ArticlePublisher preview available

Psychometric evaluation of the Malay version Self-Rated Creativity Scale among secondary school students in Malaysia

Authors:
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the authors.

Abstract and Figures

Zhou and George’s (2001) 13-item supervisory rating scale has been modified and used for individuals’ self-report creativity. This present research has particularly translated and investigated the psychometric properties of the Malay version Self-Rated Creativity Scale (SRCS-M) through two studies using two different adolescent samples (N = 753). A one-factor model was identified after the removal of three items following low factor loading and item-total correlation in exploratory factor analysis in Study 1. Study 2 then examined and compared the 10-item and 13-item one-factor model besides the 12-item bifactor model. Confirmatory factor analysis results indicated that the 10-item one-factor model was superior compared with other competing models. Moreover, the test of measurement variance supported partial scalar invariance between two gender groups in the 10-item one-factor model. The 10-item SRCS-M also showed good reliability and validity. In a nutshell, the sound psychometric properties of the SRCS-M suggest its practical use on Malaysian adolescents.
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
Psychometric evaluation of the Malay version Self-Rated Creativity
Scale among secondary school students in Malaysia
Chee-Seng Tan
1
&Anna Wen-Huey Ong
1,2
&Soon-Aun Tan
1
&Siew-May Cheng
3
Published online: 8 September 2020
#Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020
Abstract
Zhou and Georges(2001) 13-item supervisory rating scale has been modified and used for individualsself-report creativity. This
present research has particularly translated and investigated the psychometric properties of the Malay version Self-Rated Creativity
Scale (SRCS-M) through two studies using two different adolescent samples (N= 753). A one-factor model was identified after the
removal of three items following low factor loading and item-total correlation in exploratory factor analysis in Study 1. Study 2 then
examined and compared the 10-item and 13-item one-factor model besides the 12-item bifactor model. Confirmatory factor analysis
results indicated that the 10-item one-factor model was superior compared with other competing models. Moreover, the test of
measurement variance supported partial scalar invariance between two gender groups in the 10-item one-factor model. The 10-item
SRCS-M also showed good reliability and validity. In a nutshell, the sound psychometric properties of the SRCS-M suggest its
practical use on Malaysian adolescents.
Keywords Adolescents .Confirmatory factor analysis .Exploratory factor analysis .Malay version Self-Rated Creativity Scale .
Measurement invariance
The focus of research on creativity varies from one discipline to
another. As such, the 4P model introduced by Rhodes (1961)
conceptualizes creativity through four different dimensions,
namely product (what), process (how), person (who),
and press (where). Most creativity research aims to understand
the mechanism of the creation process, generate creative prod-
ucts, and explore environmental factors and individual character-
istics (e.g., personality) that encourage (or impede) the
development of creativity. Researchers (e.g., Corazza 2016;
Runco and Jaeger 2012) have generally agreed that novelty
and usefulness are the two main ingredients of creativity. Put
differently, a product (e.g., idea, tangible output) would only be
recognized as creative if it is different and sufficient for problem-
solving.
Essentially, individual creativity is shown through onesabil-
ity in producing novel and useful products apart from demon-
strating individual behaviors and strengths ranging from pur-
chase intensions (Tan 2016), subjective well-being (Tan et al.
2017a), mental health (Stuckey and Nobel 2010) to meaning in
life (Tan et al. 2017b). Following these perspectives, self-rated
creativity in the present study refers to individualsevaluations of
their ability in generating applicable novelty.
As creativity research has grown significantly in the past
two decades, one challenging issue concerns the measurement
of creativity through a variety of methods and measurements
proposed and used by researchers to examine creativity. For
example, divergent thinking tests have been widely used to
assess creative potentials (Runco and Acar 2012), while some
researchers such as Carson et al. (2005) believed that past
achievements were the objective indicators of creativity.
On the other hand, it must be noted that self-report is one
commonly used assessment method in the creativity research.
