Our Cosmos = Holographic 4D-Spherical Standing Wave

Abstract

The breakthrough perspective afforded by this simple paradigm-of viewing the cosmos as a 4D Onion, implemented as a hyperspherical standing wave-suddenly our universe becomes de-mystified! Starting from a higher-dimensional perspective of viewing the grand-scale of the Cosmic Onion as being the context in which our universe experiences Space~Time expansion. It goes on to describe the most fundamental details of the invisible sub-microscopic quantum world. It does so by labeling these tiny geometric wave-constructs with the fundamental physical constants that make up the CODATA database and whose values and experimental backing are exhaustively documented at the National Institute of Standards and Technology website NIST.gov. Amazingly, once we have described this foundational model, we will ask the model questions, that have perplexed mainstream science for centuries, and the model, ITSELF, will answer those questions. But, unlike scientific tradition, it will not stop at describing the behavior of physical phenomena, but will explain, fundamental aspects about how the universe works. We will ask the model to resolve the confusion concerning mystical concepts like: "particle-wave duality", "action at a distance", "Dark Matter" and "Dark Energy" and even resolve "relativity paradoxes." We'll ask it to explain photons, matter, Gravity, Electromagnetism as well as the Strong & Weak interactions ALL as being manifestations of these "truly fundamental" quantum-wave constructs. = = = = =

Full text

College Park, MD 2013 PROCEEDINGS of the NPA
1
Our Cosmos = Holographic 4D-Spherical Standing Wave
by: John Wsol
1406 Calle Alcazar, San Clemente, CA 92672
e-mail: JohnWsol@MysteriesOfTheUniverse.info
With extensive editing by NPA member: Michael Studencki of Żywiec, Poland
The breakthrough perspective afforded by this simple paradigm -- of viewing the cosmos as a
4D Onion, implemented as a hyperspherical standing wave -- suddenly our universe becomes de-
mystified! Starting from a higher-dimensional perspective of viewing the grand-scale of the Cos-
mic Onion as being the context in which our universe experiences Space~Time expansion. It goes
on to describe the most fundamental details of the invisible sub-microscopic quantum world. It
does so by labeling these tiny geometric wave-constructs with the fundamental physical constants
that make up the CODATA database and whose values and experimental backing are exhaustively
documented at the National Institute of Standards and Technology website NIST.gov.
Amazingly, once we have described this foundational model, we will ask the model questions,
that have perplexed mainstream science for centuries, and the model, ITSELF, will answer those
questions. But, unlike scientific tradition, it will not stop at describing the behavior of physical
phenomena, but will explain, fundamental aspects about how the universe works. We will ask the
model to resolve the confusion concerning mystical concepts like: “particle-wave duality”, “action
at a distance”, “Dark Matter” and “Dark Energy” and even resolve “relativity paradoxes.” We’ll
ask it to explain photons, matter, Gravity, Electromagnetism as well as the Strong & Weak interac-
tions ALL as being manifestations of these “truly fundamental” quantum-wave constructs.
=====
1. Introduction
As Earthlings we see only surface manifestations of the uni-
verse in and around us. Our minds become aware of time by
correlating past memories with present moment observations
1.1 Higher Perspective is the Key to Understanding
In order to grasp the Universe, our mind’s eye must trans-
cend the dimensionality of Space~Time. In addition to 3D space
our model needs TIME as one of its geometric dimensions.
Cosmic Onion: not to scale, the layers are really super-fine
The Cosmic Onion paradigm enables us to envision our ever-
expanding Universe “as an outside observer”, as we can see in
Figure 1. It employs a shape of a 4D hypersphere with layers to
represent the whole Cosmos: past, present and future.
Cosmic~Time is the radial direction in spherical geometry.
Starting from the center, it is an integer count of layers outward.
The spherical layers (3D slices through the 4D Hypersphere) are
the spatial dimensions, each representing a particular moment in
time. They are separated one Planck-time from each other. At the
core, is the Cosmic Microwave Background (which is how our
Universe looked just as it became transparent); the outer dark-
ness is waiting for “Now” to arrive.
Think of each Onion-layer as being thin holographic film – as
the Universe expands, each layer could image the Universe, re-
taining a trace of every individual particle.
1.2 Aether or not?
If a cubic meter of the “Vacuum” were truly empty it would
have one-and-only-one property: a “cubic-meter of nothingness”
– incapable of carrying light waves. However, the
Space~Time Medium has at least 4 properties even BEFORE we
count the 5 Planck units.
Consider a stretched 2D drum membrane or 3D flask of water
being suction pumped – an elastic fluid, under negative pressure
(enabling transverse waves). This is the state of the Space~Time
Medium; the context in which all quantum wave phenomena
exist, including the wave constructs that create and persist
“particles” of matter.
The Cosmic Onion hypersphere is a wave medium. It is a
standing wave constructed by concentric inward + outward
waves – passing through each other – cancelling out “apparent”
motion – each layer 180-degrees out-of-phase of the next.

