R E S E A R C H A R T I C L E Open Access
Viewing an alpine environment positively
affects emotional analytics in patients with
somatoform, depressive and anxiety
disorders as well as in healthy controls
, Cornelia Ower
, Georg Kemmler
, Theresa Vill
, Caroline Martini
, Andrea Schmitt
Background: Patients with somatoform, depressive or anxiety disorders often don’t respond well to medical
treatment and experience many side effects. It is thus of clinical relevance to identify alternative, scientifically based,
treatments. Our approach is based on the recent evidence that urbanicity has been shown to be associated with
an increased risk for mental disorders. Conversely, green and blue environments show a dose-dependent beneficial
impact on mental health.
Methods: Here we evaluate the effect of viewing stimuli of individuals in an alpine environment on emotional
analytics in 183 patients with psychiatric disorders (mostly somatoform, depressive and anxiety disorders) and 315
healthy controls (HC). Emotional analytics (valence: unhappy vs happy, arousal: calm vs excited, dominance:
controlled vs in control) were assessed using the Self-Assessment Manikin. Further parameters related to mental
health and physical activity were recorded.
Results: Emotional analytics of patients indicated that they felt less happy, less in control and had higher levels of
arousal than HC when viewing neutral stimuli. The comparison alpine>neutral stimuli showed a significant positive
effect of alpine stimuli on emotional analytics in both groups. Patients and HC both felt attracted to the scenes
displayed in the alpine stimuli. Emotional analytics correlated positively with resilience and inversely with perceived
Conclusions: Preventive and therapeutic programs for patients with somatoform, depressive and anxiety disorders
should consider taking the benefits of natural outdoor environments, such as alpine environments, into account.
Organizational barriers which are preventing the implementation of such programs in clinical practice need to be
identified and addressed.
Keywords: Alpine environment, Resilience, Self-perceived stress, Self-Assessment Manikin, Emotional analytics,
Somatoform, depressive and anxiety disorders
© The Author(s). 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License,
which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give
appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if
changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons
licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons
licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain
permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the
data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
* Correspondence: firstname.lastname@example.org
Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Divison of
Psychiatry II (Psychosomatic Medicine), Medical University Innsbruck, Anichstr.
35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
Full list of author information is available at the end of the article
Hüfner et al. BMC Psychiatry (2020) 20:385
The natural environment is known to improve physical
and mental health: A meta-analysis reported an 8%
reduction in all-cause mortality for residents with the
highest nature outdoor exposure compared with the
lowest exposure group . Discovering blue  and
green  spaces is associated with psychological
benefits. Stress partly mediates the effect of natural out-
door environments on mental well-being . Green
spaces have been shown to reduce cortisol levels as a
marker of stress . Stress as an important marker of
mental health is significantly reduced by the exposure to
nature in a dose-response relationship, even if only visual
stimulation without physical exposure is used . Vis-
ual or auditory nature stimuli can facilitate recovery
from psychological stressful events [1,5] and from phys-
ical disease . In mental health, chronic stress is
among the strongest risk factors for depression but is
also an important pathogenetic factor in anxiety disor-
ders, post-traumatic stress disorders or somatoform dis-
Another factor through which exposure to natural
outdoor environments exerts its positive effect on
mental health might be through the strengthening of
resilience [33,34]. Resilience can be defined as one’s
ability to cope with and recover from adverse life events.
Resilience is improved by physical activity performed in
a natural outdoor environment but is not associated with
physical activity performed indoors . When the
natural environment is used to perform physical activity
the positive effects of physical activity and natural
environments can be combined: there is evidence that
exercising outdoors results in greater improvements of
mental well-being than exercising indoors with greater
feelings of delight, energy and revitalization, as well as
decreases in frustration, tiredness and anger .
The positive effects of the alpine natural environment
have rarely been examined. One of the few available
studies suggests that watching grand mountain scenes
triggers a greater mood improvement than mundane
nature. Furthermore, participants were feeling signifi-
cantly more connected to others, more caring, and
more spiritual after watching awe-inspiring nature con-
dition . Hikers of alpine wilderness trails reported
substantial stress reduction and mental rejuvenation
following a day or overnight hike . Furthermore, in a
crossover trial focusing on differences between indoor
and alpine activity, mountain hiking showed signifi-
cantly greater positive effects on affective valence and
activation compared to indoor physical activity . It
is unknown whether the mechanisms linking different
natural environments (green space, blues space, alpine)
to mental health are due to similar or differential effects
Although studies report an improvement on various
psychological measures as a result of exposure to
alpine environments, they do not refer to a possible
therapeutic effect. There are only few studies investi-
gating therapeutic alpine interventions as treatment
for patients in mental health care. In a mountain hik-
ing program for suicidal patients, participants
reported significant reduction in depression, hopeless-
ness and suicidal ideation . In another study
adults and youth with mental illness experienced
significant improvements in self-esteem, mastery and
resilience following activities like mountain biking and
raft building .
The primary aim of the present study was to investi-
gate whether stimuli depicting alpine environments
would elicit differential or similar emotional analytics in
patients with somatoform, depressive and anxiety disor-
ders and healthy controls in order to judge the potential
usefulness for a therapeutic intervention program. This
aim was approached by the following study setting:
1) We assessed emotional analytics upon viewing
neutral and alpine stimuli in patients with
somatoform, depressive and anxiety disorders and
healthy controls. The alpine stimuli depicted
individuals while engaged in physical activity in an
2) We investigated whether there was a correlation of
emotional analytics with resilience or perceived
stress in patients and healthy controls.
