Cultural Sustainability in Ethnobotanical Research with Students up to K-12

Abstract

In the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), education plays a 10 fundamental role. However, traditional methodologies do not favor the enrichment and personal 11 development essential to promote global awareness. The use of active methodologies based on 12 experiences improve the quality of learning. This work describes the design, implementation, and 13 evaluation of the acquired knowledge of a didactic proposal for non-formal education as a support 14 for regulated education based on botany content. Firstly, a workshop was held, where young people 15 participated directly in developing field work with a real scientific methodology. Subsequently, a 16 group of students was chosen to be interviewed to obtain a global vision of the learning they 17 obtained. The motivation of the students was quite positive, which allowed us to obtain voluntary 18 participation in the field work and gave the students a participative attitude throughout the 19 development of the workshops. Four months later, this positive attitude remained during their 20 direct involvement in various activities, and the students still remembered the fundamental content 21 discussed. Relating the didactic proposal to its immediate environment was shown to increase 22 interest in learning and value in its own context. The results of this educational experience have 23 been very positive, as knowledge was acquired, and interest in the preservation of the environment 24 and the profession of a researcher was promoted. 25

Full text

Article
1
Cultural Sustainability in Ethnobotanical Research
2
with Students up to K-12
3
Lorena Gutiérrez-García1, José Blanco-Salas1*, Jesús Sánchez-Martín2 and Trinidad Ruiz-Téllez1
4
1 Department of Plant Biology, Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Extremadura, 06006 Badajoz, Spain;
5
lorenagg@unex.es (L.G.-G.) blanco_salas@unex.es (J.B.-S.); truiz@unex.es (T.R.-T.).
6
2 Department of Science and Mathematics Education, Faculty of Education, University of Extremadura, 06006
7
Badajoz, Spain; jsanmar@unex.es (J.S.-M.)
8
* Correspondence: blanco_salas@unex.es; Tel.: +34-924-289-300
9
Abstract: In the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), education plays a
10
fundamental role. However, traditional methodologies do not favor the enrichment and personal
11
development essential to promote global awareness. The use of active methodologies based on
12
experiences improve the quality of learning. This work describes the design, implementation, and
13
evaluation of the acquired knowledge of a didactic proposal for non-formal education as a support
14
for regulated education based on botany content. Firstly, a workshop was held, where young people
15
participated directly in developing field work with a real scientific methodology. Subsequently, a
16
group of students was chosen to be interviewed to obtain a global vision of the learning they
17
obtained. The motivation of the students was quite positive, which allowed us to obtain voluntary
18
participation in the field work and gave the students a participative attitude throughout the
19
development of the workshops. Four months later, this positive attitude remained during their
20
direct involvement in various activities, and the students still remembered the fundamental content
21
discussed. Relating the didactic proposal to its immediate environment was shown to increase
22
interest in learning and value in its own context. The results of this educational experience have
23
been very positive, as knowledge was acquired, and interest in the preservation of the environment
24
and the profession of a researcher was promoted.
25
Keywords: active methodologies; Sustainable Development Goals; non-formal education;
26
Ethnobotany; learning assessment; STEM
27
28
1. Introduction
29
Today, society demands new educational methodologies that encourage the active participation
30
of the student, unlike traditional methods where the teacher is the protagonist [1]. Another modern
31
issue is sustainability. This concept is an indisputable need that must be integrated into multiple
32
fields, including teaching [2].
33
Since 1992, UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization) has
34
recognized and promoted education as a basic right for the promotion of sustainable development,
35
but it is in the new World Agenda for Sustainable Development 2030 that this vision is made evident.
36
In this document, education appears both as a specific goal and as a means to achieve all the
37
Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) [3].
38
Education is the basis for promoting development, but it is also essential for personal enrichment,
39
endowing individuals with skills and values and enabling them to be more versatile, critical, and
40
resolute. In other words, developmental education facilitates an understanding between
41
globalization and development by helping promote awareness of "global citizenship" [4]. The success
42
Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 21 June 2020 doi:10.20944/preprints202006.0268.v1
© 2020 by the author(s). Distributed under a Creative Commons CC BY license.

