ArticlePDF Available

Abstract

Psychological flexibility is the tendency to respond to situations in ways that facilitate valued goal pursuit. Psychological flexibility is particularly useful when challenges arise during goal pursuit that produce distress. In acceptance and commitment therapy, psychological flexibility is considered the pinnacle of emotional health and well-being. A growing body of research demonstrates that psychological flexibility leads to psychological benefits and adaptive behavior change. Yet, much of what we know, or think we know, about psychological flexibility hinges on a single measurement approach using the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire (AAQ and AAQ-II). Research suggests the AAQ-II is highly correlated with distress itself rather than flexible responses to distress. Existing approaches that assess psychological flexibility ignore the context in which flexibility matters most: the pursuit of valued goals. Below, we review theory and research on psychological flexibility, including its associations with healthy functioning, its measurement, and its overlap with related constructs. We discuss how gaps between theory and measurement impede our understanding and review promising evidence for a new measure of psychological flexibility. We provide new research directions in an effort to create a more generalizable foundation of knowledge. Soc Personal Psychol Compass. 2020;e12566. wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/spc3
Received: 8 June 2020
-
Revised: 23 August 2020
-
Accepted: 4 September 2020
DOI: 10.1111/spc3.12566
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Psychological flexibility: What we know, what
we do not know, and what we think we know
James D. Doorley
1
|Fallon R. Goodman
2
|Kerry C. Kelso
1
|
Todd B. Kashdan
1
1
Department of Psychology, George Mason
University, Fairfax, Virginia, USA
2
Department of Psychology, University of
South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA
Correspondence
James D. Doorley, Department of
Psychology, George Mason University, Mail
Stop 3F5, Fairfax, VA 22030, USA.
Email: jdoorley@gmu.edu
Abstract
Psychological flexibility is the tendency to respond to
situations in ways that facilitate valued goal pursuit.
Psychological flexibility is particularly useful when chal-
lenges arise during goal pursuit that produce distress. In
acceptance and commitment therapy, psychological flexi-
bility is considered the pinnacle of emotional health and
wellbeing. A growing body of research demonstrates that
psychological flexibility leads to psychological benefits and
adaptive behavior change. Yet, much of what we know, or
think we know, about psychological flexibility hinges on a
single measurement approach using the Acceptance and
Action Questionnaire (AAQ and AAQII). Research sug-
gests the AAQII is highly correlated with distress itself
rather than flexible responses to distress. Existing ap-
proaches that assess psychological flexibility ignore the
context in which flexibility matters most: the pursuit of
valued goals. Below, we review theory and research on
psychological flexibility, including its associations with
healthy functioning, its measurement, and its overlap with
related constructs. We discuss how gaps between theory
and measurement impede our understanding and review
promising evidence for a new measure of psychological
flexibility. We provide new research directions in an effort
to create a more generalizable foundation of knowledge.
Soc Personal Psychol Compass. 2020;e12566. wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/spc3 © 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
-
1 of 11
https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12566
1
|
INTRODUCTION
Psychological science, at its best, gives us a roadmap for responding to life's challenges: navigating relationships,
organizing ourselves in groups, learning and working effectively, and combating injustice. After decades and bil-
lions of dollars spent, perhaps our best answer is, “it depends.” Effective responses to life's challenges vary
depending on fluctuating situational contingencies, including our goals, and can be easily thwarted by distress.
Recently, theorists have attempted to synthesize existing literature on optimal stress responses to build contextual
models of emotion regulation. Instead of identifying a single optimal regulatory strategy across space and time,
these new frameworks—primarily rooted in social psychological research on emotion regulation and clinical
psychological research on acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT)—outline optimal responses to distress in the
context of meaningful goal pursuit.
Within these frameworks, life's challenges and resulting distress are not the primary obstacles to wellbeing;
instead, a focus on escaping these experiences prohibits valuesbased activity and diminishes wellbeing over time.
When we feel anxious about starting an important project, we scroll through social media. When we feel sad or
lonely, we comfort ourselves with excessive food, alcohol, or other substances. When we feel regret, we spend
hours mulling over the past, failing to connect with the world around us. Too often, our strategies to cope with life's
challenges, while providing momentary relief, bring us further away from the life we want. Flexible responses to
these challenges are essential for promoting longterm wellbeing.
2
|
UNDERSTANDING PSYCHOLOGICAL FLEXIBILITY AND ITS ROLE IN
HEALTHY FUNCTIONING
We operationalize psychological flexibility as the tendency to respond to situations in ways that facilitate valued goal
pursuit, and we argue that psychological flexibility is most important in situations that are challenging and provoke
distress. This definition captures Hayes et al. (2004a) and Hayes, Strosahl, Bunting, Twohig, & Wilson (2004b, p. 15)
original conceptualization of psychological flexibility as “the ability to change or persist with functional behavioral
classes when doing so serves valued ends” while focusing on the specific contexts in which being flexible is crucial for
healthy functioning: challenging situations that would otherwise disrupt valued living. Consistent with psychological
flexibility theory (Hayes et al., 2004a,2004b), this framework does not assume that reducing distress is the desired
outcome of a regulatory response. Reducing distress is only functional to the extent that doing so facilitates the pursuit
of selfendorsed, meaningful, valued goals. Research on psychological flexibility and related constructs has increased
exponentially in recent years, pointing to the central role of psychological flexibility in healthy functioning.
To date, most research on psychological flexibility has been conducted in the context of ACT. Although psy-
chological flexibility is at the core of ACT theory and psychotherapeutic interventions, the majority of this research
explores the opposite of psychological flexibility: psychological inflexibility. Psychological inflexibility is associated
with a staggering number of constructs including, but not limited to, depression, anxiety, stress, substance abuse,
negative body image, disordered eating, pain catastrophizing, thought suppression, job burnout, and work absen-
teeism (e.g., Bluett et al., 2016; Bond et al., 2011; de Boer, Steinhagen, Versteegen, Struys, & Sanderman, 2014;
Lloyd, Bond, & Flaxman, 2013; Luoma, Drake, Kohlenberg, & Hayes, 2011). This focus on inflexibility rather than
flexibility is perhaps not surprising—clinical psychology has a long history of research on symptoms, syndromes, and
deficits, and most psychotherapies are designed to alleviate distress. While studies on the benefits of high psy-
chological flexibility are less abundant, data point to positive associations between psychological flexibility and self
compassion, job performance and satisfaction, and overall wellbeing (e.g., Bond, Hayes, & BarnesHolmes, 2006;
Kashdan & Rottenberg, 2010; Yadavaia, Hayes, & Vilardaga, 2014).
ACT outcome studies and clinical trials also point to the benefits of psychological flexibility. These studies
suggest that ACT is an effective treatment for numerous presenting problems, including depression, chronic pain,
2 of 11
-
DOORLEY ET AL.
anxiety, posttraumatic stress disorder, obsessivecompulsive disorder, trichotillomania, psychosis, and substance
use (e.g., Arch et al., 2012; Gaudiano & Herbert, 2006; Hann & McCracken, 2014; Lee, An, Levin, & Twohig, 2015;
Lee et al., 2020; Twohig et al., 2010; Zettle, Rains, & Hayes, 2011). Several metaanalyses suggest that, across
dozens of studies and hundreds of patients, ACT is more effective than waitlist and placebo conditions and at least
as effective as goldstandard cognitive behavioral interventions (e.g., Atjak et al., 2015; Jiménez, 2012; Levin,
Hildebrandt, Lillis, & Hayes, 2012; Powers, Vörding, & Emmelkamp, 2009). Importantly, ACT and similar mindful-
ness and acceptancebased interventions produce therapeutic change through psychological flexibility, their
theoretically proposed mechanism of action (Jiménez, 2012; Levin et al., 2012).
The data are promising. Yet there is a notsohidden problem in this large body of work. Nearly the entire
literature on the effectiveness of ACT interventions and the causes and consequences of psychological flexibility
hinge on the use of a single measure, the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire (AAQI and II), which has significant
limitations (e.g., Rochefort, Baldwin, & Chmielewski, 2018; Tyndall et al., 2019; Wolgast, 2014). In addition to
reliance on one measure, a lack of conceptual clarity furthers muddy our understanding of psychological flexibility.
We must define what psychological flexibility is and is not in order to accurately assess its role in our lives. To do so,
we must move beyond a narrow focus on clinical psychological literature (primarily ACTbased intervention work)
and examine the broader landscape of social psychology and personality theory to integrate constructs similar to
yet distinct from psychological flexibility.
