Technical ReportPDF Available

Photo-identification Catalogue and Status of the Northern Resident Killer Whale Population in 2019

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

Censuses of the northern resident killer whale population using photo-identification have been conducted annually since 1973. These studies are based on photographic recapture of permanent natural markings on every individual within the population. In this report, we summarize northern resident killer whale population trends over the time series of this study and provide a photo-identification catalogue of all individuals considered to be alive in 2019. This population has grown at a mean annual rate of 2.2% since 1973 and in 2019 contained a minimum of 310 individuals. Continued annual photo-identification censusing is a key strategy to accurately document the abundance, genealogy, sociality, demographics, and health of this threatened population.
Content may be subject to copyright.
1
Photo-identification Catalogue and Status of the
Northern Resident Killer Whale Population in 2019
Jared R. Towers, James F. Pilkington, Brian Gisborne, Brianna M. Wright,
Graeme M. Ellis, John K. B. Ford, and Thomas Doniol-Valcroze
Fisheries and Oceans Canada
Science Branch, Pacific Region
Pacific Biological Station
3190 Hammond Bay Road
Nanaimo, BC
V9T 6N7
2020
Canadian Technical Report of
Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 3371
Canadian Technical Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
Technical reports contain scientific and technical information that contributes to existing knowledge
but which is not normally appropriate for primary literature. Technical reports are directed primarily
toward a worldwide audience and have an international distribution. No restriction is placed on subject
matter and the series reflects the broad interests and policies of Fisheries and Oceans Canada, namely,
fisheries and aquatic sciences.
Technical reports may be cited as full publications. The correct citation appears above the abstract
of each report. Each report is abstracted in the data base Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts.
Technical reports are produced regionally but are numbered nationally. Requests for individual
reports will be filled by the issuing establishment listed on the front cover and title page.
Numbers 1-456 in this series were issued as Technical Reports of the Fisheries Research Board of
Canada. Numbers 457-714 were issued as Department of the Environment, Fisheries and Marine Service,
Research and Development Directorate Technical Reports. Numbers 715-924 were issued as Department
of Fisheries and Environment, Fisheries and Marine Service Technical Reports. The current series name
was changed with report number 925.
Rapport technique canadien des sciences halieutiques et aquatiques
Les rapports techniques contiennent des renseignements scientifiques et techniques qui constituent
une contribution aux connaissances actuelles, mais qui ne sont pas normalement appropriés pour la
publication dans un journal scientifique. Les rapports techniques sont destinés essentiellement à un
public international et ils sont distribués à cet échelon. II n'y a aucune restriction quant au sujet; de fait,
la série reflète la vaste gamme des intérêts et des politiques de Pêches et Océans Canada, c'est-à-dire les
sciences halieutiques et aquatiques.
Les rapports techniques peuvent être cités comme des publications à part entière. Le titre exact
figure au-dessus du résumé de chaque rapport. Les rapports techniques sont résumés dans la base de
données Résumés des sciences aquatiques et halieutiques.
Les rapports techniques sont produits à l'échelon régional, mais numérotés à l'échelon national. Les
demandes de rapports seront satisfaites par l'établissement auteur dont le nom figure sur la couverture et
la page du titre.
Les numéros 1 à 456 de cette série ont été publiés à titre de Rapports techniques de l'Office des
recherches sur les pêcheries du Canada. Les numéros 457 à 714 sont parus à titre de Rapports techniques
de la Direction générale de la recherche et du développement, Service des pêches et de la mer, ministère
de l'Environnement. Les numéros 715 à 924 ont été publiés à titre de Rapports techniques du Service
des pêches et de la mer, ministère des Pêches et de l'Environnement. Le nom actuel de la série a été établi
lors de la parution du numéro 925.
Canadian Technical Report of
Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 3371
2020
PHOTO-IDENTIFICATION CATALOGUE AND STATUS OF THE NORTHERN
RESIDENT KILLER WHALE POPULATION IN 2019
by
Jared R. Towers, James F. Pilkington, Brian Gisborne, Brianna M. Wright,
Graeme M. Ellis, John K. B. Ford, and Thomas Doniol-Valcroze
Fisheries and Oceans Canada
Cetacean Research Program
Pacific Biological Station
Nanaimo, BC
V9T 6N7
E-mail: Jared.Towers@dfo-mpo.gc.ca
ii
© Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 2020
Cat. No. Fs97-6/3371E-PDF ISBN 978-0-660-34745-5 ISSN 1488-5379
Correct citation for this publication:
Towers, J.R., Pilkington, J.F., Gisborne, B., Wright, B.M., Ellis, G.M., Ford, J.K.B., and
Doniol-Valcroze, T. 2020. Photo-identification catalogue and status of the
northern resident killer whale population in 2019. Can. Tech. Rep. Fish. Aquat.
Sci. 3371: iv + 69 p.
iii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ABSTRACT ..................................................................................................................... iv!
RÉSUMÉ ......................................................................................................................... iv!
1.0 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................... 1!
2.0 MATERIALS AND METHODS ................................................................................. 2!
2.1!DATA COLLECTION .............................................................................................................. 2!
2.2!DEFINING AGE, SEX, AND DEATH ..................................................................................... 2
2.3!NAMING ................................................................................................................................. 2
2.4!DATA ANALYSIS ................................................................................................................... 3
2.5!DATA PRESENTATION ......................................................................................................... 3
3.0 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION ................................................................................. 3!
4.0 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................................................ 6!
5.0 REFERENCES ......................................................................................................... 6!
APPENDIX ..................................................................................................................... 11!
PHOTO-IDENTIFICATION CATALOGUE OF NORTHERN RESIDENT KILLER WHALES ........ 11!
iv
ABSTRACT
Towers, J.R., Pilkington, J.F., Gisborne, B., Wright, B.M., Ellis, G.M., Ford, J.K.B., and
Doniol-Valcroze, T. 2020. Photo-identification catalogue and status of the
northern resident killer whale population in 2019. Can. Tech. Rep. Fish. Aquat.
Sci. 3371: iv + 69 p.
Censuses of the northern resident killer whale population using photo-
identification have been conducted annually since 1973. These studies are based on
photographic recapture of permanent natural markings on every individual within the
population. In this report, we summarize northern resident killer whale population trends
over the time series of this study and provide a photo-identification catalogue of all
individuals considered to be alive in 2019. This population has grown at a mean annual
rate of 2.2% since 1973 and in 2019 contained a minimum of 310 individuals. Continued
annual photo-identification censusing is a key strategy to accurately document the
abundance, genealogy, sociality, demographics, and health of this threatened
population.
RÉSUMÉ
Towers, J.R., Pilkington, J.F., Gisborne, B., Wright, B.M., Ellis, G.M., Ford, J.K.B., and
Doniol-Valcroze, T. 2020. Photo-identification catalogue and status of the
northern resident killer whale population in 2019. Can. Tech. Rep. Fish. Aquat.
Sci. 3371: iv + 69 p.
Des recensements de la population d’épaulards résidents du nord ont été menés
tous les ans depuis 1973. Ces études reposent sur l'identification de chacun des
individus à partir de photographies de marques naturelles permanentes. Dans le
présent rapport, nous résumons les tendances démographiques de la population
d'épaulards résidents du nord pour toute la durée de l’étude, et présentons un catalogue
de photographies d'identification des individus considérés comme étant en vie en 2019.
Le taux d’accroissement moyen de cette population est de 2,2% par an depuis 1973,
avec un minimum de 310 individus en 2019. Le maintien d’un recensement
photographique annuel constitue une stratégie essentielle pour documenter
l’abondance, la généalogie, la vie sociale, la démographie et la santé de cette
population menacée.
