ArticlePDF Available

Evaluation of Organic and Inorganic Dust Concentration in Different Mechanized Agricultural Operations for Wheat Crop

Authors:
Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2020) 9(7): 2806-2813
2806
Original Research Article https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2020.907.331
Evaluation of Organic and Inorganic Dust Concentration in Different
Mechanized Agricultural Operations for Wheat Crop
S. H. Shivpuje1*, A. K. Mehta1, D. V. Patil2 and P. A. Dharaiya1
1Department of FMPE, College of Technology and Engineering,
MPUA&T, Udaipur (Raj.), India
2Department of FMPE, College of Agricultural Engineering and Technology,
VNMKV, Parbhani (MH), India
*Corresponding author
A B S T R A C T
Introduction
Dust is generated as a result of agricultural
machine operations in the field mostly by
machine-soil and machine-plant interactions.
Agriculture workers breathe the generated
dusts during the operation. Dust also interacts
with human body as the skin is exposed to
dust particles. Dusts generated in agricultural
activities could be classified as inorganic
dusts (soil/mineral dusts), organic dusts (plant
debris), and biological dusts (animal debris).
Inorganic dusts originate predominantly from
the soil, and tend to result in non-allergic
reactions in the lung. Organic dusts originate
from plant and animal sources and are
commonly the source of allergic diseases such
as asthma. Organic dust may contain not only
the grain and hay contents but pollen, fungal
spores, fungal hyphae, mycotoxins, bacteria
International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences
ISSN: 2319-7706 Volume 9 Number 7 (2020)
Journal homepage: http://www.ijcmas.com
Agricultural dusts are generated due to crop production activities such as ploughing, seed
bed preparation, sowing, harvesting and threshing. The present study was undertaken for
evaluation of organic and inorganic dust concentration in different agricultural operations
in Wheat crop cultivation. The dust concentration at two locations (near to operator seat on
tractor and at by-stander position) for ploughing, seed bed preparation, sowing and
harvesting operations. Whereas, the dust concentration for threshing operation were taken
at three locations viz. feeding chute, bhusa outlet and grain outlet positions. A real - time
personal dust monitor was used to measure the dust levels after every 15 min of operation.
In this measurement 2.5 µm, 10 µm and TSP size sampling head were used. The measured
dust concentration levels were compared with standard exposure limits defined by OSHA.
The range of environmental parameters such as Temperature (0C), Relative humidity (%)
and Wind speed (m/sec) were also measured by using WBGT monitor. Moisture content of
soil (%) and tractor forward speed (km/h) were also measured for field operations. It was
found that, all the operations, the dust concentrations were well below the standard
exposure limits in wheat production.
Ke ywo rds
Dust Concentration,
Wheat, Dust
Monitor, OSHA,
environmental
parameters
Accepted:
22 June 2020
Available Online:
10 July 2020
Article Info
Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2020) 9(7): 2806-2813
2807
and endotoxins (Snbosh, 1994). These dust
particles range in size from < 0.01 to 100 µm,
with up to 40 percent in the respirable range.
Dust sizes in the air could vary in the range of
1 - 30 μm (Alsan, 1998). Dusts larger than 10
μm are considered to be coarse dusts, which
are blocked in the upper air passages in the
body. Dust particles smaller than 10 μm are
fine dusts and can penetrate into lower air
passages in the human body. Dust particle
size below 5 µm may reach alveolar region of
the lungs. Some portions of the fine dust are
cell penetrating and can reach terminal
bronchioles as shown in Fig. 1.
For all farmers the relative heart rate increase
during working, resulting in increased
respiration which enhances inhaling of dusts
at the workplace (Christensen et al., 1992).
According to Reilly (1981), operators
working in agriculture faced allergies four
times more as compared to a control group.
Respiratory problems turned out to be the
second most common diseases that the
farmers suffer and tractor and combine
operators experienced bronchioles two times
more than other agricultural workers.
Respiratory problems were observed in 25
percent of the agricultural operators. The
present study was taken to determine the dust
concentration levels in different agricultural
operations.
