if the application of compression or elevation creates
a placebo effect and makes the athlete, patient, or client feel better during the recovery
process then it may be justified to continue their use. However, prioritizing the application
of compression or elevation over another therapeutic approach is unsubstantiated.
Rest’s Effect on the Physiological Response to Trauma
7/19
Periods of rest following an acute musculoskeletal injury does not enhance the recovery
process. As previously mentioned, the lymphatic system is responsible for draining the
accumulation of waste products from the damaged site. In order to do so, this passive
system relies on the voluntary contraction of the tissues surrounding the site of trauma in
order to produce a propulsive force. Therefore, a period of stillness will not adequately
evacuate the damaged site and the area will remain congested with metabolic waste. This
congestion can delay the completion of the inflammatory process, which will result in an
inability to progress to the processes of repair and remodeling (43).
The process of angiogenesis, which occurs during the phase of repair (phase two of
recovery process), is strongly dependent upon the concentration of VEGF-A, a key
proangiogenic growth factor that is primarily located within skeletal muscle (1). In fact,
clinical studies have shown that revascularization is reduced in the skeletal muscle of
animals as a result of the inhibition of VEGF-A (14). Gustafsson (10) found that “VEGF is
upregulated in human skeletal muscle by a single bout of dynamic exercise.”
Consequently, we can infer that active contraction of the skeletal muscles surrounding the
site of trauma will enhance the body’s ability to revascularize the damaged tissue.
Myostatin, a growth factor responsible for inhibiting muscle growth, has been
hypothesized to play a role in muscle regeneration (40). Hittel et al. (13) concluded that
“aerobic and resistance exercise reduces muscle and circulating myostatin levels in human
subjects.” Therefore, activity following a musculoskeletal injury will inhibit myostatin and
may reduce the possibility of muscular atrophy (muscle loss).
Sandri et al (39) states “maintaining muscle size and fiber composition requires contractile
activity.” Consequently, a period of inactivity will cause the muscles to undergo atrophy
because the circulatory system cannot sufficiently provide nourishment or move waste
from the affected area as a result of the inactivity (35). As a result, “the tissue will become
weaker, less functional, and more susceptible to injury” (35). Therefore, continuing to
activate the musculature surrounding the site of trauma is required in order to maintain
muscle mass and avoid the possibility of reinjuring the tissue.
A More Optimal Approach: Active Recovery
There is an abundance of available information that suggests moving early in the recovery
process is more beneficial than extended periods of stillness (5, 6, 36, 37, 38). Reinl (36)
proposed his own acronym for recovery, ARITA, which stands for “active recovery is the
answer.” Active recovery is a broad term that can include any activity that involves the
contraction of skeletal muscle tissue that was previously subjected to trauma (30). Active
recovery can include activation/mobility exercises or low intensity physical activity that
utilizes pain free movements through a full range of motion. If an injury is minor,
8/19
rehabilitation can begin as early as the next day, assuming there is no pain associated with
the desired movements. However, if the injury is severe, it is best to follow a physician’s
advice on rehabilitation (31).
The validity of performing bouts of active recovery has been examined in multiple studies.
Buckwalter (5) advocated the importance of imposing a load on damaged tissues to
enhance the recovery process stating that “although new approaches to facilitate bone and
fibrous tissue healing have shown promise, none has been proven to offer beneficial effects
comparable to those produced by loading healing tissues.” A study in 2016 compared the
implementation of active recovery to canoeist and football players in an effort to
demonstrate the importance of loading the tissues previously subjected to trauma. One
group performed active recovery sessions targeting the muscles involved in a bout of
exercise while the second group performed activities targeting muscles that were not
utilized during a training session. Based on the findings, the authors concluded that “20
minutes of post- exercise active recovery by working the same muscles that were active
during the fatiguing exercise is more effective in fatigue reduction than active exercise
using those muscles not involved in the fatiguing effort” (30). These findings support the
idea that contraction of utilized tissues facilitates recovery from a training session. The
recovery can likely be attributed to the fact that contraction of the tissues previously
subjected to trauma enhances blood circulation and lymphatic drainage, which facilitates
the successful evacuation of metabolic waste products from the affected area. As a result,
the process of inflammation can be completed, and the next two phases of recovery (repair
and remodeling) can begin.