2 of 18
of education would entail improvements in employment and reduce depopulation—problems that
43
mainly affect rural areas.
44
Here, the terms "education" and "sustainable rural development" intersect. Rural development
45
refers to the need to establish a business fabric to make a territory strong and avoid problems such
46
as population loss, emigration, aging, and poor economic diversity.
47
Initiatives are needed to adapt to the needs and constant changes that occur in society, thereby
48
responding to the aforementioned problems, improving the standard of living of the inhabitants of
49
rural areas, and helping to exploit and develop their sustainable environment [5].
50
The sociocultural context surrounding an individual is, in itself, a didactic technique that directly
51
influences the learning process [6]. Students learn more effectively when using active methods and
52
content similar to their daily lives and interests. Therefore, including traditional knowledge as an
53
object of learning [7] can contribute to the perceived value of one’s "own culture", which in turn is
54
important for sustainable development, allowing people to harness their wealth to build their future,
55
transforming it into processes of solidarity and popular economy [8].
56
Although many previous experiences already show the positive impact of non-formal education
57
[9,10], there are few references that focus on an inclusive way to promote so-called integral
58
sustainability [11]—that is, an integrative vision of sustainability beyond environmental and
59
ecological aspects. Thus, the current work presents a didactic experience that is primarily related to
60
three of the SDGs and some of their goals: 4. Ensuring inclusive, equitable, and quality education and
61
promoting lifelong learning opportunities for all (Quality Education), in the sense that it is necessary
62
to ensure that all students acquire the knowledge required to achieve sustainable development; 12.
63
Ensure sustainable consumption and production modalities (responsible production and
64
consumption) due to the need for the efficient use of natural resources and waste reduction in order
65
to achieve a more harmonious existence alongside the environment; 15. Sustainably manage forests,
66
combat desertification, stop and reverse land degradation, and halt biodiversity loss (life of terrestrial
67
ecosystems) to conserve our forests and biodiversity [12].
68
The scientific education of the population is essential for the transition to sustainability. Only in
69
this way can we gain an understanding of the seriousness of the problems facing our planet and our
70
way of life and train future scientists capable of developing more efficient resources and citizens
71
committed to achieving a sustainable society [13].
72
However, to accomplish this goal, changes must be made in the traditional education system,
73
moving from the present transmissionist tendency towards a more constructivist teaching pedagogy
74
[14]. Teaching methodologies with the teacher at the center are still used in many disciplines,
75
especially science. However, there is already evidence that the use of experience-based
76
methodologies improves the quality of learning [15]. These principles are the base of new science
77
education approaches, such as the systematic integration of different science-related subjects in an
78
entire knowledge construct as STEM or even including arts in STEAM.
79
Although human beings are born with the instinct to observe, discover, and create, as we become
80
adult, that desire to investigate becomes disconnected. Many young people have the preconceived
81
idea that science is boring, difficult, and does not ensure a well-paid job in the future [16]. Among
82
the main causes for a negative assessment of science is the organization of the educational system
83
itself, as well as the poor relationship between the subject of study and daily lives of students [17,18].
84
As early as the 1980s, the need to develop the “scientific and technological literacy" of society
85
was promoted to ensure that all citizens are able to make decisions on social issues in a democratic
86
and responsible way [19]. Although actions have been taken since then, there is still a disconnect
87
between what is planned and what is taught in the classroom. There is also a tendency to continue
88
Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 21 June 2020 doi:10.20944/preprints202006.0268.v1

3 of 18
using traditional teaching methods [20]. An academic transformation at different educational levels
89
is still needed, requiring new, more active and realistic teaching programs and methodologies.
90
Disinterest in science also affects the field of botany, showing a downward trend in botanical
91
vocations in the university. However, vegetables are an available and attractive teaching resource to
92
promote a positive view of the sciences. This task is in the hands of educators. For students to develop
93
an interest in science, the teacher must play a key role from an early age. To carry out this task,
94
training in science is essential [21]. Sometimes the scientific training received by teachers is limited,
95
which represents an obstacle in the teaching of the natural sciences [22]. Direct collaboration between
96
teachers and researchers is essential for the teacher's own training, as well as for the development of
97
an integrated scientific curriculum [23].
98
The current article is focused in analyzing an educative experience that will be described below, with
99
the following objective: To analyse the impact of a non-formal education activity on knowledge
100
acquisition according to the framework for teaching Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
101
according to an integral sustainability vision framework, as proposed by Zamora-Polo and Sánchez-
102
Martín [11].
103
This general objective can be split into several research questions:
104
Question 1: Does a non-formal activity inserted into a standard academic space (a high school)
105
have a positive impact on the knowledge acquisition of botanical and ethnobotanical concepts?
106
Question 2: Can a non-formal activity, if designed according to an integral sustainability vision
107
framework, develop positive attitudes towards traditional knowledge preservation?
108
Question 3: Can a non-formal activity, if designed with close collaboration between secondary
109
teachers and university researchers, promote the core concepts of the nature of science, such as what
110
science is for and what kind of person a scientist is?
111
This research is structured in two phases. The first is the design and implementation of a didactic
112
proposal that aimed to raise awareness among young people about the importance of preserving
113
their ethnobotanical heritage and valuing it as a resource for sustainable development by involving
114
the students in a realistic scientific study. The second phase examines, through interviews, the impact
115
of this proposal on the achievement of the goals after a period of 4 months.
116
2. Materials and Methods
117
2.1. Relevance of the location
118
This work is part of a larger piece of research focused on the town of Hornachos, located in the
119
autonomous community of Extremadura (Spain), adjacent to the protected area "Sierra Grande de
120
Hornachos" included in the Natura 2000 Network [24].
121
The environmental richness of this area is important [24] but is not the only reason we chose the
122
area for this work. This environment brings together several features that make it especially
123
interesting. On the one hand, it has great cultural richness resulting from its historical past featuring
124
various cultures, such as Roman, Jewish, Arab, and Moorish. On the other hand, it has a great
125
diversity of plants associated with traditional knowledge and uses [25].
126
However, this rich heritage is being lost due to the increase in intensive agriculture and
127
globalization, leading to the abandonment of natural resources [26,27].
128
Many authors have already noted the importance of education as part of a developmental
129
process to promote integral sustainability [28]. It is a challenge to include the conservation of rural
130
areas and their ethnobotanical identities (understood as cultural and social heritage) in an educative
131
proposal. This process requires the development of skills and experiences that enable the construction
132
of learning based on an assessment [29].
133
Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 21 June 2020 doi:10.20944/preprints202006.0268.v1