Materials and Methods
The study was conducted at Instructional farm
of College of Technology and Engineering,
Udaipur where wheat crop was grown in
sandy loam soil of Rabi season. Dust
concentrations were measured during all
operations such as ploughing, seed-bed
preparation, sowing, harvesting and threshing
in the entire crop growing period (November
13 to April 14). Total five locations were
selected, two locations that were near to
operator seat on tractor and at by-stander
position in ploughing, seed bed preparation,
sowing and harvesting operations and other
three locations near grain outlet, near feeding
chute and bhusa outlet in threshing operation.
The wind velocity (m/sec), temperature (°C),
and relative humidity (percent), moisture
content of soil (percent) and tractor forward
speed (km/h) during each operation were also
recorded. The environmental heat stress index
was measured with Quest 36 heat stress
monitor. Three different sized sampling heads
2.5 µm, 10 µm and TSP were used to measure
the dust concentration with HAZ Dust
sampler (EPAM 5000). A total of thirty six
measurements were taken for three dust size
sampling heads with three replications each
for each of the operations. This study was
conducted to characterize potential exposure
to dust during ploughing, seed bed
preparation, sowing, harvesting and threshing
operations of wheat production. The dust
measurements near to operator seat in
harvesting and near grain outlet in threshing
operation are shown in Fig. 2 and Fig. 3
respectively.
Standard exposure limits of dust
concentration
The measured dust levels were compared with
standard exposure limits given by
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA, 2010) and American
Conference of Governmental Industrial
Hygienists (ACGIH) (Kirkhorn, 2000). The
standard exposure limits are given in
(Table.1)
Results and Discussion
Environmental parameters
The dry bulb temperature in ploughing, seed
bed preparation, sowing and harvesting
operations varied from 25-29°C, 30-32°C, 30-
32°C and 36-40°C, respectively. The relative
Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2020) 9(7): 2806-2813
2808
humidity in ploughing, seed bed preparation,
sowing and harvesting operations was
recorded from 30-34 percent, 25-28 percent,
25-28 percent and 20-22 percent, respectively.
The wind speed in ploughing, seed bed
preparation, sowing and harvesting operations
was observed from 0.3-0.5 m/s, 0.3-0.7 m/s,
0.4-0.8 m/s and 0.4-1.2 m/s, respectively. The
moisture content of soil in ploughing, seed
bed preparation, sowing and harvesting
operations varied from 16-20 percent, 12-16
percent, 12-16 percent and 6-8 percent,
respectively. The tractor forward speed in
ploughing, seed bed preparation, sowing and
harvesting operations was maintained such as
5.0-5.2 km/h, 5.3-5.5 km/h, 5.0-5.2 km/h and
4.0-5.0 km/h, respectively.
Table.1 Standard exposure limits
Dust Type
ACGIH (mg/m3)
Total dust
10
Respirable dust
3
Table.2 Concentrations near operator’s seat and at by- stander position for PM2.5
Location
Operation
Dust concentration measured (mg/m3)
Operator seat
Ploughing
0.512
Seed bed preparation
0.621
Sowing
0.773
Harvesting
1.134
By-stander
position
Ploughing
0.232
Seed bed preparation
0.237
Sowing
0.261
Harvesting
0.325
CV (%)
4.70
CD at 5 %
0.0406
Table.3 Dust concentrations at operator seat and at by stander position for PM10
Location
Operation
Dust concentration measured (mg/m3)
Operator seat
Ploughing
0.524
Seed bed preparation
0.626
Sowing
0.942
Harvesting
1.845
By stander position
Ploughing
0.424
Seed bed
preparation
0.485
Sowing
0.623
Harvesting
0.855
CV (%)
9.03
CD at 5 %
0.1203
Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2020) 9(7): 2806-2813
2809
Table.4 Total dust concentrations at operator seat and at by stander
position in different operations
Location
Operation
Dust concentration measured (mg/m3)
Operator seat
Ploughing
0.753
