The Effect of National Standard Education Towards
Student’s Character at Junior High School and Islamic
Junior High School
Ishak Aziz
Faculty of Sport Science, Universitas Negeri Padang, Indonesia
*Corresponding author. Email: 60ishakaziz@gmail.com
ABSTRACT
The purpose of this study is to determine how the National Standard Education consisting of Content
Standard, Process Standard, Education Staffs Standard, and Assessment Standard influences the character of
the students at Junior High School and Islamic Junior High School in Bukittinggi. This is a quantitative
research method involving 138 Junior High School students. The instrument used in this research was a
questionnaire on characteristics. Data were analyzed using simple regression analysis. Based on the data
analysis, it was found that: 1) the Content Standard affects students’ characteristic with tcalculate=3.149 and
ttable=2.44, 2) the Process Standard affects students’ characteristic with tcalculate=0.697 and ttable=2.44, 3) the
Educational Staff Standard affects students’ characteristic with tcalculate=1.771 and ttable=2.44, 4) the
Assessment Standard affects students’ characteristic with tcalculate=2.516 and ttable=2.44, 5) the Content
Standard, Process Standard, Educational Staff Standard, and Assessmant Standard affects students’
characteristic with tcalculate=1.927 and ttable=2.44. Based on the data analysis, it can be concluded that: (1) there
is the effect of the Content Standard on students’ characteristics, (2) there is no effect of the Process Standard,
Educational Staff Standard, and Assessment Standard on students’ characteristics.
Keywords: Character, National Standard Education
1. INTRODUCTION
The birth of curriculum 2013 or known as Kurtilas
is not separated from the fact that the quality of
education in Indonesia is lower than the country which
is being a benchmark. So many obstructions in
realization this curriculum, although in 2014 all of the
equipments that support it has been prepared and
distributed to the regency and the city in Indonesian for
all education’s level. So, there is no reason for the
school to do not using this curriculum. From the
interview with some students of the various levels of
education, there is some information which said that
Kurtilas is accommodative and give a space to the
students for increase creativity in sociality,
psychomotor and cognitive. If associated with the law
of education No. 20 year 2003 about national education
system which declare that the purpose of education is to
increase of student’s potential, so the students become a
man of faith, and fear of God, have a good personality,
healthy, having knowledge, competent, creative,
independent, democratic, and have responsibility
(MONE, 2003). So that, the curriculum has been
designed for the purpose of the education above. In
Law No. 20 year 2003 about national education system
article 1, paragraph 17 declare that national standard
education is the minimum criteria of the education
system in Indonesia, and article 1, paragraph 3 explain
about national standard education is education system
in Indonesia interlinked in an integrated manner to
achieve national education goals. Besides, because of
the guidance from the Law No. 20 year 2003, in 2005
the birth of government regulation No. 19 year 2005
about national standard education. In chapter 2, article
2, PP 19 year 2005 explained that “the scope of national
standard education include: 1. Standard content, 2.
Standard process, 3. Standard competence, 4. Standard
teachers and education personnel, 5. Standard facilities
and infrastructure, 6. Standard management, 7.
Standard financing, 8. Standard assessment of
education” [1]. The implementation of this curriculum
has the effect to the student’s character, so the
government through the ministry of education has been
launching national standard education mapping [2].
There are 8 standards that have achieve for the school
to get the excellent ratings (according to national
standard education (SNP)), among others are included
standard content, process, teachers and education
personnel, and facilities and infrastructure. Standard
Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, volume 464
Proceedings of the 1st Progress in Social Science, Humanities and
Education Research Symposium (PSSHERS 2019)
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Atlantis Press SARL.
This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC 4.0 license -http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. 292
content is about the pattern and the guiding for the
teacher which is reflected in the curriculum, where the
target or the goal has been cleared in that curriculum.
So, it is a standard process, without there is a studying
process where the students only will get the knowledge,
while the attitude getting less attention. Teachers and
education personnel (PTK) is the important thing in
achieving the goals in SNP. This was done because it
was almost obtained the decade Permendiknas year
2006 and 2007 in some national standards education, it
does not give the effect to the student’s characters.
