Content uploaded by Safinah Surya Hakim
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Safinah Surya Hakim on Jun 11, 2020
Content may be subject to copyright.
*Correspoding author: safinah.hakim@gmail.com
The Use of Fungal Endophyte Penicillium citrinum on Tree
Seedling: Applicabilit y and Limitation
Safinah Surya Hakim1* and Tri W . Yu wa t i1
1Banjarbaru Environment and F orest ry Research Development Institute, Banjarbaru, 70721. Indonesia
Abstract. Penici llium citr inum is an endophyte fungus isolated from plant tissues that live in t ropical
peatland. Various st udy reveals that endop hytic fungi give advantages to p lant health. Since 2015,
series of experiments were conducted to investigate the capability of P. citrinum P3.10 as biofertilizer
of plant tree in nursery stage which are: pathogenicity test, in vitro assay, direct application to seeds,
dosage test, and fertilizer formulation. This pap er presents a review from our research of P. citrinum
isolate P3.10 from the isolation stage to the biofertilizer product formulation. Research results showed
that the application of endophytic fungi to seedlings gave p ositive responses. However, during the
research process there were also obstacles in the application of endophytic fungi to plants, which are:
(a) difficult ies in application due t o the varied response, (b) formulation, (c) storage, (d) isol ate
viabil ity, and (d) fungal isolate maintenance. Risk management was needed during biofertilizer
production. Hence, the utilization of biofertilizer made from endophyt e fungi is applicable and can be
used not only on an experimental scale but also on a larger scale.
1 Introduction
Naturally, plants have certain relationships with
endophytes. It is reported that 90% of the plant do
symbiosis with microbes, including endophyte fungi.
Unlike mycorrhiza; which has specialized structures
within its pla nt-fungus interaction such as arbuscules,
Hartig net, vesicles; plant-endophyte interaction is
deficient in specialized structures [1]. Nevertheless ,
plant-endophyte relationship according to many studies
have significant benefits for the plant as follow: (a)
Enhance plant growth [2-6], (b) Source of secondary
metabolites that can be a benefit for plant and
pharmaceutical needs [7-10], and (c) Induce plant
resistance to pest and diseas e [10-12].
Many fungi identified as endophytic fungi,
including Penicillium citrinum. During this research, P.
citrinum s how the ability to improve the growth of the
plant [13]. P. citrinum produced hormone Indole Acetic
Acid (IAA), extracellular enzymes , and au xin which can
increase the growth of the inoculated plants [14].
Besides, endophytic fungi Penicillium sp. was indicated
able to increase plant growth by increasing plant
nutrient absorption [15].
To gain information on the biology and function
of endophytic fungi in peat swamp forest, Banjarbaru
Forestry Research and Development Institute has
conducted a multi-year-research focusing on endophyte
bioprospection. The research main purpose was
bioprospecting microbe in peatland, p artic ula rly
mycorrhizal and endophytic fungi. At the early stage of
the research in 2015, exploration, isolation, and
screening were carried out to identify endophytic fungi
that could potentially increase plant growth. In the
second year (2016), research activities were done to
obtain information on the effectiveness of endophytic
fungi on the plant through inoculation. At the next stage
(2017), the research activ ities aimed to find out the best
inoculation techniques and dosages for microbial
applications in plants. In the last year (201 8), the
formulation was done to investigate the effective carrier
for endophytic fungi-ba s ed b io logical fert i lizer. Th is
paper presents a review and s ummary of the research
re s ult s that illustrate the applicability and limitation
occurs in the development of biofertilizers .
2 Research Process
Several processes were done in this research (Fig. 1).
Exp loration was the first stage of research activity to
isolate endophyte fungi of trees in the peat swamp
forest. Endophytic fungi isolated fro m leaves of the peat
swamp forest tree (Fig. 2). Collected leaves were stored
in the cooler bag and processed in the laboratory.
Leaves cut into small pieces, surface sterilized, and
moved into Malt Extract Agar medium. Diffe rent
morphologies of fungi were tested on a specific
Pikovskhaya (PVK) Agar medium, to test its ability in
phosphate solubilization (Fig. 3). Twelve endophytic
fungi found able to produce clear zones on PVK Agar,
which means it has the potential to help phosphate
absorption in plants. We identified four species of
endophytic fungi which showed the best performance in
PVK A gar, i.e. G1.12 (Pestalopsis sp.), M2.6
(Phyllosticta sp.), K1.4 (Endophytic fungi sp.), An d
P3.10 (P. citrinum).
Fig ure 1. The research p rocess of bioprospection of
microbial peat swamp forest.
BIO Web of Conferences 20, 03005 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/20202003005
ICWEB 2019
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution
License 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Fig ure 1. Phy logenetic tree of isolated endophy tic fungi of
peat-swamp forest in Central Kalimantan.