3
|
DISENTANGLING PSYCHOLOGICAL FLEXIBILITY FROM RELATED CONSTRUCTS
While the term “psychological flexibility” is relatively new (Hayes et al., 2004a,2004b), its origins are not (Block, 1961).
Multiple constructs describe how a person adapts their thoughts, feelings, and behaviors to a given situation and
whether their actions align with what is important to them (Aldao, Sheppes, & Gross, 2015; Duckworth, Peterson,
Matthews, & Kelly, 2007; Kashdan & Rottenberg, 2010; Snyder et al., 1991a). Executive functioning, for example,
entails mental processes involved in selfmanagement (Goldstein & Naglieri, 2014), including the capacity to shift back
and forth between mental sets, to inhibit impulsive responses, and to maintain and update relevant contextual in-
formation. These processes are considered essential to selfcontrol (i.e., inhibiting impulsive responses) and self
regulation (i.e., reducing discrepancies between actual and desired thoughts, feelings, and behaviors; Hofmann,
Schmeichel, & Baddeley, 2012), which are the building blocks of psychological flexibility (Kashdan & Rottenberg, 2010).
Hope is similar to psychological flexibility, capturing the belief that one can initiate effort toward goals (the agency
dimension) and if obstacles arise, consider and pursue alternatives (the pathways dimension; Snyder, Irving, &
Anderson, 1991b). Unlike psychological flexibility, hope theory does not specifically focus on uncomfortable emotions
and other forms of distress as barriers to valued goal pursuit. Grit entails passionate interest in and persistence to-
wards longterm goals (Duckworth et al., 2007), but time spent working towards a goal is not necessarily correlated
with its perceived importance. The Grit Scale prompts respondents to think about “a goal that took years of work”
(Duckworth et al., 2007). While longterm goals are often important, unimportant goals often take a long time. A
person may spend years working towards a goal, such as paying off exorbitant student loans, but “being debt free” may
not deeply matter to them. Grit is sometimes described as entailing “passion” for goals, although the original and
shortened grit scales appear to measure longterm consistency of interests in a goal (e.g., “New ideas and projects
sometimes distract me from previous ones” [reversedscored]) rather than passion (Duckworth et al., 2007; Duckworth &
Quinn, 2009). Taken together, the above constructs are related but distinct from psychological flexibility because they
do not describe how a person flexibly responds to emotional experiences in service of valued goals.
Psychological flexibility draws from social psychological research on emotion regulation. A prevailing
assumption in this work is that people are motivated to feel less negative and more positive emotions (e.g., Tice,
Baumeister, & Zhang, 2004). While this is often true (e.g., Riediger, Schmiedek, Wagner, & Lindenberger, 2009),
there are certain contexts in which people might have stronger preferences for negative emotions (e.g., anger
DOORLEY ET AL.
-
3 of 11
before a negotiation: Tamir, Ford, & Ryan, 2013). Moreover, people may not regulate their emotions only to obtain
a particular emotional state (i.e., hedonic motives); they may pursue this emotional state in service of another
superordinate goal (i.e., instrumental motives; Tamir, 2016). For example, an athlete may upregulate feelings of anger
or an uncomfortable desire to seek revenge in order to enhance motivation and arousal prior to competition. In this
situation, her primary goal is not to feel particular emotions; her primary goal is to harness whatever emotions she
believes are necessary to achieve her goal. The logic underlying psychological flexibility is similar: emotion regu-
lation strategies are adaptive to the extent that they facilitate pursuit of valued goals. Unfortunately, existing
psychological flexibility measures fail to map onto this rich theory, as they do not capture the instrumental use of
psychological distress for valued goal achievement (i.e., harnessing). They also ignore the specific, valued goals of
respondents, which provide the very context for why people are willing to be flexible in the face of distress (Hayes,
Strosahl, & Wilson, 2011a; Hayes, Villatte, Levin, & Hildebrandt, 2011b).
4
|
WHAT WE KNOW ABOUT PSYCHOLOGICAL FLEXIBILITY HINGES ON
FAULTY MEASUREMENT
Psychological flexibility is plagued by faulty measurement (e.g., Chawla & Ostafin, 2007; Rochefort et al., 2018;
Tyndall, et al., 2019; Wolgast, 2014). The original AAQI (Hayes et al., 2004a,2004b) was designed to measure
experiential avoidance (EA), defined as an unwillingness to remain in contact with aversive internal experiences
(e.g., thoughts, memories, bodily sensations). The AAQI items capture several constructs similar to and distinct
from this definition of EA, including thought suppression (e.g., “I try to suppress thoughts and feelings that I don't like by
just not thinking about them”), broad functional impairment instead of impaired values pursuit (e.g., “When I feel
depressed or anxious, I am unable to take care of my responsibilities”), and beliefs about emotions (e.g., “anxiety is bad”).
Each of these constructs has been operationalized with their own validated measures (e.g., Tsai & Knutson, 2006;
Ware, Kosinski, & Keller, 2001; Wegner & Zanakos, 1994). Despite its many facets, the AAQ1 is scored with a
single total score, which may account for its modest internal consistency (e.g., αs<0.50; Zvolensky, Feldner, Leen
Feldner, & Yartz, 2005). Further, data suggest that the AAQI measures a construct more similar to negative
emotionality than a person's response to negative emotionality (Chawla & Ostafin, 2007; Zvolensky et al., 2005).
The revised AAQII emerged in response to these criticisms but has similar problems. Item content is still
conflated with broad functional impairment (e.g., “Emotions cause problems in my life,” “It seems like most people are
handling their lives better than I am”). The AAQII has demonstrated validity problems, including high correlations
with measures of psychological distress (e.g., 0.70–0.71 correlations between the AAQII and the Beck Depression
Inventory (BDI); Bond et al., 2011; Rochefort et al., 2018; Tyndall et al., 2019; Wolgast, 2014). It is no wonder that
the AAQII correlates with nearly every manifestation of psychopathology (Bond et al., 2011).
Valued goals are integral to the definition of psychological flexibility. Hayes et al. (2011a,2011b) define
psychological flexibility as flexible contact with the present moment while acting in the service of chosen values.
Existing psychological flexibility measures may mention values abstractly but do not assess responses to distress in
the context of valued goal pursuit. For instance, two AAQII items reference valued living either in a hypothetical,
futureoriented manner (“my painful experiences and memories make it difficult for me to live a life that I would value”) or
broadly construe it as a “meaningful life” (“my painful memories prevent me from having a meaningful life”; Bond et al.,
2011), which includes other components in addition to values (Krause & Hayward, 2014). Values are treated with
similar abstraction in new measures of psychological flexibility, including the comprehensive assessment of
acceptance and commitment therapy (e.g., “My values are really reflected in my behavior”; Francis, Dawson, & Golijani
Moghaddam, 2016) and the Multidimensional Psychological Flexibility Inventory (e.g., “Negative experiences derailed
me from what's really important;” Roffs, Rogge, & Wilson, 2018).
It is worth contemplating the mental burden placed on participants to calculate the contribution of past painful
memories to a hypothetical future (as with the AAQII). We know from existing field and laboratory studies that
4 of 11
-
DOORLEY ET AL.
humans are exceptionally poor at predicting the valence, quality, and duration of upcoming psychological experi-
ences (e.g., Wilson & Gilbert, 2005). These types of items decrease the probability that measures are capturing the
intended construct. Further, none of these scales incorporate aspects of instrumental emotion regulation (Tamir,
2016; Tamir et al., 2013), representing the use of emotions as tools for obtaining desired ends.
Researchers have attempted to broaden the scope of psychological flexibility measures by creating population/
disorder specific versions of the AAQII, of which there are now at least 20 (e.g., for the workplace, tinnitus, irritable
bowel syndrome, exercise, and epilepsy). While a review of disorderspecific AAQII variants points to favorable
incremental validity beyond the general AAQII in their designated focus areas (Ong, Lee, Levin, & Twohig, 2019),
authors also note that the often inadequate attempts at scale validation. As a range of nonclinicians recognize the
importance of psychological flexibility (e.g., businesspeople, educators, athletes, medical professionals, and the
general public), creating a different measure of psychological flexibility for every relevant group is not only
unsustainable, but further hinders conceptual clarity and generalizability across disciplines. Consistent with the
construct itself, psychological flexibility measures must be designed with flexibility in mind in order to facilitate
reliable use across a diverse set of contexts and populations.
