ArticlePublisher preview available

Does Meditation Training Influence Social Approach and Avoidance Goals? Evidence from a Randomized Intervention Study of Midlife Adults

Authors:
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the authors.

Abstract and Figures

Objectives Social approach and avoidance goals—which refer to individual differences in the desire to pursue rewards versus avoid negative experiences in social relationships—have numerous implications for the health and quality of social relationships. Although endorsement of these goals largely arises from people’s pre-dispositions towards approach and avoidance, in this research, we proposed that meditation training has the potential to beneficially influence the extent to which people adopt approach and avoidance goals. Specifically, we hypothesized that individuals who were randomly assigned to receive training in mindfulness or loving-kindness meditation would report differences in social approach and avoidance goals, as compared with those in a wait-list control condition, and that these effects would be mediated by differences in positive and negative emotions. Methods To examine these hypotheses, we drew upon a community-based, randomized intervention study of 138 midlife adults, who were assigned to receive mindfulness training, loving-kindness training, or no training in meditation. Results As compared with the control condition, results demonstrated that loving-kindness training was directly associated with lower social avoidance goals, and indirectly associated with greater social approach goals, via enhanced positive emotion. Conclusions These results suggest loving-kindness meditation is a means by which people can beneficially influence their approach and avoidance tendencies, which likely plays an important role in enhancing their social relationships.
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
ORIGINAL PAPER
Does Meditation Training Influence Social Approach and Avoidance
Goals? Evidence from a Randomized Intervention Study
of Midlife Adults
Brian P. Don
1
&Sara B. Algoe
1
&Barbara L. Fredrickson
1
Accepted: 30 September 2020
#Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020
Abstract
Objectives Social approach and avoidance goalswhich refer to individual differencesinthedesiretopursuere-
wards versus avoid negative experiences in social relationshipshave numerous implications for the health and
quality of social relationships. Although endorsement of these goals largely arises from peoples pre-dispositions
towards approach and avoidance, in this research, we proposed that meditation training has the potential to benefi-
cially influence the extent to which people adopt approach and avoidance goals. Specifically, we hypothesized that
individuals who were randomly assigned to receive training in mindfulness or loving-kindness meditation would
report differences in social approach and avoidance goals, as compared with those in a wait-list control condition,
and that these effects would be mediated by differences in positive and negative emotions.
Methods To examine these hypotheses, we drew upon a community-based, randomized intervention study of 138 midlife adults,
who were assigned to receive mindfulness training, loving-kindness training, or no training in meditation.
Results As compared with the control condition, results demonstrated that loving-kindness training was directly associated with
lower social avoidance goals, and indirectly associated with greater social approach goals, via enhanced positive emotion.
Conclusions These results suggest loving-kindness meditation is a means by which people can beneficially influence their
approach and avoidance tendencies, which likely plays an important role in enhancing their social relationships.
Keywords Approach motivation .Avoidance motivation .Meditation .Emotion .Relationships
When it comes to social relationships, motivation matters.
Social approach and avoidance goals refer individual differ-
ences in the extent to which people tend to pursue rewards
versus avoid threats in their close social relationships (Gable
2006; Gable and Impett 2012). These goals have important
implications for relational outcomes, with approach social
goals predicting a host of beneficial outcomes, and avoidance
goals generally predicting maladaptive outcomes (Bernecker
et al. 2019;Gable2006; Gable and Impett 2012;Impettetal.
2010;Kusteretal.2017). Given the centrality of healthy so-
cial relationships to mental and physical well-being (e.g.,
Holt-Lunstad et al. 2010; Santini et al. 2015), a key question
is the following: is it possible for people to actively shift their
social approach and avoidance tendencies? Although ap-
proach and avoidance social goals arise from biological and
life-course pre-dispositions (Gable 2006; Gable and Impett
2012), an emerging body of research suggests that the extent
to which people endorse approach versus avoidance goals can
shift depending on contextual factors (Abeyta et al. 2015;
Martiny and Nikitin 2019; Trew and Alden 2015). Despite
this, no previous research has examined whether people can
actively engage in behaviors that influence their approach and
avoidance tendencies. In this study, we drew on research and
theory from meditation and affective science (Creswell and
Lindsay 2014;Fredrickson2001; Fredrickson et al. 2008)to
propose that mindfulness and loving-kindness meditation
have the potential to beneficially influence the extent to which
people endorse social approach and avoidance goals. That is,
we suspected regular engagement in mindfulness or loving-
kindness meditation would, relative to a control condition,
promote greater identification with social approach goals
*Brian P. Don
briandon@unc.edu
1
Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North
Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-020-01517-0
/ Published online: 10 October 2020
Mindfulness (2021) 12:582–593
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
... We assume that disengagement is negatively related to a growth mindset, and it mediates between growth mindset and motivation to learn from criticism. Based on prior work on social avoidance (Don et al., 2021), it is possible to assume a negative link between disengagement with criticism and trait mindfulness. ...