Fig ure 2. Clear zone in PVK media indicated fungal ability
to solubilize phosphate.
Investigating the ability of isolated endophytic fungi
acted as a plant growth enhancer in vivo became the
ma in aim of the second year research. Liquid fungi
inoculants were inoculated to plant in the greenhouse.
After a 12 week observation, endophytic fungi
inoculation on Gerunggang (Cratoxylon glaucum)
seedlings significantly affected the height but not the
plant diameter gro wth and leaf numbers. To achieve a
better understanding of plant responses to endophyte
fungi, inoculation tests were done to several plant
species at different dosages and application methods.
The result of this study showed that variation in dosage
and application method, different inoculation frequency,
and diffe rent plant species did not bring about the
different responses to the plant growth. Five months of
observation showed there were no differences in plant
growth parameters, including height, diameter, leaf
numbers, dry weight of plants, soil P content, an d
chlorophyll content, between inoculated plants to
uninoculated plants (control). Double inoculation which
combining endophyte and mycorrhiza was done to
obtain a better result. However, the double inoculation
method did not significantly affect the growth of nyatoh
and sengon in the nursery. The summary of the
inoculation test presented in Table 1.
Tabl e 1. Plant response to endophyte inoculation.
Plant species
Research
Treatment
Growth performance
H eigh t
Diamet er
Leaf number
Biomass
P
Gerunggang
(Cratoxylon glaucum)
Root
inoculation
Pos itive neutral neutral neutral Negative
Leaf drop
inoculation
Pos itive
neutral
neutral
neutral
Negative
Belangeran
(Shorea belangeran)
5 ml, once
neutral
neutral
neutral
neutral
na
5 ml, twice
neutral
neutral
neutral
neutral
na
3 ml, once
neutral
neutral
neutral
neutral
na
3 ml, twice
neutral
neutral
neutral
neutral
na
1 ml, once
neutral
neutral
neutral
neutral
na
1 ml, twice
neutral
neutral
neutral
neutral
na
Gerunggang
(Cratoxylon glaucum)
5 ml, once
neutral
neutral
neutral
neutral
na
5 ml, twice
neutral
neutral
neutral
neutral
na
3 ml, once
neutral
neutral
neutral
neutral
na
3 ml, twice
neutral
neutral
neutral
neutral
na
1 ml, once
neutral
neutral
neutral
neutral
na
1 ml, twice
neutral
neutral
neutral
neutral
na
Ramin
(Gonystylus
bancanus)
5 ml, once
neutral
neutral
neutral
neutral
na
5 ml, twice
neutral
neutral
neutral
neutral
na
3 ml, once
neutral
neutral
neutral
neutral
na
3 ml, twice
neutral
neutral
neutral
neutral
na
1 ml, once
neutral
neutral
neutral
neutral
na
1 ml, twice
neutral
neutral
neutral
neutral
na
*neutral: non-significant result compare to control ; *na: data not available
The "formulation" refers to the laboratory or
industrial process of unifying the carrier with the
microbial s train . "Inoculant" refers to the final product
of formu lation containing a carrie r and microbial agent
or consortium of microorganis ms. Formulation became
the last stage of this multi-year research. In this stage,
2
BIO Web of Conferences 20, 03005 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/20202003005
ICWEB 2019
Fig ure 1. Phy logenetic tree of isolated endophy tic fungi of
peat-swamp forest in Central Kalimantan.
Fig ure 2. Clear zone in PVK media indicated fungal ability
to solubilize phosphate.
Investigating the ability of isolated endophytic fungi
acted as a plant growth enhancer in vivo became the
ma in aim of the second year research. Liquid fungi
inoculants were inoculated to plant in the greenhouse.
After a 12 week observation, endophytic fungi
inoculation on Gerunggang (Cratoxylon glaucum)
seedlings significantly affected the height but not the
plant diameter gro wth and leaf numbers. To achieve a
better understanding of plant responses to endophyte
fungi, inoculation tests were done to several plant
species at different dosages and application methods.
The result of this study showed that variation in dosage
and application method, different inoculation frequency,
and diffe rent plant species did not bring about the
different responses to the plant growth. Five months of
observation showed there were no differences in plant
growth parameters, including height, diameter, leaf
numbers, dry weight of plants, soil P content, an d
chlorophyll content, between inoculated plants to
uninoculated plants (control). Double inoculation which
combining endophyte and mycorrhiza was done to
obtain a better result. However, the double inoculation
method did not significantly affect the growth of nyatoh
and sengon in the nursery. The summary of the
inoculation test presented in Table 1.
Tabl e 1. Plant response to endophyte inoculation.