5
|
THE PERSONALIZED PSYCHOLOGICAL FLEXIBILITY INDEX
Attempting to address these gaps, we created the Personalized Psychological Flexibility Index (PPFI; Kashdan,
Disabato, Goodman, Doorley, & McKnight, 2020). Rather than measuring distress itself or vague consequences of
negative emotions (e.g., “Emotions cause problems in my life;” Bond et al., 2011), the PPFI asks respondents to think
about a presently important goal and answer questions about how they respond to the distress that arises while
pursuing this goal (cf. Feldman, Rand, & KahleWrobleski, 2009). When creating the PPFI items, we sought to
capture flexible responses to distress that are central to early psychological flexibility conceptualizations: avoid-
ance and acceptance of distress. We also drew from emotion regulation literature to capture active engagement
with distress as a means to facilitate goal pursuit: harnessing. We conceptualize harnessing as using distress
instrumentally to stay focused, motivated, and energized while pursuing important life aims.
Consider the value of harnessing in the following scenario. A job applicant feels anxious three weeks prior to an
interview for his dream position. He can avoid this anxiety, and in doing so, ignore necessary preparation and
decrease his chances of success. He can accept this anxiety and, remembering how much he wants the job, trudge
ahead with preparation despite discomfort (in line with traditional psychological flexibility conceptualizations;
Hayes et al., 2011a,2011b). But better still, he can use this anxiety to amplify his goal pursuit. Moderate levels of
anxiety might help him attend to important details in researching the new position, combat inactivity, and stay
mentally engaged during a taxing day of interviews. After all, moderate emotional/physiological arousal (compared
to none) facilitates task performance in a range of contexts (e.g., Anderson, 1994; Waters et al., 1997). If we cannot
control the presence of negative emotions and other potential barriers to goal pursuit, perhaps the best we can do
is creatively use them to our advantage.
Preliminary evidence shows that the PPFI total and subscale scores (avoidance, acceptance, and harnessing)
predict conscientiousness, grit, distress tolerance, subjective happiness, life satisfaction, purpose and meaning in
life, psychological needs satisfaction, depression, generalized anxiety, and social anxiety (Kashdan et al., 2020).
Compared to the AAQII and Brief Experiential Avoidance Questionnaire (BEAQ), the PPFI is a stronger predictor
of outcomes central to psychological flexibility theory. This includes effective daily goal pursuit (e.g., effort and
success, pursuing daily goals closely aligned with one's purpose in life), effective pursuit of broader personal
strivings (e.g., feelings of competence, joy, and meaning while pursuing strivings; e.g., Emmons, 1986; Little, 1989),
and wideranging emotion regulation strategy use in response to daily stressors (e.g., reappraisal, perspective
taking, problem solving, and benefit finding).
DOORLEY ET AL.
-
5 of 11
In contrast to the AAQII, several analyses demonstrate that the PPFI is not conflated with negative
emotionality. First, correlations between the PPFI and psychopathology were moderate. Second, multilevel models
containing both the AAQII and PPFI revealed only the AAQII predicted unique variance in daily negative emo-
tions. Third, an exploratory factor analysis demonstrated that the PPFI subscales load onto their own factor,
separate from a second factor that contained negative emotionality (e.g., neuroticism, negative affect, and
depression), the AAQII, and the BEAQ (Kashdan et al., 2020).
Preliminary results for the PPFI are promising, but potential limitations are worth noting. Since psychological
flexibility scores are tied to idiographic goals, researchers must be careful about generalizing across populations
and goal content. The nature and prioritization of a person's goals may change over time, leading to more unstable
psychological flexibility scores over longer time frames (which will differ from the test–retest correlations and
trajectories of traditional personality assessments). Goals can be expected to vary substantially between people as
well, and this variance may contribute to observed differences in PPFI scores. Goal fluidity and heterogeneity may
provide promising new avenues for research, however. With idiographic measures like the PPFI, new questions can
be asked about the value of goal consistency over time and in specific life circumstances or transitions (e.g., Sheldon
& Kasser, 1995,2001) and whether the nature/quality of goals can facilitate or hinder psychological flexibility
(specific vs. vague, long vs. shortterm, and self vs. otheroriented). More research is needed to fully understand the
value of integrating qualitative and quantitative approaches into measurement, areas for refinement, and appli-
cations to clinical, social, occupational, developmental, crosscultural, and other contexts.
6
|
FUTURE DIRECTIONS FOR THE STUDY OF PSYCHOLOGICAL FLEXIBILITY
We believe the PPFI represents a promising step forward, but there is plenty of work to do. We are creating a
revised PPFI that goes beyond linking each item to a person's idiographic goals. In this next iteration, participants
endorse their most important values and rate their idiographic goal in terms of these values. We are testing
algorithms to determine how much a person is being flexible in response to distress in the pursuit of deeply valued
goals (i.e., weighting total scores based on valuegoal congruence). Perhaps psychological flexibility is more
beneficial when there is greater harmony between values and chosen goals. The content of values may also be
important (e.g., What are the consequences of flexibly responding to goalrelated distress in the service of power or
achievementbased values compared to values related to equality or security?).
Only recently has research examined the utility of emotions to facilitate goal pursuit. The PPFI harnessing sub-
scale predicted greater daily goal difficulty, goal effort, and a wider range of daily emotion regulation strategies than
avoidance and acceptance subscales (Kashdan et al., 2020). Perhaps high harnessing scorers are more skilled at
choosing functional regulatory strategies based on dynamic situational contingencies. Indeed, research shows that
expressive suppression, often considered a “maladaptive” strategy, is beneficial in certain contexts (e.g., Burton &
Bonanno, 2016). While a small literature supports the benefits of harnessing (e.g., Tamir, Mitchell, & Gross, 2008;
Tamir & Ford, 2009), we know little about individual differences that explain why people are more or less inclined to
harness. People do not simply experience emotions; they have personality traits (e.g., Eldesouky & English, 2019),
certain beliefs about emotions (e.g., Kneeland, Goodman, & Dovidio, 2020), and emotional sensitivities (e.g., McHugh,
Reynolds, Leyro, & Otto, 2013) that influence how they respond to different emotional experiences. More research is
needed on the antecedents, interpersonal consequences, and momentary use of harnessing during goal pursuit.
Psychological flexibility involves choosing appropriate selfregulatory strategies for a given context. The
implications of psychological flexibility for functioning in social interactions, however, remain poorly understood.
This is disconcerting given that social interactions are omnipresent for humans. Theory suggests people high on
emotion regulation flexibility are wellattuned to social cues in choosing regulatory strategies (e.g., Bonanno &
Burton, 2013). In contrast, people with high social anxiety, who are often socially impaired (e.g., Kashdan & Wenzel,
2005; Rodebaugh et al., 2014), show signs of inflexible emotion regulation—overrelying and placing considerable
6 of 11
-
DOORLEY ET AL.
value on controlling, avoidance, and concealing their emotions regardless of situational cues (Daniel et al., in press;
Dryman & Heimberg, 2018; Goodman, Kashdan, & İmamoğlu, in press; Goodman, Kashdan, Stiksma, & Blalock,
2019; O'Toole, Zachariae, & Mennin, 2017). There is reason to believe psychological flexibility and social func-
tioning covary, but causal links are unclear. Perhaps psychological flexibility and social skills are both influenced by
other variables such as cognitive and attentional flexibility or reward and punishment sensitivities. In theory,
psychologically flexible people should skillfully manage the intricacies, uncertainties, and emotional challenges of
socializing. Researchers can explore links among psychological flexibility, emotional/social intelligence, wisdom, as
well as how psychologically flexible people perform through the lens of other people and objective metrics.
Intrapersonal phenomena, including psychological flexibility, are insufficiently explored interpersonally. What is
it like to be in a romantic relationship with a psychologically flexible partner? Work for a psychologically inflexible
employer? What happens when your best friend's psychological flexibility levels are one standard deviation below
your own? What do the social networks of highly psychologically flexible people look like and how do they differ
from the average person? We are beginning to learn more about the interpersonal consequences of psychological
phenomena that explicitly involve other people, such as social anxiety (e.g., Kashdan, Volkmann, Breen, & Han,
2007; Stevens & Morris, 2007; Van Zalk, Van Zalk, Kerr, & Stattin, 2011), but more work must be done to un-
derstand the social implications of psychological flexibility. Psychological flexibility can build off and extend new
models in affective science that detail how and why emotion regulation is an interpersonal process that must be
studied accordingly (Zaki & Williams, 2013). Beyond studying psychological flexibility within an interpersonal
framework, future research can examine how psychological flexibility influences distress in the context of re-
lationships and discrete social interactions (e.g., Hofmann, 2014). Researchers must explore these questions if we
wish to expand the nomological network of psychological flexibility into the social realm.
