ArticlePDF Available

تشخيص الفجوة بين بنود المواصفة القياسية الدولية (ISO 31000:2018) وواقع نظام ادارة المخاطر في المركز الوطني للأستشارات الهندسية

Authors:

Abstract

This research aims at diagnosing the size of the gap between the provisions of ISO 31000: 2018 and the actual reality of the risk management system at the National Center for Engineering Consultancy. The research started from the problem that the organization suffers from, and it changed from the previous issue of 2009 to the final version in 2018 and the last changes in the items. The importance of the research came in its actual contribution to find out the application of the provisions of ISO 31000: 2018. Center. The practical aspect of the research has been applied in the National Center for Engineering Consultancy, thus the list of examination has been adopted in the collection of data and information on the items of the standard, as well as personal interviews and access to records and documents related to research. The researchers reached a number of conclusions, The risk management team despite the existence of a form (risk reporting) that allows all third parties, internal use to identify risks.
(ISO 31000: 2018)
ISO 31000: 2018
Abstract
This research aims at diagnosing the size of the gap between the provisions of ISO 31000: 2018
and the actual reality of the risk management system at the National Center for Engineering
Consultancy. The research started from the problem that the organization suffers from, and it
changed from the previous issue of 2009 to the final version in 2018 and the last changes in the
items. The importance of the research came in its actual contribution to find out the application of
the provisions of ISO 31000: 2018 Center. The practical aspect of the research has been applied
in the National Center for Engineering Consultancy, thus the list of examination has been adopted
in the collection of data and information on the items of the standard, as well as personal
interviews and access to records and documents related to research. The researchers reached a
number of conclusions, the risk management team despite the existence of a form (risk reporting)
that allows all third parties, internal use to identify risks.
ISOISO 31000: 2018
ISO / TC 262ISO 31000: 2009
ISO 31000:2018
Diagnosis of the gap between the requirements of the International
Standard (ISO 31000: 2018) and the reality of the risk management
system in the National Center for Engineering Consultations
mohammedalbayati@uomustansiriyah.edu.iq haydersabah35@yahoo.com
ISO 31000: 2018
ISO 31000
ISO 31000: 2018
ISO 31000
ISO 31000: 2018
ISO 31000: 2018
1ISO31000:2018
2
3
1
internet
2
ISO 31000:2018
ISO 31000:2018
1 6
25
34
43
52
61
70
2008
326
ISO31000:2018
2008326-327
xi
fi
fi
6
1
:
-
-
:
(Thao,et.al,2014:38
(Misztal &Belu, 2016:2)
(Tupa ,et
al.,2017:1226)
(Berg,2010:81)
Suroso & Fakhrozi,2018:203
Geessink,2012:9(Ionita,2013:17)
(Ruben,2015:16)
(ISO
31000,2018:2-4)
(ISO 31000:2018)
Nguyen,2007:44
Begum,2009:18
Tupa ,et al.,2017:1226
Thao,et.al,2014:40
.3(Thao,et.al,2014:41
(Erdogan,2015:15)
ISO31000:2018
Source:International Standard Risk Management-Principles& Guidelines ,ISO31000:2018,P.9.
