Content uploaded by Chigoziri Ekhuemelo
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Chigoziri Ekhuemelo on Jun 02, 2020
Content may be subject to copyright.
Available via license: CC BY 4.0
Content may be subject to copyright.
GSC Biological and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2020, 11(02), 250–256
Available online at GSC Online Press Directory
GSC Biological and Pharmaceutical Sciences
e-ISSN: 2581-3250, CODEN (USA): GBPSC2
Journal homepage: https://www.gsconlinepress.com/journals/gscbps
Corresponding author: Ekhuemelo Chigoziri Phone no: +234(0)7031332667; email:
Copyright © 2020 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article. This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Liscense 4.0.
(RESEARCH ART I C L E )
Pathogenicity of fungi associated with leaf spot disease of sweet potato (Ipomea
batatas L. (Lam) in Makurdi, Benue State, Nigeria.
Ekhuemelo Chigoziri * and Nsobundu Chikwado Mariagoretti
Department of Crop and Environmental Protection, Federal University of Agriculture, P.M.B. 2373 Makurdi, Benue State,
Nigeria.
Publication history: Received on 14 May 2020; revised on 22 May 2020; accepted on 24 May 2020
Article DOI: https://doi.org/10.30574/gscbps.2020.11.2.0140
Abstract
The screen house experiment was conducted to determine the pathogenicity of leaf spot fungi of sweet potato in
Makurdi situated in the Southern Guinea Savannah of Nigeria. The experiment was a completely randomized design
with twelve replicates. The variability in pathogenicity of four leaf spot fungi namely: Aspergillus flavus (Link),
Aspergillus tamarii (Kita), Macrophomina phaseolina (Tassi), and Fusarium verticillioides (Sacc.) on sweet potato
variety TIS-3164 was evaluated in the screen house using the spore suspension of the fungi at 15x 106 spores/ ml on
four weeks old plants. All four isolates were pathogenic and induced necrotic symptoms on sweet potato plants. The
leaf spot lesions were widest in sweet potato plants inoculated with A. tamarii (9 cm) followed by F. verticollioides (5
cm), A. flavus (4 cm) and M. phaseolina (3.20 cm). Sweet potato plants inoculated with spore suspension of the test fungi
recorded significantly (P < 0.05) lower number of leaves with sweet potato plants inoculated with F. verticillioides
recording the least number of leaves (30.75). At 4weeks after planting (WAP), the application of the spore suspension
of A. tamarii produced significantly lower leaf area of 5.56cm2. At 4 weeks after inoculation (WAI), percentage leaf
defoliation was highest on sweet potato plants inoculated with A. flavus (44.50 %) and least when sweet potato plants
were inoculated with M. phaseolina (34.30 %). The inoculation of the sweet potato plants with all test fungi had no
significant effect on the vine length. The study demonstrated the pathogenicity of all four test fungi on sweet potato.
Keywords: Pathogenicity; Sweet potato; Leaf spot; Lesion; Symptoms.
1. Introduction
Sweet potato (Ipomea batatas L. (Lam) is a nutritive root crop popularly cultivated in the Southern and Northern Guinea
Savannah agro ecology of Nigeria. Nigeria is ranked the third largest producer of sweet potato after China and Uganda.
Nigeria cultivated 2.5% of the sweet potatoes produced in 2010 with per capita annual consumption of 22.3 Kg [1, 2].
Nigeria is the largest producer of sweet potato in West Africa with 4 million hectares cultivated and 23534 hg/ha yield
in 2018 [3]. Sweet potato production in Nigeria is a source of employment which has a good profit margin and
contributes to farmers’ income [4]. Sweet potato production in Nigeria and Benue State in particular is a competitive
and profitable enterprise supporting the rural farmers [5, 6]. Sweet potato is classified as a low glycemic crop suitable
in the diet of the diabetic [7, 8]. Fresh sweet potato tuber contains about 80% non-starch carbohydrate, 8- 29% starch,
2.4% protein and 1.38 % mineral matter. One hundred milligrams of sweet potato tuber contains 26.25 mg ascorbic
acid, 31.20 mg Phosphorus, 16.50 mg Calcium, 0.0078 mg carotene and 0.56 mg niacin [9].
