Safe spaces or a pedagogy of discomfort? Senior high-school teachers’ meta-emotion philosophies and climate change education

Abstract

The aim of this study is to explore senior high-school teachers’ beliefs about the role of emotions in climate change education and their perception of how they deal with emotional reactions in the classroom. The theoretical framework consists of meta-emotion philosophies, teachers’ beliefs, and critical emotion theories. Sixteen Swedish teachers were interviewed. Four overarching emotion beliefs were identified: a disapproving view, a danger-oriented view, a partial acceptance view, and a complexity view. Four overarching coaching themes were found: avoidance, action-based and reappraisal-based coaching, strategies to approach negative emotions, and flexibility and adjustment-based coaching. Implications for teacher education are discussed.
Supplemental data for this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2020.1845589.

Full text

Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at
https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=vjee20
The Journal of Environmental Education
ISSN: (Print) (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/vjee20
Safe spaces or a pedagogy of discomfort? Senior
high-school teachers’ meta-emotion philosophies
and climate change education
Maria Ojala
To cite this article: Maria Ojala (2020): Safe spaces or a pedagogy of discomfort? Senior high-
school teachers’ meta-emotion philosophies and climate change education, The Journal of
Environmental Education
To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2020.1845589
© 2020 The Author(s). Published with
license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
View supplementary material
Published online: 08 Dec 2020.
Submit your article to this journal
View related articles
View Crossmark data

RESEARCH ARTICLE
THE JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION
Safe spaces or a pedagogy of discomfort? Senior high-school
teachers’ meta-emotion philosophies and climate change
education
Maria Ojala
Center for Environmental and Sustainability Social Science (CESSS), Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the
original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way.
CONTACT Maria Ojala maria.ojala@oru.se School of Law, Psychology, and Social Work, Department of Psychology, Örebro
University, Örebro, Sweden
https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2020.1845589
KEYWORDS
climate change education;
ESD;
emotions;
teacher’s beliefs;
meta-emotion
philosophies;
coping
ABSTRACT
The aim of this study is to explore senior high-school teachers’ beliefs about
the role of emotions in climate change education and their perception of how
they deal with emotional reactions in the classroom. The theoretical frame-
work consists of meta-emotion philosophies, teachers’ beliefs, and critical
emotion theories. Sixteen Swedish teachers were interviewed. Four overarch-
ing emotion beliefs were identified: a disapproving view, a danger-oriented
view, a partial acceptance view, and a complexity view. Four overarching
coaching themes were found: avoidance, action-based and reappraisal-based
coaching, strategies to approach negative emotions, and flexibility and adjust
-
ment-based coaching. Implications for teacher education are discussed.
In recent years researchers have started to argue for the importance of including emotional aspects in
education for sustainable development (ESD). Two arguments are often used: The first concerns that the
complexity and seriousness of sustainability challenges such as climate change can evoke negative emo-
tions of, for instance, worry and guilt among students. The argument is that this needs to be taken into
account in educational efforts in order to prevent feelings of hopelessness and promote hope and agency
(Gardiner & Rieckmann, 2015; Hicks, 2014; Jie Li & Monroe, 2019; Kerret et al., 2016; Ojala, 2015;
Stevenson & Peterson, 2015) as well as motivating action (Carmi et al., 2015). The second concerns the
political dimension of ESD and the importance of utilizing diversity and taking account of different
value-laden commitments. In this regard, conflicts will inevitably occur when educating about sustain-
ability issues, and educators need to take these and related emotions into account in order to prevent
deadlocks and to promote constructive learning (Håkansson & Östman, 2019; Lundegård & Wickman,
2007; Sund & Öhman, 2014; Wals, 2007). Thus, taking emotions into account in ESD is vital both to
avoid hopelessness and to handle conflicts constructively. In addition, some ESD researchers seem to
adhere to the idea that emotions and cognition are closely related and that paying attention to emotional
reactions can sometimes lead to new important insights into how to deal with sustainability issues (Manni
et al., 2017; Ojala, 2019). This is a view that is also supported by basic research in psychology and neu-
roscience (Pessoa, 2008; Phelps, 2006).
However, what is still largely missing in the literature is an exploration of teachers’ views about the
role of emotions in ESD. These views are important to investigate since they may influence how teachers
act in the classroom (Ciucci et al., 2015; Ciucci et al., 2018). Therefore, the aim of the present study is to
explore a group of Swedish senior high-school teachers’ beliefs about emotions in climate change education
Supplemental data for this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2020.1845589.
© 2020 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC

2 M. OJALA
and their perception of how they deal with and coach students’ emotions in the classroom, i.e., how they
act when students give expression to emotions about climate change. Climate change is perhaps the most
urgent and serious of all sustainability challenges, and the need to prepare people for societal transfor-
mation in relation to this threat is often emphasized (UN, 2015). The theory of meta-emotion philosophies
from psychology and the concept of teacher’s beliefs from education will be used as a theoretical frame-
work. In addition, the results will be discussed in relation to ideas about emotions in the neoliberal society,
i.e., how larger cultural and structural emotion norms influence views on emotions in a micro-context.
Teachers, emotions, and emotions coaching in the classroom
Boler (1999) launched the theoretical concept “a pedagogy of discomfort” that explicitly acknowledges
that discomforting emotional aspects are part of educating about sensitive and controversial societal
issues, and that educators and students need to engage in a critical inquiry of emotional positions toward
the issue at hand. This could for instance include an evaluation of emotional investments in different
ideological positions (Boler, 1999) or a critical awareness of different ways of coping with emotions
evoked (see Ojala, 2019).
Educators are not seldom important role models for their students concerning emotion regulation in
the classroom (Ashiabi, 2000; Ojala, 2015; Zembylas et al., 2014). For instance, studies indicate that
teachers sometimes influence student’s emotions as well as how students cope with them. Regarding
educating about societal problems, Zembylas and colleagues (2014) identified pedagogical strategies
with which emotions are schooled that classify certain emotions as ‘appropriate’ and others as ‘inappro-
priate.’ In addition, a study demonstrated that students who perceived their teachers as not taking seriously
their negative emotions concerning societal problems were more inclined to de-emphasize the seriousness
of climate change than students who felt that their teachers respected and validated their emotions (Ojala,
2015). What then can explain how teachers act? In this study, the theories of teacher’s beliefs and
meta-emotion philosophies and some thoughts about emotions in a neoliberal society will be used to
shed light on this question.
Teacher’s beliefs and meta-emotion philosophies
The concept of ‘teacher beliefs’ has been used extensively to comprehend teachers’ decision-making and
acting in the classroom (Biesta et al., 2015; Calderhead, 1996; Molin et al., 2015; Nespor, 1987; Pajares,
1992). Pajares describes this concept as teachers’ assumptions about every aspect that is of importance
for the teaching/learning process (the subject, how to teach, the students, etc.) and that these assumptions
can have an impact on how the teachers act in specific learning situations (Pajares, 1992). To take one
concrete example, Biesta et al. (2015) explored teachers’ beliefs about their students, the purpose of
education, and the role of the teacher. Teachers’ beliefs contain both evaluations from the past, such as
a general belief that certain groups of students are “bright,” but also consists of future intentions and
expectations about who will succeed and who will not. In the ESD research field, Sund has shown that
different teaching traditions can also be identified in teachers’ way of talking about their ESD teaching
and in how they interact with their students in the classroom (Sund, 2008; Sund & Wickman, 2011a).
Teachers’ beliefs about emotions and their role in ESD have, however, not been in focus before. One
exception is a study showing that a group of teachers thought that ESD can frighten students and erode
hope and that the teachers therefore sometimes avoided talking about aspects that they thought were
too provocative in terms of emotion (Cross, 1998). Thus, the teachers’ views of emotions seemed to
influence their didactic choices. This study is small and atheoretical, however.
In order to comprehend teachers’ beliefs about emotions in the learning process and how they act, I
will use the theory of meta-emotion philosophies. Meta-emotion philosophy is defined as an organized
set of emotions and beliefs regarding one’s own and other people’s emotions (Gottman et al., 1997; Katz
et al., 2012). The term was created in relation to parents and their children. It is about awareness of
emotions, acceptance of emotions, and handling/coaching of emotions. An important part of this concept

THE JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION 3
is how emotions are described, including metaphors of emotions, for instance, a view of sadness as being
a limited resource. The theory of meta-emotion philosophy is built on social learning theory, where
parents learn how to value and handle their own emotions from important role models, which influence
how they later will perceive their own children’s emotions (Katz et al., 2012). Meta-emotion philosophies
have an indirect effect, since they influence how parents interact with their child in emotion-laden sit-
uations, which can effect how children cope with emotions (Katz et al., 2012).
Studies on teachers and meta-emotions philosophies are very rare, however, and are more or less
non-existent in relation to education about larger societal problems. Exceptions are two quantitative
studies about meta-emotion philosophies among early-childhood teachers (Ciucci et al., 2015; 2018)
and a masters’ thesis dealing with the association between teachers’ meta-emotions and students’ academic
performance and bonding to school (Ming Yan, 2010). In addition, Zembylas (2004) explored one science
teacher’s metaphors about her own emotions in the learning situation, and he identified both frustra-
tion-based metaphors and excitement-based metaphors. Leaning on empirical support from research
about parents’ meta-emotion philosophies, all these studies take their starting point in the assumption
that teachers’ meta-emotion philosophies most probably influence how they act and react (coach) in the
classroom in emotion-laden situations. This hypothesis has recently been supported in studies with
preschool teachers (see Ciucci et al., 2018; Ornaghi et al., 2020). No study, however, has dealt with
meta-emotion philosophies in relation to educating about sustainability problems.1
Emotion norms in the neoliberal society
Teachers’ meta-emotion philosophies and beliefs about emotions in education can be influenced by
personal experiences, but also by larger cultural and societal factors and emotion norms. Besides regu-
lation through policy documents, today’s neoliberal society governs by creating new mentalities about,
for example, what is important to learn (Davies & Bansel, 2007). One way of governing that is particularly
interesting for this study is to steer through emotions (Ecclestone & Hayes, 2008). The sociologist Bauman
has argued that there is a fear of negative emotions in the neoliberal society. Emotions such as worry and
sadness take time to deal with, make people ponder existential, moral, and societal issues, and thereby
disturb the need for constant production and consumption that is so vital for the neoliberal economic
order to work (Bauman & Donskis, 2013). Instead, there is a frantic focus on positive and pleasurable
emotions that most readily are increased through consumption. These emotions can gloss over societal
problems and hinder societal critique.
Others have argued that the neoliberal society steers and governs emotions through privatizing emo-
tions such as hope and worry, turning them into an issue of the individual and not as something influenced
by societal factors (Amsler, 2015; Thompson & Zizek, 2013). This goes hand in hand with notions that
larger structures are impossible to change, and that the only way people can contribute to society is to
act at an individual level, preferably as a consumer. This can promote a sense of powerlessness, as people
realize that this is not enough but are unable to identify any alternative options.
Regarding education, Ecclestone and Hayes (2008) argue that the quite common focus on emotional
competence as part of the school curriculum in order to promote young people’s wellbeing and positive
emotions can be perceived as a political tool to undercut social criticism. This educational approach
promotes a therapeutic culture in which emotions are soothed and domesticated in order to keep young
people in their place and turn them into obedient consumers. Leaning on Ahmed’s (2010) theories about
the cultural politics of emotions, Ideland (2016) has shown how a focus in the ESD classroom on positive
emotions such as hope and a promise of happiness if one acts in certain ways in relation to sustainability
problems, excludes some students who do not feel and act in the right way. These students are seen as
being unable to contribute to a sustainable future.
Aim and research questions
The aim of the present study is to explore two aspects of the meta-emotion concept among a group of
Swedish senior high-school teachers and in relation to teaching about climate change. The following