.4
(Purdy,2010:884)
.5
(Berg, 2010:86)
(Purdy, 2010:884)
.6
ISO31000, 2018:14)
(Iacob, 2014:64)
.7
(Ariff,
2014:26)
.8
(ISO 31000,2018:14)
ISO 31000:2018
ISO 31000
Liuksiala,2012:32
(ISO
Misiura,2015:52
ISO31000:2018ISO31000:2009
AS/NZS4360:2004
(Thao,et.al,2014:39
ISO31000:2018:1-4
ISO31000,2009:1
ISO:Guide73:2009
(ISO31000,2009:8)
ISO 31000:2018
1.5
:2.5
2
ISO31000:2018
2
ISO 31000:2018
65 4 3 2 10
1
2
2:2.5
ISO31000:2018(6
: 3.5
3:3.5
ISO31000:2018
3
ISO 31000:2018
65 4 3 2 10
1
2
3:3.5
ISO31000:2018(6
54
1.4.5
4
ISO31000:2018
4
ISO 31000:2018
65 4 3 2 10
1
4
(6
2.4.5
ISO31000:2018
ISO 31000:2018
65 43 2 10
1
ISO31000:2018
(6
3.4.5
ISO31000:2018
ISO 31000:2018
654 3210
1
ISO31000:2018(6
4.4.5
ISO31000:2018
ISO 31000:2018
65 4 321 0
ISO31000:2018
(6
5.4.5
ISO31000:2018
ISO 31000:2018
65 4 321 0
1
(6
5.5
ISO31000:2018
ISO 31000:2018
65 4 321 0
1
ISO31000:2018(6
6.5
ISO31000:2018
ISO 31000:2018
65 4 3 2 10
1
ISO31000:2018(6
7.5
1.7.5
ISO31000:2018
ISO 31000:2018
65 4 3 2 10
1
(6
2.7.5:
ISO31000:2018
ISO 31000:2018
65 4 3 2 1 0
1
(6
6
2.6
ISO31000:2018
ISO 31000:2018
65 4 32 10
1
2
4
2
2(6
3.6
2.3.6
ISO31000:2018
ISO 31000:2018
654 3 2 1 0
1
(6
3.3.6
ISO31000:2018
ISO 31000:2018
65 4 3 2 10
1
(6
4.3.6
ISO31000:2018
ISO 31000:2018
65 43 2 10
1
(6
4.6
1.4.6
ISO31000:2018
ISO 31000:2018
65 4 3 210
1
(6
2.4.6
ISO31000:2018
ISO 31000:2018
654 3 2 1 0
ISO31000:2018(6
3.4.6
ISO31000:2018
ISO 31000:2018
65 4 3 21 0
1
(6
ISO31000:2018
ISO 31000:2018
65 4 3 21 0
1
(6
5.6
2.5.6
ISO31000:2018
ISO 31000:2018
65 4 3 210
1
(6
3.5.6
ISO31000:2018
ISO 31000:2018
65 4321 0
1
(6
6.6
ISO31000:2018
ISO 31000:2018
65432 1 0
1
(6
7.6
ISO31000:2018
ISO 31000:2018
65 432 10
1
(6
ISO31000:2018
ISO31000:2018
ISO 31000:2018
5
:2.5
:3.5
5
2.3.6
ISO 31000:2018
4.89
ISO 31000:2018
.
(ISO31000:2009)
(ISO31000:2018)
SWOT
-[1]
-[2]2008
-[3](ISO 31000:2009)
[4]-Ariff,M,(2014)," A Framework for Risk Management Practices and Organizational
Performance in Higher Education",Integrative Business& Economics,vol (2),pp.(422-432)
[5]-Begum Ongel,(2009),"Assessing Risk Management Maturity: Framework for the Construction
Companies", Master Thesis in building Science in Architecture department, Middle East
Technical University"..
[6]-Berg,H,(2010)," Risk Management: Procedures, Methods and Experiences",
RT&A,vol(1),pp(79-95).
[7]-Erdogan, Gencer,(2015)," Coral: A Model-Based Approach To Risk-Driven Security Testing",
Philosophiae Doctor in Computer Science, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences,
University of Oslo
[8]-Erdogan, Gencer,(2015)," Coral: A Model-Based Approach To Risk-Driven Security Testing",
Philosophiae Doctor in Computer Science, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences,
University of Oslo
[9]-Geessink, Lisette,(2014)," Enterprise Risk Management And Bank Performance During A
Financial Crisis", Master Thesis, Business Administration, Faculty Management and Governance.
[10]-Iacob,V,(2014)," Risk Management And Evaluation And Qualitative Method Within The
Projects",Ecoforum, Vol.(3),No.(1),pp.(60-67).
[11]-Ionita, Dan,(2013)," Current Established Risk Assessment Methodologies and Tools", Master
Thesis, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Department of Computer Science.
[12]-International Standard Risk Management-Principles& Guidelines ,ISO31000:2009.
[13]-International Standard Risk Management-Principles& Guidelines ,ISO31000:2018.
[14]-Liuksiala, Aleksi,(2012)," The Use Of The Risk Management Standard Iso 31000 In Finnish
Organizations", Master Thesis, Insurance Science, University of Tampere School of Management.
[15]-Mehmod, Tahir,(2012)" Integrated Model For Project Risk & Uncertainty Management",
Master of Science in Project Management and Operational Development, School of Industrial
Engineering and Management Examiner.