MEAT (movement, exercise, analgesia, treatment) has been proposed as a more optimal
alternative and effectively addresses the discrepancies surrounding the RICE protocol.
Instead of resting an injury, this acronym suggests moving the damaged area through a
range of motion that is pain free in an effort to provide the propulsive force required to
adequately move lymph throughout the body. Exercise with resistance should be the next
step beyond simple movements. Campbell (6) suggests that eccentric loading should be
prioritized when rehabilitating a tendon injury.
Analgesia, the inability to feel pain, is the third aspect of the MEAT protocol. Pain limits
one’s ability to efficiently move the injured area through a full range of motion. It is quite
common for people to rely on the use of NSAIDs (nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs)
for pain management. Common brand names of NSAIDs include Ibuprofen, Motrin, Aleve,
or Advil. However, it is important to note that the use of NSAIDs will not accelerate, and
may actually delay, the recovery process (44). NSAIDs inhibit the synthesis of
prostaglandins, which initiate inflammation (44). Campbell (6) suggests Tylenol as an
alternative, as it is not an NSAID and will not disrupt the inflammatory process. However,
Tylenol can damage the liver and recommendations on a proper dosage should be
followed.
9/19
The final aspect of the MEAT protocol is treatment. This is a broad category that consists
of treating the individual injury using a variety of therapeutic approaches that are utilized
on a patient to patient basis. Campbell (6) suggests the consumption of certain
supplements/nutrients that reduce inflammation, as well as the application of
rehabilitation modalities such as kinesiology taping or acupuncture.
Another acronym has been proposed in replace of the RICE protocol. Robinson (38)
suggested the application of MOVE (movement, options, vary, ease). The movement
aspect of this protocol mirrors the message from Reinl (36) and Campbell (6), as it
emphasizes the need to move early in the recovery process (38). The other three aspects of
the MOVE protocol place an emphasis on utilizing a variety of treatment options that “vary
rehabilitation with strength, balance and agility drills” (38). Additionally, the protocol
suggests that returning to activity early can help athletes cope with the emotional cost of
the injury which “may be moderated by permission to move immediately” (38).
CONCLUSIONS
The theory of resting an injury while wrapping it tightly with ice to accelerate the recovery
of damaged tissues seems to be completely predicated upon unsubstantiated reports dating
back over four decades. The original support for the argument to ice musculoskeletal
injuries was recanted in 2015 by the founding father of the RICE protocol (31). In
otherwise healthy individuals, the body is well equipped with the means to adequately
remove any accumulation of fluid from the damaged site, as it contains the lymphatic
system that primarily functions to perform such duties. However, it is important to note
that the success of the lymphatic system depends on the body’s ability to provide a
propulsive force that facilitates the movement of lymph through active skeletal muscle
contraction. In other words, movement of the body’s voluntary tissues is vital to the
adequate functioning of this system. Therefore, an extended period of rest following an
injury to a tendon, ligament, or muscle is not the most optimal way to accelerate the
process of tissue regeneration. The notion of moving as much as possible following an
injury is supported by the literature (5, 6, 30, 35, 38).
In addition, the application of ice, or cryotherapy, has been found to not only delay
recovery, but to also damage tissue in the process (9, 20, 27, 49). The evidence suggests
that the application of ice is only necessary if pain reduction is the desired outcome (3, 8,
16, 19, 26). Evidence in support of compression and elevation is lacking, as most studies
are inconclusive (4, 35, 51) and fail to establish definitive application guidelines that are
supported by research. These findings, along with the public recant from Dr. Gabe Mirkin
in 2015 (31), support the premise that the RICE protocol, which is a generally preferred
method of immediate treatment for acute musculoskeletal injuries, is a myth.
