ArticlePDF Available

Effective Patient-Physician Communication - A Concise Review

Authors:

Abstract

Current medical care is heavily reliant on the use of evidence-based guidelines dealing with diagnosis and therapy. The burgeoning medical literature, easy availability of medical information in the social media and consumerism has increased the additional number of issues discussed during a patient physician meeting. Inability to satisfy the patient or their families due to poor communication skills of physicians remains an universal challenge all over the world. Poor patient physician communication decrease patient compliance to treatment strategies, poor patient satisfaction scores and on the extreme lead to violence directed to physicians. Most medical schools and residency programs have incorporated patient-physician's communication skills in their curriculum. Similar opportunities to improve communication skills are available for practicing physicians. There are numerous tools that can be readily incorporated to improve the quality of patient physician communication. Communicating remotely with patients in the new era of COVD-19 using telehealth technology needs development of new skills that can be easily taught. Every physician need to periodically assess their own communication skills, and seek out conferences and learning opportunities within their hospitals, state, national or international medical community to continue learning and practicing new communication skills.
Journal of The Association of Physicians of India Vol. 68 June 2020 53
Eective Patient-Physician Communication – A Concise Review
Aditya K Ghosh1, Shashank Joshi2, Amit Ghosh3
13rd year Medical Student, St George’s University School of Medicine, Grenada; 2Dean, Indian College of Physicians; Consultant
Endocrinologist, Lilawati Hospital, Bhatia Hospital, Apollo Sugar Clinic, Mumbai, Maharashtra; 3Professor of Medicine, Mayo Clinic
College of Medicine and Sciences, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
Received: 10.05.2020; Accepted: 18.05.2020
REVIEW ARTICLE
Introduction
Any approach on the topic on
patient physician communication
should start with understanding of the
definition of the complex environment
where the communications take place,
i, e., healthcare, the uniqueness of
medicine as a service industry and
the expectations of the patient of their
physicians. Healthcare is often defined
as comprised healthcare systems and
the various actions and policy within
the system which improve health or
well being.1 A system based approach
of assessing care includes looking at the
structure of healthcare, examining the
processes involved in giving actual care
and the outcomes which results from
the consequence of the interaction of
the patient with the healthcare system.
While excellent communication is
involved in every step, it is most vital
during the process of delivering care.
Medicine is a service industry
however medical services are different
from other services.2 Unlike the ‘want’
services like telecommunication and
entertainment industry, healthcare is a
“need,’ service. Patient’s (consumer of
medical service) are under considerable
stress. Medical services are highly
complex and technical and patients are
at a considerable disadvantage due to
the lack of knowledge on the disease.
Most patients thereby have to trust their
physician to be their care providers
unequivocally.
In the healthcare environment,
patients are challenged emotionally
and go through physically grueling
procedures and the stakes are usually
high for patients. Errors in diagnosis,
treatment plan or procedure can do
great harm to the patient and worsen
their quality of life. Hence most
patients have to place an implicit trust
on their physician. This makes patient
seek physicians who possess high
interpersonal qualities.
There has been considerable debate
over years as what constitutes an
ideal physician behavior? Based
on a qualitative study of telephone
interviews of 192 patients seen in
the different medical specialties in
Mayo Clinic Scottsdale, Arizona and
Mayo Clinic Rochester, Minnesota
between the years 2001 to 2002, the
ideal physician was felt to be confident,
empathetic, humane, personal,
respectful, forthright, and thorough.2
Physician behavior was felt to be as
important as their technical skills and
could reflect on patients first perception
of physician competence. Emanuel
and Dubler3 have suggested that the
ideal physician-patient relationship
includes 6 C’s- Choice, competence,
communication, compassion, continuity
and (no ) conflict of interest.
The processes of delivering care
include interactions that occur between
the patient and the healthcare system
and comprises of (i) clinical care
and (ii) interpersonal care1. While
clinical care involve the biomedical
aspect of medicine and requires the
physician to be skilled at diagnosing
and treating the illness, interpersonal
care require the interaction of the
patient with the physician or other
health care provider and require skills
like communication, building trustful
relationship, honesty, respect, integrity,
empathy, and compassion.
In the present review we will focus
on patient-physician communication
with its challenges in clinical medicine
especially in India and elsewhere.
We will review the standard tools
that can enhance patient physician
communication in clinical practice
and describe educational methods
used in training of medical students
and physicians in the area of patient
physician communication. We highlight
knowledge and skills required to
communicate with patients using
Abstract
Current medical care is heavily reliant on the use of evidence-based guidelines
dealing with diagnosis and therapy. The burgeoning medical literature, easy
availability of medical information in the social media and consumerism has
increased the additional number of issues discussed during a patient physician
meeting. Inability to satisfy the patient or their families due to poor communication
skills of physicians remains an universal challenge all over the world. Poor patient
physician communication decrease patient compliance to treatment strategies,
poor patient satisfaction scores and on the extreme lead to violence directed
to physicians. Most medical schools and residency programs have incorporated
patient-physician’s communication skills in their curriculum. Similar opportunities
to improve communication skills are available for practicing physicians. There
are numerous tools that can be readily incorporated to improve the quality of
patient physician communication. Communicating remotely with patients in the
new era of COVD-19 using telehealth technology needs development of new skills
that can be easily taught. Every physician need to periodically assess their own
communication skills, and seek out conferences and learning opportunities within
their hospitals, state, national or international medical community to continue
learning and practicing new communication skills.
Journal of The Association of Physicians of India Vol. 68 June 2020
54
telehealth. This is of great relevance as
we need to communicate and manage
patients with chronic medical disorders
during the COVID-19 crises.
Challenges of Patient Physician
Communication
Recent innovations in diagnostic
medicine and availability of newer
treatment options have increased the
scope and opportunities of patient
physician communications abound in
developed countries. However many
medical leaders have lamented over
the slow progress of communications
skills in physicians which seem to lag
behind the tremendous advances in
scientific knowledge. Levinson and
Pizzo4 reported that there may be
2 major factors affecting physician-
patient communication.
1. Effective communication needs
the physician to be an active listener and
spend time with patients. Physicians
need to listen to their patients stories
and how the illness affected their
patients life. Active listening takes time
but can yield essential clues about the
patient’s health. Doctors are under
tremendous pressure to be productive
as required by the practice. In the
hospital practices there are frequent
handoff in transition of care which
makes time for connection with patients
challenging.