There are still a lot of students of Junior high school
which are smoking during the school hours or hours of
rest outside the school, and also there are a lot of
students that going to school from the house but do not
entered the classroom. Besides that, also there is a
brawl between schools or a brawl between the students
and the society. Teach the student the habitual ways of
thinking and behaving that help individuals to work
together as a family, society, and a country. Help them
to making responsible decisions. The values contained
in the statement above are very rare. The fact today is
there are so many young generations who using drugs,
doing the brawl and also being the robbers. From all of
that facts needed to see the student’s character to
increase the quality of the education through national
standard education (NES). “How is the national
standard education influence the student’s character at
Junior high school and Islamic Junior high school in
Bukittinggi?”
The nation successful in raising the goal is not only
determined by abundant natural resources, but also
determined by the quality of human resources. A great
nation can be seen from the quality or the character of
the human. Lickona (Dalam Panduan Pelaksanaan
Pendidikan Karakter di SMP, 2011) said that a nation is
heading the ravine of destruction when the character is
pawned. “Character is a behavior, nature, personality
psychology and moral which differentiate one and
another” [3]. There are some characteristics of a nation
which is heading the ravine of destruction: 1) Cheating
2) Plagiarism 3) Copyright 4) The illegal helper of the
admission of University 5) Sale and purchase of fake
diploma. Education is the main factor in the character
building, as “schools are educational institutions which
have role and responsibility toward children character
building” [4
Doing a revolution of the character through
realignment of the national education policy by
prioritizing aspects of civic education, that puts
proportionally educational aspect, such as teaching the
history of the formation of the nation, the value of
patriotism and love the homeland, the spirit of
defending the country in Indonesian education
curriculum.
Generally, there are 4 human personalities: 1)
Koleris ; this type of personality characterized by the
personal who likes independent, assertive, fiery, like
challenges, and being the boss on himself, 2) Sanguin ;
this type characterized by the human that likes a simple
thing, happy and cheerful, like a surprise, very like
social acts and having fun, 3) Plegmatis ; the person
who including this type likes to being cooperate,
avoiding the conflicts, do not like the suddenly changes,
a good interlocutor, and likes a definite thing, 4)
Melankolis ; this personality likes a detail things,
saving anger, perfectionist, likes a clear instruction, and
routine activities.
Character is the habituation study of weaknesses,
the overcoming weakness and fixing weakness.
Therefore, the character is a gift from the God. There
are 2 aspects that can be used to see the characters of
individual: visible aspect and invisible aspect. Visible
capabilities are appearance competence which can be
observed directly by the senses of others. Meanwhile
invisible capabilities are rational competence which
known taksanomi bloom as cognitive, affective, and
psychomotor [5]. Basically, human spirit divided into 2
aspects, aspect of ability and aspect of personality.
“Aspect of ability covers learning achievement,
intelligentsia, and talent. While aspect of personality
covers characteristics, self-adjustment, interest,
emotion, attitude and motivation” [6]. Early behavior is
determining the status of knowledge and skill to get to
the future status. Early behavior is one of the
characteristic which influence the implementation and
the result of the study. According to “early behavior is a
knowledge that needs to achieve instructional goals.”
[7]. So readiness to learn in general is the ability of
someone to get the benefit from the experience. While
readiness cognition is associated with knowledge,
thought, and quality thinking of someone in facing of
the new learning situation there 18 characteristic
features in character education which can be
implementation in learning process: religious, honest,
tolerance, discipline, hard worker, creative,
independent, democratic, curiosity, nationality,
rewarding achievements, friendly/communicative,
peace love, like to read, sociality, and responsibility.
Based on the development of 18 characteristic features,
teachers try to implementing it. So it is hope to help in
building a good character of the students.