4 M. OJALA
questions guided the analyses of the interviews: (1) How do teachers describe the role of different
emotions in teaching about climate change? (2) How do teachers talk about their handling/coaching
of emotional reaction in the classroom when teaching about climate change?
Method
Procedure
Swedish senior high-school teachers in geography who teach about climate change were interviewed.
Senior high school is not mandatory in Sweden and follows a nine-year compulsory school. Most students
are in the age-group 16 to 19 years. Geography in senior high school is only mandatory for students who
have chosen to study the social science program or the natural science program with a special focus on
social science (Skolverket, 2011). Both these are college-preparatory study programs.
The methodological approach in the empirical study is phenomenological in the sense that it is the
participants’ subjective experiences and interpretations of the object of study that is in focus (Smith &
Osborn, 2003). A stratified purposeful sampling approach was chosen to select the target group (Patton,
2001). The factors of gender, age/experience, and teaching subjects besides geography (natural science/
social science) were taken account of in the sampling process.
Semi-structured individual interviews were chosen as a data collection method. The interviews were
performed by phone, and the teachers were most often in a home context, sometimes in school, when
they answered the questions. A semi-structured interview is based on an interview guide where a number
of topics of theoretical interest guide the interviews (see Supplementary material Appendix 1). The
interviews are conducted as discussions around these themes and the order of the questions in the inter-
view is not completely fixed but can be changed depending on how the conversation develops (Drever,
1995). The interviews were recorded and written down verbatim to allow analysis of the material.
Participants
In all 16 teachers were interviewed, eight females and eight males. The respondents were in the ages
between 39 and 61 years old. They had worked in-between 8 and 27 years as a teacher. Thirteen of the
teachers combined geography with social science subjects or history and three combined it with natural
science subjects. The teachers interviewed were teaching at all levels of senior high school and in different
programs.
Analysis
A thematic coding was performed on the data (Braun & Clarke, 2006). The coding is descriptive and is
aimed at identifying more overarching themes, not in-depth analysis of individual life stories. First, every
interview was read through to get a good understanding of them. A first free coding concerning every-
thing that has to do with emotions was performed. A deductive coding phase followed, based on parts
of the theory of meta-emotions, with a focus on (1) views of emotions and (2) handling/coaching of
emotions (Gottman et al., 1997; Katz et al., 2012). Separate documents were created for these two main
themes of meta-emotions. Text were excerpted from each interview and placed under one of these themes.
Thereafter, an inductive phase followed where themes and subthemes specific for this material and this
setting were identified. The theme was noted in the margin of the transcript along with other comments.
Thereafter, blocks of text were ordered under the subthemes. Illustrative quotations, representative for
the themes, were chosen. A spreadsheet was constructed for each main theme, and all the identified
subthemes for that theme were placed on the left-hand side of the sheet and for each interviewed person
it was marked if they had mentioned that theme or not. This was done in order to get a more holistic
sense of the results concerning beliefs and views of emotions, but was also intended to try to capture a
glimpse of how views of emotion and coaching go together.

THE JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION 5
Results
In this section the results of the interviews are presented. First, the more holistic coding of beliefs and
views of emotions is presented. Here, some teachers fit foremost into one prototype/theme, while others
fit into to more than one of the four themes. Second, the themes regarding coaching are presented, and
in this case most of the teachers use several of the described coaching strategies. Quotations are used to
illustrate themes and subthemes.
Beliefs and views of emotions
Regarding acceptance and beliefs about emotions in the classroom (focus worry, hopelessness, hope, and
anger/irritation2) and their role in learning about climate change, four themes are present. The first is
that some teachers have a disapproving view and see emotions, both positive, but foremost negative
emotions, as mostly negative and they largely disapprove of emotions as part of the learning process, or
explicitly state that the teacher should not focus on emotions in the classroom: “…we take our starting
point in facts and what science actually says, instead of taking our starting point in emotions …” (Linda3).
Climate change is largely seen as a “pure” scientific issue. There is also a tendency toward a non-awareness
of emotions, since they are seldom mentioned spontaneously by the respondents.
Emotions are seen as mostly irrational, that is, negative feelings that are not based on facts about
reality. They are manipulated by destructive information from the media; they are even totally unnec-
essary as one teacher claims: “…after all, there is no reason for them to feel that way (Peter).” Negative
emotions of worry are to a certain aspect seen as paralyzing people—they make people passive; when
people feel worried, nothing will be done. Some also mention that negative emotions are not important:
they are just shallow reactions; students don’t really feel that strongly about climate change. For example,
one teacher states that he gets surprised when students want to talk about emotions in relation to cli-
mate change:
You get a little surprised sometimes when they, someone stops and asks about…, you might not think that they
think in such trajectories, for example, what I said about the storm coming, “can it be dangerous or?” (Sebastian)
The second theme concerns a danger-oriented view of negative emotions in relation to climate change
and teaching. In contrast to the first theme, the view of negative emotions of worry, guilt, and hopelessness
is that they can be well grounded, that is, they are not irrational, but that they are dangerous and not
constructive from a learning perspective. Negative emotions of guilt and worry are heavy burdens to
bear and can be related to a low sense of wellbeing. However, the teachers sometimes also acknowledge
that worry is positive in the sense that it shows that the students care about climate change:
So it’s not good if they’re worried, or it is not good if it, so to speak, affects their mental health…But I think, at the
same time, it is a, a justified worry (Hugo).
I think the worry is justified, but worry doesn’t always lead to constructive action (Anne). No. In what way, then, if
you were to develop this a little? (Interviewer) Because worry is often very, rather, paralyzing and non-constructive
(Anne)
In contrast to the first theme, these teachers seem to focus quite a lot on emotions in the classroom
and are aware of emotional reactions among the students. One of the most important things in educating
about climate change is to combat negative emotions, foremost hopelessness, and to evoke hope. Hope
is seen as something important and more or less purely positive from a learning perspective. It is also
seen as something that can replace fear and worry.
Yes, it [hope] is something positive. (Elisabeth) Okay. Are there any negative aspects of hope then? (Interviewer)
No, I don’t know. (Elisabeth)
So I try to communicate that there is, that it looks dark, but that there is hope…Worry if it just weighs you down,
that I think, then it is something negative, if it makes you do nothing. (Carl)