Article
Full-text available
Objectives Growth mindset beliefs promote adaptive motivations to learn and challenge seeking; however, the learning process promoted by a growth mindset is not always positive. Adverse experiences may be especially true if one faces harsh criticism. However, mindfulness may be a potential adaptive mechanism in a situation that evokes harsh criticism. The present research examined the interplay between growth mindset beliefs and trait mindfulness regarding the motivation to learn from harsh criticism. Method We hypothesized that three forms of engagement with criticism (over-engagement, disengagement, and constructive engagement) could be potential setback-specific mediators between growth mindset, trait mindfulness, and motivation to learn from criticism. Cross-sectional, self-report methods have been used on a diverse Hungarian sample (n = 1469). Results We found that a growth mindset and trait mindfulness are positively and directly related to the motivation to learn from criticism. Having a growth mindset was unrelated to constructive engagement. At the same time, disengagement and over-engagement negatively mediated the link between a growth mindset and the motivation to learn from setbacks. In contrast, the link between trait mindfulness and learning from setbacks was negatively mediated by both disengagement and over-engagement and positively mediated by constructive engagement. Conclusions The results suggest that growth mindset beliefs do not let individuals disengage from criticism and may promote constructive or a potentially harmful form of over-engagement with criticism. Complementarily, trait mindfulness is associated with the struggling way of learning characterized by constructive engagement and inhibits the suffering path of learning characterized by over-engagement the criticism.
... Further details regarding this larger, NIH-supported experiment (R01CA170128) and previous analyses have been reported elsewhere(Barczak-Scarboro et al., 2021;Don, Algoe, & Fredrickson, 2021;Don, Van Cappellen, & Fredrickson, 2021;Fredrickson et al., 2017Fredrickson et al., , 2019Fredrickson et al., , 2021Major et al., 2018;Prinzing, Van Cappellen, & Fredrickson, 2023;Rice et al., 2020;Rice & Fredrickson, 2017).3 As an early version of the Perceived Positivity Resonance Scale, this trait measure included eight items, rather than the seven used in later versions. ...
Article
Full-text available
Pleasantness and meaningfulness are sometimes seen as opposing pursuits. Yet past research has found that the pursuit of meaning often leads to pleasure. In four longitudinal studies-three observational, one experimental, ranging from 5 weeks to 18 months-we investigated an inverse process, whereby specific kinds of pleasant states can foster a sense of meaning in life. We hypothesized that perceptions of positivity resonance, a form of coexperienced positive affect characterized by mutual care and synchrony, are experienced as particularly meaningful in the moment and, over time, build social resources (e.g., supportive relationships and communities) that foster an enduring sense of meaning in life. Results indicate that perceived positivity resonance is associated with perceived meaning both between- and within-persons, links that emerge independently of overall pleasant emotion and social interaction quantity. Perceived social resources mediate between-persons links, and changes in perceived social resources mediate longitudinal links. Overall, these findings suggest that coexperienced, caring, and synchronous pleasant states may be uniquely suited to cultivating a person's sense that life is meaningful. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).
... Indeed, during loving-kindness meditation, participants are instructed to direct warm, kind-hearted thoughts and well-wishes towards a series of other individuals, which theoretically cultivates the individual's innate capacity for compassion and kindness (Salzberg, 2002). As such, it is perhaps not surprising that prior empirical work has demonstrated that loving-kindness meditation beneficially contributes to greater social connectedness (Hutcherson et al., 2008), greater perceptions of social support (Fredrickson et al., 2008), and lower social avoidance motivation (Don et al., 2021a;Don et al., 2021b). While mindfulness and loving-kindness meditation share some similarities (e.g., they are both quiet, contemplative practices with an intentional focus point, such as the breath), one of the critical differences between the two is that mindfulness involves open and receptive attention towards all experiences occurring in the present moment, whereas loving-kindness meditation involves overtly cultivating compassion and goodwill, even if that was not the individual's natural experience in the present moment. ...