Seed bed preparation
1.163
Sowing
3.137
Harvesting
3.577
By stander
position
Ploughing
0.441
Seed bed preparation
0.468
Sowing
0.939
Harvesting
1.643
CV (%)
4.79
CD at 5 %
0.1224
Table.5 Dust measurements of PM2.5 in threshing operation
Operation
Locations
Dust concentration measured (mg/m3)
Threshing
Grain outlet
0.076
Feeding chute
0.356
Bhusa outlet
0.910
CV (%)
5.57
CD at 5 %
0.0453
Table.6 Dust measurements of PM10 in threshing operation
Operation
Location
Dust concentration measured (mg/m3)
Threshing
Grain outlet
0.123
Feeding chute
0.537
Bhusa outlet
0.854
CV (%)
12.40
CD at 5 %
0.1138
Table.7 Total dust concentration at three locations in threshing operation
Operation
Location
Dust concentration (mg/m3)
Threshing
Grain outlet
0.165
Feeding chute
0.854
Bhusa outlet
1.643
CV (%)
5.11
CD at 5 %
0.0824
Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2020) 9(7): 2806-2813
2810
Fig.1 Dust particle sizes and dust penetration in the respiratory system (Reilly, 1981)
Fig.2 Dust concentration measurement in harvesting
Fig.3 Dust concentration measurement in threshing
10 µm
5 µm
4 µm
20 µm
Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2020) 9(7): 2806-2813
2811
Assessment of dust concentration during
different agriculture operation
Dust concentration were measured in field
operations with 2.5 µm (PM2.5), 10 µm
(PM10) and TSP sampling head at both near
operator’s seat and at by-stander position in
ploughing, seed bed preparation, sowing and
harvesting operations.
Concentration of 2.5 µm particle size dust
in different operations
Dust concentrations were measured with 2.5
µm size sampling head at operator seat and at
by-stander position in different agricultural
operations (Table.2).
The highest dust concentration was recorded
as 1.134 mg/m3 at operator seat in harvesting
operation. High dust concentration in
harvesting operation may be because of
organic dust generated due to high speed
cutting of crop. Ploughing operation was
recorded minimum dust concentration
because of moisture presence in soil due to
presowing irrigation. Both locations show the
same pattern of dust concentration.
Concentration of 10 µm particle size dust
in different operations
Dust concentrations were measured with 10
µm dust size sampling head at operator seat
and at by stander position in different
agricultural operations (Table.3). The highest
dust concentration was rescored as 1.845
mg/m3 at operator seat in harvesting
operation.
As compared to ploughing, seed bed
preparation and sowing operation dust
concentration in harvesting operation of PM10
size at operator seat was found more due to
the presence of organic dust in harvesting
operation as compared to other three
operations.
Concentration of Total dust in different
operations
Dust concentrations were measured with TSP
dust size sampling head at operator seat and at
by-stander position in different agricultural
operations (Table.4). The highest dust
concentration was rescored as 3.577 mg/m3 at
operator seat in harvesting operation. It was
found that, the organic dust concentration was
increased due to high speed crop cutting.
Dust concentrations at three locations in
threshing operations
Dust concentrations in Wheat threshing
operation were measured at three locations
near grain outlet, near feeding chute and near
bhusa outlet for three dust samples viz. PM2.5,
PM10 and TSP.
Concentration of 2.5 µm particle size dust
in threshing operation
In threshing operation, there was significant
effect on dust concentration in three different
locations (Table.5). For 2.5 µm dust
particulates, the mean dust concentration near
grain outlet, near feeding chute and near
bhusa outlet were recorded as 0.076 mg/m3,
0.356 mg/m3 and 0.910 mg/m3, respectively
in threshing operation. In comparison to grain
outlet and feeding chute, the bhusa outlet had
highest dust concentration measured as 0.910
mg/m3 with 2.5 µm size sampling head in
threshing operation.