Plant species
Research
Treatment
Growth performance
H eigh t
Diamet er
Leaf number
Biomass
P
Gerunggang
(Cratoxylon glaucum)
Root
inoculation
Pos itive
neutral
neutral
neutral
Negative
Leaf drop
inoculation
Pos itive
neutral
neutral
neutral
Negative
Belangeran
(Shorea belangeran)
5 ml, once
neutral
neutral
neutral
neutral
na
5 ml, twice
neutral
neutral
neutral
neutral
na
3 ml, once
neutral
neutral
neutral
neutral
na
3 ml, twice
neutral
neutral
neutral
neutral
na
1 ml, once
neutral
neutral
neutral
neutral
na
1 ml, twice
neutral
neutral
neutral
neutral
na
Gerunggang
(Cratoxylon glaucum)
5 ml, once
neutral
neutral
neutral
neutral
na
5 ml, twice
neutral
neutral
neutral
neutral
na
3 ml, once
neutral
neutral
neutral
neutral
na
3 ml, twice
neutral
neutral
neutral
neutral
na
1 ml, once
neutral
neutral
neutral
neutral
na
1 ml, twice
neutral
neutral
neutral
neutral
na
Ramin
(Gonystylus
bancanus)
5 ml, once
neutral
neutral
neutral
neutral
na
5 ml, twice
neutral
neutral
neutral
neutral
na
3 ml, once
neutral
neutral
neutral
neutral
na
3 ml, twice
neutral
neutral
neutral
neutral
na
1 ml, once
neutral
neutral
neutral
neutral
na
1 ml, twice
neutral
neutral
neutral
neutral
na
*neutral: non-significant result compare to control ; *na: data not available
The "formulation" refers to the laboratory or
industrial process of unifying the carrier with the
microbial s train . "Inoculant" refers to the final product
of formu lation containing a carrie r and microbial agent
or consortium of microorganis ms. Formulation became
the last stage of this multi-year research. In this stage,
three different carriers. such as sawdust, rice bran, and
peat soil, were tested to find out what is the best carrier
for P .citrinum. Observation of fungal viability indicated
that P. citrinum did not growth optimally on these
carriers (Hakim et al. unpublished)
3 Limitation in Endophyte Study and
Application
In general, the three years (2015-2017) of the
inoculation study of endophytic fungi on tree seedling
showed that the results were ranging from negative to
neutral (Table 1). This study contributed to the
amb iguity and uncertainty effect of the application of
endophyte fungi to plant growth. Moreover, p lan t
responses to endophytic fungi are generally negative
[16]. It was also noted th at the variability in describing
plant response to endophyte inoculation [16] . The s tudy
of the endophytic fungi defines that in the plant-fungus
interaction, comple x environ mental parameters affect
the interaction [17 ]. The study revealed that the highes t
colonization was found in secondary forests compared
to the open area. This difference colonization
percentage caused by several environmental parameters
including microclimate (humidity, water level, soil
nutrition, etc.) and habitat condition. Humidity and
rainfa ll have an important role in determining the
percentage of endophytic foliar colonization [18].
Several assumptions may clarify the reasons of
endophytic fungi to be less optimal on plants. First,
inoculated endophytic fungi have difficulty competing
with native endophytic fungi in a plant. According to
[19] Suryanarayanan (2012 ), endophytes have
properties that are not easy to infect other types of
leaves due to the presence of several microbial
communities such as native endophytes in these plants,
bacteria, etc. Also, the presence of the uncultured fungi
th a t exis t in s ide p lant t is sue could be a competitor to
endophytic fungi. Second, the presence of secondary
metabolites also affects the endophytic inoculation
process [19].
To increase the effectiveness and feasibility of
endophytic fungi as a plant growth enhancer,
endophytic fungi were formu lated with a carrier so that
it can be used as biological fe rtilizer. The formulation
result during this study showed that the abilit y of the
fungi decreased after 4-week storage. Storage affected
the viability of the fungi. Fo r e xa mp le , Bauveria
bassiana fungus was influenced by several factors such
as fungal species, carrier properties, storage temperature,
and incubation time [ 20]. A better formulation is
needed to make a good biofertilizer. Inputs of
technology such as drying method, fluid bed drying
method, and nano biofertilizer, can be required to
increase the quality of fungal based biofertilizer.
The endophyte study remains many questions as
follows: dosage, whether endophyte general or specific
fungal type, application method, etc. Despite many
references that presented data on the advantage of
endophyte fungi, most of the research still co nferred
data on a laboratory scale. Th ere fo re, research on the
endophytic fungi in plants on the application scale still
needs to be done and developed.
4 Conclusion
1. Penicillium citrinum showed the capability to
produce clear zones in Pikovskhaya agar which
indicated its ability to solubilize phosphate.
