ArticlePDF Available

Ice-sheet losses track high-end sea-level rise projections


Abstract and Figures

Observed ice-sheet losses track the upper range of the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report sea-level predictions, recently driven by ice dynamics in Antarctica and surface melting in Greenland. Ice-sheet models must account for short-term variability in the atmosphere, oceans and climate to accurately predict sea-level rise.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Ice-sheet losses track high-end sea-level rise
Observed ice-sheet losses track the upper range of the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report sea-level predictions,
recently driven by ice dynamics in Antarctica and surface melting in Greenland. Ice-sheet models must account for
short-term variability in the atmosphere, oceans and climate to accurately predict sea-level rise.
Thomas Slater, Anna E. Hogg and Ruth Mottram
The Antarctic and Greenland
ice-sheets contain enough water
to raise global sea levels by 58 m
(ref. 1) and 7 m (ref. 2), respectively. As
the largest source of potential sea-level
rise (SLR)3, modest losses from these ice
sheets will increase coastal flooding4 and
affect oceans through freshwater input5.
Accurately forecasting SLR improves flood
risk assessment and adaptation. Since
the satellite record began in the 1990s,
Antarctica and Greenland together have
raised global sea levels by 17.8 mm, and
the volume of ice lost has increased over
time1,2. Of this, 7.2 mm originate from
Antarctica where ocean-driven melting
and ice-shelf collapse have accelerated ice
flow1; the remaining 10.6 mm come from
Greenland, which, despite holding less ice,
accounts for 60% of the recent ice-sheet
contribution as oceanic and atmospheric
warming have increased ice discharge and
surface meltwater runoff2. We compare
observations of Antarctic1 and Greenland
mass change2 to IPCC Fifth Assessment
Report (AR5) SLR projections3 during
their 10-year overlap, and we assess model
skill in predicting ice dynamic and surface
mass change.
Observed and predicted mass change
Projecting the ice-sheet contribution
remains one of the most uncertain
components of the global sea-level budget3.
Progressive development of ice-sheet models
has improved their skill6 and will continue to
as descriptions of ice-sheet flow and climate
system interactions advance7. In AR5, the
ice-sheet contribution by 2100 is forecast
from process-based models simulating
changes in ice flow and surface mass balance
(SMB) in response to climate warming3.
Driven by the century-scale increase in
temperature forced by representative
concentration pathways (RCPs), global
mean SLR estimates range from 280–980
mm by 2100 (Fig. 1). Of this, the ice-sheet
contribution constitutes 4–420 mm (ref. 3).
The spread of these scenarios is uncertain,
scenario-dependent and increases rapidly
after 2030 (Fig. 1).
During 2007–2017, satellite observations
show total ice-sheet losses increased the
global sea level by 12.3 ± 2.3 mm and track
closest to the AR5 upper range (13.7–14.1
mm for all emissions pathways) (Fig. 1).
Despite a reduction in ice-sheet losses during
2013–2017 — when atmospheric circulation
above Greenland promoted cooler summer
conditions and heavy winter snowfall2 — the
observed average SLR rate (1.23 ± 0.24 mm
per year) is 45% above central predictions
(0.85 ± 0.07 mm per year) and closest to
the upper range (1.39 ± 0.14 mm per year)
(Fig. 2). These upper estimates predict an
additional 145–230 mm (179 mm mean) of
SLR from the ice sheets above the central
predictions by 2100. SLR of 150 mm will
double storm-related flooding frequency
across the west coasts of North America and
Europe and in many of the world’s largest
coastal cities4. Ice-sheet losses at the upper
end of AR5 predictions would expose 44–66
million people to annual coastal flooding
worldwide8. SLR in excess of 1 m could
require US$71 billion of annual investment
in mitigation and adaptation strategies9.
Separating ice-sheet processes
The ice-sheet response to climate forcing
comes from the SMB (net balance between
accumulation and ablation processes)
Antarctica and Greenland
1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040
Sea-level contribution (mm)
AR5 upper
AR5 mid
AR5 lower
2040 2100
Fig. 1 | Observed and predicted sea-level contribution from Antarctic and Greenland ice-sheet mass
change. The Antarctic and Greenland ice-sheet contribution to global sea level according to IMBIE1,2
(black) reconciled satellite observations and AR53 projections between 1992–2040 (left) and 2040–
2100 (right). For each AR5 emission scenario, the upper (maroon), mid (orange) and lower (yellow)
estimates are taken from the 95th percentile, median and 5th percentile values of the ensemble range,
respectively3. Within the upper, mid and lower sets, AR5 pathways are represented by darker lines in
order of increasing emissions: RCP 2.6, RCP 4.5, RCP 6.0, SRES A1B and RCP 8.5. Shaded areas represent
the spread of AR5 scenarios and the 1σ estimated error on the observations. The dashed vertical lines
indicate the period during which the satellite observations and AR5 projections overlap (2007–2017).
AR5 projections have been offset to equal the satellite record value at their start date (2007).
and the dynamic response to changes in
ice flow, calving of icebergs and melting
at the ice–ocean interface. AR5 provides
separate projections for these components
(Fig. 2)3. AR5 SMB simulations were
based on a regional climate model (RCM)
ensemble, extended with temperature-based
polynomials driven by surface air
temperatures from general circulation
models (GCMs)3. Ice dynamic contributions
were derived from studies carried out using
ice-sheet models forced by, but not coupled
to, atmospheric and oceanic model outputs.
