ChapterPDF Available

Ethnic Poverty: Causes, Implications, and Solutions

Authors:

Abstract

Poverty manifests itself in various forms, including a lack of income and productive resources to ensure sustainable livelihoods, hunger and malnutrition, ill-health, increased morbidity and mortality from illness, limits on or lack of access to education and other basic services, homelessness and inadequate housing, unsafe environments and social discrimination and exclusion. It is also characterised by a lack of participation in decision making and in civil, social, and cultural life. An ethnic group is a social group that shares a common and distinctive history, culture, religion, language, or the like. Ethnic poverty occurs when there is systemic poverty for an ethnic group.
E
Ethnic Poverty: Causes,
Implications, and Solutions
Tolulope Olarewaju
1
and Temitayo Olarewaju
2
1
Staffordshire Business School, Staffordshire
University, Stoke-on-Trent, UK
2
Peter A. Allard School of Law, The University of
British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
Synonyms
Ethnic inequality;Ethnic minorities;Poverty
reduction
Definitions
Poverty manifests itself in various forms, includ-
ing a lack of income and productive resources to
ensure sustainable livelihoods, hunger and mal-
nutrition, ill health, increased morbidity and mor-
tality from illness, limits on or lack of access to
education and other basic services, homelessness
and inadequate housing, unsafe environments,
and social discrimination and exclusion. It is
also characterized by a lack of participation in
decision-making and in civil, social, and cultural
life. An ethnic group is a social group that shares a
common and distinctive history, culture, religion,
language, or the like. Ethnic poverty occurs when
there is systemic poverty for an ethnic group.
Introduction
Poverty is a multidimensional phenomenon that
goes beyond a lack of income and material
resources (Revenga et al. 2002;UN2018). Its
manifestations include hunger and malnutrition,
limited access to education and other basic ser-
vices, social discrimination and exclusion, as well
as a lack of participation in decision-making
(UN 2019). Ethnicity as a concept is deeply
related to the general practice of alienation and
of identity branding characterizing both intra-
global and intra-national relations (Brand et al.
1974). In many of these relations, opportunities,
rights, and privileges are functions of who one is
and where one is from (Odeyemi 2014).
In the modern era, the world has witnessed an
unprecedented integration of peoples, customs,
traditions, and businesses, and the supposedly
boundless economic opportunities offered by
globalization (Meyer and Peng 2016). Globaliza-
tion was believed to be capable of narrowing or
collapsing various forms of primordial identity
that had thrived on the linkage of factors such as
racial, tribal, cultural, linguistic, and religious dif-
ferences (Odeyemi 2014). A related goal of glob-
alization was to spur a new wave of economic
growth and create opportunities for all peoples to
partake in, irrespective of ethnicity. Unfortu-
nately, there are strong links between poverty
and ethnicity in many countries around the
world (Agostini et al. 2010; Churchill and Smyth
2017), and research shows that it is the unequal
© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020
W. Leal Filho et al. (eds.), No Poverty, Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69625-6_124-1
concentration of wealth across ethnic lines that is
detrimental rather than diversity per se (Alesina
et al. 2016).
To attain Goal 1 of the UN Sustainable Devel-
opment Goals (SDGs) and end poverty in all
forms everywhere (UN 2018), ethnic poverty
will need to be addressed. This entry synthesizes
the research on ethnic poverty in developing and
developed countries and provides suggestions on
how the phenomenon can be tackled.
Ethnic Poverty in Developing Countries
Developing nations with diverse ethnic groups
usually report higher poverty rates (Bidgman
2008). While it is often also useful to measure
non-material dimensions of poverty (Revenga
et al. 2002), extreme poverty is measured as living
on less than US$1.90 a day (UN 2018). The
extremely poor are more likely to be found in
developing countries and research shows that
extreme poverty exists along ethnic lines in such
contexts (Churchill and Smyth 2017; Olarewaju
2016).
In Sub-Saharan Africa, research shows that
ethnic diversity has often meant that the ethnic
groups in power are incentivized to distribute
resources to themselves at the expense of national
growth (Braathen et al. 2000; Mickiewicz and
Olarewaju 2020), making inter-ethnic group
action, such as addressing poverty, difcult and
increasing the probability of violent conicts
(Collier 2007; Elu and Loubert 2013). Gradín
(2016) used an index of wealth to measure the
economic status of households in Asia and
showed that the poverty gap between ethnic
groups was astonishingly large. In some cases,
the differential in poverty rates was above 60 per-
centage points. This was especially true in the case
of Siraikiand other linguistic groups in
Pakistan, scheduled tribes in India, or Hill
Dalitin Nepal. In Vietnam, the ethnic majority
populations of Vietand Hoawere relatively
well off compared to other minority populations
(Imai et al. 2011). However, not even upper-mid-
dle-income countries are exempt from ethnic pov-
erty as in Bulgaria and Romania, poverty seems
prevalent among the Romain comparison to
other ethnic groups (Revenga et al. 2002).
Some ethnic groups usually accumulate a num-
ber of disadvantages across different dimensions,
such as having lower education, higher unem-
ployment, larger families, a higher concentration
in rural areas, or lower development of their com-
munities, that help to explain their higher poverty
rates (Sullivan and Ziegert 2008; Gradín 2016).
For example, socioeconomic factors usually lie at
the root of the higher poverty rates reported for
disadvantaged ethnic groups in India and Nepal,
while location factors lie at the root of ethnic
poverty in the Philippines (Gradín 2016).
A constellation of impediments disadvantage eth-
nic minorities and lead to ethnic poverty in devel-
oping countries.
Historical Antecedents and Conflicts
In this era of cultural pluralism, ethnicity and
nationalism have been the basis of politics in
many nations (Davis and Kalu-Nwiwu 2001;
Michalopoulos and Papaioannou 2016). Devotion
to one ethnic group over another, a term often
referred to as tribalism,has been one of the
most denitive causes of social crisis, injustice,
inequality, and religiopolitical instability, espe-
cially in developing countries (Davis and Kalu-
Nwiwu 2001; Záhořík 2011). Such ethnic biases
and the resulting activities have also been per-
ceived as a major obstacle to overall politico-
economic development. Remarkably, almost all
of the countries in South Asia and Sub-Saharan
Africa, the two regions that together account for
85% (629 million) of the worlds poor (UN 2019),
were carved up into colonial territories by
Europeans without regard to ethnic boundaries
and without due consideration for their idiosyn-
cratic compatibility (Braathen et al. 2000;
Odeyemi 2014). Pre-colonial and post-colonial
caste categorization and persecution also continue
to inuence access to economic opportunities in
many of these countries, with lower-ranked
castes and ethnic groups largely remaining in
poverty (Levien 2018).
Correlated with historical antecedents, ethni-
cally related wars and genocides have also
reduced the pace of achieving the SDGs,
2 Ethnic Poverty: Causes, Implications, and Solutions
particularly SDG 1. Rather than diminishing eth-
nic biases, modernization and other economic and
technical advances have provided new issues that
fuel ethnic biases within many societies, where
they have remained a major and recurrent
devourer of human lives and potential (Odeyemi
2014). Protracted conicts over the rights and
demands of ethnic or religious groups have caused
more misery and human loss of life than have any
other types of local, regional, and international
conict since the end of World War II (Harff
2018). Related to this, Braathen et al. (2000)
argue that conicts labeled as ethnic or tribal
usually have underlying sets of complex interac-
tive causes.
