Conference PaperPDF Available

The impact of ultra-processed food on carbon, water and ecological footprints of food in Brazil

Authors:

Abstract

Background: Ultra-processed foods (UPF) have been associated with major diet-related public health issues that share underlying drivers with climate change. Both challenges require major changes to the food system and so the potential benefits to health and the environment present a double motivation for transformation. Our aim is to assess the impacts of UPF on total greenhouse gas emissions (GHGE), water and ecological footprints in Brazil food purchases. Methods: We have used data from 4 Brazilian Household Budget Surveys (1987, 1996, 2003, 2009). Each food item was classified into NOVA food groups (unprocessed/minimally processed, culinary ingredients, processed and ultra-processed). The information was linked to nutrition and footprint data. Purchases were converted into grams per capita per day to estimate total energy (kcal), percentage of energy from UPF, as well as total GHGE, water and ecological footprints. We performed linear regression to calculate year-adjusted means of footprints per 1000 Kcal by year-specific quintiles of UPF participation in the total energy. The data were analysed in R v.3.6.1 and STATA SE 14.1. Results: The mean UPF participation in total energy varied from 13% (SD 2.4) in the 1st UPF quintile to 29% (SD 5.1) in the 5th quintile. The footprints increased linearly across quintiles: the mean g CO2eq varied from 1312 in the 1st to 1721 in the 5th UPF quintile (p-trend<0.001); the mean litres of water varied from 1420 in the 1st to 1830 in the 5th quintile (ptrend< 0.001); the mean m2 varied from 9.4 in the 1st to 12.3 in the 5th quintile (p < 0.001). Conclusions: The environmental impacts were higher for Brazilian diets with a larger fraction of energy from UPF. Specifically, low UPF diets seem to have lower GHGE, water and ecological footprints. Our findings offer new motivators for dietary change to simultaneously healthier and more sustainable eating patterns and will be of relevance to consumers and policymakers. Key messages: � Diets high in UPF cause more climate impact than diets with lower levels of UPF. � Healthy and sustainable dietary patterns should be low in ultra-processed foods.
and was formulated to avoid the spread of the infection and to
implement neonatal care.
Key messages:
A proposal for the management of the newborn born to a
suspected or coronavirus-positive mother formulated to
avoid the spread of the infection and to implement neonatal
care in second-level centers.
Operational indications for the management of the newborn
baby of a mother with suspected or confirmed Covid-19
positivity and neonatal care in second-level centers.
9.B. Oral session: Processed food
The impact of ultra-processed food on carbon, water
and ecological footprints of food in Brazil
Jacqueline Tereza da Silva
JT da Silva
1
, GL da Cruz
1,7
, F Rauber
1,2
, ML Louzada
1
,
ARG Kluczkovski
3
, A Frankowska
3
, X Schmidt
4
, C Reynolds
5,6
,
S Bridle
3
,RBLevy
1,2
1
Department of Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Sao
Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
2
Department of Nutrition, School of Public Health, University of Sao Paulo,
Sao Paulo, Brazil
3
School of Physics and Astronomy, School of Physics and Astronomy,
Manchester, UK
4
Institute of Energy Futures, Brunel University London, London, UK
5
Department of Geography, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
6
Centre for Food Policy, City University, London, UK
7
Research Institute, Hospital do Coracao, Sao Paulo, Brazil
Contact: jacsnt@yahoo.com.br
Background:
Ultra-processed foods (UPF) have been associated with major
diet-related public health issues that share underlying drivers
with climate change. Both challenges require major changes to
the food system and so the potential benefits to health and the
environment present a double motivation for transformation.
Our aim is to assess the impacts of UPF on total greenhouse
gas emissions (GHGE), water and ecological footprints in
Brazil food purchases.