6 M. OJALA
The third theme concerns a partially accepting view of emotions in relation to climate change educa-
tion. Here a distinction is made between different negative emotions. The view of worry, guilt, and
hopelessness is about the same as in the second theme. What characterizes this theme is instead that the
teachers mention anger-related emotional reactions quite frequently. Frustration and irritation are seen
as constructive negative emotions that are actively used in the classroom. For instance, one teacher uses
role play to get students to experience injustice concretely, which makes them frustrated but also engaged.
The view is that they learn more and also can become more pro-social. Anger is seen as an active emotion,
a motivational force, and is talked about in relation to concepts such as strength, the opposite of being
stupid, critique, and as an exciting feeling. Thus, the core theme is that some negative emotions are
passive, like worry, hopelessness, while some are seen as active, like anger.
…anger is after all a good reaction. I think it gives them an opportunity to question things and that they are critical
… (Dan)
It’s probably some kind of competition instinct… that feeling I can exploit a little (Andy - talking about
frustration).
The fourth, and most uncommon theme, is about a complex view of emotions in the classroom. This
concerns a more multifaceted view of emotions, where all kinds of negative emotions and positive emo-
tions can be beneficial in some circumstances, but in other situations they are not. This depends on the
characteristics of the situation and/or the specific students. Negative emotions can be active, even worry,
but they can also be something less positive, based on false information or leading to a low sense of
wellbeing. Hope can also be a positive force, but sometimes it is rather similar to wishful thinking. It is
a positive challenge to work with emotional aspects and to adjust to the situation and to the students.
The view is that you cannot avoid the dark side of climate change since, for instance, worry is rationally
grounded and is understandable.
It is quite natural to feel a certain amount of despair…I probably see it more as a sign that it (climate change) is
perceived as important. I probably don’t think it affects learning negatively but rather that it…is part of what makes
you actually care about it and want to learn about it and try to understand. (Sarah) Do you think this feeling will
change during the course…? (Interviewer) It’s probably differ from individual to individual…You can handle it in
different ways. Either you choose to just take this in and then ignore it in your future life or it can even lead to
becoming politically involved. (Sarah)
So I can think that a certain form of worry…is something good (Christina)
Handling/coaching of emotional reactions
Four broad themes are present when the teachers describe their handling and coaching of emotional
reactions in the classroom. These four themes contain eight subthemes, in all, which are
described below.
The first theme is about (1) Avoiding negative emotional reactions, which is a rather common approach
among the teachers. The first subtheme concerns (1a) fact-based distraction where the teachers try to
avoid and counteract negative emotional reactions by focusing on scientific facts and on the subject
content of the course. Another strategy is to show in a social science sense how everything is intercon-
nected (for example, society and nature) in an active attempt to avoid and calm down emotional
reactions.
I think that what you should do is to relate it to a scientific basis, because today there’s so much discussion about
climate change in the media, and there’s such a lack of knowledge, as I see it…In society today there’s so much
apocalyptic talk about the climate issue, it’s about disasters and doom, and this creates a lot of anxiety in young
people. For no good reason, really…(Anne)
Well, to counter this, I usually think, this is something there’s a lot of nonsense movies about, on TV and elsewhere,
that you can, like: “Well, that’s the sort of thing you can, like, forget about,” but you still try to be factual, based on
the, the reports and what research tells us today. (Sebastian)
Yeah, but then I usually look at what it’s for, what are the sources, what do they refer to, so we feel that we’re basing
this on facts and what science really tells us, instead of simply relying on how we feel, because it’s really a matter of
looking at what is actually happening…(Linda)

THE JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION 7
The second subtheme is about the (1 b) suppression of negative emotions in the classroom where teachers
try to neutralize negative emotions as much as possible through, for instance, ignoring emotions in the
classroom. The teachers also think about avoiding giving expression to their own negative emotions of,
for instance, worry and hopelessness when teaching about climate change. Some, although not many,
mention that they avoid touching upon certain topics such as worst-case scenarios related to cli-
mate change.
And then I try, I mean I myself might think these are really tricky problems and…but I do try to conceal my [laugh-
ing], my own sort of half-pessimistic outlook…(Hugo)
Yes, but what do you think when students express this sort of thing? (Interviewer) Well, I guess I think I want to try
to, to … well, but sort of downplay that feeling a bit. (Andy)
How do you feel when students express this resignation? (Interviewer) I really don’t want them to feel like that,
what, I feel…Well, it affects me emotionally, I feel I don’t want to do this, I can’t go on like this, I don’t want to show
this movie, if there was a movie or…(Elisabeth)
The third subtheme is about (1c) replacing negative emotions with positive emotions. In this regard,
teachers do not see emotions in general as being irrational but perceive negative emotions as not being
beneficial in the classroom and as somewhat scary. When students give expression to, for instance, worry,
they directly try to promote hope. Another strategy is to use humor to defuse negative emotional reac-
tions. Yet another way to deal with the students’ emotional reactions is to emphasize the positive things
that will happen if we succeed in fighting and adapting to climate change, including co-benefits.
Do you usually try to counter student in some way when they express feelings like these? (Interviewer) Yes, I always
try to give encouragement and…Things should be positive and cheerful when you socialize in school, sort of.
(Peter)
Naw, they usually think it’s, I mean it’s, it’s nothing, it’s sort of, you do it sort of tongue-in-cheek, you don’t do it to,
like, blame anybody, so there’s both laughs and jokes about how bad things are…(Elisabeth)
Yeah, it’s to keep their hopes up, that all is not lost. (Maria) Keep their hopes up, that all is not lost? (Interviewer)
Yeah, exactly, that it’s not, there shouldn’t be any disaster scenarios…you should try to do it in a such a way that
they don’t get discouraged. It’s easier to teach about the climate issue in particular if you’re a little hopeful, not seeing
things negatively (Maria)
A second main theme is about (2) Action-based and reappraisal-based coaching, which the teachers
mention frequently. Here, the first subtheme is that the teachers either try to handle reactions of worry
and helplessness, or evoke hope, by using (2 b) individual problem-solving approaches. This is about
showing the students what they can do at an individual level to contribute to the fight against climate
change. The focus is on things the students can do at an individual level in everyday life to live in a more
climate-friendly way, while referring to collective climate-friendly actions is more or less absent in the
teachers’ stories.4
…then I felt that the hardest part was this hopelessness, the feeling that, well, it’s all over, it’s all going down the
drain, there’s nobody, nothing, no possibility, and then I feel it’s important to explain that there are things we can
do. (Michael)
But if the students were to express anxiety in the classroom, what would you do? (Interviewer) I would try to turn
it around to seeing that we can have an impact. And consider what choices we ourselves can make and try to think
that it, what positive changes we can make, that doing all sorts of little things is better than doing nothing. (Sarah)
Yeah, but then, you can bring up changes, too, how…We have students who, in this group that is, that got it decided,
for example, that we would eat vegetarian food once a week, that the lighting in the lavatories could be changed,
and what you do makes a difference…(Melinda)
A second subtheme concerns (2b) promoting trust in others and in the possibility that things can change
as a way to deal with students’ worry, but foremost to promote a hopeful view of the future. Here the
teachers do not try to replace negative emotions with hope but rather to reappraise the situation, which
involves a recognition of the negative and dark aspects of climate change. This subtheme concerns pro-
moting trust in technology, trust in the political system, and trust in the business sector by showing good
examples from these sectors. It could also involve emphasizing that even though it looks dark, there are