One way to understand the interpersonal processes related to psychological flexibility is to diversify measure-
ment approaches. Ecologically valid methods, such as experiencesampling, facilitate the study of psychological
flexibility in social situations and other contexts. Psychological flexibility is most frequently explored as an outcome or
mechanism of action in clinical treatment (e.g., with the AAQ) rather than a component of daily life. Experience
sampling may be superior to trait measures because psychological flexibility is, by definition, dynamic (e.g., based on
what a given situation affords, either persisting or changing in behaviors in the service of chosen values; Hayes et al.,
2011a,2011b). For example, research using the day reconstruction method (Kahneman, Krueger, Schkade, Schwarz, &
Stone, 2004) suggests psychological flexibility is associated with a wider range of daily emotion regulation strategies
and greater daily goalrelated difficulty, progress, effort, joy, and meaning (Kashdan et al., 2020).
Future research can expand upon this work by exploring interactions between daily situations and chosen
regulatory strategies to test whether psychological flexibility entails better selfregulation in response to a
changing environment. Experiencesampling is ideal for exploring the degree to which daily behaviors, such as
coping strategies or communication patterns, facilitate valued living (often termed “workability”; Harris, 2019).
Creating validated momentary measures of psychological flexibility is a promising next step to facilitate this work.
While research suggests stable individual differences, psychological flexibility, like other traits, likely varies within
people from day to day or even moment to moment. Perhaps levels of momentary psychological flexibility depend
on the salience of chosen goals or values in a given situation. Maybe psychological flexibility is more predictive of
goal achievement and sense of meaning in life in certain daily contexts compared to others (e.g., when experiencing
low mood, surrounded by people with high psychological flexibility, or facing a goalrelated challenge).
7
|
CONCLUSION
As interest in psychological flexibility grows, we must take stock of what is known, what is misunderstood, and how
to move forward. Psychological flexibility has roots in social psychology (e.g., selfcontrol, hope theory, and emotion
regulation), but since this term first appeared in the clinical literature (Hayes et al., 2004a,2004b), it has been
DOORLEY ET AL.
-
7 of 11
researched predominantly therein. We know that treatments targeting psychological flexibility (ACT, primarily) are
effective in enhancing mental health and wellbeing. Although, unlike virtually any other psychological construct,
psychological flexibility is recognized almost exclusively within a single therapeutic intervention. The potential for
psychological flexibility is far greater. To demonstrate this potential to other fields, we must conceptualize and
measure psychological flexibility in ways that facilitate widespread adoption. This starts with valid measures that
assess a wide spectrum of flexible responses and capture flexibility in the context of values and valued goals. With
new measurement approaches, the time is ripe to extend and bolster research on psychological flexibility in social
and personality psychology and beyond.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
We have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
ORCID
Kerry C. Kelso https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3286-2823
Todd B. Kashdan https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6438-0485
REFERENCES
Aldao, A., Sheppes, G., & Gross, J. J. (2015). Emotion regulation flexibility. Cognitive Therapy and Research,39(3), 263–278.
Anderson, K. J. (1994). Impulsivity, caffeine, and task difficulty: A withinsubjects test of the YerkesDodson law. Personality
and Individual Differences,16, 813–829.
Arch, J. J., Eifert, G. H., Davies, C., Vilardaga, J. C. P., Rose, R. D., & Craske, M. G. (2012). Randomized clinical trial of
cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) versus acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) for mixed anxiety disorders.
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,80, 750–765.
Atjak, J. G., Davis, M. L., Morina, N., Powers, M. B., Smits, J. A., & Emmelkamp, P. M. (2015). A metaanalysis of the efficacy
of acceptance and commitment therapy for clinically relevant mental and physical health problems. Psychotherapy and
Psychosomatics,84, 30–36.
Block, J. (1961). Ego identity, role variability, and adjustment. Journal of Consulting Psychology,25(5), 392–397.
Bluett, E. J., Lee, E. B., Simone, M., Lockhart, G., Twohig, M. P., LensegravBenson, T., & QuakenbushRoberts, B. (2016). The
role of body image psychological flexibility on the treatment of eating disorders in a residential facility. Eating Be-
haviors,23, 150–155.
Bonanno, G. A., & Burton, C. L. (2013). Regulatory flexibility: An individual differences perspective on coping and emotion
regulation. Perspectives on Psychological Science,8(6), 591–612.
Bond, F. W., Hayes, S. C., & BarnesHolmes, D. (2006). Psychological flexibility, ACT, and organizational behavior. Journal of
Organizational Behavior Management,26, 25–54.
Bond, F. W., Hayes, S. C., Baer, R. A., Carpenter, K. M., Guenole, N., Orcutt, H. K., … Zettle, R. D. (2011). Preliminary
psychometric properties of the acceptance and action questionnaire–II: A revised measure of psychological inflexi-
bility and experiential avoidance. Behavior Therapy,42, 676–688.
Burton, C. L., & Bonanno, G. A. (2016). Measuring ability to enhance and suppress emotional expression: The Flexible
Regulation of Emotional Expression (FREE) Scale. Psychological Assessment,28, 929–941.
Chawla, N., & Ostafin, B. (2007). Experiential avoidance as a functional dimensional approach to psychopathology: An
empirical review. Journal of Clinical Psychology,63, 871–890.
Daniel, K. E., Goodman, F. R., Beltzer, M. L., Daros, A. R., Boukhechba, M., Barnes, L. E., & Teachman, B. A. (in press). Emotion
malleability beliefs and emotion experience and regulation in the daily lives of people with high trait social anxiety.
Cognitive Therapy and Research.
de Boer, M. J., Steinhagen, H. E., Versteegen, G. J., Struys, M. M. R. F., & Sanderman, R. (2014). Mindfulness, acceptance and
catastrophizing in chronic pain. PLoS One,9, e87445.
Dryman, M. T., & Heimberg, R. G. (2018). Emotion regulation in social anxiety and depression: A systematic review of
expressive suppression and cognitive reappraisal. Clinical Psychology Review,65, 17–42.
Duckworth, A. L., Peterson, C., Matthews, M. D., & Kelly, D. R. (2007). Grit: Perseverance and passion for longterm goals.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,92(6), 1087–1101.
Duckworth, A. L., & Quinn, P. D. (2009). Development and validation of the Short Grit Scale (GRIT–S). Journal of Personality
Assessment,91, 166–174.
Eldesouky, L., & English, T. (2019). Individual differences in emotion regulation goals: Does personality predict the reasons
why people regulate their emotions? Journal of Personality,87(4), 750–766.
8 of 11
-
DOORLEY ET AL.
Emmons, R. A. (1986). Personal strivings: An approach to personality and subjective wellbeing. Journal of Personality and
Social Psychology,51, 1058–1068.
Feldman, D. B., Rand, K. L., & KahleWrobleski, K. (2009). Hope and goal attainment: Testing a basic prediction of hope
theory. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology,28, 479–497.
Francis, A. W., Dawson, D. L., & GolijaniMoghaddam, N. (2016). The development and validation of the comprehensive
assessment of acceptance and commitment therapy processes (CompACT). Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science,5,
134–145.
Gaudiano, B. A., & Herbert, J. D. (2006). Acute treatment of inpatients with psychotic symptoms using Acceptance and
Commitment Therapy: Pilot results. Behaviour Research and Therapy,44, 415–437.
Goldstein, S. & Naglieri, J. A. (2014). Handbook of executive functioning. Dordrecht: Springer. Hoop.
Goodman, F. R., Kashdan, T. B., & İmamoğlu, A. (in press). Valuing emotional control in social anxiety disorder: A multi-
method study of emotion beliefs and emotion regulation. Emotion.
Goodman, F. R., Kashdan, T. B., Stiksma, M. C., & Blalock, D. V. (2019). Personal strivings to understand anxiety disorders:
Social anxiety as an exemplar. Clinical Psychological Science,7, 283–301.
Hann, K. E., & McCracken, L. M. (2014). A systematic review of randomized controlled trials of acceptance and commitment
therapy for adults with chronic pain: Outcome domains, design quality, and efficacy. Journal of Contextual Behavioral
Science,3(4), 217–227.
Harris, R. (2019). ACT made simple: An easytoread primer on acceptance and commitment therapy. Oakland, CA: New
Harbinger Publications.
Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K., Wilson, K. G., Bissett, R. T., Pistorello, J., Toarmino, D., … Stewart, S. H. (2004a). Measuring
experiential avoidance: A preliminary test of a working model. The Psychological Record,54, 553–578.
Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K. D., & Wilson, K. G. (2011a). Acceptance and commitment therapy: The process and practice of mindful
change. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K. D., Bunting, K., Twohig, M., & Wilson, K. G. (2004b). What is acceptance and commitment therapy? In
S. C. Hayes & K. D. Strosahl (Eds.), A practical guide to acceptance and commitment therapy (pp. 3–29). Boston, MA: Springer.
Hayes, S. C., Villatte, M., Levin, M., & Hildebrandt, M. (2011b). Open, aware, and active: Contextual approaches as an
emerging trend in the behavioral and cognitive therapies. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology,7, 141–168.
Hofmann, S. G. (2014). Interpersonal emotion regulation model of mood and anxiety disorders. Cognitive Therapy and
Research,38(5), 483–492.
Hofmann, W., Schmeichel, B. J., & Baddeley, A. D. (2012). Executive functions and selfregulation. Trends in Cognitive
Sciences,16(3), 174–180.
Jiménez, F. J. R. (2012). Acceptance and commitment therapy versus traditional cognitive behavioral therapy: A systematic
review and metaanalysis of current empirical evidence. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy,
12(3), 333–358.
Kahneman, D., Krueger, A. B., Schkade, D. A., Schwarz, N., & Stone, A. A. (2004). A survey method for characterizing daily
life experience: The day reconstruction method. Science,306(5702), 1776–1780.
Kashdan, T. B., Disabato, D. J., Goodman, F. R., Doorley, J. D., & McKnight, P. E. (2020). Understanding psychological
flexibility: A multimethod exploration of pursuing valued goals despite the presence of distress. Psychological
Assessment,32, 829–850.
Kashdan, T. B., & Rottenberg, J. (2010). Psychological flexibility as a fundamental aspect of health. Clinical Psychology
Review,30, 865–878.
Kashdan, T. B., Volkmann, J., Breen, W. E., & Han, S. (2007). Social anxiety and emotion regulation in romantic relationships:
The costs and benefits of negative emotion expression are contextdependent. Journal of Anxiety Disorders,21, 475–492.
Kashdan, T. B., & Wenzel, A. (2005). A transactional approach to social anxiety and the genesis of interpersonal closeness:
Self, partner, and social context. Behavior Therapy,36(4), 335–346.
Kneeland, E. T., Goodman, F. R., & Dovidio, J. F. (2020). Emotion beliefs, emotion regulation, and emotional experiences in
daily life. Behavior Therapy,51(5), 728–738.
Krause, N., & Hayward, R. D. (2014). Assessing stability and change in a secondorder confirmatory factor model of meaning
in life. Journal of Happiness Studies,15, 237–253.
Lee, E. B., An, W., Levin, M. E., & Twohig, M. P. (2015). An initial metaanalysis of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for
treating substance use disorders. Drug and Alcohol Dependence,155, 1–7.
Lee, E. B., Homan, K. J., Morrison, K. L., Ong, C. W., Levin, M. E., & Twohig, M. P. (2020). Acceptance and commitment
therapy for trichotillomania: A randomized controlled trial of adults and adolescents. Behavior Modification,44(1),
70–91.
Levin, M. E., Hildebrandt, M. J., Lillis, J., & Hayes, S. C. (2012). The impact of treatment components suggested by the psy-
chological flexibility model: A metaanalysis of laboratorybased component studies. Behavior Therapy,43(4), 741–756.
DOORLEY ET AL.
-
9 of 11
Little, B. R. (1989). Personal Projects Analysis: Trivial pursuits, magnificent obsessions and the search for coherence. In
D. M. Buss, & N. Cantor (Eds.), Personality psychology: Recent trends and emerging directions (pp. 15–31). New York, NY:
SpringerVerlag.
Lloyd, J., Bond, F. W., & Flaxman, P. E. (2013). The value of psychological flexibility: Examining psychological mechanisms
underpinning a cognitive behavioural therapy intervention for burnout. Work & Stress,27(2), 181–199.
Luoma, J., Drake, C. E., Kohlenberg, B. S., & Hayes, S. C. (2011). Substance abuse and psychological flexibility: The
development of a new measure. Addiction Research & Theory,19(1), 3–13.
McHugh, R. K., Reynolds, E. K., Leyro, T. M., & Otto, M. W. (2013). An examination of the association of distress intolerance
and emotion regulation with avoidance. Cognitive Therapy and Research,37(2), 363–367.
Ong, C. W., Lee, E. B., Levin, M. E., & Twohig, M. P. (2019). A review of AAQ variants and other contextspecific measures of
psychological flexibility. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science,12, 329–346.
O'Toole, M. S., Zachariae, R., & Mennin, D. S. (2017). Social anxiety and emotion regulation flexibility: Considering emotion
intensity and type as contextual factors. Anxiety, Stress, & Coping,30(6), 716–724.
Powers, M. B., Vörding, M. B. Z. V. S., & Emmelkamp, P. M. (2009). Acceptance and commitment therapy: A metaanalytic
review. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics,78, 73–80.
Riediger, M., Schmiedek, F., Wagner, G. G., & Lindenberger, U. (2009). Seeking pleasure and seeking pain: Differences in
prohedonic and contrahedonic motivation from adolescence to old age. Psychological Science,20, 1529–1535.
Rochefort, C., Baldwin, A. S., & Chmielewski, M. (2018). Experiential avoidance: An examination of the construct validity of
the AAQII and MEAQ. Behavior Therapy,49, 435–449.
Rodebaugh, T. L., Lim, M. H., Fernandez, K. C., Langer, J. K., Weisman, J. S., Tonge, N., … Shumaker, E. A. (2014). Self and
friend's differing views of social anxiety disorder's effects on friendships. Journal of Abnormal Psychology,123(4),
715–724.
Rolffs, J. L., Rogge, R. D., & Wilson, K. G. (2018). Disentangling components of flexibility via the hexaflex model: Development
and validation of the Multidimensional Psychological Flexibility Inventory (MPFI). Assessment,25(4), 458–482.
Sheldon, K. M., & Kasser, T. (1995). Coherence and congruence: Two aspects of personality integration. Journal of Per-
sonality and Social Psychology,68(3), 531–543.
Sheldon, K. M., & Kasser, T. (2001). Goals, congruence, and positive wellbeing: New empirical support for humanistic
theories. Journal of Humanistic Psychology,41(1), 30–50.
Snyder, C. R., Harris, C., Anderson, J. R., Holleran, S. A., Irving, L. M., Sigmon, S. T., … Harney, P. (1991a). The will and the
ways: Development and validation of an individualdifferences measure of hope. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology,60(4), 570–585.
Snyder, C. R., Irving, L. M., & Anderson, J. R. (1991b). Hope and health. Handbook of Social and Clinical Psychology: The
Health Perspective, 162, 285–305.
Stevens, S. B., & Morris, T. L. (2007). College dating and social anxiety: Using the Internet as a means of connecting to
others. CyberPsychology & Behavior,10(5), 680–688.
Tamir, M. (2016). Why do people regulate their emotions? A taxonomy of motives in emotion regulation. Personality and
Social Psychology Review,20(3), 199–222.
Tamir, M., & Ford, B. Q. (2009). Choosing to be afraid: Preferences for fear as a function of goal pursuit. Emotion,9(4), 488–497.
Tamir, M., Ford, B. Q., & Ryan, E. (2013). Nonconscious goals can shape what people want to feel. Journal of Experimental
Social Psychology,49(2), 292–297.
Tamir, M., Mitchell, C., & Gross, J. J. (2008). Hedonic and instrumental motives in anger regulation. Psychological Science,
19(4), 324–328.
Tice, D. M., Baumeister, R. F., & Zhang, L. (2004). The role of emotion in selfregulation: Differing role of positive and negative
emotions. In P. Philippot, & R. S. Feldman (Eds.), The regulation of emotion (pp. 213–226). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Tsai, J. L., Knutson, B., & Fung, H. H. (2006). Cultural variation in affect valuation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
90(2), 288–307.
Twohig, M. P., Hayes, S. C., Plumb, J. C., Pruitt, L. D., Collins, A. B., HazlettStevens, H., & Woidneck, M. R. (2010).
A randomized clinical trial of acceptance and commitment therapy versus progressive relaxation training for
obsessivecompulsive disorder. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,78(5), 705–716.
