Ecological imaginaries of Romantic and post-apocalyptic ruins: Representing the wild and pollution versus modern artificialization
Romantic and then post-apocalyptic representations of ruins are privileged objects for the environmental humanities insofar as they reveal the ambiguity of the relationship between modernity and nature. Produced by a modernity dominated by the attempt to artificialize the world, these works present other worlds dominated by non-humans such as climate, geology, plants, and animals. Formally, these works present them in space-times situated before and after modernity. However, they are exhibited today. This confrontation makes perceptible the idea of a conflict in which nature and culture seek to govern each other. The comparison of Romantic and post-apocalyptic representations leads us to consider that it is in fact played out between three instances: to the cultural artificial and the natural wild, we must add another non-artificial reality. This may be designated as pollution. It opposes the artificial without being a form of wild nature: it is the result of a dialectic between the wild and the artificial without reducing itself to a composition of the two. We must make room for this hybrid in the way we look at ecology.