Concentration of 10 µm particle size dust
in threshing operation
For 10 µm dust particulates, in threshing
operation the mean dust concentration near
grain outlet, near feeding chute and near
bhusa outlet were recorded as 0.123 mg/m3,
0.537 mg/m3 and 0.854 mg/m3, respectively
(Table.6). In comparison to grain outlet and
Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2020) 9(7): 2806-2813
2812
feeding chute, the highest dust concentration
was measured as 0.854 mg/m3 near bhusa
outlet for PM10 in threshing operation.
Total dust concentration in threshing
operation
For TSP dust particulates, the mean dust
concentration near grain outlet, near feeding
chute and near bhusa outlet were recorded as
0.165 mg/m3, 0.854 mg/m3 and 1.643 mg/m3,
respectively (Table.7).
The organic dust was generated from
ploughing, seed bed preparation, sowing and
harvesting operations and the inorganic dust
was from threshing operation. The organic
dust concentration from the harvesting
operation was found very high in both cases
of near to operator and by-stander positions
among all the operations for three dust
samplers. The highest inorganic dust
concentration was recorded at bhusa outlet in
threshing operation among three locations and
for the all dust sizes. It was revealed that dust
concentration whether organic or inorganic
was found below the standard exposure limit
of 3 mg/m3 for respirable dust as per the
ACGIH.
References
Nieuwenhuijsen M. J. et.al. (1998).
Determinants of personal dust exposure
during field crop operations in
California agriculture, American
Industrial Hygiene Association Journal,
5(1): 9 13.
Nieuwenhuijsen M. J., et.al (1998). Exposure
to dust and its particle size distribution
in California agriculture. American
Industrial Hygiene Association Journal,
59(1): 34-38.
Aybek A.. et.al. (2007). Dust exposures in
tractor and combine operations in
Eastern Mediterranean, Turkey. Journal
of Environmental Biology, 28(4): 839-
844.
Chhuneja N. K. (2009). Assessment of
available dust protectors for protection
to combine harvester operators.
Development in Agricultural and
Industrial Ergonomics, (1): 93-98.
Arslan S., et.al (2010). Measurement of
Personal PM10, PM2.5 and PM1
exposures in tractor and combine
operations and evaluation of health
disturbances of operators. Journal of
Agricultural Sciences, 16: 104-115.
Pandirwar A. P., et.al (2010). Assessment of
dust level in manual harvesting and
threshing of wheat. M.Tech Thesis.
Division of Agricultural Engineering,
Indian Agricultural Research Institute,
New Delhi.
Ghatge J.S. (2012). Study the dust
concentration in the environment of
flour mill and pulse mill and its
comparison with the standard exposure
limits. Unpublished M. Tech thesis.
Department of farm machinery and
power engineering, MPUAT Udaipur.
Selçuk A et.al (2012). Particulate matter
exposure in agriculture. Licensee
INTECH. This is an open access
chapter. Website
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by
/3.0). Swedish National Board of
Occupational Safety and Health,
SNBOSH (1994). Organic Dust in
Agriculture. General recommendations
of the SNBOSH on organic dust in
Agriculture Adopted 15th June 1994.
Available at http: /www.av.se/document
in English/legislations/eng 9411. pdf.
Aslan, Z. 1998. Sarayc›k-Sar›han
Granitoyidleri (Bayburt) ve Çevre
Kayaçlar›n›n Petrolojisi, Jeokimyas› ve
Sar›han Granitoyidinin Jeokronolojik
‹ncelenmesi [Petrology-Geochemistry
of Sarayc›kSar›han Granitoids and
Their Country Rocks and
Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2020) 9(7): 2806-2813
2813
Geochronology of Sarhan Granitoid.
PhD Thesis, Karadeniz Technical
University, Trabzon [in Turkish with
English abstract.
Christensen et al., 1992. et.al. Maize
polyubiquitin genes: structure, thermal
perturbation of expression and transcript
splicing, and promoter activity
following transfer to protoplasts by
electroporation. Plant Molecular
Biology. 18(4):675-89.
O'reilly, K. (1981), A Technique Of
Diathermy Sclerosis Of Varicose Veins.
Australian and New Zealand Journal of
Surgery, 51: 379382.