Tyndall, I., Waldeck, D., Pancani, L., Whelan, R., Roche, B., & Dawson, D. L. (2019). The Acceptance and Action Ques-
tionnaireII (AAQII) as a measure of experiential avoidance: Concerns over discriminant validity. Journal of Contextual
Behavioral Science,12, 278–284.
Van Zalk, N., Van Zalk, M., Kerr, M., & Stattin, H. (2011). Social anxiety as a basis for friendship selection and socialization in
adolescents' social networks. Journal of Personality,79(3), 499–526.
Watters, P. A., Martin, F., & Schreter, Z. (1997). Caffeine and cognitive performance: The nonlinear Yerkes–Dodson law.
Human Psychopharmacology: Clinical and Experimental,12(3), 249–257.
Ware, J. E., Kosinski, M., & Keller, S. (2001). SF36 physical and mental health summary scales: A user's manual.
10 of 11
-
DOORLEY ET AL.
Wegner, D. M., & Zanakos, S. (1994). Chronic thought suppression. Journal of Personality,62(4), 615–640.
Wilson, T. D., & Gilbert, D. T. (2005). Affective forecasting: Knowing what to want. Current Directions in Psychological Science,
14(3), 131–134.
Wolgast, M. (2014). What does the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire (AAQII) really measure? Behavior Therapy,45(6),
831–839.
Yadavaia, J. E., Hayes, S. C., & Vilardaga, R. (2014). Using acceptance and commitment therapy to increase selfcompassion:
A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science,3(4), 248–257.
Zaki, J., & Williams, W. C. (2013). Interpersonal emotion regulation. Emotion, 13(5), 803–810.
Zettle, R. D., Rains, J. C., & Hayes, S. C. (2011). Processes of change in acceptance and commitment therapy and cognitive
therapy for depression: A mediation reanalysis of Zettle and Rains. Behavior Modification,35(3), 265–283.
Zvolensky, M. J., Feldner, M. T., LeenFeldner, E. W., & Yartz, A. R. (2005). Exploring basic processes underlying acceptance
and mindfulness. In S. M. Orsillo & L. Roemer (Eds.), Acceptance and mindfulnessbased approaches to anxiety,
(pp. 325–357). Boston, MA: Springer.
AUTHOR BIOGRAPHIES
Jim Doorley is a doctoral candidate in Clinical Psychology at George Mason University. His research focuses on
psychological flexibility, wellbeing, resilience, and their application to athletes. Jim is also a clinical fellow in
psychology at Massachusetts General Hospital where he researches and applies mindbody interventions for
patients with neurological disorders, orthopedic injuries, and other chronic medical conditions. He received his
B.A. in Psychology from the University of Massachusetts Amherst.
Fallon Goodman is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Psychology and directs the Emotion and
Resilience Laboratory at the University of South Florida. Her research explores connections between anxiety
and wellbeing, including identifying barriers to social connection and strategies for mitigating loneliness and
rejection. She earned her B.S from the University of Maryland and Ph.D. from George Mason University, and
she completed her predoctoral clinical training at Harvard Medical School.
Kerry C. Kelso is a doctoral candidate in Clinical Psychology at George Mason University. Currently she is
interested in sources of risk and resilience in anxiety including experiential avoidance, psychological flexibility,
meaning in life, and purpose in life. She aims to understand the nuances of these relationships and how they
unfold over time with the ultimate goal of identifying targets for anxiety prevention and intervention. She
earned a B.A. in Psychology at University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and M.A. in Clinical Psychology at
Appalachian State University.
Todd B. Kashdan is a Professor in the Department of Psychology at George Mason University. He has published
over 200 peerreviewed journal articles, mostly on the intersection of wellbeing and emotional disturbances,
including the nature of curiosity, meaning and purpose in life, psychological strengths, and resilience. His books
include The Upside of Your Dark Side (2014) and Curious? Discover the Missing Ingredient to a Fulfilling Life (2009).
He received a B.S in Human Service Studies from Cornell University, and a Ph.D. in Psychology from the
University of New York at Buffalo.
How to cite this article: Doorley JD, Goodman FR, Kelso KC, Kashdan TB. Psychological flexibility: What we
know, what we do not know, and what we think we know. Soc Personal Psychol Compass. 2020;e12566.
https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12566
DOORLEY ET AL.
-
11 of 11
... Skillful adaptation is supported by psychological flexibility, which refers to the capacity to fully engage with the present moment, including any mental states it evokes (i.e. thoughts and emotions), enabling individuals to adapt their behavior in agreement with one's goals and values (Doorley et al., 2020;Hayes, 2005;Pellerin et al., 2022). Psychological flexibility is a resource that supports skillful adaptation in the context of stress and coping (Hobfoll, 2002) and is a key component of emotional resilience (Bryan et al, 2015) that represents a form of embodied 'power' and strength (Johnstone & Boyle, 2018, Cowden-Falletta et al, 2022. ...
... This inflexibility is a transdiagnostic feature of various psychological disorders (Levin et al., 2014) for which targeted interventions show positive outcomes and greater psychological flexibility (Rutschman et al., 2024). Process-based treatments for example, aim to foster adaptive traits rather than focusing on diagnosis-specific symptoms (Ciarrochi et al., 2022;Hayes et al., 2020), building capacity to regulate the emotions, equipping individuals to handle challenging emotions (Doorley et al., 2020;Gross, 2015) and promoting holistic wellbeing (Kemp et al., 2022). The ability to reframe negative experiences fosters resilience, reducing negative emotions and enhancing positive responses to adversity (Troy et al., 2018). ...
Preprint
Full-text available
This article explores the traditional martial art of Wing Chun through the lens of psychology, examining its potential to promote inner development and holistic wellbeing. Originating in Southern China and now practised worldwide, Wing Chun is characterised by its emphasis on fluidity, adaptation, and effectiveness. At its core are five guiding principles—Simplicity, Practicality, Efficiency, Effectiveness, and Directness (SPEED)—which shape its practice and reflect its Buddhist and Taoist philosophical roots. We propose that these principles provide a foundation for understanding psychological wellbeing that lay a foundation for developing novel interventions and promoting wellbeing at scale. To articulate this, we introduce a new conceptual framework, REACH, which encompasses five interconnected constructs: Radical nonattachment, Embodied empowerment, (skillful) Adaptation, (self) Control, and (psychological) Hardiness. Radical nonattachment cultivates presence and responsiveness through mindfulness-in-action, facilitating a compassionate awareness of self, others and nature. Embodied empowerment enhances awareness and intuitive decision-making through embodied self-reflexivity, supporting individuals to navigate internal and external cues with greater agency while promoting a deeper sense of groundedness and engagement with the world. Skillful adaptation promotes flexibility and creativity, enabling the experience of psychological flow and supporting practitioners to dynamically engage with their environment. Self-control refines focus and energy management through reflexive, nonconscious regulation, supporting purposeful goal-setting with reduced cognitive effort while cultivating harmony and balance. Psychological hardiness strengthens resilience and fierce compassion, enabling individuals to transform adversity into growth and enhancing capacity for working toward social justice and resisting dominant social narratives. These constructs are presented as power resources, and by bridging martial discipline with mindful awareness and social engagement, we suggest that the REACH model provides a foundation for supporting inner development and holistic wellbeing.
... Although previous meta-analyses have investigated the efficacy of ACT-based therapies for SUDs and suggested that these are promising therapeutic approaches, they have all drawn attention to the lack of identification of change processes as the main limitation of ACT research for SUDs (Ii et al., 2019;Lee et al., 2015;Ren et al., 2019). This is not surprising since, as mentioned above, few instruments have been developed to measure all the components of the Hexaflex Model, and the AAQ-II has been the most widely used of these measures (Cherry et al., 2021;Doorley et al., 2020). ...
... Moreover, ACT research on SUDs, substance abuse, and addiction could use the specific measure of experiential avoidance for substance abuse (AAQ-SA, Luoma et al., 2011) to assess this component. As previous research has suggested (Cherry et al., 2021;Doorley et al., 2020), we encourage researchers to use these multidimensional measures to thoroughly assess the mechanisms of ACT. ...
