Content uploaded by Raymond John Uzwyshyn
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Raymond John Uzwyshyn on Oct 16, 2020
Content may be subject to copyright.
1
M
Open Source Tools for a
Digital Research Ecosystem
Does research at your institution have the visibility and impact it
could? A new class of open source tools can be used to create a
modernized, 21st century 'digital research ecosystem' that will help
faculty and graduate researchers advance their research objectives
and gain. C-Level View | Feature
A Q&A with Ray Uzwyshyn
• By Mary Grush
• 05/11/2020
At colleges and universities today, we rely on a host of digital materials, processes, and services for
instruction and administration. While most courses aren't conducted fully online, you would be
hard pressed to find any that don't include digital elements. We simply do things differently now
than we did decades ago in education. Academic institutions have successfully moved to digital
infrastructures that support expectations for teaching and learning in a digital age.
2
But has there been a similar or parallel shift in the arena of scholarly research? We asked Ray
Uzwyshyn, director of collections and digital services at Texas State University, to help us examine
the trends and explore how institutions might use a new class of open source tools to create a
modernized 'digital research ecosystem' that supports faculty and graduate research in the 21st
century.
We need a global digital research infrastructure ecosystem that responds to the possibilities
networked communication allows." — Ray Uzwyshyn
Mary Grush: Teaching and learning in higher education has moved into the digital age. But what
about research?
Ray Uzwyshyn: Our researchers have certainly witnessed the paradigm shift that has occurred in
instruction. They have also experienced the move to online modalities for research. Scholars now
accomplish much of their work in a networked environment, but too often, good research still
lingers unknown in those same online infrastructures.
Grush: Why is that?
Uzwyshyn: The academic research cycle traditionally occurs through the peer review processes of
academic journals and conferences. These familiar older structures were set up more than a
century ago. Back then, these were the leading communications infrastructures, but currently, new
possibilities have opened.
Grush: At the Texas State University Libraries, you've worked on these challenges through your
ongoing project to create a Digital Scholarship Research Ecosystem. How does this project offer
faculty and graduate students a modern digital research infrastructure at your own institution and
beyond?
3
Uzwyshyn: Our project offers a best practices model for placing an institution's vast and
differentiated bodies of research and intellectual capital into coherent online frameworks — a
digital research infrastructure ecosystem.
Grush: How are other higher education institutions responding to the challenge of building such
infrastructures?
Uzwyshyn: Institutions are largely in opening stages. To create these types of digital research
infrastructures, a few leading research institutions have realized the potential of certain
applications to enable their researchers online; to aggregate, collect, and share the impact of their
institution's research; and to aid in discovering, gathering, and analyzing related research.
Grush: Is it only the R1s and elite institutions that have the means to address this? Would you say,
maybe ten percent of U.S. colleges and universities are the leading institutions you mentioned?
Uzwyshyn: Ten percent have realized the potential and are early adopters or developers. The
remaining 90 percent have not yet fully enabled their researchers with the range of current
possibilities. And this is for a variety of reasons. Many are primarily teaching institutions, and they
simply don't have that research focus at this time.
Our project offers a best practices model for placing an
institution's vast and differentiated bodies of research
and intellectual capital into coherent online
frameworks — a digital research infrastructure
ecosystem.
Grush: And what about research faculty working at those "90 percent" institutions?
Uzwyshyn: Many of those faculty are independently placing their work online and publishing,
archiving, and sharing it in various digital forms. But they aren't supported by a robust, digital
infrastructure that aggregates their institution's intellectual capital. That is often done by outside
vendor databases that buy and/or aggregate disciplinary journal content and society research
publications — research content they then sell back to the faculty or institution.
Grush: You mentioned that some leading institutions have created useful tools that support
various components of a larger digital research ecosystem. How does open source figure into this?
Does open source contribute to helping institutions create more complete digital research
infrastructures for their own communities?
4
Uzwyshyn: Yes, and there have been several open source initiatives in higher education that each
address these new paradigm possibilities — Harvard University's Dataverse; MIT's original digital
collections repository, DSpace; and the Texas Digital Library and Texas State's Vireo project are
examples. These separate and largely open source endeavors are now being placed together into
coherent ecosystems with compatible components and APIs that support interoperability.
Grush: So, do institutions need a range of interoperable components that enable them to create a
complete digital research infrastructure to serve their faculty and students who may be engaged in
research?
Uzwyshyn: Yes. They do. We need a global digital research infrastructure ecosystem that responds
to the possibilities networked communication allows. I like to highlight this "ecosystem" metaphor
because of the extensive network effects potential with regards to academic research.
Institutions should start thinking about academic
research in terms of ecosystems, using an
environmental metaphor: a digital research ecosystem
that will aggregate, access, and archive research and
data.
Grush: It sounds like the tide is turning when it comes to support for digital research scholarship.
What's the best way to move forward, for most institutions — especially those in that 90 percent
you speak of? How should they approach all this?
Uzwyshyn: Institutions should start thinking about academic research in terms of ecosystems,
using an environmental metaphor: a digital research ecosystem that will aggregate, access, and
archive research and data, helping faculty and graduate students place their research online and
raise their own as well as their institution's profile.
