ArticlePDF Available

Beynen AC, 2020. Diet and grass eating in dogs

Authors:

Abstract

Diet and grass eating in dogs Do dogs eat grass because they have a dietary deficiency? Based on three arguments, the answer to that commonly asked question (1) is no. For one, a deficiency of any nutrient is highly unlikely in grass-eating dogs fed on commercial, complete diets. Secondly, if a nutrient deficiency would inspire grass eating, the low bodily status of the nutrient in question somehow connects with grass as replenisher and directs its selection and consumption. So far, these capabilities have not been shown in dogs. Thirdly, dogs fed a fiber-deficient diet did not engage in eating fresh grass more frequently than did their counterparts fed the same diet, but with alfalfa meal as fiber source. In a questionnaire-based study, 71 (11%) out of 626 owners stated that their dogs never ate grass or other green plants (2). A web-based survey showed that 1068 (68%) out of 1571 plant-eating dogs ingested plants on a daily or weekly basis (3, Note 1). In 79% of those 1571 dogs, grass was the most frequently eaten plant. Plant-eating frequency (˂ 1 or ≥ 1/week) was unassociated with diet type: the frequencies were similar in dogs fed either commercial kibbled and/or canned food (n =1245) or home-cooked or raw food (n =326). As mentioned, fiber deficiency may not increase grass eating. Contrarily, an experimental diet did affect grass eating: excessive intake of a non-digestible carbohydrate had a diminishing effect. For the 1571 plant-eating dogs, 8% of their owners frequently noticed signs of illness before plant eating, while 23% frequently saw their pets vomit afterward (3). These outcomes indicate that overt illness is a minor correlate of grass eating and that vomiting is not a fixed consequence (Note 2). Another question that dog owners may put to veterinarians (1)-Do dogs eat grass to induce vomiting because they are sick?-cannot be answered, but grass eating mostly is not followed by vomiting (Note 3). Plant eating likely serves a biological purpose, but so far the interpretation is subject of speculation (1). Canine grass eaters may ingest 0 to 30 blades of grass per day, or 0 to 2 g of grass (= 0.32 g of dehydrated grass, Note 4). Multiple, commercial dry dog foods contain alfalfa meal derived from the green, leguminous alfalfa plant. The meal consists of dried, chopped, short-stem and leaf-rich alfalfa. A 20-kg dog may consume 12 g dried alfalfa (about 60 g fresh stems with leaves) per day when fed on a dry food containing 4% alfalfa meal (Note 5). That level of alfalfa inclusion is safe and contributes significantly to the amount of crude fiber in the diet. Diverging health benefits are attributed to alfalfa in dog food (Note 6), but the assertions remain unproven.
Bonny Canteen 2020; 1: 89-94.
Anton C. Beynen
Diet and grass eating in dogs
Do dogs eat grass because they have a dietary deficiency? Based on three arguments, the answer
to that commonly asked question (1) is no. For one, a deficiency of any nutrient is highly unlikely in
grass-eating dogs fed on commercial, complete diets. Secondly, if a nutrient deficiency would
inspire grass eating, the low bodily status of the nutrient in question somehow connects with grass
as replenisher and directs its selection and consumption. So far, these capabilities have not been
shown in dogs. Thirdly, dogs fed a fiber-deficient diet did not engage in eating fresh grass more
frequently than did their counterparts fed the same diet, but with alfalfa meal as fiber source.
In a questionnaire-based study, 71 (11%) out of 626 owners stated that their dogs never ate grass
or other green plants (2). A web-based survey showed that 1068 (68%) out of 1571 plant-eating
dogs ingested plants on a daily or weekly basis (3, Note 1). In 79% of those 1571 dogs, grass was
the most frequently eaten plant. Plant-eating frequency (˂ 1 or ≥ 1/week) was unassociated with
diet type: the frequencies were similar in dogs fed either commercial kibbled and/or canned food
(n =1245) or home-cooked or raw food (n =326). As mentioned, fiber deficiency may not increase
grass eating. Contrarily, an experimental diet did affect grass eating: excessive intake of a non-
digestible carbohydrate had a diminishing effect.