In this way, the atmosphere and ocean can
impact the ice sheet but not vice versa. In
2013, when AR5 was released, few models
were available to simulate the complex
calving processes and ice dynamical
contributions to SLR. Instead, ice dynamics
were projected using parameterizations
for calving at selected outlet glaciers and
scaled based on the published range of SLR3.
Process-based models considered in AR5
have generally produced lower estimates
of SLR than semi-empirical models based
on palaeoclimate reconstructions10. As SLR
from SMB and dynamic components of
ice-sheet mass balance differ substantially in
Antarctica and Greenland, we consider their
contributions separately.
We compare the observed1,2 and
modelled3 ice dynamical and SMB
contributions during the overlap period
(Fig. 2). During 2007–2017, Antarctic
ice dynamics contributed 4.6 ± 2.3 mm
(Supplementary Fig. 1) to global sea level,
at the same average rate projected by the
AR5 mid-level scenario (0.47 ± 0.05 mm
per year) (Fig. 2). We note, however, a large
spread between AR5 Antarctic ice dynamic
projections, which range from 3–34 mm
by 2040, and predict a negative sea-level
contribution in the lower scenarios from
2030 (Supplementary Fig. 1). Despite all
scenarios predicting Antarctic mass gains
from increasing snowfall, the continent’s
estimated SMB (0.05 ± 0.13 mm per year)
has reduced slightly and is closest to the
upper range (–0.02 ± 0.04 mm per year).
In Greenland, dynamic ice losses estimated
from satellite observations during 2007–
2017 (0.26 ± 0.13 mm per year) track the
lower range of predictions (0.22 ± 0.04 mm
per year). However, these AR5 projections
were based on kinematic scaling and do not
explicitly simulate ice flow3. Surface mass
losses in Greenland raised global sea levels
by an estimated 4.6 ± 1.8 mm during 2007–
2017 at an average rate of 0.46 ± 0.23 mm
per year, 28% higher than the upper range of
scenarios (0.36 ± 0.06 mm per year).
High interannual variability in the
observed mass change — notably for the
Antarctic dynamic (0.46 ± 0.16 mm per
year) and Greenland surface (0.46 ± 0.23
mm per year) components (Fig. 2) — is
not reproduced in AR5 and may not
represent the longer-term mass imbalance.
For Greenland in particular, changes in
atmospheric circulation-induced11 extreme
melting12 and substantial variability in
meltwater runoff are not captured in
AR5 predictions2, which are forced by
annual temperature changes and do not
reproduce the persistence in the North
Sea-level contribution (mm yr–1)
Fig. 2 | Observed and predicted annual rates of sea-level rise from Antarctic and Greenland ice-sheet mass change and their individual ice dynamic and
surface mass components. Average annual rates of sea-level rise and their standard deviations from IMBIE1,2 (black) and AR5 (ref. 3) projections during
2007–2017, including upper (95th percentile, maroon), mid (median, orange) and lower (5th percentile, yellow) estimates. Results are partitioned into the
surface and ice dynamic mass change, along with the combined sea-level contribution from both ice sheets.
Atlantic driving these short-term weather
events. In addition, clouds modulate13
surface melting, and climate model biases
in clouds and their formation processes
may be partly responsible for both over-
and under-estimating surface melt. Future
studies would benefit from a comparison
over the full 25-year observational record,
during which satellites provide continuous
and complete coverage over both ice sheets,
to better contextualize variability within the
long-term record.
Advances in ice-sheet modelling are
expected through experiments such as the
Ice-sheet Model Intercomparison project
for CMIP6 (ISMIP6)6, which will deliver
process-based projections from standalone
ice-sheet models forced by output from
coupled atmosphere–ocean GCMs in time
for AR6 in 2022. These efforts will improve
predictions of the ice dynamical response,
particularly in Antarctica where the spread
among AR5 scenarios is large, through
advanced representations of ice–ocean
interactions which extrapolate GCM ocean
forcing into ice-shelf cavities7. Modelling of
surface processes is also improved by using
RCMs to increase the spatial resolution of
atmospheric GCM forcing and capture SMB
variations found in steep topography at
ice-sheet margins6.
Challenges remain in modelling
ice-sheet dynamic and SMB processes.
Descriptions of ice–ocean interactions are
hindered by coarse GCM resolution, and
potential feedbacks in ocean circulation
due to freshwater input are not accounted
for6. Dynamic ice loss is driven by marine
melt and iceberg calving; improved
representations of these processes in
ice-sheet models, and dense time series of
outlet glacier observations, will improve
understanding. Surface forcing for ISMIP6
experiments is provided as annual averages,
and establishing the effects of shorter-term
atmospheric variability and circulation
changes on ice-sheet SMB requires further
work. The quality of SMB forcing is also
affected by inadequacies in GCM output —
for example, in accurate representations of
clouds and surface albedo. Such challenges
can be partly addressed with two-way
coupling of Antarctic and Greenland
ice-sheet models to the atmosphere–ocean
system. However, this remains a significant
undertaking: differing spatial and temporal
resolutions required by model components
must be negotiated, and improving related
parameterizations is essential.
Ice-sheet observational and modelling
communities must also continue to
collaborate. For example, regional case
studies of extreme events driven by
short-term variability can improve our
understanding of ice-sheet processes.
