ArticlePDF Available

Antiviral Activity of Ivermectin Against SARS-CoV-2: An Old-Fashioned Dog with a New Trick - A Literature Review

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is a major global threat. With no effective antiviral drugs, the repurposing of many currently available drugs has been considered. One such drug is ivermectin, an FDA-approved antiparasitic agent that has been shown to exhibit antiviral activity against a broad range of viruses. Recent studies have suggested that ivermectin inhibits the replication of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), thus suggesting its potential for use against COVID-19. This review has summarized the evidence derived from docking and modeling analysis, in vitro and in vivo studies, and results from new investigational drug protocols, as well as clinical trials, if available, which will be effective in supporting the prospective use of ivermectin as an alternative treatment for COVID-19.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Scientia
Pharmaceutica
Review
Antiviral Activity of Ivermectin Against SARS-CoV-2:
An Old-Fashioned Dog with a New Trick—
A Literature Review
Mudatsir Mudatsir 1,2,3,* , Amanda Yufika 2,4 , Firzan Nainu 5, Andri Frediansyah 6,7 ,
Dewi Megawati 8,9, Agung Pranata 2, 3, 10 , Wilda Mahdani 1,2,3, Ichsan Ichsan 1,2,3,
Kuldeep Dhama 11 and Harapan Harapan 1,2,3,*
1Department of Microbiology, School of Medicine, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh, Aceh 2311,
Indonesia; wildamahdani@unsyiah.ac.id (W.M.); ichsan@unsyiah.ac.id (I.I.)
2Medical Research Unit, School of Medicine, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh, Aceh 23111, Indonesia;
amandayufika@gmail.com (A.Y.); agungp11@unsyiah.ac.id (A.P.)
3Tropical Disease Centre, School of Medicine, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh, Aceh 23111, Indonesia
4Department of Family Medicine, School of Medicine, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh,
Aceh 23111, Indonesia
5Faculty of Pharmacy, Hasanuddin University, Makassar 90245, Indonesia; firzannainu@unhas.ac.id
6Research Division for Natural Product Technology (BPTBA), Indonesian Institute of Sciences (LIPI),
Wonosari 55861, Indonesia; andri.frediansyah@lipi.go.id
7Department of Pharmaceutical Biology, Pharmaceutical Institute, University of Tübingen,
72076 Tübingen, Germany
8Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences,
Warmadewa University, Denpasar 80239, Indonesia; amegawati@ucdavis.edu
9
Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, School of Medicine, University of California, Davis,
California, CA 95616, USA
10
Department of Parasitology, School of Medicine, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh, Aceh 23111, Indonesia
11
Division of Pathology, ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh 243122,
India; kdhama@redimail.com
*Correspondence: mudatsir@unsyiah.ac.id (M.M.); harapan@unsyiah.ac.id (H.H.)
Received: 20 July 2020; Accepted: 10 August 2020; Published: 17 August 2020


Abstract:
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is a major global threat. With no
eective antiviral drugs, the repurposing of many currently available drugs has been considered.
One such drug is ivermectin, an FDA-approved antiparasitic agent that has been shown to
exhibit antiviral activity against a broad range of viruses. Recent studies have suggested that
ivermectin inhibits the replication of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2),
thus suggesting its potential for use against COVID-19. This review has summarized the evidence
derived from docking and modeling analysis,
in vitro
and
in vivo
studies, and results from new
investigational drug protocols, as well as clinical trials, if available, which will be eective in
supporting the prospective use of ivermectin as an alternative treatment for COVID-19.
Keywords: SARS-CoV-2; COVID-19; ivermectin; treatment; antiviral
1. Introduction
In December 2019, the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by severe acute
respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), emerged in central China [
1
,
2
]. As of 30 July 2020,
more than 16 million confirmed cases and more than 600,000 deaths have been reported in 188 countries
based on the COVID-19 Dashboard database [
3
]. Most SARS-CoV-2 infections are asymptomatic or
Sci. Pharm. 2020,88, 36; doi:10.3390/scipharm88030036 www.mdpi.com/journal/scipharm
Sci. Pharm. 2020,88, 36 2 of 8
result in mild symptoms, such as cough, fatigue, and myalgia [
4
]; however, up to 20.3% of hospitalized
patients require admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) [
5
]. The data suggest that dysregulation of
the host immune response contributes to disease progression and severity [6].
COVID-19 is a global threat to public health and no eective vaccines or pharmaceutical agents
against SARS-CoV-2 are available [
1
,
4
]. To respond to the pandemic, a long list of potential drugs has
been proposed as potential treatments for COVID-19; some of these have been selected for clinical trials
in many countries [
7
,
8
]. In accordance with the concept of drug repurposing, these prospective drugs,
which are either already marketed as antivirals or have been chosen from dierent pharmacological
classes, have been suggested to provide antiviral activity against SARS-CoV-2 infection and/or to
improve the pathological symptoms of COVID-19 [
7
,
8
]. The drugs span from current antivirals
to antiparasitic agents, such as protease inhibitors [
9
12
], nucleoside analogs [
13
,
14
], chloroquine,
and hydroxychloroquine [1417].
Among the drugs repurposed for COVID-19 is ivermectin, an FDA-approved antiparasitic agent
with antiviral activity against a broad range of viruses, such as influenza [
18
], human immunodeficiency
virus (HIV) [
19
], dengue virus [
20
], West Nile virus [
21
], and Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus [
22
].
An initial
in vitro
study suggested that ivermectin could inhibit SARS-CoV-2 [
23
]. In this review,
we have summarized the evidence from docking and modeling studies,
in vitro
and
in vivo
studies,
new investigational drug protocols, and, where available, clinical trials; from this evidence, we aim to
evaluate the potency of ivermectin for use as a treatment option for COVID-19.
2. Materials and Methods
We searched for relevant articles on PubMed and Google Scholar using the search terms
“coronavirus”, OR “SARS-CoV”, OR “MERS-CoV”, OR “SARS-CoV-2” AND “ivermectin” in the title
or abstract. Available clinical trials assessing the ecacy of ivermectin were searched for on the
ClinicalTrials.gov database. Available publications were discussed based on the study types (
in vitro
,
in vivo
, emergency use in hospitals, and clinical trials). All available articles until 10 May 2020were
considerate eligible. All studies were discussed narratively. To build our discussion, previous studies
assessing the antiviral eect of ivermectin against other viruses and its action mechanisms were also
searched and discussed.
3. Ivermectin: An Introduction
Ivermectin is an antiparasitic agent with broad spectrum activity, high efficacy, and a wide safety
margin. It has been in common use in veterinary medicine since 1981 for the treatment of onchocerciasis
and filariasis [
24
]. Ivermectin was first used in humans in 1987 for the treatment of onchocerciasis;
currently, it is approved in many countries for the treatment of onchocerciasis, filariasis, strongyloidiasis,
and scabies [
25
]. Over the past three decades, approximately 3.7 billion doses of ivermectin have been
distributed worldwide through mass drug administration (MDA) campaigns [26].
Ivermectin isavailable in multiple forms, including tablets, capsules, and an oral solution; however, it is
only approved for administration via the oral route for humans. Studies of the metabolism of ivermectin
in humans are limited; however, it was suggested that the drug is extensively metabolized in the liver [
25
].
The elimination half-life of ivermectin is approximately 24 h, although a previous study suggested that the
drug persisted for several months after a single dose of ivermectin [
27
]. Ivermectin is distributed widely
throughout the body, owing to its high lipid solubility, and binds strongly to plasma proteins, particularly
serum albumin, and is notably excreted in feces [25].
A previous study suggested an antagonistic eect of ivermectin on vitamin K after hematomatous
swellings were reported in two out of 28 ivermectin-treated patients, along with a significantly increased
prothrombin time of between 1 week and 1 month after drug administration [
28
]. Notably, even though
the reduction of factor II and factor VII levels was reported to occur in most of the patients, bleeding
complications were not observed in any patients [28].
