- A preview of this full-text is provided by Springer Nature.
- Learn more
Preview content only
Content available from The Science of Nature
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
ORIGINAL PAPER
Arthropod biomass increase in spring correlates with NDVI
in grassland habitat
Mario Fernández-Tizón
1,2
&Tamara Emmenegger
1
&Jörg Perner
3
&Steffen Hahn
1
Received: 30 April 2020 /Revised: 7 September 2020 /Accepted: 14 September 2020
#Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020
Abstract
Data from remote sensing are often used as proxies to quantify biological processes, especially at large geographical scales. The
normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) is the most frequently used proxy for primary productivity. Assuming a direct,
positive interrelation between primary and secondaryproductioninterrestrial habitats, NDVI is often used to predict food availability
for higher trophic levels. However, the relationship between NDVI and arthropod biomass has rarely been tested. In this study, we
analyzed extensive datasets of arthropod communities from semi-natural grasslands in central Europe to test the relationship between
arthropod biomass of consumer trophic levels (“herbivores,”“mixed,”and “carnivores”) in grassland communities and NDVI during
the spring season. We found that arthropod biomass generally increased with NDVI. The same positive relationship between biomass
and NDVI was observed for each individual trophic level. Cross-correlation analyses did not show statistically significant lags
between the NDVI and biomass of herbivores and carnivores. All in all, our study provides correlational evidence for the positive
relation of primary and secondary productivity in temperate terrestrial habitats during spring. Moreover, it supports the applicability of
NDVI data as a suitable habitat-specific proxy for the food availability of insectivores during spring.
Keywords Primary productivity .Secondary productivity .Proxy .Food abundance .Insects .Remote sensing
Introduction
The availability of nutritional resources can critically influ-
ence community composition and species richness
(Mittelbach et al. 2001; Ribas et al. 2003). Animals in season-
al habitats must deal with temporal variation in resource avail-
abilities caused by periodic changes in vegetation structure
(Stinson and Brown 1983) and habitat quality (Wiegand
et al. 2008). However, estimating resource availability is often
difficult to achieve, especially when large and/or remote areas
should be sampled. Thus, ecologists frequently use proxies
derived from remotely sensed data (Pettorelli et al. 2011;
Stephens et al. 2015). Their application requires knowledge
about the underlying relationship between the measured and
the predicted traits. Such interrelation is relatively easy to
establish if these traits are directly linked, as occurs between
marine primary productivity and phytoplankton abundance
(Marshall and Nesius 1996) or primary productivity and plant
biomass in terrestrial ecosystems (Scurlock et al. 2002).
However, approximations encompassing multiple trophic
levels are harder to evaluate.
In ecology, a frequently used indicator for resource approx-
imations is the normalized difference vegetation index
(NDVI), a measure of primary productivity used for many
years in remote sensing. NDVI distinguishes the reflectance
properties of the vegetation (NIR-Red)/(NIR + Red), with
NIR representing the near-infrared and red the visible red light
reflected by the surface (Myneni et al. 1995). Nowadays,
NDVI data are globally available (e.g., www.star.nesdis.
noaa.gov). The temporal and spatial resolutions of these data
have improved over time and are, therefore, ideal for the
analysis of vegetation dynamics at large scales.
Communicated by: Matthias Waltert
Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article
(https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-020-01698-7) contains supplementary
material, which is available to authorized users.
*Mario Fernández-Tizón
mario.fdez.tizon@gmail.com
1
Department of Bird Migration, Swiss Ornithological Institute, CH
6204 Sempach, Switzerland
2
Department of Biology, Geology, Physics and Inorganic Chemistry,
University Rey Juan Carlos, Móstoles, Spain
3
U.A.S. Umwelt- und Agrarstudien GmbH, 07743 Jena, Germany
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-020-01698-7
/ Published online: 24 September 2020
The Science of Nature (2020) 107: 42
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.