ArticlePDF Available

The Differential Impact of COVID‐19 on the Work Conditions of Women and Men Academics during the Lockdown

Authors:

Abstract

That the COVID‐19 pandemic has affected the work conditions of large segments of the society is in no doubt. A growing body of journalistic accounts raised the possibility that the lockdown caused by the pandemic affects women and men in different ways, due mostly to the traditionally gendered division of labor in the society. We attempt to test this oft‐cited argument by conducting an original survey with nearly 200 academics. Specifically, we explore the extent to which the effect of the lockdown on child‐care, housework and home‐office environment varies across women and men. Our results show that a number of factors are associated with the effect of the lockdown on the work conditions of academics at home, including gender, having children, perceived threat from COVID‐19, and satisfaction with work environment. We also show that having children disproportionately affects women in terms of the amount of housework during the lockdown.
FEMINIST FRONTIERS
The differential impact of COVID-19 on the work
conditions of women and men academics during
the lockdown
T. Murat Yildirim| Hande Eslen-Ziya
Department of Media and Social Sciences,
University of Stavanger
Correspondence
T. Murat Yildirim, Department of Media and
Social Sciences, University of Stavanger, Kjell
Arholms gate 41, 4021 Stavanger, Norway.
Email: murat.yildirim@uis.no
That the COVID-19 pandemic has affected the work condi-
tions of large segments of society is in no doubt. A growing
body of journalistic accounts raised the possibility that the
lockdown caused by the pandemic has affected women and
men in different ways, due mostly to the traditionally
gendered division of labour in society. We attempt to test
this oft-cited argument by conducting an original survey
with nearly 200 academics. Specifically, we explore the
extent to which the effect of the lockdown on childcare,
housework and home-office environment varies across
women and men. Our results show that a number of factors
are associated with the effect of the lockdown on the work
conditions of academics at home, including gender, having
children, perceived threat from COVID-19 and satisfaction
with the work environment. We also show that having
children disproportionately affects women in terms of the
amount of housework during the lockdown.
KEYWORDS
academics, COVID-19, daily routines, gender, housework,
lockdown
T. Murat Yildirim and Hande Eslen-Ziya contributed equally to this work.
Received: 27 June 2020 Revised: 27 July 2020 Accepted: 13 August 2020
DOI: 10.1111/gwao.12529
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and
reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
© 2020 The Authors. Gender, Work & Organization published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd
Gender Work Organ. 2020;17. wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/gwao 1
1|INTRODUCTION
That the lockdown caused by the COVID-19 pandemic has had differential impact on women and men across the
globe has received much recognition. The closure of schools and day care facilities has dramatically increased
childcare responsibilities, impacting parentsdivision of labour at home significantly. Recent accounts have shown
that the work and family boundaries became indistinct, and the gendered distribution of responsibilities within the
household became more apparent (Alon, Doepke, Olmstead-Rumsey, & Tertilt, 2020; Cui, Ding, & Zhu, 2020). Some
accounts go so far as to suggest that gender inequalities worsened during the lockdown (Minello, 2020). For working
women, this typically meant increased responsibilities as the main care provider and as an employee who needs to
work from home. Previously described as the double burden or the second shift, this brought forth an overwhelming
demand from both family and work (Hochschild & Machung, 2012).
In an attempt to understand the extent to which the pandemic-related lockdown has affected women and men
working in higher education, we designed a survey that asked a series of questions related to the experiences of
cademics from various countries, including Norway, Sweden, Italy, France, Germany, the United States and the UK,
among others. In particular, we examined the correlates of perceived changes in housework and childcare
responsibilities, as well as the work conditions of academics. Our results from a series of ordered logistic regressions
indicate that having children is the most important predictor of perceived changes related to work and housework,
with women reported being more heavily affected. Perhaps more importantly, we show that the lockdown's impact
on individuals varied significantly by whether one had children. Specifically, women with children have reported
being affected considerably more, compared with individuals without children.