Partitioning ice-sheet projections into
SMB and ice dynamics in AR6, as in AR5,
will allow these processes to be further
understood and evaluated separately. Recent
experiments have assessed the ability of
models to reproduce historical change5,14,15,
increasing confidence in sea-level
projections and gauging the likelihood
of extreme SLR from marine ice-sheet
and ice-cliff instabilities. Reducing
uncertainty in observational datasets
through collaborative processes such as
IMBIE, and generating new datasets (for
example, of SMB and ice-shelf melt rates),
will help reduce present-day biases in
ice-sheet models. Used together, ice-sheet
observations and models will continue to
inform scientific debate and climate policy
for decades to come.
Thomas Slater  1 ✉ , Anna E. Hogg2 and
Ruth Mottram  3
1Centre for Polar Observation and Modelling, School
of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds,
Leeds, UK. 2School of Earth and Environment,
University of Leeds, Leeds, UK. 3Danish
Meteorological Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Published: xx xx xxxx
1. e IMBIE Team. Nature 558, 219–222 (2018).
2. e IMBIE Team. Nature 579, 233–239 (2020).
3. IPCC Climate Change 2013: e Physical Science Basis (eds
Stocker, T. F. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013).
4. Vitousek, S. et al. Sci. Rep. 7, 1399 (2017).
5. Golledge, N. R. et al. Nature 566, 65–72 (2019).
6. Nowicki, S. M. J. et al. Geosci. Model Dev. 9, 4521–4545 (2016).
7. Pattyn, F. et al. Nat. Clim. Change 8, 1053–1061 (2018).
8. Kulp, S. A. & Strauss, B. H. Nat. Commun. 10, 4844 (2019).
9. Hinkel, J. et al. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 3292–3297 (2014).
10. Garner, A. J. et al. Earth’s Future 6, 1603–1615 (2018).
11. Bevis, M. et al. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 1934–1939 (2019).
12. Nghiem, S. V. et al. Geophys. Res. Lett. 39, L20502 (2012).
13. Hofer, S., Tedstone, A. J., Fettweis, X. & Bamber, J. L. Nat. Clim.
Change 9, 523–528 (2019).
14. Ritz, C. et al. Nature 528, 115–118 (2015).
15. Edwards, T. L. et al. Nature 566, 58–64 (2019).
This work is an outcome of the Ice-sheet Mass Balance
Inter-Comparison Exercise (IMBIE) supported by the
ESA Climate Change Initiative and the NASA Cryosphere
Program. T.S. was funded by the NERC Centre for
Polar Observation and Modelling through a Natural
Environment Research Council (cpom300001) grant,
and A.E.H. was funded by a NERC Fellowship (NE/
R012407/1). R.M. acknowledges the support of the
ESA CCI+ for Greenland ice-sheet under ESA-ESRIN
contract number 4000104815/11/I-NB and the Danish
State through the National Centre for Climate Research
(NCKF). We thank the European Space Agency, National
Aeronautics Space Administration and the German
Aerospace Centre for provision of satellite data, without
which this study would not have been possible. We also
thank A. Shepherd for leading IMBIE, which produced
the reconciled observations of ice-sheet mass change, and
for useful discussions during the course of this study. The
satellite data used here are freely available at http://imbie.
org/data-downloads/, and IPCC sea-level rise projections
can be downloaded from http://www.climatechange2013.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
is available for this paper at
... Greenland, increasing air temperatures (Hanna et al., 2021) and decreasing cloud cover (Hofer et al., 2017) have exacerbated summertime surface melting (Leeson et al., 2015;Tedesco and Fettweis, 2020) and runoff (Trusel et al., 2018;Slater et al., 2021), in tandem with the speedup (Rignot and Kanagaratnam, 2006) and retreat (King et al., 2020) of outlet glaciers responding to a warming ocean (Straneo and Heimbach, 2013). While ice sheet response to climate forcing remains the least constrained component of the twenty-first-century sea level budget (Pattyn and Morlighem, 2020;Fox-Kemper et al., 2021), 85 maintaining the long-term observational record of ice sheet mass balance is critical to improving ice sheet model skill (Edwards et al., 2021;Ritz et al., 2015) and confidence in projections of sea level rise (Aschwanden et al., 2021;Slater et al., 2020;Shepherd and Nowicki, 2017). ...
... Satellite observations of ice sheet mass balance are important for evaluating ice sheet models and their climate model forcing (Shepherd and Nowicki, 2017;Slater et al., 2020;Aschwanden et al., 2021). In their 2021 assessment (AR6), the IPCC projected ice losses from Antarctica and Greenland due to SMB and glacier dynamics under a range of emission scenarios 350 every ten years, beginning in 2020 (Fox-Kemper et al., 2021) (Figure 4). ...
Full-text available
Ice losses from the Greenland and Antarctic Ice Sheets have accelerated since the 1990s, accounting for a significant increase in global mean sea level. Here, we present a new 29-year record of ice sheet mass balance from 1992 to 2020 from the Ice Sheet Mass Balance Inter-comparison Exercise (IMBIE). We compare and combine 50 independent estimates of ice sheet mass balance derived from satellite observations of temporal changes in ice sheet flow, in ice sheet volume and in Earth’s gravity field. Between 1992 and 2020, the ice sheets contributed 21.0 ± 1.9 mm to global mean sea-level, with the rate of mass loss rising from 105 Gt yr-1 between 1992 and 1996 to 372 Gt yr-1 between 2016 and 2020. In Greenland, the rate of mass loss is 169 ± 9 Gt yr-1 between 1992 and 2020 but there are large inter-annual variations in mass balance with mass loss ranging from 86 Gt yr-1 in 2017 to 444 Gt yr-1 in 2019 due to large variability in surface mass balance. In Antarctica, ice losses continue to be dominated by mass loss from West Antarctica (-82 ± 9 Gt yr-1) and to a lesser extent from the Antarctic Peninsula (-13 ± 5 Gt yr-1). East Antarctica remains close to a state of balance (3 ± 15 Gt yr-1), but is the most uncertain component of Antarctica’s mass balance.