For instance, Karwowski and colleagues (Beghetto and
The data used in the present study were collected for and used in a larger
project: Tan, C. S., Tan, S. A., Hashim, I. H. M., Lee, M. N., Ong, A. W.
H., & Yaacob, S. N. B. (2019). Problem-solving ability and stress mediate
the relationship between creativity and happiness. Creativity Research
Journal,31,1525. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2019.1568155.
*Chee-Seng Tan
cstan@outlook.my
1
Department of Psychology and Counselling, Faculty of Arts and
Social Science, Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman (UTAR), Jalan
Universiti, Bandar Barat, 31900 Kampar, Perak D.R., Malaysia
2
Present address: Centre for American Education, INTI International
College Subang, Subang Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia
3
Department of Languages and Linguistics, Faculty of Arts and Social
Science, Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman (UTAR),
Kampar, Malaysia
Current Psychology (2022) 41:52645271
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-00772-7
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
... Thus, this result confirms that adapting psychometric tools to specific populations, such as university students, is necessary for obtaining more reliable measurements Compared to earlier studies, which focused on creative personality scales designed for secondary school students, the findings highlight a significant novelty (Cropley, 2018(Cropley, , 2020. While previous scales successfully measured creativity among younger students, they did not fully capture the complexities of university-level creativity (Tan, 2022). The current study demonstrates that university students require a more nuanced measurement tool that reflects their advanced cognitive abilities and social experiences. ...
... Unlike quantitative studies that are limited to examining the hypothetical effect of the selected variables (e.g., parenting styles), the qualitative approach allows inputs that are helpful to understand the parental perception of creativity and methods used by parents in Malaysia to promote children creativity, as well as challenges that parents encountered along the process. Moreover, creativity studies in the Malaysian context have shown differences in the perception of creativity (e.g., Tan & Qu, 2012;Tan & Viapude, 2015;Tan et al., 2020). Therefore, it is critical to understand whether parents in Malaysia perceive creativity as similar to or different from the notion of creativity proposed in the literature. ...
... Despite the numerous studies of the influence of intelligence on the creative generation of students, few attempts have been made to explore the impact of self-efficacious belief on creative outcomes (Azim et al., 2019;Tan et al., 2020); S. (Wang et al., 2023). Following the understanding of self-efficacy and identity theory, students with creative self-efficacious beliefs culminate productive creative outcomes (Bandura, 1977;Bandura, 1982;Karwowski, 2015). ...
Article
Full-text available
Intelligence and creativity among school-going students are buzzwords. The exponential growth of studies has spurred on the influence of intelligence on creativity; however, the center of the debate is on the effect of the former on the latter. Surprisingly, very few studies have attempted to investigate the confounding effect which connects intelligence with creativity. Based on the notions of multi-theory, this study explores the impact of intelligence on creativity through the mechanism of a mediator and a moderator. The present study collected 307 cross-sectional data using the convenience sampling method. The collected data were analyzed using partial least square based structural equation modeling with the deduction reasoning method. The results reveal that students’ efficacious belief mediates the influence of intelligence on creativity; however, the moderating effect of creative identity is not demonstrated justified. Practical implications and directions for future research are presented in the final section.