2|THEORETICAL EXPECTATIONS
In this article, we take critical gender theory as the basis of our theoretical framework where gender is defined as a
social constructed definition of biological sex where dos and donts of masculinity and femininity are shaped by
cultural ideals and social institutions (Acker, 1990; Connell, 2002; West & Zimmerman, 1987). Such gendered
construction in return results in creating and maintaining structural inequalities at all levels among which higher
education institutions are no exception. In fact, universities have long been gendered with strong hierarchy and
inequality between women and men academics, with the gap remaining wide in favour of the latter group (OHagan
et al., 2019). Such structural inequality gets even more enhanced once women have children and caring responsibili-
ties at home. This double burden constitutes one of the obstacles towards the worklife balance where the negative
spillover between paid work and domestic duties influences women enormously (Fleetwood, 2007).
We argue that the lockdown caused by the pandemic has worsened this dynamic. For instance, Jessen and
Waights (2020) report that working mothers combined childcare and homeschooling with their paid work during this
period by working long hours in the evening. Likewise, Andersen, Nielsen, Simone, Lewiss, and Jagsi (2020) show
that the pandemic has led women to devote more time to childcare and homeschooling responsibilities, where men
remained relatively less affected. The authors go on to argue that the pandemic had a differential impact on the
research productivity of women and men. We join this growing body of research in an attempt to advance our
understanding of the pandemic-related changes in the working conditions of women and men in higher education
institutions.
3|DATA AND METHODS
To advance our understanding of how the COVID-19 pandemic has affected the work conditions of academics, we
fielded an online survey between 10 and 20 June 2020 via a cloud-based survey platform. In addition to commonly
2YILDIRIM AND ESLEN-ZIYA
used sociodemographic questions, the survey asked respondents a wide range of questions concerning their percep-
tions of the work environment at home during the lockdown. We circulated our survey both within and outside our
networks, mainly by posting our survey on the social media pages of various academic organizations. In total over
460 respondents have engaged with our survey, where 42 per cent of the respondents (n= 198) have completed
it. Among those who completed the survey, 65 per cent were women and 55 per cent were social scientists. Slightly
more than half of our respondents hold a permanent position, where those with less than five-year post-PhD experi-
ence constitute around 30 per cent of our sample. Finally, our sample is highly diverse in terms of the country of res-
idence of our respondents; about 90 per cent of our sample consist of academics working in France, Germany, Italy,
Norway, Sweden, Turkey, UK and the United States. We report the descriptive statistics of key variables in Table 1.
We utilize four ordinal dependent variables that measure the perceived changes in housework and work condi-
tions after the pandemic. We specifically asked how the pandemic has affected the respondent's (i) time spent on
work; (ii) routines in housework; (iii) routines in childcare; as well as (iv) how their contribution to housework has
been affected by the lockdown. Accordingly, we estimate a series of ordered logistic regressions, where we control
for a number of factors such as family income (single income = 1), satisfaction with home-office, satisfaction with
economic wellbeing, having children, holding a tenured position, age and being a social scientist.1
4|RESULTS
We report our findings from a series of ordered logistic regressions in Table 2, where we explore how the lockdown
has affected academicswork time (Model 1), routines in housework (Model 2) and in childcare (Model 3), and
TABLE 1 Descriptive statistics
Variable Obs Mean Std. dev. Min Max
Perceived threat from COVID
a
230 0.296 0.457 0 1
Home-office
b
223 3.816 1.169 1 (not at all) 5 (a great deal)
Housework
c
209 3.522 1.248 1 (not at all) 5 (a great deal)
Childcare
d
101 3.515 1.411 1 (not at all) 5 (a great deal)
Contribution to chores
e
205 2.502 0.607 1 (less of my time) 3 (more of my time)
Satisfaction with economic wellbeing
f
200 3.275 1.098 1 (not at all) 5 (a great deal)
Single income 200 0.355 0.48 0 1
Satisfaction with workspace at home
g
188 3.202 1.124 1 (not at all) 5 (a great deal)
Tenured 184 0.516 0.501 0 1
Age 184 2.897 1.038 1 5
Without child 253 0.356 0.48 0 1
Full professor 253 0.17 0.376 0 1
Social scientist 253 0.379 0.486 0 1
Gender (1 = woman) 253 0.474 0.5 0 1
a
Are you concerned that COVID-19 is more dangerous for you as an individual?
b
How did COVID-19 influence the time that you are spending on your work?
c
How do you think the COVID-19 pandemic has changed your routines in housework?
d
How do you think the COVID-19 pandemic has changed your routines in childcare?
e
Compared to what it was prior to the outbreak, your contribution to house chores is taking: [less of my time, same amount
of time, more of my time].
f
How satisfied are you with your economic wellbeing?
g
How would you rate your satisfaction with your workspace at home?