Article
Full-text available
Objectives Research demonstrates that meditation interventions tend to positively influence social well-being. Yet, prior research has exclusively examined meditation in relation to average levels of social outcomes (e.g., social connectedness), despite other work demonstrating variability or fluctuations in social functioning play a distinct role in contributing to well-being. This study examined the hypothesis that training in mindfulness meditation and loving-kindness meditation would predict lower variability in social connectedness, even accounting for their positive influence on average levels of social connectedness. Moreover, this study also examined the hypothesis that lower variability in positive and negative emotions would mediate the link between training in meditation and reduced variability in social connectedness. Methods These hypotheses were tested using a randomized study of 224 mid-life adults. Participants received training in either mindfulness or loving-kindness meditation for 6 weeks. They reported their daily social connectedness and emotions for 2 weeks prior to the training, 6 weeks during the training, and 3 weeks after the training. Results Consistent with hypotheses, results demonstrated that participants in both meditation groups reported lower variability in social connectedness across the course of the intervention, even accounting for average levels of connectedness. Moreover, lower positive and negative affective variability partially mediated the association between time (training in meditation) and reduced variability in social connectedness. Conclusions These results suggest that (a) meditation may help to smooth social ups and downs across time and that (b) it may do so via its association with reduced affective variability.
... Mindfulness interventions promote beneficial social outcomes, such as decreased loneliness (Creswell et al., 2012;Lindsay et al., 2019) and increased social engagement (Don et al., 2021;Lindsay et al., 2019). Further, dispositional mindfulness and related interventions are associated with prosocial factors, such as generosity, empathic concern, and perspective taking (Berry et al., 2018;Donald et al., 2019). ...
Article
Full-text available
Objectives Increasing evidence suggests that dispositional mindfulness is associated with health, well-being, and the quality of personal relationships. Mechanisms underlying these associations are of considerable current interest. Interpersonal processes may contribute to associations of mindfulness with social support and interpersonal conflict, and the interpersonal circumplex (IPC) and other aspects of interpersonal theory provide a framework for examining possible mediating processes. The present study factor analyzed multiple mindfulness-related scales to identify key components related to psychosocial outcomes. Also, we examined whether interpersonal style dimensions of control and affiliation contribute to associations of mindfulness factors with psychosocial outcomes.Methods Two undergraduate samples (total N = 614) completed self-report questionnaires related to dispositional mindfulness and interpersonal processes.ResultsFactor analyses identified broader mindfulness dimensions consistent with prior literature, which were associated with more social support and less interpersonal conflict. In mediational analyses, this association was by way of warmth as a component of interpersonal style in the case of social support, but not for conflict.Conclusions Interpersonal style contributes to the association of dispositional mindfulness with psychosocial outcomes relevant to health and adjustment. Aspects of the interpersonal perspective (e.g., transactional cycles) can provide an integrative framework and a guide to future research.
... Mindfulness meditation and loving-kindness meditation are known to carry particular benefits for emotional well-being, in addition to benefits for mental, physical, and relational well-being (Fredrickson et al., 2017;Creswell, 2017;Don et al., 2020;. ...
... Metta meditation which usually builds upon mindfulness meditation has been repeatedly shown to enhance prosocial behavior, increase psychological well-being, improve interpersonal relationships, and reduce symptoms of depression in clinical and nonclinical samples (Galante et al., 2014). Furthermore, a recent study compared the effects of metta and mindfulness meditation in non-clinical individuals and found that only metta but not mindfulness meditation was associated with reduced social avoidance goals and increased social approach goals during the intervention (Don et al., 2021). According to the broaden and build theory by Fredrickson (2004), metta meditation can trigger upward spirals of experiencing positive affect, widening consciousness, flexible thinking, and increase of behavioral resources to improve interpersonal relationships and psychological well-being. ...