8 M. OJALA
also positive trends; for instance, some things have improved lately, such as society’s knowledge about
climate change.
Because sometimes they ask things like: “But what do you think? Will we be able to cope with this?” And I say “Yes,
I actually think we will,” making it clear that we have the knowledge and the technical and economic capacity to
solve these problems…(Patrick)
Yeah, what should I say…you can see politics as being predetermined and that we can’t do anything, but I think the
political side is making progress, sort of. Show them the organizations that are working for change, sort of. (Carl)
Yeah, well there are always, I think you can see, like, positive examples anyway…That people are doing something
to change the situation, and that’s positive, I think. (Linda)
A much less commonly mentioned main theme is to (3) approach negative emotions in the classroom.
A few of the teachers (3a) confront emotions in a therapeutic way. This first subtheme concerns approach-
ing emotion in order to handle and regulate them. It could be a matter of simply talking about the
emotions, listening to the students in a humble way, showing in a respectful manner that the teacher
cares about the students’ feelings. In this subtheme, the teachers in a way dwell for a while with the
students in their emotions or let them express their emotions in a different way, for instance, through
art and music.
OK. But did you try to counter the students when they express this…resignation? (Interviewer) Yes, but it’s like
important to, yeah, but I acknowledge that they feel that way, so like, it’s important to show that you, you hear and
see that feeling… But it’s not like you need to try to brighten things up right away…that seems a bit superficial…
(Elisabeth)
But what do you do if the students express anxiety in the classroom? (Interviewer) Well, that’s when we talk about
it! (Maria)
They can put on a play about it or start a rock band…(Melinda) But you related that to the fact they’re often get
glum, or the message is a bit dreary and that can be hard, how do you tie this all together? (Interviewer) Well, that
this is another way to, if you frankly say it right out as you would in a scientific report, then it’ll just be “This is going
down the drain,” and the message in the music can also be like that, but that, you’re appealing to another part of the
brain, that it can come in a cultural way or something like that. (Melinda)
A second subtheme is about (3b) confronting and using emotions to promote critical thinking. This is
not at all a common theme, and when it is present it concerns putting worry and hopelessness into words,
trying to analyze what it is based on, and whether it is a rational reaction. However, any more advanced
analysis of these emotions from a critical social science perspective is absent among the teachers. In
addition, the teachers who have a partial acceptance view of emotions focus a lot on how to deal with
anger, frustration, and irritation in the classroom. Since they perceive these emotional reactions as
something positive, they use them to promote learning and critical thinking about, for instance, global
injustices related to climate change. Sometimes they even actively evoke these feelings in their students
in order to enhance the learning process.
…you have to appeal to their feelings a little, but you can’t just, you can’t just leave students with their feeling…you
also need to make sure you work through it and come out on the other end, hopefully a bit wiser…, with a few more
alternatives other than feeling that all is lost, sort of. (Andy)
Yeah, but some form of frustration comes out of this game situation, that they, they sort of feel… “Our group here,
we’re not getting anywhere with this,” and then, but I always round off this kind of exercise with some form of
discussion where I try to establish concretely “what have we now achieved?” What does this reflect, does it reflect
a situation in the world…Yeah, how did you experience this situation of maybe not achieving what you wanted,
what made the situation turn out in this way? (Hugo)
Yes, talk about it, what they’re worried about, what do you think the reason is, what can we do about it? “Don’t you
think that somebody’s doing something about this?” and “I know that this is how it is and that people are doing
research about it” or…(Victoria)
Finally, there exists a seed to a very uncommon theme related to (4) flexibility and adjustment to the
situation when dealing with emotional reactions in the classroom. It consists of an active adjustment to

THE JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION 9
the situation and students when it comes to dealing with emotions in the climate-change classroom. The
core of this theme is that you cannot say how you react when emotions are present in the classroom since
you need to be flexible and sensitive to the specific situation and the specific students involved. Each
situation is unique and requires its own blend of disparate approaches.
What do you guys do then? (Interviewer) Well, that’s depends entirely on the situation, so you can’t say what you
would normally do, you have to take people as individuals. (Linda)
So the students, like, their outlook on climate change can vary a lot, so you have to strike a balance there somehow.
(Christina)
Discussion
This study took its starting point in theories about teacher’s beliefs and meta-emotion philosophies in
order to explore senior high-school teachers’ views and beliefs about students’ emotions when educating
about climate change and how they perceive they deal with, and coach, these emotional reactions. The
analysis revealed four overarching themes regarding beliefs about emotions, which is one important part
of the meta-emotion philosophy concept: Some teachers disapprove of emotions in the classroom, fore-
most negative emotions, and see them as irrational. Some have a danger-oriented view of negative
emotions, where emotions such as worry and hopelessness are seen as rational, i.e., based on a correct
view of reality, but as dangerous for the learning process and young people’s wellbeing. It is also common
to perceive hope in a very positive manner. Others have a partially acceptance-based view of negative
emotions where worry-related emotions are perceived as in theme two, but negative emotions of anger,
irritation, and frustration are looked upon as positive for the learning process. Finally, a highly uncom-
mon theme concerns a complexity-based view of emotions in the learning process. In addition, four
different overarching ways of dealing with emotions, another vital aspect of the meta-emotion philosophy
concept, were identified: avoiding negative emotional reactions, action-based and reappraisal-based
coaching, strategies to approach negative emotions, and an uncommon flexibility and adjustment coach-
ing strategy.
The reason that teachers’ beliefs and views about emotions in the climate-change learning process are
important to explore is that research in other education subfields indicates that they can most probably
influence how teachers deal with emotions in the learning process, creating an overarching meta-emotion
philosophy (Ciucci et al., 2018; Ornaghi et al., 2020). There were some indication in the material that
certain ways of perceiving emotions in the learning process were related to how the teachers said they
dealt with emotional reactions in the classroom, the most obvious being that the teachers who embraced
a disapproving view of emotions also used coaching strategies where they avoided emotions in the class-
room to a larger extent. However, the material is too small to establish any conclusive results regarding
this aspect. This need to be further investigated in studies with larger samples, for instance, through
cluster analysis in quantitative studies. Nonetheless, the present study contributes interesting results to
build such a study on.
Some specific results are interesting to discuss in more detail. A quite common coaching strategy
among the teachers is to quickly turn from negative emotions of worry and hopelessness to instead
promote hope and other positive emotions among the students. At first glance, this can be perceived as
a rather unproblematic approach; few people would like to promote hopelessness in young people.
However, psychological research about emotion coaching and emotion regulation shows that it is import-
ant to not shy away from the negative emotions, but to rather show that these are OK, that you respect
them, and that you take the young person seriously (see Ciucci et al., 2015; Fivush, 2007; Fivush et al.,
2009; Gottman et al., 1997; Habermas, 2019). Another important thing in this regard is to help young
people put words on their worries so that they get a sense of control over it and that they get a sense of
the problem so they can deal with it in an active way. Furthermore, young people are experts in revealing
when adults gloss over things, as is demonstrated in the famous statement by Greta Thunberg about that
“we don’t want your hope.” Shallow hope risks leading to an increase in young people’s cynical view of