Education is the main factor in building the
character. A good education will be able to lead a
nation towards better. The government, especially The
Ministry of National Education and local government is
required to provide the service and convenience, and
also guaranteeing the quality education for each citizen
without discrimination. Meanwhile the community is
obliged to provide support resources in education. Law
No. 22 year 1999 and followed by Law No. 32 year
2004 and also Law No. 23 year 2014 about local
government, with the aim of educating the nation.
Therefore, the capital government and local
Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, volume 464
293
government as the protector and a life-changing society
become much better and guiding people to the new
things. It means that individuals jointly introduced on
responsibility in a society. Human resources, especially
teacher is a learning agent who must have 4
competences; pedagogic, personality, professionalism
and sociality (PP RI No: 19 year 2005 article 28).
According to PP. No. 74 year 2008, pedagogic
competence is the ability of the teacher in management
of learning at least the following: a. comprehension
insight or the cornerstone of education. b. the
understanding of the learners. c. the development of the
curriculum or syllabus. d. designing defenders. e.
implementation of learning that educates and dialogical.
f. utilization of learning technologies. g. evaluation of
learning process. h. development of learners to actualize
various potentials. Meanwhile personality competence
is a. faith and fair. b. have a good moral. c. wise and
prudent. d. democratic. e. steady. f. commanding. g.
stable. h. mature. i. honest. j. sportsmanship. k. become
role model for the students and the society, and
objectively evaluating its own work. l. develop
themselves independently and sustainably. The next is
sociality competence is teacher’s ability as a part of the
community which has the competence to: a. oral
communication, written or gesture politely, b. using
communication technology and information
functionally, c. effectively interact with the students,
fellow educators, leadership education units, the parents
of the students, d. associating politely with the
community by using the norm and prevailing value
system, e. applying the principle of true brotherhood,
and f. the spirit of togetherness. Then professionalism
competence is the ability of the teacher in mastering
knowledge of science, technology, and/or art and
culture which is at least cover: a. the subject matter is
broad and deep in accordance with the standards of the
program content of education unit, or learning subjects;
and b. concepts and methodology of scientific
disciplines, technology, or relevant art, that is
conceptually coherent with a shade or educational unit
program, or learning subjects. All of the competences
above is expected to produce Indonesian people which
is intelligent comprehensive and competitive. It means
that spiritual intelligent, emotionally and socially
intelligent, intelligent and witty intellectual and
aesthetic kinesthetic (RPJPN 2005-2025).
To improved skills, need to set up requirements
such as the standardization of achievement. The
standard serves as a references design and educational
development. Therefore the Ministry of Education and
Culture has been issued PP No. 32 year 2013 which
stated that the national standard education serve as a
basis for planning, implementation and monitoring of
education in order to realize the national education
quality. National standard education is a high level of
similarity with a certain degree of implementation of
the national education system. In PP No.32 year 2013
explain that national standard education is the minimum
criteria of the education system in Indonesia. So each
implementing agency education has to use educational
system based on the minimum criteria above. The aim
of the national standard education is to ensuring the
quality of national education in the framework of
educating the nation and formed the character, and also
dignified civilization There are 8 standards: a. Standard
content, b. Standard process, c. Graduate competence
standard, d. Standard teachers and education personnel,
e. Standard facilities and infrastructure, f. Standard
management, g. Standard financing, h. Standard
assessment of education.
After analyzed all of the education standards, it
found some standards that effect student’s character;
standard content, process, teachers and education
personnel, and assessment of education. Besides the
others standards are more to the preparation of facilities
and infrastructure.
Standard content is the scope of material and level
of competence as outlined in the criteria of competence
graduates, competence study materials, competence
studying subjects, and syllabus of learning that must be
filled by the learners at a certain level of education, it is
explained in the regulation of the national education
minister No. 22 year 2006. Standard content is the
criteria about the scope of material and level of
competence to achieve competence of graduates at a
certain level of education. The scope of material
formulated based on criteria charge compulsory which
determined in accordance with laws and regulations,
scientific concept, and characteristics education units
and educational programs. For the next, the level of
competence formulated based on the criteria from the
level of learner’s development, competence and
qualification Indonesia, and the mastery of tiered
competence.