YILDIRIM AND ESLEN-ZIYA 3
perceived changes in the contributions to housework (Model 4) during the period they worked from home. As seen
in the models, the gender variable is positive in all four models and statistically significant in two of the models, indi-
cating mixed evidence that the pandemic has disproportionately affected the work conditions of women academics
during the lockdown, compared with their male counterparts. In particular, women reported being affected at greater
rates in terms of their routines in childcare (p< 0.01) and in housework (p< 0.1). Furthermore, academics without
children reported being affected significantly less while those who perceived greater risk from COVID-19 reported
being affected significantly more by the lockdown. Satisfaction with the work environment at home and with eco-
nomic wellbeing appears to be important factors in explaining perceived changes in one experience with the lock-
down, though they come up statistically significant only in two models and at the p< 0.1 level.
Table 2 shows that having children appears to be one of the most important predictors of the perceived effect of
the pandemic. We delve further into this particular finding by interacting the without childvariable with gender to
explore whether having children affects female and male academics in similar ways. Figure 1 illustrates the substan-
tive impact of gender on daily routines at home across households with and without children, where the predicted
outcomes are COVID-19 has greatly affected my routines in houseworkand my contribution to housework takes
more of my time after the pandemic. As the figure on the left-hand side shows, women with children have stated at
greater rates that the pandemic has affected their routines in housework. In contrast, the gender gap is statistically
indistinguishable among households without children. While the figure on the right-hand side shows the gender gap
in the likelihood of saying housework takes more of my time after the pandemicamong the couples with children
TABLE 2 The impact of COVID-19 on the daily routines of academics
Effect on work
from home
Routines in
housework
Routines in
childcare
Contribution to
housework
Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4
Women 0.515* (0.308) 0.477 (0.293) 1.208*** (0.449) 0.417 (0.330)
Without child 0.541* (0.302) 0.836*** (0.298) 0.838** (0.332)
Single income household 0.602* (0.308) 0.361 (0.295) 0.448 (0.527) 0.180 (0.325)
Satisfaction with
workspace at home
0.259* (0.137) 0.0206 (0.126) 0.347* (0.210) 0.0162 (0.141)
Satisfaction with economic
wellbeing
0.278* (0.144) 0.189 (0.135) 0.0555 (0.197) 0.00661 (0.152)
Perceived risk from
COVID-19
0.566* (0.336) 0.828*** (0.316) 0.877* (0.519) 0.710** (0.359)
Full professor 0.0870 (0.414) 0.0459 (0.395) 0.572 (0.515) 0.277 (0.439)
Tenured 0.205 (0.338) 0.259 (0.330) 0.635 (0.473) 0.184 (0.370)
Social scientist 0.0466 (0.282) 0.0601 (0.274) 0.492 (0.429) 0.0597 (0.306)
Age 0.00183 (0.175) 0.202 (0.164) 0.804*** (0.266) 0.0213 (0.186)
Constant cut 1 4.225*** (0.820) 3.409*** (0.767) 4.038*** (1.191) 3.030*** (0.858)
Constant cut 2 3.651*** (0.798) 2.321*** (0.745) 3.280*** (1.162) 0.556 (0.816)
Constant cut 3 1.989*** (0.760) 1.137 (0.731) 2.432** (1.131)
Constant cut 4 0.939 (0.746) 0.0381 (0.722) 0.977 (1.100)
Pseudo R
2
0.043 0.034 0.073 0.038
Observations 180 183 89 184
Standard errors in parentheses.
***p< 0.01;
**p< 0.05; p< 0.1.
*p< 0.1.
4YILDIRIM AND ESLEN-ZIYA
almost disappears, it is still clear that having children has no impact on the housework routines of men. What is more,
relative to women without children, women with children found housework much more time-consuming.