The sweet potato tuber is consumed by boiling and eating with stew, drying and milling into flour, roasting, frying into
chips, pounding and eating with soup or made into pottage or fermented to make a local drink ‘kunu’ [10]. It is used in
the production of starch syrup, beverages and yoghurt in China and Japan [4]. Sweet potato is also used as raw material
Ekhuemelo and Nsobundu/ GSC Biological and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2020, 11(02), 250–256
251
in the pharmaceutical and food industries for making drugs, candy, noodles, ethanol and as bio-fuel [2, 8]. The leaves
are dried and fermented into silage and used as animal feed [4].
The production of sweet potato is constrained by the incidence of leaf spot diseases which reduces the photosynthetic
area and consequently reduces yield [2, 11]. Several fungi have been reported to be causal agent of sweet potato leaf
spot in the rain forest zone of Nigeria and elsewhere in the world [11]. There is dearth of information on the fungi
inciting sweet potato leaf spot in Benue State in the Southern Guinea Savannah agro-ecological zone of Nigeria. There is
the need to identify these fungi and determine their pathogenicity on sweet potato. The study was conducted to
determine the pathogenicity of four leaf spot fungi isolated from sweet potato in Makurdi, Nigeria.
2. Material and methods
2.1. Isolation of Test Fungi from infected Sweet potato leaves
Infected sweet potato leaves showing characteristic leaf spot from an infected sweet potato field in the Teaching and
Research Farm of the Federal University of Agriculture, Makurdi, Benue State, Nigeria (latitude 7o41’ N - 7o45’ N and
longitude 8o35’ E - 8o37’ E 98 m above sea level) were collected and packaged in paper bags to the Pathology Laboratory
of the Federal University of Agriculture, Makurdi, Nigeria for isolation of leaf spot fungi. Two millimetres long sections
of the sweet potato leaves excised from the margins of necrotic leaf spot were sterilized for one minute in 10 %
commercial Sodium hypochlorite solution after which they were rinsed in three changes of sterile distilled water (SDW)
and blotted dry on sterile filter papers.
Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA) was prepared by adding 39g in 1 litre of SDW in a conical flask. The flask was autoclaved
at 121oC for 15 minutes. After autoclaving, the media was allowed to cool to about 40oC and Streptomycin Sulphate was
added at the rate of 0.2g/L. The media was then poured in 9cm Petri dishes and allowed to solidify. The leaf tissues were
plated on PDA. The plates were then incubated on the laboratory bench at ambient conditions of light and temperature
(30 ± 2oC) for 7 days. Pure culture was obtained by sub culturing unto fresh PDA plates.
Microscopic examination was done by examining the colony characteristics. A sterile needle was used in taking a little
portion of the hyphae containing spores on the sterile glass slide stained with lactophenol cotton blue and examined
under the microscope for fungal structures. Pure cultures were identified using compound microscope and compared
with reference manual [12].
The cultures were further confirmed at the Germplasm Health Unit of the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture
(IITA) Ibadan, Nigeria.
2.2. Pathogenicity of fungi associated with sweet potato leaf spot
The pathogenicity of the isolated fungi was conducted at the screen house situated at the Teaching and Research Farms
of the Federal University of Agriculture, Makurdi. The experiment involved micro plots which consisted of 30 cm x 15
cm x 0.3 cm black polythene bags filled with 11 kg of heat sterilized sandy loam soil collected from the Teaching and
Research Farm of the Federal University of Agriculture, Makurdi. Twenty five centimeter (25 cm) vine length of sweet
potato variety TIS-3164 sourced from National Root Crops Research Institute Umudike, Nigeria with at least three nodes
per vine was planted at 45o in each micro plot and maintained in the screen house at a temperature of 34oC – 39oC and
relative humidity of 51 % -75 % for four weeks before inoculation.