Wsol: Our Cosmos = Holographic 4D-Spherical Standing Wave Vol. 10
2
1.3 Space~Time with a Twist
Once I noticed the RATIO
between the Magnetic Force
constant, Km(1x10-7 N(s/C)2) and μ0
was 4π-- the rest of the Cosmic
Puzzle pieces fell in place.
The period of each oscillation =
Planck-time, about 5.38x10-44 of a
second; this defines the “thinness”
of each layer.
Given this geometry we can
already ask our first question:
Q: What is the differential of these
standing-wave wavelets as they
pass through each other?
A: They are transverse waves
circularly oscillating, so:

  
   
0
( 2 )
2 4
m mmK
K K
(1)
The model’s geometry explains that Magnetic Permeability of
Space (μ0) is caused by these inward versus outward concentric,
rotationally oscillating, standing waves. The Magnetic Force
constant is the 1st and most fundamental and the geometries,
herein, put a constraint upon these other values:
(Let mean “yields” and also defines a cause-to-effect relationship.)
 

     
0
0
1
4
m o
K c Z c (2)
 

 
 
2
00
1
4
e
c K
(3)
The light that we can see is electromagnetic waves propagating
on the surface to the Now-Manifold. Its speed is expressed as
linear-distance/unit of time, i.e. 299,792,458 meters/second.
Quantum physics talks about higher-dimensions being
curled-up[1]smaller than the Planck-length[2]– and, there is a
debate within the physics community whether or not “time” is a
“dimension.”[3]The Cosmic Onion Model resolves BOTH these
questions.
1) It models forward-time as being all the normal-vectors (a
right-angle line to these Onion-Layers pointing upward.)
2) Because these layers are rotationally oscillating, think of
each normal-vector as being caught-up in these oscillations,
like tiny twisted springs.
1.4 Big Flash… Rather than a Big Bang
Cosmos means Order; the geometry of the whole 4D Onion.
Whereas, Universe is all of Space as it exists in a single moment,
the single 3D wavefront expanding within this 4D spherical
Space~Time context.
To help envision a sphere expanding inside a hypercube,
consider the yellow inner sphere, being the universe at half its
current size; expanding to the outer green sphere, representing
the universe at its current size / age. Like a pebble in a pond, the
“Big Flash”, beginning from the center of our Cosmic Onion,
initially this abrupt (one Planck-
time thin) ever-expanding 3D wave-
front; defining the moment called
“Now”, and established the
direction that time flows.
The expansion of
the Universe
IS
one-and-the-same
AS
the forward flow of
time itself!
Analogous to the 2D surface ten-
sion of the abrupt density difference
between air and water, while ex-
panding, it encounters resistance, as
it penetrates the Cosmic Onion-
layers. Science calls this resistance
the Impedance of Free Space, Z0. This resistance is what regu-
lates expansion; literally regulating the rate time proceeds for-
ward. Slice a plane through the center and discover the Great
Circle circumference of this expanding sphere grows at 2×speed-
of-light.
Analogous to the 2D surface tension of the abrupt density
difference between air and water, this “Now” wavefront, as we
introduce matter, morphs its 3D-surface, develops dents,
becoming a 4D Manifold = all of space as it exists right now.
Therefore, from now on, we will call it the “Now-Manifold”.
Now-Manifold = The Unified Field
≈ Einstein’s Spacetime manifold.
The table below sumarizes the inward+outward standing
waves; showing the “affinity” the Now-Manifold has for the
outward righthand twisting of the forward time direction. This
goes along with the right-hand rule for current vs. B-field.
Cosmic Onion
Clocks Time Handedness
& Direction Angle
Forward will be
Future Right - ↑ positive°
Now-
Manifold Is Now Right - ↑ positive°
Backward was the
Past Right - ↓negative°
1.5 Invisible Symmetry Revealed
For gravity, electric and magnetic forces the 3 familiar New-
ton force equations are the same form, yet have different con-
stants of proportionality: G, Keand Km. In the equation table
below notice the dimensional units; factoring out Newtons re-
veals symmetry and the need for the missing KΘ. Notice how
(m/kg)2= (s/kg)2xc2., where c2is the conversion factor for mass-
to-energy and (m/C)2= (s/C)2xc2, where c2also converts tem-
poral displacement of magnetic polarity (s/C)2to its spatial elec-
tric charge potential (m/C) 2.

College Park, MD 2013 PROCEEDINGS of the NPA
3
In the table: A=Amperes, C=Coulombs, c=speed-of-light, h=Planck’s
constant, ε0=electric permittivity, f=frequency, N=Newtons = force =
mass * acceleration; kg=kilograms, m=meters, s=seconds, F=Farads,
N(s/C)2is equivalent to N/A2.
Table 1: Space~Time / Mass~Charge Equation Matrix
Inter-
action
Distance = Time × c
hf = Energy
N(m)
= Mass
[kg]
× c2
Matter /w
Space
~Time
G[N(m/kg)2]
6.67384x10-11
[kg m3s2]
=KΘ [N(s/kg)2]
7.425648x10-28
[m/kg]
× c2
EM /w
Matter
Ke[N(m/C)2]
8.9875518x109
[m3kg/s2/C2]
= Km[N(s/C)2]
1x10-7
[m kg/C2]
× c2
Wave
Propaga-
tion
1/ε0
1/8.8541878x10-12
[m/F]
= µ0
1.256637061x10-6
[N/A2]
× c2
Q: What’s the big deal with Kθ?
A: KΘis unique in that it relates the ratio of a distance-to-mass, to
the very subtle yet profound temporal slope in the Now-
Manifold. It is central to unifying gravitation with electro-
magnetism as demonstrated in this equation set:
2
2
2
m
m
Kq
G e
K K
c m m