For the 1571 plant-eating dogs, 8% of their owners frequently noticed signs of illness before plant
eating, while 23% frequently saw their pets vomit afterward (3). These outcomes indicate that
overt illness is a minor correlate of grass eating and that vomiting is not a fixed consequence (Note
2). Another question that dog owners may put to veterinarians (1) Do dogs eat grass to induce
vomiting because they are sick? cannot be answered, but grass eating mostly is not followed by
vomiting (Note 3). Plant eating likely serves a biological purpose, but so far the interpretation is
subject of speculation (1).
Canine grass eaters may ingest 0 to 30 blades of grass per day, or 0 to 2 g of grass (= 0.32 g of
dehydrated grass, Note 4). Multiple, commercial dry dog foods contain alfalfa meal derived from
the green, leguminous alfalfa plant. The meal consists of dried, chopped, short-stem and leaf-rich
alfalfa. A 20-kg dog may consume 12 g dried alfalfa (about 60 g fresh stems with leaves) per day
when fed on a dry food containing 4% alfalfa meal (Note 5). That level of alfalfa inclusion is safe
and contributes significantly to the amount of crude fiber in the diet. Diverging health benefits are
attributed to alfalfa in dog food (Note 6), but the assertions remain unproven.
Grass-eating pattern
In healthy, adult kennel dogs (n =12), known to eat grass, grass-eating behavior was studied in a
research facility (4). Compatible groups (n =3) were presented with two pots of both kikuyu (P.
clandestinum) and couch grass (C. dactylon), and observed during 10-min sessions around 9 and 12
am and 3 pm for six days. Water was freely available. On two consecutive days, during one and the
same of the three daily sessions, the dogs received a meal of commercial dry food. In conformity
with a Latin square, two groups were observed before the meal and two groups afterwards.
All dogs readily ate grass as they did in their home-kennel environment. There was no clear
difference in preference between couch and kikuyu grass. Before their kibble meal, the dogs spent
more time eating grass and had more grass eating events than after the meal: on average 2.7 versus
0.5 min and 6.7 versus 2.0 events per dog. The authors (4) suggested that satiety may diminish grass
eating. Across all 12 dogs and all 18 testing sessions, there were five vomiting events, involving three
dogs, for a total of 709 grass-eating events.
Case report
An 11-year-old dog displayed problematic plant-eating behavior for 7 years (5). Every day, the dog
ate grass during its outside walk or plants grown in house. Before or after, behavior was normal,
except for invariable vomiting afterwards. Dog’s feces was somewhat soft. Physical and clinical-
chemical examinations did not reveal abnormalities.
The feeding of a hypoallergenic, hydrolysed-protein-based diet for 8 weeks left plant-eating behavior
unchanged. Then, the dog was put on a high-fiber diet: a dry prescription food containing 15.3%
crude fiber plus added cooked or raw grains and vegetables. Within three days, plant eating and
vomiting had stopped. As expected, both fecal firmness and bulk were increased. Thirteen months
later, the dog was still off plant eating.
Alfalfa study
A study has tested the hypothesis that shortage of fiber stimulates grass eating (2). According to an
incompletely-balanced Latin square design (Note 7), 11 adult dogs were fed a fiber-free diet without
or with alfalfa meal. The feeding periods lasted 21 days. Dogs were housed individually in a shared
room, had water ad libitum and were administered their meal at 5 pm. Each day, from 6 to 7.30 am,
the dogs were brought together in a courtyard and had free access to fresh grass sods. From a
position invisible to the dogs, grass-eating behavior of the dogs was watched and recorded.