5|DISCUSSION
Our findings based on an original survey with academics show that while the gender gap in the extent to which the
pandemic has affected the working conditions of academics is only weak, the gap becomes alarming among aca-
demics with children. Specifically, we show that the daily routines of women academics with children have been dis-
proportionately affected by the pandemic-related lockdown. These findings are greatly in line with the findings
suggesting that:
academic work in which career advancement is based on the number and quality of a person's scientific publica-
tions, and their ability to obtain funding for research projects is basically incompatible with tending to children
(Minello, 2020, p. 1)
and that having children leads to reductions in the academic productivity of women, but not men (Lutter &
Schröder, 2020, p. 442). Our findings also lend strong support to recent research that found similar gender gaps in
the broader population (Collins, Landivar, Ruppanner, & Scarborough, 2020). As schools and childcare facilities were
closed during the pandemic, households with children were left with childcare responsibilities including their
homeschooling on a daily basis. Our findings imply that the traditionally gendered distribution of labour within the
household disproportionately affects men and women working as academics, even among dual-income families.
Although our data do not allow us to tell more about the causal mechanism at work, one possibility is that the lock-
down may have forced women working in academia to prioritize care-taking responsibilities in line with cultural
ideals of the good mother(Collins, 2020; Sutherland, 2010), bolstering the traditional gender roles at home.
In the absence of concrete projections as to when higher education institutions will return to normal, we pro-
ceed with caution in interpreting the implications of our findings for the working conditions of academics in the near
future. However, the gender gap in perceived challenges related to increased caregiving demands among academics
is not likely to wane soon if the pandemic worsens in the coming months to further aggravate the disruption of
FIGURE 1 The interactive effects of gender and having children on housework
YILDIRIM AND ESLEN-ZIYA 5
routines at work and home. The growing importance of distance learning in the coming semester will surely require
many academics from across the globe to reorganize their teaching strategy to go online, which might come at the
expense of academicsresearch activities. Hence, while it is early to tell the long-term consequences of this trend for
academicsresearch activity, the gender gap in perceived disruptions in daily routines may translate into gendered
disparities in research productivity. Future research delving further into these possibilities might help us better
understand how the pandemic has affected, and will continue to affect, families from across the globe.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The survey utilized in this study was designed in collaboration with Selcen Ozturkcan, who we thank for her
extremely constructive comments on an earlier version of this manuscript. We would also like to thank the editors
and the reviewers for their helpful suggestions.
DECLARATION OF CONFLICTING INTERESTS
The authors declared no potential conflicts of interests with respect to the authorship and/or publication of this
article.
ORCID
T. Murat Yildirim https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7120-6020
Hande Eslen-Ziya https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7113-6771
ENDNOTE
1
There is no multicollinearity among our variables. The correlation between tenured and full professor is 0.48, whereas the
correlation between full professor and age is 0.47.
REFERENCES
Acker, J. (1990). Hierarchies, jobs and bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender & Society,4(2), 139158.
Alon, T., Doepke, M., Olmstead-Rumsey, J., & Tertilt, M. (2020). The impact of COVID-19 on gender equality (Mimeo).
Andersen, J. P., Nielsen, M. W., Simone, N. L., Lewiss, R., & Jagsi, R. (2020). Meta-research: COVID-19 medical papers have
fewer women first authors than expected. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/2005/2005.06303.pdf
Collins, C. (2020). Is maternal guilt a cross-national experience? Qualitative Sociology,129. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.
12506
Collins, C., Landivar, L. C., Ruppanner, L., & Scarborough, W. J. (2020). COVID-19 and the gender gap in work hours. Gender,
Work and Organization. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12506
Connell, R. W. (2002). Gender. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Cui, R., Ding, H., & Zhu, F. (2020). Gender inequality in research productivity during the COVID-19 pandemic. Available at
SSRN: 3623492
Fleetwood, S. (2007). Why worklife balance now? The International Journal of Human Resource Management,18(3),
387400.
Hochschild, A., & Machung, A. (2012). The second shift: Working families and the revolution at home. New York, NY: Penguin.