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Killer whales in the coastal waters of British Columbia were first found to be
individually recognizable in 1970 (Spong et al. 1970). Field research using photo-
identification began on these killer whales in 1973 (Bigg et al. 1976) and continues to
the present. Over this time period, photo-identification data has been fundamental in
defining killer whale populations in British Columbia (Bigg 1982; Ford and Ellis 1999;
Ford et al. 1994, 2000), determining their social structure (Bigg et al. 1990; Olesiuk et
al. 1990), distribution and abundance (Ellis et al. 2011; Ford et al. 2014; Towers et al.
2019), and facilitating studies on their behaviours (Morton 1990; Baird and Dill 1995;
Barrett-Lennard et al. 1996; Ford and Ellis 2006; Ford et al. 1998, 2011; Deecke et al.
2010; Wright et al. 2017; Towers et al. 2018), cultures and evolution (Riesch et al. 2012;
Foster et al. 2012; Wright et al. 2016; Whitehead and Ford 2018).
Three ecotypes of killer whale occupy coastal waters off western Canada –
residents, Bigg’s, and offshores. Each of these ecotypes are unique in their morphology
and ecology (Ford 2014). Although their ranges overlap, they do not mix socially and as
a result, are reproductively isolated and genetically distinct (Barrett-Lennard 2000). In
BC, the resident ecotype is composed of two populations that do not intermingle.
Named northern and southern for their usual distribution in relation to each other along
the BC coast, both populations range from southeastern Alaska to outer coast waters
off the continental US (Ford et al. 2017).
The northern and southern resident killer whale communities are composed of
several groups of maternally related individuals that maintain social cohesion over long
time periods (Ford et al. 2000). These social groups, initially referred to as pods and
subpods (Bigg et al. 1987), are now more commonly referred to as matrilines (Towers et
al. 2015). They can contain up to five generations of living individuals (see R5 matriline
in Appendix) and are typically composed of an older female, all her offspring, all the
offspring of her daughters and so forth. Every individual within each matriline shares a
socially learned dialect. The northern resident killer whale community contains three
acoustic clans, each containing matrilines with acoustic similarities and thus, common
maternal ancestry (Ford 1991).
Northern resident killer whales have a strong preference for large salmon,
primarily Chinook and secondarily, chum (Ford et al. 2010; Ford and Ellis 2006). Their
health, survival, and fecundity are correlated with the availability and size of these prey
(Ford et al. 2010; Groskreutz et al. 2019; Murray et al. 2019). Other historic, current, or
emerging threats include live-captures (Bigg and Wolman 1975), intentional shootings
(Hoyt 2019; DFO unpubl. data), acute and chronic acoustic disturbance (Morton and
Symonds 2002; Williams et al. 2013), vessel strikes (Williams and O’Hara 2010; Murray
et al. 2019), entanglement and ingestion of fishing gear (Fisheries and Oceans Canada
2018), and bioaccumulation of contaminants (Ross et al. 2000). These threats,
2
combined with relatively small population size and low reproductive rates (Olesiuk et al.
2005), led to this population being listed as Threatened by the Committee on the Status
of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC) in 2001 and subsequently under
Canada’s Species at Risk Act (SARA). Objectives for the improvement of our
understanding and conservation of this population are provided in the Resident Killer
Whale Recovery Strategy (Fisheries and Oceans Canada 2018). Among them, the
annual photo-identification census is listed as a key technique because most efforts
taken to recover the population are underpinned by knowledge of population health and
size.
Photo-identification data from annual censuses of northern residents have been
published periodically in books and technical reports to provide up-to-date working
documents that present details on the evolving appearances, demographics, size, and
growth trends of the population (Bigg et al. 1987; Ford et al. 1994, 2000; Ellis et al.
2007, 2011; Towers et al. 2015). In this report we provide an update on the size of the
northern resident killer whale population in 2019, its annual growth rate since 1973, and
an updated photo-identification catalogue of all individuals considered alive in 2019.
2.0 MATERIALS AND METHODS
2.1 DATA COLLECTION
Digital identification photographs of northern resident killer whale dorsal fins and
saddle patches were collected perpendicular to the whales’ left sides from small boats
using methods first described by Bigg et al. (1976, 1986) and later updated by Ellis et al.
(2011).
2.2 DEFINING AGE, SEX, AND DEATH
Birth years for northern resident killer whales first documented as adults were
estimated based on known or inferred ages of their known or inferred kin (Bigg et al.
1990). Years of birth for individuals first documented as juveniles or calves were
assigned based on the size of the whale when it was first documented. Individuals were
only considered dead after being absent from several encounters with their closest kin
or preferred travel partners (Olesiuk et al. 2005).
Sexes were confirmed visually in the field from observations of skin pigmentation
on the underside of the body, dorsal fin growth (sprouting males), close association with
newborn offspring (reproductive females), or DNA from genetic samples (DFO 2019). If
an animal of unknown sex reaches 15 years of age without sprouting or producing a
calf, it is assumed to be female until otherwise confirmed.
2.3 NAMING
3
Individuals are named with an alphanumeric designation based on the letter of
the pod they belong to and the order in which they were first identified. Matrilines are
named after the eldest living reproductive female within a group of maternally related
individuals, although if she has a surviving brother or uncle, the matriline is named after
the deceased mother of the eldest male (Towers et al. 2015). Pod names refer to the
most distinctive whale documented in each social group when they were first identified
in the early 1970s (Bigg et al. 1987). Each clan bears the same letter as the most
abundant pod within it.
2.4 DATA ANALYSIS
Identification metadata were individually applied to all images of northern resident
killer whales on an annual basis as per data analysis and management techniques
provided in Towers et al. (2012). Population size was calculated as the minimum
number of individuals alive each year, assuming that all whales missing from censused
matrilines were dead and that all uncensused individuals were alive (DFO 2019).
2.5 DATA PRESENTATION
The appendix includes identification photographs of whales known or presumed
to be alive at the end of the 2019 field season with the inclusion of two individuals (I26
and I42) considered missing in 2019. Individuals are laid out by generation, in order of
birth, and in relation to maternal kin. Clusters often represent socially cohesive groups,
however, some individuals may or may not exhibit social cohesion with others in their
matriline (Ford and Ellis 2002; Towers et al. 2015). Tabs are provided on the outside
edge of each page indicating the acoustic clan to which each group belongs. Schematic
diagrams portray matrilineal genealogical relationships that have been inferred from
long-term observations of social associations (Bigg et al. 1987; Ford et al. 1994, 2000;
Ellis et al. 2007, 2011; Towers et al. 2015). They include every individual documented
over the course of the study with the exception of matrilines that no longer contain any
living members. Clear boxes represent individuals known or presumed to be alive in
2019 and shaded boxes represent deceased individuals. Known or estimated birth
years are listed above each identification photograph and below each shaded box. If
known, sexes are indicated with symbols above each identification photograph and
within each schematic box. Lines linking mothers and offspring are solid if the
relationship is positive (i.e., known with certainty). This includes individuals that have
been documented since birth. Relationships between whales born before the study
began in the early 1970s are not known with certainty and are either probable, indicated
by a dashed line, or possible, indicated by a dotted line.
3.0 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Since the last northern resident killer whale photo-identification catalogue and
population update was published in 2015 (Towers et al. 2015) we have traveled several
4
thousand kilometres each year in search of northern resident killer whales. We located
them an average of 60 times per year (range: 39-82) and analyzed a total of 51,696
identification photos between 2015 and 2019. These are similar levels of effort,
encounters, and data as in previous census years (Bigg 1982; Ellis et al. 2011; Towers
et al. 2015).