Sci. Pharm. 2020,88, 36 3 of 8
Despite being approved as an antiparasitic agent, ivermectin has also been shown to exert antiviral
activity against a broad range of viruses
in vitro
. It was suggested that ivermectin inhibited the
action of the integrase of HIV [
19
] and non-structural protein 5, a polymerase, in dengue virus [
20
].
In addition, ivermectin exerted inhibitory activities against several RNA viruses, such as West Nile
virus [
21
], Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus (VEEV) [
22
], and influenza [
18
]. This antiviral eect
was not only demonstrated against RNA viruses, but was also shown to be eective against a DNA
virus, pseudorabies virus (PRV), both in vitro and in vivo [29].
Ivermectin binds importin (IMP)
α
armadillo (ARM) repeat domain, which causes IMP
α
thermal
instability and
α
-helicity that prevents IMP
α
-IMP
β
1 interaction [
30
]. Ivermectin is also able to dissociate
the IMP
α
/
β
1 heterodimer, which further inhibits NS5-IMP
α
interaction within cells [
30
]. A significant
increase in the ratio of free IMP
α
to IMP
α
/
β
1 was observed when the IMP
α
/
β
1 heterodimer was
incubated with 12.5
µ
M ivermectin, suggesting that ivermectin binds IMP
α
directly to impact the IMP
α
structure, most likely within the ARM repeat domain [
30
]. In short, ivermectin aects the IMP
α
/
β
1
recognition of viral and other proteins by preventing its formation or dissociating the heterodimer,
which is crucial in the nuclear transport of viral proteins. As the replication cycle of the virus and
the inhibition of the host’s antiviral response occur in a manner dependent on the nuclear transport
of viral proteins, targeting the transport process may be a feasible pharmacological approach for
dealing with RNA viral infections [
21
,
30
,
31
]. In PRV, ivermectin inhibited viral entrance into the
cell nucleus,
as well as
viral proliferation, in a dose-dependent manner [
29
]. The drug significantly
reduced viral DNA synthesis, inhibited virus production, and blocked DNA polymerase accessory
subunit UL42 entrance into the nucleus by targeting the nuclear localization signal in the transfected
cells [
29
]. Moreover, the administration of ivermectin increased the survival rates of Ross River virus
(RRV)-infected mice, most likely by relieving the infection of the infected host [
29
]. The broad-spectrum
antiviral activity of ivermectin is believed to be due to its nuclear inhibitory activity [31,32].
4. Ivermectin and SARS-CoV-2 Infection
There are no antiviral drugs available to treat SARS-CoV-2 infection. However, several clinical
trials are in progress to explore the potential antiviral activities of some drugs. Although most of these
drugs were initially designed for other pathogens, they appear to have the potential to treat COVID-19,
either by acting directly on the virus or modulating the human immune system [
30
]. One of the drugs
with the potential for COVID-19 treatment is ivermectin. This antiparasitic drug has shown potential
antiviral activity by inhibiting the nuclear transport of viral proteins [1822].
Previous studies on SARS-CoV proteins have shown the potential role of IMP
α
/
β
1 during infection
in the signal-dependent nucleocytoplasmic shuttling of the SARS-CoV nucleocapsid protein, which may
aect host cell division [
21
,
33
]. Moreover, open reading frame (ORF) 6, as the accessory protein of
SARS-CoV, has been shown to have an antagonistic eect against the antiviral activity of the STAT1
transcription factor [
34
]. As ivermectin has shown a potential inhibitory eect on nuclear transport,
particularly by preventing IMPα/β1 binding, it may also act on SARS-CoV-2. As SARS-CoV-2 is very
similar to SARS-CoV, it is suggested that ivermectin may also be eective against SARS-CoV-2 by
inhibiting its nuclear transport [
25
]. A proposed schematic figure of the antiviral action of ivermectin
against SARS-CoV 2 is depicted in Figure 1.
Sci. Pharm. 2020,88, 36 4 of 8
Sci. Pharm. 2020, 88, x FOR PEER REVIEW 4 of 8
Figure 1. Ivermectin inhibits SARS-CoV-2 protein transport to the nucleus.
4.1. In Vitro and In Vivo Studies
An in vitro study demonstrated that a single dose of ivermectin was able to limit SARS-CoV-2
replication within 24–48 h, very likely through the inhibition of the IMPαβ1-mediated nuclear import
of viral proteins [23]. In that study, the levels of viral RNA released from the infected cells and cell-
associated viral RNA were significantly reduced by more than 90% and 99%, respectively, at 24 h
post infection. Furthermore, the treatment of SARS-CoV-2-infected cells with ivermectin for 48 h was
shown to result in a dramatic reduction of viral RNA (by ~5000-fold) compared with the control
group. However, no further reduction in viral RNA was observed at 72 h [23]. Lastly, the study
suggested that no toxicity of ivermectin was observed in either group at any time point, which agreed
with previous studies [19,20,22]. There was no clear explanation of how ivermectin achieved its
antiviral properties against SARS-CoV-2, but it was believed to function in same way as it did against
other viruses.
SARS-CoV-2 protein is translocated into the nucleus through the nuclear pore complex (NPC)
via binding to the importin-α (IMP-α) and importin-β (IMP-β) heterodimer. Once in the nucleus, the
SARS-CoV-2 protein is released by the importin-α/β complex. The SARS-CoV-2 protein then
promotes host shut-off, which results in the reduction of the host immune response, thereby allowing
the virus to replicate. Ivermectin inhibits SARS-CoV-2 protein translocation into the nucleus by
binding to the importin-/β complex and destabilizing the importin-/β heterodimer. The ivermectin
treatment most likely promotes host immune responses to occur in an efficient manner.
There has been increased public interest in ivermectin after the study showed the effect of the
drug on SARS-CoV-2 in vitro. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) even responded to this
study by issuing an official letter to emphasize that research was still at the very early stage and to
highlight the need to conduct further phases of clinical trials to determine if ivermectin is effective in
the treatment of COVID-19. This is important, as the study may lead to the high-risk practice of self-
medication by consumers [35]. Regardless of the controversy, this study is an important milestone
for further research on the effect of ivermectin on SARS-CoV-2 infection.
4.2. Results from Patients
The drug combination of ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine was proposed as a combination
therapy for the prophylaxis or treatment of COVID-19. This combination may produce a synergistic
Figure 1. Ivermectin inhibits SARS-CoV-2 protein transport to the nucleus.
4.1. In Vitro and In Vivo Studies
An
in vitro
study demonstrated that a single dose of ivermectin was able to limit SARS-CoV-2
replication within 24–48 h, very likely through the inhibition of the IMP
αβ
1-mediated nuclear import
of viral proteins [
23
]. In that study, the levels of viral RNA released from the infected cells and
cell-associated viral RNA were significantly reduced by more than 90% and 99%, respectively, at 24 h
post infection. Furthermore, the treatment of SARS-CoV-2-infected cells with ivermectin for 48 h was
shown to result in a dramatic reduction of viral RNA (by ~5000-fold) compared with the control group.
However, no further reduction in viral RNA was observed at 72 h [
23
]. Lastly, the study suggested that
no toxicity of ivermectin was observed in either group at any time point, which agreed with previous
studies [
19
,
20
,
22
]. There was no clear explanation of how ivermectin achieved its antiviral properties
against SARS-CoV-2, but it was believed to function in same way as it did against other viruses.
SARS-CoV-2 protein is translocated into the nucleus through the nuclear pore complex (NPC)
via binding to the importin-
α
(IMP-
α
) and importin-
β
(IMP-
β
) heterodimer. Once in the nucleus,
the SARS-CoV-2 protein is released by the importin-
α
/
β
complex. The SARS-CoV-2 protein then
promotes host shut-o, which results in the reduction of the host immune response, thereby allowing
the virus to replicate. Ivermectin inhibits SARS-CoV-2 protein translocation into the nucleus by binding
to the importin-
α
/
β
complex and destabilizing the importin-
α
/
β
heterodimer. The ivermectin treatment
most likely promotes host immune responses to occur in an ecient manner.