2. After 12 weeks of observation, the result showed
that inoculation of endophyte Penicillumcitrinum
isolate P3.10 on gerunggang (Cratoxylon
glaucum) seedlings performed a significant effect
on seedling height .
3. Different plant species, dosage, inoculation
methods, formu lation caused different effects on
tree seedling. As an exa mple: inoculation of
endophyte P. citrinum isolate P3.10 showed a
positive effect on Ge ronggang height. However, in
merapat seedling, there was no significant
difference between inoculated and uninoculated
s ee d ling
4. Biofertilizer made fro m Penicillium citrinum in
three different carriers (rice barn, sawdust, and
peat soil) can be stored only for a maximu m of 28
days th at in d icat ed th e difficu lties o f b io fert i li ze r
formulation, handling, and storage.
References
1. Bayman P., In K. CP and D . IS (Eds .),
Environmental and Microbial Relationships, 2nd
Edition, 2 13–227, Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-
Verlag, (2007)
2. M. S, Khan, , A. Zaid i, , M. Ahemad, M.Oves , and
P. A W a ni, Arch . Agron. and Soil Sci., 56, 1, 73–98,
(2010)
3. Q. Liu , , A. J. Parsons, H.Xue, K. Fras er, G. D.
Ryan, J.A. Newman, & S. Ras mu ssen, Funct. Eco l . ,
25, 910–920, (2011)
4. A. F. Mau lana, M. Turjaman, and Y. Hashimoto, J.
Exp. Agric. Int., 18(5), 1–11. (2017)
5. J. Rudgers, T. E.M ille r, S. M. Z ielg e r, and K. D.
Craven, Ecol., 93, 3, 565–574, (2012).
6. V. Novas , L. J. M. Iannone, A. M. Godeas, , and D.
Cabral, Mycol. Prog., 8 (1), 75–81, (2009).
7. A. H. Fouda, S. E. Hassan, A. M. Eid, and E. E.
Ewa is , Annals Ag ric . Sci., 60, 1, 95–104 (2015)
8. B. F. La u , N. Abdullah, N. A minudin, H. Boon, and
P. J. Jean, Ethnopharmacol., 169, 441–458, (2015)
9. S. S. N. Maharachchikumbura, G. Lian g -Dong, E.
Chukeatirote, A. H. Ba h ka l i, and K. D. Hyde,
Fungal Divers., 50, 167–187. (2011).
10. T. S . Suryanarayanan, V. Gopalan, R. U. Shaanker,
G. Ravikanth, and A. Sengupta, In J. de Azedevo &
M. Quecine (Eds.), Diversity and Benefits of
Microorganism from the Tropics, 342–365, Springer
International Medicine, (2017)
3
BIO Web of Conferences 20, 03005 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/20202003005
ICWEB 2019
11. S. Ku mar , N. Kaushik, R. Edrada-Eb e l, R. Ebe l, and
P. Proksch, In A. Ciancio & K. Mukerji (Eds.),
Integrated Management of Diseases Caused by
Fungi, Phytoplasma and Bacteria, 36 5–387),
Dordrecht, Springer Science Business Media, (2008)
12. E. Li, L. Guo, C. Academy, H. Zhang, and Y. C.
Be ijing, Bioorg. & Med. Chem., 16, 7894–78 99,
(2008)
13. S. S. Hakim, S. W. Budi, and M. J. Turjaman, Man.
Hutan Trop., 21, 138–146, (2015).
14. S. A. Khan, M . Hamayun, H. Yoon, H-Y. Ki m, S.-J.
Suh, S-K. Hwang, I-J. K i m, Y-S. Lee , U-H. Yoon,
W.S. Choo, B-M. Kong, and J.-G. Lee, BMC
Microbiol., 8, 231, (2008)
15. L. Gasoni, and B. S. D. E.Gu rf in ke l, Mycol. Res.,
101(7): 867–870, (1997)
16. M. S.May erh ofer, G. Kernaghan, and K. A. Harp er,
Mycorr., 23(2):119–128, (2012)
17. S.S . Hak im, T. W. Yu wa t i, and S.J. Nurulita,
Wetland Env. Man., 5(1): 10–17, (2017)
18. K. Saikkonen, Fungal Biol. Rev., 21(2–3): 67–74,
(2007)
19. T. S. Suryanarayanan, Fungal Diversity, 54, 19–3 0,
(2012)
20. P.K Sahu, and G. Bramaprakash, In D. P. Singh, R.
Prabha, and H. B. Sing h ( Eds .), Microbial
Inoculants in Sustainable Agricultural Productivity,
179–198, Sprin ger In d iam New Delhi, (2016).
4
BIO Web of Conferences 20, 03005 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/20202003005
ICWEB 2019