  
   
   
   

 
(4)
where, α=Fine-structure constant, e=Fundamental Charge, ql= Planck
Charge. Also, when you substitute the Planck-mass into
Schwarzschild’s solution to Einstein’s field equation you get KΘ
times two unit-masses:
2
( ) 2 / ( )
s l
r m Gm c K m m

  
  
(5)
mlis the Planck-mass, KΘis the quantum factor defining how
much a given mass slows down Space~Time expansion: N(s/kg)2.
2. Quantum Leap into the sub-microscopic world
2.1 “One tiny-step for a man –
One Quantum Leap for mankind.”
Q: Not so fast! “N(s/kg)2?” “Quantum factor”? “Space-Time expan-
sion”? “Schwartzchild soloution to Eistein’s equations”?How
are all these ideas in these equations?
A: By factoring out force as in “N(s/kg)2” this represents the slope
in the Now-Manifold that corresponds to the curvature ex-
pressed by rls.KΘ, in “quantum-scale” Planck-units, shown
side-by-side with rsl, the Schwarzschild radius given Planck-
mass yields:
 
   
 

 

2
; 2 2
( ) /
s
K K m m
m
r Gm c
(6)
KΘ times two Planck-masses equals 2 Planck-lengths = rsl,.
The (s/kg)2speaks of time itself being slowed down by the in-
teraction of two separate masses.
Q: Two separate masses? KΘ(ml+ml)?
Why not just write this as 2KΘml?
A: It’s to make you aware that these are two separate masses on
two adjacent Onion-layers…
<-past-OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO--future-->
>>Now^Manifold >>
Looking along a radial timeline, the circles above represent
the tiny cross-section of Onion-layers showing the amount they
oscillate relative to the adjacent layers. They are created within
the elasticity of the oscillating Onion Layers. Their circular vi-
brations would look like spheres rotating in-n-out of the page
1.855x1044 times per second (the reciprocal of the Planck-time, tl=
5.391x10-44 of a second). This defines the “thinness” of each layer.
The mass of the volume of one-second’s worth of these virtual
spheres = 2.17641x10-5 grams – the Planck-mass, denoted as ml.
The mass of one of these virtual Planck-spheres is:
2
48
1.1733 10
/
(1 / ) c
grams sphere
m t sphere t 

  
 
 
  
(7)
2.2 Connecting Large-Scale Structure with QM
Quantum Physics was born from Maxwell Planck’s discovery
that energy is emitted and absorbed in discrete increments of
energy now called Planck’s constant, denoted by h. As we will
soon see, the Cosmic Onion’s geometry, sub-dividing
Space~Time, IS the fundamental reason behind this incremental
nature of quantum phenomena.
2.3 Every Wave-Action has an Equal Wave-Reaction
These tiny Planck-spheres oscillate amplitude = their radius,
relative to themselves, but twice that relative to the adjacent lay-
er. Thus the circumference of 2πbecomes a difference of 4π.
The energy it takes for the Now-Manifold to penetrate each
Onion-layer is its reaction of having encountered the angular
momentum of these Planck-spheres. Note ħhas units of angu-
lar momentum = Length2Mass/Time, being the cross-section area
of rotation times the mass of 1-sphere-per-oscillation time.
Q: Should CERN be concerned about this?
A: Yes, because THIS is the quantum active-reactive interaction
of matter-waves with the Onion-layers, the cause of mass and
reactive interaction with the Now-manifold creates quantum
gravity. This will be explained more when we get to Matter.
This indisputably simple and mathematically precise
explanation for the manifestation of Mass and its reac-
tion being the fundamental cause of Gravity makes the
Higgs boson and gravitons completely unnecessary.
×4π