Jessen, J., & Waights, S. (2020). Effects of COVID-19 day care centre closures on parental time use: Evidence from Ger-
many. Retrieved from https://voxeu.org/article/covid-19-day-care-centre-closures-and-parental-time-use
Lutter, M., & Schröder, M. (2020). Is there a motherhood penalty in academia? The gendered effect of children on academic
publications in German sociology. European Sociological Review,36(3), 442459.
Minello, A. (2020). The pandemic and the female academic. Nature. Retrieved from https://www.nature.com/articles/
d41586-020-01135-9
OHagan, C., OConnor, P., Myers, E. S., Baisner, L., Apostolov, G., Topuzova, I., & Ça
glayan, H. (2019). Perpetuating academic
capitalism and maintaining gender orders through career practices in STEM in universities. Critical Studies in Education,
60(2), 205225.
Sutherland, J.-A. (2010). Mothering, guilt and shame. Sociology Compass,4, 310321.
West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender & Society,1(2), 125151.
6YILDIRIM AND ESLEN-ZIYA
AUTHOR BIOGRAPHIES
T. Murat Yildirim is a postdoctoral researcher at the University of Stavanger. His research focuses on legislative
behavior, public opinion and gender politics, and has appeared in various journals including Journal of European
Public Policy, Party Politics, Policy Studies Journal, Legislative Studies Quarterly, and Political Research Quar-
terly, among others.
Hande Eslen-Ziya has an established interest in gender and social inequalities, transnational organisations and
digital activism, and has a substantial portfolio of research in this field. Currently she co-edited the book titled
The Aesthetics of Global Protest: Visual Culture and Communication published at Amsterdam University Press.
Eslen-Ziya is the Co-I of Covid-19 project funded by the Norwegian Research Council (2020-2022): Fighting
pandemics with enhanced risk communication: Messages, compliance and vulnerability during the COVID-19
outbreakDr. Eslen-Ziya is an Associate Prof. of Sociology at the University of Stavanger and founder of the
Populism, Anti-Gender and Democracy Research Group.
How to cite this article: Yildirim TM, Eslen-Ziya H. The differential impact of COVID-19 on the work
conditions of women and men academics during the lockdown. Gender Work Organ. 2020;17. https://doi.
org/10.1111/gwao.12529
YILDIRIM AND ESLEN-ZIYA 7
... The COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated the gender gap in caregiving and household responsibilities between men and women (Dunatchik et al., 2021;Frank et al., 2021;Johnston et al., 2020;Power, 2020;Yildirim & Eslen-Ziya, 2021). The mandatory school and daycare closures, followed by intermittent and sporadic closures due to COVID-19 exposure, resulted in an increased need for childcare and remote schooling. ...
... Finally, we examined the intersection of gender, researcher productivity, and caregiving status. Our findings echo recent research suggesting that women were primarily responsible for caregiving during the pandemic (Dunatchik et al., 2021;Johnston et al., 2020;Power, 2020;Yildirim & Eslen-Ziya, 2021). Although not explicitly asked about in this study, during interviews, women participants highlighted the demands and time-consuming nature of remote schooling for school-aged children. ...
... We focus on these variables because COVID-19 is a more significant threat to some age groups and ethnic backgrounds than others [32]. We also investigate the association between sex and skepticism because the pandemic has been found to have a different impact on people depending on their biological sex [33,34]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Skepticism of COVID-19 has consequences for public health. We examined several variables that we reasoned were related to skepticism, including demographic factors, people’s perceptions and experiences related to COVID-19, and social media usage. The sample consisted of 294 participants recruited in April of 2020. Participants filled out a survey that included questions related to demographics, social media use, COVID-19 anxiety, COVID-19 interference, and COVID-19 skepticism. In the main, biological sex, ethnicity, and social media use were not significantly associated with skepticism regarding COVID-19. Alternatively, older participants and those who experienced greater anxiety related to the pandemic were less skeptical of COVID-19. Interestingly, people who experienced more interference in their lives because of COVID-19 were more skeptical of the pandemic. Finally, social media use moderated the influence of anxiety and interference on skepticism. The negative effect of anxiety on skepticism became weaker as people’s use of social media increased. The positive effect of interference related to COVID-19 on skepticism became stronger as people used more social media. Our findings underscore the importance of personal beliefs, attitudes, and experiences when explaining skepticism of the pandemic.