10/19
Based on the available literature, a rehabilitation protocol for an acute athletic injury
should prioritize pain free movement through a full range of motion as early as possible
and gradually progress to higher intensities and more complex movements. In addition,
the healthcare professional should evaluate the individual injury and work with the patient
or athlete to decide which therapeutic modalities are most appropriate. If a patient or
athlete believes that compression or elevation is beneficial to their recovery process then
the two modalities can be used, as it has been purported that there are no adverse side
effects associated with their application. The method and duration of the compression
should be at the discretion of the healthcare professional, as no definitive guidelines have
been purported. However, there should be little to no utilization of ice or NSAIDs, unless
the only desired outcome is pain reduction.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
None
REFERENCES
1. Adair, T.H. & Montani, J.P. (2010). Angiogenesis. Chapter 1, Overview of
AngiogenesisMorgan & Claypool Life Sciences. Retrieved from
https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
2. Bayer M, Mackey A, Magnusson P, Krogsgaard M & Kjaer M. (2019, February)
Treatment of Acute Muscle Injuries. Ugeskr Laeger, 181(8). Retrieved from
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
3. Bleakley C, McDonough S & MacAuley D. (2006, August). Cryotherapy for acute
ankle sprains: A randomized controlled study for two different icing protocols.
British Journal of Sports Medicine, 40 (8), 700-705. Doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2006.025932
4. Block, Jon. (2010) Cold and compression in the management of musculoskeletal
injuries and orthopedic operative procedures: a narrative review. Open Access J
Sports Med, 1, 105-113. Doi: 10.2147/oajsm.s11102
5. Buckwalter, J. A., & Grodzinsky, A. J. (1999, September/October). Loading of healing
bone, fibrous tissue, and muscle: Implications for orthopedic practice. Journal of
American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons, 7(5), 291-299. Retrieved from
https://aaos.org/publications
6. Campbell, Ryan. (2013, December) MEAT vs RICE for injury management. Goodmed
Direct Primary Care. Retrieved from https://goodmedclinic.com
7. Chandrasoma, P., & Taylor, C. R. (1998). Concise pathology (3 ed.). Stamford,
Conn: Appleton & Lange.
8. Collins NC. (2008, February). Is ice right? Does cryotherapy improve outcome for
acute soft tissue injury? Emerg Med J, 25 (2), 65-68. Doi: 10.1136/emj.2007.051664
rd
11/19
9. Crystal, N.J., Townson, D.H., Cook, S.B. & LaRoche, D.P. (2013). Effect of
cryotherapy on muscle recovery and inflammation following a bout of damaging
exercise. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 113, 2577–2586.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-013-2693-9
10. Ducheyne, Paul. (2011, August). Comprehensive biomaterials. Philadelphia, PA:
Elsevier Science.
11. Gustafsson, G., Puntschart, A., Kaijser, L., Jansson, E., & Sundberg, C.J. (1999).
Exercise- induced expression of angiogenesis- related transcription and growth
factors in human skeletal muscle. American Journal of Physiology- Heart and
Circulatory Physiology, 276(2), 679-685.
https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.1999.276.2.H679
12. Guyton, A.C. & Hall, J.E. (2000). Textbook of Medical Physiology (10 ed.). W.B.
Saunders, Philadelphia.
13. Hansrani V, Khanbhai M, Bhandari S, Pillai A & McCollum C. (2015, August). The
role of compression in the management of soft tissue injuries: A systemic review. Eur
J Orthop Surg Traumatol, 25(6), 987-995. Doi: 10.1007/s00590-015-1607-4
14. Hittel D, Axelson M, Sarna N, Shearer J, Huffman K & Kraus W. (2010) Myostatin
decreases with aerobic exercise and associates with insulin resistance. Med Sci
Sports Exerc, 42(11), 2023-2029.
https://dx.doi.org/10.1249%2FMSS.0b013e3181e0b9a8
15. Høier, B., Olsen, K., Nyberg, M., Bangsbo, J., & Hellsten, Y. (2010). Contraction-
induced secretion of VEGF from skeletal muscle cells is mediated by adenosine.