The control diet was based on whole-egg powder and cooking oil (Note 8). The test diet was
composed of 90% control diet and 10% alfalfa meal. The proximate composition of the control/test
diet was 96.9/96.1% dry matter, 23.5/23.0% protein, 63.2/58.0% fat, 0/2.1% fiber and 9.0/8.9% ash.
All dogs engaged in grass eating, but not daily. The average number of sessions during which grass
was eaten (out of 21 sessions per diet) was almost identical for both diets: 13.0 and 13.8 sessions
per dog (Note 9). Thus, adding alfalfa fiber to a fiber-free diet did not reduce grass eating.
FOS study
The hypothesis that gastrointestinal stress promotes grass eating, was put to the test through
feeding dogs a diet with a very-high level of fructooligosaccharides (FOS, Note 10). In a study (6) with
A1-B1-A2-B2 design and periods of 7-2-5-2 days, 12 adult dogs were fed diets A (control) and B (test).
The control diet consisted of an extruded and canned diet in a 97:3 energy ratio. To make the test
diet, FOS (inulin) was mixed with the wet-food portion so that the inclusion was 10% of total dietary
dry matter.
For 10 minutes per day, as from 10 am, during the B periods and during the last two days of the A
periods, pairs of dogs were presented with one pot each of couch (C. dactylon) and kikuyu (P.
clandestinum) grasses. Grass-eating behavior was recorded. The dogs were given their meal once
daily, between 3 and 5 pm.
Feces consistency was normal for the control diet, but FOS feeding caused loose, watery feces. The
dogs showed a strong preference for kikuyu versus couch grass. Average grass-eating events and
duration were higher for the control diet compared with the FOS diet: 4.6 versus 3.1 events and 2.7
versus 1.7 min. The results indicate that mild, FOS-induced diarrhea did not coexist with enhanced
grass eating. Stated differently, in some way the FOS preparation discouraged grass eating.
Alfalfa in dog food
Alfalfa (Medicago sativa), also called lucerne, may be used for grazing, pelleting, hay and silage, and
hence for feeding cattle and horses. Young plants are typified by trifoliate leaves. In maturity, the
leaves become elongated and clusters of small purple flowers appear. Fresh, young alfalfa contains
about 20% dry matter. Artificially- or sun-dried alfalfa holds about 90% dry matter, 10-19% crude
protein, 2-3% crude fat, 23-30% crude fiber, 9-12% ash, 0.9-1.6% calcium and 0.2-0.3% phosphorus.
In 1935 (7) and 1942 (8), the Alabama Agricultural Experiment Station released bulletins on practical
dog feeding. The so-called Auburn Ration I (Note 11), which was corn-based and contained 2%
alfalfa-leaf meal, was “especially recommended for brood bitches where reproduction and raising
pups is the main consideration” (8). In 1965 (9), it was reported that a corn-based diet containing 5%
alfalfa meal (Note 12) was adequate for growth, maintenance, reproduction and lactation in dogs.
Note 1
The inclusion criteria of the survey responses were as follows (3): only those surveys in which dog
owners stated that they spent at least 6 h per day in the company of their dogs and had observed
plant eating on at least 10 occasions during the time they owned their dog were included. Of 3340
surveys returned, 1571 (47%) met the inclusion criteria.
Note 2
In a questionnaire-based study (2), owners (n =555) of grass-eating dogs were asked about
remarkable observations before grass eating. The responses were none (n =472), hungriness (n =45),
consumption of spoiled food (n =20) and overeating (n =18). With regard to vomiting after grass
eating, the responses were no (n =230), yes (n =200) and sometimes (n =125).
Note 3
An article is entitled “Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers.: a self-treatment grass for dogs” (10). That article is
at odds with the observations (2, 3) that grass eating mostly is not followed by vomiting. However,
the authors observed in India that the grass parts in dogs’ vomitus matched with Cynodon dactylon,
also called couch grass or dog grass. The paper speculates how couch grass may uniquely induce
vomiting in dogs. In two studies on grass-eating behavior (4, 6), dogs were given access to both
couch and kikuyu grass (P. clandestinum) grass.