3) We measured the amount of self-performed
physical activity in an alpine environment as a
marker of previous exposure to the depicted stimuli
in a natural environment.
This is a cross-sectional observational study including a
quasi-experimental part (Fig. 1). The whole study was
performed online. The first part of the study contained
questionnaires, while the second part recorded emo-
tional reaction to visual stimuli. It was not possible to
skip one question or a questionnaire. The current data is
part of a larger study examining the effect of physical ac-
tivity in an alpine environment on mental health, part of
which has been published . Innsbruck is one of few
urban spaces located directly within the Alps and thus
allows for easy access to the alpine environment. The
ethics commission of the Medical University of Inns-
bruck reviewed and approved the study protocol. After
being informed in detail about the study aims and proce-
dures, participants provided informed consent prior to
study participation. Study recruitment was conducted
over a four-month period in 2016.
Hüfner et al. BMC Psychiatry (2020) 20:385 Page 2 of 10
Participants and recruiting procedure are described in
, participant numbers vary slightly compared to
the previous publication due to missing data in indi-
vidual participants. In brief, a total of 1029 individuals
participated in an open online-only survey. They were
recruited via email (mailing lists), social media and
classified websites or whilst treated at the Department
of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics
(Division of Psychiatry II/Psychosomatic Medicine) at
Innsbruck Medical University at the inpatient or
outpatient clinic. We included mainly patients with
the diagnosis of somatoform, depressive and anxiety
disorders. For the present analysis participants who
terminated the questionnaire early i.e. prior to the
Self-Assessment Manikin (SAM) ratings (missing data
n= 436, Fig. 2) were excluded from the study. This
high drop-out rate was mainly due to the fact that
SAM ratings of emotional analytics were performed
as the final phase of the questionnaire and it was not
possible to skip questions. Comparison of participants
terminating early with those included in the data
analysis showed that the former were significantly
older (mean age ± standard deviation, 33.5 ± 12.1 years
vs 29.7 ± 10.1 years, p< 0.001, Mann-Whitney U-test)
and that a larger proportion of them was female
(68.4% vs 61.2%, p= 0.017, Chi-square test). Despite
statistical significance, the differences in age (effect
size d = 0.34) and sex distribution (odds ratio = 1.37)
were comparatively small. Furthermore participants
that reported implausible values (n= 8), screened
positively for alcohol abuse only (n=54) or for an
eating disorder only (Anorexia nervosa and Bulimia
nervosa; n= 33) were excluded from the present
analysis (Fig. 2). In Anorexia nervosa or Bulimia
nervosa it is known that high levels of PA are used
as tool for losing weight and therefore are an expres-
sion of disease. Therefore, these patients were
excluded . There were 4 to 13% missing values for
individual SAM ratings. The 498 participants included
in the present analysis consisted of two groups.
Patients screened positively for mental health disorder
on the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ, n= 183).
Participants without positive PHQ screening (n= 315)
formed the control group (HC).
Fig. 1 Flow chart of the overall study design including details of the
quasi experimental part with presentation of alpine stimuli and
emotional analytic ratings (boxed section shaded in grey). Specific
questionnaires are indicated. BRS = Brief Resilience Scale, GPAQ =
General Physical Activity Questionnaire, PHQ = Patient Health
Questionnaire, PSS = Perceived Stress Scale. (…) indicates that there
were questionnaires at the indicated point in the study design not
analyzed in the current study but in 
Hüfner et al. BMC Psychiatry (2020) 20:385 Page 3 of 10
Stimuli were alternating 5 neutral pictures (re-staged to
official International Affective Picture System (IAPS)
pictures (slide no. 6150, 7009, 5661, 5500, 7150)) and 5
alpine stimuli (Fig. 3). Neutral pictures displayed figural
subjects of daily life (e.g. mug, wall, umbrella). Alpine
stimuli displayed alpine environments with individuals
performing some sort of physical activity therein (e.g.
hiking, biking, skiing). The pictures were presented to all
participants in the same order. Two picture stimuli had
to be excluded due to considerations related to the
displayed content (canyon wall in the neutral stimuli
and paraglider in the mountains in the alpine stimuli)
and their mean ratings for at least one of the analyzed
dimensions ranging two standard deviations outside the
mean of the other stimuli in the group. Pictures were
displayed for 5 seconds before the page with the emo-
tional analytic ratings appeared. Each stimulus could
only be observed once (Fig. 1).
Socio-demographic parameters included information on
age, sex, education and marital status. Mental health was
assessed using the German version of Patient Health
Fig. 2 Flowchart of patient and healthy control recruitmen. Excluded cases terminated early, reported implausible values or had a single diagnose
of alcohol abuse or eating disorder. Abbreviations: BRS = Brief Resilience Scale, GPAQ = General Physical Activity Questionnaire, PHQ = Patient
Health Questionnaire, PSS = Perceived Stress Scale, SAM ratings = Self-Assessment Manikin for emotional analytic ratings. (…) indicates that there
were questionnaires at the indicated point in the study design not analyzed in the current study but in 
Hüfner et al. BMC Psychiatry (2020) 20:385 Page 4 of 10
Questionnaire . Additionally, open text fields were
provided for entering psychiatric diagnoses. Resilience
was measured using the Brief Resilience Scale (BRS)
, self-perceived stress using the Perceived Stress
Scale (PSS)  and physical activity (PA) using the
Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ-2) .
