A preview of this full-text is provided by Springer Nature.
Content available from Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
RESEARCH PAPER
Variable-fidelity probability of improvement method for efficient
global optimization of expensive black-box problems
Xiongfeng Ruan
1,2
&Ping Jiang
2
&Qi Zhou
1
&Jiexiang Hu
2
&Leshi Shu
2
Received: 19 December 2019 /Revised: 16 May 2020 /Accepted: 4 June 2020
#Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020
Abstract
Variable-fidelity (VF) surrogate models have attracted significant attention recently in simulation-based design because they can
achieve a desirable accuracy at a reasonable cost by making use of the data from both low-fidelity (LF) and high-fidelity (HF)
simulations. To facilitate the usage ofVF surrogate models assisted efficient globaloptimization, there are still challenging issues
on (1) how to construct the VF surrogate model for simulations with variable-fidelity levels under the non-nested sampling data,
(2) how to determine the location and fidelity level of the samples simultaneously, and (3) how to handle constraints when VF
surrogate models are also used for constraints. In this work, a variable-fidelity probability of improvement (VF-PI) method is
proposed for computationally expensive black-box problems. First, a multi-level generalized Co-Kriging (GCK) model, which is
extended from the two-level GCK model, is developed for VF surrogate modeling of simulations with three or more levels of
fidelities under non-nested sampling data. Second, to determine the location and fidelity level of the sequential samples, an
extended probability of improvement (EPI) function is developed. In EPI function, the model correlation and cost ratio between
the LF and HF models, together with the sample density, are considered. Third, the probability of satisfying the constraints is
introduced and combined with the EPI function, enabling the proposed approach to handle VF optimization problems with
constraints. The comparison results illustrate that the proposed VF-PI method is more efficient and robust than the four compared
methods on the illustrated cases.
Keywords Variable-fidelity surrogate model .Sequential optimization .Probability of improvement .Co-Kriging
1 Introduction
Surrogate models have been widely used in engineering opti-
mization problems to replace the computationally expensive
simulations (Booker et al. 1999; Jiang et al. 2019a;Zhouetal.
2017). They are constructed based on available input param-
eter values and the corresponding quantity of interests (QoIs).
Generally, the computational burden to construct an accurate
surrogate in the whole design domain is unaffordable in the
surrogate model–baseddesignandoptimization(SBDO)
(Jiang et al. 2020; Zhang et al. 2019;Zhouetal.2019).
Therefore, efficient global optimization (EGO) approaches,
which sequentially allocate samples to balance the exploration
and exploitation, were put forward and have reached a great
success (Forrester et al. 2008;Queipoetal.2005;Wangand
Shan 2007). The development of different criteria for allocat-
ing the sequential samples results in different EGO ap-
proaches. Commonly used EGO approaches are expected im-
provement (EI) (Jones et al. 1998), lower confidence
bounding (LCB) (Cox and John 1992), and probability of
improvement (PI) (Jones 2001). The variations and extensions
of these three EGO approaches have also attracted significant
attention nowadays (Cheng et al. 2019;Dongetal.2018;Liu
et al. 2018b; Qian et al. 2019; Shi et al. 2019; Wang and
Ierapetritou 2018).
Although previous works demonstrated the apparent merits
of EGO approaches, for the computationally expensive high-
fidelity (HF) models, even performing the number of simula-
tions required for constructing a surrogate model could be too
Responsible Editor: Michael Kokkolaras
*Qi Zhou
qizhou@hust.edu.cn
1
School of Aerospace Engineering, Huazhong University of Science
& Technology, Wuhan 430074, Hubei, People’s Republic of China
2
The State Key Laboratory of Digital Manufacturing Equipment and
Technology, School of Mechanical Science and Engineering,
Huazhong University of Science & Technology, Wuhan 430074,
People’s Republic of China
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-020-02646-9
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization (2020) 62:3021–3052
/Published online: 20 August 2020
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.