2. Many medical school and
residency programs provide inadequate
education on effective communication
skills. Lot more time is devoted in
teaching courses on advances in science
and technology as well as learning
evidence-based guidelines. In pre-
clinical years students are able to spend
time learning the curriculum as well
as taking part in OSCE’s. However
when students enter their clinical years
communication skills are not addressed
real-time in the locations where they
see the patient. Observation of students
when they examine patient’s in the
clinics or hospital setting and providing
with timely and specific feedback on
the pattern of communication that they
had with their patient is lacking in most
medical schools skills
In a study of videotaped interactions
of patient physician communication,
Fossum and Arborelius5 identified
several components of a favorable
patient centered consultation.
These include for (i) the provider
to be flexible, and (ii) being able
to frequently move back and forth
between discussion and communication
with the patient’s problems keeping the
patient’s expectation and concern into
account. Consultations that included
a steady, slow, sequential movement
through the topics were associated with
poor patient satisfaction as these did
not involve patient’s input and there
was a perception halfhearted attempt
for a shared decision making
Patient centric interviews and patient
physician communication
One the most common mistaken
notion is that every physician is the
skilled communicator.6 Most patients
presume that a technical sound doctor
is also an expert communicator. They
are disappointed many times as a
result of this assumption. Like most
disciplines in medicine, excellent
communication is a learned skill
that is not intuitive though can be
mastered with practice. The skill to be
an effective communicator is a lifelong
learning experience which needs
continuous practice and improvement
throughout the physician’s career. For
most physicians good communication
is also a good business practice.6
From the patient’s perspective it is
widely believed that patient centric
communication is preferred over a
physician centric communication style
when it comes to history taking. Patient
centered communication has a positive
impact on several important outcomes
like patient satisfaction, their adherence
to treatment recommendations, and
self-management of chronic diseases7.
Patient centered communication
increases the health providers
understanding of patients individual
needs, their values and perspectives,
and allows them to give to the patient
the information that they need for
their own care, to build trust and
understanding between the patient
and the physician. This pattern of
communication involves both verbal
and nonverbal of physicians (e.g.,
posture, eye contact, vocal tone).
Clinical outcomes in the management
of diabetes, hypertension, and cancer
are improved in patients who have
had a chance to communicate the
problems clearly by the physician
using a patient centric communication
style. Breakdown in communication is
associated with increased likelihood
that patient will initiate malpractice
actions,
National Cancer Institute lists six
fundamental functions of physician
patient communication namely, (i)
foster healing relationship, (ii) asking
and exchanging information, (iii)
responding to patients emotions, (iv)
managing uncertainty,(v) making
informed decision, and (vi) enabling
patient self management.8
Tools to Improving medical
communication skills
The common myths about doctor
patient communication is that
these skills are intuitive, innate,
and automatically learned by more
experience.9 Communication skills can
be learnt and improved. Physicians need
to devote time throughout their career
as communication skill is a lifelong
learning endeavor. Communication
needs to be thoughtful and measured
as words uttered in haste cannot be
retracted and have an adverse effect
on patients. What we say and how
we communicate has a placebo effect
(reduce anxiety) or nocebo effect (that
is bad communication can increase
pain and anxiety)! Patient’s values their
physician’s communication skills and
consider them equal or greater than any
cool technical skills. These also affect
the patient’s ratings of the care they
have received in hospital.
Many tools have emerged to aid in
doctor patient communication.
A. The medical interview process
can be conducted using the pneumonic
GREAT, LAURS and VALUE technique.9
i. GREAT : Greeting and Goals/
Rapport/ Evaluations, Expectations,
Examination and Explanation/ Ask,
Answer, Acknowledge/ Tacit agreement
and Thanks.
ii. LAURS : Listening, Acceptance,
Utilization of appropriate word,
Reframing, and Suggestion.
iii. VALUE: Value family statements,
Acknowledge emotions, Listen,
Understand a patient as a person, Elicit
questions. VALUE technique can help
in shared decision-making.
B. Relationship building skills can
be enhanced using PEARLS technique.10
PEARLS include Partnership for
joint problem-solving, Empathetic
understanding, Apologies for barriers
to learners success, Respect for patients
values and choices, Legitimation of
feelings and intentions, and Support
Journal of The Association of Physicians of India Vol. 68 June 2020 55
for efforts at correction.
C. Patient centered interview could
include the sentence ‘what else’ which
would let the patient to express all
the concerns rather than interrupting
patients after the first statement11
D. Assessing patients understanding
of medical problem can be performed
using the Ask Tell Ask’ technique 12.
The ‘ask tell ask’ method includes the
following steps:
i. ASK the patient to describe the
current understanding of the issue this
will help the provider understand the
patient’s level of knowledge, emotional
status, and degree of education.
ii. TELL the patient in a simple
language what you need to communicate
regarding diagnosis, bad news, or
treatment options while avoiding
giving long lectures speak on easy
language languages
iii. ASK the patient if she/he
understood what you just said. This
will give you an opportunity to check
the patients understanding of her
problem
E. When things are not clear-
one effective technique that is used
commonly when things are not clear
or when you’re stuck is to ask for more
information using ‘Tell me more!”
F. Communication tools used while
responding to emotions - Use the
pneumonic NURSE13
i. N -Naming the emotion
ii. U -Understanding that the
patient’s feelings are problems. This
helps and building a relationship
iii. R -Respecting. Praise the
patient for strength. This this can be
a non-verbal response involving facial
expression, touch or change in posture
but could also be a verbal response
acknowledging and respecting the
patients emotions that shows empathy
iv. S- Supporting. Position can
express concern, willingness to help,
suggest statements about partnerships.
Acknowledge patients efforts to cope
v. E -Exploring and asking the
patient to elaborate on the emotion.
This puts the physician in the patient’s
position and to communicate that you
understand their situation.
Empathy is different from sympathy
which is a feeling of pity or concern
from outside the patient’s position
G. One strategy of breaking bad
news involves communication step
summarized by the six step pneumonic
SPIKES14
SPIKES stands for Setting,
Perception, Invitation, Knowledge,
Empathy, Strategize14. The six- step
protocol for delivering SPIKES include:
i. Setting: plan ahead and have
appropriate personal and family
members present. Anticipate for
possible patient reaction,
ii. Perceptions: as the patient what
he or she has been told about the
disease and audit the purpose of
meeting. Correct any misconception
iii. Invitation find out how much
the patient wants to know and how
was your she would prefer to hear
information
iv. Knowledge: gift patient the
news use small sentences without
medical jargon use pauses to address
any emotion.
v. Empathy use empathetic statement
to address emotions. Resist temptation
to fix the situation.
vi. Strategize emphasize what can
be done. Shift hope to achievable goals.
The key feature is maintaining hope
is to support the patient through the
grief and to re-orient them to what is
more achievable. Understanding what
is most important to the patient or what
the patient is most afraid of when they
are faced with the new medical reality
helps the patient grasp their situation.