Note 4
Some owners of grass-eating dogs reported that their dogs repeatedly had episodes with a strikingly
great desire for grass eating (2). During those circumstances, the dogs were said to ingest 20 to 30
blades of grass per day. Blades of perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) with average length of 10.8
cm had an oven-dry weight of 12.4 mg (11). The dry weight of 30 blades is 372 mg, which
corresponds with 2325 mg fresh weight, or over 2 g. Fresh grass contains about 16% dry matter.
Note 5
According to the manufacturer of Canine Caviar dog foods, the amount of sun-cured alfalfa is less
than 5% in each diet (a).
The ingredient list of the dry food Canine Caviar Open Meadow reads as follows (b): Dehydrated
Lamb, Pearl Millet, Lamb Fat (preserved with mixed tocopherols), Coconut, Sun-Cured Alfalfa,
Coconut Oil, Sun-Cured Kelp, Dried Lactobacillus Acidophilus Fermentation Product, Sodium
Chloride, Lecithin, Choline Chloride, FOS or Fructooligosaccharide (prebiotic), Fenugreek,
Peppermint, Taurine, Zinc Proteinate, Papaya, Rose Hips, Yucca Schidigera Extract, Anise Oil, Thyme
Oil, Manganese Proteinate, Beta-Carotene, Vitamin D3 Supplement, Biotin, Selenium, Riboflavin,
Thiamine Mononitrate, Pyridoxine Hydrochloride, Vitamin B12 Supplement, Folic Acid.
a. https://blog.caninecaviar.com/2019/09/benefits-of-alfalfa-for-dogs
b. https://www.caninecaviar.com/product/open-meadow/
Note 6
The benefits of alfalfa for dogs have been described as nutrient dense/nutritional powerhouse (a, c,
e, f, g), promoting oral and kidney health (a, g), improving appetite (a), supplying complex
carbohydrates (d), relieving arthritis pain (e, g) and preventing cancer (g). Alfalfa in dog food has
been called a controversial ingredient as it is commonly associated with horse feed (h).
c. https://www.natureslogic.com/2016/07/06/alfalfa-natures-logic-foods/
d. https://krisers.com/products/zignature-limited-ingredient-lamb-formula-dry-dog-food
e. https://woofwhiskers.com/crave-dog-food-review
f. http://slimdoggy.com/dog-food-ingredients-a-to-z-alfalfa/
g. https://www.dogsnaturallymagazine.com/alfalfa-for-dogs/
h. https://puplore.com/canidae-dog-food-reviews/
Note 7
The study was designed as Latin square with six dogs and two feeding periods (2). During grass-
eating sessions in the second period, two dogs proved to be unsuitable due to pack-order fights and
were removed. One dog was replaced. Data for the control and test diet are based on 5 and 6 dogs
(Note 9).
Note 8
The control diet (2) consisted of 49.26% whole-egg powder, 44.50% cooking oil, 2.77% dicalcium
phosphate dehydrate, 0.54% calcium carbonate, 1.21% sodium chloride and 1.72% potassium
sulfate.
Note 9
The number of sessions during which the individual dogs ate grass were 17-11-10-21-6 (n = 5) for the
control diet and 18-12-13-20-10-10 (n =6) for the test diet (2). The total number of sessions was 21.
Note 10
FOS (fructo-oligosaccharides) refers to a group of carbohydrates consisting of bonded fructose units
(12). Inulins, which are extracted from chicory root, have an α(1-2)-linked glucose end unit.