Wsol: Our Cosmos = Holographic 4D-Spherical Standing Wave Vol. 10
4
3 An Absolute Context for Relativity
3.1 Mach’s Principle meets the Cosmic Onion
When the centerline of a spring-shaped particle wave is per-
pendicular to the Onion-Layers – the “particle” is at rest! Con-
ceptually, the Cosmic Onion Model has the unique ability to
have an absolute reference frame – the Onion-Layers themselves
provide an absolute coordinate in time. By virtue of the normal
vectors to the Onion-layer, conceptually this gives us a reference
for absolute rest. Rather than the distant “stars” being a “frame
of reference” each Cosmic Onion-layer is the “preferred local
reference-frame” – the basis for gauging physical properties and
laws. THIS is Mach’s Principle taken to perfection.
Table 2: Three different red/blue shifts for three relativities.
Relativity Type of Red/Blue Shift Phenomena
Special Doppler Shift: caused by an objects motion through
SPACE. This happens instantaneously: blue-
shifting in front and red-shifting behind. This af-
fect
s
both emitted & r
e
ceiving waves.
General Redshift happens while light emerges from a mas-
sive object. Blueshift happens while light enters
into a gravity wall. Bending occurs as it passes
thru space curved by a massive object.
Cosmo-
logical
This cause of Redshift NOT motion objects through
space, but is of SPACE itself expanding through
TIME. This happens slowly over the entire dura-
tion of the lights journey. The net effect is a meas-
ure of the percentage the universe has grown since
time light was emitted from its source to the time it
is received at a destination.
3.2 Special Relativity and Doppler Effect
Einstein introduced Special Relativity in his 1905 paper “On
the Electro Dynamics of Moving Bodies”. Given this idea that
every electron, proton & neutron that makes up an object has
electro-dynamic properties, consider this crude diagram.
This simplified illustration is a tiny cross-section of
Space~Time. The near future is the top purple section of the dia-
gram while the bottom represents the past. The center section
represents the amount the universe expands in 1 second. The
horizontal lines represent the quantum thin Cosmic Onion-layers
though the lines and gaps are not drawn to scale. In reality they
are so fine that they sub-divide an individual proton by 19 orders
of magnitude. The “springs” are the oscillating wave-functions
that represent particles of matter. Remember, the “size” of a par-
ticle is the amplitude of the wave oscillations (charge radius) and
the “mass” of a particle is proportionate to the number of wave-
oscillations per second. The spring on the left is a particle at rest
determined by the centerline of the spring intersecting the On-
ion-layers at a right angle, thus having the minimal number of
oscillations per second. This is what physicists call “the rest mass
of a particle.” The middle spring-wave shows more oscillations
fitting into the same 1 second time gap and represents a particle
moving at about 20% of the speed of light. The right most spring
represents a particle moving at about half the speed of light.
From the viewpoint of an observer at rest, the additional oscilla-
tions per second means the particles appears to the stationary
observer to manifest more mass. But, from the particle’s view-
point (or co-moving observer) the duration of a second is less, so
the particle always sees itself as manifesting its rest mass.
Doppler Shift happens the instant that light is received and being
emitted; compressing wavelengths in front and stretching wave-
lengths behind. This is an entirely separate phenomenon from
Cosmological redshift, which happens slowly the entire duration
of the light’s journey. This important distinction is missing from
most scientific literature. Most writings mentioning Doppler
shift in a cosmological context mistakenly attribute this to rela-
tive velocities and leaving the reader oblivious that Doppler is
always two separate instantaneous occurrences.
3.3 General Relativity and Gravitational Red/Blue Shift
In and near large collections of matter, like planets or stars,
the interaction of the spring-shaped waves that persist particles
of matter cause quantum-scale jitter motion. This is a kind of
quantum-scale thermodynamics that “fractalizes” the Now-
manifold. This fractalization’s lower limits are the Planck-units.
Thus the COM accommodates QM’s renormalization – where the
Planck unit cutoff keeps calculations from yielding infinite quan-
tities.[4] The fractalized path along the time-dimension slows the
Now-Manifolds expansion -- with diminishing effect as the in-
verse-square of the distance from the object. This creates a tem-
poral dent in the Now-Manifold in and around the object. The
temporal slope of this dent, as it penetrates the Impedance of the
Onion-Layers, manifests as the gravitational field. The temporal
slope near Earth’s surface is about 9.80665 meters/second/second.
The more massive an object is; the deeper the Now-Manifold
dent. The denser the object is; the steeper the temporal slope.
The steeper the slope the greater the effect of the Onion layers’
Impedance has on manifesting gravitational field strength.
Light traversing a “gravity well” gets bent spatially. Wave-
length compresses while entering and stretched while exiting.
T I M E
1
-
second
T I M E
T I M E