An important aspect of communication
with patient is advanced care planning,
the process of finding out from the
patient the future goals of care as
disease worsens, and identifying a
surrogate decision maker.
What is the patients coping style?
Monitors versus Blunters
It is important to know your patient’s
coping style. Are they monitors or
blunters? Patients who have a problem
focused coping style are called monitors,
patient who use emotion focused
coping’s are called blunters.15
Monitors are more concerned and
distressed about the risk for disease
including cancer. They tend to scan
and amplify worrisome cues in their
health information and worry about
threats and risk for a long period of
time. They experience great anxiety
about health risk and keep worrying
about threatening information. While
dealing with patients who are monitors
it is important to provide them with
detailed information about the health
risk or this specific condition as well as
strategy of managing and reducing the
risk to decrease the anxiety.
On the other hand blunters do not
seek for detailed information about the
health risk of their medical condition.
They become overwhelmed with health
information. They find large quantity
of information to be stressful specially
if it includes statistics and risk factors
and therefore blunt or block it from
their conscious thought. Blunters may
avoid medical screening procedure
or choose not to engage in important
health behaviors depending on how
health information is presented and
interpreted by them. Effective health
messages presented to blunters should
be short and succinct. Physicians should
utilize non threatening language and
explained the course of action in simple
terms.
Can communication skills be taught?
1. Experiences with practicing
Physicians: Communication skills can
be taught to practicing physicians10. A
communications skill building course
for physician has been conducted
twice annually since 2004 in the
Mayo Clinic Arizona. These courses
where designed to increase physicians
personal awareness as well as allow
them to develop new communication
and interpersonal skills. Satisfaction
data from 3,561 patient surveys of 80
physicians who attended this course
were analyzed. Patients who were seen
by physicians who had completed the
course reported a higher satisfaction
rate as compared to the baseline scores
of these physicians. There was also a
18% decrease in patient complaints.15
The topics that were included in this
course where, (i) active listening and
reflection, (ii) eliciting and negotiating
an agenda and (iii) relationship
building. These topics were covered
with a combination didactics and
role-playing simulation. Participants
shared challenging experiences and
have opportunity to engage in role-play
simulation, followed by facilitator
guided debriefing. All participants
offered their perspectives and strategies
to each other when they encountered
similar situations. Facilitators noted
a increased spirit of continuous
learning and improvement. Physicians
where encouraged to incorporate the
appropriate skills and behaviors which
Journal of The Association of Physicians of India Vol. 68 June 2020
56
they found more useful for the practice.
2. Experience with medical students:
Medical students communication
skills at the Mayo Medical School is
assessed using a validated Interview
Rubric comprising of 13 items.16 Each
item under the category carry a score
of 1-4 assessing the thoroughness of
completion of each task under each
category. The Interview Rubric is used
to observe and provide feedback to
medical students during history taking
sessions of standardized patient’s..
The 13 categories of the Interview
Rubric are:
1. Introduction: An effective
introduction lessens the patient’s
anxiety. The initial first few minutes
of patient physician interaction is very
helpful informing a strong foundation,
2. Eye contact with the patient:
The provider’s eyes should be at the
same level with the patient’s eyes. A
consistent engagement on the part of
the provider is necessary as it shows
good listening capability.
3. Nonverbal communication :
Demonstration of emotions of physician
(student) through nodding off the head,
posture, body position, gives patient
an impression that the provider is
interested and empathetic
4. Listening. Not being listened is a
major source of patient to satisfaction.
Good listening skills and essential for
patient provider relationship.
5. Questions: Use simple language
in asking questions from the patient
instead of using complex medical
jargon. Clarify rather than simplify the
patient’s problems to help the student
come to a diagnosis.
6. Wait – time: Allow enough time
for the patient to answer one question
before going to the next question.
Giving inadequate time is disturbing
to patient.
7. Concern: Showing genuine
concern for patients problems and
interest in every patient
8. Organizations: Interview should
be conducted in an organized manner.
It doesn’t mean that it should be rigid
9. Information gathering: Establish
a list of the patient’s agenda for the
visit. Determine according to the
time available and the urgency of the
patient’s visit.
10. Focus: Interrupt the patient as
little as possible. However a subtle
control over the flow of the direction of
the interview is important to facilitate
the discussion.
11. Empathy: Ability to understand
the patient’s feelings and put his/
her feelings into words is essential
in Medicine. Demonstrating
empathy is essential part of effective
communication
12. Awareness of unspoken issues:
Gently probing and reading between
the lines when necessary can frequently
allow the physician gain significant
medical information hence watching
the patients emotions and concerns that
light below the surface of conversation
is important
13. Closure: An appropriate closure
to the interview is important. The
physician needs to summarize what
was discussed. It is necessary to ensure
to the patient that there are no pending
issues.
Communication in Telehealth era: The
COVID-19 experience
The nature of the Coronavirus
Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic
has forced the medical practice to
evolve rapidly in order to adapt to the
new requirements. One of the most
notable adaptations recently has been
the relationship between patient care
and telemedicine has been one that
has slowly evolved over the years.
While in recent years, the practice of
telehealth has been evolving slowly,
it was still not considered plausible
that telehealth could be practiced
effectively. However, COVID-19 has
forced that plausibility to quickly
become a reality in order to safely
practice social distancing and to deliver
effective clinical care while avoiding
unnecessary face to face exposures
between doctors and their patients.
Even whilst the kinks and drawbacks
of telehealth are being discovered and
worked through, the practice is being
put to use by medical practitioners
around the world.
Telehealth, also known as
telemedicine, is defined as the
dissemination of medical information
that is conveyed through the medium
of electronic communication. The
modalities of this electronic
communication comprise of a wide
variety of resources including e-mail,
video chat, phone calls, remote
wireless monitoring, and mobile apps.17
Tuckson, et. Al,17 in their seminal paper
mentioned that there are three core
levels at which telehealth is practiced:
1) Clinician to Clinician, 2) Clinician to
Patient, and 3) Patient to Mobile Health
Technology.
At each level, the tools that are
utilized to practice telehealth and
the services that most often utilize
these tools are unique. For example,
clinicians will communicate to each
other via the use of e-mails and videos,
especially in settings of Emergency
trauma, ICU care, and surgical peer
mentoring.17 In these settings, it is
important for clinicians to be able
to communicate via video in order
to see examples and establish visual
connection regarding the care that
needs to be provided. Clinician to
patient telehealth is practiced in the
setting of care for chronic conditions,
medication management, mental health,
and counseling. In this setting, many
modalities of telehealth utilized include
remote wireless monitoring, as well as
video chat and phone calls.17 In these
settings, the connection outside of the
clinic or hospital setting is important to
cultivate via telehealth modalities, as it
allows for patients to routinely follow
up with their doctors without having to
schedule multiple visits, which could
discourage effective patient follow-up.