How to cite this article:
Shivpuje, S. H., A. K. Mehta, D. V. Patil and Dharaiya, P. A. 2020. Evaluation of Organic and
Inorganic Dust Concentration in Different Mechanized Agricultural Operations for Wheat
Crop. Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci. 9(07): 2806-2813.
doi: https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2020.907.331
... The inhalation of dust can damage workers' lungs, which may be termed occupational lung disease [26,27]. Respirable dust particles with an aerodynamic diameter below 5 µm may reach the tracheobronchial and alveolar regions of the lungs [8]. In India, the incidence of occupational lung disease ranges from 15% to 30% [28]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Agricultural operations and the processing sector generate dust laden with endotoxin in the workplace. Endotoxin, a pro-inflammatory agent, has adverse effects on health, especially in the lungs, as exposure to endotoxin reduces lung function capacity. Endotoxin exposure to workers and its harmful impact on the health of agricultural workers needs to be studied in detail for future interventions to reduce exposure to endotoxin. The review can help to identify the analytical methods used to determine endotoxin exposure in agriculture. A detailed study of the research articles published in the last two decades related to agriculture and allied fields was carried out. In the agricultural sector, Pantoea agglomerans, a Gram-negative bacterium, was predominantly present. The filters were stored at a temperature of −20 °C, and E. coli 055: B5 was the predominately used standard to analyze the endotoxin. The quantitative kinetic Limulus Amebocyte Lysate test was the most common detection method for quantifying endotoxin. Control strategies to reduce endotoxin exposure are also emphasized in this review.
... The agriculture sector also generates a huge amount of dust because of several agriculture processes [ [28]]. Most of the Asian countries are promoting fuel wood as an energy source for multiple applications. ...
Article
Full-text available
Precise and accurate determination of particle size distribution (PSD) and compositional analysis is of prime importance for road dust management as most of the dust after collection is dumped on the adjacent side of the road or landfill sites. In this manuscript, we have compiled the scattered information about the dust classification, sources, PSD, polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), traces metals, etc. and also determined the PSD of collected road dust of representative samples from selected commercial, institutional, traffic intersection and residential sites in Delhi NCR. The moisture has been conducted by using IS 2720 (Part-2) standard test method. It was observed that moisture varied from 3.38 ± 0.14% to 8.05 ± 0.33%, respectively. The uncertainty evaluation to determine PSD has been carried out. The effects of balance, recovery, sieves diameter, have also been determined as per EURACHEM/GUM guidelines. The classification of road dust as per Indian Standard Specification (IS: 1498) suggested that the major percentage of road dust falls in the sand category and has possibilities to use widely for construction purposes, preparation of blocks, kerb, development of footpaths, etc. The modifications of road design, development of green belts and growing of dust capturing plants are the other alternatives to control emission of road dust. However, there is a dire need to develop reference material for accurate measurement of road dust to control road dust emissions in a scientific perspective.
... The agriculture sector also generates a huge amount of dust because of several agriculture processes [ [28]]. Most of the Asian countries are promoting fuel wood as an energy source for multiple applications. ...
Article
Full-text available
Precise and accurate determination of particle size distribution (PSD) and compositional analysis is of prime importance for road dust management as most of the dust after collection is dumped on the adjacent side of the road or landfill sites. In this manuscript, we have compiled the scattered information about the dust classification, sources, PSD, polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), traces metals, etc. and also determined the PSD of collected road dust of representative samples from selected commercial, institutional, traffic intersection and residential sites in Delhi NCR. The moisture has been conducted by using IS 2720 (Part-2) standard test method. It was observed that moisture varied from 3.38 ± 0.14% to 8.05 ± 0.33%, respectively. The uncertainty evaluation to determine PSD has been carried out. The effects of balance, recovery, sieves diameter, have also been determined as per EURACHEM/GUM guidelines. The classification of road dust as per Indian Standard Specification (IS: 1498) suggested that the major percentage of road dust falls in the sand category and has possibilities to use widely for construction purposes, preparation of blocks, kerb, development of footpaths, etc. The modifications of road design, development of green belts and growing of dust capturing plants are the other alternatives to control emission of road dust. However, there is a dire need to develop reference material for accurate measurement of road dust to control road dust emissions in a scientific perspective.