2.3. Preparation and application of inoculum
The inocula were prepared from seven day old pure cultures of each test fungi on PDA using the method adopted from
[11]. Spore suspensions were obtained by flooding the plates with 20 ml SDW and dislodging the spores with a sterile
glass rod. The spore suspension were made up to 200 ml, filtered through double layer cheesecloth and centrifuged at
180 rpm for 10 minutes. The spore concentration was determined using a haemocytometer.
The four weeks old sweet potato plants were inoculated by spraying the spore suspension (15x106spores/ ml) of each
isolate using a hand sprayer to run off. The control plants were un-inoculated and sprayed with sterile distilled water.
All plants were covered with moistened polythene bags for 48 hours after which they were removed. The experiment
was laid out in a completely randomized design with twelve replicates on an experimental plot size of 10 m x 5 m with
a total of 60 micro plots spaced 15 cm apart with an alley of 0.5 m. No fertilizer was applied and micro plots were kept
clean by hand pulling of weeds.
Ekhuemelo and Nsobundu/ GSC Biological and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2020, 11(02), 250–256
252
2.4. Data collection
Lesion size was obtained by measuring the average diameter of the lesion incited by each test fungi. Leaf spot lesions
on sweet potato plants were inspected and recorded weekly up to six weeks after inoculation. The leaf spot severity
assessment was done using the modified scale of 0-3 adopted from [13] and used as a criterion for virulence of each
fungal isolate.
0 = leaves without spot (non virulence).
1 = leaves with less than 5 spots (mild virulence).
2 = leaves with 5-10 spots (Moderate virulence).
3 = leaves with more than 10 spots (Severe virulence).
Ten leaves were tagged per treatment for data collection covering the period of six weeks after inoculation. Agronomic
data were recorded on number of leaves, leaf area which was the average product of the length and width of the leaves
in cm2, lesion size (diameter) and vine length at 2, 4 and 6 weeks after inoculation (WAI). Percentage leaf defoliation
was determined as the number of leaflets defoliated per plot relative to the total number of leaves per plot assessed as
a percentage. The fungi were re-isolated from the advancing leaf spots and the morphology compared with the original
cultures.
2.5. Data analysis
Data were subjected to analysis of variance using GenStat 9 th edition. Significant means were separated using Fishers
least significant difference (F-LSD) at 5% level of probability.
3. Results
Data presented in Table 1 shows the number of leaves of sweet potato plants inoculated with spore suspension of fungi
in the screen house. The number of leaves by sweet potato plants inoculated with rhe spore suspension of all four test
fungi was not significantly different at 2 WAI. At 4 WAI, sweet potato plants inoculated with A. tamarii recorded
significantly (P < 0.05) lower number of leaves (34.92) compared with the control (42.17). The number of leaves
recorded on sweet potato plants inoculated with M. phaseolina (40.08) and F. verticillioides (38.67) were not
significantly different (P > 0.05) from the control (43.17). However at 6 WAI, all sweet potato plants inoculated with
spore suspension of the test fungi recorded significantly (P < 0.05) lower number of leaves compared with the control.
Sweet potato plants inoculated with F. verticillioides recorded the least number of leaves (30.75) which was significantly
(P < 0.05) lower compared with the number of leaves recorded on plants inoculated with M. phaseolina (35.75) and A.
tamarii (36.08).
Table 1 Effect of spore suspension of test fungi on the number of leaves of Sweet Potato leaves in the Screen house.