4 of 18
134
2.2. The educative center: Institute of Secondary Education (I.E.S) “Los Moriscos”
135
The I.E.S. Los Moriscos is located in the village of Hornachos, in the province of Badajoz
136
(Extremadura) (Figure 1). This area was selected for its particular features, as Hornachos sits on the
137
boundaries of the protected area of "Sierra Grande de Hornachos", which has several protection
138
catalogs both regionally (Regional Zone of Interest (RZI)) and internationally (the Site of Community
139
Importance (SIC), Special Protection Area for Birds (SPA), and Special Area of Conservation (SAC)),
140
which are included in the Biodiversity Conservation Network of the European Union [30]. This area
141
stands out for its cultivated varieties of wild plants with a rich historical–cultural legacy [31].
142
143
Figure 1. Location of the town of Hornachos in Extremadura, Spain.
144
145
It should be noted that the school in this area is a publicly owned rural secondary education
146
institute created in 1997 and attended by students from various localities adjoining the protected area
147
of "Sierra Grande de Hornachos", but the largest percentage is composed of young people from the
148
town of Hornachos.
149
According to the corresponding data for the academic year of 2018–2019, the period of the
150
first part of this study corresponding to the teaching workshops, the Center consisted of 368 students
151
distributed at the Secondary Education levels, including those in a baccalaureate in the modalities of
152
sciences, technology and humanities, and social sciences and those in the formative cycle of the
153
middle degree, "Attention to people in situations of dependence". In addition, the Centre had a staff
154
of 48 teachers and 9 members of non-teaching staff working as computer scientists, administrators,
155
concierges, social educators, etc.
156
This Center has a "low" socioeconomic level [32], and most of the students’ families live off
157
agriculture, livestock, or construction. In addition, the immigrant rate is low, and no significant
158
differences were found in either socioeconomic conditions or cultural and religious ones.
159
160
2.3. Participating students
161
Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 21 June 2020 doi:10.20944/preprints202006.0268.v1

5 of 18
The entire design of the educative intervention was done on the basis of a tight collaboration
162
with the teachers. Based on a prior agreement with the Center's teaching and management team, K-
163
9 students were distributed into 4 groups, totaling 72 young people between the ages of 13 and 16.
164
This level was chosen because of its near-adult cognitive development and proximity to the
165
end of compulsory studies, as determined by the Spanish administrations [33]. Since it did not
166
inconvenience the workshop objectives, the representation of students from locations other than
167
Hornachos was not taken into account because of their small representation and because this study
168
was not interested in excluding certain students but in arousing interest in research, the value of one’s
169
own resources, and the promotion of sustainable development awareness in young people.
170
Following the ethics of data protection, identification of the interview participants is done
171
using fictional names. In addition, all participants gave consent to be recorded and have their answers
172
used as part of this academic research.
173
174
2.4. The educational proposal
175
A pedagogical proposal was made consisting of a workshop based on the scientific method and
176
research applied to Ethnobotany called "Learning to research in our protected space—Sierra Grande
177
de Hornachos". This proposal was part of the program "The Week of Science and Technology in
178
Extremadura", an oriented program focused on K-8 to K-12 students from public or private centers,
179
which has been held annually since 2017 and whose main objective is to promote scientific culture
180
and its dissemination.
181
The didactic proposal was divided into 3 milestones, carried out over 3 days and lasting 2 hours
182
each, within school hours. The participation of the Center’s director and faculty of teachers was
183
necessary. Every day the workshop was attended by all the selected students accompanied by a
184
group of teachers (ranging from 3 to 4 teachers) who depend on shift work or whose schedules were
185
dedicated to the workshop.
186
The content focused on the significant interculturality that persists in knowledge linked to wild
187
and cultivated plant species of enormous value [25].
188
The activities carried out are detailed below and summarized in Figure 2.
189
190
Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 21 June 2020 doi:10.20944/preprints202006.0268.v1

6 of 18
191
Figure 2. Graphic summary of the study process.
192
193
Milestone 1. (first session) Introductory talk on the work carried out by scientific staff, the
194
importance of the promotion of science, and the scientific method, an exhibition of workshop
195
objectives and programming, an explanation of fieldwork or practical workshops, and the
196
delivery of data collection sheets and guidelines to follow.
197
Milestone 2. (second session) Collection of tokens and samples by students and resolving any
198
doubts; practical activity: preparation of herbarium sheets with vegetable samples of Arbutus
199
unedo L., a typical plant in the study area.
200
Milestone 3 (third session) Sharing and discussion of the results obtained from the collection
201
of data carried out by students, highlighting the most significant plant species, and
202
discussion and conclusions of the sessions.
203
204
Below is the field activity or hands-on workshops conducted by students outside the classroom.
205
These tasks consisted of each student choosing one or two adults over the age of 70 to be treated as
206
an ethnobotanical informant. The selected persons could be family, but they had to be linked to rural
207
life and should, therefore, know the traditional uses associated with wild or cultivated plant species.
208
Students had to ask about the traditional uses that local wild or cultivated plants might have in this
209
particular area.
210
A model table was used for data collection. Each student was given two tabs (Figures 3, 4) that
211
served as a script and included informed consent informing them about the research and the purpose
212
of the collection of the data, which all the interviewed adults signed. Each of these tables was
213
identified with a different tab code, making it easy to identify later.
214
Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 21 June 2020 doi:10.20944/preprints202006.0268.v1

7 of 18
215
216
Figure 3. Data collection sheet provided to students (front).
217
218
Figure 4. Data collection sheet provided to students (back).
219
220
For the design of the data collection sheet, 10 subcategories of use were considered based on
221
those described in the Spanish Inventory of Traditional Knowledge Relating to Biodiversity [34]. Each
222
of these subcategories was quoted verbally during the workshops for each of the plants, while the
223
interviewer (student) wrote the information given by the informants. These subcategories relate to
224
the types of uses that a plant can have for humans. Each of them is detailed below:
225
1. Human food; 2. Animal feed; 3. Medicine for humans; 4. Animal medicine; 5. Toxic or
226
poisonous; 6. Fuel; 7. Used to make tools and other utensils; 8. Used for traditional parties or events;
227
9. Used as a building element; 10. Other uses.
228
Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 21 June 2020 doi:10.20944/preprints202006.0268.v1