... Finally, it is of utmost importance to test the validity of the translated instruments to ensure their reliability and clarity. For example, after translating it into the Malay language, some items of a self-rated creativity scale, which shows good psychometric properties among young adults in the Malay language, have been found not applicable to adolescents [35]. Therefore, investigating the psychometric qualities of the translated version of FRS is critical [36] before administering it to Malaysian adolescents and young adults in other future studies. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background The original Family Resilience Scale (FRS) is a reliable tool to assess family resilience. However, the FRS is based on the United States and parental context. Thus, the usefulness of the FRS for the adolescent and young adult population in Asian countries, particularly Malaysia remains unknown. This study translated the FRS into the Malay language and validated it on Malaysian adolescents and young adults to identify its potential as a self-report tool to assess the resilience level of their family. Methods A total of 351 participants (Mage = 19.75, SDage = 3.29) were recruited in the study using purposive sampling. Confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to examine the factorial structure of the Family Resilience Scale-Malay (FRS-Malay) and measurement invariance between adolescents and young adults. Then, the scale’s reliability was investigated using Cronbach’s alpha, McDonald’s omega coefficients, and composite reliability index. Finally, we examined the discriminant validity of the FRS-Malay by correlating its score with individual resilience score and examined the incremental validity of the scale using hierarchical multiple regression analysis to test if family resilience can explain individual well-being levels beyond and above individual resilience. Results The findings of the confirmatory factor analysis suggest that a single-factor model is supported for both age groups. Furthermore, the scale exhibited scalar invariance between adolescents and young adults. The scale also exhibited good reliability, as the value of Cronbach’s alpha, McDonald omega coefficients, and composite reliability index were above 0.80. Additionally, the Pearson correlation analysis showed a positive correlation between the FRS-Malay and individual resilience scores, which supports the discriminant validity of the scale. Similarly, the incremental validity of the scale is also supported. Specifically, family resilience had a positive correlation with well-being, even after controlling for individual resilience in the regression analysis. Conclusions The FRS-Malay has demonstrated good reliability and validity. The scale measures the same construct of family resilience across adolescents and young adults, making it suitable for comparisons. Therefore, this unidimensional tool is appropriate for self-reporting their perceived level of family resilience. It is also useful for studying the development and fluctuation of family resilience in the Malaysian context.
Article
Full-text available
Background In this era of rapid development in science and technology, creativity has become an important requirement in nursing to satisfy the daily needs of their patients. However, nurses’ creativity and related aspects are rarely studied in nursing research. This study was aimed to explore the factors influencing nurses’ creativity and to develop a decision support system using machine learning to predict creativity levels among nurses. Methods A multidisciplinary design comprising machine learning algorithms mixed with a descriptive, cross-sectional, correlational design was implemented to enhance data analysis and decision-making. A convenience sample of 191 registered nurses from eight hospitals– representing the broader nursing community in Jordan- was recruited to complete the online survey. Results revealed that staff nurses reported a high level of creativity (M = 44.95). The machine learning model achieved good prediction performance with high precision. Specifically, Naïve Bayes achieved a recall of 99% for predicting psychological safety, around 98% for both gender and time commitment, 96% for years of experience, 92% for nurse age, and 82% for humble leadership. A decision support system was successfully developed based on these findings. Additionally, a multiple linear regression revealed five main predictors of nurses’ creativity: humble leadership, psychological safety, experience, quality initiatives, and education level, together explaining about 30% of the variance in perceived creativity among staff nurses. Conclusions To augment nurses’ creativity, managers are advised to adopt flexible leadership styles, create a safe work environment, and encourage staff development. The developed decision support system may be valuable for helping nurse managers evaluate creativity among nurses; this allows for more informed decisions about staff allocation, development, and resource optimization. Researchers are encouraged to use machine learning models because they achieve good prediction performance with high precision. Clinical trial number Not applicable.
Article
Full-text available
The 50-item Kaufman Domains of Creativity Scale (K-DOCS; Kaufman Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity and the Arts, 6(4), 298-308, 2012) is a relatively new domain-specific self-report scale designed to assess the five different domains of creativity. However, a shorter form of the scale is preferable to reduce participants’ burden. The present research addresses the development of a shorter 20-item K-DOCS (20-K-DOCS) to be used on Malaysian undergraduates across three studies (N = 1409). On the basis of past findings, the four items with the highest factor loading for each of the five domains were extracted to construct the 20-K-DOCS in Study 1. Exploratory factor analysis on the 20 items showed support to the theoretical five-factor structure. In Study 2, confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to examine and compare the 20-K-DOCS with the parent form of K-DOCS and other competing models. Results indicated that the 20-K-DOCS were superior to all the alternative models. In Study 3, the factorial structure of the 20-K-DOCS was further examined. The five-factor model was supported. Moreover, the 20-K-DOCS showed good internal consistency and acceptable convergence with creative self-efficacy and self-rated creativity. The findings of this study strengthen the evidence that the 20-K-DOCS is a psychometrically equivalent short form of the original K-DOCS. Researchers and educators may consider this brief measurement to assess the five different domains of students’ creativity.