PA is calculated using metabolic equivalents of tasks
(METs) as a unit for energy expense. As proposed by the
World Health Organization we classified PA in
moderate and vigorous intensity. We adapted the
standard questionnaire to measure PA performed in the
To measure emotional response we used the Self-
Assessment Manikin (SAM) 9-point Likert-scale. This
scale measures emotional analytics in the three
dimensions valence, arousal and dominance . The
valence scale ranges from a frowning, unhappy (adjec-
tives used in the SAM manual: unhappy, annoyed,
unsatisfied, melancholic, despaired, bored; lower
values) to a smiling, happy figure (happy, pleased,
satisfied, contented, hopeful). The arousal scale
displays the lowest value with a calm, eyes-closed
figure (relaxed, calm, sluggish, dull, sleepy, unar-
oused), whilst the highest value is represented by an
excited figure (stimulated, excited, frenzied, jittery,
wide-awake, aroused). The lowest values in the
dominance scale are symbolized by a controlled small
figure (controlled, influenced, cared-for, awed, submis-
sive, guided) whilst highest values are represented by
a dominant and oversized figure (controlling, influen-
tial, in control, important, dominant, autonomous).
After presenting a picture for 5 seconds participants
were asked to rate their emotional reaction in the
three dimensions. For alpine stimuli, we added a
fourth dimension asking about ones attraction to the
situation, labelled motivational direction. The 9-point
Likert-scale ranged from “Idon’twanttobeinthis
situation”to “I want to be in the situation”.
Metric variables were analyzed for normal distribution
prior to applying further statistical tests by assessing
their skewness and their kurtosis, considering skewness
values > 0.5 or < −0.5  and kurtosis values > 1 or < −
1 as deviations from a normal distribution requiring
non-parametric testing. To compare emotional reactions
between overall neutral and alpine pictures we created a
mean score for each category. In each category one
picture was excluded due to statistical outliers (paraglide
in alpine pictures; red wall in neutral pictures). Mean
scores were calculated for each emotional dimension per
person if at least three scores were completed. Group
comparisons (patients vs. HC) were performed using t-
test, Mann-Whitney U-test and Chi-square test, depend-
ing on the variable type and distribution. As the two
groups differed significantly in their age, education,
marital status, and work situation, we also performed
analyses of covariance with adjustment for these poten-
tial confounders. As the emotional analytic ratings
displayed missing values (4 to 13%), we performed an
additional analysis where missing ratings were replaced
by imputed values. The SPSS Missing Value Analysis
procedure with Little’s test for missingness completely at
random (MCAR) and imputation by expectation-
maximization (EM) was used for this purpose . The
relationship between resilience, self-perceived stress, PA
and emotional analytics was investigated on a descriptive
level by means of correlation analysis. Spearman rank
correlation coefficients were used as most the variables
involved showed deviations from a normal distribution.
Sociodemographic characteristics and clinical features
The sociodemographic characteristics of patients and
HC are displayed in Table 1. Patients’diagnoses accord-
ing to PHQ were in decreasing frequency: somatoform
disorder (n= 101, 55.2%), major depressive syndrome
Fig. 3 Examples of alpine stimuli depicting individuals performing physical activity in an alpine environment. Neutral stimuli are not depicted
since this is not considered good scientific practice for the IAPS picture collection 
Hüfner et al. BMC Psychiatry (2020) 20:385 Page 5 of 10
(n= 67, 36.6%), other anxiety syndrome (n= 45, 24.6%),
panic syndrome (n= 36, 19.7%), other depressive
syndrome (n= 34, 18.6%), alcohol abuse (n= 31, 16.9%),
binge eating disorder (n= 23, 12.6%), bulimia nervosa
(n= 10, 5.5%) and others (n= 2, 1.1%). More than half
of the patients (n= 100, 51.9%) were diagnosed with
more than one mental health disorder, the most preva-
lent combination was somatoform disorder and major
depressive syndrome (n= 42, 23.0%).
Comparison of resilience, self-perceived stress and
emotional analytics in patients and HC
The mean score of the Brief Resilience Scale (BRS) was
significantly lower in patients than in HC (Mann-Whitney
U-test, p<0.001; Table 2). Furthermore the total score of
the Preceived Stress Scale (PSS) was significantly higher in
patients than in HC (Mann-Whitney U-test, p<0.001;
Comparing the mean emotional analytics score in
neutral and alpine stimuli, patients reported significantly
lower values for valence (both ps < 0.001) indicating that
they felt less happy than HC, and dominance (neutral: p=
0.021, alpine: p< 0.001; Table 2)indicatingthattheyfelt
less in control than HC. Arousal when viewing neutral
stimuli was significantly higher (p< 0.001) for patients in-
dicating that they felt more aroused or jittery than the HC
at baseline. In alpine pictures the difference in arousal was
not significant between patients and HC (p=0.223; Table
2). In the fourth dimension asking about attraction to the
displayed alpine situation, the mean score was significantly
lower in patients as in HC (p< 0.001 Table 2)although
both groups showed a high attraction to the alpine stimuli.