Article
The authors explore how the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic amplified a broad range of care practices for women in academia. Engaging the lived experiences of faculty and research staff members, the authors investigate the entangled impact of care on work-life productivity during the first year and a half of the global pandemic. Mixed-methods data include roundtable accounts focusing on the COVID-19 experiences of woman employees at a Canadian university with supplementary analyses from a related institutional survey. The findings demonstrate a triangulated configuration of care responsibilities: care directly associated with work, care outside of work without disruption to professional excellence, and pressures of self-care. The authors conclude by describing the “cruel optimism” of care that is at once rewarding but simultaneously diminishing to personal flourishing. This article contributes to analytical efforts to critically redefine care in higher education as an ambivalent set of laborious practices steeped in inequities.
Article
While power is central to the study of global politics, pedagogy is often under-recognised as a central site of power within the discipline, shaping not only what is studied but who is invited into this scholarly endeavour. We advocate for subversive pedagogies that challenge the status quo by troubling the ‘knowledge-transmission’ model of education that sees learners as passive recipients of knowledge imparted by subject experts. We articulate three key dispositions in our pedagogical practices that allow us to acknowledge how existing power relations structure our teaching and provide alternative frames for learning with our students: slowness, relationality and care. First, we identify the challenges we face working in ‘the academy at speed’, advocating a slower approach to our pedagogical practice. Second, we articulate the central features of relationality and care that can accompany a slower pedagogy, offering new possibilities for how we engage our subject and our students. We finish by tracing these elements of subversive pedagogies across the contributions to this special issue, noting how intentional subversion and attentiveness to time, relationality and care centres the power inherent in pedagogy.
Article
Full-text available
Responsible consumption, often used interchangeably with sustainable consumption, is a way of consumption that considers the economic, social, and environmental effects of the goods or services being consumed. Ensuring sustainable consumption and production patterns is one of the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) published by the United Nations (2023) The research aims to comprehend the awareness, practice, and scope of responsible consumption behaviour among women in India. It also serves as a means to highlight the necessity for further researches on Indian women’s approach towards responsible consumption, attributing to India’s abundance in resources as well as population, with women being an influential segment of the Indian society. The research analyses primary data obtained from an online survey (n = 102) and online focus group interview (n = 4) with women consumers. The online survey checks the respondents’ views through a series of Likert scale- based situational questions, while the focus group interview attempts to employ a more communicative and open-ended approach towards decoding Indian women’s awareness and practice of responsible consumer behaviour. Diagnostic analysis of the obtained qualitative data has been performed. Although application of convenience sampling method for the selection of the sample ensures exhaustiveness and authenticity in the responses, lack of diversity in the sample might diminish the generalizability of the inferences. Furthermore, the respondents’ self-reported data might lack reliability, as it could be influenced by social desirability bias or inaccurate self-perceptions. Lack of statistical analysis tools for qualitative studies like this one makes the implementation of their results quite subjective and therefore, more complex. However, this report presents a thorough descriptive interpretation of the research and serves as a starting point for further researches in this domain, with emphasis on women consumers.
Chapter
Full-text available
In this chapter, we explore the challenges faced by female parent academics in higher education institutions where capitalist neoliberal policies make it difficult for female academics to balance their work and parenting responsibilities and draw some conclusions about how care and compassion can be used to address the challenges faced by female academics.
Article
Full-text available
The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in school closures and distancing requirements that have disrupted both work and family life for many. Concerns exist that these disruptions caused by the pandemic may not have influenced men and women researchers equally. Many medical journals have published papers on the pandemic, which were generated by researchers facing the challenges of these disruptions. Here we report the results of an analysis that compared the gender distribution of authors on 1893 medical papers related to the pandemic with that on papers published in the same journals in 2019, for papers with first authors and last authors from the United States. Using mixed-effects regression models, we estimated that the proportion of COVID-19 papers with a woman first author was 19% lower than that for papers published in the same journals in 2019, while our comparisons for last authors and overall proportion of women authors per paper were inconclusive. A closer examination suggested that women’s representation as first authors of COVID-19 research was particularly low for papers published in March and April 2020. Our findings are consistent with the idea that the research productivity of women, especially early-career women, has been affected more than the research productivity of men.