Methods:
We have used data from 4 Brazilian Household Budget Surveys
(1987, 1996, 2003, 2009). Each food item was classified into
NOVA food groups (unprocessed/minimally processed, culin-
ary ingredients, processed and ultra-processed). The informa-
tion was linked to nutrition and footprint data. Purchases were
converted into grams per capita per day to estimate total
energy (kcal), percentage of energy from UPF, as well as total
GHGE, water and ecological footprints. We performed linear
regression to calculate year-adjusted means of footprints per
1000 Kcal by year-specific quintiles of UPF participation in the
total energy. The data were analysed in R v.3.6.1 and STATA
SE 14.1.
Results:
The mean UPF participation in total energy varied from 13%
(SD 2.4) in the 1st UPF quintile to 29% (SD 5.1) in the 5th
quintile. The footprints increased linearly across quintiles: the
mean g CO2eq varied from 1312 in the 1st to 1721 in the 5th
UPF quintile (p-trend<0.001); the mean litres of water varied
from 1420 in the 1st to 1830 in the 5th quintile (p-
trend<0.001); the mean m2 varied from 9.4 in the 1st to
12.3 in the 5th quintile (p < 0.001).
Conclusions:
The environmental impacts were higher for Brazilian diets with
a larger fraction of energy from UPF. Specifically, low UPF
diets seem to have lower GHGE, water and ecological
footprints. Our findings offer new motivators for dietary
change to simultaneously healthier and more sustainable
eating patterns and will be of relevance to consumers and
policymakers.
Key messages:
Diets high in UPF cause more climate impact than diets with
lower levels of UPF.
Healthy and sustainable dietary patterns should be low in
ultra-processed foods.
Mediterranean diet, sociodemographic factors and
ultra-processed food consumption in Portugal
Milena Moraes
MM Moraes
1
, B Oliveira
1,2
, C Afonso
1,3
, C Santos
1
, RC Miranda
4
,
F Rauber
4,5
,RBLevy
4
, S Rodrigues
1,3
1
Faculdade de Cie
ˆncias da Nutric¸a
˜o e Alimentac¸a
˜o, Universidade do Porto,
Porto, Portugal
2
Laborato
´rio de Intelige
ˆncia Artificial e Apoio a
`Decisa
˜o, Instituto de
Engenharia de Sistemas e Computadores, Tecnologia e Cie
ˆncia, Porto,
Portugal
3
EPIUnit - Instituto de Sau
´de Pu
´blica, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
4
Department of Preventative Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of
Sa
˜o Paulo, Sa
˜o Paulo, Brazil
5
Department of Nutrition, School of Public Health, University of Sa
˜o Paulo,
Sa
˜o Paulo, Brazil
Contact: milenanut@gmail.com
Background:
Mediterranean diet has been shown to promote beneficial
effects on health, while ultra-processed food (UPF) consump-
tion has been associated with lower diet quality and higher risk
for non-communicable diseases. Our aims were to explore the
adherence to a Mediterranean dietary pattern (MDP) in
Portugal and its association with sociodemographic factors
and UPF consumption.
Methods:
Participants were from the Portuguese National Food,
Nutrition and Physical Activity Survey 2015-2016, aged 18-
84y (n = 3,852). CAPI face-to-face interviews were used
including 2 dietary 24-h recalls. UPF were identified using
NOVA classification. Adherence to MDP was defined by the
Mediterranean Diet Score (MDS), which may vary from 0 to 9.
MDS6 was considered as high adherence. Weighted multi-
variate logistic regression analysis was used to explore
associations of high adherence to MDP with sex, age, region,
educational level, family income and dietary share of UPF
groups.
Results:
High adherence to MDP was observed for 19.6% of
participants and was inversely associated with higher con-
sumption of UPF, namely, sugar-sweetened beverages
(OR = 0.924; 95%CI 0.883-0.966), confectionery (OR = 0.893;
95%CI 0.816-0.977), sweet snacks (OR = 0.953; 95%CI 0.923-
0.985), cakes/desserts (OR = 0.956; 95%CI 0.934-0.978) and
meat products (OR = 0.922; 95%CI 0.874-0.972). Being female
(OR = 0.629; 95%CI 0.471-0.841) and not from the North or
Alentejo regions were inversely associated with high adherence
to MDP. There was no relation between income and adherence
to MDP. The higher the level of education or age, the higher
the odds of high adherence to MDP (OR = 2.573; 95%CI
1.741-3.803 and OR = 1.028; 95%CI 1.020-1.037, respectively).