All statistically significant differences in Table 2remained
significant when adjusting for age, education, marital sta-
tus, and work situation by analysis of covariance. Missing
value analysis for emotional analytics revealed that SAM
ratings were not missing completely at random (Little’s
= 3607.5, d.f. = 3314, p< 0.001). Replacement of
missing emotional analytics ratings by the EM imputation
method led to comparable results as the analysis without
replacement. Mean ratings changed by less than 0.1 in
both groups. Moreover, all significant group differences
To measure the effect of the alpine stimuli normalized
to the neutral baseline, we evaluated the difference of each
emotional dimension between alpine and neutral pictures.
The comparison alpine > neutral stimuli was significantly
greater than 0 for both patients and HC indicating a
positive effect of alpine stimuli on emotional analytics. For
valence and dominance this comparison of alpine > neu-
tral stimuli did not differ significantly between patients
and HC (Table 2). For arousal the difference was signifi-
cantly smaller in patients than in HC due to higher base-
line arousal values in patients (p<0.001; Table2).
Table 1 Sociodemographic characteristics of patients and healthy controls (adapted with participant numbers for the current
analysis from )
Variable Groups Comparison
Patients (n= 183) Controls (n= 315) Test statistics D.f. p-value
Age in years
36.0 ± 12.8 32.8 ± 11.7 Z = 2.42
117 (63.9) 187 (58.4) χ
3 < 0.001
University 41 (22.4) 111 (35.2) ––
Secondary school 62 (33.9) 133 (42.2) ––
Vocational training 53 (29.0) 34 (10.8) ––
Compulsory school and other 27 (14.8) 37 (11.7) ––
Single 105 (57.4) 194 (61.6) ––
Married 56 (30.6) 110 (34.9) ––
Separated/divorced/widowed 22 (12.0) 11 (3.5) ––
2 < 0.001
Full−/part-time employment 75 (41.0) 177 (56.2)
In education/study/vocational training 49 (26.8) 122 (38.7)
Unemployed 59 (32.2) 16 (5.1)
mean ± standard deviation
absolute number (percent)
test statistic for Mann-Whitney U-test
test statistics for Chi-Square test
Hüfner et al. BMC Psychiatry (2020) 20:385 Page 6 of 10
Correlation between resilience, self-perceived stress,
physical activity in an alpine environment and emotional
For the correlation analysis between resilience, self-
perceived stress and emotional response, we combined the
patient and HC group to one total sample. Resilience corre-
lated positively in both neutral and alpine stimuli with the
emotional analytics for valence, dominance and attraction
(all ps < 0.001, Table 3) indicating that greater resilience
was associated with higher emotional ratings. Self-perceived
stress correlated negatively with valence, dominance and at-
traction in both neutral and alpine stimuli (all ps < 0.05;
Table 3) demonstrating that higher stress levels were asso-
ciated with lower emotional ratings (Table 3).
Arousal while viewing neutral pictures correlated in an
inverse way: negatively with resilience and positively with
perceived stress. Subanalyses demonstrated that this was
mostly due to patients´ values (not shown). This demon-
strates that individuals with low resilience and high levels
of stress feel more aroused or jittery at baseline compared
to resilient individuals who feel calmer when viewing neu-
tral stimuli. Physical activity in an alpine environment cor-
related positively with all four emotional analytics in
alpine stimuli (all p< 0.001), whilst there was no signifi-
cant correlation with neutral stimuli (Table 3).
In the present study we evaluated the effect of viewing
alpine stimuli on emotional analytics in patients with
somatoform, depressive and anxiety disorders and healthy
controls. The major findings were: 1) the emotional ana-
lytics valence and dominance were significantly lower in
patients compared to HC for both alpine and neutral
stimuli. Baseline arousal when viewing neutral stimuli was
significantly higher in patients, 2) the emotional analytic
scores were significantly higher for alpine compared to
neutral pictures for patients as well as for HC, 3) Emo-
tional analytics of alpine pictures correlated positively with
resilience and physical activity in an alpine environment
and inversely with perceived stress.
Resilience and perceived stress in patients with
In patients with somatoform, depressive and anxiety
disorders we observed lower levels of resilience and higher
levels of perceived stress compared to HC. These findings
are in line with previous studies showing that patients with
mental disorders often lack strategies of a resilient mindset,
which can improved during recovery . Likewise per-
ceived stress has been shown to be elevated in states of
emotional-ill being . Impaired resilience and higher
Table 2 Resilience, self-perceived stress and emotional analytics (SAM ratings) in patients and controls
Variable Group Comparison
Patients (N= 183)
Mean ± SD
Controls (N= 315)
Mean ± SD
Test statistics Effect size, d p-value
Resilience (BRS score) 2.78 ± 0.85 ↓3.76 ± 0.66 Z = -11.84 −1.33 < 0.001
Stress (PSS score) 9.53 ± 3.61 ↑4.73 ± 2.50 Z = -13.47 1.62 < 0.001
Valence 5.09 ± 1.06 ↓5.65 ± 1.21 Z = -4.696 −0.48 < 0.001
Arousal 4.13 ± 1.31 ↑3.38 ± 1.23 Z = 5.848 0.60 < 0.001
Dominance 4.78 ± 1.08 ↓5.13 ± 1.35 Z = -2.312 −0.15 0.021
Valence 6.99 ± 1.68 ↓7.85 ± 1.12 Z = -5.661 −0.64 < 0.001
Arousal 5.01 ± 1.76 5.17 ± 1.94 Z = -1.218 −0.09 0.223
Dominance 5.85 ± 1.52 ↓6.42 ± 1.58 Z = -3.655 −0.37 < 0.001
Attraction 6.62 ± 2.10 ↓7.52 ± 1.48 Z = -4.106 −0.52 < 0.001
Valence 1.91 ± 1.80 *** 2.19 ± 1.42 *** Z = -1.466 −0.18 0.143
Arousal 0.87 ± 2.11 ↓** 1.79 ± 1.91 *** Z = -4.741 −0.46 < 0.001
Dominance 1.09 ± 1.61 *** 1.29 ± 1.67 *** Z = -1.465 −0.12 0.143
Abbreviations:BRS Brief Resilience Scale 13, PSS Perceived Stress Scale, SAM Self-Assesment Manikin, SD standard deviation
p-values were calculated using Mann-Whitney U-test
↑Significantly higher scores in patients than in healthy controls.