8 of 18
The time spent on each interview was variable and depended on the work done by each student.
229
The tokens, samples, and photographs provided were collected by the researchers during the second
230
day of the workshop, and the data were digitized at the Botany Laboratory of the University of
231
Extremadura to be exhibited and, in the last session, debated in the classroom.
232
233
2.5. Data analysis
234
Both quantitative and qualitative mixed methodologies were considered [35]. In the analysis of
235
the development of the workshop as well as the practical workshops carried out by the students, the
236
quantitative logic was applied, while in the second part of this research, open interviews were
237
conducted with a small group of student participants in the workshop whose results were
238
qualitatively analysed to assess the educational impact of the proposed activity. In this last case, the
239
individuals were selected according to what the teachers suggested when they were asked for
240
students that could comply the following conditions: a) They attended the activity; b) they were not
241
especially brilliant students or had a clear and evident motivation towards the sciences; and c) they
242
came from the village and had the opportunity to connect with their own relatives in ethnobotanical
243
research.
244
For the second part of this work, direct unstructured interviews were used to avoid limiting the
245
interviewee's responses [36].
246
Six students, 3 boys and 3 girls, were selected. All students had participated in the face-to-face
247
workshop and also showed interest and involvement in the practical workshops, delivering truthful
248
information on two plant species collected in the tokens provided to them along with a sample and /
249
or a photograph of those plants as a sample.
250
The interviews were conducted individually in the month of March 2020 during school hours
251
during the time dedicated to recess. This period was four months after the activity itself took place,
252
so the responses and the whole conversation can be considered a memory of the practical workshop.
253
To facilitate comfort and conversation, 6 open-type issues were designed for obtaining
254
information on the impact of the conferences held in the first phase and determining their educational
255
impact. These issue were the initial starting point for a fruitful conversation that was recorded and
256
analyzed. Three fields of study or variables were thus established: 1. Learning about science, 2.
257
Learning about botany, and 3. Emotional performance. Thus, the number of issues for each variable
258
is 3. Over the course of the interviews, the interviewer used the pre-designed questions as a guide
259
and was able to pose them in a different order or ask other secondary questions (but always keeping
260
in mind the objectives).
261
The data were collected by using audio recordings and field notebook annotations. Two different
262
experts analyzed each recording to identify the particular expressions for each variable. Afterwards,
263
a third expert contrasted both codifications and made them reach a consensus for qualified data
264
codification.
265
3. Results and Discussion
266
3.1. Quantitative data analysis: the workshop
267
Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 21 June 2020 doi:10.20944/preprints202006.0268.v1

9 of 18
268
Curiosity and motivation are essential for learning. This is determined not only by the teacher's
269
performance or the subject matter but also by the teaching methodologies employed [37].
270
Traditionally, methodologies have been promoted where the teacher is the protagonist and the
271
student is a simple recipient; however, more active methodologies involve the participation and
272
direct intervention of the student in concrete or everyday experiences, which allows greater
273
activation of knowledge [38,39].
274
During the development of the present workshop, the direct involvement of the students in the
275
practical activities was varied. On the first and third days, where the methodology used involved
276
speaking or discourse, the performance of the students was more passive, showing an increase in
277
interest when the analysis and discussion of the results obtained from the fieldwork was carried out,
278
suggesting that this work was a topic of interest to the students; in the second part, all the students
279
became involved, although this was not an optional decision.
280
Moreover, in the workshop that took place outside the classroom, motivation was an important
281
factor. Several authors argue that the choice of the subject of study is essential to achieve greater
282
learning [40]. Further, not all students attending the workshop participated in the practical
283
workshops held outside the classroom because such workshops were not mandatory. More than 29%
284
(nearly a third) of students conducted interviews with their elders and collected the information in
285
the pieces previously provided to them. Thus, a total of 21 students collected a total of 40 tokens.
286
Therefore, almost all students collected information from two plants. Specifically, 19 of them collected
287
information from 2 plant species, among which 4 also delivered plant photographs and samples, and
288
2 contributed a sheet with 1 species per person, one of which was accompanied by a photograph and
289
vegetable sample.
290
Information was collected from 23 different plants—9 cultivated (Aloe vera (L.) Burm. F., Citrus
291
x sinensis (L.) Osbeck, Ficus carica L., Gossypium sp., Olea europaea subsp europaea var. sylvestris (Mill.)
292
Lehr., Punica granatum L., Rosmarinus officinalis L., Solanum lycopersicum L., and Ziziphus jujuba Mill.)
293
and 14 wild plants (Arbutus unedo L., Cistus ladanifer L. Crataegus monogyna Jacq., Cyperus sp., Daphne
294
gnidium L.,Erica sp., Eucalyptus camaldulensis Dehnh., Heliotropium europaeum L., Hypericum perforatum
295
L., Quercus rotundifolia Lam., Retama sphaerocarpa (L.) Boiss., Rumex pulcher L., Thymus sp., and Urtica
296
urens L.), some of which appeared more frequently than others (Figure 5). Among the most
297
represented were Arbutus unedo and Thymus sp., indicating that these species are of great interest to
298
the ethnobotanical identity of Sierra Grande.
299
300
301
Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 21 June 2020 doi:10.20944/preprints202006.0268.v1