Article
Full-text available
The 13‐item self‐rated creativity scale (SRCS) initially developed for supervisory rating of employees’ creativity was modified by some researchers and used as a self‐report of creativity. However, it is not clear if the modified SRCS is psychometrically sound. The present study addressed this gap in three studies (N = 1,033). The exploratory factor analysis (Study 1) revealed a two‐factor solution after removing Item 9 due to low factor loading. Confirmatory factor analysis was then used in Study 2 to examine and compare the conceptual one‐factor model with 13 items (Model 1), one‐factor model with 12 items (Model 2), two‐factor model with 12 items (Model 3), and the 12‐item bifactor model with one general factor and two specific factors (Model 4). The results indicated that Model 4 is more superior to all the competing models. Study 3 further confirmed that the bifactor model, showed support to the reliability and convergent validity, and found partial metric invariance across Chinese and Malay undergraduates. Taken together, the modified (12‐item) SRCS is a psychometrically sound tool for self‐rated creativity in the Malaysian context.
Presentation
Full-text available
Death anxiety studies have shown that death-related anxiety has negative effects on creativity. Some researchers have also suggested that the relationship between the two constructs could be reciprocal, that is, creativity may buffer the detrimental effect of death anxiety. However, few studies have directly examined the impact of creativity on death anxiety. Moreover, the underlying mechanism of the link is not clear. The present study aimed to address this gap by investigating whether and how self-rated creativity influences death anxiety. On the basis of literature, it is hypothesized that creativity may decrease death anxiety through presence of meaning in life. The sample consisted of 166 undergraduate students in Malaysia. The participants answered an online survey that comprised the self-rated creativity scale, meaning in life questionnaire, and death anxiety scale. Results showed that creativity was positively related to presence of meaning, which was negatively correlated with death anxiety. More importantly, the hypothetical mediation model was supported. Students who reported high creativity were likely to have meaning in life. The presence of meaning, in turn, decreased death anxiety. The findings not only shed light on the reciprocal relationship between creativity and death anxiety but also offer the first piece evidence to the mediating role of meaning in life in the relationship. Future studies are suggested to further explore the positive impact of creativity on students’ well-being.
Article
Full-text available
Shyness has been found to have a negative impact on creativity. However, little attention has been given to the underlying process of the relationship between shyness and creativity. On the basis of literature, we hypothesize that shyness has an indirect impact on creativity through creative process engagement. Two studies were conducted on undergraduate students (Study 1) and working adults (Study 2) to test the hypothetical relationship. Analysis on participants self‐report showed that shyness was negatively associated with self‐reported creativity as well as creative process engagement. There was a positive relationship between creative process engagement and creativity. More importantly, mediation analysis supported that shyness was indirectly linked to creativity via creative process engagement. Specifically, shy people are found to be less involved in creativity‐relevant processes such as information searching and idea generation. The low level of creative process engagement, in turn, hinders their creativity. The findings not only lend support to the detrimental effect of shyness on creativity but also shed light on the underlying mechanism of the relationship.