It also allows physicians to monitor
how their patients are improving over
time, or if there are changes that need
to be made to the management plan
in order to more effectively treat their
conditions (1). The last core setting
for telehealth involves the patient’s
connection to mobile health technology.
This is a very unique and growing
field, as it is a way of empowering
patient’s to become knowledgeable
of their own well-being in real-time
and to be a part of the process of self-
monitoring for signs of improvement.
The services that utilize this type of
telehealth include diet monitoring,
real-time fitness monitoring, and
overall health education. These mobile
health technologies are expanding
in number and method by the day
and include such devices as wearable
monitors, smartphones, and mobile
apps on the phone and tablet that can
provide evidence-based advice on
what areas of health the patient needs
to improve.17
All three of this core telehealth
settings (clinician-clinician, clinician-
patient, and patient-mobile health
technology) work together to guide
patient care and management.
Understanding the multiple avenues
and opportunities to incorporate
telehealth into medical care will help
in developing systems that can serve
as a powerful force in preventative
medicine, improve patient care, and
promote overall patient well-being.
As important as these benefits
Journal of The Association of Physicians of India Vol. 68 June 2020 57
are, it is important to explore the
drawbacks of telehealth practice as
well. A thorough understanding of
where telehealth can be seen as inferior
to a proper visit to the clinic can help
improve the overall experience of
the Doctor-Patient relationship while
conducting a Telehealth visit. Details
of the critical components of effective
telehealth visit are included in Table 1.
Effective communication with the
patient can drastically improve the
overall experience of telehealth practice
by using the techniques GREAT9 and
NURSE 13 discussed before.
These drawbacks include: 1) set up,
2) skill set is foreign to many healthcare
workers, not a developed skill set,
3) lack of management of the whole
environment, 4) anxiety management
(importance of building connection
with patient, knowing how to position
oneself in camera to not look down at
patient)
In conclusion patient physician
communication is among the most
essential lifelong skills for every
physician. Every physician need
to periodically assess their own
communication skills, and seek out
conferences and learning opportunities
within their hospitals, state, national
or international medical community
to continue learning and practicing
new communication skills. Every
physician needs to be aware of
their own communication styles
and the prevalent culture within
the community where they see their
patients. Communication skills needs
to be modified based on the subtle
cultural variation that exists between
different communities. Communicating
remotely with patients in the new era of
COVD-19 using telehealth technology
needs development of new skills
that can be easily taught. Mastering
good communication skills could be
one of the most satisfying personal
achievements for every physician.
References
1. Campbell SM, Roland MO, Buetow SA. Dening quality of
care. Soc Sci Med 2000; 51:1611-25.
2. Bendapudi NM,Berry LL, Frey KA, Parish JT,Rayburn WL.
Patients’ perspectives on ideal physician behaviors.Mayo
Clinic Proceedings2006; 81:338-344.
3. Emanuel EJ, Dubler NN. Preserving the physician-patient
relationship in the era of managed care. JAMA 1995; 273:323-
9.
4. Levinson W, Pizzo PA. Patient-physician communication: It’s
about time. JAMA 2011; 305:1802-1803.
5. Fossum B, Arborelius E. Patient-centred communication:
videotaped consultations. Patient Educ Couns 2004; 54:163-
169.
6. Neuwirth ZE. An essential understanding of physician-
patient communication. Part II. J Med Pract Manage 1999;
15:68-72.
7. Levinson W, Lesser CS, Epstein RM. Developing physician
communication skills for patient-centered care. Health A
(Millwood) 2010; 29:1310-8.
8. Epstein R, Street R, Jr. Patient-Centered Communication in
Cancer Care: Promoting Healing and Reducing Suering.
Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute; 2007.
9. Brindley PG, Smith KE, Cardinal P, LeBlanc F. Improving
Medical Communication: Skills for a Complex (And
Multilingual) Clinical World. Canadian Respiratory Journal
2014; 21:89-91.
10. Kennedy M, Denise M, Fasolino M, John P, Gullen M, David
J. Improving the patient experience through provider
communication skills building. Patient Exper J 2014; 1:56–60.
11. Barrier PA, Li JT, Jensen NM. Two words to improve physician-
patient communication: what else? Mayo Clin Proc 2003;
78:211-214.
12. French JC, Colbert CY, Pien LC, et al. Targeted feedback in
the milestones era: utilization of the ask-tell-ask feedback
model to promote reection and self-assessment. J Surg
Educ 2015; 72:e274-e279.
13. Communication: What Do Patients Want and Need? Journal
of Oncology Practice 2008; 4:249-253 - https://www.ncbi.
nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2794010/ Accessed on
September 30, 2017
14. Baile WF, BuckmanR, Lenzi R, Glober G, Beale EA,
KundelkaAP.SPIKES-a six-step protocol for delivering bad
news: application to the patient with cancer. Oncologist
2000; 5:302-311.
15. Miller SM. Monitoring versus blunting styles of coping with
cancer inuence the information patients want and need
about their disease. Implications for cancer screening and
management. Cancer 1995; 76:167-77.
16. Ber man AC, Chutka DS. Assessing eective physician-patient
communication skills: “Are you listening to me, doc?” Korean
Journal of Medical Education 2016; 28:243-249.
17. Tuckson RV, Edmunds M, Hodgkins ML. Telehealth: NEJM
2017; 377:1585-1592.
Table 1: Critical components of an Eective Telehealth Visit
What is it How is it conducted eectively
Environment I. Lighting
II. Background noise (either patient
or doctor)
III. What is behind the physician in
the background
Ensure that light is in front of face not
being the head, if windows in room,
ensure that light is on face or close the
windows.
Physician should also be aware of the
room that they conduct the telehealth
interview, and that it is appropriate
for the nature of the visit.
Vocal variety I. Tone while speaking
II. Clarity of voice
Physician should make sure to speak
with the patient in an engaged fashion
in order to foster the connection
with the patient. Also important to
ensure that the computer microphone
is appropriately capturing the
conversation, as technology should
not lead to miscommunication.
Condentiality Assurance that communication is
done over a secure line that will not
leave patient vulnerable to violation of
their privacy.
Working with hospital administration
to ensure that the service that the
telehealth is performed with will
maintain patient condentiality.
The physician’s use of headphones
will also ensure that the patient’s
discussions are not heard by anyone
else other than the physician.
Lag in response Faulty internet connection can lead to
a delay in response to answers.