10 M. OJALA
the adult world in relation to climate change; a view that is quite common among young people (see
Ojala, 2010).
In addition, concerning worry about societal problems, it is somewhat problematic to try to assuage
feelings of worry without facing the problems and values related to this worry. This can be seen as a way
to sweep the societal problems that cause the unrest under the rug, thereby rendering societal change
harder to achieve (see Bauman & Donskis, 2013). If we want to create the conditions for both psycho-
logical wellbeing and active social engagement among young people, it could be argued that it is rather
important to show students how to face their worries, learn something from this emotion, and finally
use it for constructive action. An important first step in doing this is to acknowledge worry and other
negative emotions, to help young people put word on this feeling, and to have them discuss this feeling
before going into what one can do about the problem causing the emotion (Ojala, 2019).
Malin Ideland also argues that focusing on positive emotions and hope only, as a number of teachers
do in this study, can lead to some young people being excluded from ESD, namely, those who have the
wrong spirit and feel the wrong emotions (Ideland, 2016). Often worry and other darker emotions are
seen as the opposite of hope. However, empirical research has shown that this view is not correct, since
young people can be both worried and hopeful at the same time (Ojala, 2007). In addition, theoreticians
such as Bloch and Freire perceived critical hope as rooted in an acknowledgment and a critical under-
standing of the current situation (Freire, 1992; see also Levitas, 1990). This understanding makes people
start to hope for something else, which, together with a view of the future as open and “Not-Yet,” can
energize active engagement.
Perhaps the most common way among the teachers to react to emotions was to focus on what the
students can do at an individual level. Psychological research shows that one of the best ways to turn
negative emotions of fear and worry into a constructive force and prevent a low sense of wellbeing is to
show how you can deal with the problem causing the emotion (Eisenberg et al., 1998; Maloney et al.,
2011; Witte & Allen, 2000). However, to only deal with climate change emotions in an individualized
problem-focused way has been found to be related to low psychological wellbeing among young people
(for a review see Ojala, 2019). You cannot solve climate change on your own, and dealing in a prob-
lem-focused way with stressors that are more or less out of your control can lead to increased distress
(see Clarke, 2006; Hallis & Slone, 1999). In addition, it is important to trust other actors in society, such
as politicians and technological development (Ojala, 2015). Fortunately, the teachers also quite commonly
use a strategy where they show the students things that other actors do and point at progress. One can
also speculate that teachers today, after the starting of the Fridays for Future movement, perhaps show
students how they can act at a collective level also, something that can increase feelings of wellbeing.
This, however, remains to be find out in future studies.
It is also interesting to notice that some teachers’ meta-emotion philosophies include perceiving
emotions as more or less irrational and as something that has no place in learning about climate change.
This seems to be a somewhat outdated view of emotions, since basic research in the broader emotion
field shows that emotions sometimes are a necessary foundation for practical decision-making (Damasio,
1994; Roeser & Pesch, 2016). Still, in the popular media debate emotions quite often are seen as the causes
behind believing in alternative facts and leading to fact resistance, which of course also can influence
teachers’ views.
It is also interesting that most of the teachers do not see worry as a positive force in the learning
process, but instead foremost relate it to hopelessness, inactivity and even low wellbeing, while some
teachers mention anger as something that is positive for both learning and active engagement and as an
emotion that they actively use and sometimes even promote in the classroom. This dichotomy, where
some emotions are seen as bad and some as good, can be problematic from a gender perspective. Studies
show that girls/women are more inclined to express worry about different things than boys/men
(Barahmand, 2008; Ekholm, 2019; Robichaud et al., 2003), while the opposite often is true for anger
(McDuff et al., 2017). Research also indicates that women’s worries are seen as signs of a low sense of
wellbeing and passivity more often than if men express this emotion (see Conway et al., 2003). However,
concerning global environmental problems, worry has constantly been found to be positively associated
with engagement and high self-efficacy (Briscoe et al., 2019; Hornsey & Fielding, 2016; Ogunbode et al.,