Article
Full-text available
Objectives Current treatments for chronic depression have focused on reducing interpersonal problems and negative affect, but paid little attention to promoting prosocial motivation and positive affect. Following this treatment focus, the objective of the present study was to examine whether the combination of metta (Loving Kindness) group meditation and subsequent tailored individual therapy focusing on kindness towards oneself and others (metta-based therapy, MBT) shows greater improvements in depressive symptoms than a wait list control group in patients with chronic depression. Methods Forty-eight patients with DSM-5 persistent depressive disorder were randomly assigned to MBT or a wait list control condition. Outcome was assessed after group meditation, after subsequent individual therapy, and at 6-month follow-up. The primary outcome measure was an independent blind rating of depressive symptoms at post-test. Secondary outcome included changes in self-reported depression, behavioral activation, rumination, social functioning, mindfulness, compassion, and clinician-rated emotion regulation. Results Mixed-design analyses showed significant differences between MBT and WLC in changes from pre- to post-test in clinician-rated and self-rated depression, behavioral activation, rumination, social functioning, mindfulness, and emotion regulation. Most of the changes occurred during group meditation and were associated with large effect sizes. Improvements were maintained at 6-month follow-up. Conclusions The results provide preliminary support for the effectiveness of MBT in treating chronic depression. Trial Registration ISRCTN, ISRCTN97264476.
Article
Full-text available
Research on attachment theory holds that insecure attachment influences people's daily social and emotional experiences. Mindfulness meditation and loving-kindness meditation have been associated with improvements in physical and mental well-being often through their influence on emotion experience and regulation. Yet, little research has examined how emotional well-being may be improved in insecurely attached individuals through meditation practice. We suspected that the emotion profiles of anxious and avoidant attachment may shift with meditation training, both across time and on a particular day. Improving emotional well-being may be especially consequential for those most at risk for negative health outcomes in late life. A diverse community sample of midlife adults raised in low-SES homes (N = 113; 55% white, 87.5% female) completed daily emotion reports for 10 weeks, during which they received 6 weeks of meditation training, randomized to either loving-kindness or mindfulness meditation practice. Results from growth curve analyses revealed that individuals with greater attachment anxiety and randomized to mindfulness meditation reported significant increases over time in positive emotions alongside decreases in negative emotions. Those high in attachment avoidance reported significant decreases in negative emotions in both meditation groups. On the daily level, within-person dose-response analyses revealed that individuals with greater attachment anxiety showed the most consistent dose-response relations between the duration of either meditation practice and same-day increases in positive emotions and decreases in negative emotions. These findings highlight how meditation interventions can shift emotion profiles of insecurely attached midlife adults who are at heightened risk for late life chronic illnesses. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).
Article
Full-text available
In intimate relationships, greater social approach motivation is associated with a host of personal and relational benefits. Why is this the case? Although previous research suggests approach motivation primarily influences relational outcomes via increased exposure to positive relational events, in this research, based on approach-avoidance motivational theory, we revive the upward reactivity hypothesis, which suggests approach motivation upwardly enhances people's affective and relational experiences in response to positive social events. Specifically, we hypothesized that people with greater social approach motivation would react more positively to positively valenced interactions with their partner, and that this would occur even when accounting for their global levels of key outcomes. We tested these ideas across three studies. In all three studies, couples first reported their approach motivation toward the relationship, then engaged in a gratitude interaction. In Study 3, participants additionally engaged in a capitalization interaction, and provided nightly reports of positive relational events across the course of 14 days. We found robust support for the upward reactivity hypothesis: In lab-based interactions and in daily life, individuals with greater approach motivation reported enhanced outcomes in response to positive social events. We also found support for upward observability: When individuals were high in approach motivation, their partners observed them as experiencing greater positive emotion during the laboratory interactions. Moreover, we found evidence for upward crossover, as the upward reactivity experienced by people with greater approach motivation indirectly predicted enhanced partner outcomes. These results provide suggestive evidence that approach motivation can make already good relational moments extra sweet. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).