Article
Full-text available
Psychological inflexibility (PI) and psychological flexibility (PF) are transdiagnostic mechanisms involved in the development, maintenance and treatment of SUDs. Evidence on the relationship between their components and substance abuse has not been investigated using a meta-analytic approach. The aim of this meta-analysis was to quantify the association between the dimensions of PF and PI, and substance abuse. A systematic literature review was conducted in four databases. A total of 24 studies were included. The associations were quantified using Pearson’s r correlation coefficients, and two separate meta-analyses were conducted: one for the association between mindfulness and substance abuse, and one for the association between experiential avoidance and substance abuse. The meta-analyses showed a low and negative mindfulness-substance abuse relationship (r = -0.25), and a moderate and positive experiential avoidance-substance abuse relationship (r = 0.34). One study reported a correlation of r = -0.17 between defusion and substance abuse. The search for studies on the remaining components was unsuccessful. Substance type and target population moderated the relationship between mindfulness and substance abuse. Clinical and empirical implications of these results are discussed, and recommendations and future research directions are outlined.
... The relationships with emotional symptomatology and psychological inflexibility were of medium magnitude for the Reward Probability dimension (inverse), and large magnitude with Environmental Suppressors (direct), and total RPI (inverse). As environmental reward increases, the level of life satisfaction increases, and emotional symptomatology decreases (Han & Kim, 2023), as well as psychological inflexibility (Doorley et al., 2020). The study conducted by McPhee et al. (2020) indicates that environmental reward can moderate the symptoms of depression, anxiety, and coping with substance use, particularly when this reward decreases. ...
Article
Full-text available
The psychometric properties of the Reward Probability Index (RPI), which assesses environmental reward as an indirect measure of response-contingent positive reinforcement (RCPR), were estimated in a Mexican population. With the voluntary participation of 1297 adults, reliability was assessed, and evidence was collected regarding the internal structure and its relationship with emotional symptomatology and other variables. Good internal consistency indices (ω and α) were found for both the total scale and its dimensions. A two-dimensional structure, comprising Reward Probability and Environmental Suppressors, and a second-order factor consistent with RCPR theory, was confirmed. This model demonstrated measurement invariance across sex, mental health treatment status, and the presence or absence of emotional symptomatology. Consistent relationships were observed between RPI scores and emotional symptomatology, psychological inflexibility, and life satisfaction. Additionally, evidence was found supporting the criterion validity of the RPI in relation to depression.
... Psychological flexibility helps individuals confront their current circumstances, providing them the ability to evaluate situations and adapt or maintain their behavior accordingly, ensuring effective functioning (Alizadeh et al., 2023;Hakimi Dezfouli & Ebrahimpour, 2024). This construct is grounded in six core processes: acceptance, cognitive defusion, being present, self-as-context, value clarification, and committed action (Doorley et al., 2020). ...
Article
Full-text available
Objective: The present study aimed to determine the effectiveness of group cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) on psychological flexibility and psychological hardiness in female heads of household. Methods and Materials: This research employed a quasi-experimental design with a pretest-posttest setup, including an experimental group and a control group. The study population consisted of 140 female heads of household who referred to the Welfare Organization in Sari during the second half of 2023 and registered their cases. The sample included 30 female heads of household, selected using a non-random purposive sampling method and subsequently randomly assigned to either the experimental group (15 participants) or the control group (15 participants). Data collection was conducted using questionnaires on psychological flexibility and psychological hardiness. The experimental group underwent eight sessions of group CBT, each lasting 120 minutes. Following the completion of group CBT sessions, a posttest was administered to both the experimental and control groups. Findings: The findings indicated that the mean scores of psychological flexibility and psychological hardiness in the posttest for the experimental group were significantly higher compared to the pretest. Conclusion: Therefore, group CBT has a positive impact on psychological flexibility and psychological hardiness in female heads of household.
... Psychological flexibility is known to be the cornerstone of mental health and wellbeing (Doorley et al., 2020;Kashdan & Rottenberg, 2010) and is characterized by the ability to respond flexibly to undesirable thoughts, feelings, and experiences, while engaging in the value-based behaviors (Hayes et al., 2012b). A growing body of evidence has considered components of psychological flexibility as potential mechanisms of change by which acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) might improve wellbeing . ...
... Other psychological characteristic that may predict PTG is psychological flexibility. Psychological flexibility refers to the capability of modifying or continuing with practical behavioral categories when it helps in achieving desired outcomes (Doorley et al., 2020). It emphasizes the significance of adaptability in particular scenarios that are essential for maintaining a healthy lifestyle, specifically tough situations that would otherwise hinder the pursuit of one's valued living. ...
Article
Full-text available
COVID-19 pandemic left so much unknown and unexplored knowledge in the field of Positive Psychology. This systematic literature review (SLR) aims to identify the factors that can predict posttraumatic growth after the traumatic exposure of COVID-19 pandemic. This SLR employed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, with article selection criteria formulated using the Populations, Exposure, Outcomes, and Study Design (PEOS) framework. This SLR found that the only consistent external predictive factor for PTG is social support, while the consistent internal factors from inside the individual are self-efficacy, resilience, adaptive coping, and rumination. Emotional creativity and psychological flexibility were other internal factors considered as predictors. The demographic factors which are considered can predict PTG are being female, age, and economic status. The results of this literature review found that most studies on predictors for PTG came from the geographical setting of China, with Cross-Sectional as the most preferred study design. Findings from this SLR contribute to future research agenda concerning study design and geographical setting, as well as mental health promotion to increase PTG in the community after years of COVID-19 pandemic. Keyword: Posttraumatic; growth; predictor factors, COVID-19 Pandemic.
Article
A considerable proportion of patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) experience emotional problems due to the continual demands of the disease, which may persist throughout life without appropriate support. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and acceptability of an Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) intervention and provide early indications of its capacity to impact psychosocial outcomes for adolescents with T1D. Twenty-two participants were randomised to one of two groups: (1) ACT intervention for 6 weeks or (2) standard care. Given the ease of recruitment, high rate of attendance for the ACT intervention and the positive responses to the intervention, the intervention was deemed feasible and acceptable to adolescents with T1D. Outcomes trended towards enhanced Quality of Life and reduced Diabetes Distress. Future work should consider a larger scale randomised controlled trial to investigate the efficacy of the intervention for T1D and other chronic illnesses.
Article
Parents of children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) experience stress, potentially affecting parenting and child outcomes. The roles of psychological flexibility and parental reflective functioning in coping strategies of parents of children with ASD are not fully understood. The study aims to examine differences in psychological flexibility, parental reflective functioning, parental self-efficacy, and coping strategies among parents of children with ASD and children with typical development (TD), while considering gender differences. In addition, it seeks to explore whether parental efficacy mediates the association between psychological flexibility, parental reflective functioning, and coping. The sample was comprised of 210 Israeli parents, with 86 having children with ASD and 124 having children with TD. A moderation analysis was conducted to investigate the moderation model. Parents of children with ASD demonstrated lower psychological flexibility, parental self-efficacy, and support-seeking coping strategies and higher proactive and disengagement coping strategies. Mothers reported higher parental reflective functioning and proactive and support-seeking coping strategies than fathers. In parents of children with ASD, parental self-efficacy mediated the association between parental reflective functioning and proactive coping strategies. Policymakers should advance intervention to enhance parental reflective functioning and parental self-efficacy for parents of children with ASD, with a special focus on fathers.
Article
Full-text available
Background The extent to which a person believes they can change or control their own emotions is associated with trait-level symptoms of mood and anxiety-related psychopathology.Method The present study examined how this belief relates to momentary and daily self-reports of affect, emotion regulation tendencies, and perceived effectiveness of emotion regulation attempts throughout a five-week experience sampling study conducted in N = 113 high socially anxious people (https://osf.io/eprwt/).ResultsResults suggest that people with relatively stronger beliefs that their emotions are malleable experienced more momentary and daily positive affect (relative to negative affect), even after controlling for social anxiety symptom severity (although only daily positive affect, and not momentary positive affect, remained significant after correcting for false discovery rate). However, emotion malleability beliefs were not uniquely associated with other emotion regulation-related outcomes in daily life, despite theory suggesting malleability beliefs influence motivation to engage in emotion regulation.Conclusion The paucity of significant associations observed between trait malleability beliefs and momentary and daily self-reports of emotion regulation (despite consistent findings of such relationships at trait levels) calls for additional research to better understand the complex dynamics of emotion beliefs in daily life.