... In 2018, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) reported that we were likely to reach 1.5°C in the next few decades , with an estimated increase of c. 0.2°C per decade (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2018). The impacts of such climate change are already being observed (Cheng et al., 2019;EASAC, 2018;Marvel et al., 2019;Slater et al., 2020) and set to increase in severity (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2018), especially if mitigation measures against CO 2 emissions are insufficient (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2018). There is evidence that historical and current CO 2 emissions are tracking representative concentration pathway (RCP) 8.5, the most extreme in terms of fossil fuel use of all RCPs used in climate modelling (Schwalm et al., 2020). ...
Full-text available
The environmental preferences of species are an important facet of their response to changing conditions, and these have long been thought to exhibit phylogenetic conservatism. However, these bioclimatic envelopes have not previously been imputed from climate records at the date and location of occurrence, and the strength of their phylogenetic signal has not been studied at a broad scale. Here, we combine records from global climate reconstructions with contemporaneous plant occurrences for all available terrestrial plant species and test for phylogenetic niche conservatism in plant climatic traits. Global. 1901–2018. Terrestrial plants. We used >100 million plant records from the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) to produce distributions of bioclimatic envelopes for >200,000 species, using a range of climate variables. We matched species observations to historical climate reconstructions from the European Centre for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasting (ECMWF) and compared this with WorldClim climate averages. We tested for phylogenetic signal in a supertree of plants using Pagel's λ. Finally, to investigate how well bioclimatic envelopes could be inferred for poorly known and rare species, we performed cross‐validation by removing occurrence records for some common species to test how accurately their bioclimatic envelopes were estimated. We found extremely strong phylogenetic signals (λ > 0.9 in some cases) for climate variables from both climate datasets, including temperature, soil temperature, solar radiation and precipitation. We were also able to impute missing bioclimatic envelopes for artificially removed species, having a correlation with observed data of .7. We reconstructed plant climatic tolerances for >200,000 plant species historically recorded on GBIF using a technique that could be applied to any comparable biodiversity dataset. Although global information on most species is sparse, we explored methods for bias correction and data imputation, with positive results for both.
... All these phenomena are natural and contributed to model present-day coastlines. However, in the last seventy years, the effect of these drivers has increased in both intensity and frequency (IPCC The sea-level rise is a common problem that affects about 70% of coastal zones worldwide that it is accelerating and it is expected to be worst in the future (Feagin et al., 2005;Slater et al., 2020). have traditionally been used in coastal management. ...
Full-text available
Nowadays, the effects of sea-level rise can be observed in several countries of the world. The continuous rise of the mean sea-level in this century, reported by altimetry sensors and tide gauge data, and the constant increase of gas emissions, which implies the increase of global warming, will lead to global warming and more threatened areas in the future. In Brazil, the main cities are located on the coast site, which means studies that apply mapping and new projections are crucial to identify hazardous areas and prevent the worst scenario in the future. The present work consists in carrying out an analysis of the impact of sea-level rise for the end of this century in Rio Grande do Sul Coastal Plain (Southern Brazil), using three different Geographic Information Systems tools (GIS) created for this study. The tools are a product of an extensive study about sea-level models and coastal barriers that include a topographic and bathymetric survey with Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV), a systematic literature review and the digitization of cross-sections of the stratigraphic coastal barriers of Rio Grande do Sul. The study highlights the scientific production of the region, having collected all the stratigraphic surveys carried out until 2021 and discussed the rise in sea-level related to the formation of coastal barriers. The first tool, named End Point Rate for QGIS (EPR4Q), performs trend analysis of the shoreline, and was validated using the well-known Digital Software Analysis System (DSAS) and Analysing Moving Boundaries Using R (AMBUR) software. The obtained results disclosed a high statistical correlation coefficient of 0.98 and 1.00 on linear, extensive and non-extensive shorelines, respectively. The second tool, called Uncertainty Bathtub Model (uBTM), calculates the probability of sea- level flooding by uncertainties in the projections and showed high correlation values of 0.75 to 1.00 with similar tools (Terrset Sea-level Impact, and Bathub Model). The third tool, Bruun Rule for GEE model (BRGM), applies the Bruun Rule in the GIS environment. Its validation showed a value of 0.97 of statistical correlation. The EPR4Q, uBTM and BRGM tools are open to the scientific community for improvement and to adapt the code for in-house applications and scientific research. The results using EPR4Q in the coastal plain Rio Grande do Sul showed that about 28.60% of the coastline may retreat in 2100, being more severe in the southern areas. In addition, the uBTM pointed to that 38.11 Km2 to 44.57 Km2 of urban area may be lost due to sea-level flood in 2100. The BRGM model showed a shoreline retreat ranging from -298.45 m to -1.7 Km that reflects the morphodynamical differences between coastal sectors. The results underscore the importance of being warned about the impacts of sea-level rise in Rio Grande do Sul Coastal Plain to provide more evidence for politics and coastal managers so they can act in advance. Therefore, the study carried out confirmed the hypothesis that it is possible to perform initial assessments of sea-level rise with the three tools created, since the study drives similar results (i.e. identification of erosive hotspots) as previously reported from other authors.