Fungi
Number of leaves
2 WAI
4 WAI
6 WAI
Macrophomina phaseolina
34.25
40.08
35.75
Aspergillus tamarii
38.25
34.92
36.08
Aspergillus flavus
33.92
37.67
33.00
Fusarium verticillioides
36.58
38.67
30.75
Control
33.25
42.17
48.00
FLSD (0.05)
NS
4. 08
4.67
NS- Not significant
Table 2 shows the leaf area of sweet potato plants inoculated with fungi in the screen house. At 2 WAI, the application
of the spore suspension of A. tamarii produced the least leaf area of 5.56 cm2 which was significantly (P < 0.05) lower
compared with the leaf area produced by the plants inoculated with the spore suspension of all other fungi and the
control. At 4WAI, inoculation of sweet potato plants with the spore suspension of all four test fungi produced
significantly (P <0.05) lower leaf area compared with the control. Sweet potato plants inoculated with the spore
suspension of A. flavus recorded leaf area of 11.53 cm2 while those sweet potato plants inoculated with the spore
suspension of A. tamarii recorded the least leaf area of 9.31 cm2. At 6WAI, inoculation of sweet potato plants with the
spore suspension of the test fungi produced lower leaf area with similar trend as recorded at 4WAI.
Ekhuemelo and Nsobundu/ GSC Biological and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2020, 11(02), 250–256
253
Table 2 Leaf Area of Sweet Potato Plants inoculated with fungi Spore Suspension in the Screen house.
Fungi
Leaf Area (cm2)
2 WAI
4 WAI
6 WAI
Macrophomina phaseolina
6.46
10.10
16.96
Aspergillus tamarii
5.56
9.31
15.34
Aspergillus flavus
6.77
11.53
19.67
Fusarium verticillioides
6.78
11.37
18.04
Control
6.67
12.56
21.50
FLSD (0.05)
0.23
0.55
2.00
The weekly record of the lesion development of test fungi on sweet potato leaves is presented in Table 3. Leaf spots
appeared on the inoculated sweet potato leaves within three days after inoculation. In the first two weeks after
inoculation, the lesions appeared as multiple dark brown lesion spots with a diameter of 0.90 cm incited by M.
phaseolina which was significantly lower than the lesion incited by A. tamarii (4.90 cm). At 4 WAI, the lesion
development on the leaf indicated that A. tamarii recorded the highest lesion diameter of 9.00 cm while the least lesion
diameter of 3.20 cm was recorded in sweet potato leaves inoculated with M. phaseolina.
Table 3 Weekly assessment of the lesion diameter of leaf spots incited by test fungi
Fungi
Lesion size (diameter in cm)
1 WAI
2 WAI
3 WAI
4 WAI
Macrophomina phaseolina
0.90
1.60
2.20
3.20
Aspergillus tamarii
4.90
6.50
7.20
9.00
Aspergillus flavus
1.30
2.60
3.40
4.00
Fusarium verticillioides
1.80
3.70
4.10
5.00
Control
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
FLSD (0.05)
1.60
2.57
1.60
1.80
Data presented in Table 4 shows the severity rating (virulence) of isolates on sweet potato plants in the screen house.
All four isolates were pathogenic and induced necrotic symptoms on sweet potato leaves during the period of the study
compared with the un-inoculated control which had no leaf spot. Although there were no significant differences in the
severity of leaf spots incited by all test fungi, at 6WAI, leaf spot on the sweet potato plants inoculated with the spore
suspension of A. flavus recorded the highest severity score of 2.83 (severe virulence) while the least severity score was
recorded on sweet potato plants inoculated with the spore suspension of A. tamarii with a severity score of 2.42
(moderate virulence).
Table 4 Severity of leaf Spot on Sweet Potato inoculated with the spore suspension Test Fungi in the Screen house.