Unequal Access to Education and
Infrastructure
Strong links exist between the lack of education
and poverty (Brown and Park 2002; Olarewaju
et al. 2019). South American research shows that
low levels of education and uency in English
contribute to high Hispanic poverty rates and are
also contributing factors to differences in poverty
among Hispanic ethnic groups (Sullivan and
Ziegert 2008). In Africa, the colonial govern-
mentspreferential treatment of various ethnic
groups often resulted in the preferred ethnic
groupseducational ascendancy over the other
groups. For example, in Kenya, the low educa-
tional attainment of minority groups can be traced
to the past patron-client relationship between the
preferred ethnic groups and colonial govern-
ments, a trend which has continued after the colo-
nial era (Schech and Alwy 2004).
Moreover, compared to the ethnic groups com-
prising the majority of the population, minority
ethnic groups in developing countries usually
have access to poorer infrastructure (Suryadarma
et al. 2006). Such subpar infrastructure may hin-
der economic performance for the ethnic group
with lesser access (Baulch et al. 2010). Ethnic
disparities in access to healthcare have also been
reported in post-apartheid South Africa (Kon and
Lackan 2008), but the infrastructure need not
always be tangible. For example, research shows
that in Vietnam, minority ethnic groups were
unable to obtain positive educational benets
because of language barriers when the language
of instruction was that of the majority ethnic
group (Baulch et al. 2010; Cuong et al. 2015).
Disproportionate Employment and Pay
Disparities
The low educational attainment of ethnic minority
groups often has a knock-on effect on employ-
ment and pay potential. The Roma,for exam-
ple, fare poorly in the labor market compared to
other populations in the countries that they reside.
This is largely due to low educational attainments
and skill levels (Revenga et al. 2002). However, it
is often somewhat unclear if the employment and
pay disparities that exist along ethnic lines are as a
result of negative stereotypes (Ruhlandt et al.
2020). Research from Asia also shows that ethnic
minorities often earn less than the dominant ethnic
group (Kabeer 2006), and similar results have
been found in Africa (Olarewaju 2018).
This dimension is complicated because, in
many developing countries, ethnicity appears to
inuence access to choice of location and infra-
structural facilities, which in turn determine
access to and use of productive resources that
impact economic opportunities and income
(Engvall 2007). For example, research from
Vietnam shows that wealthy communes, where
the dominant ethnic groups reside, have greater
access to employment opportunities because of
their superior access to transport infrastructure
and factories (Imai et al. 2011). In Africa, parallel
advantages arise from ethnic groupsclose loca-
tion to colonial commerce centers, and these
advantages soon result in material distinctions
(Schech and Alwy 2004).
Solutions to Ethnic Poverty in Developing
Countries
Recent research on ethnic minority development
and poverty reduction in Vietnam stresses the
need for nuanced and targeted policies, programs,
and projects that address the specic needs of
targeted ethnic communities (Kozel 2014). Rather
than a standardized national approach to poverty
reduction that may have been appropriate in the
past, current recommendations favor taking a pro-
vincial or regional focus with components aimed
Ethnic Poverty: Causes, Implications, and Solutions 3
at disadvantaged groups in the population, such as
youth, migrants, older women, or members of one
or more particular ethnicity. Activities should be
based on the evidence of success in one ethnic
minority area or more, and some of the possible
approaches to consider for future initiatives that
reduce ethnic poverty in developing countries
include the following:
1. Offering business training for ethnic minorities
2. Expanding vocational training for ethnic
minority youth, with an emphasis on skills
with an identied local market in the agricul-
ture and non-agriculture sectors
3. Providing credit, agricultural extension train-
ing, and market information to formal and
informal farmersgroups, on a demand basis,
that responds to locally identied ethnic minor-
ity needs
4. Scaling up bilingual education in larger ethnic
minority languages
5. Offering incentives for responsible industrial
development and local enterprise investment in
ethnic minority areas, providing diversied
employment options without the social costs
of migration
6. Recruiting and developing the capacity of
leaders from local ethnic groups in both formal
governance structures such as commune and
district peoples committees and traditional vil-
lage leaders
7. Involving local and international non-
governmental organizations to a greater extent
in cooperation with the government and the
private sector, such as through provincial inno-
vation funds for local social projects
Gradín (2016) reported that in the specic case
of the scheduled tribes in India, their higher con-
centration in rural areas and their poorer perfor-
mance in the labor market were remarkable
determinant factors of their ethnic poverty. On
the contrary, the Philippines was outstanding for
having regional wealth inequalities as the main
factor associated with most of the ethnic poverty
gap of their disadvantaged ethnicities. The authors
also showed that in a period of generally strong
economic growth, the wealth of all ethnic groups
in India and the Philippines increased. Thus, to
tackle ethnic poverty in developing countries,
strategies and policies that lift the whole popula-
tion out of poverty via general economic growth
should be encouraged (Fox et al. 2015;UN2019).
These should be complemented with targeted pol-
icies that meet the educational, employment, loca-
tional, and infrastructural needs of ethnic minority
groups so as to create better employment and pay
outcomes (Churchill and Smyth 2017; Cuong
et al. 2015). Caste-based differences and preju-
dices must also be eliminated (Levien 2018).
Lessons can also be learnt for the rst devel-
oping country to achieve the rst Millennium
Development Goal of halving poverty; China
(WorldBankGroup 2020). Although the Chinese
government has been accused of ethnic discrimi-
nation particularly in its re-education camps and
there is substantial poverty among ethnic minori-
ties in rural China (Brown and Park 2002;
Gustafsson and Sai 2009), between 1990 and
2011, China lifted 439 million poor people out
of poverty including many ethnic groups, contrib-
uting signicantly to global poverty reduction.
With a continuous increase in grain production
for 11 years since 2004, China has been able to
feed nearly 20% of the worlds population with
less than 10% of the worlds cultivated land
(WorldBankGroup 2020). Chinas experience in
poverty alleviation entails the following (Liu et al.
2017; WorldBankGroup 2020):
1. Continuous reform and innovation to sustain
economic growth with policies favoring poor
regions and poor people
2. Integrating poverty alleviation into the national
development strategy and organizing large-
scale poverty alleviation programs with
targeted programs for women, children, dis-
abled people, and ethnic minorities
3. Adopting a development-oriented poverty alle-
viation approach that focuses on development
as the fundamental way to get out of poverty
and building poor peoples capacity to help
themselves
4. Pursuing a strategy of balanced urban and rural
economic-social development, getting industry
to support agriculture and cities to support rural
areas.
4 Ethnic Poverty: Causes, Implications, and Solutions
5. Developing infrastructure, including roads,
water and sanitation, electrication, natural
gas supply, and housing
6. Mobilizing all resources for poverty reduction,
including both public and private sectors.
7. Integrating general and special favorable poli-
cies, development-oriented poverty allevia-
tion, and social safety nets
Ethnic conicts in many developing countries
have also reduced the pace of achieving SDG
1 (Odeyemi 2014). Irobi (2005) propounded that
ethnic conicts have been at the heart of the
development problems in Nigeria and South-
Africa, two of the largest economies in Sub-
Saharan Africa. Politicized ethnicity with roots
in colonialism has been detrimental to national
unity and socioeconomic well-being in both coun-
tries (Irobi 2005). Braathen et al. (2000) show
how ethnic conicts in Liberia, Somalia, the Dem-
ocratic Republic of the Congo, Uganda, and Chad
led to civil wars exacerbated by a struggle for
ethnic identities and resources as well as an under-
lying set of complex interactive causes. The activ-
ities of national-level institutions that promote
ethnic cohesion as well as international and inter-
governmental organizations like the United
Nations and World Bank that aim to maintain
international peace and security should be encour-
aged because these could help reduce ethnic con-
icts that worsen ethnic poverty in developing
country contexts (Kozel 2014;UN2018;
WorldBankGroup 2020).