... Compared with the AIS, the GrIS is of lower latitude, with its southernmost end being near 59°N. The combined effects of ocean and atmospheric warming have caused an increase in ice flow and surface melt runoff, accounting for 60% of the recent contribution to the global sea level rise (10.6 mm) when compared with the AIS (7.2 mm) since 1990s (Slater et al., 2020). These phenomena reflect the global significance of the GrIS in terms of environmental change. ...
Full-text available
Ice flow velocity over long time series in Greenland plays a vital role in estimating and predicting the mass balance of the Greenland Ice Sheet and its contribution to global sea level rise. However, there are few Greenland ice flow velocity products with large spatial coverage available showing the Greenland ice flow velocity pattern before the 1990s. We proposed three methods, including parallax decomposition, grid-based NCC image matching, feature and gird-based image matching with constraints for estimation of surface velocity in East Antarctica based on ARGON KH-5 and LANDSAT imagery, and a systematic compilation method for the ice surface velocity in East Antarctica from the 1960s to 1980s. Based on the above methods and cartographic processes, this study designed a framework for the mapping of the historical ice flow velocity of the Greenland ice sheet. Currently, the early LANDSAT images covering several glaciers in North Greenland and Northwest Greenland have been processed and applied to velocity mapping using the cartographic process proposed in this study, and some preliminary results have been obtained.
... DeConto and Pollard [42] estimated that Antarctica might contribute to more than 1 m and 15 m of sea-level rise by 2100 and 2500, respectively. Slater, Hogg [119] believe that the temperature-driven melting of glaciers will cause sea-level rise at the end of the century to be between 28 cm and 98 cm. From the above research, we can only predict a relatively reliable interval based on the current trend, and it is difficult to specifically determine the actual height of the sea-level rise in the future. ...
Full-text available
With the rapid development of urbanization around the world, the sea-level-rise problem is gaining more and more attention in the 21st century. Sea-level rise is the result of a combination of climate-related factors, structural factors and human activities. Recent studies related to the contributions of these factors to sea-level rise are reviewed and analyzed in this paper. The results suggest that the melting of glaciers and ice sheets have contributed the most to sea-level rise and will continue to be the dominant factor in sea-level rise for the following decades. As sea-level rise becomes an increasingly serious problem, geological disasters related to sea-level rise are also gaining more attention. To better understand the effect of sea-level rise on geological disasters, relevant issues including storm surges, seawater intrusion, the loss of coastal wetland, seismicity, seismic liquefaction and submarine mass failure are further reviewed and highlighted. In response to the risks of those disasters caused by sea-level rise, some disaster mitigation measures are proposed, and in the end, the quantitative disaster assessment concept based on resilience is introduced to the coastal urban system, to assess its ability to resist and recover from geological disasters due to the sea-level rise.
... Multiple heritage sites, including World Heritage Sites of 'Outstanding Universal Value' , are located in the low-lying coastal zone and therefore also face threats from coastal hazards due to rising sea levels. Sea levels have been rising at a faster rate over the past three decades compared with the twentieth century 6,7 , a process that is expected to gather pace through the twenty-first century 8,9 . Together with changing weather patterns 10,11 , this is expected to intensify coastal flooding 12,13 and coastal erosion 14 , exacerbating damages to coastal zone assets 15 . ...
Full-text available
The African coast contains heritage sites of ‘Outstanding Universal Value’ that face increasing risk from anthropogenic climate change. Here, we generated a database of 213 natural and 71 cultural African heritage sites to assess exposure to coastal flooding and erosion under moderate (RCP 4.5) and high (RCP 8.5) greenhouse gas emission scenarios. Currently, 56 sites (20%) are at risk from a 1-in-100-year coastal extreme event, including the iconic ruins of Tipasa (Algeria) and the North Sinai Archaeological Sites Zone (Egypt). By 2050, the number of exposed sites is projected to more than triple, reaching almost 200 sites under high emissions. Emissions mitigation from RCP 8.5 to RCP 4.5 reduces the number of very highly exposed sites by 25%. These findings highlight the urgent need for increased climate change adaptation for heritage sites in Africa, including governance and management approaches, site-specific vulnerability assessments, exposure monitoring, and protection strategies.
... Permafrost thaw and degradation, on the other hand, are irreversible on decadal to centennial timescales and have reached record levels, threatening the release of greenhouse gases from large reservoirs [13]. The increased surface melt of the Greenland Ice Sheet has contributed significantly to accelerated global sea level rise, with Greenland expected to continue as the single largest contributor to global sea level rise in the coming decades [14]. Ice sheet loss mechanisms suggest a greater vulnerability to ocean heat increases and surface melt than previously envisioned, emphasizing the potential for greater uncertainty and underestimation of Greenland's contribution to sea level rise [1,4]. ...
Full-text available
In this perspective on the future of the Arctic, we explore actions taken to mitigate warming and adapt to change since the Paris agreement on the temperature threshold that should not be exceeded in order to avoid dangerous interference with the climate system. Although 5 years may seem too short a time for implementation of major interventions, it actually is a considerable time span given the urgency at which we must act if we want to avoid crossing the 1.5 to <2 °C global warming threshold. Actions required include co-production of research exploring possible futures; supporting Indigenous rights holders’ and stakeholders’ discourse on desired futures; monitoring Arctic change; funding strategic, regional adaptation; and, deep decarbonization through transformation of the energy system coupled with negative carbon emissions. We are now in the decisive decade concerning the future we leave behind for the next generations. The Arctic’s future depends on global action, and in turn, the Arctic plays a critical role in the global future.