Fungi
Disease Severity
2 WAI
4 WAI
6 WAI
Macrophomina phaseolina
2.75
2.67
2.67
Aspergillus tamarii
2.75
2.67
2.42
Aspergillus flavus
2.92
2.75
2.83
Fusarium verticillioides
2.92
2.75
2.67
Control
0.00
0.00
0.00
FLSD (0.05)
0.30
0.38
0.44
Ekhuemelo and Nsobundu/ GSC Biological and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2020, 11(02), 250–256
254
Table 5 shows the percentage leaf defoliation of sweet potato plants inoculated with test fungi. It was observed that the
leaf spot lesions coalesced to leaf necrosis and then the leaflets were defoliated. Leaf defoliation was significantly higher
(P < 0.05) on sweet potato plants inoculated with test fungi compared with the un-inoculated control with no leaf
defoliated. At 2 WAI, Aspergillus tamarii incited highest leaf defoliation of 18.27 % followed by Fusarium verticillioides
17.82 %, Aspergillus flavus17.61 % and Macrophomina phaseolina 17.46 %. At 4WAI, percentage leaf defoliation was
highest on sweet potato plants inoculated with A. flavus (44.50 %) and least when sweet potato plants were inoculated
with M. phaseolina (34.30 %).
Table 5 Effect of Test Fungi on the Percentage Leaf defoliation of Sweet Potato Plants
Fungi
Percentage leaf defoliation
2 WAI
4 WAI
Macrophomina phaseolina
17.46
34.30
Aspergillus tamarii
18.27
37.80
Aspergillus flavus
17.61
44.50
Fusarium verticillioides
17.82
37.20
Control
0.00
0.00
FLSD(0.05)
5.26
16.03
Data presented in Table 6 shows the vine length of sweet potato plants inoculated with test fungi. All four fungi had no
significant effect on the vine length of sweet potato plants throughout the period of the experiment. At 2 WAI, the sweet
potato plants inoculated with all four fungi grew longer than the control. Sweet potato plants inoculated with A. tamarii
produced longer vines at 2 and 4 WAI while the sweet potato plants inoculated with M. phaseolina produced the longest
vine at 6 WAI.
Table 6 Vine length of sweet potato plants inoculated with Test Fungi
Fungi
Vine Length (cm)
2 WAI
4 WAI
6 WAI
Macrophomina phaseolina
115.60
159.20
179.00
Aspergillus tamarii
120.50
161.70
176.60
Aspergillus flavus
112.00
155.10
175.50
Fusarium verticillioides
108.50
145.70
174.20
Control
92.80
150.20
170.80
FLSD (0.05)
NS
NS
NS
NS= Not significant
4. Discussion
The study showed the pathogenicity of Aspergillus flavus, Macrophomina phaseolina, Aspergillus tamarii and Fusarium
verticillioides in inciting leaf spot disease on sweet potato plants. This indicates that the four test fungi are associated
with leaf spot disease on sweet potato in Makurdi, located in the Southern Guinea Savannah agro - ecological zone of
Nigeria. Previous reports identified Fusarium culmorum, Cercosporella, Cochlobolus lunatus, Fusarium lateritium, and
Fusarium solani as leaf spot pathogens of sweet potato in Rivers and Delta States in the rainforest zone of Nigeria
[11,14,15,].
The isolation and pathogenicity of A. flavus on sweet potato in this study is in contract with the report of Agu et al. [16]
which identified A. niger as inciting sweet potato rot in Awka, Nigeria. Aspergillus flavus which was pathogenic in this
study is reported to exist on decaying substrates and in the soil [17]. Fusarium verticillioides was also found to be
pathogenic in leaf spot disease of sweet potato in this present study. This corroborates the findings of [18] which
reported Fusarium species as being able to cause leaf spot infection under favourable temperature and humidity
condition. Ilondu [11] also agreed that Fusarium spp could incite leaf spot disease in a variety of plants.