Article
Full-text available
Six different types of available personal dust protector were evaluated for combine harvester operators against dust hazard. Out of these three were of mask type and remaining three of disposable type. These were assessed for their performance as per BIS standards IS 9473–1980. All the selected dust protectors failed in respect of filtration efficiency tests. The filtration efficiency of the dust protectors varied between 65.5%(single tissue paper) and 92.2%(cloth). The dust protectors were subjected to suitability tests of 1 hour each on 20 combine harvester operators during wheat as well as paddy harvesting season. The suitability performance was recorded in terms of breathing resistance, dust filtration performance, leakage of air from sides, feeling of tightness on face, rate of sweating, and wear & tear of dust protectors while in use. The dust protector of disposable cloth material was noted to have the highest acceptability during wheat as well as paddy harvesting season. Thus, cloth type dust protector provided the highest dust protection. Besides, it was a cost effective, easily available and adaptable solution to the operators.
Article
Full-text available
The objective of this study was to determine personal PM10, PM2.5, and PM1 exposure levels of tractor and combine harvester operators in rotary tilling, disc-harrowing, soil packing, planting, fertilizing, harvesting, hay making, and bale making, and to determine health status of the operators. The gravimetric method was used to determine particulate matters (PM) concentrations. PM10 concentrations were higher than the threshold limit value (15000 μg m -3) determined by Occupational Safety and Health Organization (OSHA) in rotary tilling (25770 μg m -3), wheat harvesting (29300 μg m -3), and hay making (24640 μg m -3). Similarly, PM2.5 concentrations were also greater than the threshold limit (5000 μg m -3) in these operations (respectively with 5888, 10560, 8470 μg m -3). PM1 concentration was considerably high, especially in wheat harvest and hay making (respectively with 3130 and 6026 μg m -3), and was even greater than the PM2.5 threshold limit during hay making. It is probable for such high PM concentrations of fine particles to increase the respiratory system nuisances. PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations were measured to be lower than the thresholds in all other field applications. A respiratory questionnaire survey was administered to 40 operators for determination of upper and lowers respiratory disturbances and smoking habits. Sixty three percent of operators were smokers, and complained about coughing with 60% and phlegm with 83%. Health complaint about chest tightness is 31% and breathlessness is about 29%. Nevertheless, when smokers and non-smokers are evaluated separately, coughing rate decreases to 47% and chest tightness reduces to 13%. Although personal exposure to particulate matters is important in its effect on respiratory system disturbances, smoking habit aggravates the complaints. Operators need to use personal preventions to avoid such adverse health effects when operating tractors and combine harvesters without cabins. Operators are unlikely to work in the comfort zone due to high ambient temperature and low relative humidity in vehicles without cabins.
Article
Full-text available
The aim of this study was to measure personal dust exposure levels and the dust particle size distribution during various agricultural operations in California. Personal dust exposure levels were measured with four-stage cascade impactors and respirable dust cyclones during field crop, fruit and nut farming, and dairy operations at three farms. Altogether, 103 cascade impactor measurements and 108 cyclone measurements were taken. High personal dust exposure levels were measured during various operations in particular during ground preparation operations such as land planing (geometric mean [GM] = 57.3 mg/m3, geometric standard deviation [GSD] = 2.4) and discing (GM = 98.6 mg/m3, GSD = 2.9). Dust particles were relatively large and the great majority belonged to the extrathoracic fraction. Dust levels were considerably lower when an enclosed cabin was present on the tractor; for example, during discing, dust exposure levels were reduced more than sixtyfold for the larger dust particle fraction and more than fourfold for the respirable dust fraction.