Complete accounting of all northern resident killer whales within a census year is
rare. As a result, there is occasionally some uncertainty in the total population size in a
given year. Between 2015 and 2019 we accounted for all northern resident killer whales
at an average of 93% (range: 83%- 99%) of the population each year. Any uncertainty
in statuses of individuals in a matriline were typically clarified whenever that matriline
was next encountered. In 2019, one matriline (R17) was not encountered, but assuming
all 12 individuals within it were alive, the minimum population size for northern resident
killer whales was 310 individuals (range: 310-314).
Figure 1. Abundance trend of the northern resident killer whale population from 1973-
2019. Uncertainties in minimum and maximum population sizes are represented
with shading.
Between 1973 and 2019, the northern resident killer whale population
experienced periods of both growth and decline (Figure 1). The 7% decline in
population size between 1998 and 2001 coincided with a reduction in the abundance of
5
primary prey for this population, Chinook salmon (Ford et al. 2010). Immature
individuals that survived this period experienced constrained growth and have
significantly shorter maximum body lengths than individuals that matured before this
decline (Groskreutz et al. 2019). Since 2002, no annual decline in total numbers was
documented until 2018 when the northern resident population showed a growth rate of -
0.3% (DFO 2019).
Figure 2. Abundance trends of the northern resident killer whale clans from 1973-2019.
Uncertainties in minimum and maximum population sizes are represented with
shading.
The mean rate of annual growth for the northern resident population over the time
series of this study is 2.2%. G clan had the greatest mean annual growth rate of 2.8%,
followed by R clan at 2.4% and A clan at 1.9% (Figure 2). However, over the last five
years G clan has shown the lowest annual mean growth rate (-0.2%), followed by A clan
(2.2%) and R clan (4.0%). These trends are likely influenced by a suite of factors from
changing demographics within each clan to the availability of preferred prey and the
ability of individuals to withstand both chronic and acute threats within their
environment. Continued population censusing using photo-identification will continue to
improve our understanding of northern resident killer whale population health and the
impacts that anthropogenically and environmentally influenced changes may have on it.
6
4.0 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Over the years, people too numerous to list have contributed to this long-term
study. We thank them all. In particular, we express our gratitude to the following
individuals who have provided images used in this report: Robin Abernethy, Lance
Barrett-Lennard, Mark Malleson, Christie McMillan, Miguel Neves dos Reis, Stephen
Page, Nicole Robinson, Lisa Spaven, Eva Stredulinsky, and Sara Tavares. Other
individuals who have assisted with or contributed to this study since the publication of
the last photo-identification catalogue include: Jim Borrowman, Ali Bowker, Troy Bright,
Miray Campbell, Ivan Dubinsky, Elysanne Durand, John Durban, Archie Dundas, Dave
Ellifrit, Holly Fearnbach, Sarah Fortune, Katy Gavrilchuk, Mike Greenfelder, Muriel
Hallé, Karen Hansen, Jackie Hildering, Stan Hutchings, Lisa Larsson, Jeff Litton, Bill
and Donna Mackay, Dena Matkin, Kai Meyer, Albert Michaud, Hermann Mueter, Linda
Nichol, Bruce Paterson, Kathy Peavey, Tasli Shaw, Nick Sinclair, Dylan Smyth, Paul
Spong, Gary Sutton, Helena Symonds, Sheila Thornton, Andrew Trites, Jane Watson,
and Janie Wray. We are also grateful for support and cooperation from the following
organizations: BC Cetacean Sightings Network, Canadian Coast Guard, Center for
Whale Research, CetaceaLab, Coastal Ocean Research Institute, Gitga’at First Nation,
Langara Fishing Lodge, MERS Marine Education and Research Society, Marine
Mammal Research Unit (UBC), North Coast Cetacean Society, North Island Marine
Mammal Stewardship Association, Ocean Wise, OrcaLab, and the Strawberry Isle
Marine Research Society. Finally, we thank Elysanne Durand for conducting a review of
the appendix in this report and apologize to anyone we missed. Since 2001, major
funding for this research has been provided by the Species at Risk program of Fisheries
and Oceans Canada and most field work was conducted under DFO Marine Mammal
Research License 001.
5.0 REFERENCES
Baird, R.W. and Dill, L.M. 1995. Occurrence and behaviour of transient killer whales:
seasonal and pod-specific variability, foraging behaviour, and prey handling.
Can. J. Zool. 73: 1300-1311.
Barrett-Lennard, L.G. 2000. Population structure and mating patterns of killer whales
(Orcinus orca) as revealed by DNA analysis. Ph.D. Thesis, University of British
Columbia, Vancouver, BC. xi + 97 p.
Barrett-Lennard, L.G., J.K.B. Ford and K. Heise. 1996. The mixed blessing of
echolocation: Differences in sonar use by fish-eating and mammal-eating killer
whales. Anim. Behav. 51: 553-565.
Bigg, M.A. 1982. An assessment of killer whale (Orcinus orca) stocks off Vancouver
7
Island, British Columbia. Rep. Int. Whal. Commn. 32: 655-666.
Bigg, M.A. and Wolman, A.A. 1975. Live-capture killer whale (Orcinus orca) fishery,
British Columbia and Washington, 1962-73. J. Fish. Res. Bd. Can. 32: 1213-
1221.
Bigg, M.A., Ellis, G.M. and Balcomb, K.C. 1986. The photographic identification of
individual cetaceans. Whalewatcher J. Amer Cetacean Soc. 20(2): 10-12.
Bigg, M.A., Ellis, G.M., Ford, J.K.B. and Balcomb, K.C. 1987. Killer Whales: A Study of
their Identification, Genealogy and Natural History in British Columbia and
Washington State. Phantom Press and Publishers, Nanaimo, BC. 79 p.
Bigg, M.A., MacAskie, I.B. and Ellis, G. 1976. Abundance and movements of killer
whales off eastern and southern Vancouver Island with comments on
management. Unpubl. Rep., Arctic Biological Station, Dept. of Fisheries and
Environment, Ste Anne-de-Bellevue, Quebec.
Bigg, M.A., Olesiuk, P.F., Ellis, G.M., Ford, J.K.B. and Balcomb, K.C.III. 1990. Social
organization and genealogy of resident killer whales (Orcinus orca) in the
coastal waters of British Columbia and Washington State. Rep. Int. Whal.
Commn. Special Issue 12: 383-405.
Deecke, V.B., Barrett-Lennard, L.G., Spong, P. and Ford, J.K.B. 2010. The structure of
stereotyped calls reflects kinship and social affiliation in resident killer whales
(Orcinus orca). Naturwissenschaften. DOI 10.1007/s00114-010-0657-z.
DFO. 2019. Population Status Update for the Northern Resident Killer Whale (Orcinus
orca) in 2018. DFO Can. Sci. Advis. Sec. Sci. Resp. 2019/025.
Ellis, G.M., Ford, J.K.B. and Towers, J.R., 2007. Northern Resident Killer Whales in
British Columbia: Photo-Identification Catalogue 2007. Pacific Biological Station,
Nanaimo. ii + 38 p.
Ellis, G.M., Towers, J.R. and Ford, J.K.B. 2011. Northern resident killer whales of
British Columbia: Photo-identification catalogue and population status to 2010.
Can. Tech. Rep. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2942: v + 71 p.
Fisheries and Oceans Canada. 2018. Recovery Strategy for the Northern and
Southern Resident Killer Whales (Orcinus orca) in Canada [Proposed]. Species
at Risk Act Recovery Strategy Series, Fisheries & Oceans Canada, Ottawa, x +
84 pp.
Ford, J.K.B. 1991. Vocal traditions among resident killer whales (Orcinus orca) in
8
coastal waters of British Columbia. Can. J. Zool. 69: 1454-1483.
Ford, J.K.B. 2014. Marine Mammals of British Columbia. Royal BC Museum
Handbook. Royal British Columbia Museum. Victoria, BC. 464 p.