Article
Full-text available
The present study examines the psychometric properties of the Creative Process Engagement Scale (CPES) among Malaysian undergraduates. A total of 377 undergraduates whose ages ranged from 18 to 43 years participated in the study and were presented with the CPES and self-perceived creativity. Confirmatory factor analyses supported the hierarchical four-factor structure of the CPES, which consisted of three first-order factors and one second-order factor. In addition, we found that the CPES has sound internal consistency as well as criterion- related validity. Furthermore, the results of measurement invariance testing supported the hypothesis of equivalent factor loading and intercepts for this hierarchical four-factor structure across gender. Latent mean analysis revealed that female students showed less engagement in creativity-related activities than male students. The findings shed light on the psychometric qualities of the CPES and confirm that the CPES measures involvement in creative activities across gender in undergraduate students.
Article
Full-text available
Is dishonesty affected by one's creativity and environment? Recent studies have documented the effects of creativity and environment on dishonesty respectively. However, little attention has been given to the interaction effect of creativity and environment. Based on past findings, we hypothesized that creative people, compared to their non-creative counterparts, may tell more lies in an enriched (vs. scarce) environment. An experiment was conducted on a sample of 97 undergraduate students to examine the moderation effect of environment on the linkage of creativity and cheating. Participants completed a creativity task and a questionnaire on general knowledge about Malaysia. Two-way ANOVA analysis showed that creative participants, as well as those in the enriched environment, were more likely to tell lies than their counterparts. More importantly, the interaction effect of creativity and environment was statistically significant. Specifically, the creative people were more likely to cheat in the enriched environment than in the scarce environment. The results not only shed light on the link between creativity and dishonesty but also suggest a new direction for minimizing dishonesty behaviours.
Article
Full-text available
Although past studies have found a positive relationship between product creativity and purchase intention , little is known about the underlying process behind this relationship. The present study addressed this gap by examining the role of openness to experience in the relationship between product creativity and purchase intention. Participants (88 undergraduate students) evaluated creativity of a self-nominated product and reported the extent to which they are willing to buy the product, as well as their openness to experience. Analysis showed that there was a positive relationship between product creativity and openness to experience and these two variables were significantly correlated with purchase intention. Furthermore, mediation analysis supported that product creativity increases purchase intension indirectly through openness to experience. The findings shed light on the mechanism of how product creativity increases purchase intention and serve as an evidence for future studies to investigate how and what aspects of product creativity that enhance individual's sense of openness and purchase intention.
Article
Full-text available
Studies indicate that there is a positive relationship between openness to experience and creativity. However, relatively little attention has been given to the mechanism of this relationship. On the basis of previous findings, we hypothesized a conceptual model and tested the mediating role of intrinsic motivation and the creative process engagement in the relationship between openness to experience and creativity. One hundred and ninety‐eight undergraduates in Malaysia participated in the study and completed an online measure of openness to new experience, creativity, intrinsic motivation, and the creative process engagement. Consistent with the hypothesis, people who scored high on openness reported high intrinsic motivation. The high motivation enhanced engagement in creativity‐related activities, which in turn, improved self‐rated creativity. The findings not only shed light on mechanisms that underlie in the openness‐creativity linkage but they also highlight the importance of intrinsic motivation and creative process engagement in the linkage. Together, the study extends the effect of personality trait on creativity and offers a new direction for future studies.
Article
Many studies have found that creativity tends to promote happiness, but the underlying mechanism remains unclear. This study proposed and tested a serial mediation model to investigate the relationships among creativity, problem solving, stress, and happiness on emerging adults and adolescents (N = 1,146). It is hypothesized that creativity is conducive to happiness indirectly through (a) problem-solving ability, (b) stress, and (c) problem-solving ability and then stress (i.e., serial mediating effect). Undergraduate students and secondary school students self-reported their creativity, social problem-solving ability, stress, happiness, and life satisfaction. The mediating role of problem-solving ability and the serial mediating effect were found statistically significant while controlling the effect of life satisfaction. The mediating role of stress, however, was not supported. The findings not only lend further support to the beneficial effect of self-perceived creativity on happiness, but also extend our understanding on the relationship by revealing the underlying process.