American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology, 299 (3), 857-
862. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00082.2010
16. Hubbard T, Aronson S & Denegar C. (2004, January- March). Does cryotherapy
hasten return to participation? A systemic review. J Athl Train, 39(1), 88-94.
Retrieved from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
17. Hubbard T & Denegar C. (2004, September). Does cryotherapy improve outcomes
with soft tissue injury? J Athl Train. 39(3), 278-279. Retrieved from https://
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
18. Ikomi, F., Kawai, Y., & Ohhashi. (2012). Recent advance in lymph dynamic: Analysis
in lymphatics and lymph nodes. Annals of Vascular Diseases, 5(3), 258-268. doi:
10.3400/avd.ra.12.00046
19. Kellet, J. (1986, October). Acute soft tissue injuries- A review of the literature. Med
Sci Sports Exerc, 18(5), 489- 500. Retrieved from http://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
20. Khoshnevis, S, Craik, N, & Diller, K. (2015). Cold-induced vasoconstriction may
persist long after cooling ends: an evaluation of multiple cryotherapy units. Knee
Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 23(9), 2475–2483.
doi:10.1007/s00167-014-2911-y
th
12/19
21. Knebel, F. (2013, January). The right arm of Eddy Knowles. MEDICAL MIRACLES.
Retrieved from medicaltreats.wordpress.com/2013/01/27/the-right-arm-of-eddy-
knowles/.
22. Koshland Science Museum. (2014, September). Tracing similarities and differences
in our DNA. Retrieved from https://www.koshland-science-
museum.org/sites/all/exhibits/exhibitdna/intro03.jsp
23. Leadbetter WB. (1990) An introduction to sports-induced soft tissue inflammation.
In: Leadbetter WB, Buckwalter JB, Gordon SL, eds. Sports-Induced Inflammation.
Park Ridge, IL: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons; 3–23.
24. Linlin, C., Deng, H., Cui, H., Fang, J., Zuo, Z., Li, Y., Wang, X. & Zhao, L. (2017).
Inflammatory responses and inflammation- associated diseases in organs.
Oncotarget, 9(6), 7204-7218. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.23208
25. Lu, H., Huang, D., Saederup, N., Charo, I. F., Ransohoff, R. M., & Zhou, L. (2011).
Macrophages recruited via CCR2 produce insulin-like growth factor-1 to repair acute
skeletal muscle injury. FASEB journal: official publication of the Federation of
American Societies for Experimental Biology, 25(1), 358–369.
https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.10-171579
26. MacAuley, D. (2001, July). Ice therapy: How good is the evidence? International
Journal of Sports Medicine, 22(5), doi: 10.1055/s-2001-15656
27. Meeusen, R., & Lievens, P. (1986). The use of cryotherapy in sports injuries. Sports
Medicine. Vol. 3, 398–414. https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-198603060-00002
28. Melamed E., & Glassberg E., (2002). Non-freezing cold injury in soldiers. Harefuah,
141(12): 1050-1054, 1090. Retrieved from https://ores.su/en/journals/harefuah/
29. Merrick, Mark. (2002, April-June). Secondary injury after musculoskeletal trauma: A
review and update. Journal of Athletic Training, 37 (2): 209-217. Retrieved from
https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
30. Mika, A., Oleksy, Ł., Kielnar, R., Wodka-Natkaniec, E., Twardowska, M., Kamiński,
K., & Małek, Z. (2016). Comparison of two different modes of active recovery on
muscles performance after fatiguing exercise in mountain canoeist and football
players. PloS one, 11(10). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0164216
31. Mirkin, G. (2015, September). Why ice delays recovery. Dr Gabe Mirkin on Health.
Retrieved from www.drmirkin.com/fitness/why-ice-delays-recovery.html.
32. Miyakawa M, Kawashima M, Haba D, Sugiyama M, Taniguchi K & Arakawa T. (2020,
April). Inhibition of the migration of MCP-1 positive cells by icing applied soon after
crush injury to rat skeletal muscle. Acta Histochemica, 122(3).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acthis.2020.151511
33. Nagourney, Eric. (2002, October). “Ronald A. Malt, 70, is dead; Innovator in
reattaching limb.” The New York Times, Section A, Page 32.