... Kopp et al., 2017;van den Broeke et al., 2017;Bell et al., 2018;Gudmundsson et al., 2019;Oppenheimer et al., 2019;Robel et al., 2019;Ryan et al., 2019;King et al., 2020;Pattyn and Morlighem, 2020;Seroussi et al., 2020;Slater et al., 2020;DeConto et al., 2021;Edwards et al., 2021;Joughin et al., 2021;Pan et al., 2021). These ice-sheet processes are intensely debated in the scientific community (e.g. ...
Full-text available
Climate change has various impacts on society, but future changes are uncertain and a wide gap remains between the scientific knowledge and societal action (mitigation, adaptation). The gap in climate adaptation was partly addressed by the recent growth of climate services, but their local usability is associated to many barriers. France is an example of lacking climate adaptation at territorial level, and this thesis focuses on the Gulf of Morbihan as a case study. My research aims first to identify the role of climate change in the territory, second to support the local development of adaptation planning, and third to explore future climate change through the angle of clustering approaches.To identify the local role of climate change, I analyze the literature (grey and academic) and engage in field interviews with various stakeholders. Particular features of the territory emerge: the coastal-inland contrast (economy, demography), the socioeconomic life organized seasonally, and the dependence and conflict between agriculture and tourism. The local role of climate change is complex, impacting emblematic activities (oyster farming, salt production), overlapping with existing issues (socioeconomic imbalance, land-use conflict), and affecting agriculture negatively (warmer and drier summers) but tourism positively (longer summer weather). The local experiences are generally consistent with scientific knowledge (ongoing changes, link to climate change), although some elements are scarce in local perceptions (heatwaves).To assist local adaptation, I participated to the experimentation of different foresight activities (scenario workshop, art-science exhibition, conference-debate) with local stakeholders, based on an assessment of climate services and on creative art-design tools (e.g. poker design cards). The main outcomes are two long-term scenarios, multiple short-term actions and several hinge points on which the scenarios depend. The two scenarios represent divergent visions of the territory: continued occupation of the coast despite increasing risks, or withdrawal from the coast and densification of urban areas inland. The scenarios depend on the issue development of urbanization and spatial planning, food and energy autonomy, and demographic balance. The theme of food and energy autonomy concentrates conflicting views between inhabitants, highlighting fears and desires about long-term territorial choices.My investigation of the territory highlighted several climatic themes (e.g. seasonality of weather conditions) that are linked to atmospheric circulation, but future circulation changes are highly uncertain. To investigate the future seasonality of atmospheric circulation, I classify year-round patterns of geopotential height at 500 hPa (Z500) from a reanalysis and several climate models. Despite their biases, climate models reproduce similar evolution of circulation seasonality as the reanalysis. During the last decades, winter conditions have decreased while summer conditions have increased, and these changes strengthen under future climate change. Yet circulation seasonality remains similar relatively to the increase in average Z500, and the same happens for surface temperatures associated to the circulation patterns. I additionally developed the perspective of a new approach to study the local evolution of weather seasonality, based on the classification of multiple variables (temperature, precipitation, windspeed).In addition to the effects from future climate change, the Gulf of Morbihan will probably welcome new populations, and an active collective strategy of adaptation is required. Several routes have been featured in my research to address the local needs in climate adaptation, including perspectives inspired from existing climate services in other countries. The findings from this thesis highlight the physical and social dimensions of climate change.
Recent research suggests that the effects of climate change are already tangible, making the requirement for net zero more pressing than ever. New emissions targets have been announced in April 2021 by various governments, including by the United Kingdom, United States, and China, prior to the Conference of the Parties (COP26) in Glasgow. Part of the solution for net zero will be geo-energy technologies in the subsurface, these include: mine water geothermal, aquifer thermal energy storage (ATES), enhanced geothermal systems and other thermal storage options, compressed air energy storage (CAES), and carbon dioxide capture and storage (CCS) including bioenergy CCS (BECCS). Subsurface net zero technologies have been studied by geologists at laboratory scale and with models, but also require testing at greater-than laboratory scale and in representative conditions not reproducible in laboratories and models. Test, pilot and demonstration facilities aid rock characterisation process understanding and up-scaling, and thereby provide a bridge between laboratory testing and computer modelling and full-scale operation. Examples of test sites that have progressed technology development include the Otway International Test Centre (Australia, CCS) and the Äspö Hard Rock Laboratory (Sweden, geological radioactive waste disposal). These sites have provided scale up for key research questions allowing science issues of relevance to regulation, licencing and permitting to be examined at scale in controlled environments. Successful operations at such sites allow research to be seen at first hand to inform the public, regulators, supply chain companies and investors that such technologies can work safely and economically. A Geological Society conference on the “Role of subsurface research labs in delivering net zero” in February 2021 considered the value of test sites and gaps in their capability. Gaps were identified in two areas: 1) test facilities to aid the design of low cost, high resolution, unobtrusive seismic and other monitoring for a seismically noisy urban environment with a sensitive human population, for example for ATES in urban areas; and 2) a dedicated through-fault zone test site to understand fault transmissivity and reactivation. Conference participants also recommended investment and development in test sites, shared facilities and risk, joint strategies, data interoperability and international collaboration.
