A preview of this full-text is provided by Springer Nature.
Content available from Current Psychology
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
Psychometric evaluation of the Malay version Self-Rated Creativity
Scale among secondary school students in Malaysia
Chee-Seng Tan
1
&Anna Wen-Huey Ong
1,2
&Soon-Aun Tan
1
&Siew-May Cheng
3
Published online: 8 September 2020
#Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020
Abstract
Zhou and George’s(2001) 13-item supervisory rating scale has been modified and used for individuals’self-report creativity. This
present research has particularly translated and investigated the psychometric properties of the Malay version Self-Rated Creativity
Scale (SRCS-M) through two studies using two different adolescent samples (N= 753). A one-factor model was identified after the
removal of three items following low factor loading and item-total correlation in exploratory factor analysis in Study 1. Study 2 then
examined and compared the 10-item and 13-item one-factor model besides the 12-item bifactor model. Confirmatory factor analysis
results indicated that the 10-item one-factor model was superior compared with other competing models. Moreover, the test of
measurement variance supported partial scalar invariance between two gender groups in the 10-item one-factor model. The 10-item
SRCS-M also showed good reliability and validity. In a nutshell, the sound psychometric properties of the SRCS-M suggest its
practical use on Malaysian adolescents.
Keywords Adolescents .Confirmatory factor analysis .Exploratory factor analysis .Malay version Self-Rated Creativity Scale .
Measurement invariance
The focus of research on creativity varies from one discipline to
another. As such, the 4P model introduced by Rhodes (1961)
conceptualizes creativity through four different dimensions,
namely product (“what”), process (“how”), person (“who”),
and press (“where”). Most creativity research aims to understand
the mechanism of the creation process, generate creative prod-
ucts, and explore environmental factors and individual character-
istics (e.g., personality) that encourage (or impede) the
development of creativity. Researchers (e.g., Corazza 2016;
Runco and Jaeger 2012) have generally agreed that novelty
and usefulness are the two main ingredients of creativity. Put
differently, a product (e.g., idea, tangible output) would only be
recognized as creative if it is different and sufficient for problem-
solving.
Essentially, individual creativity is shown through one’sabil-
ity in producing novel and useful products apart from demon-
strating individual behaviors and strengths ranging from pur-
chase intensions (Tan 2016), subjective well-being (Tan et al.
2017a), mental health (Stuckey and Nobel 2010) to meaning in
life (Tan et al. 2017b). Following these perspectives, self-rated
creativity in the present study refers to individuals’evaluations of
their ability in generating applicable novelty.
As creativity research has grown significantly in the past
two decades, one challenging issue concerns the measurement
of creativity through a variety of methods and measurements
proposed and used by researchers to examine creativity. For
example, divergent thinking tests have been widely used to
assess creative potentials (Runco and Acar 2012), while some
researchers such as Carson et al. (2005) believed that past
achievements were the objective indicators of creativity.
On the other hand, it must be noted that self-report is one
commonly used assessment method in the creativity research.
For instance, Karwowski and colleagues (Beghetto and
The data used in the present study were collected for and used in a larger
project: Tan, C. S., Tan, S. A., Hashim, I. H. M., Lee, M. N., Ong, A. W.
H., & Yaacob, S. N. B. (2019). Problem-solving ability and stress mediate
the relationship between creativity and happiness. Creativity Research
Journal,31,15–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2019.1568155.
*Chee-Seng Tan
cstan@outlook.my
1
Department of Psychology and Counselling, Faculty of Arts and
Social Science, Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman (UTAR), Jalan
Universiti, Bandar Barat, 31900 Kampar, Perak D.R., Malaysia
2
Present address: Centre for American Education, INTI International
College Subang, Subang Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia
3
Department of Languages and Linguistics, Faculty of Arts and Social
Science, Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman (UTAR),
Kampar, Malaysia
Current Psychology (2022) 41:5264–5271
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-00772-7
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.