10 of 18
302
Figure 5. Frequency with which each species appeared in the collected tokens.
303
304
A total of 80 uses were obtained, the majority of which were: 2. Animal feed, 3. Medicine
305
for humans, and 1. Human food (Figure 6). The maximum number of uses obtained for the same
306
species was 8, and this figure was only achieved for Arbutus unedo, followed by Thymus sp. with
307
7 and Crataegus monogyna with 6. From the set of extracted information, we also observed that
308
the most commonly used parts of the plant were the Leaves (L) and Stems (St), which were
309
consumed from more than 13 of the 23 total plants. Least used were the Seeds (S), which were
310
only used for three species (Ficus carica, Retama sphaerocarpa, and Urtica urens). Flowers (F) and
311
Fruits (Fr) were also used for more than 40% of species (Appendix A1).
312
313
Figure 6. Total uses obtained by subcategory.
314
315
The Autonomous Community of Extremadura is one of the Spanish regions with the fewest
316
ethnobotanical studies [41]. Most studies focus on medicinal and veterinary plants [42,43,52,44–51].
317
However, few enclaves in the region have had in-depth studies on the traditional knowledge that
318
communities possess about their plants. Two exceptions are the Monfragüe National Park, in the
319
province of Cáceres [53], and Calabria and Siberia in Badajoz province [54]. For the Regional Zone of
320
Interest (RZI), Sierra Grande de Hornachos, only one recent study has been done on edible plants
321
[55]. Therefore, the results obtained by the students, which may seem modest, have high scientific
322
2.5
12.5
7.5
2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5
5
2.5
7.5
2.5
5 5
2.5
7.5
2.5 2.5
12.5
2.5 2.5
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Aloe vera
Arbutus unedo
Cistus ladanifer
Citrus x sinensis
Crataegus monogyna
Cyperus sp.
Daphne gnidium
Hierba de los…
Erica sp.
Eucalyptus…
Ficus carica
Gossypium sp.
Hypericum…
Olea europaea…
Punica granatum
Quercus rotundifolia
Retama sphaerocarpa
Rosmarinus officinalis
Rumex pulcher
Solanum lycopersicum
Thymus sp.
Urtica urens
Ziziphus jujuba
12
15
14
4
3
7
6
6
4
9
1. Human food
2. Animal feed
3. Medicine for humans
4. Animal medicine
5. Is toxic or poisonous
6. As fuel
7. It is used to make tools and other utensils
8. Used at traditional parties or events
9. As a building element
10. Other Uses
Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 21 June 2020 doi:10.20944/preprints202006.0268.v1

11 of 18
interest since most of the uses collected are novel for the area and, in some cases, are novel for the
323
region.
324
The results reveal that the students who participated did so with total involvement. In general,
325
the group proved to be curious and interested in the plants and cultural richness of their environment,
326
which is a very interesting source of knowledge.
327
328
3.2. Qualitative data analysis: the interviews
329
330
Analysis of the six interviews offered interesting insights into the three study fields: nature of
331
science, learning methods, and affective domain and emotional performance. Since a qualitative
332
methodology was used, the most relevant results were obtained by examining samples from the
333
recorded interviews. The entire text for these interviews is available upon request. The following
334
section offers samples from the interviews.
335
336
3.2.1. About Nature of Science (NOS)
337
These interviews included several specific questions on how the students understand some of
338
the core concepts of the nature of science, such as: What do you think science is? What is Science for?
339
What do you know about the Scientific Method? and What is a scientist for you? Students had
340
difficulties defining these concepts, which agrees with previous studies [56], but some
341
understandings were clear:
342
343
“Science is important for society” (Individual 1)
344
“Science is knowledge, and there are many kinds of scientists” (Individual 3)
345
“Science explains reality” (Individual 3)
346
347
These students presented epistemologic statements about the focus of science and how it influences
348
their lives. Furthermore, when asked about scientists and the scientific method, they said:
349
350
“Science method is a pathway, a procedure for researching.” (Individual 2)
351
“A scientist has to have interest in details and be rigorous, careful… Science cannot be made
352
with fuzzy borders.” (Individual 3)
353
“A scientist cannot be subjective, but objective.” (Individual 4)
354
355
The interviewees easily identified some of the most relevant values of science in itself [57], such as
356
objectivity, reliability, methods, and systematicity.
357
358
3.2.2. About the botanical learning method
359
An important insight of the current work is to determine how important the method is that we use
360
to teach science, particularly botanical science. In this sense, the students again expressed ideas that
361
were different from traditional ways of learning:
362
363
“I like plants. What I liked the most was the practical activity with the strawberry tree.”
364
(Individual 2)
365
“(making things directly by hand) is a very motivating way of learning. I felt ready to make new
366
things and to learn. “ (Individual 3)
367
Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 21 June 2020 doi:10.20944/preprints202006.0268.v1

