Arias Montano’s natural philosophical legacy was not without its devoted followers and powerful detractors. Two disciples in particular shaped his legacy, fray José de Sigüenza and Pedro de Valencia. A study of Sigüenza’s own sermons and his re-interpretation of certain passages of the magnum opus in his Historia del rey de los reyes, as well as the correspondence between Sigüenza and Valencia on
... [Show full abstract] the subject of Arias Montano’s natural philosophy, highlight the difficulties even his disciples faced when interpreting Montanian natural philosophical proposals. A previously unstudied manuscript sent by an unknown author to Pedro de Valencia concerning Arias Montano’s interpretations of Genesis 1 further reveals the type of questions someone versed in Scholastic Aristotelianism faced when approaching the Montanian opus. The chapter concludes by examining how a contemporary biblical scholar, Tomás Maluenda, engaged with the Anima and the Corpus.