Article
Full-text available
Many working mothers in the US say that they feel guilty about their inability to live up to cultural ideals of the “good mother” embedded in intensive mothering discourse. Intensive mothering is reflected in and exacerbated by the country’s work-family policies. The United States is an outlier among Western welfare states for its lack of policy supports for families, assuming that childrearing is a private responsibility even though most mothers work outside the home today. So how do working mothers outside of the US experience maternal guilt? Does a more family-friendly policy environment mitigate these feelings of guilt? Using detailed accounts of four women drawn from a larger interview study of 109 working mothers in Sweden, Germany, Italy, and the United States, I demonstrate how policy context does—and does not—make a difference in the experience of maternal guilt. A feeling of guilt helped to define “good mothers” across all four contexts. However, I found that public policy has a role to play in reducing maternal guilt in three specific ways: (1) by giving mothers more time outside of work, (2) encouraging fathers to complete more unpaid care work, and (3) distributing the responsibility and costs of childrearing more broadly.
Article
Full-text available
Academic capitalism is an outcome of the interplay between neoliberalism, globalisation, markets and universities. Universities have embraced the commercialisation of knowledge, technology transfer and research funding as well as introducing performance and audit practices. Academic capitalism has become internalised as a regulatory mechanism by academics who attempt to accumulate academic capital. Universities are traditionally gendered organisations, reflecting the societal gender order. Despite fears regarding the feminisation of the academy, the embrace of academic capitalism is contributing to its re-masculinisation and exercises an incidental gender effect. Practicing is the means by which the gender order is constituted at work. Three practices in which academics engage are examined as exemplars of the way academics increase their academic capital stock in Science, Technology, Engineering and Maths (STEM) faculties in four European universities, in Bulgaria, Denmark, Ireland and Turkey. These practices tend to be more achievable and likely to be engaged in by men, thus, career practices are the mechanism through which the gender effect of academic capitalism is achieved, academic capitalism perpetuated and the gender order maintained in STEM in academia.
Article
School and daycare closures due to the COVID‐19 pandemic have increased caregiving responsibilities for working parents. As a result, many have changed their work hours to meet these growing demands. In this study, we use panel data from the U.S. Current Population Survey to examine changes in mothers’ and fathers’ work hours from February through April, 2020, the period of time prior to the widespread COVID‐19 outbreak in the U.S. and through its first peak. Using person‐level fixed effects models, we find that mothers with young children have reduced their work hours four to five times more than fathers. Consequently, the gender gap in work hours has grown by 20 to 50 percent. These findings indicate yet another negative consequence of the COVID‐19 pandemic, highlighting the challenges it poses to women's work hours and employment.
Article
Based on data that tracks curriculum vitae (CV) and publication records as well as survey information from sociologists in German academia, we examine the effects of parenthood on the publication output of male and female academics that were present in German universities or research institutes in the year 2013. Results indicate that having children leads to a significant decline in the number of publications by women on average, while not affecting the number of publications by men. However, the gendered effect of children on productivity hardly mitigates differences in publication output between men and women, as women still publish about 20 per cent less than men after controlling for the adverse effects of children on productivity. The gendered effect of childbearing depends partly on prior levels of women’s academic achievements, suggesting a mechanism of performance-driven self-selection. Lower-performing women tend to suffer a stronger motherhood penalty than better performing women, while the publication output of successful women (who have been granted academic awards) is not reduced through childbirth. The results indicate that women are better at managing the ‘double burden’ of kids and career if external, award-giving committees have bestowed prestige upon them or indicated their potential for a scientific career.
Article
The purpose of this article is to advance a new understanding of gender as a routine accomplishment embedded in everyday interaction. To do so entails a critical assessment of existing perspectives on sex and gender and the introduction of important distinctions among sex, sex category, and gender. We argue that recognition of the analytical independence of these concepts is essential for understanding the interactional work involved in being a gendered person in society. The thrust of our remarks is toward theoretical reconceptualization, but we consider fruitful directions for empirical research that are indicated by our formulation.