There has been increased public interest in ivermectin after the study showed the eect of the drug
on SARS-CoV-2
in vitro
. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) even responded to this study by
issuing an ocial letter to emphasize that research was still at the very early stage and to highlight the
need to conduct further phases of clinical trials to determine if ivermectin is eective in the treatment
of COVID-19. This is important, as the study may lead to the high-risk practice of self-medication by
consumers [
35
]. Regardless of the controversy, this study is an important milestone for further research
on the eect of ivermectin on SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Sci. Pharm. 2020,88, 36 5 of 8
4.2. Results from Patients
The drug combination of ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine was proposed as a combination therapy
for the prophylaxis or treatment of COVID-19. This combination may produce a synergistic effect with the
inhibition of both viral entry and viral replication [
36
]. However, pharmacokinetic analysis indicated that
a higher dosage was required to replicate the antiviral activity. Therefore, the recommended inhibitory
concentration is very difficult to reach in humans [
37
]. In addition, although hydroxychloroquine has
been approved by the FDA as an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) against COVID-19, its efficacy is
questioned [
38
] and its usage against SARS-CoV-2 is still highly controversial [
39
,
40
]. Further randomized
clinical controlled studies are required to come to a conclusion about the efficacy of ivermectin in patients
with SARS-CoV-2.
4.3. Ongoing Clinical Trials
Several clinical trials are ongoing in various countries, including India, the USA, Egypt, and Iraq,
to assess the ecacy of ivermectin for COVID-19. The list of the current ongoing clinical trials is
presented in Table 1. The results of these clinical trials will provide robust information on the ecacy
of ivermectin for COVID-19 treatment.
Table 1. A list of ongoing registered clinical trials of ivermectin to treat COVID-19.
Identifier
Number Title Expected
Participants
Length of
Treatment Ivermectin Dose Location
NCT04373824
Max ivermectin-COVID 19
study versus standard of
care treatment for COVID
19 cases. A pilot study
50 2 days 200–400 µg per kg body weight +
standard treatment India
NCT04374279
Trial to promote recovery
from COVID-19 with
ivermectin or endocrine
therapy
60
3 days (with
possible extension
up to 6 days)
600
µ
g/kg (up to a maximum dose
of 60 mg) USA
NCT04360356
Ivermectin and
nitazoxanide combination
therapy for COVID-19
100 6 days
200 µg/kg once orally on empty
stomach plus nitazoxanide 500
mg twice daily orally with meal
Egypt
NCT04343092
Ivermectin adjuvant to
hydroxychloroquine and
azithromycin in COVID19
patients
50 No information
12 mg/week +hydroxychloroquine
400 mg/day +azithromycin 500
mg daily
Iraq
NCT04351347
The ecacy of ivermectin
and nitazoxanide in
COVID-19 treatment
60 No information Combined with chloroquine (no
information about dose) Egypt
NCT04374019
Novel agents for treatment
of high-risk COVID-19
positive patients
240
2 days for
ivermectin +14
days for
hydroxychloroquine
First 2 days: Weight <75 kg: four
tablets (12 mg total daily dose).
Days 1–2: Weight >75 kg: five
tablets (15 mg total daily dose) in
combination with
hydroxychloroquine. Days 1–14:
three tablets (600 mg total daily
dose)
USA
NCT04345419
A real-life experience on
treatment of patients with
COVID 19
120 No information As a single dose (no information) Egypt
5. Conclusions
Ivermectin is an antiparasitic drug with potential use as a broad-spectrum antimicrobial agent for
the treatment of viral infections. Initial evidence indicated that ivermectin, an importin
α
/
β
1-mediated
nuclear import inhibitor, inhibited SARS-CoV-2
in vitro
. In a small clinical study, the administration of
ivermectin (150
µ
g/kg) in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 was associated with a lower mortality
rate and a shorter hospital stay. Several randomized controlled trials are ongoing to investigate the
ecacy of ivermectin against COVID-19. In addition to ivermectin, several drugs either currently
classified as an antiviral or alternative class of drug, have been the subject of clinical trials as a part
Sci. Pharm. 2020,88, 36 6 of 8
of the drug repurposing eort in the fight against COVID-19. The results of these clinical trials are
required to confirm the ecacy of these drugs for the treatment of patients with COVID-19.
Author Contributions:
Conceptualization, H.H.; validation, M.M., A.Y., F.N., A.F., D.M., A.P., W.M., I.I., K.D.,
and H.H.; writing—original draft preparation, M.M., A.Y., F.N., D.M., and H.H.; writing—review and editing,
M.M., A.Y., F.N., A.F., D.M., A.P., W.M., I.I., K.D., and H.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published
version of the manuscript.
Funding: This research received no external funding.
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
1.
Malik, Y.S.; Kumar, N.; Sircar, S.; Kaushik, R.; Bhatt, S.; Dhama, K.; Gupta, P.; Goyal, K.; Singh, M.P.;
Ghoshal, U.; et al. Pandemic Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19): Challenges and A Global Perspective.
Preprints 2020,9, 519. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
2.
Chatterjee, P.; Nagi, N.; Agarwal, A.; Das, B.; Banerjee, S.; Sarkar, S.; Gupta, N.; Gangakhedkar, R.R. The 2019
novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic: A review of the current evidence. Indian J. Med. Res.
2020
,
154, 147. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
3.
Dong, E.; Du, H.; Gardner, L. An interactive web-based dashboard to track COVID-19 in real time.
Lancet Infect. Dis. 2020,20, 533–534. [CrossRef]
4.
Harapan, H.; Itoh, N.; Yufika, A.; Winardi, W.; Keamg, S.; Te, H.; Megawati, D.; Hayati, Z.; Wagner, A.;
Mudatsir, M. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): A literature review. J. Infect. Public Health
2020
,13,
667–673. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
5.
Rodriguez-Morales, A.J.; Cardona-Ospina, J.A.; Gutierrez-Ocampo, E.; Villamizar-Pena, R.; Holguin-Rivera, Y.;
Escalera-Antezana, J.P.; Alvarado-Arnez, L.E.; Bonilla-Aldana, D.K.; Franco-Paredes, C.; Henao-Martinez, A.F.;
et al. Clinical, laboratory and imaging features of COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Travel Med.
Infect. Dis. 2020,34, 101623. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
6.
Keam, S.; Megawati, D.; Patel, S.; Tiwari, R.; Dhama, K.; Harapan, H. Immunopathology and immunotherapeutic
strategies in SARS-CoV-2 infection. Rev. Med. Virol. 2020. [CrossRef]
7.
Xia, S.; Liu, M.; Wang, C.; Xu, W.; Lan, Q.; Feng, S.; Qi, F.; Bao, L.; Du, L.; Liu, S.; et al. Inhibition of
SARS-CoV-2 (previously 2019-nCoV) infection by a highly potent pan-coronavirus fusion inhibitor targeting
its spike protein that harbors a high capacity to mediate membrane fusion. Cell Res.
2020
,30, 343–355.
[CrossRef]
8.
Sanders, J.M.; Monogue, M.L.; Jodlowski, T.Z.; Cutrell, J.B. Pharmacologic Treatments for Coronavirus
Disease 2019 (COVID-19): A Review. JAMA 2020,323, 1824–1836. [CrossRef]
9.
Wang, J. Fast Identification of Possible Drug Treatment of Coronavirus Disease -19 (COVID-19) Through
Computational Drug Repurposing Study. J. Chem. Inf. Model 2020,60, 3277–3286. [CrossRef]
10.
Liu, X.; Wang, X.-J. Potential inhibitors against 2019-nCoV coronavirus M protease from clinically approved
medicines. J. Genet. Genom. 2020,47, 119–121. [CrossRef]
11.
Fintelman-Rodrigues, N.; Sacramento, C.Q.; Lima, C.R.; da Silva, F.S.; Ferreira, A.; Mattos, M.; de Freitas, C.S.;
Soares, V.C.; Dias, S.D.S.G.; Temerozo, J.R. Atazanavir inhibits SARS-CoV-2 replication and pro-inflammatory
cytokine production. BioRxiv 2020. [CrossRef]
12.