Ethnic Poverty in Developed Countries
Poverty in developed countries is typically mea-
sured in relation to the average overall household
income. A threshold representing a proportion of
average incomes is calculated and those with
incomes below this threshold (typically 60% of
the median income or the minimum amount of
income needed to cover basic needs) are deemed
poor (Dhongde and Haveman 2015; Platt 2011).
This method is useful in illustrating the relation-
ship between different forms of economic
inequalities and poverty. For instance, a key
assessment of poverty in the USA is the Ofcial
Poverty Measure (OPM), which is a comparison
between a households income and the cost of
necessities.
Generally, poverty has decreased substantially
for the overall population in most developed
countries since the 1960s, and trends over time
also show progress in shrinking the ethnic poverty
gap (Kazemipur and Halli 2000; Platt 2011).
According to the 2018 US Census Data, the
highest poverty rate by ethnicity was 25.4%
found among Native Americans, with blacks hav-
ing the second-highest poverty rate at 20.8%.
Hispanics of any race had the third-highest pov-
erty rate at 17.6%, while Asians had a poverty rate
of 10.1% as did whites (PovertyUSA 2018). The
ethnic poverty gap in the USA has practical impli-
cations for housing and healthcare affordability,
and food insecurity (Dhongde and Haveman
2015). A 2018 report by the Centre for American
Progress (CAP) highlighted the fact that African
American families had a fraction of the wealth of
white families, leaving them more economically
insecure and with far fewer opportunities for eco-
nomic mobility. In particular, African Americans
owned approximately one-tenth of the wealth of
white Americans. Less wealth translates into
fewer opportunities for upward mobility and is
compounded by lower income levels and fewer
chances to build wealth or pass accumulated
wealth down to future generations (Loury 2005).
In addition, black households were more likely to
experience negative income shocks but less likely
to have access to emergency savings (CAP 2018).
Several key factors exacerbate this vicious
cycle of wealth inequality for black households
in the USA. Black households, for example, have
far less access to tax-advantaged forms of savings,
due in part to a long history of employment dis-
crimination and other discriminatory practices
(Dhongde and Haveman 2015). A well-
documented history of mortgage market discrim-
ination also means that blacks are signicantly
less likely to be homeowners than whites, which
means they have less access to the savings and tax
benets that come with owning a home (CAP
2018; Hanson et al. 2016). Persistent labor market
discrimination and segregation also force blacks
Ethnic Poverty: Causes, Implications, and Solutions 5
into fewer and less advantageous employment
opportunities than their white counterparts
(Loury 2005). Thus, African Americans have
less access to stable jobs, good wages, and retire-
ment benets at work all key drivers by which
American families gain access to savings
(PovertyUSA 2018). Moreover, under the current
tax code in the USA, families with higher incomes
receive increased tax incentives associated with
both housing and retirement savings (CAP 2018;
Dhongde and Haveman 2015). Because African
Americans tend to have lower incomes, they inev-
itably receive fewer tax benets even if they are
homeowners or have retirement savings accounts.
The bottom line is that persistent housing and
labor market discrimination and segregation
worsen the damaging cycle of wealth inequality
for African Americans (CAP 2018; Loury 2005).
In the UK, the poverty rates in 2015 were about
50% for Bangladeshi groups, 47% for Pakistani,
40% for black, 35% for Chinese, and 25% for
Indian, compared with 19% for white ethnic
groups (Weekes-Bernard 2017). Minority ethnic
groups are also more frequently in persistent pov-
erty (Platt and Nandi 2020). For example, in con-
trast to 13% for white individuals, Caribbean,
Bangladeshi, African, and Pakistani individuals
had persistent poverty rates of 23%, 24%, 31%,
and 37%, respectively, in 20152016 (Weekes-
Bernard 2017). Within white groups in the UK,
poverty rates differ too. For example, Gypsy/Irish
travelers experience some of the highest unem-
ployment rates of all ethnic groups, and concen-
tration in low pay for some EU migrants is also
substantial (Weekes-Bernard 2017). This seems to
be particularly expressed in homelessness rates
for EU migrants with 36% of rough-sleepers
being from Central and Eastern European (CEE)
countries, 5% from African countries, and 4%
from Asian countries, even though a greater pro-
portion of EU citizens have work compared to
Black and Minority Ethnic (BAME) citizens
within the UK (Platt 2011).
Ethnic poverty is also recorded in other devel-
oped countries where there are indigenous peo-
ples. For example, the indigenous peoples in
Australia, Canada, and New Zealand have all
reported higher poverty rates (Cornell 2006).
It should also be noted that Western Europe has
witnessed an inux of Eastern Europeans and
skilled migrants in the last two decades. These
include ethnic minorities who have also reported
higher poverty rates and social exclusion
(Schmidt 1997; Wrench et al. 2016). Certain
drivers of poverty are important in explaining
the poverty variations for ethnic groups in devel-
oped countries.
Historical Factors
Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the USA are
examples of settler societies, states in which the
now predominant population arises from immi-
grants, primarily from Britain, and the indigenous
population has become a displaced minority.
Supplanting the indigenous peoples in these coun-
tries entailed enormous indigenous resource
losses, the eventual destruction of indigenous
economies, a good deal of social disorganization,
precipitous population declines, and subjection to
tutelary and assimilationist policies antagonistic
to indigenous cultures (Armitage 1995). This his-
tory had catastrophic and long-lasting effects on
the original inhabitants. Indigenous populations
in each of these societies are now at or near the
bottom of the scale of socioeconomic welfare
(Cornell 2006).
The UK itself has a long history with ethnic
minorities dating back to the rst Jewish commu-
nity in 1070 (BBC 2020; MigrationMuseum
2017). The story of black people in the UK dates
back to when Romans ruled Britain and some
Chinese communities in the UK date back to the
arrival of Chinese seamen in Europe (Costello
2001; Platt and Nandi 2020). Since the 1940s,
there has been substantial immigration from
Africa, the West Indies, and the Indian Subconti-
nent as a result of the legacy of ties forged by the
British Empire (Piper 2018). France has also
followed similar historical patterns especially
with regard to the former French colonies
(Garbaye 2005).
There has been a centrality of race in the devel-
opment of the USA, with catastrophic conse-
quences for the Africans who were not invited as
settlers but forcefully brought to the country as
slaves (Panayi 1996). Formal and informal
6 Ethnic Poverty: Causes, Implications, and Solutions
constraints have prevented people of color from
participating fully in central components of eco-
nomic life, including employment, social mobil-
ity, and homeownership. Recently, racial biases in
the criminal justice system of the USA have been
highlighted (Hetey and Eberhardt 2018; Stewart
et al. 2020).
Educational Variations
In 1964, the Civil Rights Act of the USA ended
segregation and discrimination in the workplace,
and the Act was subsequently amended in 1972
with the addition of Title IX, to eliminate discrim-
ination in educational institutions (Brown 2004;
Fisk and Chemerinsky 1998). These changes
affected the institutional and normative barriers
to higher education for ethnic minorities (Everett
et al. 2011). Other countries have passed similar
laws with the result that ethnic groups are varied
in post-secondary educational attainment (Garcia
and Bayer 2005).