Article
Full-text available
Satisfying intimate relationships are crucial to human health and well-being. Yet even the best relationships include good days and bad ones, and when people experience bad days in terms of relationship satisfaction, it tends to undermine personal well-being. What can reduce the extent to which bad relational days spill over into personal well-being? Based on the Buddhist concept of impermanence, as well as modern theory and research examining mindfulness, we argue trait mindfulness renders people more aware and accepting of all forms of change, including to changes in their relationships. As such, we hypothesized that people with greater trait mindfulness would be less likely to experience decrements in personal well-being on days in which they experienced dips in relationship satisfaction. In a daily study of 80 couples across 14 days ( N = 1,798 observations), people experienced lower life satisfaction, greater negative emotions, and fewer positive emotions on days when they reported lower than their average relationship satisfaction, but this association was attenuated for people high in mindfulness. These results suggest trait mindfulness partially buffers the negative consequences of daily dips in relationship satisfaction.
Article
Full-text available
Significance Loneliness (i.e., feeling alone) and social isolation (i.e., being alone) are among the most robust known risk factors for poor health and accelerated mortality. Yet mitigating these social risk factors is challenging, as few interventions have been effective for both reducing loneliness and increasing social contact. Mindfulness interventions, which train skills in monitoring present-moment experiences with an orientation of acceptance, have shown promise for improving social-relationship processes. This study demonstrates the efficacy of a 2-wk smartphone-based mindfulness training for reducing loneliness and increasing social contact in daily life. Importantly, this study shows that developing an orientation of acceptance toward present-moment experiences is a critical mechanism for mitigating these social risk factors.
Article
Full-text available
Prior research demonstrates that growth belief, or the implicit view that relationships are successful as a function of effort and cultivation, is associated with a variety of positive relational outcomes. Mindfulness, similarly, predicts a host of positive relationships outcomes, yet the mechanisms by which mindfulness has this positive influence are currently unclear. This study bridges research on implicit theories of relationships and mindfulness by arguing that individuals with greater mindfulness are also more likely to endorse growth belief, which then has a positive influence on relationships. Across two independent studies (N = 96 in Study 1 and 139 in Study 2), results demonstrate that people with greater mindfulness are also more likely to endorse growth belief, and that this mediates the association between mindfulness and positive relationship outcomes. Results suggest that people with greater mindfulness tend to think about and approach their relationships in a more growth-minded way, which has positive implications for feelings of satisfaction and connectedness. © 2019
Article
Full-text available
Research has shown that social identity threat can have a broad variety of negative consequences. However, not much is known about the consequences of social identity threat on interpersonal relationships. In the present research, we hypothesize that experiencing social identity threat decreases people’s social approach motivation towards other people related to the stereotyped domain. Specifically, we manipulated social identity threat by activating negative stereotypes about women in math. As math is an important aspect of the academic self-concept, female university students who are confronted with a negative math stereotype should experience threat towards their identity as university students. We then tested whether this threat affected female students’ motivation to approach other university students and whether the effect was mediated by a reduced sense of belonging to the university. Data from 478 participants, assessed in three experimental (Study 1a: N = 79, Study 1b: N = 164; Study 2: N = 100) and one correlational study (Study 3: N = 135), mainly supported these hypotheses. We conclude that social identity threat can be detrimental to the quality of people’s social lives.