12 of 18
“Question: Is it easier to learn in this way? Answer: Yes, yes, much better. This is better than
368
writing all the time.” (Individual 5)
369
“The most boring part was the initial oral exposition.” (Individual 6)
370
371
3.3.3. About sustainability as an integral concept involving ethnobotanical ideas
372
373
Cultural sustainability is not a very frequently taught subject when discussing sustainability
374
concepts. Indeed, the relevance of cultural sustainability was only recently framed [11]; presently, it
375
is not possible to talk about sustainability without mentioning cultural sustainability. In this sense,
376
the interviews exhibited the acquisition of several interesting ideas:
377
378
“Question: Do you think it is important to preserve these uses for these plants (traditional
379
medicine usages)? Answer: Yes, so in the future we will be able to know how the past was.”
380
(Individual 1)
381
“I have learned some new information about plants and how to keep in contact with nature.”
382
(Individual 4)
383
“I have learned general culture about the plants that are around us in our town. We should be
384
proud of living in such a beautiful place, with a lot of plants with interesting usages. This is part of
385
our town and its history.” (Individual 5)
386
387
3.3.4. Feelings, self-regulation, and emotional performance of the learning process
388
389
Lastly, the core dimensions of education, such as self-regulation of the learning process, and several
390
emotional aspects emergedduring the interviews, as can be seen in the following statements:
391
392
“The practical workshop helped me learn more vegetal species. I already knew some of them,
393
but now I can identify more.” (Individual 1)
394
“I felt happy; nothing made me feel bored.” (Individual 2)
395
“I would recommend using these kinds of activities again during the course.” (Individual 6)
396
397
Qualitative analysis of the interviews revealed effectiveness in the acquisition of many types of
398
knowledge, not only knowledge related to botanical learning but also the understanding of
399
ethnobotanical issues, the value of cultural sustainability, and even an understanding of various
400
aspects related to the nature of science. In addition, since these interviews were carried out several
401
months after the activity, they revealed a significant recall of related knowledge.
402
403
4. Conclusions
404
Considering the results obtained, we conclude that the use of training techniques and tools based
405
on active methodologies provides an interesting resource to generate knowledge in symbiosis with
406
traditional classroom teaching (i.e., for ethnobotany in the "Sierra Grande" protected area of
407
Hornachos).
408
This work has shown that a non-formal activity inserted into a standard academic space (a high
409
school) has a positive impact on the acquisition of botanical and ethnobotanical knowledge.
410
Moreover, if designed according to an integral sustainability vision framework, student can develop
411
positive attitudes towards traditional knowledge preservation. Further, if designed with close
412
Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 21 June 2020 doi:10.20944/preprints202006.0268.v1

13 of 18
collaboration between secondary teachers and university researchers, this type of activity can
413
promote the core concepts of the Nature of Science, such as what science is for, and what kind of
414
person a scientist is.
415
Author Contributions: Conceptualization and methodology, J.,S.-M; software, L.,G-G; validation, J.,B.-S; formal
416
analysis L.G-G.; investigation, J.,B.-S and L.G-G; resources, T.,R.-T.; data curation, L.G.-G.; writing—original
417
draft preparation, L.G.-G. and T.,R.-T.; writing—review and editing, J., B-S.; visualization, L., G-G.; supervision,
418
J., S.-M; project administration, J., B.-S.; funding acquisition, T., R.-T. All authors have read and agreed to the
419
published version of the manuscript.
420
421
Funding: This research was funded by the Junta de Extremadura (Spain) and the European Regional
422
Development Fund through grant number IB16003.
423
Acknowledgments: The authors would like to extend their sincere thanks to the town of Hornachos and the
424
collaboration of the I.E.S. “Los Moriscos” for their cooperation during the fieldwork.
425
426
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
427
Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 21 June 2020 doi:10.20944/preprints202006.0268.v1

Appendix A
428
Appendix A1. Data obtained by students in the workshops.
429
Scientific name
Vernacular name
Nº chips on it appears
Origin (Silvestre=S, Cultivated=C)
Parts used
1.Human food
2.Animal feed
3.Medicina para humanos
4.Medicine for humans
5.Is toxic or poisonous
6.As fuel
7.It is used to make tools and other utensils
8.Used at traditional parties or events
9.As a building element
10.Other Uses
Aloe vera
Aloe vera
1
C
L
Arbutus unedo
Madroño, madroñera
5
S
L, St, R, Fr, F
Cistus ladanifer
Jara
3
S
L, St, R, F
Citrus xsinensis
Naranjo
1
C
L, St, Fr
Crataegus monogyna
Tilero
1
S
St, Fr, F
Cyperus sp.
Juncia
1
S
L, St
Daphne gnidium
Torvisca
1
S
St
Heliotropium europaeum
Hierba de los alacranes
1
S
F
Erica sp.
Brezo
1
S
F
Eucalyptus camaldulensis
Eucalipto
1
S
L
Ficus carica
Higuera
2
C
Fr, S, F
Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 21 June 2020 doi:10.20944/preprints202006.0268.v1

2 of 18
Gossypium sp.
Planta de algodón
1
C
Fr
Hypericum perforatum
Á rnica
3
S
L, St, F
Olea europaea subsp. europaea var. sylvestris
Olivo
1
C
L, Fr
Punica granatum
Granado
2
C
L, St, R, Fr
Quercus rotundifolia
Encina
2
S
St, Fr
Retama sphaerocarpa
Retama
1
S
L, St, Fr, S, F
Rosmarinus officinalis
Romero
3
C
L, F
Rumex pulcher
Romaza
1
S
L, St, R
Solanum lycopersicum
Tomatera
1
C
Fr
Thymus sp.
Tomillo
5
S
L, St, R, F
Urtica urens
Ortiga
1
S
L, S
Ziziphus jujuba
Azufaifa
1
C
L, St, Fr
430
431
Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 21 June 2020 doi:10.20944/preprints202006.0268.v1