Research using UK data shows that both pri-
mary and secondary effects operate to produce
ethnic inequalities in educational attainments
(Platt 2011; Weekes-Bernard 2017). In general,
ethnic groups often appear disadvantaged educa-
tionally relative to the white majority, but when
socioeconomic variables are accounted for, some
ethnic groups are advantaged relative to the
white majority (Jackson 2012; Strand 2011).
Educational variations between ethnic groups are
also related to cognitive functions, perceived dis-
crimination, depression, birth-rates, incarceration-
rates, and healthy lifestyle choices (Assari et al.
2019; Leggett et al. 2019; Ward et al. 2019).
Employment and Pay Disparities
Despite facsimile policies that emphasize equal
access to education and employment in developed
countries, discrimination remains a critical barrier
to equal employment. Several studies have found
that both ethnic minorities and women are called
back for interviews 50% less frequently than com-
parable whites and males, hired less often for
high-skill jobs, and once hired are paid less
(Bertrand and Mullainathan 2004). Thus, despite
the increasing educational gains made by ethnic
minority individuals, many are overqualied for
the jobs that they do. Ethnic minority workers also
often report not being given pay rises and being
passed over for promotion (Zwysen and Longhi
2018). European research reveals that the regional
demand for labor also has a signicant effect on
the employment chances for most ethnic minority
groups, as do institutional arrangements and the
time period being considered (Bevelander and
Veenman 2004).
Another very important driver for the dispro-
portionately high poverty rates among ethnic
minority groups is the concentration of such
workers in low-paid work. Ethnic minority
workers are more likely to work in low-paid sec-
tors with limited progression opportunities and
lower wages. Lack of movement out of low-paid
work increases the risk of poverty among ethnic
groups. In addition, there is generally a lower
percentage of ethnic minority workers who
are managers, directors, and senior ofcials
(MacKenzie and Forde 2009; Netto et al. 2015).
In the face of barriers to employment and career
advancement, research indicates three main strat-
egies individuals use in relation to discourses of
ethnicity: rejecting, redening, and adopting dis-
cursively available positions (Van Laer and
Janssens 2017; Netto et al. 2015). These strategies
are characterized by inherent tensions and contra-
dictions, as all three involve both resistance and
compliance, simultaneously challenging and
reproducing discourses of ethnicity and relations
of power. Tensions arise as struggles come to
conict, forcing ethnic minority individuals to
make important tradeoffs in their career paths
that non-ethnic minority individuals do not have
to (Van Laer and Janssens 2017).
Entrepreneurship Inequalities
Entrepreneurship is an important route out of pov-
erty for ethnic minority individuals, particularly
for foreign-born migrants and recent arrivals in
developed countries (Pruthi et al. 2018). Early-
stage entrepreneurial activity among ethnic
minority individuals is twice that of the local
population in many developed countries (Daniel
et al. 2019; Levie 2007). European migrant entre-
preneurship is determined by some distinct push
factors, such as high unemployment rates and low
Ethnic Poverty: Causes, Implications, and Solutions 7
status in the labor market. In addition, informal
and labor-intensive sectors, the existence of an
underground economy, small companies, and tra-
ditional household structures all prompt migrant
entrepreneurship in Southern European countries
(Baycan-Levent and Nijkamp 2009).
Ethnic minority entrepreneurs (EMEs) in
developed countries have been responsible for
innovative businesses; but they usually face sig-
nicant challenges, including the lack of nancial
and social capital, an unfamiliarity with regula-
tions and the host countrys labor market, poor
management and communication skills, and
the liability of outsidership (Mickiewicz and
Olarewaju 2020; Ram et al. 2003). Thus, while
ethnic minority individuals are already a socio-
economically disadvantaged group, ethnic entre-
preneurs are in an even more precarious situation.
EMEs are traditionally associated with low
skilled, lower growth and hence low return sectors
such as retailing, restaurants, fast-food provision,
and personal services (Clark et al. 2017; Edwards
and Ram 2006).
Solutions to Ethnic Poverty in Developed
Countries
Underlying the drivers of poverty for ethnic
minorities in many developed countries are sev-
eral socioeconomic factors in addition to other
considerations, which include discrimination, rac-
ism, geographical location, demographics, and
migration status (Platt and Nandi 2020; Weekes-
Bernard 2017). The intersection of these factors
has serious consequences for ethnic minorities.
For example, ethnic minorities were particularly
affected by the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK
and USA. In particular, the risk of death for some
ethnic minority individuals who contracted
COVID-19 in these countries was two to three
times more compared to white individuals
(Aldridge et al. 2020). This disparity was a result
of the underlying social and economic risk factors
that ethnic minorities face, such as living in over-
crowded and urban accommodation, being
employed in riskier lower-skilled jobs, and having
reduced access to healthcare (COVID and Team
2020; Khunti et al. 2020).
Many of the drivers of poverty among
working-age groups across all ethnic groups are
broadly similar. Ethnic minorities consistently
report reduced access to education, lack of social
and nancial capital, unemployment, low pay, and
poor progression from low-paid sector work. This
suggests similar solutions for all groups, which
would lead to better-quality jobs and higher pay
(Platt 2019; Weekes-Bernard 2017). However,
given that some of the drivers of poverty, such as
higher unemployment and inactivity rates, dispro-
portionately affect ethnic groups, specic forms
of outreach activity and drawing on local knowl-
edge may be needed in these contexts. For exam-
ple, most of the research on ethnic poverty
conducted in Japan focus on explaining under-
achievement in relationship to buraku people,
zainichi Koreans, indigenous peoples, and new
migrants, and it is characterized using qualitative
research methods and more interpretative and
interactionist approaches to social science inves-
tigation (Okano 2019). Three major research tra-
ditions are dominant: (i) quantitative descriptions
of minority studentseducational achievements,
(ii) schooling processes in relation to discrimina-
tion, school interventions, and identity formation;
and (ii) home cultures (Okano 2019). The most
dominant tradition is schooling processes in rela-
tion to discrimination, school interventions, and
identity formation. One of the distinctive charac-
teristics of these studies is localization,whereby
the relationship is examined in selected localities
with a focus on a single ethnic group, rather than
as a national phenomenon (Okano 2019). Such
local approaches could offer solutions that give a
better t with localized experiences of poverty
experienced by ethnic minorities.
Similarly, government solutions to reduce eth-
nic poverty in developed country contexts include
interventions that ensure that education, training,
and apprenticeships are provided for ethnic
minorities as well as schemes that help tackle
low pay among ethnic minority workers
(Weekes-Bernard 2017). There is a need for pol-
icies that focus on education, skills, and training
for ethnic groups particularly digital, literacy, and
numeracy skills. Moreover, policies should also
be encouraged that monitor the workforce in
8 Ethnic Poverty: Causes, Implications, and Solutions
relation to ethnicity, which should include the
recruitment, retention, and progression phases of
jobs (Platt 2011). Authorities need to work with
employers to provide better-paid jobs and they
should do more to listen to and encourage
employers to hire a diverse range of skills and
experiences. It is advisable to consider putting
targets for ethnic minority representation on
boards, something that has proven successful in
the case of gender (Berkeley et al. 2006). It is also
important to recognize the benets of positive
discrimination in the labor market, rather than
view legislation to combat ethnic inequality as
red tape or political correctness (Berkeley et al.
2006). Mortgage market discrimination needs to
be eliminated as this would allow ethnic minori-
ties to take advantage of the savings and tax ben-
ets that come with owning a home (CAP 2018;
Hanson et al. 2016).