The surface mass balance (SMB) of the Greenland ice sheet is subject to considerable uncertainties that complicate predictions of sea level rise caused by climate change. We examine the SMB of the Greenland ice sheet in the 21st century with the Bergen Snow Simulator (BESSI) surface energy and mass balance model. To estimate the uncertainty of the SMB, we conduct simulations for four greenhouse gas emission scenarios using the output of a wide range of Earth system models (ESMs) from the sixth phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6) to force BESSI. In addition, the uncertainty of the SMB simulation is estimated by using 16 different parameter sets in our SMB model. The median SMB across ESMs and parameter sets, integrated over the ice sheet, decreases over time for every emission scenario. As expected, the decrease in SMB is stronger for higher greenhouse gas emissions. The regional distribution of the resulting SMB shows the most substantial SMB decrease in western Greenland for all ESMs, whereas the differences between the ESMs are most pronounced in the north and around the equilibrium line. Temperature and precipitation are the input variables of the snow model that have the largest influence on the SMB and the largest differences between ESMs. In our ensemble, the range of uncertainty in the SMB is greater than in previous studies that used fewer ESMs as forcing. An analysis of the different sources of uncertainty shows that the uncertainty caused by the different ESMs for a given scenario is larger than the uncertainty caused by the climate scenarios. In comparison, the uncertainty caused by the snow model parameters is negligible, leaving the uncertainty of the ESMs as the main reason for SMB uncertainty.
Full-text available
In recent decades, the Greenland Ice Sheet has been a major contributor to global sea-level rise1,2, and it is expected to be so in the future³. Although increases in glacier flow4–6 and surface melting7–9 have been driven by oceanic10–12 and atmospheric13,14 warming, the degree and trajectory of today’s imbalance remain uncertain. Here we compare and combine 26 individual satellite measurements of changes in the ice sheet’s volume, flow and gravitational potential to produce a reconciled estimate of its mass balance. Although the ice sheet was close to a state of balance in the 1990s, annual losses have risen since then, peaking at 335 ± 62 billion tonnes per year in 2011. In all, Greenland lost 3,800 ± 339 billion tonnes of ice between 1992 and 2018, causing the mean sea level to rise by 10.6 ± 0.9 millimetres. Using three regional climate models, we show that reduced surface mass balance has driven 1,971 ± 555 billion tonnes (52%) of the ice loss owing to increased meltwater runoff. The remaining 1,827 ± 538 billion tonnes (48%) of ice loss was due to increased glacier discharge, which rose from 41 ± 37 billion tonnes per year in the 1990s to 87 ± 25 billion tonnes per year since then. Between 2013 and 2017, the total rate of ice loss slowed to 217 ± 32 billion tonnes per year, on average, as atmospheric circulation favoured cooler conditions¹⁵ and as ocean temperatures fell at the terminus of Jakobshavn Isbræ¹⁶. Cumulative ice losses from Greenland as a whole have been close to the IPCC’s predicted rates for their high-end climate warming scenario¹⁷, which forecast an additional 50 to 120 millimetres of global sea-level rise by 2100 when compared to their central estimate.
Full-text available
Most estimates of global mean sea-level rise this century fall below 2 m. This quantity is comparable to the positive vertical bias of the principle digital elevation model (DEM) used to assess global and national population exposures to extreme coastal water levels, NASA’s SRTM. CoastalDEM is a new DEM utilizing neural networks to reduce SRTM error. Here we show – employing CoastalDEM—that 190 M people (150–250 M, 90% CI) currently occupy global land below projected high tide lines for 2100 under low carbon emissions, up from 110 M today, for a median increase of 80 M. These figures triple SRTM-based values. Under high emissions, CoastalDEM indicates up to 630 M people live on land below projected annual flood levels for 2100, and up to 340 M for mid-century, versus roughly 250 M at present. We estimate one billion people now occupy land less than 10 m above current high tide lines, including 250 M below 1 m.
Full-text available
Recently, the Greenland Ice Sheet (GrIS) has become the main source of barystatic sea-level rise1,2. The increase in the GrIS melt is linked to anticyclonic circulation anomalies, a reduction in cloud cover and enhanced warm-air advection3–7. The Climate Model Intercomparison Project fifth phase (CMIP5) General Circulation Models (GCMs) do not capture recent circulation dynamics; therefore, regional climate models (RCMs) driven by GCMs still show significant uncertainties in future GrIS sea-level contribution, even within one emission scenario5,8–10. Here, we use the RCM Modèle Atmosphèrique Règional to show that the modelled cloud water phase is the main source of disagreement among future GrIS melt projections. We show that, in the current climate, anticyclonic circulation results in more melting than under a neutral-circulation regime. However, we find that the GrIS longwave cloud radiative effect is extremely sensitive to the modelled cloud liquid-water path, which explains melt anomalies of +378 Gt yr–1 (+1.04 mm yr–1 global sea level equivalent) in a +2 °C-warmer climate with a neutral-circulation regime (equivalent to 21% more melt than under anticyclonic circulation). The discrepancies between modelled cloud properties within a high-emission scenario introduce larger uncertainties in projected melt volumes than the difference in melt between low- and high-emission scenarios¹¹.
Full-text available
Government policies currently commit us to surface warming of three to four degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels by 2100, which will lead to enhanced ice-sheet melt. Ice-sheet discharge was not explicitly included in Coupled Model Intercomparison Project phase 5, so effects on climate from this melt are not currently captured in the simulations most commonly used to inform governmental policy. Here we show, using simulations of the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets constrained by satellite-based measurements of recent changes in ice mass, that increasing meltwater from Greenland will lead to substantial slowing of the Atlantic overturning circulation, and that meltwater from Antarctica will trap warm water below the sea surface, creating a positive feedback that increases Antarctic ice loss. In our simulations, future ice-sheet melt enhances global temperature variability and contributes up to 25 centimetres to sea level by 2100. However, uncertainties in the way in which future changes in ice dynamics are modelled remain, underlining the need for continued observations and comprehensive multi-model assessments.