Article
Full-text available
Objective: Over the last 10 years, there has been a dramatic increase in published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of brief mindfulness training (from single-session inductions to multisession interventions lasting up to 2 weeks), with some preliminary indications that these training programs may improve mental health outcomes, such as negative affectivity. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate whether brief mindfulness training reliably reduces negative affectivity. Method: PubMed, PsycINFO, and the Mindfulness Research Monthly Newsletter were systematically searched for brief mindfulness intervention RCTs assessing negative affectivity outcomes (e.g., depression, rumination, anxiety, stress). Sixty-five RCTs, including 5,489 participants predominantly without experience in meditation (64.64% female, mean age = 24.62), qualified for the meta-analytic review. Results: The meta-analysis revealed a small but significant effect of brief mindfulness training on reducing negative affectivity compared to control programs (g = .21, p < .001). The overall effect size was significantly moderated by participant characteristics: community samples (g = .41, p < .001) produced larger training effects compared to student samples (g = .14, p = .001; Qbetween p = .03). No significant effect size differences were found between clinical and nonclinical samples. However, when accounting for publication bias, the overall effect size of brief mindfulness training programs on negative affectivity was significantly reduced (g = .04). Conclusions: Brief mindfulness training programs are increasingly popular approaches for reducing negative affectivity. This meta-analysis indicates that brief mindfulness training modestly reduces negative affectivity. Quantitative analyses indicated the presence of publication bias (i.e., unpublished null effect studies), highlighting the need to continue rigorous evaluation of brief mindfulness interventions. (PsycINFO Database Record
Article
Full-text available
Partners in romantic relationships differ in the extent to which they are oriented towards positive outcomes (e.g., intimacy) or away from negative outcomes (e.g., conflict). The present study examines these approach-avoidance relationship goals in relation to self-reported relationship problems, stress communication, and dyadic coping. Hypotheses were tested on a dyadic level (Actor-Partner Interdependence Model) using data from 368 couples. As expected, people endorsing approach goals reported fewer relationship problems, more effective stress communication, and better dyadic coping. People endorsing avoidance goals reported more relationship problems and poorer dyadic coping. Further, approach-oriented people tended to perceive their partner as being more communicative and more supportive, whereas avoidance-oriented people tended to perceive their partner as more communicative but less supportive. Reports by partners agreed with the self-reports of approach- and avoidance-oriented spouses concerning stress communication and dyadic coping. These findings highlight motivational factors in general, and orientation towards approach-avoidance goals in particular, as key features in understanding relationship maintenance.
Article
Approach motivation (striving for desired end-states, eagerly focusing on where one wants to be) is often held up as the best type of motivation: It feels good and is associated with many positive outcomes. Indeed, a common perception is that regulation in terms of approach motivation is almost always better than regulation in terms of avoidance motivation. However, as we discuss, this conclusion is worthy of a deeper look. We consider how approach and avoidance motivation manifest at different levels in a self-regulatory hierarchy and how this can help us understand the upsides and downsides of both approach and avoidance motivation. In other words, approach motivation is not always beneficial and avoidance motivation is not always problematic. Understanding these trade-offs involves a consideration of which level in the hierarchy approach or avoidance is manifested, what types of outcomes are being examined (the experience of regulation vs. performance), and how the approach or avoidance regulation fits or does not fit with an individual’s broad concerns or specific situational demands. Furthermore, a hierarchical approach helps make sense of behaviors that reflect simultaneous approach and avoidance tendencies, such as tactical approach to remove (avoid) a threat, providing a dynamic and nuanced view of motivation.
Article
Combinations of multiple meditation practices have been shown to reduce the attrition of telomeres, the protective caps of chromosomes (Carlson et al., 2015). Here, we probed the distinct effects on telomere length (TL) of mindfulness meditation (MM) and loving-kindness meditation (LKM). Midlife adults (N = 142) were randomized to be in a waitlist control condition or to learn either MM or LKM in a 6-week workshop. Telomere length was assessed 2 weeks before the start of the workshops and 3 weeks after their termination. After controlling for appropriate demographic covariates and baseline TL, we found TL decreased significantly in the MM group and the control group, but not in the LKM group. There was also significantly less TL attrition in the LKM group than the control group. The MM group showed changes in TL that were intermediate between the LKM and control groups yet not significantly different from either. Self-reported emotions and practice intensity (duration and frequency) did not mediate these observed group differences. This study is the first to disentangle the effects of LKM and MM on TL and suggests that LKM may buffer telomere attrition.
Article
Approach relationship goals are pursued in order to achieve desired outcomes, whereas avoidance relationship goals are pursued to prevent undesirable outcomes in relationships. We investigated how partners’ approach and avoidance relationship goals are related to their nonverbal communication during conflict. A sequential analysis of observational data from 365 couples (28,470 observations) revealed that individuals with more (vs. fewer) approach goals displayed more positive involvement (e.g., head nods, smiles) and less avoidant withdrawal (e.g., shaking head, folded arms). The reverse pattern emerged for avoidance goals. Furthermore, women (but not men) matched their partner's positive involvement to a greater extent the more approach goals and the fewer avoidance goals they pursued. In contrast, approach/avoidance relationship goals were not associated with how much individuals matched their partner's avoidant withdrawal. Results suggest that relationship goals are related to partners’ nonverbal communication and the extent to which women match their partner's positive involvement during conflict. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.