Ford, J.K.B. and G.M. Ellis. 1999. Transients: Mammal-Hunting Killer Whales. UBC
Press, Vancouver, British Columbia. 96 p.
Ford, J.K.B. and Ellis, G.M. 2002. Reassessing the social organization of resident killer
whales in British Columbia. Pages 72-75 in the Fourth International Orca
Symposium and Workshop, September 23-28, 2002. CEBC-CNRS, France.
Ford, J.K.B. and Ellis, G.M. 2006. Selective foraging by fish-eating killer whales
Orcinus orca in British Columbia. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 316: 185-199.
Ford, J.K.B., Ellis, G.M. and Balcomb, K.C. 1994. Killer Whales: The Natural History
and Genealogy of Orcinus orca in British Columbia and Washington State. UBC
Press and University of Washington Press, Vancouver, BC and Seattle, WA.
102 p.
Ford, J.K.B., Ellis, G.M. and Balcomb, K.C. 2000. Killer Whales: The Natural History
and Genealogy of Orcinus orca in British Columbia and Washington, Second
edition. UBC Press and University of Washington Press, Vancouver, BC and
Seattle, WA. 104 p.
Ford, J.K.B., Ellis, G.M., Barrett-Lennard, L.G., Morton, A.B., Palm, R.S. and Balcomb,
K.C.III. 1998. Dietary specialization in two sympatric populations of killer whales
(Orcinus orca) in coastal British Columbia and adjacent waters. Can. J. Zool. 76:
1456-1471.
Ford, J.K.B., Ellis, G.M., Matkin, C.O., Wetklo, M.H., Barrett-Lennard, L.G. and Withler,
R.E. 2011. Shark predation and tooth wear in a population of northeastern
Pacific killer whales. Aquat. Biol. 11: 213-224.
Ford, J.K.B., Ellis, G.M., Olesiuk, P.F. and Balcomb, K.C. 2010. Linking killer whale
survival and prey abundance: food limitation in the oceans’ apex predator? Biol.
Letters. 6: 139-142.
Ford, J.K.B., Pilkington, J.F., Reira, A., Otsuki, M., Gisborne, B., Abernethy, R.M.,
Stredulinsky, E.H., Towers, J.R. and Ellis, G.M. 2017. Habitats of Special
Importance to Resident Killer Whales (Orcinus orca) off the West Coast of
Canada. DFO Can. Sci. Advis. Sec. Res. Doc. 2017/035. viii + 57 p.
Ford, J.K.B, Stredulinsky, E.H., Ellis, G.M., Durban, J.W. and Pilkington, J.F. 2014.
9
Offshore Killer Whales in Canadian Pacific Waters: Distribution, Seasonality,
Foraging Ecology, Population Status and Potential for Recovery. DFO Can. Sci.
Advis. Sec. Res. Doc. 2014/088. vii + 55 p.
Foster, E.A., Franks, D.W., Mazzi, S., Darden, S.K., Balcomb, K.C., Ford, J.K.B., and
Croft, D.P. 2012. Adaptive prolonged postreproductive life span in killer whales.
Science. 337: 1313.
Groskreutz, M.J., Durban, J.W., Fearnbach, H., Barrett-Lennard, L.G., Towers, J.R.
and Ford, J.K.B. 2019. Decadal changes in adult size of salmon-eating killer
whales in the eastern North Pacific. Endang. Species Res. 40: 183-188.
Hoyt, E. 2019. Orca: The Whale Called Killer. Fifth Edition. Firefly Books. 320 p.
Morton, A.B. 1990. A quantitative comparison of the behavior of resident and transient
forms of the killer whale off the central British Columbia coast. Rep. Int. Whal.
Commn. Special Issue 12: 245248.
Morton, A.B. and Symonds, H.K. 2002. Displacement of Orcinus orca (L.) by high
amplitude sound in British Columbia, Canada. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 59: 71-80.
Murray, C.C., Hannah, L.C., Doniol-Valcroze, T., Wright, B., Stredulinsky, E., Locke, A.
and R. Lacy. 2019. Cumulative Effects Assessment for Northern and Southern
Resident Killer Whale Populations in the Northeast Pacific. DFO Can. Sci.
Advis. Sec. Res. Doc. 2019/056. x + 88 p.
Olesiuk, P.F., Bigg, M.A. and Ellis, G.M. 1990. Life history and population dynamics of
resident killer whales (Orcinus orca) in the coastal waters of British Columbia
and Washington State. Rep. Int. Whal. Commn. Special Issue 12: 209-242.
Olesiuk, P.F., Ellis, G.M. and Ford, J.K.B. 2005. Life history and population dynamics
of northern resident killer whales (Orcinus orca) in British Columbia. DFO Can.
Sci. Advis. Sec. Res. Doc. 2005/045. iv + 75 p.
Riesch, R., Barrett-Lennard, L.G., Ellis, G.M., Ford, J.K.B. and Deecke, V.B. 2012.
Cultural traditions and the evolution of reproductive isolation: ecological
speciation in killer whales? Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 106: 1-17.
Ross, P.S., Ellis, G.M., Ikonumou, M.G., Barrett-Lennard, L.G. and Addison, R.F. 2000.
High PCB concentrations in free-ranging Pacific Killer Whales, Orcinus orca:
effects of age, sex and dietary preference. Mar. Pollute. Bull. 40: 504-515.
Spong, P., Bradford, J. and White, D. 1970. Field studies of the behaviour of the killer
whale (Orcinus orca). Proc. 7th Ann. Conf. on Biol. Sonar and Diving Mammals.
169-174.
Towers, J.R., Ellis, G.M. and Ford, J.K.B. 2015. Photo-identification catalogue and
status of the northern resident killer whale population in 2014. Can. Tech. Rep.
Fish. Aquat. Sci. 3139: iv + 75 p.
Towers, J.R., Ford, J.K.B., and Ellis, G.M. 2012. Digital photo-identification dataset
management and analysis: Testing protocols using a commercially available
application. Can. Tech. Rep. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2978: iv + 16 p.
Towers, J.R., Hallé, M.J., Symonds, H.K., Sutton, G.J., Morton, A.B., Spong, P.,
Borrowman, J.P. and Ford, J.K.B. 2018. Infanticide in a mammal-eating killer
whale population. Sci. Rep. 8: 4366.
Towers, J.R., Sutton, G.J., Shaw, T.J.H., Malleson, M., Matkin, D., Gisborne, B., Forde,
J., Ellifrit, D., Ellis, G.M., Ford, J.K.B., and Doniol-Valcroze, T. 2019. Photo-
identification catalogue, population status, and distribution of Bigg’s killer whales
known from coastal waters of British Columbia, Canada. Can. Tech. Rep. Fish.
Aquat. Sci. 3311: vi + 299 p.
Whitehead, H. and Ford, J.K.B. 2018. Consequences of culturally-driven ecological
specialization: killer whales and beyond. J. Theor. Biol. 456: 279-294.
Williams, R., Erbe, C., Ashe, E., Beerman, A. and Smith, J. 2013. Severity of killer
whale behavioural responses to ship noise: A dose-response study. Mar.
Pollute. Bull. 79: 254-260.
Williams, R. and O’Hara, P. 2010. Modelling ship strike risk to fin, humpback and killer
whales in British Columbia, Canada. J. Cetacean Res. Manage. 11: 1-8.
Wright, B.M., Ford, J.K.B., Ellis, G.M., Deecke, V.B., Shapiro, A.D., Battaile, B.C., and
Trites, A.W. 2017. Fine-scale foraging movements by fish-eating killer whales
(Orcinus orca) relate to the vertical distributions and escape responses of
salmonid prey (Oncorhynchus spp.). Mov. Ecol. 1: 1181.