Article
Full-text available
The aim of this study was to identify determinants, if any, of personal dust exposure levels during agricultural field crop operations in California. Personal dust concentrations were measured with four-stage cascade impactors and respirable dust cyclones. Altogether, 57 cascade impactor measurements and 63 cyclone measurements were used for analyses. High personal dust concentrations were measured during most operations, in particular during ground preparation operations such as land planing and discing. For the larger dust particles, which is dust collected on all stages of the cascade impactor and dust with a 50% cutoff < 9.8 microns, the most important determinants of personal dust exposure were the presence of an enclosed cabin, relative humidity, type of operation, and tractor speed. The presence of an enclosed cabin on the tractor, higher relative humidity, and lower tractor speed were all associated with a decrease in personal dust levels. For smaller dust particles, which is dust with a 50% cutoff < 3.5-4 microns, the presence of an enclosed cabin, relative humidity, and soil temperature appear to be related to dust levels. The results of this study could be used to reduce the high levels of personal dust exposure currently experienced by those who work in field crop farming in California.
Article
Full-text available
The objective of this study was to determine the dust concentrations in selected tractor and combine operations in eastern Mediterranean region in Turkey Mean dust concentrations were 137.9 mg m(-3), 83.6 mg m(-3), 80.3 mg m(-3), and 88.8 mg m(-3) respectively for soil packing, furrowing, straw making, and baling on tractors with no cabins whereas 106.9 mg m(-3) was found in combines without cabins, which are much higher than the limit dust concentration (10 mg m(-3)) considered hazardous for workers' health. In tractor operations with field-installed cabins, mean dust concentrations were 5.6 mg m(-3), 6.6 mg m(-3), 6.4 mg m(-3), and 3.7 mg m(-3), respectively in soil packing, furrowing, straw making, and baling while 4.7 mg m(-3) was measured in combines with field-installed cabins. Considering unit-manufactured cabins, mean dust concentrations were 1.1 mg m(-3), 1.6 mg m(-3), 3.2 mg m(-3), and 1.4 mg m(-3) respectively in tractor operations, and 1.4 mg mr(-3) in combine operations. Variance analyses showed that not only the respiration environment of the workers but also the field operation had a significant effect on measured dust concentrations (p < 0.01). Pearson correlation coefficient was 0.74 (very strong level) between dust concentration and wind speed in soil packing, 0.46 (medium level) between dust concentration and wind speed in baling, and 0.44 (medium level) between dust concentration and ground speed in combining.
Assessment of dust level in manual harvesting and threshing of wheat
  • A P Pandirwar
Pandirwar A. P., et.al (2010). Assessment of dust level in manual harvesting and threshing of wheat. M.Tech Thesis. Division of Agricultural Engineering, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi.
Study the dust concentration in the environment of flour mill and pulse mill and its comparison with the standard exposure limits. Unpublished M. Tech thesis. Department of farm machinery and power engineering
  • J S Ghatge
Ghatge J.S. (2012). Study the dust concentration in the environment of flour mill and pulse mill and its comparison with the standard exposure limits. Unpublished M. Tech thesis. Department of farm machinery and power engineering, MPUAT Udaipur.
Available at http: /www.av.se/document in English/legislations/eng 9411. pdf. Aslan, Z. 1998. Sarayc›k-Sar›han Granitoyidleri (Bayburt) ve Çevre Kayaçlar›n›n Petrolojisi, Jeokimyas› ve Sar›han Granitoyidinin Jeokronolojik ‹ncelenmesi
  • A Selçuk
Selçuk A et.al (2012). Particulate matter exposure in agriculture. Licensee INTECH. This is an open access chapter. Website (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by /3.0). Swedish National Board of Occupational Safety and Health, SNBOSH (1994). Organic Dust in Agriculture. General recommendations of the SNBOSH on organic dust in Agriculture Adopted 15th June 1994. Available at http: /www.av.se/document in English/legislations/eng 9411. pdf. Aslan, Z. 1998. Sarayc›k-Sar›han Granitoyidleri (Bayburt) ve Çevre Kayaçlar›n›n Petrolojisi, Jeokimyas› ve Sar›han Granitoyidinin Jeokronolojik ‹ncelenmesi [Petrology-Geochemistry of Sarayc›kSar›han Granitoids and Their Country Rocks and