Education is traditionally seen as the process whereby children —as newcomers to the world—are guided by adults into the community of shared meaning, which Hannah Arendt has described as a common world. According to Arendt (2006a), being an educator means accepting a position of authority whose assurance is taking responsibility for the world such as it is. For only responsible adults can assist children into a position of renewing the world when their time comes.
Contemporary social philosophers take a similar approach to educational authority, notably Foros and Vetlesen (2015) and Vetlesen and Willig (2018), but this time the question of what it means to be responsible for the world is much more overwhelming. Where Arendt during the 1950s and 1960s was concerned with the continuation and renewal of humanity and saw the need to protect the public realm where politics and individual freedom reigns, Vetlesen and his co-authors are urging educators to consider the greatest challenges of our time, and quite possibly, of all times: climate change and ecological crises. Accordingly, the task of renewing our common world—the purpose of educational authority for Arendt (2006a)—is now set in a time where human activities are destroying the ecological conditions for life, for ourselves and many other species. The chapter discusses some of the challenges raised by these developments for how we conceptualize the relationship between the philosophy and politics of education. For example, what does it mean when the educand—the child or student—posits the norms for the educator: “this is how I want you to educate me”? Does it spell the end of authority in education, or can the traditional educational relationship be configured in novel ways? And on a related note, how can we understand the relationship between educational norms and the instituted values in today’s post-traditional societies of advanced capitalism?