Wright, B.M., Stredulinsky, E.H., Ellis, G.M., and Ford, J.K.B. 2016. Kin-directed food
sharing promotes lifetime natal philopatry of both sexes in a population of fish
eating killer whales, Orcinus orca. Anim. Behav. 115: 81-95.
11
APPENDIX
Photo-identication catalogue of northern resident killer whales
12
A55 1990 A62 1994
A912009 A107 2013
A83 2005
A-Clan
A1 Pod,
A34 Matriline
13
A67 1997
A102 2012
A80 2004 A96 2010
A34 1975
A-Clan
A112 2016
A12
A33
1971
A34
A62 A55 A74
A31
1960
A67
2000
A96 A80
A107
A91
A83 A112A92
2009
1943
A102
14
A50 1984
A84 2005
A72 1999 A99 2011
A108 2014
A-Clan
A1 Pod,
A50 Matriline
A2
A3
1954
A30
A39 A38 A50 A40 A54
1930
A6
1965 1981
A84 A86 A75 A93
1949
A72 A115
A113
A118
A108
2009
19751971
2017
A99
A101
A106
A120
15
A54 1989
A86 2006
A75 2002 A118 2018
A113 2016
A-Clan
A101 2012 A120 2019
A106 2013
A1 Pod,
A54 Matriline
16
A70 1999
A52 1987
A105 2013
A81 2004 A111 2016
A-Clan
A4 Pod,
A35 Matriline
A100 2011
17
A35 1974
A90 2008A77 2003
A56 1990
A4 Pod,
A56 Matriline
A117 2017
A-Clan
A11
A70 A59
A35
A77
A13 A56
A48
1992
1983
A65
1996
A87
1978
A117
A52
A82
2004
A105
2007
A97
A111A76
2002
A81
1959
2010
A100
A90
18
A73 2000
A116 2017
A4 Pod,
A24 Matriline
A-Clan
A104 2013
19
A-Clan
A64 1995
A110 2015
A94 2009
A78 2003
A89 2008
A45
A41 A53A49
1988
A58
1992198519831981
A68
1997
A73
A116
A10
1942
A4
1954
A19
1973
A24 A47
1983
A64 A71 A94 A78
A110
1967
A104
A89
1999
20
A60 1992
A43 1981
A69 1997
A95 2009 A109 2014
A16 A27 A21
1972
A43 A29 A60
197719671964
A63
1995
A69
A95
A7
1927
A23
1948
A109
A5 Pod,
A23 Matriline
A-Clan
21
A-Clan
A61 1994
A85 2005
A5 Pod,
A25 Matriline
A121 2019
A17 A25 A18
1972
A15
197919691964
A14
1948
A51 A61
A85 A98
1986
2010
A121
22
A-Clan
A42 1980
A79 2004
A66 1996 A88 2008 A114 2017
A5 Pod,
A42 Matriline
A103 2013
A119 2018
A9
A5
1960
A26
A42 A28
A8
1959
A66 A79
A57
1942
1972
A88
1991
1974
A114
A119
A103
23
A-Clan
B1 Pod,
B7 Matriline
B14 1991
B17 2008
B16 2004
B7 1949
B19 2014
B10 1979 B13 1987
B3
B1 B6 B5
1973196419601953
B7
B10 B12 B14 B13
B2
1954
B11
1929
B8
1965 1984
B15
B17 B18
1995
B16 B19
2008
24
C16 1989
C31 2009 C27 2006
A-Clan
C1 Pod,
C6 Matriline
25
C8 1975
C22 1997 C34 2013
C14 1985
A-Clan
C4 C7 C3
1954
1934
C1 C6
1953
C14 C18 C12
1979
C8 C9
1972
C22 C25C21
1994
C19
2004
C31 C27
C16
1953
1956
1991
C34
1991
26
C131985
C32 2013 C36 2019
A-Clan
C1 Pod,
C10 Matriline
C28 2007
27
C10 1972
C23 1998
C35 2015
C26 2004 C30 2009
C33 2014
A-Clan
C29 2009
C2
C11 C10 C15
196419581946
C5
1924
C20 C17 C23 C26
C13
C24 C28
C30
1993
C35
1989
C36 C33
2000
C32 C29
28
D12 1982
D20 1999
D29 2014
D9 1972
A-Clan
D1 Pod,
D12 Matriline
D1 Pod,
D9 Matriline
Since the death of C19,
C31 has been travelling
with D9.
29
D12
D20
D29
D9 D8 D4
1960
D16 D18
1995
1968
1987
D15
1987
D13 1984
D23 2005D19 1998 D32 2018
D7
1943
D10 D13
D24
2006
D19 D27
1978
D32
A-Clan
D1 Pod,
D13 Matriline
D30
2015
D23
D27 2012
30
D17 1990
D26 2010D21 2005
D11 1975
D25 2007 D28 2013
A-Clan
D1 Pod,
D11 Matriline
D31 2015
D3 D1
1938
D2 D11D5
19641956
D22D17 D25 D14
20051987
D26 D31
1954
D28
D21
31
H9 1988
H16 2012H12 2002
H5 1973
H13 2004
H17 2013
H15 2008
H6 H1
1943
H3 H5
H2
19661960
H7 H10H4
19861975
H11
1981
H8
1994
H14
2005
H9
H15
H12
2000
H13
1954
H16
H17
A-Clan
H1 Pod,
H5 Matriline
32
I97 2002
I131 2010I112 2006
I54 1983
I71 1993 I142 2013
A-Clan
I1 Pod,
I19 Matriline
e I19 matriline does not
always travel as a cohesive
group.
33
I92 1999
I155 2017
I117 2005 I132 2010
A-Clan
I125 2008
I19
I70I56 I92 I117
I54
I97 I114
I132
1993
I155
I23
1974
1986
I71
I112 I131
I81
1997
I142
2006
1969
I125
34
I116 2006
I69 1991
I140 2013
I113 2006
I40
I156I90 I82
I116
I69
I140
I1 I3
1953 1956
I139I113
I115
20051994
A-Clan
I1 Pod,
I40 Matriline
I133
I162
I162 2019
35
I40 1980
I133 2010I90 1999
I139 2012
I156 2017
I22 1966
I121 2007
I2 Pod,
I22 Matriline
I14 I5 I22 I8 I28
I39 I55
1965 1974
I2
1929
1987
I121
1956 1956
1980
A-Clan
Individuals in the I40
matriline are not always
found together.
36
I91 1996
I26 1975
I118 2006
I93 1992 I148 2014
I18 Pod,
I17 Matriline
A-Clan
37
I26
I91 I118
I93
I60
1987
I148
I50 1983
I100 2003 I130 2010
I89 1996 I147 2014
I50
I100 I130I89 I147
I38
1980
I50 and her ospring are
not always found with the
rest of the I17 matriline.
I151
2015
A-Clan
38
I17
I57 I99
I158
I87
1996
I88
2000
I127
2008
I149
I99 2003
I57 1989
I158 2016
I17 1960
I149 2014
I124 2007
I163 2019
I163
I124
I18 Pod,
I17 Matriline
continued
A-Clan
39
I134 2010
I21 1979
I119 2006 I157 2018
I18 Pod,
I18 Matriline
I150 2014
A-Clan
40
I20 1965
I101 2003I83 1997
I141 2013
I126 2008
A-Clan
I18 Pod,
I18 Matriline
continued
I52 1986
I160 2019
41
A-Clan
I48 1983
I24 1980
I96 2002
I53 1986
I24, her progeny, and
I53 do not oen travel
with others in the I18
matriline.