Access to nancing and government procure-
ment markets offer ways for EMEs to achieve
rapid expansion and establish viable enterprises
by leveraging their minority status and social net-
works (Bates et al. 2018; Shelton and Minniti
2018). Ethnic minority migrant entrepreneurs
can also make use of their professional and per-
sonal ethnic ties and prior experience of doing
business in their home country (Mickiewicz and
Olarewaju 2018; Pruthi et al. 2018). European
research also shows that the success of EMEs in
developed countries depends on the immigration
policy of the host country, the existence of a
co-ethnic community and its economic
embeddedness, the operation of social networks
among migrant communities, the possibility of
acquiring capital and other informal resources
among the ethnic community, and institutional
factors that encourage or discourage EMEs
(Baycan-Levent and Nijkamp 2009).
Concluding Summary
Goal 1 of the UN SDGs is to end poverty in all
forms everywhere (UN 2018). This cannot be
achieved without eradicating ethnic poverty
from both developing and developed countries.
Inequality and poverty have been shown to be
primary economic determinants of crime and vio-
lence, and excessive inequality may slow a
countrys economic development (Fosu 2015;
Lupton et al. 2018). Unfortunately, there is evi-
dence that ethnic differences in the experience of
poverty are large, intractable, and poorly under-
stood (Platt 2011).
Although it is conventional for economists,
policymakers, and governments to see the indi-
vidual as an atomized agent acting more or less
independently, seeking to make the best of oppor-
tunities at hand (Loury 2005). In actuality, indi-
viduals are members of nuclear and extended
families, belong to religious and linguistic group-
ings, have ethnic and racial identities, and are
attached to particular localities (Kozel 2014;
Loury 2005). An individuals location within
this network of social afliations substantially
affects access to various resources and the proba-
bility of being poor (Loury 2005; Olarewaju
2016).
In the worlds largest economy, the USA, bla-
tant types of racial discrimination widespread
prior to the 1960s are now infrequent (Danziger
et al. 2005). Indeed, many employers note their
commitment to non-discrimination in job adver-
tisements, and most real estate brokersofces
post statements about their dedication to equal
opportunities (CAP 2018; Hanson et al. 2016).
However, less obvious types of ethnic discrimina-
tion continue and contribute to persisting high
levels of racial segregation (Loury 2005). Some
brokers still do not show black and white
homeseekers the same housing, some under-
writers still do not provide home insurance to
units located in ethnic minority neighborhoods,
and some police ofcers stop drivers who are
black much more frequently than those who are
white (Danziger et al. 2005). Hiring patterns
documented by employer surveys suggest that
establishments located in the suburbs, particularly
small establishments serving mostly white cus-
tomers, continue to prefer white applicants over
African Americans (Holzer 2001; Loury 2005).
Thus, enforcement of existing equal employment
laws needs to be enhanced to ensure that all estab-
lishments abide by them (Danziger et al. 2005;
Loury 2005).
Ethnic Poverty: Causes, Implications, and Solutions 9
The main lessons from this entry reveal that to
reduce ethnic poverty in all contexts, ethnic
minorities should be given better access to educa-
tion, resources, infrastructure, and opportunities
to progress from low-paid sector work (Platt
2019; Weekes-Bernard 2017). In addition, there
is a need for policies that prevent all forms of
ethnic discrimination (Dhongde and Haveman
2015; Olarewaju 2019).
Around the world, ethnic minorities may also
experience non-economic forms of poverty
resulting from discrimination and structural
stigma (Churchill and Smyth 2017; Vang and
Chang 2019). They often face religious persecu-
tion, and even when they achieve high-level edu-
cational attainments and nd themselves in decent
jobs, they often report workplace discrimination
which can have implications for psychological
well-being and life satisfaction (Vang et al.
2019). Such economic and non-economic forms
of poverty have far-reaching consequences and
can affect life expectancy (Cornell 2006). It is
important that they are tackled for the
overall good.
Cross-References
Disadvantaged Neighborhoods
Poverty and Globalisation
Poverty Lines
Race and Poverty
Race Discrimination
References
Agostini C, Brown PH, Roman AC (2010) Poverty and
inequality among ethnic groups in Chile. World Dev
38(7):10361046
Aldridge RW, Lewer D, Katikireddi SV, Mathur R,
Pathak N, Burns R, ... Abubakar I (2020) Black,
Asian and Minority Ethnic groups in England are at
increased risk of death from COVID-19: indirect
standardisation of NHS mortality data. Wellcome
Open Res 5:88
Alesina A, Michalopoulos S, Papaioannou E (2016) Ethnic
inequality. J Polit Econ 124(2):428488
Armitage A (1995) Comparing the policy of aboriginal
assimilation. UBC Press, Australia, Canada, and New
Zealand
Assari S, Farokhnia M, Mistry R (2019) Education attain-
ment and alcohol binge drinking: diminished returns of
Hispanics in Los Angeles. Behav Sci 9(1):9
Bates T, Bradford WD, Seamans R (2018) Minority entre-
preneurship in twenty-rst century America. Small Bus
Econ 50(3):415427
Baulch B, Nguyen HTM, Phuong PTT, Pham HT
(2010) Ethnic minority poverty in Vietnam (No. 169).
Chronic Poverty Research Center, Manchester
Baycan-Levent T, Nijkamp P (2009) Characteristics of
migrant entrepreneurship in Europe. Entrep Reg Dev
21(4):375397
BBC (2020) Reasons for immigration in the Medieval era.
Retrieved June 21, 2020, from https://www.bbc.co.uk/
bitesize/guides/zq9wbk7/revision/2
Berkeley R, Khan O, Ambikaipaker M (2006) Whats new
about new immigrants in twenty-rst century Britain?
Joseph Rowntree Foundation, York
Bertrand M, Mullainathan S (2004) Are Emily and Greg
more employable than Lakisha and Jamal? A eld
experiment on labor market discrimination. Am Econ
Rev 94(4):9911013
Bevelander P, Veenman J (2004) Variation in perspective:
the employment success of ethnic minority males in the
Netherlands, 19882002. Int Migr 42(4):3564
Bidgman B (2008) Why are ethnically divided countries
poor. J Macroecon 30:118
Braathen E, Bøås M, Sæther G, (Eds.) (2000) Ethnicity
kills?: the politics of war, peace and ethnicity in sub-
Saharan Africa. Springer
Brand ES, Ruiz RA, Padilla AM (1974) Ethnic identica-
tion and preference: a review. Psychol Bull 81(11):860
Brown F (2004) The rst serious implementation of
Brown: the 1964 Civil Rights Act and beyond.