Conclusions:
Actions to improve adherence to MDP in Portugal should
consider discouraging UPF consumption and be addressed to
specific subgroups.
Funding:
POCI-01-0145-FEDER-032090 (FCT/FEDER); FAPESP 2018/
07391-9, 2019/05972-7 (MCR), 2016/14302-7 (FR).
Key messages:
High adherence to a Mediterranean dietary pattern was
observed for near 20% of Potuguese over 18 years old. The
higher the level of education or age, the higher the odds of
high adherence to MDP.
16
th
World Congress on Public Health 2020 2020–01 v161
Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/eurpub/article/30/Supplement_5/ckaa165.433/5913606 by guest on 10 October 2020
... The variation in infrastructure and dietary habits is probably the reason behind this variation. Another explanation for this inconsistency may be attributed to the high consumption of processed food, with evidence suggesting that highly processed food significantly contributes to EF [41,42], underscoring the significance of rural lifestyles in maintaining lower EFs and suggest that policy interventions should focus on sustaining these practices while ensuring food security and nutritional adequacy. ...
Article
Full-text available
The ecological implications of global development have been a primary focus in discussions surrounding sustainability. As urban development expands globally, addressing its many ecological concerns becomes imperative. However, the ecological footprint (EF) analysis of urban sustainability within the sub-Saharan region, particularly Nigeria, remains largely unexplored. Here, we used the EF indices to explore the environmental sustainability of Ibadan City, one of Nigeria's fastest-growing urban centres. We implemented a bottom-up EF approach in the study, employing a cross-sectional design. We used an EF questionnaire to gather monthly household consumption data on food, energy, and water. We analysed these data descriptively and methodologically using EF formulae. Findings indicate environmental sustainability, as reflected in the low EF of 0.43gha/capita, with the energy footprint accounting for the majority (93%) at 0.4gha/capita. In comparison, the food footprint had the lowest share (below 3%) at 0.01gha/capita. Our findings demonstrate the significant impact of energy consumption on the overall EF, reinforcing the need for more sustainable energy solutions in urban planning, thus contributing to urban sustainability by informing urban planning and energy policy in alignment with the global sustainability drive.
... As suggested above (in section 1.2.), UPFs and UPFs supply chain/ system clearly do not address all six dimensions of FNS at the same time (Anastasiou et al., 2022;da Silva et al., 2020;Fardet & Rock, 2020;Monteiro et al., 2021) (Figure 2). Therefore, there is a need to question ultra-processing and to define more sustainable food processing. ...
Article
In the agri-food chain, while the impact of producers and consumers on sustainability has been well studied, food processing has been less explored. This position paper aims to discuss the potential of food processing to address all food and nutrition security (FNS) outcomes in order to achieve improved food system sustainability. First, FNS dimensions and the four pillars of agro-food industry sustainability are defined, with a focus on ultra-processed foods. Second, the food matrix concept is developed as a new paradigm to holistically address all FNS. It is concluded that food processing should become more involved in circular food systems and bioeconomy, and that we need to relocate food production, processing, and consumption to be more aligned with regional food production specificities. For this, minimal processing to preserve food matrices should be preferred. Therefore, the strong current tendency to develop reductionist and siloed innovative solutions to improve the sustainability of food systems should be questioned.
... In the field of nutrition, studies using ecological (EF) [7][8][9], water (WF) [10][11][12][13][14], and carbon (CF) [15][16][17][18] footprints to assess the dietary sustainability of population groups have become frequent. These indicators are interesting as they enable laying the basis for educational action and public policies aimed at reducing environmental impacts and improving health through diet [19,20]. ...