Importance of patience during
technical diculties.
Lack of immediacy moving
from interview to executing
management
Upon conclusion of the Telehealth
interview, patient’s can feel like the
ball does not get rolling as quickly
as it does if they had just gone to an
in-clinic visit instead
Acknowledging patient concerns
while also eectively ensuring that the
patient’s management is not delayed
as much as possible. Explaining to
patient when it is not possible.
Aitude to unfamiliarity Easy for both physician and patient to
become frustrated with the unfamiliar
interaction, making it all the more
important that the appropriate
aitude is utilized during telehealth
communications.
Eective communication partnered
with a positive aitude towards the
dynamic situation can help improve
the overall experience that comes
when conducting a a telehealth visit.
Ensure that both sides are aware of
the unfamiliar, and mutually agree to
work together to cross those hurdles.
Equipment I. Web Camera
II. Microphone
III. Internet connection
IV. Adjustable height to make sure
webcam is at eye level
V. External lighting (optional)
Test out the webcam and observe how
the image appears, ensure that the
camera is at eye level by propping
the computer up with books or using
an adjustable chair. Important to not
appear to be looking down at the
patient when possible, as having the
camera at eye level best simulates the
regular in-clinic visit
Appropriate assignment of
purpose of telehealth visit
When entering into a telehealth visit,
similar to a regular in-clinic visit,
both doctor and patient should have a
shared understanding of the purpose
of that specic visit.
Before the telehealth meeting is
started, it is important that the
physician communicates with
the patient at least one day prior,
explaining the purpose of the
telehealth visit, in order to optimize
the discussion and keep it focused.
It is also important so that there is
not miscommunication regarding the
content and context of the discussion
that will be conducted during the
Telehealth visit.
... Notably, strong endorsement of positive communication with doctors and nurses emerged as the most consistent and impactful factors, suggesting that patient-centered communication strategies may be targeted to enhance the overall inpatient experience. Previous studies illustrate that good physician-patient communication plays a key role in increasing patient compliance with treatment strategies and patient satisfaction scores [20,21]. While the magnitude of association between the nurse-patient relationship and overall satisfaction may not significantly differ from the doctor-patient relationship (β = 0.33 and 0.40, respectively), it is still crucial to examine any potential barriers or challenges specific to nursing practice. ...
Article
Full-text available
Study objective This study assessed the overall satisfaction with oncological care, including barriers to care, and identified its associated predictors among adult cancer patients in Vietnam. Methods In this cross-sectional study, we enrolled 300 adult cancer patients receiving inpatient care at a large urban oncological hospital between June and July 2022. Multivariable linear regression analyses examined associations between patient experiences and overall satisfaction ratings with cancer care. Results The mean overall satisfaction with oncological care was 8.82 out of 10, with 98.0% recommending this facility to their friends and family. In an adjusted model, being female (β = 0.29, 95%CI: 0.04, 0.53), endorsing satisfaction with patient-nurse communication (β = 0.33, 95%CI: 0.13, 0.53), patient-doctor communication (β = 0.40, 95%CI: 0.11, 0.70), and psychoeducation about oncological medication management (β = 0.30, 95%CI: 0.14, 0.45) were positively associated with overall ratings. In contrast, individuals with delays in treatment scheduling reported lower overall satisfaction with oncological care (β = -0.38, 95%CI: -0.64, -0.13). Patients perceived health system, social/environmental, and individual barriers to care: worries about income loss due to attending treatment (43.3%); fear, depression, anxiety, and distress (36.8%); concerns about affordability of treatment (36.7%) and transportation problems (36.7%); and excessive waiting times for appointments (28.8%). Conclusion This study showed high overall patient satisfaction with cancer care quality. Patient-centered communication strategies and psychoeducation about oncological medication management may be targeted to further enhance the cancer inpatient experience. Raising awareness about treatment options and services, and integrating mental health awareness into oncological care may ameliorate patient distress and facilitate greater satisfaction with oncological treatment processes.
... 50 Effectively addressing this issue requires an improvement in the communication skills of physicians. 51 To achieve this, it is essential to integrate more communication-related topics into the curricula of medical faculties. However, this alone may not suffice: a systematic review found that in the short and medium term, training given to healthcare professionals to prevent and minimise violence by patients was not effective in preventing violence compared to no training. ...
Article
Full-text available
Violence against physicians is not a newly emerged but an increasingly serious problem. Various studies have reported a prevalence of up to 90%. If not prevented, it not only causes physical and mental harm to physicians who are dedicated to serving humanity but also affects the entire healthcare system and, consequently, the whole community with its direct and indirect effects. Some interventions have a positive outcome when effectively managed. However, for these interventions to be permanent and effective, they need to be multidisciplinary, legally backed and adopted as public policy. In this article, the prevalence of violence against physicians in the literature, its causes, practices worldwide, and suggestions for solving this problem are compiled.
... Effective communication can improve patient engagement and satisfaction [1,2]. The doctors' communication skills and empathy are among the most critical factors for a satisfying patientphysician relationship [3]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background Effective communication is the key to a successful relationship between doctors and their patients. Empathy facilitates effective communication, but physicians vary in their ability to empathize with patients. Listening styles are a potential source of this difference. We aimed to assess empathy and listening styles among medical students and whether students with certain listening styles are more empathetic. Methods In this cross-sectional study, 97 medical students completed the Jefferson scale of Empathy (JSE) and the revised version of the Listening Styles Profile (LSP-R). The relationship between empathy and listening styles was assessed by comparing JSE scores across different listening styles using ANOVA in SPSS software. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered significant. Results Overall, the students showed a mean empathy score of 103 ± 14 on JSE. Empathy scores were lower among clinical students compared to preclinical students. Most of the medical students preferred the analytical listening style. The proportion of students who preferred the relational listening style was lower among clinical students compared to preclinical students. There was no significant relationship between any of the listening styles with empathy. Conclusion Our results do not support an association between any particular listening style with medical students’ empathic ability. We propose that students who have better empathetic skills might shift between listening styles flexibly rather than sticking to a specific listening style.
... Fontesse et al. (34) further put forward that dehumanization's experience is anchored in negative social interactions. Poor patient physician communication decreases patient compliance to treatment strategies, patient satisfaction scores and on the extreme leads to violence directed to physicians (66). In humanized care, communication is an effective tool for establishing a good relationship between medical professionals and patients (46). ...