Full-text available
Predictions for sea-level rise this century due to melt from Antarctica range from zero to more than one metre. The highest predictions are driven by the controversial marine ice-cliff instability (MICI) hypothesis, which assumes that coastal ice cliffs can rapidly collapse after ice shelves disintegrate, as a result of surface and sub-shelf melting caused by global warming. But MICI has not been observed in the modern era and it remains unclear whether it is required to reproduce sea-level variations in the geological past. Here we quantify ice-sheet modelling uncertainties for the original MICI study and show that the probability distributions are skewed towards lower values (under very high greenhouse gas concentrations, the most likely value is 45 centimetres). However, MICI is not required to reproduce sea-level changes due to Antarctic ice loss in the mid-Pliocene epoch, the last interglacial period or 1992–2017; without it we find that the projections agree with previous studies (all 95th percentiles are less than 43 centimetres). We conclude that previous interpretations of these MICI projections over-estimate sea-level rise this century; because the MICI hypothesis is not well constrained, confidence in projections with MICI would require a greater range of observationally constrained models of ice-shelf vulnerability and ice-cliff collapse.
Full-text available
From early 2003 to mid-2013, the total mass of ice in Greenland declined at a progressively increasing rate. In mid-2013, an abrupt reversal occurred, and very little net ice loss occurred in the next 12–18 months. Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) and global positioning system (GPS) observations reveal that the spatial patterns of the sustained acceleration and the abrupt deceleration in mass loss are similar. The strongest accelerations tracked the phase of the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO). The negative phase of the NAO enhances summertime warming and insolation while reducing snowfall, especially in west Greenland, driving surface mass balance (SMB) more negative, as illustrated using the regional climate model MAR. The spatial pattern of accelerating mass changes reflects the geography of NAO-driven shifts in atmospheric forcing and the ice sheet’s sensitivity to that forcing. We infer that southwest Greenland will become a major future contributor to sea level rise.
Full-text available
The modern era of scientific global-mean sea level rise (SLR) projections began in the early 1980s. In subsequent decades, understanding of driving processes has improved, and new methodologies have been developed. Nonetheless, despite more than 70 studies, future SLR remains deeply uncertain. To facilitate understanding of the historical development of SLR projections and contextualize current projections, we have compiled a comprehensive database of 21st century global SLR projections. Although central estimates of 21st century global-mean SLR have been relatively consistent, the range of projected SLR has varied greatly over time. Among studies providing multiple estimates, the range of upper projections shrank from 1.3–1.8 m during the 1980s to 0.6–0.9 m in 2007, before expanding again to 0.5–2.5 m since 2013. Upper projections of SLR from individual studies are generally higher than upper projections from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, potentially due to differing percentile bounds or a predisposition of consensus-based approaches toward relatively conservative outcomes.
Full-text available
The Antarctic Ice Sheet is an important indicator of climate change and driver of sea-level rise. Here we combine satellite observations of its changing volume, flow and gravitational attraction with modelling of its surface mass balance to show that it lost 2,720 ± 1,390 billion tonnes of ice between 1992 and 2017, which corresponds to an increase in mean sea level of 7.6 ± 3.9 millimetres (errors are one standard deviation). Over this period, ocean-driven melting has caused rates of ice loss from West Antarctica to increase from 53 ± 29 billion to 159 ± 26 billion tonnes per year; ice-shelf collapse has increased the rate of ice loss from the Antarctic Peninsula from 7 ± 13 billion to 33 ± 16 billion tonnes per year. We find large variations in and among model estimates of surface mass balance and glacial isostatic adjustment for East Antarctica, with its average rate of mass gain over the period 1992–2017 (5 ± 46 billion tonnes per year) being the least certain.
Full-text available
Global climate change drives sea-level rise, increasing the frequency of coastal flooding. In most coastal regions, the amount of sea-level rise occurring over years to decades is significantly smaller than normal ocean-level fluctuations caused by tides, waves, and storm surge. However, even gradual sea-level rise can rapidly increase the frequency and severity of coastal flooding. So far, global-scale estimates of increased coastal flooding due to sea-level rise have not considered elevated water levels due to waves, and thus underestimate the potential impact. Here we use extreme value theory to combine sea-level projections with wave, tide, and storm surge models to estimate increases in coastal flooding on a continuous global scale. We find that regions with limited water-level variability, i.e., short-tailed flood-level distributions, located mainly in the Tropics, will experience the largest increases in flooding frequency. The 10 to 20 cm of sea-level rise expected no later than 2050 will more than double the frequency of extreme water-level events in the Tropics, impairing the developing economies of equatorial coastal cities and the habitability of low-lying Pacific island nations.
Even if anthropogenic warming were constrained to less than 2 °C above pre-industrial, the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets will continue to lose mass this century, with rates similar to those observed over the past decade. However, nonlinear responses cannot be excluded, which may lead to larger rates of mass loss. Furthermore, large uncertainties in future projections still remain, pertaining to knowledge gaps in atmospheric (Greenland) and oceanic (Antarctica) forcing. On millennial timescales, both ice sheets have tipping points at or slightly above the 1.5–2.0 °C threshold; for Greenland, this may lead to irreversible mass loss due to the surface mass balance–elevation feedback, whereas for Antarctica, this could result in a collapse of major drainage basins due to ice-shelf weakening.