Hall, D.C., Jr.; Ji, H.F. A search for medications to treat COVID-19 via in silico molecular docking models of
the SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein and 3CL protease. Travel Med. Infect. Dis.
2020
,35, 101646. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
13.
Elfiky, A.A. Ribavirin, Remdesivir, Sofosbuvir, Galidesivir, and Tenofovir against SARS-CoV-2 RNA
dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp): A molecular docking study. Life Sci.
2020
,253, 117592. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
14.
Wang, M.; Cao, R.; Zhang, L.; Yang, X.; Liu, J.; Xu, M.; Shi, Z.; Hu, Z.; Zhong, W.; Xiao, G. Remdesivir and
chloroquine eectively inhibit the recently emerged novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) in vitro. Cell Res. 2020,
30, 269–271. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Sci. Pharm. 2020,88, 36 7 of 8
15.
Liu, J.; Cao, R.; Xu, M.; Wang, X.; Zhang, H.; Hu, H.; Li, Y.; Hu, Z.; Zhong, W.; Wang, M. Hydroxychloroquine,
a less toxic derivative of chloroquine, is eective in inhibiting SARS-CoV-2 infection
in vitro
.Cell Dis.
2020
,
6, 16. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
16.
Gao, J.; Tian, Z.; Yang, X. Breakthrough: Chloroquine phosphate has shown apparent ecacy in treatment of
COVID-19 associated pneumonia in clinical studies. Bioscience Trends 2020,14, 72–73. [CrossRef]
17.
Colson, P.; Rolain, J.-M.; Raoult, D. Chloroquine for the 2019 novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2. Int. J. Antimicrob.
Agents 2020,55, 105923. [CrossRef]
18.
Gotz, V.; Magar, L.; Dornfeld, D.; Giese, S.; Pohlmann, A.; Höper, D.; Kong, B.W.; Jans, D.A.; Beer, M.;
Haller, O.; et al. Influenza A viruses escape from MxA restriction at the expense of ecient nuclear vRNP
import. Sci. Rep. 2016,6, 1–15.
19.
Wagsta, K.; Sivakumaran, H.; Heaton, S.; Harrich, D.; Jans, D. Ivermectin is a specific inhibitor of importin
α
/
β
-mediated nuclear import able to inhibit replication of HIV-1 and dengue virus. Biochem. J.
2012
,443,
851–856. [CrossRef]
20.
Tay, M.Y.F.; Fraser, J.E.; Chan, W.K.K.; Moreland, N.J.; Rathore, A.P.; Wang, C.; Vasudevan, S.G.; Jans, D.A.
Nuclear localization of dengue virus (DENV) 1–4 non-structural protein 5; protection against all 4 DENV
serotypes by the inhibitor Ivermectin. Antivir. Res. 2013,99, 301–306. [CrossRef]
21.
Yang, S.N.Y.; Atkinson, S.C.; Wang, C.; Lee, A.; Bogoyevitch, M.A.; Borg, N.A.; Jans, D.A. The broad spectrum
antiviral ivermectin targets the host nuclear transport importin
α
/
β
1 heterodimer. Antivir. Res.
2020
,177, 104760.
[CrossRef]
22.
Lundberg, L.; Pinkham, C.; Baer, A.; Amaya, M.; Narayanan, A.; Wagsta, K.M.; Jans, D.A.; Kehn-Hall, K.
Nuclear import and export inhibitors alter capsid protein distribution in mammalian cells and reduce
Venezuelan Equine Encephalitis Virus replication. Antivir. Res. 2013,100, 662–672. [CrossRef]
23.
Caly, L.; Druce, J.D.; Catton, M.G.; Jans, D.A.; Wagsta, K.M. The FDA-approved drug ivermectin inhibits
the replication of SARS-CoV-2 in vitro. Antivir. Res. 2020,178, 104787. [CrossRef]
24.
Fisher, M.H.; Mrozik, H. Ivermectin and abamectin. In Chemistry; Campbell, W.C., Ed.; Springer: New York,
NY, USA, 1989; pp. 1–23.
25.
Gonz
á
lez-Canga, A.; Sahag
ú
n-Prieto, A.M.; Diez-Li
é
bana, M.J.; Mart
í
nez, N.F.; Vega, M.S.; Vieitez, J.J.G.
The pharmacokineticks and interactions of ivermectin in humans—A mini review. AAPS J.
2008
,10, 42–46.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
26.
Nicolas, P.; Maia, M.F.; Bassat, Q.; Kobylinski, K.C.; Monteiro, W.; Rabinovch, N.R.; Men
é
ndez, C.;
Bardaj
í
, A.; Chaccour, C. Safety of oral ivermectin during pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Lancet Glob Health 2020,8, e92–e100. [CrossRef]
27.
Edwards, G.; Dingsdale, A.; Helsby, N.; Orme, M.L.; Breckenridge, A. The relative systematic availability of
ivermectin after administration as capsule, tablet, and oral solution. Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol.
1988
,35, 681–684.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
28.
Whitworth, J.A.; Hay, C.R.; McNicholas, A.M.; Morgan, D.; Maude, G.H.; Taylor, D.W. Coagulation
abnormalities and ivermectin. Ann. Trop. Med. Parasitol. 1992,86, 301–305. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
29.
Lv, C.; Liu, W.; Wang, B.; Dang, R.; Qiu, L.; Ren, J.; Yan, C.; Yang, Z.; Wang, X. Ivermectin inhibits DNA
polymerase UL42 of pseudorabies virus entrance into the nucleus and proliferation of the virus
in vitro
and
vivo. Antivir. Res. 2018,159, 55–62. [CrossRef]
30.
Tu, Y.F.; Chien, C.S.; Yarmishyn, A.A.; Lin, Y.Y.; Luo, Y.H.; Lin, Y.T.; Lai, W.Y.; Yang, D.M.; Chou, S.J.; Yang, Y.P.
A review os SARS-CoV-2 and the ongoing clinical trials. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020,21, 2657. [CrossRef]
31.
Caly, L.; Wagsta, K.M.; Jans, D.A. Nuclear tracking of proteins from RNA viruses: Potential target for
antivirals? Antivir. Res. 2012,95, 202–206. [CrossRef]
32.
Jans, D.A.; Martin, A.J.; Wagsta, K.M. Inhibitors of nuclear transport. Curr. Opin.
2019
,58, 50–60. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
33.
Timani, K.A.; Liao, Q.; Ye, L.; Zeng, Y.; Liu, J.; Zheng, Y.; Ye, L.; Yang, X.; Lingbao, K.; Gao, J.; et al.
Nuclear/nucleolar localization properties of C-terminal nucleocapsid protein of SARS coronavirus. Virus Res.
2005,114, 23–34. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
34.
Frieman, M.; Yount, B.; Heise, M.; Kopecky-Bromberg, S.A.; Palese, P.; Baric, R.S. Severe acute respiratory
syndrome coronavirus ORF6 antagonizes STAT1 function by sequestering nuclear import factors on the
rough endoplasmic reticulum/Golgi membrane. J. Virol. 2007,81, 9812–9824. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Sci. Pharm. 2020,88, 36 8 of 8
35.
FDA Letter to Stakeholders: Do Not Use Ivermectin Intended for Animals as Treatment for COVID-19 in
Humans. Available online: https://www.fda.gov/animal-veterinary/product-safety-information/fda-letter-
stakeholders-do-not-use-ivermectin-intended-animals-treatment-covid-19-humans (accessed on 1 June 2020).
36.
Patri, A.; Fabbrocini, G. Hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin: A synergistic combination for COVID-19
chemoprophylaxis and treatment? J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2020,82, e221. [CrossRef]
37.
Momekov, G.; Momekova, D. Ivermectin as a potential COVID-19 treatment from the pharmacokinetic point
of view. MedRxiv 2020,34, 469–474.
38.