I152 2015
I20
I66 I83 I21
I119 I126 I95
I84
1996
I52
1991
I101
2001
I134 I141I157
I59I48
I7
1969
1988
I18
I24 I53
I120
I49
1976
I58
1989
I73
1992
I96
1948
2007
I152
I160
I150
42
G37 1984
G63 1999 G80 2006
G109 2015
G105 2012
G-Clan
G1 Pod,
G3 Matriline
G93 2010 G118 2019
G37
G106
G105
G80
G48
G109
G63 G116 G83
G93 G118
43
G48 1990
G106 2013 G116 2018
G-Clan
G83 2007
G61
1998
G56
1994
G20
G69 G73 G92
G3
G22 G32
G51
G19
1976
G44
1989
G68
G1
G81
G86
G74
2005
2001
1954
G107 G108
G114
G104
G37, G48, and their
progeny are sometimes
observed separate from
others in the G20 lineage.
44
G51 1992
G81 2006 G108 2014
G-Clan
G1 Pod,
G3 Matriline
continued
G201972
G692001 G73 2004 G92 2009
G107 2014
45
G22 1979
G114 2017 G32 1982
G3 1957
G104 2012G86 2008
G-Clan
G22 and her progeny do
not always travel with
others in the G3 matriline.
46
G52 1993
G39 1986
G1 Pod,
G16 Matriline
G46 1991
G72 2005
G1 Pod,
G46 Matriline
G5
1959
G29
G90
G45
1988
G46
G72
G30
1917
G24
1942
2008
1971
G-Clan
47
G31 1981
G54 1994 G84 2007 G96 2011
G103 2012
G11
1963
G16
G39 G52
G94
1972
G91
2008 2010
G18
1947
G31
G54 G66 G84
G85
1999
2008
G103
G96
G-Clan
G1 Pod,
G31 Matriline
48
G60 1998 G78 2004
G-Clan
G1 Pod,
G17 Matriline
G65 and G38 are oen
found separate from
others in the G17
matriline. Similarly, G60
and G78 normally travel
together independent of
their other maternal kin.
G25 G9
1966
G78 G87G40 G57 G60
1975
200819921987
G7 G17
G38 G23
G59 G50 G65 G79
1950 1954
1992
G102
2013
G97
2011
G110
49
G59 1995 G79 2005G65 2001
G50 1991
G38 1986
G-Clan
G110 2015
50
G702003 G89 2008
G71 2005 G98 2011
G-Clan
G12 Pod,
G2 Matriline
G34
G70 G89
G49
G71
G55
1994
1977
G98
G2
G36G28 G43 G53 G77
1985
G117
1981 1989
G101
1990
G82 G113
51
G21963
G772005
G53 1994
G101 2012 G117 2019
G-Clan
G82 2007 G113 2017
Individuals in the G2
matriline are not always
found together.
52
G62 1999
G-Clan
G12 Pod,
G62 Matriline
G88 2008
G12 Pod,
G27 Matriline
G112 2017
G8
1971
G35 G62
19901985
G47
G33 G27
G58
G41 G64 G76
G88 G111
2016
1979
G42
1986
G12
1956
G115 G99
G100
G112 G75
2005
1987
G95
1974
53
G76 2005G64 2000G58 1996 G100 2012
G115 2017 G99 2012
G-Clan
G95 2011
e G27 matriline does
not always travel as a
cohesive group.
54
I12 1971
I105 2004 I138 2012
G-Clan
I11 Pod,
I11 Matriline
I42 1983
I13 1974
I108 2005
I12
I78 I105
I47 I138
I11
I13
I108 I75
1995
I37
1979
I64
I42
I135
2011
1955
1990
1985 1997
55
G-Clan
I51 1986
I129 2009
I106 2004
I128 2009
I98 2002
I144 2014
I11 Pod,
I16 Matriline
I16
I72 I85 I43
I129
I106
I128I109I51
1993
I98
200619981983
I144
I154
2016
1969
56
G-Clan
I27 1974
I77 1997 I107 2004
I27
I63 I77 I107
I143
2014
1990
I11 Pod,
I27 Matriline
I4
I76 I102
I15
1953
I44 I41 I65
1985
I103
1980
I122 I145
I153
2016
I161
2019
2003
57
G-Clan
I4 1980
I76 1997 I102 2003
I11 Pod,
I4 Matriline
58
G-Clan
I65 1990
I122 2007 I145 2014
I11 Pod,
I65 Matriline
59
I62 1988
I33 1971
I110 2006
I45 1985
I33
I79 I94
I45 I62
1997
I110
2001
I32
1964
I31 Pod,
I33 Matriline
I123 I104
I35
I61 I67 I74
1988 1994
I86
1998
I146
I137
I46 I68
I80
1997
I36
1980
I111
2006
I31
1948
1985
I136
I159
2019 1991
G-Clan
60
I35 1974
I123 2007
I104 2002 I137 2012
I146 2014
I31 Pod,
I35 Matriline
I68 1991
I136 2012
I31 Pod,
I68 Matriline
G-Clan
61
R73 2019
R29 1994
R63 2015
R1 Pod,
R5 Matriline
R54 2010R482006
R72 2019
R-Clan
62
R39 2001
R35 1998
R55 2010 R69 2018
R74 2019R65 2015 R59 2013
R1 Pod,
R5 Matriline
continued
R-Clan
63
R22 1984
R50 2007R44 2004 R58 2011
R22 and her progeny are
seldom observed in the
presence of others in the
R4 lineage.
R68 2018
R66 2015
R73
R63 R55
R44 R58
R29 R39 R35
R65
R50
R54
R48
R72
R74 R59 R69
R22
R66
R68
R-Clan
64
R36 1998
R4 1965
R41 2002
R33 1995
R26 1988
R61 2014
R4
R33 R36 R41 R28 R26
R61
R-Clan
1992
R1 Pod,
R5 Matriline
continued
65
R18 1968
R46 2004
R37 1999
R25 1987
R19 R20
19791975
R18
R25 R37
R21 R46
1982
R31 R32 R40 R45
1997 2004
R51 R56
R62
R-Clan
R18 and her ospring are
usually found travelling
independent of others in
the R5 matriline.
R31 1997
R30
R5
R24
R64
66
R24 1987
R56 2011
R40 2001
R30 1994
R5 1949
R51 2008
R62 2014
R-Clan
R1 Pod,
R5 Matriline
continued
R64 2015
67
R13 1979
R47 2005
R7
R11
R8
1962
R13
R47
1973
1946
R57 2011
R57
R-Clan
R1 Pod,
R13 Matriline
R71 2019
R71
68
R42 2002 R49 2006R38 2000
R60 2013
R17
R34 R43
R27
1990
R23
R49 R67R38
R60
R42
R52 2009
R52
R-Clan
R1 Pod,
R17 Matriline
R70 2018
R70
R53
69
R23 1985
R67 2016
R34 1996
R17 1971
R43 2002
R-Clan
R53 2009
R17 and her male
ospring do not always
travel with R23 and her
progeny.
... Southern residents Fish (mainly salmon) (Ford & Ellis, 2006) 4.33 (1-16) (Center for Whale Research) Natal philopatry of males and females, nonlocal mating (Bigg et al., 1987) (but see Ford et al. (2018)) Northern residents Fish (mainly salmon) (Ford & Ellis, 2006) 6.5 (1-19) (Towers et al., 2020) Natal philopatry of males and some females, nonlocal mating (Barrett-Lennard & Ellis, 2001;Bigg et al., 1987) Bigg's West Coast Transients (WCT) (Sharpe et al., 2019) Marine mammals (mainly pinnipeds and small cetaceans) (Ford & Ellis, 1999) 3.9 (1-8) (Towers et al., 2019) Some dispersal of males and females from natal group, non-local mating inferred (Baird & Whitehead, 2000;Ford & Ellis, 1999) born into a social unit ("matriline") consisting of their mother, siblings, and other more distant relatives . As they age, their own sons replace more distantly related males in the matriline, increasing their average local relatedness to the group over time . ...