34. OpenStax College. (2013). Anatomy & Physiology. Houston, TX: OpenStax CNX.
Retrieved from https://openstax.org/details/books/anatomy-and-physiology
13/19
35. Pollard A & Cronin G. (2005, October) Compression bandaging for soft tissue injury
of the ankle: A literature review. Emergency Nurse: The Journal of the RCN
Accident and Emergency Nursing Association 13(6), 20-25. Doi:
10.7748/en2005.10.13.6.20.c1218
36. Reinl, G. (2013). Iced! The Illusionary Treatment Option, 2 ed. United States of
America: G. Reinl
37. Reinl, G. (2019, February) The cold hard facts: Weighing the evidence. Retrieved
from http://garyreinl.com/articles/The-Cold-Hard-Facts.pdf
38. Robinson, J. (2017, October 18). MOVE an injury not RICE. University of British
Columbia. Retrieved from https://thischangedmypractice.com
39. Ryo T, Naoto F, Takamitsu A, Shigeo K, Naokata I & Akinori M. (2011,
February). Influence of icing on muscle regeneration after crush injury to
skeletal muscles in rats. Journal of Applied Physiology, 110 (2), 382-388.
https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.01187.2010
40. Sandri M, Lin J, Handschin C, Yang W, Arany Z, Lecker S, Goldberg A & Spiegelman
B. (2006, October) PGC-1a protects skeletal muscle from atrophy by suppressing
FoxO3 action and atrophy-specific gene transcription. PNAS 103(44), 16260-16265
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0607795103
41. Sharma M, Langley B, Bass J & Kambadur R. (2001, October). Myostatin in muscle
growth and repair. Exercise and Sport Science Reviews, 29 (4), 155-158. Retrieved
from https://journals.lww.com/acsm-essr
42. Shibaguchi T, Sugiura T, Fujitsu T, Nomura T, Yoshihara T, Naito H, Yoshioka T,
Ogura A & Ohira Y. (2016, July). Effects of icing or heat stress on the induction of
fibrosis and/or regeneration of injured rat soleus muscle. J Physiol Sci, 66(4), 345-
357. Doi: 10.1007/s12576-015-0433-0
43. Singh D, Lonbani, Z, Woodruff M, Parker T, Steck R & Peake J. (2017, March).
Effects of topical icing on inflammation, angiogenesis, revascularization, and
myofiber regeneration in skeletal muscle following contusion injury. Frontiers in
Physiology, Volume 8, 93. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.0009343.
44. Stovitz, S. D., & Johnson, R. J. (2003). NSAIDs and musculoskeletal treatment: What
is the clinical evidence? The Physician and Sportsmedicine, 31(1), 35-52. doi:
10.3810/psm.2003.01.160.
45. Swenson C, Sward L & Karlsson J. (1996, August) Cryotherapy in sports medicine.
Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports, 6(4), 193-200.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0838.1996.tb00090.x
46. Takagi R, Fujita N, Arakawa T, Kawada S, Ishii N & Miki A. (2011, February).
Influence of icing on muscle regeneration after crush injury to skeletal muscles in
rats. Journal of Applied Physiology, 110 (2), 382-388.
https://doi.org/10,1152/applphysiol.01187.2010
nd
14/19
47. Thorsson O. (2001, March) Cold therapy of athletic injuries. Current literature
review. Lakartidiningen, 98(13), 1512-1513. Retrieved from
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
48. Tomaras, S. (2018, February 27) Exacerbation of Inflammation by Aggressive Cold
Therapy: Preventing Microcellular Ice Crystal Injury. An Alternative to Conventional
R.I.C.E. Therapy.
49. Tseng, C., Lee, J.P., Tsai, Y.S., Lee, S.D., Kao, C.L., Liu, T.C., Lai, C. & Kuo, C.H.
(2013). Topical cooling (Icing) delays recovery from eccentric exercise- induced
muscle damage. Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 27(5), 1354- 1361.
Doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e318267a22c
50. Van den Bekerom M, Struijs P, Blankevoort L, Welling L, Van Dijk C & Kerkoffs G.
(2012, July/August). What is the evidence for rest, ice, compression and elevation
therapy in the treatment of ankle sprains in adults? Journal of Athletic Training,
47(4), 435-443. Doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-47.4.14.
51. Wantanabe, S., Misharin, A.V., & Budinger, S., (2019). The role of macrophages in
the resolution of inflammation. J Clin Invest, 129(7), 2619- 2628. doi:
10.1172/JCI124615
52. White, G., Rhind, S., Wells, G., (2014, November) The effect of various cold-water
immersion protocols on exercise-induced inflammatory response and functional
recovery from high-intensity sprint exercise. Eur J Appl Physiol. 114(11):2353‐2367.
doi:10.1007/s00421-014-2954-2
53. Yamane M, Ohnishi N, Matsumoto T. (2015, July) Does regular post-exercise cold
application attenuate trained muscle adaptation? International Journal of Sports
Medicine 36(8):647‐653. doi:10.1055/s-0034-1398652
FIGURES AND TABLES
Table 1: Summarization of publications that support the use of any aspect of the R.I.C.E.
Protocol
15/19
Author Major Findings
Icing
Kellett
(1986,
October)
“Cryotherapy (crushed ice) for 10 to 20 min, 2 to 4 times/day for the first 2
to 3 days is helpful in promoting early return to full activity.”
Swenson,
Sward &
Karlsson
(1996,
August)
“The application of cold has also been found to decrease the inflammatory
reaction in an experimental situation. Cold appears to be effective and
harmless and few complications or side-effects after the use of cold
therapy are reported. Prolonged application at very low temperatures
should, however, be avoided as this may cause serious side-effects, such
as frost-bite and nerve injuries.”
MacAuley
(2001)
“It is concluded that ice is effective but should be applied in repeated
application of 10 minutes to be most effective, avoid side effects, and
prevent possible further injury.”
Hubbard,
Aronson &
Denegar
(2004, Jan-
Mar)
“Our review of the 4 randomized, controlled clinical trials suggests that
cryotherapy may be effective in reducing the time to return to
participation; however, the extremely low quality of the studies reviewed is
of concern. Despite the extensive use of cryotherapy in the management
of acute musculoskeletal injury, few investigators have actually examined
the effect of cryotherapy alone on return to participation.”
Bleakley,
McDonough
& MacAuley
(2006,
August)
“Intermittent applications may enhance the therapeutic effect of ice in pain
relief after acute soft tissue injury.” However, “there were no significant
differences between groups in terms of function, swelling, or pain at rest.”
Singh et al.
(2017,
March)
“In conclusion, although icing disrupted inflammation and some aspects of
angiogenesis/revascularization, these effects did not result in substantial
differences in capillary density or muscle growth.”
Compression
Hansrani et
al. (2015,
August)
“Compression may be an effective tool in the management of ankle
injuries and has been shown to reduce swelling and improve quality of life
in single studies. Definitive conclusions are hampered by the poor quality
of evidence and the variety of treatments used. The most effective form of
compression to treat ankle sprains or is yet to be determined. Adequately
designed randomized control trials are clearly needed.”
Table 2: Summarization of publications that refute any aspect of the R.I.C.E Protocol
Author Major Findings
16/19
Icing
Meeusen &
Lievens
(1986, Nov-
Dec)
“When ice is applied to a body part for a prolonged period, nearby
lymphatic vessels begin to dramatically increase their permeability. As
lymphatic permeability is enhanced, large amounts of fluid begin to pour
from the lymphatics in the wrong direction, increasing the amount of local
swelling and pressure and potentially contributing to greater pain.”
Thorsson
(2001,
March)
“Experimental studies, however, show no effect of cryotherapy on muscle
regeneration, and no controlled clinical study has shown a significant
effect in emergency treatment of soft tissue sports injuries.”