References
1. Miguel-Dávila, J.A.; López-Berzosa, D.; Martín-Sánchez, M. ¿Una participación activa del alumno
pronostica una buena nota en el examen? (Does the active participation of students serve as a predictor
of good marks achievement?). WPOM - Work. Pap. Oper. Manag. 2012, 3, 71–83.
2. Hernández-Barco, M.; Sánchez-Martín, J.; Blanco-Salas, J.; Ruiz-Téllez, T. Teaching Down to Earth—
Service-Learning Methodology for Science Education and Sustainability at the University Level: A
Practical Approach. Sustainability 2020, 12, 542.
3. Rieckmann M. Educación para los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible: objetivos de aprendizaje - Rieckmann,
Marco - Google Libros; 2017; ISBN 9789233000704.
4. Fondón-Ludeña, Anabell, Gómez-Quintero, Juan David, López-Ramos, Victor María, Neila-Boyer,
Isabel, Remacha-Fernández, María, Robayo-Zambrano, D. La pertinencia de la educación para el desarrollo
y la ciudadanía global en el segundo ciclo de educación infantil en Aragón y Extremadura.; 1a.; Asamblea de
Cooperación por la Paz, 2014;
5. Á lvarez Cáceres, B. Juventud y emprendimiento en el mundo rural., Universidad de Valladolid, 2014.
6. Rosas Arellano, J. La importancia del contexto en el diseño de política social. Rev. Perspect. Políticas
Públicas 2016, 13.
7. Martínez Naharro, S.; Bonet Espinosa, P.; Cáceres González, P.; Fargueta Cerdá, F.; García Felix, E. Los
objetos de aprendizaje como recurso de calidad para la docencia: Criterios de validación de objetos en
la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia. CEUR Workshop Proc. 2007, 318, 1–12.
8. Bonfil, G. El etnodesarrollo: sus premisas jurídicas, políticas y de organización.; Docip: Etnocidio y
etnodesarrollo: San José de Costa Rica, 1981;
9. Borreguero, G.M.; Correa, F.L.N.; Núñez, M.M.; Martín, J.S. Recreational experiences for teaching basic
scientific concepts in primary education: The case of density and pressure. Eurasia J. Math. Sci. Technol.
Educ. 2018, 14.
10. Francl, M. Homemade chemists. Nat. Chem. 2012, 4, 687–688.
11. Zamora-Polo, F.; Sánchez-Martín, J. Teaching for a better world. Sustainability and Sustainable
Development Goals in the construction of a change-maker university. Sustain. 2019, 11.
12. Naciones Unidas Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible Available online:
https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/es/objetivos-de-desarrollo-sostenible/ (accessed on Mar 2,
2020).
13. Vilches, A. Contribución de la educación científica a la apropiación de los objetivos de desarrollo
sostenible. Enseñanza las ciencias Rev. Investig. y Exp. didácticas 2013, 0, 3717–3721.
14. Á lvarez Salgado, E.; Arias Guevara, H. El Aprendizaje De Algunos Conceptos Fundamentales En El
Campo De La Botánica. Una Experiencia Investigación Aula. TED Tecné, Episteme y Didaxis 2017, 4.
15. Hanh, N.T.K. Applying Some Modern Methods and Techniques in Teaching Chemistry to Develop
Students ’ Competence in Vietnam. World J. Chem. Educ. 2018, 6, 184–189.
16. Rodríguez, J.M.M.; Serrano, M.J.H.; González, S.S.; Rodríguez, J.M.M.; Serrano, M.J.H.; González, S.S. El
interés por el conocimiento científico de los estudiantes de Secundaria en España. Educ. Soc. 2019, 40.
17. Solbes, J.; Montserrat, R.; Furió Más, C. Desinterés del alumnado hacia el aprendizaje de la ciencia:
implicaciones en su enseñanza. Didáctica las ciencias Exp. y Soc. 2007, 117, 91–117.
18. Solbes, J.; Vilches, A. Investigación didáctica: papel de las relaciones entre ciencia, tecnología, sociedad
y ambiente en la formación ciudadana. Enseñanza las ciencias 2004, 22, 337–348.
Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 21 June 2020 doi:10.20944/preprints202006.0268.v1

2 of 18
19. Acevedo Díaz, J. Ciencia, Tecnología y Sociedad (CTS): un enfoque innovador para la enseñanza de las
ciencias. Rev. Educ. la Univ. Granada 1997, 269–275.
20. Martín-Gordillo, M., Tedesco, J. C., López-Cerezo, J. A., Acevedo-Díaz, J. A., Echevarría, J., Osorio, C.
Educación, ciencia, tecnología y sociedad; OEI, C. de A.E.U. de la, Ed.; 1a.; Madrid, Spain, 2000; ISBN
9788476662151.
21. García-Berlanga, O. Las plantas como recursos didáctico. La Botánica en la enseñanza de las Ciencias.
Flora Montiberica 2019, 73, 93–99.
22. Chakour, R.; Alami, A.; Selmaoui, S.; Eddif, A.; Zaki, M.; Boughanmi, Y. Earth Sciences Teaching
Difficulties in Secondary School: A Teacher’s Point of View. Educ. Sci. 2019, 9, 243.
23. Riquarts, K.; Hansen, K.-H.H.; Una, P.; Del, D. Collaboration among teachers, researchers and in-service
trainers to develop an integrated science curriculum. J. Curric. Stud. 1998, 30, 661–676.
24. Natura 2000 Standard Dataform. Sierra Grande de Hornachos. Available online:
http://natura2000.eea.europa.eu/Natura2000/SDF.aspx?site=ES0000072 (accessed on Feb 20, 2020).
25. Blanco-Salas, J.; Gutiérrez-García, L.; Labrador-Moreno, J.; Ruiz-Téllez, T. Wild Plants Potentially Used
in Human Food in the Protected Area "Sierra Grande de Hornachos" of Extremadura (Spain).
Sustainability 2019, 11, 456.
26. Carvalho, A. M. & Barata, A.M. The consumption of wild edible plants. In Wild plants, mushrooms and
nuts.; 2016; pp. 169–198.
27. Jug-Dujakovi´c, M.; Łukasz, Ł. The contribution of Josip Baki´c’ s research to the study of wild edible
plants of the adriatic coast: a military project with ethnobiological and anthropological implications.
Slovak Ethnol. 2016, 2, 158–168.
28. Lozano, R.; Lukman, R.; Lozano, F.J.; Huisingh, D.; Lambrechts, W. Declarations for sustainability in
higher education: Becoming better leaders, through addressing the university system. J. Clean. Prod. 2013,
48, 10–19.
29. Bastidas Mora, J.R.; Florez Onofre, M.A. Evaluación en el aprendizaje de las Ciencias Naturales en los
estudiantes de Grado Quinto, de la Institución Educativa Municipal Ciudad de Pasto, Sede Lorenzo de
Aldana, Universidad de Nariño: San Juan de Pasto, Colombia, 2014.
30. Junta de Extremadura Á reas protegidas de Extremadura. Available online:
http://extremambiente.juntaex.es/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1285&Itemid=459
(accessed on Feb 21, 2020).
31. Contreras, J. ¿Seguimos siendo lo que comemos? In; 2013; p. 214 ISBN 9786077607779.
32. Instituto de Estadística de Extremadura Mapas Municipales. In Atlas Socioeconómico de Extremadura; IEEX,
Ed.; Mérida, 2019; p. 12.
33. Ley Orgánica 8/2013, de 9 de diembre, para la mejora de la calidad educativa.; Spain, 2013; p. 64;.
34. MAPA Inventario Español de los Conocimientos Tradicionales relativos a la Biodiversidad.; MAPA, Ed.; 1a.;
Madrid, 2019;
35. Creswell, J. Research Design Cressweell 2014; SAGE, Ed.; 4a.; 2014;
36. Vargas Jiménez, I. La entrevista en la investigación cualitativa: nuevas tendencias y retos. Rev. Calid. en
la Educ. Super. 2012, 3, 119–139.
37. Junco Herrera, I. La motivación en el proceso ensenanza-aprendizaje. Temas para la Educ. 2010, 9, 1–14.
38. Canós, Lourdes, Mauri, J. Metodologías activas para la docencia y aplicación de las nuevas tecnologías:
una experiencia. 2005.
39. Abellán Toledo, Y.; Herrada Valverde, R.I. Innovación educativa y metodologías activas en Educación
Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 21 June 2020 doi:10.20944/preprints202006.0268.v1