College Park, MD 2013 PROCEEDINGS of the NPA
5
This “gravitational” space-curvature is relative to the Onion-
layers “cosmological” curvature.
Q: What is the Pioneer 10 & 11 “anomaly” & what causes it?
A: These spacecraft where tracked for about 30 years, carefully
monitoring their positions, primarily by Doppler Shift and tim-
ing their radio signals. Measurements showed they seemed to
have a slight acceleration component (8.74±1.33)×10-8 cm/s2
that put them off position by 3.000 miles per year closer to the
Sun than calculations. [5] The explanation is this: they are not
tied to Earth-Sun Space~Time reference-frame, and are moving
faster than escape velocity leaving our solar system’s gravity
well. They are really at the position that scientist think they
are, but in a reference frame “drifting” 16.1 seconds per year
relative to our Earth-based reference frame.
Q: Can this model explain why gyroscopes lose weight?
A: Four steps: First, stop thinking about gravity as if it is a fun-
damental cause; it is an observable effect of temporal distor-
tion. Second, inertia “persists” the spinning gyro; keeping the
atoms in a state of constant acceleration towards the center.
Third, the velocity of this rotation creates Doppler Shift effect
which tilts the Now-Manifold in a cone shape. Forth, this
changes the net temporal slope of the Now-Manifold so that its
slope is lessened, thus it is affected less while penetrating the
resistance of the Cosmic Onion-layers. Thus, the EFFECT that
we call gravity is decreased.
4. The Dark Side of the Cosmos
4.1 Dark Matter
Dark Matter [6] was an idea put forth by Fritz Zwicky in 1933
to try to explain why spiral galaxies had higher rotational veloci-
ties than their mathematical models predicted. The idea caught
on and has been extended to try to explain star formation from
clouds of hydrogen gas. His idea was to distribute the Dark Mat-
ter in and around the haloes of galaxies to keep their mathemati-
cal models of gravity from breaking.
The Cosmic Onion Model says: Matter MUST STRONGLY in-
teract with the Now-Manifold in order to fractalize (jitter motion)
its 3D surface. This should lay to rest any notion of Weakly In-
teracting Matter Particles. Do not confuse Dark Matter with the
density of the Space~Time Medium for each is defined and dis-
tributed differently. Cosmic Onion mass is throughout
Space~Time -- lower density in the past and in gravity wells;
higher “relative” density in the future.”
Our solar system, concentrates 99%+ of its mass in the Sun.
So the temporal slope is totally dominated by the Sun and tills
towards the sun. Galaxies, on the other hand, SPREAD OUT
their mass unevenly. Higher density in the center halo area, less
along the spiral arms, and lesser still in the gaps between the
arms. This causes the Now-Manifold, itself, to become a spiral
shaped vortex. The net effect is, stars do not “fall” towards the
center of the galaxy; but, the local slope in the Now-Manifold
says they are falling, primarily, towards the inner contours of the
Now-Manifold vortex. This rotating twist in Space~Time ex-
plains spiral arm stability.
Cosmological Relativity is the Predominate Cause of
Redshift of Light from Distant Galaxies.
Both space and clock-rates expand as time proceeds forward.
ALL natural processes are slowing proportional to the reciprocal
of the age of “the volume of space” the object occupies. Even the
atoms within an object expand as space itself expands, albeit
slower than the surrounding space. Cosmological redshift hap-
pens slowly while light is in-transit. Unlike Doppler, which can
indicate relative velocity, Cosmological redshift is an indication
of how much the universe grew from the time light left its source
to when it arrives at a destination. Since clock-rates continually
grow this dramatically effects our perceptions of time and of the
age of the universe. Each time the universe doubles in size its
perceived age increases by 144.69% = 1/ln(2). Each doubling
takes 2*1.4469 in perceived age of the universe.

Wsol: Our Cosmos = Holographic 4D-Spherical Standing Wave Vol. 10
6
4.2 Dark Energy
The Cosmos is NOT Euclidean Geometry. When we look out
into the universe we are NOT seeing outer space – we are seeing
into the depths of times past when the universe was smaller.
Slicing a plane through the Cosmic Onion, we get the diagram
shown below. Notice that all the light we see from distant galax-
ies comes from the past when the universe was smaller. But this
means that everything in the universe is expanding!
Covariant Space~Time Metric
(1) The speed of light is determined by the properties of the
Space~Time Medium = 299,792,458 meters/second within
each reference frame. Note that speed is a RATIO: distance
per unit-of-time. This does not mean distance is fixed nor
does it mean clock rates are fixed.
(2) What this DOES mean is that with the forward flow of time, a
meter expands by some amount while the duration of one
second changes by the same ratio.
What does it mean to scale time? (#1) Are we scaling our per-
ception of the passage of time? Or, (#2) are we scaling the met-
rics by which Space & Time are
measured? Answer: First, by
scaling the space & time metrics
this causes our perceptions of
both to be warped. Dark Energy
and accelerated expansion is an
illusion caused by a wrong un-
derstanding of Cosmic Geome-
try. The truth is: as we expand
the Earth slows along with all
clocks and processes, thus as we
compare our local Space~Time
with the distant past it only
SEEMS as if the universe is ac-
celerating.
4.3 Dark Flow
Deep space observations be-
tween the constellations of Cen-
taurs and Vela show that galax-
ies in that region of space appear
to be merging towards point.
How does the Cosmic Onion
Model explain this weird phe-
nomenon? That particular direc-
tion represents the opposite side
of the Cosmic Hypersphere. As
the universe expands that is the
point from which we are ex-
panding away from the fastest.
(Those galaxies are in the distant
past, were smaller than a Euclid-
ian perspective would think.)
Imagine, at the bottom-center
of this Space~Time diagram, a
very distant galaxy when the
universe was half its current size
but ln 2 or ~69.3% of its current
age. The orange circle represents the Now-manifold when light
left that galaxy. The stair-stepped blue and purple curves repre-
sent light leaving the galaxy in opposite directions. The entire
duration of the journey stretches the light, while clock-rates con-
tinually slow, thus always keeping c constant. Our Milky Way
galaxy is at the top at the intersection of the yellow “Now-
manifold” and can observe light from the very distant galaxy by
photographing it from in-front or from behind just by turning
our telescope about 180-degrees around. The intersection and the
bottom of the diagram is the point of Dark Flow between the
constellations of Centaurs and Vela. Note this model does not
need to add something new to predict “Dark Flow”. Unlike some
current speculations, it is not because something is sucking those
galaxies into the distant void, rather it is we ourselves moving
away from the opposite side of the 4D spherical universe.
One prediction of this model is that this same convergence or
emergence that we call Dark Flow should be observable in same
direction as Centaurs & Vela –OR- in the opposite direction but
look for this phenomenon to “appear” in the WMAP image.