Article
Full-text available
Background Patients’ attribution in negative medical situations plays a vital role in reducing medical conflicts and developing high-quality healthcare. The purpose of this study was to investigate the triadic relations among patients’ attribution, medical humanization and communication. Furthermore, the mediating effect of communication was tested. Methods A cross-sectional study on the relationship between patients’ attribution in negative medical situations and medical staff’s humanization and communication was conducted, with 3,000 participants totally from 103 hospitals of three different levels in different regions. Results There were significant positive correlations among medical staff’s humanization, communication and patients’ attributional styles (r = 0.112–0.236, p < 0.001 for all). Medical humanization had direct predictive effects on patients’ attributional style in negative medical situations (β = 0.14, p < 0.01). Mediation analysis also indicated the indirect predictive effect of medical humanization on patients’ attributions through communication (β = 0.02, p < 0.01). Conclusion Patients’ attribution in negative medical situations is predicted by patients’ perception of medical staff’s humanization in healthcare and physicians’ communication skills. Medical humanization not only affects patients’ attributions in negative situations directly, but also influences patients’ attributions via communication indirectly. The humanistic care should be included in medical education for healthcare professionals, and professional training on medical staff’s humanization and communication skills is strongly needed to establish healthy and harmonious doctor–patient relationship.
... In this review, patient-centred outcomes refer to all the outcomes that contribute to the recovery or indicate the recovery of patients, as well as suggest positive experiences with the care process. For instance, effective communication is associated with enhanced patient satisfaction, regulating emotions, and increasing compliance, leading to improved health and better outcomes [7,8]. According to [9], quality communication enhances patients' trust in their providers, making patients more satisfied with the treatment. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background Effective communication is a cornerstone of quality healthcare. Communication helps providers bond with patients, forming therapeutic relationships that benefit patient-centred outcomes. The information exchanged between the provider and patient can help in medical decision-making, such as better self-management. This rapid review investigated the effects of quality and effective communication on patient-centred outcomes among older patients. Methods Google Scholar, PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, and PsycINFO were searched using keywords like “effective communication,“ “elderly,“ and “well-being.“ Studies published between 2000 and 2023 describing or investigating communication strategies between older patients (65 years and above) and providers in various healthcare settings were considered for selection. The quality of selected studies was assessed using the GRADE Tool. Results The search strategy yielded seven studies. Five studies were qualitative (two phenomenological study, one ethnography, and two grounded theory studies), one was a cross-sectional observational study, and one was an experimental study. The studies investigated the effects of verbal and nonverbal communication strategies between patients and providers on various patient-centred outcomes, such as patient satisfaction, quality of care, quality of life, and physical and mental health. All the studies reported that various verbal and non-verbal communication strategies positively impacted all patient-centred outcomes. Conclusion Although the selected studies supported the positive impact of effective communication with older adults on patient-centred outcomes, they had various methodological setbacks that need to be bridged in the future. Future studies should utilize experimental approaches, generalizable samples, and specific effect size estimates.
Article
Full-text available
Background. Today, the public does not want to be just a passive consumer of health services. Patients often expect to be informed and involved in decisions about their health. Objective. With better doctor–patient communication, patients are more likely to follow treatment recommendations. Material and methods. The study was conducted using a face-to-face survey method on a group of 203 adult, independent patients from 2021 to 2022 at a medical facility, i.e., a rehabilitation clinic. The purpose of this study was to assess the determinants of doctor–patient communication in terms of patient rights. One of patients’ rights is the right to information about their health condition and treatment methods and the right to ask questions when the doctor does not provide details about the treatment or diagnosis or when it is not understandable. Doctors providing information to the patient and the opportunity for the patient to ask questions are key elements in the process of making informed decisions regarding further medical treatment. Therefore, patients were divided into two groups: active (+) and passive in communication (−) with doctors. Results. Patients who were active in communication (33%) wanted to ask questions or had the opportunity to ask the doctor questions, and thus, they were able to take an active part in the discussion with the doctor. In contrast, patients who were passive in communication (67%) did not want to ask questions or did not have the opportunity to ask the doctor questions, and therefore, their active participation in the discussion and thus their right to ask questions may have been limited. The authors’ survey shows that respondents with active communication were significantly more likely than patients with passive communication (almost 100% vs. 86%) to obtain information about their condition (p = 0.002), diagnostic methods (p = 0.003), therapeutic methods (p = 0.00007), treatment results, and prognosis (p = 0.0008). Moreover, almost all respondents with active communication as opposed to respondents with passive communication (95% vs. 52%) rated communication with doctors highest (on a scale from 0 to 5), including credible and professional approach to patients (p < 0.0001), providing information in clear and simple language (p < 0.0001), answering questions asked by patients (p < 0.0001), openness and kindness (p < 0.0001), maintaining professional confidentiality (p < 0.0001), or emotional support (p < 0.0001). Conclusions. Hence, the primary key element of the medical consultation is appropriate amount and content of information given to the patient, providing explanations and answering questions. Also importantly, according to the results, active communication between patients and doctors was significantly influenced by female gender, higher education, and a positive evaluation of communication with doctors.
Article
Full-text available
Amaç: Bu çalışma hasta bakış açısından acil serviste çalışan sağlık profesyonellerinin iletişim becerilerinin hastaların kaygı düzeylerine etkisini değerlendirmek amacıyla yapıldı. Yöntem: Çalışma tanımlayıcı ve ilişki arayıcı olarak Haziran-Ağustos 2022 tarihleri arasında, bir devlet hastanesinin acil servisine başvuran 740 hasta ile yapıldı. Veriler Bilgi Formu, Sağlık Bakımı İletişim Anketi (SBİA) ve Durumluluk Kaygı Envarteri (DKE) ile toplandı. Bulgular: Katılımcıların SBİA sözsüz yakınlık alt boyutu puan ortalamalarının 7.87±1.90, problem çözme alt boyutu puan ortalamalarının 15.53±3.67, saygı alt boyutu puan ortalamalarının 14.92±4.16, düşmanlığın olmaması alt boyutu puan ortalamalarının 9.70±2.48; DKE toplam puan ortalamalarının 48.51±4.47 olduğu saptandı. SBİA sözsüz yakınlık, problem çözme, saygı alt boyutları ile DKE toplam puan ortalaması arasında negatif yönde zayıf düzeyde anlamlı bir ilişki bulundu (p<0.001). Sağlık profesyonellerinin iletişim becerilerinin hastaların kaygı düzeyleri üzerine etkisinin %18.2 oranında olduğu ve kaygı düzeyleri üzerine en fazla etkinin negatif yönde sözsüz yakınlık alt boyutu olduğu saptandı (R 2 =0.182; B=-1.061; p<0.001). Sonuç: Hasta bakış açısından sağlık profesyonellerinin iletişim becerilerinin iyi düzeyde algılandığı ve hastaların orta düzeyde kaygı yaşadığı belirlendi. Acil servis sağlık profesyonellerinin iletişim becerilerinin iyi olarak algılanması, hastaların kaygı düzeylerini azalttığı bulundu. Sağlık profesyonellerinin iletişim becerilerini geliştirecek hizmet içi eğitimlerin yoğunlaştırılması önerilebilir. Abstract Aim: This study was conducted to evaluate the effect of communication skills of healthcare professionals working in the emergency department on patients' anxiety levels from the patient's perspective. Methods: This descriptive and correlational study was conducted with 740 patients who applied to the emergency department of a state hospital between June and August 2022. Data were collected using the Information Form, Health Care Communication Questionnaire (HCCQ) and State Anxiety Scale (SAS). Results: HCCQ nonverbal intimacy sub-dimension mean score of the participants was 7.87±1.90, problem solving sub-dimension mean score was 15.53±3.67, respect sub-dimension mean score was 14.92±4.16, absence of hostility sub-dimension score mean of 9.70±2.48; the mean total score of SAS was found to be 48.51±4.47. A weakly significant negative correlation was found between the nonverbal intimacy, problem solving and respect sub-dimensions of HCCQ and, the mean total score of SAS (p<0.001). It was found that the effect of communication skills of health professionals on anxiety levels of patients was 18.2% and the highest effect on anxiety levels was found to be the nonverbal closeness sub-dimension in a negative direction (R2=0.182; B=-1.061; p<0.001). Conclusion: From the patient perspective, it was determined that the communication skills of healthcare professionals were perceived as good and patients experienced moderate anxiety. It was found that the perception of good communication skills of emergency department healthcare professionals decreased the anxiety levels of patients. It may be recommended to intensify in-service trainings to improve the communication skills of healthcare professionals.