Cavalcanti, A.B.; Zampieri, F.G.; Rosa, R.G.; Azevedo, L.C.P.; Veiga, V.C.; Avezum, A.; Damiani, L.P.;
Marcadenti, A.; Kawano-Dourado, L.; Lisboa, T. Hydroxychloroquine with or without Azithromycin in
Mild-to-Moderate Covid-19. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020. [CrossRef]
39.
Liu, Y.; Gayle, A.; Wilder-Smith, A.J.R. The reproductive number of COVID-19 is higher compared to SARS
coronavirus. J. Travel Med. 2020. [CrossRef]
40.
Frediansyah, A.; Tiwaric, R.; Sharun, K.; Dhama, K.; Harapan, H. Antivirals for COVID-19: A critical review.
Clin. Epidemiol. Glob Health 2020. (In press) [CrossRef]
©
2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access
article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution
(CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
... Moreover, several previous reports revealed antiviral activity of Ivermectin on Dengue HIV, Yellow fever, West Nile, Hendra, Newcastle, and Zika viruses (8)(9)(10) . Furthermore, several observational studies and real-world clinical practice showed that Ivermectin is effective in treating COVID-19 patients at both mildmoderate and severe phases of the disease (11)(12)(13)(14) ; accordingly, it is thought that Ivermectin might possess antiviral as well as immunomodulatory activity (12)(13)(14) . Ivermectin is most probably a host-specific antiviral drug and it acts as a specific inhibitor of importin α/βmediated nuclear import inhibiting replication of several viruses such as HIV-1, Zika and dengue viruses (10) . ...
... Moreover, several previous reports revealed antiviral activity of Ivermectin on Dengue HIV, Yellow fever, West Nile, Hendra, Newcastle, and Zika viruses (8)(9)(10) . Furthermore, several observational studies and real-world clinical practice showed that Ivermectin is effective in treating COVID-19 patients at both mildmoderate and severe phases of the disease (11)(12)(13)(14) ; accordingly, it is thought that Ivermectin might possess antiviral as well as immunomodulatory activity (12)(13)(14) . Ivermectin is most probably a host-specific antiviral drug and it acts as a specific inhibitor of importin α/βmediated nuclear import inhibiting replication of several viruses such as HIV-1, Zika and dengue viruses (10) . ...
... Accordingly, Ivermectin and Doxycycline were used in this study because both drugs have shown antiviral and immunomodulatory activities (8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15) . Moreover, Doxycycline is a broad-spectrum antibiotic, which tackles the problem of secondary bacterial infection in COVID-19 patients (16)(17)(18)(19)(20) . ...
Article
COVID-19 patients suffer from the lack of curative therapy. Hence, there is an urgent need to try repurposed old drugs on COVID-19. Randomized controlled study on 70 COVID-19 patients (48 mild-moderate, 11 severe, and 11 critical patients) treated with 200 µg/kg PO of Ivermectin per day for 2-3 days along with 100 mg PO doxycycline twice per day for 5-10 days plus standard therapy; the second arm is 70 COVID-19 patients (48 mild-moderate and 22 severe and zero critical patients) on standard therapy, which is (vitamin C, D, and zinc, azithromycin, dexamethasone and oxygen supply if needed). The time to recovery, the progression of the disease, and the mortality rate were the outcome-assessing parameters. Among all patients and among severe patients, 3/70 (4.28%) and 1/11 (9%), respectively progressed to a more advanced stage of the disease in the Ivermectin-Doxycycline group versus 7/70 (10%) and 7/22 (31.81%), respectively in the control group (P>0.05). The mortality rate was 0/48 (0%), 0/11 (0%), and 2/11 (18.2%) in mild-moderate, severe, and critical COVID-19 patients, respectively in Ivermectin-Doxycycline group versus 0/48 (0%), and 6/22 (27.27%) in mild-moderate and severe COVID-19 patients, respectively in standard therapy group (p=0.052). Moreover, the mean time to recovery was 6.34, 20.27, and 24.13 days in mild-moderate, severe, and critical COVID-19 patients, respectively in Ivermectin-Doxycycline group versus 13.66 and 24.25 days in mild-moderate and severe COVID-19 patients, respectively in standard therapy group (P<0.01). It is concluded that Ivermectin with doxycycline reduced the time to recovery, the percentage of patients progress to more advanced stage of disease, and reduced mortality rate in severe patients from 22.72% to 0%. Keywords: Ivermectin, Doxycycline, COVID-19, Coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2 Citation: Hashim HA, Maulood MF, Ali CL, Rasheed AM, Fatak DF, Kabah KK, Abdulamir AS. Controlled randomized clinical trial on using ivermectin with doxycycline for treating COVID-19 patients in Baghdad, Iraq Iraqi JMS. 2021; 19(1): 107-115. doi: 10.22578/IJMS.19.1.14
... Ivermectin has been an effective drug for the treatment of parasites as shown in Figure 14. Researchers in Australia reported that the drug blocked the coronavirus in cell cultures but used doses high enough to have dangerous side effects in humans, causing an immediate warning against the use of veterinary drugs containing ivermectin by the FDA [70][71][72]. Ivermectin was further evaluated in July 2021 in a large-scale, randomized clinical trial and provided more accurate data [72,73]. However, later clinical research showed that Ivermectin is not a potential inhibitor of SARS-CoV-2 and Kumar et.al demonstrated a cell line [71]. ...
... Ivermectin was further evaluated in July 2021 in a large-scale, randomized clinical trial and provided more accurate data [72,73]. However, later clinical research showed that Ivermectin is not a potential inhibitor of SARS-CoV-2 and Kumar et.al demonstrated a cell line [71]. The National Institutes of Health has begun testing for medicines in patients over 30 years of age who have tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 in the previous 10 days and have had at least two symptoms in the previous week [70,71]. ...
... However, later clinical research showed that Ivermectin is not a potential inhibitor of SARS-CoV-2 and Kumar et.al demonstrated a cell line [71]. The National Institutes of Health has begun testing for medicines in patients over 30 years of age who have tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 in the previous 10 days and have had at least two symptoms in the previous week [70,71]. Immediately before the start of this study, another study of 1500 patients showed no effect of ivermectin. ...
Article
Full-text available
SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome) is highly infectious and causes severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (SARD), immune suppression, and multi-organ failure. For SARS-CoV-2, only supportive treatment options are available, such as oxygen supportive therapy, ventilator support, antibiotics for secondary infections, mineral and fluid treatment, and a significant subset of repurposed effective drugs. Viral targeted inhibitors are the most suitable molecules, such as ACE2 (angiotensin-converting enzyme-2) and RBD (receptor-binding domain) protein-based inhibitors, inhibitors of host proteases, inhibitors of viral proteases 3CLpro (3C-like proteinase) and PLpro (papain-like protease), inhibitors of replicative enzymes, inhibitors of viral attachment of SARS-CoV-2 to the ACE2 receptor and TMPRSS2 (transmembrane serine proteinase 2), inhibitors of HR1 (Heptad Repeat 1)–HR2 (Heptad Repeat 2) interaction at the S2 protein of the coronavirus, etc. Targeting the cathepsin L proteinase, peptide analogues, monoclonal antibodies, and protein chimaeras as RBD inhibitors interferes with the spike protein’s ability to fuse to the membrane. Targeting the cathepsin L proteinase, peptide analogues, monoclonal antibodies, and protein chimaeras as RBD inhibitors interferes with the spike protein’s ability to fuse to the membrane. Even with the tremendous progress made, creating effective drugs remains difficult. To develop COVID-19 treatment alternatives, clinical studies are examining a variety of therapy categories, including antibodies, antivirals, cell-based therapy, repurposed diagnostic medicines, and more. In this article, we discuss recent clinical updates on SARS-CoV-2 infection, clinical characteristics, diagnosis, immunopathology, the new emergence of variant, SARS-CoV-2, various approaches to drug development and treatment options. The development of therapies has been complicated by the global occurrence of many SARS-CoV-2 mutations. Discussion of this manuscript will provide new insight into drug pathophysiology and drug development.