McKenzie et al. (6) used inulin. It has been shown earlier that mixing inulin into dogs’ food, at 7% of
dietary dry matter, increased wet feces quantity by 46% and reduced apparent protein digestibility
by 2.6% units (13). The extra feces contained 89% moisture, pointing to an osmotic effect of colonic
solutes generated by enhanced bacterial activity. Inulin acts as microbial substrate, thereby
expanding fecal, bacterial mass, including protein.
Note 11
The Auburn I dog ration (7) consisted of 35% yellow corn meal, 10% wheat bran, 20% wheat
middlings, 10% meat scraps (55-60% protein), 10% fish meal (55-60% protein), 10% skim milk
powder or dried butter milk, 2% alfalfa meal or alfalfa leaf meal, 2% bone meal, 1% salt.
Note 12
The diet consisted of 58% ground yellow corn, 32% soybean oil meal, 5% alfalfa meal, 2% salt
mixture and 3% cottonseed oil. One g of irradiated yeast, 2.0 g niacin and 20 µg crystalline vitamin
B12 were added per kg diet (9). Each animal was given 10 drops of halibut liver oil weekly. The salt
mixture was composed of 50% CaCO3, 24% NaCl, 24% CaHPO4, 1% MgO, 0.95% MnSO4 and 0.05%
KI.
Note 13
Estrogenic activity in alfalfa meal may be about 15 times higher than that in soybean meal (14). The
estrogenic activity in soy-containing petfoods appears to be safe, but it can influence hormonal
systems in dogs and cats (15).
Note 14
MFiber is advertised as a petfood ingredient (i, j). MFiber is a fiber ingredient made from Miscanthus
giganteus, a C4 grass grown for its fiber content. In a dog digestibility trial, Miscanthus grass
(presumably being the same as MFiber) has been compared with cellulose and beet pulp (16).
MFiber is a processed product using the lignified plant as starting material (I, j). If the terms MFiber
and Miscanthus grass are used interchangeably, then the word grass is somewhat misleading.
i. https://mfiber.net/
j. https://mfiber.net/renew-biomass-acquires-mfa-oil-biomass-assets/
Note 15
A research paper advances the judgment that dogs are widely exposed to commonly used lawn
chemicals and that these chemicals are present in their urine, possibly having negative health effects
(17).
Note 16
Based on an experiment, it has been suggested that grass-eating behavior in domestic dogs is innate
and that the mother’s eating habits further facilitate the puppies’ grass eating (18).
Literature
1. Hart BL. Why do dogs and cats eat grass? Vet Med 2008; December: 648-649.
2. Roose U. Erhebungen zum Grasfressen beim Hund. Inaugural-Dissertation, Tierärtzliche
Hochschule Hannover, 1982.
3. Sueda KLC, Hart BL, Davis Cliff K. Characterisation of plant eating in dogs. Appl Anim Behav 2008;
111: 120-132.
4. Bjone SJ, Brown WY, Price IR. Grass eating patterns in the domestic dog, Canis familiaris. Rec Adv
Anim Nutr Austr 2007; 16: 45-49.
5. Kang B-T, Jung D-I, Yoo J-H, Park C, Woo E-J, Park H-E. A high fiber diet responsive case in a Poodle
dog with long-term plant eating behavior. J Vet Med Sci 2007; 69: 779-782.
6. McKenzie SJ, Brown WY, Price IR. Reduction in grass eating behaviours in the domestic dog, Canis
familiaris, in response to a mild gastrointestinal disturbance. Appl Anim Behav 2010; 123: 51-55.
7. Salmon WD. Dog-feeding suggestions. Agricultural Experiment Station of the Alabama Polytechnic
Institute. Leaflet No 13, January 1935.
8. Koehn CJ. Practical dog feeding. Agricultural Experiment Station of the Alabama Polytechnic
Institute. Bulletin 251, January 1942.
9. Campbell JE, Phillips PH. Reproduction studies with dogs. I. Effect of a corn-soybean meal-alfalfa
diet. J Nutr 1952; 47: 621-629.