Standard process is intended to assess learning and
internalization of the character and also the
establishment of competence of learners. In this case
the assessment process is conducted to assess the
activity, creativity, and the involvement of students in
learning, especially the involvement of mental,
emotional and social in establishing the competence
and character of learners. Standard process is national
standard education which related to learner process at
elementary school to achieve the graduate competence
standard, in Permendikbud No. 65 year 2013 explained
that standard process is the criteria about
implementation of learning in educational unit to
achieve the graduate competence standard. Standard
process that developed should refer to graduate
competence standard that stated as basic rule in
government No. 32 year 2013; the change toward
government rule No. 19 year 2005 about national
education standard. Therefore every educational unit
Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, volume 464
294
should do learning design in order to do learning and
evaluation process to increase efficiency and affectivity
of competence.
Standard teachers and education personnel; in this
point the researcher make a limit to academic, teacher,
headmaster academic competence standard. Teacher is
most important actor in school environment, in order to
change student’s behavior. They have the biggest
function and responsibility in learning process inside
and outside of the classroom; it is included advisory
assignment. It is necessary to have high qualification of
competence toward the teachers in order to complete
those assignments. Academic qualification, based on
national education minister rule No. 16 year 2007 about
teacher qualification stated that junior high school
teacher should have minimal education academic
qualification is bachelor in education study department
or psychology that gained into qualified department
program.
Competence in Indonesian National Ministry of
Education Rule No.16 , 2007 about teacher
qualification and competence says; the teacher in order
to make some lecture in class he or she should have
academic competences such as:
1. Pedagogic competence, teacher should
acknowledge students characteristic in some
aspects; physical, emotional, social and etc. The
teacher should acknowledge learning theory,
able to develop the curriculum, able to utilize
technology, able to communicate effectively,
able to do evaluation toward the lecture and able
to do something in order to increase the quality
of learning process.
2. Personal competence; teacher should behave and
obey appropriate public norms.
3. Social competence; in learning process, teacher
should be objective, not to be discriminative,
have good communication skills, and have good
adaptation ability toward social environment.
4. Professional competence; teacher should
acknowledge and practice the teaching structure,
material and concept.
Standard assessment; Kemendikbud (2008) in
Indonesian national education ministry No. 20 year
2007 explained some factors that is important to know
in an assessment; 1) The definition of assessment, 2)
The principle of assessment, 3) Technique and
instrument of assessment, 4) Mechanism and procedure
of assessment, 5) Assessment by educators, 6)
Assessment by the education unit, 7) Assessment by the
government. Evaluation is data compilation process to
determine how far, in what thing, and how to achieve
the aim of the education. It is also stated by the
Cronbach and Stufflebeam in that evaluation process is
not only to measure how far the aim was achieved, but
also the result will used to make a decision.
Standard of contend is related with purpose of
national education substation into spiritual, knowledge,
ability and social behavior domain. This is developed in
order to establish framework criteria and basic
competence that suitable toward competence of
graduate. Standard of process is criteria about learning
process in education field to achieve competence of
graduate’s purpose. Education is process to change
behavior to be better one. It is a basic standard that
necessary to fulfilled. National Education Standard
(Indonesia) about Teacher and Education says teacher
has full responsibility in student learning process inside
and outside of classroom, it also included as
educational advisor. It means that teachers are
necessary to have good quality of educational and
competence background that suitable with education
purpose. The most dominant competence that the
teacher should have is pedagogic; teacher should able to
acknowledge and applied the educational theory, utilize
technology, communicate effectively, develop learning
curriculum, and can conduct some action to increase
student quality. Standard of Assessment and Evaluation
of learning result is an important procedure in education
system for both students and teachers in order to
achieve learning process purpose as character building.