[16]-Misiura, Anna,(2015)," Enterprise Risk Management in the Airline Industry Risk
Management Structures and Practices", Doctor of Philosophy, Brunel University.
[17]-Misztal,A.& Belu,N.,(2016)," Model of areas for identifying risks influencing the compliance
of technological processes and products", IOPscience,pp.(1-9).
[18]- Risk Management Strategies And Decision Support Tools", Doctor
of Philosophy, The University of Queensland, Gatton, Queensland.
[19]-Purdy,G,(2010)," Iso 31000:2009-Setting A New Standard For Risk Management", Society
For Risk Analysis,Vol.(30),No.(6),pp(881-886).
[20]-Ruben, Bartelink,(2015)," Corporate Real Estate Risk Management", Master Thesis,
Department of Architecture, Building and Planning, Faculty of the Built Environment, Eindhoven
University of Technology.
[21]-Suroso , Jarot S. & Fakhrozi, Muhammad A. ,(2018),"Assessment Of Information System
Risk Management with Octave Allegro At Education Institution",3rd International Conference on
Computer Science and Computational Intelligence 2018, Elsevier Ltd., , vol (135),pp (202_213).
[22]-Thao,H.,& Tiep,N.,& Linh,N,(2014)," Evaluating Risks In Construction Projects Based On
International Risk Management Standard Iso 31000:2009", Infrastructure University Kuala
Lumpur Research Journal,Vol.(2),No.(1),pp(38-50).
[23]-Tupa,j& Simota,j& Steiner,f,(2017)," Aspects of risk management implementation for
Industry 4.0", 27th International Conference on Flexible Automation and Intelligent
Manufacturing, FAIM2017,27-30 June 2017, Modena, Italy Elsevier B.V., vol
(11),pp(1223_1230).
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
Operation of every company is associated with the risk of interfering with proper performance of its fundamental processes. This risk is associated with various internal areas of the company, as well as the environment in which it operates. From the point of view of ensuring compliance of the course of specific technological processes and, consequently, product conformity with requirements, it is important to identify these threats and eliminate or reduce the risk of their occurrence. The purpose of this article is to present a model of areas of identifying risk affecting the compliance of processes and products, which is based on multiregional targeted monitoring of typical places of interference and risk management methods. The model is based on the verification of risk analyses carried out in small and medium-sized manufacturing companies in various industries..
Article
Last year saw the publication of IS0 31000:2009, a new globally accepted standard for risk management together with a new, associated vocabulary in ISO Guide 73:2009. These were developed through a consensus-driven process over four years, through seven drafts, and involving the input of hundreds of risk management professionals around the world. The new standard supports a new, simple way of thinking about risk and risk management and is intended to begin the process of resolving the many inconsistencies and ambiguities that exist between many different approaches and definitions. While most decisionmakers seem to welcome the new standard and it has so far received very good reviews, it does create challenges for those who use language and approaches that are unique to their area of work but different from the new standard and guide. The need for compromise and change is the inevitable consequence of standardization.
Enterprise Risk Management in the Airline Industry Risk Management Structures and Practices
  • Anna Misiura
Misiura, Anna,(2015)," Enterprise Risk Management in the Airline Industry Risk Management Structures and Practices", Doctor of Philosophy, Brunel University.
Corporate Real Estate Risk Management
  • Bartelink Ruben
Ruben, Bartelink,(2015)," Corporate Real Estate Risk Management", Master Thesis, Department of Architecture, Building and Planning, Faculty of the Built Environment, Eindhoven University of Technology.
Assessment Of Information System Risk Management with Octave Allegro At Education Institution
  • Suroso
  • S Jarot
  • Muhammad A Fakhrozi
-Suroso, Jarot S. & Fakhrozi, Muhammad A.,(2018),"Assessment Of Information System Risk Management with Octave Allegro At Education Institution",3rd International Conference on Computer Science and Computational Intelligence 2018, Elsevier Ltd.,, vol (135),pp (202_213).
Evaluating Risks In Construction Projects Based On International Risk Management Standard Iso 31000
  • H -Thao
  • N Tiep
  • N Linh
-Thao,H.,& Tiep,N.,& Linh,N,(2014)," Evaluating Risks In Construction Projects Based On International Risk Management Standard Iso 31000:2009", Infrastructure University Kuala Lumpur Research Journal,Vol.(2),No.(1),pp(38-50).