THE JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION 11
2019; Ojala, 2007; Taber & Taylor, 2009) and it is not necessarily tantamount to low wellbeing (see
Ojala, 2007).
The results of this study have practical implications for teacher education. Theoretically, meta-emotion
philosophies are more or less implicit and habitual, and one can argue that critical emotional awareness
is important in order for educators to respond professionally to emotions in ESD (Ojala, 2019). By con-
cretely pinpointing different meta-emotion philosophies, this study, and other similar studies, can work
as a starting point for lifting these dimensions to the surface, and could be a base for critically discussing
different views of emotions, preferably in relation to scientific theories and studies about emotions.
Notes
1. Hermans (2016) looked at how teachers themselves cope with their own emotion regarding climate change.
2. These were the most common emotions in relation to climate change mentioned by the teachers in the
interviews performed for this study. The teachers, however, also touched upon interest and disinterest as
common responses among the students. Since these are more general states of educational feeling, not
specifically related to sustainability issues, they fall outside the focus of this study and are not analyzed.
3. The names of the respondents have been made up by the author.
4. The interviews were conducted before the Friday’s for Future movement started.
Funding
This work was supported by the Swedish research Council Formas under Grant 2010-1152 to the author.
References
Ahmed, S. (2010). The promise of happiness. Duke University Press.
Amsler, S. (2015). The education of radical democracy. Routledge.
Ashiabi, G. S. (2000). Promoting the emotional development of preschoolers. Early Childhood Education Journal, 28(2),
79–84. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009543203089
Barahmand, U. (2008). Age and gender differences in adolescent worry. Personality and Individual Differences, 45(8),
778–783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.08.006
Bauman, Z., & Donskis, L. (2013). Moral blindness. The loss of sensitivity in liquid modernity. Polity Press.
Biesta, G., Priestley, M., & Robinson, S. (2015). The role of beliefs in teacher agency. Teachers and Teaching, 21(6),
624–640. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2015.1044325
Boler, M. (1999). Feeling power: Education and the emotions. Routledge.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/
10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Briscoe, M. D., Givens, J. E., Olson Hazboun, S., & Krannich, R. S. (2019). At home, in public, and in between: Gender
differences in public, private and transportation pro-environmental behaviors in the US Intermountain West.
Environmental Sociology, 5(4), 374–392. https://doi.org/10.1080/23251042.2019.1628333
Calderhead, J. (1996). Teachers: Beliefs and knowledge. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational
psychology (pp. 709–725). Prentice Hall International.
Carmi, N., Arnon, S., & Orion, N. (2015). Transforming environmental knowledge into behavior: The mediating role of
environmental emotions. The Journal of Environmental Education, 46(3), 183–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2
015.1028517
Ciucci, E., Baroncelli, A., & Toselli, M. (2015). Meta-emotion philosophy in early childhood teachers: Psychometric
properties of the Crèche Educator Emotional Styles Questionnaire. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 33, 1–11.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2015.04.006
Ciucci, E., Baroncelli, A., Toselli, M., & Denham, S. A. (2018). Personal and professional emotional characteristics of
early childhood teachers and their proneness to communicate with parents and colleagues about children’s emotions.
Child & Youth Care Forum, 47(2), 303–316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10566-017-9431-0
Clarke, A. T. (2006). Coping with interpersonal stress and psychosocial health among children and adolescents: A meta
analysis. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 35(1), 10–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-005-9001-x
Conway, M., Wood, W.-J., Dugas, M., & Pushkar, D. (2003). Are women perceived as engaging in more maladaptive
worry than men? A status interpretation. Sex Roles, 49(1/2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023901417591
Cross, R. (1998). Teachers’ views about what to do about sustainable development. Environmental Education Research,
4(1), 41–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350462980040103
Damasio, A. R. (1994). Descartes’ error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. G.P. Putnam.

12 M. OJALA
Davies, B., & Bansel, P. (2007). Neoliberalism and education. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education,
20(3), 247–259. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518390701281751
Drever, E. (1995). Using semi-structured interviews in small-scale research. A teacher’s guide. University of Glasgow.
Ecclestone, K., & Hayes, D. (2008). The dangerous rise of therapeutic education. Routledge.
Eisenberg, N., Cumberland, A., & Spinrad, T. L. (1998). Parental socialization of emotion. Psychological Inquiry, 9(4),
241–273. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli0904_1
Ekholm, S. (2019). Swedish mothers’ and fathers’ worries about climate change: A gendered story. Journal of Risk Research.
23(3), 288–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2019.1569091
Fivush, R. (2007). Maternal reminiscing style and children’s developing understanding of self and emotion. Clinical Social
Work Journal, 35(1), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-006-0065-1
Fivush, R., Marin, K., McWilliams, K., & Bohanek, J. G. (2009). Family reminiscing style: Parent gender and emotional
focus in relation to child well-being. Journal of Cognition and Development, 10(3), 210–235. https://doi.
org/10.1080/15248370903155866
Freire, P. (1992). Pedagogy of hope. The Continuum Publishing Company.
Gardiner, S., & Rieckmann, M. (2015). Pedagogies of preparedness: Use of reflective journals in the operationalisation
and development of anticipatory competence. Sustainability, 7(8), 10554–10575.
Gottman, J. M., Katz, L. F., & Hooven, C. (1997). Meta-emotion: How families communicate emotionally. Lawrence
Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Habermas, T. (2019). Emotion and narrative: Perspectives in autobiographical storytelling. Cambridge University Press.
Håkansson, M., & Östman, L. (2019). The political dimension in ESE: The construction of a political moment model for
analyzing bodily anchored political emotions in teaching and learning of the political dimension. Environmental
Education Research, 25(4), 585–600. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2017.1422113
Hallis, D., & Slone, M. (1999). Coping strategies and locus of control as mediating variables in the relation between ex-
posure to political life events and psychological adjustment in Israeli children. International Journal of Stress
Management, 6(2), 105–123. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022980310481
Hermans, M. (2016). Geography teachers and climate change: Emotions about consequences, coping strategies, and views
on mitigation. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(4), 389–408.
Hicks, D. (2014). Educating for hope in trubbeled times. Climate change and the transition to a post-carbon future. Trentham
Books.
Hornsey, M. J., & Fielding, K. S. (2016). A cautionary note about messages of hope: Focusing on progress in reducing
carbon emissions weakens mitigation motivation. Global Environmental Change, 39, 26–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
gloenvcha.2016.04.003
Ideland, M. (2016). The action competent child: Responsibilization through practices and emotions in environmental
education. Knowledge Cultures, 4(2), 95–112.
Jie Li, C., & Monroe, M. C. (2019). Exploring the essential psychological factors in fostering hope concerning climate
change. Environmental Education Research, 25(6), 936–954. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2017.1367916
Katz, L. F., Maliken, A. C., & Stettler, N. M. (2012). Parental meta-emotion philosophy: A review of research and theo-
retical framework. Child Development Perspectives, 6(4), 417–422. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-8606.2012.00244.x
Kerret, D., Orkibi, H., & Ronen, T. (2016). Testing a model linking environmental hope and self-control with students’
positive emotions and environmental behavior. The Journal of Environmental Education, 47(4), 307–317. https://doi.org/
10.1080/00958964.2016.1182886
Levitas, R. (1990). Educated hope: Ernst Bloch on abstract and concrete Utopia. Utopian Studies, 1(2), 13–26.
Lundegård, I., & Wickman, P.-O. (2007). Conflicts of interest: An indispensable element of education for sustainable
development. Environmental Education Research, 13(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620601122566
Maloney, E. K., Lapinski, M. K., & Witte, K. (2011). Fear appeals and persuasion: A review and update of the ex-
tended parallel process model. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5(4), 206–219. https://doi.org/
10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00341.x
Manni, A., Sporre, K., & Ottander, C. (2017). Emotions and values – A case study of meaning-making in ESE.
Environmental Education Research, 23(4), 451–464. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2016.1175549
McDuff, D., Kodra, E., Kaliouby, R., & LaFrance, M. (2017). A large-scale analysis of sex differences in facial expressions.
PLoS One, 12(4), e0173942. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173942
Ming Yan, W. (2010). The relations between teacher’s meta-emotion, student’s bonding to school and academic performance
[Masters thesis in Educational Psychology]. Department of Psychology, The University of Hong Kong.
Molin, L., Grubbström, A., Bladh, G., & Westermark, Å. (2015). Do personal experiences have an impact on teaching
and didactic choices in Geography?European Journal of Geography, 6(4), 6–20.
Nespor, J. (1987). The role of beliefs in the practice of teaching. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 19(4), 317–328. https://doi.
org/10.1080/0022027870190403
Ogunbode, C. A., Böhm, G., Capstick, S. B., Demski, C., Spence, A., & Tausch, N. (2019). The resilience paradox:
Flooding experience, coping and climate change mitigation intentions. Climate Policy, 19(6), 703–715. https://doi.org/
10.1080/14693062.2018.1560242.
Ojala, M. (2007). Hope and worry: Exploring young people’s values, emotions, and behavior regarding global environmental
problems. Örebro Studies in Psychology 11. Örebro University. Doctoral dissertation.
Ojala, M. (2010). Barns känslor och tankar om klimatproblematiken. Energimyndighetens rapportserie. ER 2010:31.