10. Kandwal MK, Sharma ML. Conydon dactylon (L.) Pers.: a self-treatment grass for dogs. Current Sci
2011; 101: 619-621.
11. Simpson D, Wilman D, Adams WA. Response of white clover and grass to applications of
potassium and nitrogen on a potassium-deficient hill soil. J Agric Sci Camb 1988; 110: 159-167.
12. Beynen AC. FOS in dog food. Creature Companion 2019; July: 40, 42.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/334132028_Beynen_AC_2019_FOS_in_dog_food
13. Diez M, Hornick JL, Baldwin P, Van Eenaeme C, Istasse L. The influence of sugar-beet fibre, guar
gum and inulin on nutrient digestibility, water consumption and plasma metabolites in healthy
Beagle dogs. Res Vet Sci 1988; 64: 91-96.
14. Kato H, Iwata T, Katsu Y, Watanabe H, Ohta Y, Iguchi T. Evaluation of estrogenic activity in diets
for experimental animals using in vitro assay. J Agric Food Chem 2004; 52: 1410-1414.
15. Beynen AC. Soyestrogens in petfood. Creature Companion 2017; November: 32-33.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321005866_Beynen_AC_2017_Soyestrogens_in_petfood
16. Donadelli RA, Aldrich CG. The effects on nutrient utilization and stool quality of Beagle dogs fed
diets with beet pulp, cellulose, and Miscanthus grass. J Anim Sci 2019; 4134-4139.
doi:10.1093/jas/skz265
17. Knapp DW, Peer WA, Conteh A, Diggs AR, Cooper BR, Glickman NW, Bonney PL, Stewart JC,
Glickman LT, Murphy AS. Detection of herbicides in the urine op pet dogs following home lawn
chemical application. Sci Tot Environ 2013; 456-457: 34-41.
18. Bjone SJ, Brown WY, Price IR. Maternal influence on grass eating in puppies. J Vet Behav 2009; 4:
97-98.
... Some dry dog foods in the market place contain about 4% dried alfalfa in the dry matter (7). Alfalfa has about 12 % ash in its dry matter. ...
Article
Full-text available
Pyrraline in petfood Pyrraline (Pyr) may be seen as the product of heat-induced reactions between a sugar, such as glucose, and the amino acid lysine. Pyr may be formed during thermal processing of foods, including petfoods (cf. Note 1). Data on Pyr analyses in commercial dog and cat foods were not found. Using analysed Pyr contents in proxy ingredients, the maximum level of Pyr in petfood was put at 93 mg/kg dietary dry matter, or per kg of the food's residue after removal of its moisture. A paper communicates that dogs excrete Pyr in urine, but further data on Pyr metabolism in dogs are unavailable. For cats, there appears to be no information whatsoever. As based on a study in humans, it can be concluded that ingested Pyr can cross the intestinal wall. That study showed that ingested Pyr ends up in urine in unchanged, but excretion of metabolites cannot be excluded. Pyr is most probably synthesized by bodily tissues, but solid proof seems unavailable (cf. Note 1). When it comes to health of dogs, the estimated, maximum level of Pyr in petfood may not induce adverse effects within a few months, but long-term toxicity cannot be excluded. That statement is based on short-term studies in dogs fed diets with excess of beet pulp, which is high in Pyr. The short-and long-term impact of dietary Pyr on feline health cannot be determined. It is impossible to pass judgment as to the safety or danger of Pyr in petfood (cf. Note 2). More specifically, in the absence of long-term, rodent feeding studies, it remains unpredictable whether chronic consumption of Pyr, as a component of industrially and home-made formulas, entails a health risk in dogs and cats. Pyr analyses in petfood would be instructive, but ascertainments of the compound's long-term, no-toxic-effect-level in dogs and cats are required also. Pyrraline Pyrraline (Pyr, C12H18N2O4) can be described as a pyrrole ring (C4H5N) with an aldehyde (-CHO) and hydroxymethyl (-CH2OH) group that are singly attached to the carbons neighboring the ring's nitrogen atom. That nitrogen atom may be seen as derived from the epsilon amino group of lysine (C6H14N2O2, cf. Note 1), while the atom also retained the rest of the amino acid's structure. In 1970, Jurg and Tatum (1) reported that a Pyr-like compound emerged in a mixture of D-glucose, methylamine and acetic in water, after refluxing for two hours on a steam bath. The Pyr-like reaction product is 5-hydroxymethyl-1-methylpyrrole-2-carboxaldehyde. The nitrogen atom of the product's pyrrole ring has a methyl group. At that location, Pyr has a lysine chain without epsilon amino group. In 1980, Nakayama et al. (2) described that Pyr (Ɛ-(2-formyl-5-hydroxymethyl-pyrrol-I-yl)-L-norleucine) was formed when a mixture of D-glucose and L-Iysine monohydrochloride in water was refluxed at 105 o C for 6 hours. Pyr was isolated from the brown solution, which was substantiated by mass and proton-magnetic-resonance spectroscopy (cf. Note 3). Formation and pathway
Article
Full-text available
Dogs can benefit from dietary fibers. Traditionally, cellulose and beet pulp have been used by pet food companies as insoluble and soluble fiber sources. Miscanthus grass is a novel fiber ingredient made from Miscanthus giganteus, a C4 grass produced for its fiber content, but it has not been evaluated for dogs. The objectives of this study were to determine the effects of different fiber sources on nutrient utilization and stool consistency by dogs. Twelve Beagle dogs were fed three dietary treatments varying in their fiber sources (beet pulp - BP, cellulose - CE, Miscanthus grass - MG). Diets were fed for a 14-d period (9 d adaptation), fecal samples were collected (5 d total fecal collection) and scored. Nutrient digestibility was estimated using total fecal collection (TFC). Dogs fed BP diet had softer stools than dogs fed CE and MG (3.15 vs. 3.68 and 3.64, respectively). Wet fecal output was higher for dogs fed CE compared to MG, with dogs fed BP having the lowest values (254.3 g vs. 241.6 g vs. 208.5 g, respectively). Both digestibility methods ranked dietary treatments similarly. Dogs fed CE and MG had lower dry matter (DM) digestibility than dogs fed BP (P < 0.05), dogs fed BP had lower crude protein (CP) digestibility compared to dogs fed MG and CE (81.4% vs. 85.5% and 85.8%, respectively). In conclusion, Miscanthus grass could be used as an alternative fiber source to cellulose.
Article
Full-text available
Article
Full-text available
Very little is known about grass eating behaviour in the domestic dog, Canis familiaris. This study is the first to investigate grass eating in dogs in a controlled experiment, and attempts to provide an initial understanding of this behaviour by describing the pattern of grass eating during the day and the relationship between grass eating and the ingestion of food. Twelve dogs were presented with both kikuyu and couch grass three times daily for 6 d and grass eating behaviours were observed using an all-occurrences sampling method. The results of this study suggest that grass eating is influenced by satiety and time of day. Dogs spent more time eating grass before ingestion of their kibble meal than after, and the time spent eating grass decreased throughout the day. Grass may be seen as a food source, as the subjects were less likely to eat grass when they were satiated. Couch and kikuyu grasses were equally preferred. We conclude that grass eating is a normal and common behaviour, as all dogs in this study were in good health and readily ate grass. As such, grass-eating should not be seen as a problematic behaviour for most dogs or as indicative of illness.