College Park, MD 2013 PROCEEDINGS of the NPA
7
5. Particle-Wave Duality?
Table 3: Brief Overview Photons, Matter, Neutrinos
Photons
₪ Spirally polarized quantized wave-snippets, spreading
forth on the surface of the Now-Manifold propagating along
its circumference, between Onion-layers. Photons stair-step
like Planck-length inchworms “Plancking” their way along
a spiral staircase pathway from the depths of the past to-
wards the future. Per inverse square-law, photons can inter-
act with matter waves via electromagnetic induction.
Matter
Waves

Tightly coiled spring-shaped waves that propagate, pri-
marily, along the time dimension. They manifest mass as
they penetrate the Onion-layers. They manifest charge as
dispersion of angular momentum.
Neutri-
nos
• Highly energetic waves that travel just behind (inside) the
Now-Manifold. So they DO NOT interact Electromagneti-
cally. In order for them to influence other matter waves
requires a direct hit.
5.1 What is a photon, really?
Photon=hc. Photons have a definite macro-scale geometry and
an interesting, incremental, quantum behavior. The equation be-
low explains what a photon is and how it behaves. Note the curvy
equal sign with forward and reverse arrows -- denotes an oscil-
lating system. The mixing of Planck and SI units, on either side
of the oscillating equal sign, is to emphasize how this sub-
microscopic cause produces the net macroscopic effect.
2 2
xy xy
z z
Photon h c
m m kg
m
h c
t t s s
   
 
 
   
 
 
 
   
 
   


 


(8)
In this example zis the direction of wave-propagation; xy is
the oscillation-axis of this transverse oscillating wavefront; h, is
its incremental angular momentum; lxy2is the incremental surface
area growth while it propagates distance lzfor each time incre-
ment, tl; resulting in (metersxy2) surface propagating at light-speed.
A mix of alternating left-₪-right photons suggests that the On-
ion-layers may, in fact, be odd and even, alternately carrying
inter-₪-woven, spiral polarized photons.
 
23
3
0
d
txy zd
Light hct
m
m kg
h c dt
t t s
   
 

   
 
 
 
 
 


 

(9)
where tdis the time-duration, Light is the sum total effect of the
photon energy radiating outward along the surface of the Now-
manifold, for a total distance of c∙td.
5.2 Cosmic Context for Space~Time and Energy~Matter.
The Cosmic Onion sub-divides the 4D volume into time
quanta (durations of 1 Planck-time). All EM-waves ride the sur-
face of the Now-Manifold. At a quantum-scale, even “non-
polarized light” is a mix of left-₪-right handed spirally polarized
photons.
a) The Cosmic Onion-layers act as a conduit for the Now-
Manifold as it carries photons of light, radio waves and, in-
deed, the entire Electromagnetic spectrum. The natural pro-
gression of photon-snippets travel between adjacent layers --
for half-an-instant -- these layers alternate; allowing left-hand
spirally polarized photons to “ride” the surface of the Planck-
spheres to the next pair of adjacent Onion-layers. Then next
half-time quantum the right-hand spirally polarized photons
do the same. And the process repeats. Photon-waves ride
along the surface of the Planck-spheres and don’t actually
have to penetrate them so they DO NOT manifest mass.
(Contrast this with matter-waves which DO have to penetrate
the Planck-spheres.)
b) This is the root cause of why a “particle” needs to be rotated
720-degrees before it returns to its initial “spin state”. 360-
degrees only leaves it in a “sign reversed” spin state. [7]
c) All Electromagnetic propagation occurs on the surface of the
Now-Manifold. All EM force interactions are the result of the
shape of the Now-Manifold and its slope as it penetrates the
Cosmic Onion Layers. Electric potential manifests when
there is a charge differential from one location of space to an-
other – like the separation of plates in a capacitor. Magnetic
potential is when there is a charge differential in time from
one place to another. Yes, this means that a magnet’s exist-
ence is spread across time, maybe only picoseconds, but one
end is slightly into the future and the other slightly into the
past. A permanent magnet is a kind of Superconductor, but
not in the sense of electrons flowing in a wire, rather as the
Superstring-photons flowing in the magnetic loop and
through the magnet. (This last statement is a bit speculative and
represents the frontiers of my current thought process.)
5.3 What is Matter?
The term “matter” generally refers to a collection of “parti-
cles”, which are NOT billiard balls, but rather they are 3rd stage
manifestations of these quantum-scale wave interactions:
a) Each “particle” is created by the instantaneous intersection
of the Now-Manifold as it “slides past” the wavefunction
that defines the particle. The wave-function is a hollow
double-axis vortexes that manifest as “Superstrings” – the
shimmering outline of these tiny torus shaped manifesta-
tions. The resistance the particle-wave encounters while en-
countering the Onion-layers’ angular momentum manifests
as the particle’s mass.
2
. .
2
2
. .
22
2
2
.
1
(10)
t a a
a a
r
r
Mass
m
h f
t t s
N c Gravity
kg
ct
K
 
   
     
    
 
   
 
 


 





b) The reaction to this radiates on the Now-Manifold manifest-
ing as fractalized ripples resulting in a dent in the Now-
Manifold proportional to the particle’s mass – this is quan-
tum gravity. In this two-way exchange of frequencies, the
particle “feels” the influence of waves arriving and the parti-
cle’s own resonance radiates frequencies carried on the
Now-Manifold as wavelength = c/f. Each Onion-Layer, be-
ing like holographic film, captures a trace of the particles
path. Section 5.5 where radioactive decay is evidence of this.