THE JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION 13
Ojala, M. (2015). Hope in the face of climate change: Associations with environmental engagement and student percep-
tions of teachers’ emotion communication style and future orientation. The Journal of Environmental Education, 46(3),
133–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2015.1021662
Ojala, M. (2019). Känslor, värden och utbildning för en hållbar framtid: Att främja en kritisk känslokompetens i klima-
tundervisning. Acta Didactica Norge, 13(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.5617/adno.6440
Ornaghi, V., Agliati, A., Pepe, A., & Gabola, P. (2020). Patterns of association between early childhood teachers’ emotion
socialization styles, emotion beliefs and mind-mindedness. Early Education and Development, 31(1), 47–65. https://
doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2019.1627805
Pajares, F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Clearing up a messy construct. Review of Educational
Research, 62(3), 307–332.
Patton, M. Q. (2001). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Sage.
Pessoa, L. (2008). On the relationship between emotion and cognition. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience, 9(2), 148–158.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2317
Phelps, E. A. (2006). Emotion and cognition: Insights from studies of the human amygdala. Annual Review of Psychology,
57(1), 27–53. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070234
Robichaud, M., Dugas, M. J., & Conway, M. (2003). Gender differences in worry and associated cognitive-behavioral
variables. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 17(5), 501–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0887-6185(02)00237-2
Roeser, S., & Pesch, U. (2016). An emotional deliberation approach to risk. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 41(2),
274–297. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243915596231
Skolverket. (2011). Läroplan, examensmål och gymnasiegemensamma ämnen för gymnasieskola 2011. Retrieved May 23,
2020, from https://www.skolverket.se/undervisning/gymnasieskolan/laroplan-program-och-amnen-i-gymnasiesko-
lan/laroplan-gy11-for-gymnasieskolan
Smith, J. A., & Osborn, M. (2003). Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In J. A. Smith (Ed.), Qualitative psychology.
A practical guide to research methods (pp. 51–80). Sage.
Stevenson, K., & Peterson, P. (2015). Motivating action through fostering climate change hope and concern and avoiding
despair among adolescents. Sustainability, 8(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8010006
Sund, L., & Öhman, J. (2014). On the need to repoliticise environmental and sustainability education: Rethinking the
post-political consensus. Environmental Education Research, 20(5), 639–659. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2013.
833585
Sund, P. (2008). Discerning selective traditions in the socialization content of environmental education—Implications for
education for sustainable development [School of Sustainable Development of Society and Technology. Eskilstuna,
Mälardalen University. Doctoral thesis]. Mälardalen University Press.
Sund, P., & Wickman, P.-O. (2011a). Socialization content in schools and education for sustainable development—I. A
study of teachers’ selective traditions. Environmental Education Research, 17(5), 599–624. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350
4622.2011.572156
Taber, F., & Taylor, N. (2009). Climate of concern—A search for effective strategies for teaching children about global
warming. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 4(2), 97–116.
Thompson, P., & Zizek, S. (Eds.). (2013). The privatization of hope: Ernst Bloch and the future of utopia. Duke University
Press.
UN. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for sustainable development. United Nations General Assembly.
Wals, A. E. J. (2007). Learning in a changing world and changing in a learning world: Reflexively fumbling towards sus-
tainability. Southern African Journal of Environmental Education, 22, 35–45.
Witte, K., & Allen, M. (2000). A meta-analysis of fear appeals: Implications for effective public health campaigns. Health
Education & Behavior, 27(5), 591–615. https://doi.org/10.1177/109019810002700506
Zembylas, M. (2004). Emotion metaphors and emotional labor in science teaching. Science Education, 88(3), 301–324.
https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10116
Zembylas, M., Charalambous, C., & Charalambous, P. (2014). The schooling of emotion and memory: Analyzing emo-
tional styles in the context of a teacher’s pedagogical practices. Teaching and Teacher Education, 44, 69–80. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.08.001