Article

What is the opposite of speciesism? On relational care ethics and illustrating multi-species-isms

Authors:
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the author.

Abstract

Purpose This paper articulates a counter-concept to the notion of speciesism with the aim to encourage thinking beyond critique, towards imagining what non-speciesist worlds can actually look like. Design/methodology/approach By using the concept of “multi-species-isms” (or “multispecies”, as a simpler adjective), and linking it to feminist and relational ethics of “care”, the paper seeks to unite perspectives from both Critical Animal Studies as well as feminist, posthumanist theories. Already existing traces of multi-species-isms that exemplify different forms of multispecies care are visualised through annotated illustrations that accompany the text. These traces offer a cue for negotiating multispecies worlds without attempting to define their content in all too definite forms. Findings Rather than focusing on critiquing oppressive structures, the paper contributes narratives of multispecies worlds that inspire further imagination towards the positive ingredients of such worlds and show more concretely how multispecies care is practised in everyday life. Social implications These insights frame a starting point for a repertoire that shows the numerous ways in which multispecies relationships between humans and other animals are already given form. Originality/value By articulating the actual ingredients of multi-species-isms, rather than focusing on what they are not, the paper seeks to advance a move towards adding multispecies possibilities that can be especially helpful for those researchers, designers and activists concerned with imagining alternative futures.

No full-text available

Request Full-text Paper PDF

To read the full-text of this research,
you can request a copy directly from the author.