Article
Grass eating behaviour in the domestic dog may be related to gastrointestinal distress. To explore this theory, the current study observed grass eating behaviours in dogs fed a standard diet with and without supplementation of a fructo-oligosaccharide (FOS). The FOS diet temporarily induced loose, watery stools to simulate a mild gastrointestinal disturbance. During both FOS Diet and Standard Diet periods, dogs were presented with couch (Cynodon dactylon) and kikuyu (Pennisetum clandestinum) grasses, and the time spent eating grass and the number of grass eating and vomiting events was recorded. Our study found that dogs spent significantly more time eating grass when fed the standard diet and producing normal stools than when they were fed the FOS diet and producing loose stools, suggesting that dogs do not use grass to self-medicate a diarrhoeal gastrointestinal disturbance. However, this does not preclude that other forms of gastrointestinal disturbance may be self-medicated by grass eating behaviours. Importantly, dogs did not use grass as an emetic, as there were only two vomiting events and 374 grass eating events observed. Alternatively, the reduction in grass eating may be attributable to a feeling of satiety caused by the fermentation of FOS. For further clarity, future research should examine the effect of other gastrointestinal disturbances, such as constipation (hard, dry stools) or nausea, on grass eating behaviour in the domestic dog.
Article
All combinations of four levels of potassium and two of nitrogen were applied in each of 2 years to a hill sward on a brown podzolic soil with an 8 cm peaty surface horizon anda very low level of extractable K. The sward had been surface-sown 11 years before with white clover ( Trifolium repens L.) and perennial ryegrass ( Lolium perenne L.). During the course of the experiment, harvesting was by cutting, with an average interval between cuts of 5 weeks. The previous management had been sheep grazing. The proportion of clover in harvested herbage was increased by applied K and reduced by applied N. The clover grew strongly in the 1st year of cutting management where K, but no N, was applied, but there was much less clover in the 2nd year on all plots. The concentration of K in both clover and grass was greatly increased by applied K, but only the clover responded strongly in terms of extra herbage produced. This suggests that grass growth was N-limited, whereas the clover had sufficient N from symbiotic fixation. Applied K increased the size and weight of clover leaves, the rate of extension of the stolon main axis, and the number and length of stolon branches, but did not affect the rate of emergence of leaves on the stolon main axis. Applied N had a generally negative effect on the aspects of clover growth and morphology which were measured. The length and weight per ryegrass leaf blade were generally slightly increased by both applied K and applied N.
Article
The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effects of three fibres (sugar-beet fibre, guar gum and inulin) incorporated in the basal diet of healthy dogs at 7 per cent of dry matter (DM). Parameters examined included stool output, water consumption, nutrient digestibility and fasting and postprandial plasma metabolites. All fibres increased wet faecal output; an increase in faecal DM output being observed with sugar-beet fibre only. Sugar-beet fibre and inulin increased daily water consumption. Sugar-beet fibre and guar gum decreased DM digestibility. The three fibres diminished organic matter and crude protein digestibility while ether extract digestibility was decreased by guar gum and inulin. Guar gum induced lower postprandial insulin, alpha-amino-nitrogen and urea plasma concentrations. Guar gum also lowered fasting cholesterolaemia. Sugar-beet fibre and inulin showed no metabolic effects. These physiological properties suggest that guar gum would be a suitable ingredient for dietary therapy of chronic diseases such as diabetes mellitus or hyperlipidaemia in the dog.
Article
We used a modified yeast-based human estrogen receptor alpha (ER alpha) bioassay to determine the estrogenic activity in 22 kinds of diets for experimental animals. The estrogenic activity of each diet was reevaluated by comparison with a calibration curve of 17 beta-estradiol. Almost all of the diets had estrogenic activity. The diets for rabbits and guinea pigs had the highest estrogenic activity compared to any other diets, including those for rats and mice. Estrogenic activity was found in dried skim milk, fishmeal, soybean meal, and alfalfa meal. In the NIH-07 diet opened for the ingredients, estrogenic activity was nearly all derived from the alfalfa meal. Multiple assays were performed to evaluate potential seasonal variations in the estrogenic potency in the raw materials of the rat and mouse diets. We found that the estrogenic activity in these raw materials changed throughout the year.