↓Significantly lower scores in patients than in healthy controls.
** Difference “alpine –neutral”significantly greater than 0, Z = 3.25, p< 0.01
*** Difference “alpine –neutral”significantly greater than 0, always Z ≥4.5, p< 0.001
Hüfner et al. BMC Psychiatry (2020) 20:385 Page 7 of 10
perceived stress, are part of the current vulnerability-stress-
model of psychosomatic disorders .
Emotional analytics in response to neutral and alpine
stimuli in patients with somatoform, depressive and
We found lower levels of valence and dominance in
patients than in HC over all (neutral and alpine) stimuli.
The lower levels of valence (i.e. more unhappy) reflect the
fact that our largest subgroup in our patient group was
„depressive disorders”(55.2%). This confirms previous
studies showing that patients suffering from depression
tend to show lower levels of valence as they describe a
feeling of numbness und joylessness in their lives . A
dysfunction in emotional processing might be the under-
lying pathophysiological concept . Viewing alpine
stimuli lead to a comparable increase in valence (feeling
happier) and dominance (feeling more in control) in
patients and controls. Baseline arousal was higher in the
patients than HC a finding previously described in individ-
uals with depressive symptoms . This led to a signifi-
cantly smaller increase in arousal between neutral and
alpine stimuli for patients than controls.
Association of resilience, perceived stress and emotional
The association of resilience and perceived stress with
emotional analytics was found not only in patients with
somatoform, depressive and anxiety disorders but also in
healthy controls. This underlines the theory that there is
a continuum of health and disease also for somatoform,
depressive and anxiety disorders, and that mechanisms
of overtly ill patients are also present in individuals with
sub-syndromal forms of psychosomatic disorders point-
ing towards general mechanisms of mental health .
The inverse correlation of arousal while viewing neutral
pictures (negatively with resilience and positively with
perceived stress) were mostly due to patients´ values:
They are more jittery or aroused at baseline which fits
well with their predominant diagnoses of somatoform,
depressive and anxiety disorders .
The effect of alpine stimuli on emotional analytics
The effect the alpine environment on mental health has
rarely been researched to date, most studies where
performed on other natural environments. In the present
study we found that both patients and HC reacted to
alpine stimuli in form of a significant increase in valence,
arousal and dominance compared to neutral stimuli.
This finding of a positive impact on emotional analytics
is in line with previous studies evaluating psychological
and physical reactions to visual natural stimuli. Compar-
ing reactions to urban with those to natural scenery a
significant increased positive affect in emotional
response could be found in nature condition only using
virtual reality stimuli . The restorative effect of the
natural environment, even if only present within visual
stimuli, might be explained by a reduction in stress
levels induced by exposure to views of nature .
Patients and HC showed higher emotional analytics for
valence and dominance, but we also detected an increase
in arousal in response to the alpine stimuli. This is in
contrast with several studies pointing towards relaxation
and tranquility felt while viewing natural environment
. One possible explanation of our diverging finding
is that most of the alpine pictures shown in this study
displayed physically active persons (e.g. downhill skiing).
Comparable data were published by IAPS showing high
arousal ratings in the SAM scale when viewing stimuli
of physically active persons in alpine surroundings .
People living in perceived safe, lively and beautiful
neighborhoods were more likely to engage in PA, and
Table 3 Correlation of emotional analytics (SAM) with resilience,
self-perceived stress and PA in alpine environment
Total sample (n= 498)
BRS PSS PA in alpine environment
0.188*** −0.249*** 0.081
p 0.000 0.000 0.078
−0.183*** 0.187*** −0.091
p 0.000 0.000 0.051
0.227*** −0.150** −0.021
p 0.000 0.002 0.656
0.303*** −0.276*** 0.440***
p 0.000 0.000 0.000
0.073 −0.096* 0.225***
p 0.121 0.040 0.000
0.209*** −0.172*** 0.277***
p 0.000 0.000 0.000
0.222*** −0.172*** 0.413***
p 0.000 0.000 0.000
0.125** −0.043 0.316***
p 0.007 0.358 0.000
0.175*** −0.188*** 0.266***
p 0.000 0.000 0.000
0.043 −0.025 0.278***
p 0.368 0.604 0.000
Abbreviations:MET metabolic equivalents, BRS Brief Resilience Scale, PA
physical activity, PSS Perceived Stress Scale
: Spearman rank correlation coefficient, p: p-value, *p< 0.05,
**p< 0.01. ***p< 0.001
Hüfner et al. BMC Psychiatry (2020) 20:385 Page 8 of 10
people living in perceived boring and depressing
neighborhoods were less likely to engage in PA .