... In an orientation towards multispecies design, to avoid reproducing the speciesist status quo (and thereby reinforcing its oppressive dynamics), the world-making of other species has to be taken seriously, cared for, and responded to if we want to avoid silencing the other (cf. Westerlaken, 2020). In our multispecies design efforts that help us get closer to other animals and gain speculative insights into what it is like to be a horse or a goat, designers must not stop after finishing the design or documenting the artefact. ...
Article
Critical contemporary discourses on extinction, climate change and planetary boundaries are needed to counter and reject our current ways of living on this planet. But they often end badly. Therefore, we also need to tell the stories that create openings and generate more desirable alternatives. This paper contributes to the effort of resituating design as less anthropocentric and much more of a multispecies affair. Following scholars such as Donna Haraway, Timothy Morton, Anna Tsing and John Law, this text does so by unpacking the notion of ‘multispecies worlding’ for speculative design practices that involve other living entities. By carrying multiplicities into design processes and rethinking how other species can become a more deliberate part of our (re)worlding efforts, this text articulates the importance of advancing decolonial design aims to generate interspecies harmonies rather than reinforcing oppressive relations. The annotated illustrations and examples of multispecies design projects that appear in this paper involve an additional effort in identifying ‘big-enough’ stories and already existing multispecies design speculations. As such, this work offers merely one collection of enactments that can allow further worlding and further design work. Such a repertoire of speculative multispecies design work can thereby knot together different realities, from different actors, that can propose and embody other kinds of worlding relations between species. They thereby slowly but steadily break down existing grand narratives that seem all-explanatory to speculate about different ways in which humans and other species already make worlds together.
Conference Paper
Full-text available
In this exploratory paper, we advocate for a way to mitigate the anthropocentrism inherent in interaction-design methodologies. We propose to involve animals that live in anthropic environments as participants in design processes. The current relationships between animals and technology have an inevitable impact on their well-being and raise fundamental ethical questions concerning our design policies. Drawing from the work of Bruno Latour and Donna Haraway, we argue for a situated approach in which we reflect upon concrete design contexts. We explore the notion of becoming with as a conceptual framework for the intuitive and bodily understanding that takes place between humans and animals when they encounter one-another in shared contexts. Adopting a research through design approach, we further explore this notion by reflecting upon two different participatory design projects with two dogs. We found these reflections to offer valuable perspectives for designers to analyse and discuss their iterative processes.
Book
Full-text available
“You are about to enter a new genre, that of scientific fables, by which I don’t mean science fiction, or false stories about science, but, on the contrary, true ways of understanding how difficult it is to figure out what animals are up to.” -Bruno Latour, form the Foreword Is it all right to urinate in front of animals? What does it mean when a monkey throws its feces at you? Do apes really know how to ape? Do animals form same-sex relations? Are they the new celebrities of the twenty-first century? This book poses twenty-six such questions that stretch our preconceived ideas about what animals do, what they think about, and what they want. In a delightful abecedarium of twenty-six chapters, Vinciane Despret argues that behaviors we identify as separating humans from animals do not actually properly belong to humans. She does so by exploring incredible and often funny adventures about animals and their involvements with researchers, farmers, zookeepers, handlers, and other human beings. Do animals have a sense of humor? In reading these stories it is evident that they do seem to take perverse pleasure in creating scenarios that unsettle even the greatest of experts, who in turn devise newer and riskier hypotheses that invariably lead them to conclude that animals are not nearly as dumb as previously thought. These deftly translated accounts oblige us, along the way, to engage in both ethology and philosophy. Combining serious scholarship with humor that will resonate with anyone, this book-with a foreword by noted French philosopher, anthropologist, and sociologist of science Bruno Latour-is a must not only for specialists but also for general readers, including dog owners, who will never look at their canine companions the same way again. © 2016 by the Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.
Article
Full-text available
In spite of the considerable literature nowadays existing on the issue of the moral exclusion of nonhuman animals, there is still work to be done concerning the characterization of the conceptual framework with which this question can be appraised. This paper intends to tackle this task. It starts by defining speciesism as the unjustified disadvantageous consideration or treatment of those who are not classified as belonging to a certain species. It then clarifies some common misunderstandings concerning what this means. Next, it rejects the idea that there are different kinds of speciesism. Such an idea may result from confusion because there are (1) different ways in which speciesism can be defended; and (2) different speciesist positions, that is, different positions that assume speciesism among their premises. Depending on whether or not these views assume other criteria for moral consideration apart from speciesism, they can be combined or simple speciesist positions. But speciesism remains in all cases the same idea. Finally, the paper examines the concept of anthropocentrism, the disadvantageous treatment or consideration of those who are not members of the human species. This notion must be conceptually distinguished from speciesism and from misothery (aversion to nonhuman animals). Anthropocentrism is shown to be refuted because it either commits a petitio principia fallacy or it falls prey to two arguments: the argument from species overlap (widely but misleadingly known as “argument from marginal cases”) and the argument from relevance. This rebuttal identifies anthropocentrism as a speciesist view. KeywordsAnthropocentrism-Argument from Relevance-Argument from Species Overlap-Discrimination-Misothery-Speciesism
Article
Full-text available
During the next 50 years, which is likely to be the final period of rapid agricultural expansion, demand for food by a wealthier and 50% larger global population will be a major driver of global environmental change. Should past dependences of the global environmental impacts of agriculture on human population and consumption continue, 10(9) hectares of natural ecosystems would be converted to agriculture by 2050. This would be accompanied by 2.4- to 2.7-fold increases in nitrogen- and phosphorus-driven eutrophication of terrestrial, freshwater, and near-shore marine ecosystems, and comparable increases in pesticide use. This eutrophication and habitat destruction would cause unprecedented ecosystem simplification, loss of ecosystem services, and species extinctions. Significant scientific advances and regulatory, technological, and policy changes are needed to control the environmental impacts of agricultural expansion.
Chapter
Chapter