Article
Full-text available
The analysis of dietary environmental impacts has proven to be an important tool for guiding the adoption of healthier and more sustainable diets. This study aimed to estimate the dietary carbon (CF), water (WF), and ecological (EF) footprints of residents in the city of Natal, Brazil; the study also aimed to verify their association with socioeconomic factors and food purchase practices. This is a cross-sectional study that used dietary data from 411 adults and elderlies, which was collected via a questionnaire that applied to the respondents. The results showed that the dietary CF was 1901.88 g CO2 eq/day/1000 kcal, the WF was 1834.03 L/day/1000 kcal, and the EF was 14.29 m2/day/1000 kcal. The highest environmental footprint values showed an association (p ≤ 0.05) with the factors of male sex, white ethnicity, and higher income and schooling, whereas the lowest environmental footprint values were associated with social vulnerability variables such as female sex, non-white ethnicity, and lower income and schooling (p ≤ 0.05). Moreover, people with lower environmental footprints consumed less fast food, had fewer meals at snack bars, and used food delivery services less often than those with higher footprints. The foods that most contributed to the CFs and WFs were beef and chicken, while fish and beef contribute the most to the EFs. The data in the present study show that a diet with a lower environmental impact is not always equal to a sustainable diet. This relationship is paradoxical and relates to food justice, as people with lower environmental footprint values are the same ones with worse socioeconomic conditions. In this sense, is it essential to consider the influence of the social context when assessing dietary environmental impacts and when assessing actions that promote healthier and more sustainable diets.
Article
Full-text available
There is a growing global consensus among food system experts that diets and how we source our foods must change. The sustainable nutrition community continues exploring the environmental impact and dietary value of foods. Packaged foods have been largely ignored within the dialogue, and if they are addressed, existing frameworks tend to label them all as “ultra-processed” and uniformly discourage their consumption. This approach lacks the nuance needed to holistically evaluate packaged foods within recommended dietary patterns. Additionally, there is considerable diversity of opinion within the literature on these topics, especially on how to best improve nutrition security in populations most at risk of diet-related chronic disease. In support of addressing these challenges, eight sustainability and nutrition experts were convened by Clif Bar & Company for a facilitated discussion on the urgent need to drive adoption of healthy, sustainable diets; the crucial role that certain packaged foods can play in helping make such diets achievable and accessible; and the need for actionable guidance around how to recommend and choose packaged foods that consider human, societal, and planetary health. This paper summarizes the meeting discussion, which informed the development of a proposed framework based on guiding principles for defining sustainable, nutritious packaged foods across key nutrition, environmental, economic and sociocultural wellbeing indicators. While additional research is needed to substantiate specific metrics in order to operationalize the framework, it is intended to be a foundation from which to build and refine as science and measurement capabilities advance, and an important step toward broader adoption of healthy, sustainable diets.
Article
Advancing sustainable diets for nutrition security and sustainable development necessitates clear nutrition metrics for measuring nutritional quality of diets. Food composition, nutrient requirements, and dietary intake are among the most common nutrition metrics used in the current assessment of sustainable diets. Broadly, most studies in the area classify animal-source foods (ASF) as having a substantially higher environmental footprint in comparison to plant-source foods (PSF). As a result, much of the current dietary advice promulgates diets containing higher proportions of PSF. However, this generalization is misleading since most of these studies do not distinguish between the gross and bioavailable nutrient fractions in mixed human diets. The bioavailability of essential nutrients including β-carotene, vitamin B-12, iron, zinc, calcium, and indispensable amino acids varies greatly across different diets. The failure to consider bioavailability in sustainability measurements undermines the complementary role that ASF play in achieving nutrition security in vulnerable populations. This article critically reviews the scientific evidence on the holistic nutritional quality of diets and identifies methodological problems that exist in the way the nutritional quality of diets is measured. Finally, we discuss the importance of developing nutrient bioavailability as a requisite nutrition metric to contextualize the environmental impacts of different diets.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any references for this publication.