J Negro Educ 73:182190
Brown PH, Park A (2002) Education and poverty in rural
China. Econ Educ Rev 21(6):523541
CAP (2018) Center for American progress systematic
inequality. Retrieved June 27, 2020, from https://www.
americanprogress.org/issues/race/reports/2018/02/21/
447051/systematic-inequality/
Churchill SA, Smyth R (2017) Ethnic diversity and pov-
erty. World Dev 95:285302
Clark K, Drinkwater S, Robinson C (2017) Self-
employment amongst migrant groups: new evidence
from England and Wales. Small Bus Econ 48(4):
10471069
Collier P (2007) Poverty reduction in Africa. Proc Natl
Acad Sci 104(43):1676316768
Cornell SE (2006) Indigenous peoples, poverty and self-
determination in Australia, New Zealand, Canada and
the United States. Native Nations Institute for Leader-
ship, Management, and Policy, Tuscon
Costello R (2001) Black Liverpool: the early history of
Britains oldest Black Community, 17301918. Picton,
Liverpool. Countyvise
10 Ethnic Poverty: Causes, Implications, and Solutions
COVID, C. D. C., & Team, R (2020) Severe outcomes
among patients with coronavirus disease 2019
(COVID-19) United States, February 12March
16, 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 69(12):
343346
Cuong VN, Tung DP, Westbrook D (2015) Do the poorest
ethnic minorities benet from a large-scale poverty
reduction program? Evidence from Vietnam. Q Rev
Econ Finance 56:314
Daniel EM, Henley A, Anwar MN (2019) Contemporary
ethnic minority entrepreneurship in the UK: a quanti-
tative exploration of break out and entrepreneurial
quality. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behav-
iour and Research
Danziger S, Reed D, Brown TN (2005) Poverty and pros-
perity: prospects for reducing racial/ethnic economic
disparities in the United States. In: Racism and public
policy. Palgrave Macmillan, London, pp 149181
Davis TJ, Kalu-Nwiwu A (2001) Education, ethnicity and
national integration in the history of Nigeria: continu-
ing problems of Africas colonial legacy. J Negro Hist
86(1):111
Dhongde S, Haveman R (2015) Multi-dimensional poverty
index: an application to the United States. Available at
SSRN 2588584
Edwards P, Ram M (2006) Surviving on the margins of the
economy: working relationships in small, low-wage
rms. J Manag Stud 43(4):895916
Elu JU, Loubert L (2013) Earnings inequality and the
intersectionality of gender and ethnicity in Sub-
Saharan Africa: the case of Tanzanian manufacturing.
Am Econ Rev 103(3):289292
Engvall A (2007) Ethnic minorities and rural poverty in
Lao PDR (No. 232). European Institute of Japanese
Studies, Stockholm School of Economics, Stockholm
Everett BG, Rogers RG, Hummer RA, Krueger PM
(2011) Trends in educational attainment by race/ethnic-
ity, nativity, and sex in the United States, 19892005.
Ethn Racial Stud 34(9):15431566
Fisk C, Chemerinsky E (1998) Civil rights without reme-
dies: vicarious liability under title VII, section 1983,
and title IX. Wm Mary Bill Rts J 7:755
Fosu AK (2015) Growth, inequality and poverty in Sub-
Saharan Africa: recent progress in a global context. Oxf
Dev Stud 43(1):4459
Fox L, Wimer C, Garnkel I, Kaushal N, Waldfogel
J (2015) Waging war on poverty: poverty trends using
a historical supplemental poverty measure. J Policy
Anal Manage 34(3):567592
Garbaye R (2005) Getting into local power: The politics of
ethnic minorities in British and French cities, vol 23.
John Wiley & Sons
Garcia LM, Bayer AE (2005) Variations between Latino
groups in US post-secondary educational attainment.
Res High Educ 46(5):511533
Gradín C (2016) Poverty and ethnicity in Asian countries.
In: The Asian poverty miracle. Edward Elgar,
Northampton
Gustafsson B, Sai D (2009) Temporary and persistent
poverty among ethnic minorities and the majority in
rural China. Rev Income Wealth 55:588606
Hanson A, Hawley Z, Martin H, Liu B (2016) Discrimina-
tion in mortgage lending: evidence from a correspon-
dence experiment. J Urban Econ 92:4865
Harff B (2018) Ethnic conict in world politics. Routledge
Hetey RC, Eberhardt JL (2018) The numbers dont speak
for themselves: racial disparities and the persistence of
inequality in the criminal justice system. Curr Dir
Psychol Sci 27(3):183187
Holzer HJ (2001) Outcomes among men. In: America
becoming: racial trends and their consequences,
vol 2. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, p 98
Imai KS, Gaiha R, Kang W (2011) Poverty, inequality and
ethnic minorities in Vietnam. Int Rev Appl Econ
25(3):249282
Irobi EG (2005) Ethnic conict management in Africa: a
comparative case study of Nigeria and South Africa.
Outskirts
Jackson M (2012) Bold choices: how ethnic inequalities in
educational attainment are suppressed. Oxf Rev Educ
38(2):189208
Kabeer N (2006) Poverty, social exclusion and the MDGs:
the challenge of durable inequalitiesin the Asian
context. IDS Bull 37:64
Kazemipur A, Halli SS (2000) The colour of poverty: a
study of the poverty of ethnic and immigrant groups in
Canada. Int Migr 38(1):89108
Khunti K, Singh AK, Pareek M, Hanif W (2020) Is ethnic-
ity linked to incidence or outcomes of covid-19?
Br Med J 369:m1548
Kon ZR, Lackan N (2008) Ethnic disparities in access to
care in post-apartheid South Africa. Am J Public Health
98(12):22722277
Kozel V (2014) Reducing poverty among ethnic minori-
ties. Retrieved from https://elibrary.worldbank.org/doi/
pdf/10.1596/978-1-4648-0006-1_ch5
Leggett A, Clarke P, Zivin K, McCammon RJ, Elliott MR,
Langa KM (2019) Recent improvements in cognitive
functioning among older US adults: how much does
increasing educational attainment explain? J Gerontol:
Ser B 74(3):536545
Levie J (2007) Immigration, in-migration, ethnicity and
entrepreneurship in the United Kingdom. Small Bus
Econ 28(23):143169
Levien M (2018) Dispossession without development:
land grabs in neoliberal India. Oxford University
Press, Oxford
Liu Y, Liu J, Zhou Y (2017) Spatio-temporal patterns of
rural poverty in China and targeted poverty alleviation
strategies. J Rural Stud 52:6675
Loury GC (2005) Racial stigma and its consequences.
Focus 24(1):16
Lupton NC, Jiang GF, Escobar LF, Jiménez A (2018)
National income inequality and international business
expansion. Bus Soc 7650318816493
MacKenzie R, Forde C (2009) The rhetoric of the good
workerversus the realities of employersuse and the
Ethnic Poverty: Causes, Implications, and Solutions 11
experiences of migrant workers. Work Employ Soc
23(1):142159
Meyer K, Peng MW (2016) International business. Cengage
Learning
Michalopoulos S, Papaioannou E (2016) The long-run
effects of the scramble for Africa. Am Econ Rev
106(7):18021848
Mickiewicz TM, Olarewaju TIA (2018) Evolution in trans-
action costs and ownership of public-private partner-
ships: Shonga farms. Acad Manage Proc 2018(1):
11006. Academy of Management Briarcliff Manor,
NY 10510
Mickiewicz T, Olarewaju T (2020) New venture evolution
of migrants under institutional voids: lessons from
Shonga farms in Nigeria. Int Small Bus J. https://doi.
org/10.1177/0266242619896266
MigrationMuseum (2017) Jewish timeline. Retrieved June
21, 2020, from https://www.migrationmuseum.org/wp-
content/uploads/2017/04/MMP-SOW-Lesson-4-
Jewish-Timeline-copy.pdf
Netto G, Hudson M, Noon M, Sosenko F, De Lima P,
Kamenou-Aigbekaen N (2015) Migration, ethnicity
and progression from low-paid work: implications for
skills policy. Soc Policy Soc 14(4):509522
Odeyemi JO (2014) A political history of Nigeria and the
crisis of ethnicity in nation-building. Int J Dev Soc
3(1):112
Okano KH (2019) Japan: the localization approach and an
emerging trend toward the study of poverty within
ethnicity and inequality. In: The Palgrave handbook
of race and ethnic inequalities in education, Springer,
Cham, pp 747781
Olarewaju T (2016) Linking labour force participation,
education, labour wages and household consumption
in developing countries: push and pull effects in self-
employment-evidence from Nigeria (Doctoral disserta-
tion, Aston University)
Olarewaju T (2018) Organising household consumption
and occupational proportions: evidence from Nigeria.