Multilevel modeling results showed that after controlling
for depressive symptoms at baseline, symptoms
decreased in neighborhoods where physical environment
and social environment were better .
The effect of physical activity in an alpine environment
on mental health
Physical activity by itself and especially when performed
in an outdoor/green/alpine environment is known to
improve mental health. Few pilot studies could confirm
the positive effect of the alpine environment when
performing physical activity [29,32,37]. This is in line
with our finding that self-performed physical activity
(METs) correlates with higher valence and dominance
felt by participants after viewing alpine but not neutral
stimuli. Conversely, some studies did not detect any dif-
ferences in affective response when comparing alpine to
indoor physical exercise . Furthermore, no effect of
anthropogenic elements in the alpine environment on
acute stress-related physiological responses was found
. Though importantly the latter studies as well as the
present one showed a positive correlation of outdoor
physical activity on parameters of mental well-being.
The main limitation of the study is that in a survey study
no causal relationship between the emotional analytics
and mental health can be obtained. Furthermore, the ex-
posure in our study was applied in form of visual stimuli
instead of actually spending time in an alpine environ-
ment. The present study does not allow the differenti-
ation which components of viewing alpine environment
lead to the observed positive effects on the emotional
analytics. This was a cross sectional study which cannot
give any evidence about the long term effects on emo-
tional analytics. Due to the spread of the study invitation
via social media, flyers, classified websites and mailing
list, we cannot report the response rate.
Conclusion and consequences for clinical practice
Therapeutic programs for patients with somatoform,
depressive and anxiety disorders should contain physical
activity and according to our results, also consider taking
the effect of nature into account. The results from the
current study indicate that patients with somatoform,
depressive and anxiety disorders have a positive attitude
towards physical activity in an alpine environment and
that emotional analytics such as valence and dominance
increase in patients and HC in a comparable manner.
Practical strategies to implement such programs should
be discussed. Obvious barriers to the implementation of
such programs are primarily of a financial origin, since
in our medical system money for medications and in-
patient hospital stays is readily available while thera-
peutic programs including physical activity in an alpine
environment are not financed by public healthcare. To
further elucidate the effect of physical activity in an al-
pine environment on mental health longitudinal inter-
vention studies are needed. The current study indicates
that such studies could be promising.
We thank Dr. Thomas Post, Dr. Ulrike Weber-Lau, Dr. Barbara Mangweth-
Matzek, for help with patient recruitment and Dr. Christian Widschwendter
for helpful discussion. This study is part of the doctoral thesis of Cornelia
Study design: K.H., C.O., C.M., G.K., B.S-U. Data collection: K. H, C.O., C. M. Data
analysis: K.H., C.O., G.K., T.V., A.S. Data interpretation: all authors. Writing and
review of manuscript: all authors. The author(s) read and approved the final
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the
public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Availability of data and materials
Data are available from the first author upon request.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The study was approved by the ethics committee of Innsbruck Medical
University (AN2014–0243). After being informed in detail about the study
aims and procedures, participants provided informed written consent prior
to study participation.
Consent for publication
The authors report no conflict of interest.
Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Divison of
Psychiatry II (Psychosomatic Medicine), Medical University Innsbruck, Anichstr.
35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and
Psychosomatics, Divison of Psychiatry I, Medical University Innsbruck,
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University
Hospital, Ludwig Maximilians-University (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany.
Laboratory of Neuroscience (LIM27), Institute of Psychiatry, University of São
Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Received: 10 December 2019 Accepted: 13 July 2020
1. Alvarsson JJ, Wiens S, Nilsson ME. Stress recovery during exposure to nature
sound and environmental noise. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2010;7(3):
2. Bangasser DA, Valentino RJ. Sex differences in stress-related psychiatric
disorders: neurobiological perspectives. Front Neuroendocrinol. 2014;35(3):
3. Bezzina L, Touyz S, Young S, et al. Accuracy of self-reported physical activity
in patients with anorexia nervosa: links with clinical features. J Eat Disord.
4. Bowen DJ, Neill JT, Crisp SJR. Wilderness adventure therapy effects on the
mental health of youth participants. Eval Program Plann. 2016;58:49–59.
5. Brown DK, Barton JL, Gladwell VF. Viewing nature scenes positively affects
recovery of autonomic function following acute-mental stress. Environ Sci
Technol. 2013;47(11):5562–9. https://doi.org/10.1021/es305019p.
Hüfner et al. BMC Psychiatry (2020) 20:385 Page 9 of 10
6. Bull FC, Maslin TS, Armstrong T. Global physical activity questionnaire
(GPAQ): nine country reliability and validity study. J Phys Act Health. 2009;
7. Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R. A global measure of perceived stress. J
Health Soc Behav. 1983;24(4):385–96. https://doi.org/10.2307/2136404.