Ekhuemelo and Nsobundu/ GSC Biological and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2020, 11(02), 250–256
255
Macrophomina phaseolina which was one of the least virulent in this present study have been reported as a seed and
soil fungus capable of inciting leaf spot and has a wide host range of about 500 plants where it causes necrotic symptoms
on sweet potato, cowpea, groundnut, ginger, sunflower and castor [19, 20, 21, 22 ]. Furthermore [19] noted that the
severity of M. phaseolina was directly related to the population of viable sclerotia established in the host between 24
and 48 hours of inoculation. Ndiaye et al. [22] also reported that M. phaseolina incited wilting and drying of cowpea
leaves with high incidences at temperatures greater than 36oC.
The inoculation of test fungi in this study resulted in lesion development on the leaves of sweet potato plants and
progressed to defoliate necrotic leaves over time. Similar observation was made by [23] on groundnut under natural
infection and was attributed to inoculum buildup.
Aspergillus flavus in this study initiated 44.50 % leaf defoliation on sweet potato plants. Waliyar et al. [24] reported that
leaf losses of between 25% and 43% could result in the disruption of the photosynthetic process, lesser pods and lower
fruit quality. The report of [25] associated leaf defoliation to reduced growth and photosynthetic capacity of tomato
plants. Gorbet et al. [26] reported a negative correlation between leaf lesions and leaf defoliation and yield of groundnut.
5. Conclusion
The study demonstrated the pathogenicity of all four test fungi on sweet potato leaves. Lesion diameter was highest in
sweet potato plants inoculated with A. tamarii (9.00 cm) followed by F. verticollioides ( 5.00 cm), A. flavus (4.00 cm) and
M. phaseolina (3.20 cm). The inoculation of the sweet potato plants with spore suspension of all test fungi had no
significant effect on the vine length.
Compliance with ethical standards
Acknowledgments
The authors appreciate the technologists in the Screen house of the College of Agronomy, Federal University of
Agriculture, Makurdi, Nigeria for their technical support.
Disclosure of conflict of interest
The authors declared no conflict of interest.
References
[1] Egeonu N and Akoroda MO. (2010). Sweet Potato Characterization in Nigeria. Sweet Potato Breeders’
Annual Meeting held June 22-25 in Uganda.
[2] Bergh K, Orozco P, Gugerty MK and Anderson CL. (2012). Sweet Potato Value Chain: Nigeria. Evans School
Policy Analysis Research Brief No. 220.
[3] Food and Agriculture Organization of the United States Statistics data (2018).
[4] Odebode SO, Egeonu N and Akoroda MO. (2008). Promotion of sweet potato for the food industry in Nigeria.
Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 14(3), 300-308.
[5] Ali O, Nyiatagher ZT and Udeh M.(2017). Economic Analysis of Sweet Potato Marketing in Benue State, Nigeria.
Journal of Research in Business and Management, 5(7), 41-47.
[6] Mwanja YP, Goler EE and Gugu FM. (2017). Assessment of root and vine yield of sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas
(L) Lam) landraces as influenced by plant population density in Jos- Plateau, Nigeria. International Journal of
Agricultural Research, 12(2), 88-92.
[7] Allen JC, Corbitt AD, Maloney KP, Butt MS and Truong VD. (2012). Glycemic index of sweet potato as affected by
cooking methods. The Open Nutrition Journal, 6, 1−11.
[8] Krochmal-Marczak B, Sawicka B, Supski J, Cebulak T and Paradowska K. (2014). Nutrition value of the sweet
potato (Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam) cultivated in south-eastern Polish conditions. International Journal of
Agronomy and Agriculture research, 4(4), 169 – 178.
Ekhuemelo and Nsobundu/ GSC Biological and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2020, 11(02), 250–256
256
[9] Odebode SO. (2004). Acceptability of Sweet potato “sparri” and its potentials for enhancing food security and
economic empowerment of rural women in Southwestern Nigeria. The Nigerian Journal of Rural sociology, 1 and
2, 104-112.
[10] Mbanaso EO. (2011). Adoption and disadoption of sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas (L) Lam) productionand
processing technologies by farmers in south-eastern Nigeria. Doctor of Philosophy Thesis, Department of
Agricultural Extension, University of Nigeria Nsukka, 155.