Int J Organ Anal 26(4). https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-
03-2017-1141
Olarewaju TIA (2019) Can equalizing educational endow-
ments between men and women create more female
self-employed value in Nigeria? J Creat Value 5(1):
6883. https://doi.org/10.1177/2394964318815313
Olarewaju TIA, Mickiewicz T, Tamvada JP (2019) The
returns to occupations: the role of minimum wage and
gender in Nigeria. World Dev Perspect 13:7586
Panayi P (1996) The historiography of immigrants and
ethnic minorities: Britain compared with the USA.
Ethn Racial Stud 19(4):823840
Piper N (2018) Racism, nationalism and citizenship: ethnic
minorities in Britain and Germany. Routledge
Platt L (2011) Inequality within ethnic groups. Joseph
Rowntree Foundation. Retrieved from https://www.
jrf.org.uk/sites/default/les/jrf/migrated/les/
inequality-ethnicity-poverty-full.pdf
Platt L (2019) Understanding inequalities: stratication
and difference. John Wiley & Sons
Platt L, Nandi A (2020) Ethnic diversity in the UK: new
opportunities and changing constraints. Taylor &
Francis, pp 839856
PovertyUSA (2018) The population of poverty USA.
Retrieved May 6, 2020, from https://www.povertyusa.
org/facts
Pruthi S, Basu A, Wright M (2018) Ethnic ties, motiva-
tions, and home country entry strategy of transnational
entrepreneurs. J Int Entrep 16(2):210243
Ram M, Smallbone D, Deakins D, Jones T (2003) Banking
on break-out:nance and the development of ethnic
minority businesses. J Ethn Migr Stud 29(4):663681
Revenga A, Ringold D, Tracy WM (2002) Poverty and
ethnicity: a cross-country study of Roma poverty in
Central Europe. The World Bank
Ruhlandt RWS, Levitt R, Jain R, Hall D (2020) Drivers of
data and analytics utilization within (smart) cities: a
multimethod approach. J Manag Eng 36(2):4019050
Schech SB, Alwy A (2004) Ethnic inequalities in educa-
tion in Kenya. Int Educ J 5:266
Schmidt CM (1997) Immigrant performance in Germany:
labor earnings of ethnic German migrants and foreign
guest-workers. Q Rev Econ Finance 37:379397
Shelton LM, Minniti M (2018) Enhancing product market
access: minority entrepreneurship, status leveraging,
and preferential procurement programs. Small Bus
Econ 50(3):481498
Stewart EA, Warren PY, Hughes C, Brunson RK
(2020) Race, ethnicity, and criminal justice contact:
reections for future research. Race and Just 10(2):
119149
Strand S (2011) The limits of social class in explaining
ethnic gaps in educational attainment. Br Educ Res
J 37(2):197229
Sullivan DH, Ziegert AL (2008) Hispanic immigrant pov-
erty: does ethnic origin matter? Popul Res Policy Rev
27(6):667
Suryadarma D, Widyanti W, Suryahadi A, Sumarto S
(2006) From access to income: regional and ethnic
inequality in Indonesia. SMERU Research Institute,
Jakarta
UN (2018) Sustainable Development Goals. Retrieved
May 19, 2020, from https://www.un.org/sustainablede
velopment/poverty/
UN (2019) Ending poverty. Retrieved April 4, 2020, from
https://www.un.org/en/sections/issues-depth/poverty/
Van Laer K, Janssens M (2017) Agency of ethnic minority
employees: struggles around identity, career and social
change. Organization 24(2):198217
Vang ZM, Chang Y (2019) Immigrantsexperiences of
everyday discrimination in Canada: unpacking the con-
tributions of assimilation, race, and early socialization.
Int Migr Rev 53(2):602631
Vang ZM, Hou F, Elder K (2019) Perceived religious
discrimination, religiosity, and life satisfaction.
J Happiness Stud 20(6):19131932
Ward JB, Feinstein L, Vines AI, Robinson WR, Haan MN,
Aiello AE (2019) Perceived discrimination and
12 Ethnic Poverty: Causes, Implications, and Solutions
depressive symptoms among US Latinos: the modify-
ing role of educational attainment. Ethn Health
24(3):271286
Weekes-Bernard D (2017) Poverty and ethnicity in the
labour market. Joseph Rowntree Foundation. Retrieved
from https://www.housingnet.co.uk/pdf/Poverty_eth
nicity_round_up_Sep17.pdf
WorldBankGroup (2020) Ending poverty in China: lessons
for other countries and the challenges still ahead.
Retrieved June 22, 2020, from https://blogs.
worldbank.org/eastasiapacic/ending-poverty-in-
china-lessons-for-other-countries-and-challenges-still-
ahead
Wrench J, Rea A, Ouali N, (Eds.) (2016) Migrants, ethnic
minorities and the labour market: integration and exclu-
sion in Europe. Springer
Záhořík J (2011) Ethnicity and nationalism in Ethiopia.
ALPPI Ann Lang Polit Polit Identity 5:91108
Zwysen W, Longhi S (2018) Employment and earning
differences in the early career of ethnic minority British
graduates: the importance of university career, parental
background and area characteristics. J Ethn Migr Stud
44(1):154172
Ethnic Poverty: Causes, Implications, and Solutions 13
Article
Full-text available
This article shows how Information and Communication Technology (ICT), incorporating social media, can lead to accountability and transparency in a government's budget. Specifically, it examined how a Non-Governmental Organization (NGO) used ICT to foster citizenship engagement in the Nigerian government budgetary process. The article, using abductive reasoning, presents four citizen empowerment stages and four social marketing transition stages through which government budget transparency can be improved and corruption reduced. A model was also inferred that can help lessen the exclusivity around the government budget to encourage dialog and openness around the government budget in similar contexts. Furthermore, this article shows that the social transformative role for NGOs using ICT to increase government budget transparency and reduce corruption is a process that happens over time. Citation: Olarewaju, T, Rufai, I, Gallage, S. E-transparency and government budgetary corruption: A social marketing and transformation case from Nigeria. Electron j inf syst dev ctries. 2021; 87:e12167. https://doi.org/10.1002/isd2.12167
Article
Full-text available
Background : International and UK data suggest that Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic (BAME) groups are at increased risk of infection and death from COVID-19. We aimed to explore the risk of death in minority ethnic groups in England using data reported by NHS England. Methods : We used NHS data on patients with a positive COVID-19 test who died in hospitals in England published on 28th April, with deaths by ethnicity available from 1st March 2020 up to 5pm on 21 April 2020. We undertook indirect standardisation of these data (using the whole population of England as the reference) to produce ethnic specific standardised mortality ratios (SMRs) adjusted for age and geographical region. Results : The largest total number of deaths in minority ethnic groups were Indian (492 deaths) and Black Caribbean (460 deaths) groups. Adjusting for region we found a lower risk of death for White Irish (SMR 0.52; 95%CIs 0.45-0.60) and White British ethnic groups (0.88; 95%CIs 0.86-0.0.89), but increased risk of death for Black African (3.24; 95%CIs 2.90-3.62), Black Caribbean (2.21; 95%CIs 2.02-2.41), Pakistani (3.29; 95%CIs 2.96-3.64), Bangladeshi (2.41; 95%CIs 1.98-2.91) and Indian (1.70; 95%CIs 1.56-1.85) minority ethnic groups. Conclusion: Our analysis adds to the evidence that BAME people are at increased risk of death from COVID-19 even after adjusting for geographical region, but was limited by the lack of data on deaths outside of NHS settings and ethnicity denominator data being based on the 2011 census. Despite these limitations, we believe there is an urgent need to take action to reduce the risk of death for BAME groups and better understand why some ethnic groups experience greater risk. Actions that are likely to reduce these inequities include ensuring adequate income protection, reducing occupational risks, reducing barriers in accessing healthcare and providing culturally and linguistically appropriate public health communications.
