Chapter

Le mode de vie Européen dans l'ombre de la covid-19: Perspectives Hongroises

Authors:
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the authors.

Abstract

Have we ever considered living our lives relatively simultaneously in all parts of Europe? We start and end our days roughly at the same time, as there is only a three-hour time lag between the westernmost and easternmost points of Europe. Do we have anything else in common in our everyday lives? Is there a common European way of life? If so, what exactly does that mean? What does Europeanness mean? Does it have a common content, a concept that can be called uniform? What does the term European identity mean? Is it the same as the European way of life? Our study revolves around the topic of European identity, European values, and lifestyles, which was presented in the “Promoting our way of Life” portfolio in December 2019 by Ursu-la von der Leyen, President of the European Commission. Vice-President Margaritis Schinas is responsible for the portfolio, together with other four key policies. Our study presents the concept and implementation of the European way of life in the shadow of the fight against the new type of coronavirus that arrived in Europe at the dawn of 2020, including Member States’ restrictive measures affecting our ways of life. The European Union is unique among international organisations: it can be seen as a sui gen-eris entity rather than a classical international organisation. Its uniqueness is that it forms a unit from the outside, but an extremely heterogeneous community from the inside. From the inside, we perceive and amplify the differences between nations much better for the EU than we do for our similarities. If we were to ask a person from a third country, it is unlikely that he would mention the sharp differences between individual European nations. The foundation of our unity is based in part on our common historical traditions, in part on the millennial uni-fying role and determinant of the Christian religion, and in part on respect for democracy. The political position between states has never been genuinely unified. The differing views were organically related to the form and extent of cooperation and the states involved. Pro-posals have also been made several times to move towards a federal Europe, but there has never been a political-social consensus for that concept. Regarding the degree of cooperation, there are many examples of differentiated integration in certain areas. It is no coincidence that the concepts related to two- or multi-speed Europe − which have been present in reality for more than thirty years, − have also entered the political-legal-social public consciousness. Just as there was no uniform vision of the degree of cooperation in European integration, so we can name only mandatory and additional conceptual elements regarding Europeanness and European identity. In the following, we present the concepts of European identity and a common European way of life.

No full-text available

Request Full-text Paper PDF

To read the full-text of this research,
you can request a copy directly from the authors.

... The currently emerging public health crisis posed by COVID-19 is a significant example of these restrictions. [1] The creation of EU citizenship can be seen as one of the generators of a shared sense of identity, in the process of defining, promoting, and protecting the European way of life. What is a common European identity? ...
Article
Full-text available
https://www.constitutionaldiscourse.com/post/lilla-n%C3%B3ra-kiss-orsolya-johanna-sziebig-european-way-of-life
Article
Full-text available
The phenomenon of geo-blocking is one of the new challenges of the digital era. Geo-blocking is a modern form of discrimination that differentiates between consumers on the basis of their geographical location. The phenomenon ultimately affects the situation of the citizen concerned and may also constitute an obstacle to the single market. Digital time has put a number of issues to be resolved on the legislator’s table in recent years, one of which is the phenomenon of geo-blocking. Already in 2015, the European Commission led by Juncker (2014–2019) adopted the Digital Single Market (DSM) strategy, which marked the European Union’s (EU) path towards innovation by creating a new digital dimension of the Single Market. In order to achieve the DSM strategy and the digital objectives, a number of legislative acts have been put in place to address the elements of the DSM and exploit the benefits of technological modernisation. The geo-blocking phenomenon is presented in this study, partly in terms of practical aspects and partly with regard to the geo-blocking regulation. The Ursula von der Leyen-led Commission (2019–2024) identifies “a Europe fit for the digital age” among its six priorities. Among the priorities, the “promotion of a European way of life”, must be linked to the digital priorities, as our smart tools and our digital presence are becoming an integral part of our lives – and our common way of life – especially at this time of the COVID-19 pandemic. Innovation has also been accelerated by the current exceptional situation, the health emergency caused by COVID-19, forcing us to work remotely, remote contacts and the constant use of our smart tools. The realisation of digital well-being is therefore also an integral part of our lifestyle. In the intersection of digitalisation and development and the promotion of a common European way of life, we can find a single market in which we can experience a significant aspect of our European way of life – the free movements and cross-border transactions – even through our online presence. The internal market is the dimension for the proper functioning of which the Union institutions can adopt a legislative act. In addition, measures taken to remove barriers and remove obstacles are essential for the functioning of the internal market. Joint action against geo-blocking as an internal market barrier will also play a role in creating digital prosperity by promoting the proper functioning of the internal market by promoting e-commerce and electronic content access. The aim of the study on the one hand is to present issues related to geo-blocking in a brief and descriptive manner from the perspective of the social, economic and legal environment linked to the internal market. On the other hand, the study briefly presents the legal environment of geo-blocking in the USA, Russia, China and Japan.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any references for this publication.