Preprint
Full-text available
Background: Effective communication is the key to a successful relationship between doctors and their patients. Empathy facilitates effective communication, but physicians vary in their ability to empathize with patients. Listening styles are a potential source of this difference. We aimed to assess empathy and listening styles among medical students and whether students with certain listening styles are more empathetic. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 97 medical students completed the Jefferson scale of Empathy (JSE) and the revised version of the Listening Styles Profile (LSP-R). The relationship between empathy and listening styles was assessed by comparing JSE scores across different listening styles using ANOVA in SPSS software. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered significant. Results: Overall, the students showed a mean empathy score of 103±14 on JSE. Empathy scores were lower among clinical students compared to preclinical students. Most of the medical students preferred the analytical listening style. The proportion of students who preferred the relational listening style was lower among clinical students compared to preclinical students. There was no significant relationship between any of the listening styles with empathy. Conclusion: Our results do not support an association between any particular listening style with medical students' empathic ability. We propose that students who have better empathetic skills flexibly shift between listening styles rather than sticking to a specific listening style.
Preprint
Full-text available
Background: Effective communication is a cornerstone of quality healthcare. Communication helps providers bond with patients, forming therapeutic relationships that benefit patient-centred outcomes. The information exchanged between the provider and patient can help in medical decision-making, such as better self-management. This systematic review investigated the effects of quality and effective communication on patient-centred outcomes among older patients. Methods: Google Scholar, PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, and PsycINFO were searched using keywords like "effective communication," "elderly," and "well-being." Studies published between 2000 and 2023 describing or investigating communication strategies between older patients (65 years and above) and providers in various healthcare settings were considered for selection. The quality of selected studies was assessed using the GRADE Tool. Results: The search strategy yielded seven studies. Four studies were qualitative (one phenomenological study, one ethnography, and two grounded theory studies), one was a cross-sectional observational study, one was an experimental study, and the final was a quantitative study (unclear design). The studies investigated the effects of verbal and nonverbal communication strategies between patients and providers on various patient-centred outcomes, such as patient satisfaction, quality of care, quality of life, and physical and mental health. All the studies reported that various verbal and non-verbal communication strategies positively impacted all patient-centred outcomes. Conclusion: Although the selected studies supported the positive impact of effective communication with older adults on patient-centred outcomes, they had various methodological setbacks that need to be bridged in the future. Future studies should utilize experimental approaches, generalizable samples, and specific effect size estimates.
Article
Full-text available
The education of a physician includes much more than acquiring competence in medical knowledge and technical expertise. Physicians also need to have excellent communication skills in order to communicate with patients. Communication skills form the foundation for a more positive patient-provider relationship, leading to greater patient satisfaction and better patient compliance. In the patient's eyes, the ability to communicate well forms a major component of a provider's clinical competence. The ability to communicate effectively with patients can contribute significantly to improved patient outcomes. Because of their importance in the practice of medicine, teaching interviewing and communication skills are a part of the curriculum for medical schools. At the Mayo Medical School, a tool was developed to assist in the assessment of medical students when communicating with patients as they elicit a medical history. This rubric has been very useful for both teaching and assessment, and it may be applicable to other healthcare settings as well.
Article
Full-text available
It has been reported that suboptimal communication represents the largest source of preventable error during acute medical care. Because a significant proportion of ongoing care relies heavily on verbal communication, it is incumbent on clinicians to develop, hone and maintain these skills in the interests of their patients and, at the same time, contribute to a more reliable and patient-focused health care system. This review briefly discusses why communication matters, practical strategies from both inside and outside clinical medicine, the implications of poor translation and the state of medical communication in Canada.
Article
Full-text available
Growing enthusiasm about patient-centered medical homes, fueled by the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act's emphasis on improved primary care, has intensified interest in how to deliver patient-centered care. Essential to the delivery of such care are patient-centered communication skills. These skills have a positive impact on patient satisfaction, treatment adherence, and self-management. They can be effectively taught at all levels of medical education and to practicing physicians. Yet most physicians receive limited training in communication skills. Policy makers and stakeholders can leverage training grants, payment incentives, certification requirements, and other mechanisms to develop and reward effective patient-centered communication.
Article
Full-text available
We describe a protocol for disclosing unfavorable information-"breaking bad news"-to cancer patients about their illness. Straightforward and practical, the protocol meets the requirements defined by published research on this topic. The protocol (SPIKES) consists of six steps. The goal is to enable the clinician to fulfill the four most important objectives of the interview disclosing bad news: gathering information from the patient, transmitting the medical information, providing support to the patient, and eliciting the patient's collaboration in developing a strategy or treatment plan for the future. Oncologists, oncology trainees, and medical students who have been taught the protocol have reported increased confidence in their ability to disclose unfavorable medical information to patients. Directions for continuing assessment of the protocol are suggested.