Wsol: Our Cosmos = Holographic 4D-Spherical Standing Wave Vol. 10
8
Planck-charge is about 11.7 times stronger than proton’s posi-
tive or electrons negative charge. This results in about 11.72or
137 times more surface area on the toroid that gets generated.
m
m e
qK

  


1.8755

10-18 Coulombs (12)
Each particle has a major and minor axis to its torus shape.
The major axis is associated with the strong Planck charge, the
minor axis is associated with weaker fundamental charge, e.
5.4 Unraveling the Curled Dimensions [8]
This diagram is ONLY a best GUESS (meaning this is not final-
ized) There are only 4 symmetric combinations of major/minor
axis with left/right-handed angular momentum of the charge
aspect of these “particles”. (More explanation in the presentation)
DOWN: - Planck-Charge
+↓ - ↑ +↓-
T i m e
+↑- ↑+↑-
|neutron|ʘ ʘ/electron/
\proton\ ʘ ʘ\positron\
+↑+ ↓+↑+ -↑- ↓-↑-
Maj|Min Maj|Min Maj|Min Maj|Min
>Now-Manifold^
UP: +Planck-Charge
Net charge of the particle is a function of BOTH major and minor
torus-axis spin components. Think of the one axis as being
“charge spin” and the other axis as “mass spin”.
a) An electron’s wavefunction (one Bohr radius hoop pictured
below) [9] While penetrating the Onion-layers each of the 137
little loops get whipped around the major axis of the big hoop
at the Planck-time rate, spreading each loop across the entire
surface. Stack 137 of the big hoops while rotating each hoop
1/137th more than the previous; and you are close to imagining
a real electron’s holographic wavefunction.
b) An electron resonates as X-rays, -AND- its orbital frequency,
acting like a mini-antenna, receives and transmits at orbital
frequency (usually within an octave or so of visible light).
c) The electron charge radius is the ratio of the Planck-mass to
electron mass times the product of Product of the Fine-
structure constant and Planck-length.
e
e
m
r
m



=2.8179403267(27) x10-13 (13)
d) Note how the Fine-structure constant, a, is central to relating
charge dimension, on the left, with mass in the middle and
spatial dimensions on the right. Electron’s toroid Major-axis =
Bohr radius, a0; minor-axis = electron’s charge radius, re.
2
0 0
/
2 2
e C e
o e o
h cm r
e
q a cm a a a

 
      
 
 

(14)
Figure 1: Pictured above is the amazing work from Lund
University, Sweden. It shows how an electron rides on a
light wave just as it gets pulled away from an atom. [10]
Q: How does this model explain the Dual-Slit Experiment?
A: Fundamentally, electrons are waves, so when an electron is
shot towards two slits, as it travels it resonates (active) with
the quantum-foam (reactive), this results in scalar wave reso-
nance with the medium, so the ejected electron, through this
resonance with the Space Medium, this interaction means the
electron-wave interferes with itself. So this wave-front goes
through BOTH slits. Another Mystery Solved!

College Park, MD 2013 PROCEEDINGS of the NPA
9
A proton’s wave-function (pictured above) is 1836.15 times
more tightly wound so it manifests that much more mass (active)
and slows down time (reactive) making a deeper dent in the
Now-Manifold. apis the proton’s fine-structure, pois the pro-
ton’s torus Major-radius,
2/
2 2
p p p
p
o p o o o
h cm r
e
q p cm p p p

 
      
 
 

(15)
e) The QUantum Active-Reactive Knitting (QUARK) occurs as
these wave types interact. The proton-wave interacts with
the Now-Manifold and the outward Onion-waves in an Up-
ward (forward-time) direction, and the proton wave interacts
with the inward Onion-waves in their downward (reverse
time) direction. Thus the proton appears to have an internal
structure of 2 up-quarks and 1 down-quark.
Q: Wouldn’t electrons manifest internal structure like protons?
A: Unlike a proton, which being positively charge creates a
whirlpool bump on the Now-manifold spirally outward, the
electron generates a vortex dent that spirals inward. So these
subtle interactions are internalized.
Electric Fields are the temporal gradient in the Now-Manifold
caused by the charge differential from one point in space to an-
other. Magnetic Fields are the dissipation of angular momentum
of the summation of charges manifesting as magnetic polarities.
5.4 What holds the nucleus together?
Strong Nuclear Force?More properly called the “Strong Inter-
action” because it is not a force like EM or gravity – in that in-
verse-square law does not apply. Matter-waves are NOT point
charges. Below when I say “hollow”, the inside of the springs
contain the Space Medium.
1. They are hollow, so we never have to divide by radius=0.
2. They are hollow, so they can be entangled with each other.
The spring-waves can and DO twist around each other – this is
what holds the nucleus together – simply quantum entanglement
– it is not a force at all. If anything it is the geometry of the angu-
lar momentum of the charge. When an atomic nucleus has per-
fectly balanced proton-neutrons, it has symmetry. The entangled
proton-neutron nucleon-pairs wrap in a bundle and vibrate in a
stable fashion.
5.5 What causes radioactive decay?
Isotopes have additional neutrons wrapped into or around the
nucleus. More often than not, this breaks symmetry. As this
bundle penetrates the resistance of the Onion-layers it causes
part of it to twist building up torsional tension around the time-
axis which, in time, reaches a threshold; suddenly breaking away
– resulting in thermonuclear decay. Releasing energy as angular
momentum causing spiral tracks in cloud and bubble chambers.

