Technical ReportPDF Available

Joel Klenck, Archaeological Discoveries on Mount Ararat Confront Attacks and Bias

Authors:

Abstract

Archaeologist Joel Klenck reports ancient sites on Mount Ararat in Turkey are being defamed and archaeologists harassed because of an alleged association with Noah’s ark.
10/13/2020 Archaeological Discoveries on Mount Ararat Confront Attacks and Bias | Dec 21, 2011 - ReleaseWire
www.sbwire.com/press-releases/release-119535.htm 1/2
Sign Up LoginOur Service Plans & Pricing Newsroom Help About
Email Alerts | RSS
Archaeologist reports ancient sites on Mount Ararat in Turkey are being defamed and archaeologists harassed because of
an alleged association with Noah’s ark.
Miami, FL -- (SBWIRE) -- 12/21/2011 -- In November of 2011, Harvard University educated archaeologist and director of the
Paleontological Research Corporation, Dr. Joel Klenck, reported there was archaeological merit to a large wood structure
and cave discovered near the summit of Mount Ararat by a Kurdish guide, Ahmet Ertugrul. In 2010, Oktay Belli, Professor of
Eurasian Archaeology at Istanbul University, hailed the nds as the “greatest discovery.” However, Klenck warns these
archaeological sites confront severe attacks and bias.
Klenck states a small tourism company in eastern Turkey, Murat Camping, acquired hundreds of thousands of dollars from
groups searching for Noah’s ark and is trying to discredit and harass those supporting research at archaeological sites on
Mount Ararat. He notes, “Murat Camping and ark enthusiasts led by this organization have falsely reported that the Ararat
sites are a hoax and that Professor Belli and Turkish government ocials are supporting a fraud.” Klenck counters these
allegations are untrue as the research area on Mount Ararat comprises “factual archaeological sites.” He states, “Once the
Ararat sites become state-approved excavations in Turkey, many can volunteer to work at the Ararat locales or study the
artifacts in museums or archaeological journals. Murat Camping stands to lose signicant monies.”
“Several groups of ark enthusiasts are also trying to disparage the sites,” Klenck states, “because they assumed that Noah’s
ark would have dinosaur bones, Early Stone Age tools, Neanderthals, be completely fossilized or had other expectations.
That the large wood structure on Mount Ararat exhibits an assemblage that appears mostly from the Late Epipaleolithic
Period (13,100-9,600 B.C.) is troubling to some since the data contradicts their views and beliefs.”
Further, he states some professional archaeologists have followed the critiques of ark enthusiasts and have ignored the
Ararat discoveries.
Klenck notes, “Professional archaeologists do not realize that the biggest critics of the Ararat sites either object to the
scientic discipline of archaeology, acquire monies from meritless ark expeditions, or both.”
Klenck remarks, “With the Ararat discoveries, we have well preserved archaeological sites and assemblages from a period
associated with the transition to farming, plant and animal domestication and stratied societies.” He concludes that
although the association of the wood structure with Noah’s ark will remain a contentious issue, the archaeological sites on
Mount Ararat are factual, require intensive research and represent discoveries that are important to our knowledge of
prehistory.
Joel Klenck
Paleontological Research Corporation
786-277-4844
Email | Web | Prole
   
10/13/2020 Archaeological Discoveries on Mount Ararat Confront Attacks and Bias | Dec 21, 2011 - ReleaseWire
www.sbwire.com/press-releases/release-119535.htm 2/2
Source: PRC, Inc.
Posted Wednesday, December 21, 2011 at 11:21 AM CST - Permalink
For information regarding the content of this press release please contact the media relations contact listed above directly.
Security Policy | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Report Abuse
Copyright © 2005 - 2020 - SBWire, a service of ReleaseWire LLC
All Rights Reserved - Important Disclaimer
Customer Support
Knowledgebase
Submit a ticket
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any references for this publication.