Article
Full-text available
This paper defines quality of health care. We suggest that there are two principal dimensions of quality of care for individual patients; access and effectiveness. In essence, do users get the care they need, and is the care effective when they get it? Within effectiveness, we define two key components--effectiveness of clinical care and effectiveness of inter-personal care. These elements are discussed in terms of the structure of the health care system, processes of care, and outcomes resulting from care. The framework relates quality of care to individual patients and we suggest that quality of care is a concept that is at its most meaningful when applied to the individual user of health care. However, care for individuals must placed in the context of providing health care for populations which introduces additional notions of equity and efficiency. We show how this framework can be of practical value by applying the concepts to a set of quality indicators contained within the UK National Performance Assessment Framework and to a set of widely used indicators in the US (HEDIS). In so doing we emphasise the differences between US and UK measures of quality. Using a conceptual framework to describe the totality of quality of care shows which aspects of care any set of quality indicators actually includes and measures and, and which are not included.
Article
The doctor’s interpersonal skills are arguably the most important to clinical outcome and patient experience. A peer-facilitated, communication skills-building course for physicians has been provided twice annually since its inception in 2004. The course was designed to increase personal awareness, as well as to help physicians develop new communication and interpersonal skills. Satisfaction data from 3,561 patient surveys on 80 providers who attended the course between 2006 and 2010 were analyzed one year before and one year after course participation. After completing the course, the proportion of “excellent” ratings of provider service (the highest rating on a 5-point scale) increased by 2% to 5.6%. The most notable improvements in service attributes under the provider’s control and covered in the course content were: involving the patient in care decisions (P < .001), explaining medical condition (P=.002), and the provider’s knowing the patient as a person (P = .004). Other improvements were noted in courtesy (by 3.4%, P=.027), listening (by 3.5%, P=.036), and overall quality of care from the provider (by 3.5%, P=.027). Attributes not directly under the provider’s control – nursing quality, teamwork, spending enough time, and likelihood to recommend – were included in the analysis; year-over-year changes in these were not significant. Further, providers who participated in the course, when compared to those who did not, experienced an 18-percent decrease in patient complaints. Improvements in perception of excellent provider communication and other service-related behaviors suggest this training approach may be useful in improving patient satisfaction, patient experience, and payment in value-based models.
Article
Background: The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education's Milestones Project focuses trainee education on the formation of valued behaviors and skills believed to be necessary for trainees to become independent practitioners. The development and refinement of behaviors and skills outlined within the milestones will require learners to monitor, reflect, and assess their own performance over time. External feedback provides an opportunity for learners to recalibrate their self-assessments, thereby enabling them to develop better self-monitoring and self-assessment skills. Yet, feedback to trainees is frequently generic, such as "great job," "nice work," or "you need to read more." Purpose: In this article, we describe a feedback model that faculty can use to provide specific feedback, while increasing accountability for learners. We offer practical examples of its use in a variety of settings in the milestone era. Innovation: The Ask-Tell-Ask (ATA) patient communication skills strategy, which was adapted for use as a trainee feedback model 10 years ago at our institution, is a learner-centered approach for reinforcing and modifying behaviors. The model is efficient, promotes learner accountability, and helps trainees develop reflection and self-assessment skills. A feedback agreement further enhances ATA by establishing a shared understanding of goals for the educational encounter. Conclusion: The ATA feedback model, combined with a feedback agreement, encourages learners to self-identify strengths and areas for improvement, before receiving feedback. Personal monitoring, reflection, self-assessment, and increased accountability make ATA an ideal learner-centered feedback model for the milestones era, which focuses on performance improvement over time. We believe the introduction of the ATA feedback model in surgical training programs is a step in the right direction towards meaningful programmatic culture change.
Article
The last few decades have witnessed incredible progress in the scientific underpinnings of medicine. New discoveries and innovations have created sophisticated tools and technologies that have changed the way diseases are diagnosed and managed. Ironically, some of these technologies have taken precedence over one of the most important skills of the compassionate physician—the art of listening to the patient. Patients often experience physicians as being too busy to listen and too distant to care. Consumer Web sites abound with criticisms about physicians' deficiencies in communication skills. This appears equally true in Canada and in the United States, despite the major differences in their health care systems.
Article
Even without comprehensive health care reform legislation, the US health care system is undergoing significant changes. Probably the most important change is the expansion of managed care with significant price competition. One of the major concerns about this change is the effect of managed care on the physician-patient relationship. To provide a normative standard for evaluating the effect of changes, we need an ideal conception of the physician-patient relationship. This ideal can be summarized by six C's: choice, competence, communication, compassion, continuity, and (no) conflict of interest. For the 37 million uninsured Americans there is little chance of realizing the ideal physician-patient relationship, since they lack the choice of practice setting and physician, receive care in a rushed atmosphere that undermines communication and compassion, and have no continuity of care. While many insured Americans may believe they have an ideal physician-patient relationship, the relationship is threatened by lack of a regular assessment of competence, by financial incentives that undermine good communication, and by the persistence of conflict of interest. The shift to managed care may improve the choice of practice settings, especially in sections of the country that currently lack managed care; increase choice of preventive services; make quality assessments more routine; and improve communication by making greater use of primary care physicians and nonphysician providers. However, the expansion of managed care and the imposition of significant cost control have the potential to undermine all aspects of the ideal physician-patient relationship. Choice could be restricted by employers and by managed care selection of physicians; poor quality indicators could undermine assessments of competence; conductivity requirements could eliminate time necessary for communication; changing from one to another managed care plan to secure the lowest costs could produce significant disruption in continuity of care; and use of salary schemes that reward physicians for not using medical services could increase conflict of interest.
Article
Two main psychologic coping styles for dealing with cancer and other health threats have been identified: monitoring (attending to) or blunting (avoiding) potentially threatening information. This article reviews results and implications from this research relevant to cancer screening and management. The Monitor-Blunter Style Scale has been used extensively to assess and categorize patients with regard to these coping styles to predict their differential responses to various cancer-related screening and management regimens. Patients characterized by a monitoring coping style generally are more concerned and distressed about their cancer risk, experience greater treatment side effects, are more knowledgeable about their medical situation, and are less satisfied with and more demanding about the psychosocial aspects of their care. They also prefer a more passive role in clinical decision making, are more adherent to medical recommendations, and manifest greater psychologic morbidity in response to cancer-related threats. Patients fare better (psychologically, behaviorally, and physiologically) when the information they receive about their medical condition is tailored to their own coping styles: generally those with a monitoring style tend to do better when given more information, and those with a blunting style do better with less information. However, patients with a monitoring style who are pessimistic about their future or who face long term, intensely threatening, and uncontrollable medical situations may require not just more information, but also, more emotional support to help them deal with their disease.