... Both populations of residents are specialist fish-eaters with salmon making up almost all of their prey Olesiuk et al., 1990), whereas Bigg's killer whales are specialized in hunting marine mammals (Ford & Ellis, 1999). This differentiation in diet is reflected in the social behavior of the ecotypes with resident killer whales typically being observed traveling in larger social groups consisting of several maternal groups, compared with Bigg's killer whales (Towers et al., 2019(Towers et al., , 2020. The mean group size of cohesive maternal groups however is similar for the two ecotypes (Table 1; Towers et al., 2020). ...
... This differentiation in diet is reflected in the social behavior of the ecotypes with resident killer whales typically being observed traveling in larger social groups consisting of several maternal groups, compared with Bigg's killer whales (Towers et al., 2019(Towers et al., , 2020. The mean group size of cohesive maternal groups however is similar for the two ecotypes (Table 1; Towers et al., 2020). In resident killer whales, there is almost no dispersal of males and limited dispersal of females from the maternal group. ...
Preprint
The extended female post-reproductive lifespan found in humans and some toothed whales remains an evolutionary puzzle. Theory predicts demographic patterns resulting in increased female relatedness with age (kinship dynamics) can select for a prolonged post-reproductive lifespan due to the combined costs of inter-generational reproductive conflict and benefits of late-life helping. Here we test this prediction using >40 years of longitudinal demographic data from the sympatric yet genetically distinct killer whale ecotypes: resident and Bigg’s killer whales. The female relatedness with age is predicted to increase in both ecotypes, but with a less steep increase in Bigg’s due to their different social structure. Here, we show that there is a significant post-reproductive lifespan in both ecotypes with >30% of adult female years being lived as post-reproductive, supporting the general prediction that an increase in local relatedness with age predisposes the evolution of a post-reproductive lifespan. Differences in the magnitude of kinship dynamics however, did not influence the timing or duration of the post-reproductive lifespan with females in both ecotypes terminating reproduction before their mid-40s followed by an expected post-reproductive period of ~20 years. Our results highlight the important role of kinship dynamics in the evolution of a long post-reproductive lifespan in long-lived mammals, while further implying that the timing of menopause may be a robust trait that is persistent despite substantial variation in demographic patterns among population.
... Southern residents Fish (mainly salmon) (Ford & Ellis, 2006) 4.33 (1-16) (Center for Whale Research) Natal philopatry of males and females, nonlocal mating (Bigg et al., 1987) (but see Ford et al. (2018)) Northern residents Fish (mainly salmon) (Ford & Ellis, 2006) 6.5 (1-19) (Towers et al., 2020) Natal philopatry of males and some females, nonlocal mating (Barrett-Lennard & Ellis, 2001;Bigg et al., 1987) Bigg's West Coast Transients (WCT) (Sharpe et al., 2019) Marine mammals (mainly pinnipeds and small cetaceans) (Ford & Ellis, 1999) 3.9 (1-8) (Towers et al., 2019) Some dispersal of males and females from natal group, non-local mating inferred (Baird & Whitehead, 2000;Ford & Ellis, 1999) born into a social unit ("matriline") consisting of their mother, siblings, and other more distant relatives . As they age, their own sons replace more distantly related males in the matriline, increasing their average local relatedness to the group over time . ...
... Both populations of residents are specialist fish-eaters with salmon making up almost all of their prey Olesiuk et al., 1990), whereas Bigg's killer whales are specialized in hunting marine mammals (Ford & Ellis, 1999). This differentiation in diet is reflected in the social behavior of the ecotypes with resident killer whales typically being observed traveling in larger social groups consisting of several maternal groups, compared with Bigg's killer whales (Towers et al., 2019(Towers et al., , 2020. The mean group size of cohesive maternal groups however is similar for the two ecotypes (Table 1; Towers et al., 2020). ...
... This differentiation in diet is reflected in the social behavior of the ecotypes with resident killer whales typically being observed traveling in larger social groups consisting of several maternal groups, compared with Bigg's killer whales (Towers et al., 2019(Towers et al., , 2020. The mean group size of cohesive maternal groups however is similar for the two ecotypes (Table 1; Towers et al., 2020). In resident killer whales, there is almost no dispersal of males and limited dispersal of females from the maternal group. ...
Article
Full-text available
The extended female postreproductive life span found in humans and some toothed whales remains an evolutionary puzzle. Theory predicts demographic patterns resulting in increased female relatedness with age (kinship dynamics) can select for a prolonged postreproductive life span due to the combined costs of intergenerational reproductive conflict and benefits of late-life helping. Here, we test this prediction using >40 years of longitudinal demographic data from the sympatric yet genetically distinct killer whale ecotypes: resident and Bigg's killer whales. The female relatedness with age is predicted to increase in both ecotypes, but with a less steep increase in Bigg's due to their different social structure. Here, we show that there is a significant postreproductive life span in both ecotypes with >30% of adult female years being lived as postreproductive, supporting the general prediction that an increase in local relatedness with age predisposes the evolution of a postreproductive life span. Differences in the magnitude of kinship dynamics however did not influence the timing or duration of the postreproductive life span with females in both ecotypes terminating reproduction before their mid-40s followed by an expected postreproductive period of about 20 years. Our results highlight the important role of kinship dynamics in the evolution of a long postreproductive life span in long-lived mammals, while further implying that the timing of menopause may be a robust trait that is persistent despite substantial variation in demographic patterns among populations.
Article
Full-text available
Salmon hatcheries are management tools intended to stabilize declining abundance in salmon populations and sustain salmon fisheries. One key area of uncertainty is how hatchery release practices influence juvenile-to-adult survival. Data quality and quantity vary considerably among hatcheries making it difficult to assess the role of release practices. Using a Bayesian hierarchical approach, we analyzed releases and recoveries of Chinook (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha; 21 hatcheries) and coho (Oncorhynchus kisutch; 16 hatcheries) salmon in British Columbia from 1972 to 2017. Higher survival rates were associated with increasing weights-at-release, earlier releases of Chinook salmon, and later releases of coho salmon. The addition of environmental (sea surface temperature, Pacific Decadal Oscillation), and predator (harbour seals, killer whales) covariates did not improve model performance relative to models that used year effects to account for declines in survival and interannual variability in ocean conditions. Optimizing release practices could increase returns by 6%–245% for Chinook salmon and 5%–160% for coho salmon based on median posterior estimates for each hatchery. With these results, a large-scale adaptive management approach could be implemented to test our understanding of release practice–survival relationships and evaluate cost–benefit trade-offs.
Article
Full-text available
For animals that tend to remain with their natal group rather than individually disperse, group sizes may become too large to benefit individual fitness. In such cases, group splitting (or fission) allows philopatric animals to form more optimal group sizes without sacrificing all familiar social relationships. Although permanent group splitting is observed in many mammals, it occurs relatively infrequently. Here, we use combined generalized modeling and machine learning approaches to provide a comprehensive examination of group splitting in a population of killer whales (Orcinus orca) that occurred over three decades. Fission occurred both along and across maternal lines, where animals dispersed in parallel with their closest maternal kin. Group splitting was more common: (1) in larger natal groups, (2) when the common maternal ancestor was no longer alive, and (3) among groups with greater substructuring. The death of a matriarch did not appear to immediately trigger splitting. Our data suggest intragroup competition for food, leadership experience and kinship are important factors that influence group splitting in this population. Our approach provides a foundation for future studies to examine the dynamics and consequences of matrilineal fission in killer whales and other taxa. Significance statement Group living among mammals often involves long-term social affiliation, strengthened by kinship and cooperative behaviours. As such, changes in group membership may have significant consequences for individuals’ fitness and a population’s genetic structure. Permanent group splitting is a complex and relatively rare phenomenon that has yet to be examined in detail in killer whales. In the context of a growing population, in which offspring of both sexes remain with their mothers for life, we provide the first in-depth examination of group splitting in killer whales, where splitting occurs both along and across maternal lines. We also undertake the first comprehensive assessment of how killer whale intragroup cohesion is influenced by both external and internal factors, including group structure, population and group demography, and resource abundance.