2. METHOD
This article use inferential descriptive
methodology. It purposed to acknowledge how far the
National Education Standard has make effect toward
character building into junior high school student in
Bukittinggi. Research populations are every junior high
school student in Bukittinggi that counted have 15
schools in total. In order to have research sample, this
article use 10 students in every school by using
Stratified Random Sampling. This article use some
instrument for character as prime date and secondary
one is national standard education system that
possessed by education and sport government
department in Bukittinggi. as data resources. Simple
regression by using Spss type 16 is analysis technique
in this article.
3. RESULT
Based on verification of data, there are 15 Junior
High School and 138 samples.
Table 1 Schools list
No
School Name
Sample
Approved
Sample
1
SMPN 1
10
10
2
SMPN 2
10
10
3
SMPN 3
10
8
4
SMPN 4
10
10
5
SMPN 5
10
9
6
SMPN 6
10
9
Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, volume 464
295
7
SMPN 7
10
10
8
SMPN 8
10
10
9
SMPS XAVERIUS
10
10
10
SMPS PSM
10
10
11
SMP AL ISLAH
10
10
12
MTsN 1
10
10
13
MTs
BAITURRUDWAH
8
8
14
MTs AL MA’RIF
8
8
15
MTs M.
MUNAWARAH
4
4
SAMPLE
140
138
4. CONCLUSION
According to data analysis for national standard
education, standard content toward student’s character
at Junior high school in Bukittinggi, can be explained
that Fh with a significance level 0,05 with sample n-
1=137 obtained for 3,149 besides Ft is about 2,44. Thus
it can be stated that there is an effect of national
standard education toward student’s character at Junior
high school and Islamic Junior high school in
Bukittinggi.
According to data analysis for national standard
education, standard process toward student’s character
at Junior high school in Bukittinggi, can be explained
that Fh with a significance level 0,05 with sample n-
1=137 obtained for 0,697 besides Ft is about 2,44. So, it
can be stated that there is no effect of national standard
education toward student’s character at Junior high
school and Islamic Junior high school in Bukittinggi.
According to data analysis for national standard
education, teachers and education personnel toward
student’s character at Junior high school in Bukittinggi,
can be explained that Fh with a significance level 0,05
with sample n-1=137 obtained for 1,771 besides Ft is
about 2,44. It can be stated that there is no effect of
national standard education toward student’s character
at Junior high school and Islamic Junior high school in
Bukittinggi.
According to data analysis for national standard
education, standard assessment toward student’s
character at Junior high school in Bukittinggi, can be
explained that Fh with a significance level 0,05 with
sample n-1=137 obtained for 2,516 besides Ft is about
2,44. It can be conclude that there is an effect of
national standard education toward student’s character
at Junior high school and Islamic Junior high school in
Bukittinggi.
1) Based on the analysis of national standard
education toward student’s character, can be conclude
that Fh with a significance level 0,05 with sample n – k
– 1 = 134 obtainable 1,927 meanwhile Ft is about 2,44.
So, there is no effect of national standard (SNP)
content, process, teachers and education personnel, and
also the assessment toward student’s character at Junior
high school and Islamic Junior high school in
Bukittinggi.
REFERENCESS
[1] Kemendiknas, “Undang-Undang RI No 20
Tahun 2003 Tentang Sistim Pendidikan
Nasional,” Jakarta; Kemendiknas. 2005
[2] Kemendikbud, “Peraturan Pemerintah No. 32
Tahun 2013 tentang Perubahan Standar Nasional
Pendidikan,” Jakarta; Kemendikbud. 2013
[3] https://id.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karakter. 03
Januari. 2016.
[4] Anwar, Hendarman, “Penguatan Pendidikan
Karakter,” Jakarta; Kementerian Pendidikan dan
kebudayaan RI, pp, 108-170. 2016.
[5] Djaali, “Psikologi Pendidikan,” Jakarta; Bumi
Aksara, pp, 44-60. 2008.
[6] Gulo, W, “Strategi Belajar Mengajar,” Jakarta;
PT Gramedia Widiasarana. 2002.
[7] Winkel, W.S, “Psikologi Pengajaran,”
Yogyakarta; Media Abadi. 2007.
Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, volume 464
296