Article
Full-text available
This article inductively builds theory on how transaction costs may be alleviated, and institutional voids bridged in developing economies, based on the case study of the successful migrants' entrepreneurial involvement in Nigerian agriculture: Shonga Farms. We posit that the iterative process of building conditions of trust that initiates with long-term commitment, involvement of the regional government, appropriate modes of financial contracts, and the gradual transitioning of controlling interests to private actors, are factors of success. We draw additional lessons by contrasting our case study with other similar migrant schemes that failed.
Article
Full-text available
Purpose Ethnic minority entrepreneurs (EMEs) are traditionally associated with lower growth industry sectors. The purpose of this paper is to draw on the theory of mixed embeddedness to determine if more recent EMEs have been able to break out of lower growth sectors and if break out varies across ethnic minority groups. It also compares entrepreneurial quality in terms of weekly hours worked, weekly earnings and job satisfaction. Design/methodology/approach Quantitative inferential statistical analysis is undertaken on data drawn from the large scale, social sciences data set for the UK, Understanding Society. Findings The study finds that break out is not associated with being a recent EME but does vary across ethnic minority groups. Break out is found to be associated with gender, education, English language proficiency and occupational status. Some variation in entrepreneurial quality is found for both recent EMEs and across ethnic minority groups. Practical implications Understanding the nature and quality of ethnic minority entrepreneurship is important since it informs public debate about migration, informs policy and shapes activities of future EMEs. Originality/value The study provides a theoretically grounded interpretation of the explanatory variables associated with EME break out and entrepreneurial quality. Second, it provides a large confirmatory study of break out and finally, it also finds an important empirical nuance to the concept of opportunity structure by identifying a variation over time in both external and socio-demographic factors.
Article
Full-text available
Journal of Creating Value: This article empirically investigates if women would be able to create more self-employed value if they had the same educational endowments as men in the unique gender disparity context of Nigeria. The article uses probit and Blinder–Oaxaca multivariate decomposition models to empirically conduct this analysis in a developing country taking advantage of two rounds of survey data. The analysis confirms that women would be able to create more self-employed value, particularly higher education self-employed value, if they had the same educational endowments as men. The article also highlights why gender parity does not exist in Nigeria and emphasizes the benefits of gender parity in this context. Permanent link: https://doi.org/10.1177/2394964318815313
Article
Full-text available
This paper examines the economic returns to being employers, paid workers and self-employed own account individuals in a lower middle income economy using quantile regressions while accounting for selection using Heckman selection models. The results suggest that although the majority of employers experience labour wage premiums throughout the income distribution, self-employed own account individuals experience a wage penalty at the lower quantiles of the income distribution where paid workers reap benefits from minimum wage guarantees, suggesting that minimum wage legislations may push individuals with low skills into self-employment. Furthermore, female employers and paid workers tend to be relatively well educated implying that education enables females to escape the job glass ceiling although males typically earn significantly more than females.
Article
Full-text available
According to the minorities’ diminished returns (MDR) theory, socioeconomic status (SES) indicators such as education attainment have smaller protective effects on health risk behaviors for racial and ethnic minority groups in comparison to the ‘dominant’ social group. However, most studies of MDR theory have been on comparison of Blacks versus Whites. Much less is known about diminished returns of SES in ethnic subpopulations (i.e., Hispanics versus non-Hispanic Whites). To test whether MDR also holds for the social patterning of problematic alcohol use among Hispanic and non-Hispanic Whites, this study investigated ethnic variations in the association between education attainment and alcohol binge drinking frequency in a population-based sample of adults. Los Angeles Family and Neighborhood Survey, 2001, included 907 non-Hispanic White and 2117 Hispanic White adults (≥18 years old). Hispanic ethnicity (moderator), education attainment (independent variable), alcohol binge drinking frequency (dependent variable), and gender, age, immigration status, employment status, self-rated health, and history of depression (confounders) were included in four linear regressions. In the overall sample that included both non-Hispanic and Hispanic Whites, higher education attainment was correlated with lower alcohol binge drinking frequency (b = −0.05, 95% CI = −0.09 - −0.02), net of covariates. A significant interaction was found between ethnicity and education attainment (b = 0.09; 95% CI = 0.00–0.17), indicating a stronger protective effect of high education attainment against alcohol binge drinking frequency for non-Hispanic than Hispanic Whites. In ethnic-stratified models, higher level of education attainment was associated with lower binge drinking frequency among non-Hispanic Whites (b = −0.11, 95% CI = −0.19 - −0.03), but not among Hispanic Whites (b = −0.01, 95% CI = −0.04 - 0.03). While, overall, higher education attainment is associated with lower frequency of alcohol binge drinking, this protective effect of education attainment seems to be weaker among Hispanic Whites compared to non-Hispanic Whites, a phenomenon consistent with the MDR theory.
Article
Full-text available
We examine the extent to which host country income inequality influences multinational enterprises’ (MNE) expansion strategy for foreign production investment, depending on their specific strategic objectives. Applying a transaction cost framework, we predict that national income inequality has an inverted U-shaped relationship with foreign production investment. As inequality increases, MNEs accrue lower transaction costs arising from interactions with various local actors, leading to higher probability of investment. As income inequality increases further, its effect on location attractiveness will become negative, as its attraction effect is increasingly offset by additional monitoring, bargaining, and security costs owing to the more fractious nature of high inequality societies. In addition, we suggest that the impact of income inequality is contingent on investment objectives: The inverted U-shaped relationship is stronger for efficiency-seeking investment but weaker for market-seeking and competence-enhancing investments. We find substantial support for our hypotheses through an analysis of 27 years (1986-2012) of data on Japanese MNEs’ overseas production entries.
Article
Data and analytics can be a facilitator and driver of growth for cities. Their significance will likely continue to grow and be amplified by new technological developments. However, research on cities' utilization of data and analytics has been comparatively vague and imprecise and requires a more holistic and systematic perspective. Therefore, this study examines the potential condition variables that could drive cities' utilization of data and analytics, employing a multimethod approach that includes comparative case studies, content analysis, and the Delphi method. This hybrid research approach allows the authors to combine the strengths of various research methods and is, therefore , among the first that uses this kind of approach in such a research context. The authors identify several indicators or drivers (structures, processes, leadership, strategy, culture, data infrastructure, data governance, skills, training, capacities, budgets) that are essential to build a theory around a city's utilization of data and analytics. In addition, a conceptual model classifies these potential drivers into six broad (super-ordinate) categories: organization, procedures, direction, data, competencies, and resources. For scholars, the study contributes to the growing body of knowledge by identifying potential drivers of cities' utilization of data and analytics. For practitioners, the study provides insights through the formation of a standardization tool (appropriate measurement techniques for each potential driver) for assessing cities' data and analytics utilization. In addition, the authors suggest directions for further research.