Article
Full-text available
Two populations of killer whales aggregate around Vancouver Island to feed primarily on Chinook salmon. Aerial photogrammetry of endangered southern residents has documented some adults growing to smaller lengths in recent decades, suggesting that early growth may have been constrained by low Chinook availability in the 1990s. We investigated whether growth and adult length were also constrained in the more abundant northern residents. Photographs were collected from an unmanned hexacopter at altitudes of 30 to 37 m over 4 yr, 2014 to 2017. Images were linked to 78 individuals of known age and sex based on distinctive saddle patch pigmentation. The length of each whale was estimated by measuring pixel dimensions between both the snout and dorsal fin and the dorsal fin and fluke; these were scaled to real size using camera lens focal length and altitude, determined by a laser or pressure altimeter. Total length, derived by summing the longest (flattest) of each measure, ranged from 2.42 m for a first year calf to 7.45 m for the largest adult male. A Bayesian change point analysis revealed that adult whales <40 yr old were on average shorter by 0.44 m than older adults, which grew to typical lengths of 6.28 and 7.14 m for females and males, respectively. This mirrors the growth trends reported for southern residents, supporting demographic evidence of correlated prey limitation in both populations. The growth data suggest that the effects of nutritional stress are not only acutely lethal but also have long-term consequences for the condition of whales in both populations.
Article
Full-text available
Prolonged life after reproduction is difficult to explain evolutionarily unless it arises as a physiological side effect of increased longevity or it benefits related individuals (i.e., increases inclusive fitness). There is little evidence that postreproductive life spans are adaptive in nonhuman animals. By using multigenerational records for two killer whale (Orcinus orca) populations in which females can live for decades after their final parturition, we show that postreproductive mothers increase the survival of offspring, particularly their older male offspring. This finding may explain why female killer whales have evolved the longest postreproductive life span of all nonhuman animals.
Article
Resident Orcinus orca were seen most often in the summer-fall whereas transient occurrence peaked in the spring and fall. Transient groups were smaller than resident groups. Transients spent more time foraging and dived for longer periods. Residents spent more time playing and resting, and were more vocal. Transients travelled more erratic routes and appeared to have less specific ranges. Only transients were observed eating warm-blooded prey. The 2 races were not seen to mix but did avoid each other. -from Author
Article
Using data from between 1973-4 and 1987, females have a mean life expectancy of 50.2 yr, typically give birth to their first viable calf at 14.9 yr of age, produce an average of 5.35 viable calves over a 25.2 yr reproductive lifespan and have a maximum longevity of c80-90 yr. Calving is diffusely seasonal with most births occurring in October-March. Neonate mortality is c43%. Proportion of mature females pregnant varies from 0.274 in April to 0.411 in September. Males have a mean life expectancy of 29.2 yr, typically attain sexual maturity at 15.0 yr and physical maturity at 21.0 yr of age, and have a maximum longevity of 50-60 yr. The derived life history parameters are used to develop a sex- and age-specific matrix population model and to calculate life tables. -from Authors
Article
Whale displacement by acoustic "pollution" has been difficult to document, even in cases where it is strongly suspected, because noise effects can rarely be separated from other stimuli. Two independent studies on the natural history of killer whales (Orcinus orca) monitored frequency of whale occurrence from January 1985 through December 2000 in two adjacent areas: Johnstone Strait and the Broughton Archipelago. Four high-amplitude, acoustic harassment devices (AHDs) were installed throughout 1993 on already existing salmon farms in the Broughton Archipelago, in attempts to deter predation on fish pens by harbour seals (Phoca vitulina Linnaeus). While whale occurrence was relatively stable in both areas until 1993, it then increased slightly in the Johnstone Strait area and declined significantly in the Broughton Archipelago while AHDs were in use. Both mammal-eating and fish-eating killer whales were similarly impacted. Acoustic harassment ended in the Broughton Archipelago in May 1999 and whale occurrence re-established to baseline levels. This study concludes that whale displacement resulted from the deliberate introduction of noise into their environment.
Article
Human evolution has clearly been shaped by gene–culture interactions, and there is growing evidence that similar processes also act on populations of non-human animals. Recent theoretical studies have shown that culture can be an important evolutionary mechanism because of the ability of cultural traits to spread rapidly both vertically, obliquely, and horizontally, resulting in decreased within-group variance and increased between-group variance. Here, we collate the extensive literature on population divergence in killer whales (Orcinus orca), and argue that they are undergoing ecological speciation as a result of dietary specializations. Although we cannot exclude the possibility that cultural divergence pre-dates ecological divergence, we propose that cultural differences in the form of learned behaviours between ecologically divergent killer whale populations have resulted in sufficient repro-ductive isolation even in sympatry to lead to incipient speciation.
Article
Blubber biopsy samples were obtained for contaminant analysis from two discrete populations of killer whales (Orcinus orca) which frequent the coastal waters of British Columbia, Canada. Detailed life history information for the fish-eating `resident' population, comprising two distinct communities, and the marine mammal-eating `transient' killer whale population, provided an invaluable reference for the interpretation of contaminant concentrations. Total PCB concentrations (sum of 136 congeners detected) were surprisingly high in all three communities, but transient killer whales were particularly contaminated. PCB concentrations increased with age in males, but were greatly reduced in reproductively active females. The absence of age, sex and inter-community differences in concentrations of polychlorinated- dibenzo-p-dioxins (PCDDs) and- dibenzofurans (PCDFs) may have partly reflected low dietary levels, but more importantly, metabolic removal of dioxin-like compounds in killer whales. While information on toxic thresholds does not exist for PCBs in cetaceans, total 2,3,7,8-TCDD Toxic Equivalents (TEQ) in most killer whales sampled easily surpassed adverse effects levels established for harbour seals, suggesting that the majority of free-ranging killer whales in this region are at risk for toxic effects. The southern resident and transient killer whales of British Columbia can now be considered among the most contaminated cetaceans in the world.
Offshore Killer Whales in Canadian Pacific Waters: Distribution, Seasonality, Foraging Ecology, Population Status and Potential for Recovery
Offshore Killer Whales in Canadian Pacific Waters: Distribution, Seasonality, Foraging Ecology, Population Status and Potential for Recovery. DFO Can. Sci. Advis. Sec. Res. Doc. 2014/088. vii + 55 p.
Orca: The Whale Called Killer. Fifth Edition. Firefly Books
  • E Hoyt
Hoyt, E. 2019. Orca: The Whale Called Killer. Fifth Edition. Firefly Books. 320 p.
Cumulative Effects Assessment for Northern and Southern Resident Killer Whale Populations in the Northeast Pacific
  • C C Murray
  • L C Hannah
  • T Doniol-Valcroze
  • B Wright
  • E Stredulinsky
  • A Locke
  • R Lacy
Murray, C.C., Hannah, L.C., Doniol-Valcroze, T., Wright, B., Stredulinsky, E., Locke, A. and R. Lacy. 2019. Cumulative Effects Assessment for Northern and Southern Resident Killer Whale Populations in the Northeast Pacific. DFO Can. Sci. Advis. Sec. Res. Doc. 2019/056. x + 88 p.