Article
Full-text available
Psychological flexibility (PF), defined as the ability to pursue valued life aims despite the presence of distress, is a fundamental contributor to health (Kashdan & Rottenberg, 2010). Existing measures of PF have failed to consider the valued goals that give context for why people are willing to manage distress. Using 4 independent samples and 3 follow-up samples, we examined the role of PF in well-being, emotional experience and regulation, resilience, goal pursuit, and daily functioning. We describe the development and psychometric properties of the Personalized Psychological Flexibility Index (PPFI), which captures tendencies to avoid, accept, and harness discomfort during valued goal pursuit. Correlational, laboratory, and experience-sampling methods show that the PPFI measures a trait-like individual difference dimension that is related to a variety of well-being and healthy personality constructs. Unlike existing measures of PF, the PPFI was shown to be distinct from negative emotionality. Beyond trait measures, the PPFI is associated with effective daily goals and life strivings pursuit and adaptive emotional and regulatory responses to stressful life events. By adopting our measurement index, PF may be better integrated into mainstream theory and research on adaptive human functioning.
Article
Full-text available
This study examines relationships between emotion beliefs and emotion regulation strategy use among people with social anxiety disorder (SAD) and a psychologically healthy control group. Using experience-sampling methodology, we tested group differences in 2 types of emotion beliefs (emotion control values and emotion malleability beliefs) and whether emotion beliefs predicted trait and daily use of cognitive reappraisal and emotion suppression. People with SAD endorsed higher emotion control values and lower emotion malleability beliefs than did healthy controls. Across groups, emotion control values were positively associated with suppression (but unrelated to reappraisal), and emotion malleability beliefs were negatively associated with suppression and positively associated with reappraisal. We also addressed 2 exploratory questions related to measurement. First, we examined whether trait and state measures of emotion regulation strategies were related to emotion control values in different ways and found similar associations across measures. Second, we examined whether explicit and implicit measures of emotion control values were related to daily emotion regulation strategy use in different ways-and found that an implicit measure was unrelated to strategy use. Results are discussed in the context of growing research on metaemotions and the measurement of complex features of emotion regulation. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).
Article
Full-text available
Psychological flexibility refers to a way of interacting with internal experiences and the external environment that advances one toward chosen values whereas psychological inflexibility reflects rigid adherence to ineffective responses such that valued living is compromised. Psychological flexibility is a critical variable of interest in acceptance and commitment therapy, thus, accurate assessment of this construct is pertinent to professionals in the field. Numerous measures of psychological flexibility for specific conditions exist and the psychometric validation of each of these measures varies in breadth and depth. To orient professionals to the scope of available measures as well as their psychometric properties, the current review summarizes the existing literature on context-specific measures of psychological flexibility. Most measures demonstrated satisfactory basic psychometric properties, though their clinical utility (e.g., treatment sensitivity) has largely been underexplored. Generally, context-specific measures performed better than a generic measure of psychological flexibility with respect to incremental validity and treatment sensitivity. Still, further research is needed to validate these measures (e.g., discriminant validity) in order to justify their use across settings and study designs.
Article
Full-text available
People with anxiety disorders tend to make decisions on the basis of avoiding threat rather than obtaining rewards. Despite a robust literature examining approach-avoidance motivation, less is known about goal pursuit. The present study examined the content, motives, consequences, and daily correlates of strivings among adults diagnosed with social anxiety disorder and healthy controls. Participants generated six strivings along with the motives and consequences of their pursuit. Compared with controls, people with social anxiety disorder were less strongly driven by autonomous motives and reported greater difficulty pursuing strivings. Coders analyzed strivings for the presence of 10 themes: achievement, affiliation, avoidance, emotion regulation, generativity, interpersonal, intimacy, power, self-presentation, and self-sufficiency. People with social anxiety disorder constructed more emotion regulation strivings than did controls, but they did not differ across other themes. This research illustrates how studying personality at different levels of analysis (traits, strivings) can yield novel information for understanding anxiety disorders.
Article
Full-text available
Psychological inflexibility and experiential avoidance are key constructs in the Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) model of behavior change. Wolgast (2014) questioned the construct validity of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II (AAQ-II), the most used self-report instrument to assess the efficacy of ACT interventions. Wolgast suggested that the AAQ-II measured psychological distress rather than psychological inflexibility and experiential avoidance. The current study further examined the construct validity of the AAQ-II by conducting an online cross-sectional survey (n = 524), including separate measures of experiential avoidance and psychological distress. Confirmatory factor analyses indicated that items from the AAQ-II correlated more highly with measures of depression, anxiety, and stress than the Brief Experiential Avoidance Questionnaire (BEAQ). Implications include that, as broad measures of experiential avoidance, the AAQ-II and BEAQ may not measure the same construct. In terms of psychological distress, the BEAQ has greater discriminant validity than the AAQ-II, and perhaps an alternative instrument of psychological inflexibility might be needed to assess core outcomes in ACT intervention research.
Article
Full-text available
The purpose of this study was to examine acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) as a standalone treatment for trichotillomania in a randomized controlled trial of adults and adolescents. Participants consisted of a community sample of treatment seeking adults and adolescents with trichotillomania. Of the eligible 39 participants randomized into treatment and waitlist groups, 25 completed treatment and were included in the final analysis. Treatment consisted of a 10-session ACT protocol. Multiple mixed models repeated measures analyses were utilized to evaluate changes in trichotillomania symptom severity, daily number of hairs pulled and urges experienced, and experiential avoidance from pretreatment to posttreatment. Findings indicated significant changes in symptom severity and daily hairs pulled, but not daily urges experienced or psychological flexibility. However, psychological flexibility saw a 24.5% decrease in the treatment group and reduced from clinical to subclinical levels on average. This study suggests that ACT alone is an effective treatment for adults and adolescents with trichotillomania. Outcomes appear to be similar to trials that combined ACT and habit reversal training (HRT).
Article
One potential factor that could influence how individuals with at least moderate symptoms of depression cope with upsetting events in their daily lives is the beliefs that these individuals hold about whether emotions are malleable or fixed. The current study adopted an experience sampling approach to examine how the beliefs about emotion’s malleability related to daily positive and negative affect and daily emotion regulation efforts among individuals with at least moderate symptoms of depression (N = 84). Results demonstrated that individuals having at least moderate symptoms of depression who held more malleable beliefs about emotions reported decreased negative affect both overall during the day and specifically in response to daily upsetting events. Additionally, these individuals who held more malleable beliefs about their emotions also reported more daily use of cognitive reappraisal to regulate their emotions in response to upsetting daily events. Results from the current study extend previous work examining the relationship between emotion malleability beliefs, emotional experiences, and emotion regulation to examine these relationships in people who are moderately depressed as they navigate the emotional landscape of their daily lives.
Article
Objective: We investigated how the Big Five traits predict individual differences in five theoretically important emotion regulation goals that are commonly pursued – pro-hedonic, contra-hedonic, performance, pro-social, and impression management. Method: We conducted two studies: (1) a large survey study consisting of undergraduates (N = 394; 18-25 years; 69% female; 56% European-American) and community adults (N = 302; 19-74 years; 50% female; 75% European-American) who completed a newly developed global measure of individual differences in emotion regulation goals and (2) a 9-day daily diary study with community adults (N = 272; 50% female; 84% European-American) who completed daily reports of emotion regulation goals. In both studies, participants completed a measure of the Big Five. Results: Across global and daily measures, pro-hedonic goals and pro-social goals were positively associated with agreeableness, performance goals were positively associated with openness, and impression management goals were positively associated with neuroticism. Globally, contra-hedonic goals were also negatively associated with agreeableness and conscientiousness. Conclusions: The Big Five systematically predict the emotion regulation goals people typically pursue. These findings have important implications for understanding why people engage in certain forms of regulatory behavior and why personality has consequences for well-being.
Article
Social anxiety disorder (SAD) and major depressive disorder (MDD) are highly comorbid, and together they result in greater functional impairment and a poorer prognosis than either condition alone. Theoretical models implicate impairments in emotion regulation in the development and maintenance of internalizing disorders, yet there has been no systematic comparison of emotion regulation in social anxiety and depression. The current review presents an in-depth examination of the literature on two widely-studied emotion regulation strategies, expressive suppression (ES) and cognitive reappraisal (CR), in SAD and MDD. Our review indicated that SAD is broadly characterized by an overreliance on ES, which is associated with negative social and emotional consequences. SAD is also characterized by ineffective utilization of CR, which inhibits the potential positive emotional benefits of this adaptive emotion regulation strategy. In contrast, MDD is broadly characterized by an underutilization of CR, which may be particularly detrimental in stressful or uncontrollable situations. For both SAD and MDD, treatment intervention appears to address deficits in CR but not ES. After reviewing the literature, we propose multiple pathways by which impairments in ES and CR may increase risk for the co-occurrence of SAD and MDD. Clinical implications and future research directions are also discussed.