[11] Ilondu EM. (2013). Etiology and assessment of leaf spot disease of sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam) in
selected farms in Delta State, Nigeria. Agriculture and Biology Journal of North America, 4(4), 476-484.
[12] Wanatabe T. (2010). Pictorial atlas of soil and seed fungi: Morphologies of cultured fungi and key to 1 species,
3rd edition. American Phytopathology Society press, United States of America, 404.
[13] Onuegbu BA and Emiri UN. (2011). Studies on the germination and leaf spot disease controlin fluted pumpkin
(Telferiaoccidentalis) in Ndele, Rivers State, Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Plant Protection, 25(1), 139-148.
[14] Amienyo CA and Ataga AE. (2008). Survey of fungi associated with diseased sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas (L)
Lam) leaves in some farms in Rivers State, Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Botany, 21(2), 336 – 341.
[15] Ilondu EM, SM Ayodele and BK Ofere. (2010). Comparative efficacy of neem leaf extract (Azadirachta indica A.
Juss) and three commercial fungicides in control of Cercosporella leafspot of sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas
L.). Nigerian Journal of Botany, 23(1), 157- 164.
[16] Agu KC, Nweke GU, Awah NS, Okeke BC, Mgbemena ICC, Okigbo RN and Ngenegbo UC. (2015). Fungi Associated
with the Post-Harvest Loss of Sweet Potato. International Journal of Research Studies in Biosciences, 3(9),
32-37.
[17] Scheidegger KA and Payne GA. ( 2003). Unlocking the Secrets Behind Secondary Metabolism: A Review of
Aspergillus flavus from Pathogenicity to Functional Genomics. Journal of Toxicology Toxin Reviews, 22 (2 and 3),
423– 459.
[18] Goldberg NP. (2006). Fusarium leaf spot and Crown Root rot. New Mexico State University Extension Guide, 2.
[19] Khan S. (2007). Macrophomina phaseolina as causal agent for charcoal rot of sunflower. Mycopathology, 5(2),
111-118.
[20] Nair KPP. (2013). The Diseases of Ginger In: The Agronomy and Economy of Turmeric and Ginger, The invaluable
Medicinal spice crops Elsevier publisher London, 409 - 426.
[21] Claudino MR and Soares DJ. (2014). Pathogenicity and aggressiveness of Macrophomina phaseolina isolates to
castor (Ricinus communis). Tropical Plant pathology, 39(6), 1-7.
[22] Ndiaye M, Sarr MP, Cisse N and Ndoye I. (2015). Is the recently described Macrophomina pseudophaseolina
pathogenically different from Macrophomina phaseolina? African Journal of Microbiology Research, 9(45),
2232 -2238.
[23] Bwala RI, Ekhuemelo C and Zacharia D. (2018). Influence of Variety and Sowing Date on Incidence of Cercospora
Leaf Spots Disease of Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) in Makurdi, Benue State Nigeria. Asian Journal of Research
in Crop Science, 2(4), 1-10.
[24] Waliyar F, Adomou M and Traore A. (2000). Rational use of fungicide application to maximize peanut yield
under foliar disease pressure in West Africa. Plant Disease, 84, 120- 121.
[25] Iqbal N, Masood A and Khan NA. (2012). Analyzing the significance of defoliation in growth, photosynthetic
compensation and source-sink relations. Photosynthetica, 50, 161–170.
[26] Gorbet DW, Shokes FM and Jackson LF. (1982). Control of peanut leaf spot with combination of resistance and
fungicide treatment. Peanut Science, 9, 87-90.
How to cite this article
Ekhuemelo C and Nsobundu CM. (2020). Pathogenicity of fungi associated with leaf spot disease of sweet potato (Ipomea
batatas L. (Lam) in Makurdi, Benue State, Nigeria. GSC Biological and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 11(2), 250-256.