8. Cole DN, Hall TE. Experiencing the Restorative Components of Wilderness
Environments: Does Congestion Interfere and Does Length of Exposure
Matter? Environ Behav. 2010;42(6):806–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/
9. Dai Q, Wei J, Shu X, Feng Z. Negativity bias for sad faces in depression: an
event-related potential study. Clin Neurophysiol. 2016;127(12):3552–60.
10. Davis J. Psychological benefits of nature experiences: an outline of research
and theory- with special reference to transpersonal psychology. In: N. U. a.
S. o. L. Borders; 2004.
11. de Bell S, Graham H, Jarvis S, White P. The importance of nature in
mediating social and psychological benefits associated with visits to
freshwater blue space. Landsc Urban Plan. 2017;167:118–27. https://doi.org/
12. Fava GA, Cosci F, Sonino N. Current psychosomatic practice. Psychother
Psychosom. 2017;86(1):13–30. https://doi.org/10.1159/000448856.
13. Gascon M, Triguero-Mas M, Martínez D, Dadvand P, Forns J, Plasència A,
Nieuwenhuijsen MJ. Mental health benefits of long-term exposure to
residential green and blue spaces: a systematic review. Int J Environ Res
Public Health. 2015;12(4):4354–79. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph120404354.
14. Gascon M, Triguero-Mas M, Martínez D, Dadvand P, Rojas-Rueda D, Plasència A,
et al. Residential green spaces and mortality: a systematic review. Environ Int.
15. Gilbert KE, Tonge NA, Thompson RJ. Associations between depression, anxious
arousal and manifestations of psychological inflexibility. J Behav Ther Exp
Psychiatry. 2019;62:88–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2018.09.006.
16. Gräfe K, Zipfel S, Herzog W, Löwe B. Screening psychischer Störungen mit
dem “Gesundheitsfragebogen für Patienten (PHQ-D)”. Diagnostica. 2004;
17. Hazer M, Formica MK, Dieterlen S, Morley CP. The relationship between self-
reported exposure to greenspace and human stress in Baltimore, MD.
Landsc Urban Plan. 2018;169:47–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.
18. https://brownmath.com/stat/shape.htm (retrieved 2570572020).
19. IBM SPSS manual, ftp://service.boulder.ibm.com/software/analytics/spss/
20. Joye Y, Bolderdijk JW. An exploratory study into the effects of extraordinary
nature on emotions, mood, and prosociality. Front Psychol. 2015;5:1577.
21. Jung S, Proske M, Kahl KG, Krüger TH, Wollmer MA. The new Hamburg-
Hannover agitation scale in clinical samples: manifestation and differences
of agitation in depression, anxiety, and borderline personality disorder.
Psychopathology. 2016;49(6):420–8. https://doi.org/10.1159/000451029.
22. Kadzikowska-Wrzosek R. Perceived stress , emotional ill-being and
psychosomatic symptoms in high school students : the moderating effect of
self-regulation competences. Arch Psychiatry Psychother. 2012;14(3):25–33.
23. Kemmis LK, Wanigaratne S, Ehntholt KA. Emotional processing in individuals
with substance use disorder and posttraumatic stress disorder. Int J Ment
Heal Addict. 2017;15(4):900–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-016-9727-6.
24. Keyes CLM. Promoting and protecting mental health as flourishing: a
complementary strategy for improving national mental health. Am Psychol.
25. Lang PJ, M Bradley M, Cuthbert B. International Affective Picture System (IAPS):
Affective Ratings of Pictures and Instruction Manual (Rep. No. A-8); 2008.
26. Lee D, Cha B, Park C-S, Kim B-J, Lee C-S, Lee S-J, et al. Effects of resilience
on quality of life in patients with bipolar disorder. J Affect Disord. 2017;207:
27. Lehman RS. Statistics and research design in the behavioral sciences. Belmont:
Wadsworth/Thomson Learning; 1991. ISBN: 0-534-13878-0 (hardcover).
28. Liu Y, Wang R, Lu Y, Li Z, Chen H, Cao M, Zhang Y. Natural outdoor
environment, neighbourhood social cohesion and mental health: Using
multilevel structural equation modelling, streetscape and remote-sensing
metrics. Urban Forestry Urban Greening. 2020;48:126576. https://doi.org/10.
29. Niedermeier M, Einwanger J, Hartl A, Kopp M. Affective responses in
mountain hiking-a randomized crossover trial focusing on differences
between indoor and outdoor activity. PLoS One. 2017a;12(5):e0177719.
30. Niedermeier M, Grafetstatter C, Hartl A, Kopp M. A randomized crossover
trial on acute stress-related physiological responses to mountain hiking. Int
J Environ Res Public Health. 2017b;14(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/
31. Niedermeier M, Grafetstatter C, Kopp M, Huber D, Mayr M, Pichler C, et al.
The role of anthropogenic elements in the environment for affective states
and cortisol concentration in mountain hiking-a crossover trial. Int J Environ
Res Public Health. 2019;16(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16020290.
32. Ower C, Kemmler G, Vill T, Martini C, Schmitt A, Sperner-Unterweger B, et al.
The effect of physical activity in an alpine environment on quality of life is
mediated by resilience in patients with psychosomatic disorders and
healthy controls. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2018. https://doi.org/10.
33. Panno A, Carrus G, Lafortezza R, Mariani L, Sanesi G. Nature-based solutions
to promote human resilience and wellbeing in cities during increasingly hot
summers. Environ Res. 2017;159:249–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.
