ArticlePDF Available

EAT Framework 2020 word version

August 2020

Authors:

Griffith University

This is the 2020 extended version of the EAT Framework with additional information on developing assessment practice for attainment of fellowships

Content uploaded by Carol Evans

Content may be subject to copyright.

A preview of the PDF is not available

ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.

ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any references for this publication.

Chapter

Exploring prima’s first steps in practice

January 2000

Marjolein B. A. van Asselt

The retrospective study on rivm’s series of Environmental Outlooks as discussed in the previous Chapters indicated a potential need for a systematic framework for uncertainty management. One of the ambitions of this thesis is to test whether the proposed prima approach can satisfy this need, not only theoretically, but also in practical terms. In the first part of this thesis we argued that from ... [Show full abstract] a theoretical, philosophical point of view applying the prima approach would improve the quality of Integrated Assessment endeavours. In the current Chapter, we will explore whether and how this potential improvement can be realised in practise. The key question addressed in this Chapter thus holds: Is it possible and if so in what way, to use the prima approach in assessment practice in a practically feasible manner as to improve the quality of the assessment?

Article

Framework for an Integrated Assessment of Health, Climate Change, and Ecosystem Vulnerability

January 1995 · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

Paul R. Epstein

Article

An Integrated Assessment approach to linking biophysical modelling and economic valuation tools

May 2010

Marit Ellen Kragt

Integrated assessment is rapidly developing in the scientific as well as policy community. Different methods, techniques and procedures (i.e., tools) are used in these assessments. Often, the choice for using certain tools in an assessment is not well founded. This paper presents a framework that scientifically underpins the role of, and thus choice for, tools within an integrated assessment. The ... [Show full abstract] framework identifies four phases in an integrated assessment, which are derived from the complementarities between various forms of integrated assessments. Tasks have to be done within each of the four phases. Seven types of tools with similar characteristics are matched to those tasks. The tool framework is a theoretical construct, developed whilst keeping in mind perceptions and suggestions from eventual users. It is a first step in the development of an overarching framework for finding appropriate tools for different tasks in an assessment, and justifying the use of those tools.

Technical Report

Full-text available