... The performance of the proposed tracker has been evaluated based on two performance metrics, the Area-Underthe-Curve (AUC) and the Distance Precision (DP). For the validation of the proposed tracker's performance, a comparison has been carried out based on trackers presented in previous works: ASLA [37], CSK [38], DSST [30], MEEM [39], MUSTER [40], SAMF [41], SRDCF [27], Struck [42], siamfc3s [43], HCFTs [4], HDT [11], Staple [44], CNN-SVM [45], CF2 [3], LCT [46], KCF [32], TLD [47], KCF_GaussHog [32],KCF_LinearHog [32], BACF [48], DeepSRDCF [49], DRVT [50], MemDTC [51], MemTrack [51], SRDCFdecon [52]. The obtained results, corresponding to the two considered performance metrics, have been shown by two curves for One-Pass Evaluation (OPE), such as the DP rate vs. the location error threshold which measures the proportion of frames with distance between the tracking results and the ground truth less than a certain number of pixels, and the success rate vs. the overlap threshold which describes the percentage of successful frames as shown in Figures 4 and 5 for the OBT50 and OBT100 datasets respectively. ...