Mobility as Speculative Technics of Survivable Architectures

Abstract

This paper aims at investigating how military imaginaries of survivable mobility inform the abstraction of landscapes and the design of vehicular technologies. It addresses the technical and the environmental by drawing on Science and Technology Studies (Latour, Akrich, Callon, Law) and the philosophy of technology of Gilbert Simondon, offering a critique of militarization upon tracing its extended sociotechnical networks. The inquiry follows the design of MRAP-type vehicles employed during the U.S. military’s protracted occupation of Iraq and Afghanistan for concerns of survivability. Through an STS- and ANT-inspired methodology, we trace how architectural and land relations are inscribed in the processes of engineering and testing these vehicles contingent on breakdown against Afghanistan’s rugged landscape, what the military translates as irregular topography, primitive road geometry, boggy materials, and agricultural forms. The paper advances an architectural conception of the MRAP as an enclosed atmospheric capsule that privileges the survival of specific bodies. This capsule, we argue, translates terrain through technics of survivability and enrolls active bodies in protective envelopes across networks of simulation and training, which we can read through an “architectural” (after Yaneva, 2010) lens across the ground as “technical lands” (after Galison, 2017). We trace breakdown stories of rollover, drowning, and bodily traumas as documented in utility patents (shock-absorbing underbelly, blast attenuation seats) military publications (user handbook, medical report, testing standards and procedures), and commercial brochures (driver assist, electronic stability). The paper seeks to expand on notions of land, site, terrain, and the architectural in STS and transdisciplinary studies of space.

Full text

EASST+4S Joint Conference
August 18-21, 2020, Prague
Mobility as Speculative Technics of Survivable Architectures
Fadi Shayya, PhD Candidate, University of Manchester
This paper aims at investigating how military imaginaries of survivable mobility inform the
abstraction of landscapes and the design of vehicular technologies. It addresses the technical and
the environmental by drawing on Science and Technology Studies (Latour, Akrich, Callon, Law)
and the philosophy of technology of Gilbert Simondon, offering a critique of militarization upon
tracing its extended sociotechnical networks. The inquiry follows the design of MRAP-type
vehicles employed during the U.S. military’s protracted occupation of Iraq and Afghanistan for
concerns of survivability. Through an STS- and ANT-inspired methodology, we trace how
architectural and land relations are inscribed in the processes of engineering and testing these
vehicles contingent on breakdown against Afghanistan’s rugged landscape, what the military
translates as irregular topography, primitive road geometry, boggy materials, and agricultural
forms. The paper advances an architectural conception of the MRAP as an enclosed atmospheric
capsule that privileges the survival of specific bodies. This capsule, we argue, translates terrain
through technics of survivability and enrolls active bodies in protective envelopes across
networks of simulation and training, which we can read through an “architectural” (after Yaneva,
2010) lens across the ground as “technical lands” (after Galison, 2017). We trace breakdown
stories of rollover, drowning, and bodily traumas as documented in utility patents (shock-
absorbing underbelly, blast attenuation seats) military publications (user handbook, medical
report, testing standards and procedures), and commercial brochures (driver assist, electronic
stability). The paper seeks to expand on notions of land, site, terrain, and the architectural in STS
and transdisciplinary studies of space.
31. Cosmogrammatics. Nature(s) in planetary designs (link)
Johannes Bruder, FHNW Academy of Art and Design; Gökce Günel, Rice University; Selena
Savic, FHNW Academy of Art and Design
Contact: johannes.bruder@hotmail.com
Keywords: Ecology, Energy, Design, Urban Planning, Geotechnicity
Categories: Engineering and Infrastructure, Environmental/Multispecies Studies, Energy