Hubbard &
Denegar
(2004, Jul-
Sep)
“Based on the available evidence, cryotherapy seems to be effective in
decreasing pain. In comparison with other rehabilitation techniques, the
efficacy of cryotherapy has been questioned. The exact effect of
cryotherapy on more frequently treated acute injuries (eg, muscle strains
and contusions) has not been fully elucidated.”
Collins
(2008,
February)
“There is insufficient evidence to suggest that cryotherapy improves
clinical outcome in the management of soft tissue injuries.”
Takagi et al.
(2011,
February)
Icing applied soon after a muscle crush injury could have retarded
proliferation and differentiation of satellite cells at the early stages of
regeneration through retardation of degeneration and macrophage
migration, which play a crucial role in muscle regeneration, and could
have induced not only a delay in late stages of muscle regeneration but
also impairment of muscle regeneration along with a thicker collagen
deposition around the regenerating muscle fibers. Judging from these
findings, it might be better to avoid icing, although it has been widely used
in sports medicine.
van den
Bekerom et
al. (2012,
August)
“Based on our review, evidence from RCTs to support the use of ice in the
treatment of acute ankle sprains is limited.”
Tseng et al.
(2013, May)
“Topical cooling, a commonly used clinical intervention, seems to not
improve but rather delay recovery from eccentric exercise- induced
muscle damage.”
Crystal,
Townson,
Cook &
LaRoche
(2013,
October)
“20 min of cryotherapy was ineffective in attenuating the strength
decrement and soreness seen after muscle-damaging exercise but may
have mitigated the rise in plasma CCL2 concentration. These results do
not support the use of cryotherapy during recovery.”
17/19
Yamane,
Ohnishi &
Matsumoto
(2015, July)
“Regular post-exercise cold application to muscles might attenuate
muscular and vascular adaptations to resistance training.”
Khoshnevis,
Craik &
Diller (2015,
September)
“The condition of reduced blood flow persists long after cooling is stopped
and local temperatures have rewarmed towards the normal range,
indicating that the maintenance of vasoconstriction is not directly
dependent on the continuing existence of a cold state. The depressed
blood flow may dispose tissue to NFCI (non- freezing cold injury).”
Tomares
(2018,
February)
“R.I.C.E. therapy should strive to avoid sub-0°C conditions when
possible” due to the potential risks of injury and exacerbation of
inflammation associated with such conditions.
Bayer et al.
(2019,
February)
“The application of ice, compression, and elevation is well tolerated by
patents, but there is no evidence that these methods enhance tissue
repair.”
Miyakawa
et al. (2020,
April)
“Numbers of the neutrophils at 3 h after the injury and the MCP-1+ cells at
6 h and later after the injury in the icing group were significantly lower
than those in the non-icing group, suggesting that these phenomena
contribute to the retardation of macrophage migration.”
Rest
Buckwalter
&
Grodzinsky
(1999, Sep-
Oct)
“Although new approaches to facilitate bone and fibrous tissue healing
have shown promise, none has been proven to offer beneficial effects
comparable to those produced by loading healing tissues.”
Campbell
(2013,
December)
“RICE does have a place at the table for injury management, but it should
be used sparingly and in very specific injury situations. In general, for
most injuries, the MEAT approach should make up the majority of the
treatment.”
Robinson
(2017,
October)
“Ice is out. I reserve anti-inflammatories for inflammatory arthropathies.
Patients can choose. Use compression if you believe it works, and elevate
if you like, but I prefer calf pump exercises, walking and cross training.
Light strength and agility exercises can start right away. I permit
resumption of training and practices as soon as the patient is strong
enough, with gradual easing back to full participation.”
Compression
Pollard &
Cronin
(2005)
“Little evidence is available to support this type of treatment.”
18/19
van den
Bekerom et
al. (2012,
August)
“Based on our review, evidence from RCTs to support the use of
compression in the treatment of acute ankle sprains is limited. No
information can be provided about the best way, amount, and duration of
compression or the position in which compression treatment is given
(recumbent or elevated).”
Elevation
van den
Bekerom et
al. (2012,
August)
“No randomized trials were found and included in this review, so no
evidence based on studies with high levels of evidence is available for the
effectiveness of elevation.”
19/19