34. Ritchie SD, Wabano MJ, Russell K, Enosse L, Young NL. Promoting resilience
and wellbeing through an outdoor intervention designed for Aboriginal
adolescents. Rural Remote Health. 2014;14:2523.
35. Slavich GM, Irwin MR. From stress to inflammation and major depressive
disorder: a social signal transduction theory of depression. Psychol Bull.
36. Smith BW, Dalen J, Wiggins K, Tooley E, Christopher P, Bernard J. The brief
resilience scale: assessing the ability to bounce back. Int J Behav Med. 2008;
37. Sturm J, Ploderl M, Fartacek C, Kralovec K, Neunhauserer D, Niederseer D,
et al. Physical exercise through mountain hiking in high-risk suicide patients.
A randomized crossover trial. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2012;126(6):467–75.
38. Thompson Coon J, Boddy K, Stein K, Whear R, Barton J, Depledge MH. Does
participating in physical activity in outdoor natural environments have a
greater effect on physical and mental wellbeing than physical activity
indoors? A systematic review. Environ Sci Technol. 2011;45(5):1761–72.
39. Triguero-Mas M, Donaire-Gonzalez D, Seto E, Valentín A, Martínez D, Smith
G, et al. Natural outdoor environments and mental health: stress as a
possible mechanism. Environ Res. 2017;159:629–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
40. Twohig-Bennett C, Jones A. The health benefits of the great outdoors: a
systematic review and meta-analysis of greenspace exposure and health
outcomes. Environ Res. 2018;166:628–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.
41. Ulrich RS. View through a window may influence recovery from surgery.
42. Valtchanov D, Barton KR, Ellard C. Restorative effects of virtual nature
settings. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2010;13(5):503–12. https://doi.org/
43. van den Berg M, van Poppel M, van Kamp I, Andrusaityte S, Balseviciene B,
Cirach M, et al. Visiting green space is associated with mental health and
vitality: a cross-sectional study in four european cities. Health Place. 2016;38:
44. Wang R, Liu Y, Lu Y, et al. The linkage between the perception of
neighbourhood and physical activity in Guangzhou, China: using street
view imagery with deep learning techniques. Int J Health Geogr. 2019;18:18.
45. Wang Y, Chen YC, Shen HW, Morrow-Howell N. Neighborhood and depressive
symptoms: a comparison of rural and urban Chinese older adults. The
Gerontologist. 2018;58(1):68–78. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnx063.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in
published maps and institutional affiliations.
Hüfner et al. BMC Psychiatry (2020) 20:385 Page 10 of 10
Terms and Conditions
Springer Nature journal content, brought to you courtesy of Springer Nature Customer Service Center GmbH (“Springer Nature”).
Springer Nature supports a reasonable amount of sharing of research papers by authors, subscribers and authorised users (“Users”), for small-
scale personal, non-commercial use provided that all copyright, trade and service marks and other proprietary notices are maintained. By
purposes, Springer Nature considers academic use (by researchers and students) to be non-commercial.
These Terms are supplementary and will apply in addition to any applicable website terms and conditions, a relevant site licence or a personal
subscription. These Terms will prevail over any conflict or ambiguity with regards to the relevant terms, a site licence or a personal subscription
(to the extent of the conflict or ambiguity only). For Creative Commons-licensed articles, the terms of the Creative Commons license used will
We collect and use personal data to provide access to the Springer Nature journal content. We may also use these personal data internally within
ResearchGate and Springer Nature and as agreed share it, in an anonymised way, for purposes of tracking, analysis and reporting. We will not
otherwise disclose your personal data outside the ResearchGate or the Springer Nature group of companies unless we have your permission as
While Users may use the Springer Nature journal content for small scale, personal non-commercial use, it is important to note that Users may
use such content for the purpose of providing other users with access on a regular or large scale basis or as a means to circumvent access
use such content where to do so would be considered a criminal or statutory offence in any jurisdiction, or gives rise to civil liability, or is
falsely or misleadingly imply or suggest endorsement, approval , sponsorship, or association unless explicitly agreed to by Springer Nature in
use bots or other automated methods to access the content or redirect messages
override any security feature or exclusionary protocol; or
share the content in order to create substitute for Springer Nature products or services or a systematic database of Springer Nature journal
In line with the restriction against commercial use, Springer Nature does not permit the creation of a product or service that creates revenue,
royalties, rent or income from our content or its inclusion as part of a paid for service or for other commercial gain. Springer Nature journal
content cannot be used for inter-library loans and librarians may not upload Springer Nature journal content on a large scale into their, or any
other, institutional repository.
content on this website and may remove it or features or functionality at our sole discretion, at any time with or without notice. Springer Nature
may revoke this licence to you at any time and remove access to any copies of the Springer Nature journal content which have been saved.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, Springer Nature makes no warranties, representations or guarantees to Users, either express or implied
with respect to the Springer nature journal content and all parties disclaim and waive any implied warranties or warranties imposed by law,
including merchantability or fitness for any particular purpose.
Please note that these rights do not automatically extend to content, data or other material published by Springer Nature that may be licensed
from third parties.
If you would like to use or distribute our Springer Nature journal content to a wider audience or on a regular basis or in any other manner not
expressly permitted by these Terms, please contact Springer Nature at