... Recently, researchers have found much evidence about the efficacy of ivermectin on the immune system of laboratory animals and humans, in addition to its antiparasitic effects (Blackley and Rousseaux, 1991;Mudatsir et al., 2020;Savanur et al., 1996). Blackley and Rousseaux (1991) reported the enhancement effects of ivermectin on T lymphocyte count, antibody production, and the macrophage-dependent response of the immune system in mice. ...
... Blackley and Rousseaux (1991) reported the enhancement effects of ivermectin on T lymphocyte count, antibody production, and the macrophage-dependent response of the immune system in mice. Mudatsir et al. (2020) concluded that ivermectin has antiviral properties by blocking importin alpha and beta- If the means within columns do not share the same superscripts such as "a,b,c" letters there is a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05). If the means within rows do not share the same superscript letters such as "A and B" there is a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05). ...
Article
This study aims to reveal the therapeutic effect of ivermectin against Capra hircus papillomavirus (ChPV-1) infection and on the CD4+/CD8+ (cluster of differentiation) and oxidative stress index (OSI). Twenty hair goats naturally infected with ChPV-1 were divided into two groups with equal numbers as the ivermectin group and the control groups. Ivermectin was administered subcutaneously at a dose of 0.2 mg/kg to the goats in the ivermectin group on days 0, 7, and 21. Blood samples were collected from the vena jugularis on days 0, 21, 45, and 90. The cluster of differentiation4+/CD8+ ratio was significantly higher in the ivermectin group than in the control group on the 90th day. Furthermore, the CD8+ concentration was significantly decreased in the ivermectin group on the 90th day compared with the control group. Both total oxidant status (TOS) and OSI were found to be significantly higher in the control group on the 21st and 45th days than in the ivermectin group. On the 90th day, it was determined that the lesions in the ivermectin group improved significantly compared to those in the control group. Additionally, only in the ivermectin group was there a significant difference between the 90th day and the other days in terms of healing. As a result, it can be suggested that ivermectin has positive effects on the immune response and that its oxidative actions are of therapeutic value and do not harm the systemic oxidative status, as in untreated goats.
... The article suggested that the antiviral activity is gained through the inhibition of importin (IMP)-α/β1-mediated nuclear import of viral proteins of SARS-CoV-2, resulting in the inhibition of RNA replication [25]. This was further illustrated by Mudatsir et al. as shown in Figure 2 [26]. It is important to note that the levels of IVM used that demonstrated inhibitory activity (5 µM) are not achievable in humans, as they are 100 times more than the standard dose (200 µg/kg). ...
... The article suggested that the antiviral activity is gained through the inhibition of importin (IMP)-α/β1-mediated nuclear import of viral proteins of SARS-CoV-2, resulting in the inhibition of RNA replication [25]. This was further illustrated by Mudatsir et al. as shown in Figure 2 [26]. It is important to note that the levels of IVM used that demonstrated inhibitory activity (5 μM) are not achievable in humans, as they are 100 times more than the standard dose (200 μg/kg). ...
Article
Full-text available
Due to the rapid, vast, and emerging global spread of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, many drugs were quickly repurposed in a desperate attempt to unveil a miracle drug. Ivermectin (IVM), an antiparasitic macrocyclic lactone, was tested and confirmed for its in vitro antiviral activity against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) in early 2020. Along with its potential antiviral activity, the affordability and availability of IVM resulted in a wide public interest. Across the world, trials have put IVM to test for both the treatment and prophylaxis of COVID-19, as well as its potential role in combination therapy. Additionally, the targeted delivery of IVM was studied in animals and COVID-19 patients. Through this conducted literature review, the potential value and effectiveness of the repurposed antiparasitic agent in the ongoing global emergency were summarized. The reviewed trials suggested a value of IVM as a treatment in mild COVID-19 cases, though the benefit was not extensive. On the other hand, IVM efficacy as a prophylactic agent was more evident and widely reported. In the most recent trials, novel nasal formulations of IVM were explored with the hope of an improved optimized effect.
... One study found that hospitalized patients who received ivermectin alongside other treatments (azithromycin and hydroxychloroquine) had lower mortality than those who did not receive ivermectin (Rajter et al., 2020). In one study, administration of ivermectin (150 µg/kg) to hospitalized patients with COVID-19 was associated with a lower mortality rate and shorter hospital stay [42]. ...
Preprint
Purpose: Ivermectin is a broad-spectrum antiparasitic and an effective drug to treat COVID-19. In this article, we looked at the effects of ivermectin on coronavirus and its patients in three ways. We have discussed and organized other previously discovered potential therapies and reviewed them in Table 2 and in the last section. Methods: We searched for articles on MedRxiv, PubMed, Google Scholar, MEDLINE, EMBASE uses the appropriate search terms. ClinicalTrials.gov was searched for available clinical trials evaluating the effectiveness of ivermectin. We also use EU clinical trial registry data and ANZ registry data for clinical trials. Also, we performed our methods in 4 stages: Identifying studies, Selection of Studies, Collating Studies, Reporting results. Results: Results are variable. Some studies have shown the effectiveness of ivermectin, others have not. Furthermore, some studies show that a combination of ivermectin with other drugs is useful. Conclusion: Overall, we believe the reason ivermectin is useful is that it goes back to its origin, which is soil. Our theory and hypothesis is that if the coronavirus, created by man or by nature, can generally be treated with nature, that is, the soil. The interesting thing is that today we know that ivermectin is effective in the fight against the coronavirus. In fact, other drugs like teicoplanin, cyclosporine and rapamycin that are effective against the coronavirus have come from the soil. We hope that this article has been able to take a step in finding a corona drug, InshaAllah.
... As the pandemic continues, the availability of numerous efficient and safe vaccines has provided some relief [144][145][146]. A long list of potential COVID-19 drug candidates, each with their own mechanism of action, has been proposed [7,[147][148][149]. Nevertheless, the US Food and Drug Administration has only approved two antiviral drugs for SARS-CoV-2, including remdesivir, a protease inhibitor, and baricitinib, a Janus kinase inhibitor that inhibits immune system overstimulation [150]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Citation: Frediansyah, A.; Sofyantoro, F.; Alhumaid, S.; Al Mutair, A.; Albayat, H.; Altaweil, H.I.; Al-Afghani, H.M.; AlRamadhan, A.A.; AlGhazal, M.R.; Turkistani, S.A.; et al. Microbial Natural Products with Antiviral Activities, Including Anti-SARS-CoV-2: A Review. Molecules 2022, 27, 4305.
... One study found that hospitalized patients who received ivermectin alongside other treatments (azithromycin and hydroxychloroquine) had lower mortality than those who did not receive ivermectin (Rajter et al., 2020). In one study, administration of ivermectin (150 µg/kg) to hospitalized patients with COVID-19 was associated with a lower mortality rate and shorter hospital stay [42]. ...
Preprint
Purpose: Ivermectin is a broad-spectrum antiparasitic and an effective drug to treat COVID-19. In this article, we looked at the effects of ivermectin on coronavirus and its patients in three ways. We have discussed and organized other previously discovered potential therapies and reviewed them in Table 2 and in the last section. Methods: We searched for articles on MedRxiv, PubMed, Google Scholar, MEDLINE, EMBASE uses the appropriate search terms. ClinicalTrials.gov was searched for available clinical trials evaluating the effectiveness of ivermectin. We also use EU clinical trial registry data and ANZ registry data for clinical trials. Also, we performed our methods in 4 stages: Identifying studies, Selection of Studies, Collating Studies, Reporting results. Results: Results are variable. Some studies have shown the effectiveness of ivermectin, others have not. Furthermore, some studies show that a combination of ivermectin with other drugs is useful. Conclusion: Overall, we believe the reason ivermectin is useful is that it goes back to its origin, which is soil. Our theory and hypothesis is that if the coronavirus, created by man or by nature, can generally be treated with nature, that is, the soil. The interesting thing is that today we know that ivermectin is effective in the fight against the coronavirus. In fact, other drugs like teicoplanin, cyclosporine and rapamycin that are effective against the coronavirus have come from the soil. We hope that this article has been able to take a step in finding a corona drug, InshaAllah.