Grush: The metaphor you're suggesting, then, would be a global digital research infrastructure
ecosystem?
Uzwyshyn: Yes, and it's currently very useful.
Grush: What are a few of the components of a digital research infrastructure ecosystem? Maybe
you could mention examples from your work at Texas State.
5
Digital research infrastructure ecosystem components (Image courtesy Texas State University Libraries)
Uzwyshyn: Any digital research infrastructure has two central components: an online institutional
digital collections repository and an online institutional research data repository. At Texas State we
use DSpace for the first and Harvard University's Dataverse for the second. DSpace is a digital
repository for academic research, focused on text-based material such as research articles, paper
preprints, and even field notes. The online research data repository we use, Dataverse, is an
integral component that allows researchers to aggregate, organize, and archive their data, and put
it out there for sharing in an online framework. These two central components open the doors for
collaboration and provide avenues for verification of data and research results through a
connection to the larger expertise of a networked academic community.
You're "mixing and matching" pieces for your particular
institution. Each institution will have its own set of
needs and priorities when it comes to creating such
digital research infrastructures.
Beyond that, there are a few other components worth highlighting. One would be a researcher
identity management system. We use ORCiD to disambiguate academic researchers' names
primarily but also to help organize and access the research corpus of either beginning graduate
students' work or the larger corpus of senior faculty members. ORCiD vastly improves authority
control along with findability and access.
Texas
State University Libraries
Digital Scholarship
Research
Ecosystem
Identity Management System VIREO
atave
,o
seJ
□
□
o
□
Electronic
Theses
and
Dissertation
(ETD)
Online R search Data Repository
D P E
Online lnstitutiona I
Digital Collections Repository
Management
System
or
ck.a
.net
6
We also have, within this system, a graduate research component for which we use Vireo. From the
beginning of a graduate student's academic work life, there needs to be dissemination and a
trajectory for their work. Junior faculty and graduate students in particular, encounter often-
vociferous competition. It's important for these beginning researchers to get their dissertations,
theses, and first published papers "out there" and noticed.
There are other components, but certainly, the ones I just mentioned — the online institutional
digital collections repository, the online institutional research data repository, an identity
management system, and the graduate research component — are the most important for
establishing a digital research infrastructure strategy for an institution. The growth of our system
has also been phenomenal during this implementation (see Table 1).
Table 1: Texas State University Digital Scholarship Ecosystem Annual Growth
Grush: It seems that some of these components already exist in some form on our campuses. Or
they may be available as open source.
Uzwyshyn: Yes, you usually wouldn't build this type of infrastructure from scratch. Different
institutions will be on different levels when it comes to utilizing existing and available or open
source resources. You're "mixing and matching" pieces for your particular institution. Each
institution will have its own set of needs and priorities when it comes to creating such digital
research infrastructures.
Given existing open source tools, institutions globally
should consider opportunities to enable their faculty
and graduate students on these new paradigm research
ecosystem levels.
Sy
stem
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Downloads
DSpace
318
,7
42
385
,
163
34
1
,22
4
972
,
359
1,
01
0
,349
£ID
s
158,240
2
00
,373
328
,4
20 47
0,43
7 505,
658
Dat.averse
··
a n/a 4
55
3,451
2,
043
Items
DSpace
1,43
7 1,
546
1,
600
2,
135
2) 20
£ID
s 1,174 1,
326
1
,581
1
,7
89
2,
218
Dataverse n:a
rua
28
33
-3
ORCIDID
s
ORCID
190
316
43S
545
669
Ho
s
tM
Journals
OJS
1 2 2 3 4
7
And with open source, institutions can customize solutions using the APIs from interoperable
software components, opening the potential for networked effects such as collaboration and data
sharing.
Grush: So suddenly, many researchers in that 90 percent we were talking about are no longer
hidden in the shadows; instead, they are collaborating with other researchers on a global stage.
That's likely where the real power of this strategy will ultimately be.
Uzwyshyn: Yes.
Grush: Given the networked effects, what are the possibilities for consortial research
infrastructure efforts that can improve opportunities for their members?
Uzwyshyn: The possibilities are rich. Digital research infrastructure projects will ultimately result
in interdisciplinary research collaborations that have far-reaching benefits and can move the 21st
century forward with regards to medical, humanities, social science, technological, and social
justice research. Given existing open source tools, institutions globally should consider
opportunities to enable their faculty and graduate students on these new paradigm research
ecosystem levels.
Figure 2 Digital Scholarly Ecosystem Growth with Compatibly Communication Components
About the Author: Mary Grush is Editor and Conference Program Director, Campus Technology.
Ray Uzwyshyn, Ph.D. MBA MLIS is currently Director of Collections and Digital Services for
Texas State University Libraries. More information based on some of the ideas discussed in this
interview is available in this article here and presentation here.
© 2001-2020 1105 Media Inc, Ed-Tech Group
Va
lue
Fo
r
User
The Systemic Value
of
Compatibly
communicating
components
grows
as
the
square
of
their
number
increases.
'
urnbcr
o
U'I.C&'