3 of 18
Secundaria: la perspectiva de los docentes de lenguas castellana y literatura. Rev. Fuentes 2016, 18, 65–
76.
40. Albrecht, J.R.; Karabenick, S.A. Relevance for Learning and Motivation in Education. J. Exp. Educ. 2018,
86, 1–10.
41. Blanco-Salas, J., Ruiz-Téllez, T. Propuesta innovadora de valorización de la biodiversidad vegetal del
espacio protegido “ZIR Sierra Grande de Hornachos.” In Proceedings of the 7o Congreso Forestal
Español. Sociedad Española de Ciencias Forestales; Plasencia, Cáceres, España, 2017.
42. Guío, Y. Naturaleza y salud en Extremadura: los remedios.; Extremadura, A. de, Ed.; 1a.; Mérida, 1992;
43. Vázquez, F.M.; Suarez, M.A.; Pérez, A. Medicinal plants used in the Barros Area, Badajoz Province
(Spain). J. Ethnopharmacol. 1997, 55, 81–85.
44. Gregori, P. La medicina popular en Extremadura: Análisis bibliográfico, Universidad de Extremadura,
2000.
45. Penco, A.D. Medicina popular veterinaria en la comarca de Zafra, Universidad de Extremadura, 2005.
46. Muriel, M.R. Estudio técnico de los recursos no maderables de la comarca de Las Hurdes: Las Plantas
Medicinales, Universidad de Valladolid, 2006.
47. Gregori-Cruz, M.P. Medicina popular en Valencia del Mombuey, Universidad de Extremadura, 2007.
48. Vallejo, J.R. La etnomedicina en Guadiana del Caudillo (Badajoz), Universidad de Extremadura, 2008.
49. Vallejo, J.R.; Peral, D.; Gemio, P.; Carrasco, M.C.; Heinrich, M.; Pardo-de-Santayana, M. Atractylis
gummifera and Centaurea ornata in the Province of Badajoz (Extremadura, Spain)-
Ethnopharmacological importance and toxicological risk. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2009, 126, 366–370.
50. Peral Pacheco, D.; Martín Alvarado, M.Á .; Vallejo Villalobos, José Ramón Altimiras Roset, J.; Roura Poch,
P. La medicina popular en la ciudad de Badajoz. Rev. Estud. Extrem. 2009, 65, 1389–1438.
51. Martín-Alvarado, M.A. Medicina popular en la ciudad de Badajoz, Universidad de Extremadura, 2010.
52. Pérez-Ramírez, I. Conocimiento local y uso de las plantas aromáticas y medicinales en tres localidades
del sur de Extremadura, Universidad de Sevilla, 2013.
53. Tejerina, A. Usos y saberes sobre las plantas de Monfragüe. Etnobotánica de la comarca natural; Itomonfrag.;
Cáceres, 2010;
54. Blanco, E., Cuadrado, C. Etnobotánica en Extremadura. Estudios de la Calabria y la Siberia extremeñas.; Montes,
E.B. y C.A. de los, Ed.; Madrid, Spain, 2000;
55. Gutiérrez-García, L.; Labrador-Moreno, J.; Blanco-Salas, J.; Monago-Lozano, F.J.; Ruiz-Téllez, T. Food
Identities, Biocultural Knowledge and Gender Differences in the Protected Area “Sierra Grande de
Hornachos” (Extremadura, Spain). Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 2283.
56. Abd-Ei-Khalick, F. Embedding nature of science instruction in preservice elementary science courses:
abandoning scientism, but... J. Sci. Teacher Educ. 2001, 12, 215–233.
57. Kolstø, S.D. Scientific literacy for citizenship: Tools for dealing with the science dimension of
controversial socioscientific issues. Sci. Educ. 2001, 85, 291–310.
Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 21 June 2020 doi:10.20944/preprints202006.0268.v1