This chapter delivers a critical view of modern animal welfarism and Green ideology as important vehicles for the reproduction of speciesism. Starting in the abolitionist animal rights critique of Gary L. Francione and Joan Dunayer, and employing the analytic framework of post-Marxist discourse theory, the argument is made for an understanding of speciesism as conditioned by dominant discourses of the human-animal relationship. The discursive meaning-systems of animal welfarism and Green thought are shown to sustain such speciesist hegemony in several ways. Specifically, it is revealed how these ideologies routinely feed into the "five faces of oppression" outlined by Iris Marion Young: exploitation, marginalization, powerlessness, cultural imperialism and violence.
Article
This essay is an historical exploration of the nexus between animals, agency, and class. More significantly, it seeks to place the agency of horses, cows, sheep, pigs, etc. into the process of historical writing. This essay is divided into three sections. The first is a critique of the current state of the historiography of animal-studies. The second, 'A Product of an Unspoken Negotiation,' considers how animals themselves have shaped their own lives and labors. The third, 'The Evolution of Vegetarianism and Animal-Rights,' explores how a class relationship developed between humans and other animals. Moreover, this section demonstrates how this solidarity then led to the creation of social change.
Article
Feminist theory needs both explanatory-diagnostic and anticipatory-utopian moments in order to be truly critical and truly feminist. However, the explanatory-diagnostic task of analyzing the workings of gendered power relations in all of their depth and complexity seems to undercut the very possibility of emancipation on which the anticipatory-utopian task relies. In this paper, I take this looming paradox as an invitation to rethink our understanding of emancipation and its relation to the anticipatory-utopian dimensions of critique, asking what conception of emancipation is compatible with a complex explanatory-diagnostic analysis of contemporary gender domination as it is intertwined and entangled with race, class, sexuality, and empire. I explore this question through an analysis of two specific debates in which the paradoxical relationship between power and emancipation emerges in particularly salient and seemingly intractable forms: debates over subjection and modernity. Drawing on the work of Michel Foucault, I argue that a negativistic conception of emancipation offers the best way for feminist critical theory to transform the paradox of power and emancipation into a productive tension that can fuel critique.
Article
Dans cet article, l'A se penche sur la theorie feministe de l'attention, soin, porte aux animaux non humains. L'A repond a une serie de critiques concernant cette theorie, en redefinit les grand traits pour proposer de mieux prendre en consideration le message emotionel que transmettent les meres a leurs enfants, et cesser l'exploitation des animaux sous toutes ses formes
Article
Formulated in the 1980s and gaining prominence in the early 1990s, by the end of that decade ecofeminism was critiqued as essentialist and effectively discarded. Fearing their scholarship would be contaminated by association with the term "ecofeminism," feminists working on the intersections of feminism and environmentalism thought it better to rename their approach. Thirty years later, current developments in allegedly new fields such as animal studies and naturalized epistemology are "discovering" theoretical perspectives on interspecies relations and standpoint theory that were developed by feminists and ecofeminists decades ago. What have we lost by jettisoning these earlier feminist and ecofeminist bodies of knowledge? Are there features of ecofeminism that can helpfully be retrieved, restoring an intellectual and activist history, and enriching current theorizing and activisms? By examining the historical foundations of ecofeminism from the 1980s onward, this article uncovers the roots of the antifeminist backlash against ecofeminism in the 1990s, peeling back the layers of feminist and environmentalist resistance to ecofeminism's analyses of the connections among racism, sexism, classism, colonialism, speciesism, and the environment. Recuperating ecofeminist insights of the past thirty years provides feminist foundations for current liberatory theories and activisms.
Article
Posthumanism and critical animal studies are grounded in different theoretical frameworks and have different orientations and agendas. The present essay works through some dimensions of posthumanist thought together with critical animal studies by exploring ‘the edges’ in certain points of contact between the fields and their material and metaphorical problems and possibilities. My main objective is to begin to develop some of the most productive dimensions of posthumanism in relation to critical animal studies in a call for a critical posthumanist approach to the messy knowledge forms and politics emerging from human/animal relationships by asking the question: Under what conditions does cross-contamination take place between the two fields, and to what effects? The essay proposes two different responses to dealing with issues exposed by the juxtaposition of posthumanism and critical animal studies, and argues that this juxtaposition also accommodates a potential to instigate unexpected processes of knowledge development in both fields.
Symbiogenesis, sympoiesis, and art science activisms for staying with the trouble
  • D Haraway
Haraway, D. (2017), "Symbiogenesis, sympoiesis, and art science activisms for staying with the trouble", in Tsing, A.L., Bubant, N., Gan, E. and Swanson, H.A. (Eds), Arts of Living on a Damaged Planet: Stories from the Anthropocene, Island Press, Washington, DC, pp. M25-M50.
The Feminist Care Tradition in Animal Ethics: A Reader
  • J Donovan
  • Adams Carol
Donovan, J. and Adams Carol, J. (Eds) (2007), The Feminist Care Tradition in Animal Ethics: A Reader, Columbia University Press, New York, NY.
Lexicon for an Anthropocene Unseen
  • A Galloway
Galloway, A. (2019), "Flock", in Howe, C. and Pandian, A. (Eds), Lexicon for an Anthropocene Unseen, Punctum Books, Brooklyn, NY, pp. 203-206.
Holobiont by birth: multilineage individuals as the concretion of cooperative processes
  • S F Gilbert
Gilbert, S.F. (2017), "Holobiont by birth: multilineage individuals as the concretion of cooperative processes", in Tsing, A.L., Bubant, N., Gan, E. and Swanson, H.A. (Eds), Arts of Living on a Damaged Planet: Stories from the Anthropocene, Island Press, Washington, DC, pp. M73-M89.
Becoming Animal: An Earthly Cosmology
  • D Abram
Abram, D. (2010), Becoming Animal: An Earthly Cosmology, Vintage Books, New York, NY.
What Comes after Entanglement?
  • E H Giraud
Giraud, E.H. (2019), What Comes after Entanglement?, Duke University Press, Durham, NC.
Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene
  • D Haraway
Haraway, D. (2016), Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene, Duke University Press, Durham, NC.
Humankind: Solidarity with Nonhuman People
  • T Morton
Morton, T. (2017), Humankind: Solidarity with Nonhuman People, Verso, London.
  • P Singer
Singer, P. (1975) (2009), Animal Liberation, HarperCollins Publishers, New York, NY.
The Dreaded Comparison: Human and Animal Slavery, Mirror Books
  • M Spiegel
Spiegel, M. (1996), The Dreaded Comparison: Human and Animal Slavery, Mirror Books, New York, NY.
Animal Slaughter Counter
The Vegan Calculator (2018), "Animal Slaughter Counter", available at: https://thevegancalculator. com/animal-slaughter/ (accessed 30 August 2019).
The Conception of Ahimsa in Indian Thought -According to Sanskrit Sources, Bharata Manisha
  • K Walli
Walli, K. (1974), The Conception of Ahimsa in Indian Thought -According to Sanskrit Sources, Bharata Manisha, Varanasi.