Wsol: Our Cosmos = Holographic 4D-Spherical Standing Wave Vol. 10
10
Figure 2: Bubble Chamber Tracks [11]
I envision, that the distinguishing factor that determines alpha
decay verses beta decay is that beta-decay involves a lone-
neutron that twists on the surface of the “layering” of the bun-
dles of proton-neutron pairs. (This “layering” is analogies to the
electron orbital shells – and, in fact, is the core reason for those
shells.) Alpha-decay involves a proton-neutron pair, twisting
around a second pair. This double-pair bundle, in time, twists
up to the point, that the torsional tension just can’t take it any-
more, and snaps the entanglement, suddenly releasing the built-
up energy and a rapidly spinning alpha particle.

College Park, MD 2013 PROCEEDINGS of the NPA
11
6. Recap & Conclusion
6.1 Unraveling the twists reveal α harmonic simplicity
Q: Why does “α” show up so frequently in these equations?
What is the significance of the fine-structure constant?
A: Currently I’m exploring the possibility that higher dimensions
of reality are αproportionality of cosmic resonance. The fine-
structure constant may be the scaling-factor that determines
the resonance of the higher dimensional fractalization -OR-
each dimensional level may have its own factor. What that
means is this: When you watch a video that zooms into a
Mandelbrot set, (follow link [12]) you will see “patterns” that
repeat at difference size-scales, but they twist as higher har-
monics; for our universe this span between one pattern-set
and the next is the meaning of the “fine-structure”. It is the
resonance between one dimensional level and its neighbor.
6.2 Conclusion and Future Research
All fundamental properties of the “Vacuum” of
Space, physical constants & Planck-units have, herein,
been successfully mapped, one-to-one, to the quantum-
scale geometry of this simple model. Nothing about the
“Vacuum” has been excluded and no “holes” in the
Space~Time aspects of the model. The geometry of
these “truly fundamental” wave constructs is sufficient
to describe the mathematics that defines our cosmos.
The Now-Manifold is similar to the event horizon of
a black hole – the surface is the equilibrium point be-
tween forward time and backward time. In a sense,
time stands still because it is always “Now”. The fact
that we experience the forward flow of time may be
analogous to a black hole’s Hawking Radiation. This
ties in nicely with Nassim Haramein’s assertion that the
“Schwarzschild Proton”
[13]
is a kind of mini-black hole,
its surface being the event horizon.
Within this framework there is much more work to
be done to define each particle type and then to go on to
model atomic nuclei and show how layering of twisted
proton-neutron pairs create a layering of electron shells,
and the twisting together create the s, p, d, & f orbitals.
Much more needs to be said about the implications of
Space~Time expansion, but this will need much more re-
search into radioactive decay and its use in dating rocks
and stars. This will be the subject of next year’s research.
1M. Kavic, J.H. Simonetti, S.E. Cutchin, S.W. Ellingson, and C.D. Patterson, "Transient Pulses from Exploding Primordial Black Holes as a Signa-
ture of an Extra Dimension", J. Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, No. 11, 2008, 017 (10pp). http://stacks.iop.org/1475-7516/2008/i=11/a=017.
2Science News, “Searching for a Tiny New Dimension, Curled up like the Universe before the Big Bang”, Mar 12, 2008
3http://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=265455, “Is Time a Dimension?”
4Haramein, Nassim: “Quantum Gravity and the Holographic Mass”, Science Domain Int’l, Physical Review & Research Int’l,
ISSN: 2231-1815, p 270-292
5Anderson, John D, Philip A. Laing, Eunice L. Lau, Anthony S. Lie, Michael Martin Nieto, Slava G. Turyshev,
“Study of the Anomalous Acceleration of Pioneer 10 and 11”, 19-Apr-2001, revised (10-Mar-2005),
http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0104064
6http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fritz_Zwicky#Dark_matter
7http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spin_(physics) see reference 6.Tomonaga, Sin-Itiro; Oka, Takeshi (trans.) (1997). Chapter 7: “The Quantity Which is
Neither Vector Nor Tensor". The Story of Spin. University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-80794-0.
8Wsol, John: “Unraveling the Curled Dimensions”, http://MysteriesOfTheUniverse.info/Unraveling_theCurledDimensions.htm
9http://shoestringscience.com/wiki/index.php?title=File:Orthogonal_3-phase_13-8_torus_knots_1920x1080.png : Electron & Proton images are
derivative works based on Don Mitchell’s POV-ray source-code.
10 http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/02/080222095358.htm: Electron Gets Film Debut in First-Ever Video of its Kind
11 http://TheBubbleChamber.org/2010/10/ image credit
12 Jager, Alex: “The Infinity of Iterative Elegance – Mathematics of the Mandelbrot Set”, excellent YouTube video (Zoom starts at about 4:30)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Fync5HL4Lg
13 Haramein, Nassim: “The Schwarzschild Proton”, AIP Conference Proceedings, CP 1303, ISBN 978-0-7354-0858-6, pp. 95-100.
http://hiup.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/AIP_CP_SProton_Haramein.pdf