... One study found that hospitalized patients who received ivermectin alongside other treatments (azithromycin and hydroxychloroquine) had lower mortality than those who did not receive ivermectin (Rajter et al., 2020). In one study, administration of ivermectin (150 µg/kg) to hospitalized patients with COVID-19 was associated with a lower mortality rate and shorter hospital stay [42]. ...
Preprint
Purpose: Ivermectin is a broad-spectrum antiparasitic and an effective drug to treat COVID-19. In this article, we looked at the effects of ivermectin on coronavirus and its patients in three ways. We have discussed and organized other previously discovered potential therapies and reviewed them in Table 2 and in the last section. Methods: We searched for articles on MedRxiv, PubMed, Google Scholar, MEDLINE, EMBASE uses the appropriate search terms. ClinicalTrials.gov was searched for available clinical trials evaluating the effectiveness of ivermectin. We also use EU clinical trial registry data and ANZ registry data for clinical trials. Also, we performed our methods in 4 stages: Identifying studies, Selection of Studies, Collating Studies, Reporting results. Results: Results are variable. Some studies have shown the effectiveness of ivermectin, others have not. Furthermore, some studies show that a combination of ivermectin with other drugs is useful. Conclusion: Overall, we believe the reason ivermectin is useful is that it goes back to its origin, which is soil. Our theory and hypothesis is that if the coronavirus, created by man or by nature, can generally be treated with nature, that is, the soil. The interesting thing is that today we know that ivermectin is effective in the fight against the coronavirus. In fact, other drugs like teicoplanin, cyclosporine and rapamycin that are effective against the coronavirus have come from the soil. We hope that this article has been able to take a step in finding a corona drug, InshaAllah.
... One study found that hospitalized patients who received ivermectin alongside other treatments (azithromycin and hydroxychloroquine) had lower mortality than those who did not receive ivermectin (Rajter et al., 2020). In one study, administration of ivermectin (150 µg/kg) to hospitalized patients with COVID-19 was associated with a lower mortality rate and shorter hospital stay [42]. ...
Preprint
Purpose: Ivermectin is a broad-spectrum antiparasitic and an effective drug to treat COVID-19. In this article, we looked at the effects of ivermectin on coronavirus and its patients in three ways. We have discussed and organized other previously discovered potential therapies and reviewed them in Table 2 and in the last section. Methods: We searched for articles on MedRxiv, PubMed, Google Scholar, MEDLINE, EMBASE uses the appropriate search terms. ClinicalTrials.gov was searched for available clinical trials evaluating the effectiveness of ivermectin. We also use EU clinical trial registry data and ANZ registry data for clinical trials. Also, we performed our methods in 4 stages: Identifying studies, Selection of Studies, Collating Studies, Reporting results.Results: Results are variable. Some studies have shown the effectiveness of ivermectin, others have not. Furthermore, some studies show that a combination of ivermectin with other drugs is useful. Conclusion: Overall, we believe the reason ivermectin is useful is that it goes back to its origin, which is soil. Our theory and hypothesis is that if the coronavirus, created by man or by nature, can generally be treated with nature, that is, the soil. The interesting thing is that today we know that ivermectin is effective in the fight against the coronavirus. In fact, other drugs like teicoplanin, cyclosporine and rapamycin that are effective against the coronavirus have come from the soil. We hope that this article has been able to take a step in finding a corona drug, InshaAllah.
Article
Full-text available
No specific drugs have been approved for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) to date as the development of antivirals usually requires time. Therefore, assessment and use of currently available antiviral drugs is critical for a timely response to the current pandemic. Here, we have reviewed anti-SARS-CoV-2 potencies of available antiviral drug groups such as fusion inhibitors, protease inhibitors, neuraminidase inhibitors, and M2 ion-channel protein blockers. Although clinical trials to assess the efficacy of these antivirals are ongoing, this review highlights important information including docking and modeling analyses, in vitro studies, as well as results from clinical uses of these antivirals against COVID-19 pandemic.
Article
Full-text available
The technology-driven world of the 21 st century is currently confronted with a major threat to humankind, represented by the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome, coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). As of now, COVID-19 has affected more than 6 million confirmed cases and took 0.39 million human lives. SARS-CoV-2 spreads much faster than its two ancestors, SARS-CoV and Middle East respiratory syndrome-CoV (MERS-CoV), but Pathogens 2020, 9, 519 2 of 31 has low fatality rates. Our analyses speculate that the efficient replication and transmission of SARS-CoV-2 might be due to the high-density basic amino acid residues, preferably positioned in close proximity at both the furin-like cleavage sites (S1/S2 and S2') within the spike protein. Given the high genomic similarities of SARS-CoV-2 to bat SARS-like CoVs, it is likely that bats serve as a reservoir host for its progenitor. Women and children are less susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 infection, while the elderly and people with comorbidities are more prone to serious clinical outcomes, which may be associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and cytokine storm. The cohesive approach amongst researchers across the globe has delivered high-end viral diagnostics. However, home-based point-of-care diagnostics are still under development, which may prove transformative in current COVID-19 pandemic containment. Similarly, vaccines and therapeutics against COVID-19 are currently in the pipeline for clinical trials. In this review, we discuss the noteworthy advancements, focusing on the etiological viral agent, comparative genomic analysis, population susceptibility, disease epidemiology and diagnosis, animal reservoirs, laboratory animal models, disease transmission, therapeutics, vaccine challenges, and disease mitigation measures.
Article
Full-text available
The broad-spectrum antiparasitic agent ivermectin has been very recently found to inhibit SARS-CoV-2 in vitro and proposed as a candidate for drug repurposing in COVID-19. In the present report the in vitro antiviral activity end-points are analyzed from the pharmacokinetic perspective. The available pharmacokinetic data from clinically relevant and excessive dosing studies indicate that the SARS-CoV-2 inhibitory concentrations are not likely to be attainable in humans.
Article
Full-text available
The outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and pandemic, caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV2), has become a major concern globally. As of April 14, 2020, more than 1.9 million COVID-19 cases have been reported in 185 countries. Some patients with COVID-19 develop severe clinical manifestations, while others show mild symptoms, suggesting that dysregulation of the host immune response contributes to disease progression and severity. In this review, we have summarized and discussed recent immunological studies focusing on the response of the host immune system and the immunopathology of SARS-CoV-2 infection as well as immunotherapeutic strategies for COVID-19. Immune evasion by SARS-CoV-2, functional exhaustion of lymphocytes, and cytokine storm have been discussed as part of immunopathology mechanism in SARS-CoV-2 infection. Some potential immunotherapeutic strategies to control the progression of COVID-19 such as passive antibody therapy and use of interferon ⍺β and IL-6 receptor (IL-6R) inhibitor, have also been discussed. This may help us to understand the immune status of patients with COVID-19, particularly those with severe clinical presentation, and form a basis for further immunotherapeutic investigations.
Preprint
Full-text available
The technology-driven world of the 21st century is currently confronted with a major threat to humankind in the form of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). As of April 22, 2020, COVID-19 has claimed 169, 006 human lives and had spread to over 200 countries with more than 2,471,136 confirmed cases. The perpetually increasing figures associated with COVID-19 are disrupting the social and economic systems globally. The losses are unmatched and significantly higher compared to those from previously encountered pathogenic infections. Previously, two CoVs (SARS-CoV and Middle East respiratory syndrome-CoV) affected the human population in 2002 and 2012 in China and Saudi Arabia, respectively. Based on genomic similarities, animal-origin CoVs, primarily those infecting bats, civet cats, and pangolins, were presumed to be the source of emerging human CoVs, including the SARS-CoV-2. The cohesive approach amongst virologists, bioinformaticians, big data analysts, epidemiologists, and public health researchers across the globe has delivered high-end viral diagnostics. Similarly, vaccines and therapeutics against COVID-19 are currently in the pipeline for clinical trials. The rapidly evolving and popular technology of artificial intelligence played a major role in confirming and countering the COVID-19 pandemic using digital technologies and mathematical algorithms. In this review, we discuss the noteworthy advancements in the mitigation of the COVID-19 pandemic, focusing on the etiological viral agent, comparative genomic analysis, population susceptibility, disease epidemiology, animal reservoirs, laboratory animal models, disease transmission, diagnosis using artificial intelligence interventions, therapeutics and vaccines, and disease mitigation measures to combat disease dissemination.
Article
Full-text available
The sudden outbreak of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV, later named SARS-CoV-2) in Wuhan, China, which rapidly grew into a global pandemic, marked the third introduction of a virulent coronavirus into the human society, affecting not only the healthcare system, but also the global economy. Although our understanding of coronaviruses has undergone a huge leap after two precedents, the effective approaches to treatment and epidemiological control are still lacking. In this article, we present a succinct overview of the epidemiology, clinical features, and molecular characteristics of SARS-CoV-2. We summarize the current epidemiological and clinical data from the initial Wuhan studies, and emphasize several features of SARS-CoV-2, which differentiate it from SARS-CoV and Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV), such as high variability of disease presentation. We systematize the current clinical trials that have been rapidly initiated after the outbreak of COVID-19 pandemic. Whereas the trials on SARS-CoV-2 genome-based specific vaccines and therapeutic antibodies are currently being tested, this solution is more long-term, as they require thorough testing of their safety. On the other hand, the repurposing of the existing therapeutic agents previously designed for other virus infections and pathologies happens to be the only practical approach as a rapid response measure to the emergent pandemic, as most of these agents have already been tested for their safety. These agents can be divided into two broad categories, those that can directly target the virus replication cycle, and those based on immunotherapy approaches either aimed to boost innate antiviral immune responses or alleviate damage induced by dysregulated inflammatory responses. The initial clinical studies revealed the promising therapeutic potential of several of such drugs, including favipiravir, a broad-spectrum antiviral drug that interferes with the viral replication, and hydroxychloroquine, the repurposed antimalarial drug that interferes with the virus endosomal entry pathway. We speculate that the current pandemic emergency will be a trigger for more systematic drug repurposing design approaches based on big data analysis.
Article
Full-text available
Background The COVID-19 has now been declared a global emergency by the World Health Organization. There is an emergent need to search for possible medications. Method Utilization of the available sequence information, homology modeling, and in slico docking a number of available medications might prove to be effective in inhibiting the COVID-19 two main drug targets the spike glycoprotein and the 3CL protease. Results Several compounds were determined from the in silico docking models that might prove to be effective inhibitor for the COVID-19. Several antiviral medications: Zanamivir, Indinavir, Saquinavir, and Remdesivir show potential as and 3CLPRO main proteinase inhibitors and as a treatment of COVID-19. Conclusion Zanamivir, Indinavir, Saquinavir, and Remdesivir are among the exciting hits on the 3CLPRO main proteinase. It is also exciting to uncover that Flavin Adenine Dinucleotide (FAD) Adeflavin, B2 Deficiency medicine, and Coenzyme A, a coenzyme, may also be potentially used for the treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infections. The use of these off-label medications may be beneficial in the treatment of the COVID-19.
Article
Background: Hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin have been used to treat patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19). However, evidence on the safety and efficacy of these therapies is limited. Methods: We conducted a multicenter, randomized, open-label, three-group, controlled trial involving hospitalized patients with suspected or confirmed Covid-19 who were receiving either no supplemental oxygen or a maximum of 4 liters per minute of supplemental oxygen. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive standard care, standard care plus hydroxychloroquine at a dose of 400 mg twice daily, or standard care plus hydroxychloroquine at a dose of 400 mg twice daily plus azithromycin at a dose of 500 mg once daily for 7 days. The primary outcome was clinical status at 15 days as assessed with the use of a seven-level ordinal scale (with levels ranging from one to seven and higher scores indicating a worse condition) in the modified intention-to-treat population (patients with a confirmed diagnosis of Covid-19). Safety was also assessed. Results: A total of 667 patients underwent randomization; 504 patients had confirmed Covid-19 and were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis. As compared with standard care, the proportional odds of having a higher score on the seven-point ordinal scale at 15 days was not affected by either hydroxychloroquine alone (odds ratio, 1.21; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.69 to 2.11; P = 1.00) or hydroxychloroquine plus azithromycin (odds ratio, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.57 to 1.73; P = 1.00). Prolongation of the corrected QT interval and elevation of liver-enzyme levels were more frequent in patients receiving hydroxychloroquine, alone or with azithromycin, than in those who were not receiving either agent. Conclusions: Among patients hospitalized with mild-to-moderate Covid-19, the use of hydroxychloroquine, alone or with azithromycin, did not improve clinical status at 15 days as compared with standard care. (Funded by the Coalition Covid-19 Brazil and EMS Pharma; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04322123.).
Article
The recent outbreak of novel coronavirus disease -19 (COVID-19) calls for and welcomes possible treatment strategies using drugs on the market. It is very efficient to apply computer-aided drug design techniques to quickly identify promising drug repurposing candidates, especially after the detailed 3D-structures of key virous proteins are resolved. The virus causing COVID-19 is SARS-Cov-2. Taking the advantage of a recently released crystal structure of SARS-Cov-2 main protease in complex with a covalently-bonded inhibitor, N3,1 I conducted virtual docking screening of approved drugs and drug candidates in clinical trials. For the top docking hits, I then performed molecular dynamics simulations followed by binding free energy calculations using an endpoint method called MM-PBSA-WSAS (Molecular Mechanics-Poisson Boltzmann Surface Area-Weighted Solvent-Accessible Surface Area).2-4 Several promising known drugs stand out as potential inhibitors of SARS-Cov-2 main protease, including Carfilzomib, Eravacycline, Valrubicin, Lopinavir and Elbasvir. Carfilzomib, an approved anti-cancer drug acting as a proteasome inhibitor, has the best MM-PBSA-WSAS binding free energy, -13.8 kcal/mol. The second-best repurposing drug candidate, eravacycline, is synthetic halogenated tetracycline class antibiotic. Streptomycin, another antibiotic and a charged molecule, also demonstrates some inhibitory effect, even though the predicted binding free energy of the charged form (-3.8 kcal/mol) is not nearly as low as that of the neutral form (-7.9 kcal/mol). One bioactive, PubChem 23727975, has a binding free energy of -12.9 kcal/mol. Detailed receptor-ligand interactions were analyzed and hot spots for the receptor-ligand binding were identified. I found that one hotspot residue HIS41, is a conserved residue across many viruses including SARS-Cov, SARS-Cov-2, MERS-Cov, and HCV. The findings of this study can facilitate rational drug design targeting the SARS-Cov-2 main protease.
Article
Importance The pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by the novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) presents an unprecedented challenge to identify effective drugs for prevention and treatment. Given the rapid pace of scientific discovery and clinical data generated by the large number of people rapidly infected by SARS-CoV-2, clinicians need accurate evidence regarding effective medical treatments for this infection. Observations No proven effective therapies for this virus currently exist. The rapidly expanding knowledge regarding SARS-CoV-2 virology provides a significant number of potential drug targets. The most promising therapy is remdesivir. Remdesivir has potent in vitro activity against SARS-CoV-2, but it is not US Food and Drug Administration approved and currently is being tested in ongoing randomized trials. Oseltamivir has not been shown to have efficacy, and corticosteroids are currently not recommended. Current clinical evidence does not support stopping angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers in patients with COVID-19. Conclusions and Relevance The COVID-19 pandemic represents the greatest global public health crisis of this generation and, potentially, since the pandemic influenza outbreak of 1918. The speed and volume of clinical trials launched to investigate potential therapies for COVID-19 highlight both the need and capability to produce high-quality evidence even in the middle of a pandemic. No therapies have been shown effective to date.