Conference PaperPDF Available

Teachers Rock When Students Rule: Positive Attitudes Toward Learning, Not Schooling



Students’ lack of interest in school and their studies has become a disappointing issue for teachers which, according to Papert (1998), is mostly the result of a boring atmosphere in schools. Literature emphasizes the importance of nurturing students’ interest and motivation to yield better learning, regardless of the quality of teaching. Students’ positive feelings toward school can affect their rate of attendance, the quality of their involvement in class discussions and activities, and later educational achievements. Such engaging learning environments and activities can also enhance students’ adaptive abilities for future competitive work opportunities. This paper explores innovative teaching methods that enhance student interests and consequently, inspire wholehearted participation among them in elementary schools. It also introduces how teachers’ leadership in class environments can help advance adoption of innovative practices to foster more student-led learning ownership to nurture student voice.
Best Paper Award
Baharak Saadat Beheshti
Lani Fraizer
Teachers Rock, When Students Rule:
Positive Attitudes Toward Learning Not Schooling
Fall 2017 Conference
Las Vegas, Nevada, USA
Randall Valentine, Ph.D.
IOSSBR Conference Chair
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Full-text available
The changes that occurred in the Jakarta 2012 election may be seen as a change in Indonesia's social movements and election tradition. They marked a social movement with special characteristics; specifically, a ‘partisan’ movement, led by the successful Jokowi–Ahok ticket. The partisan social movement also changed the tradition of money politics, which has always coloured general and local elections in Indonesia. This paper found four main factors in Jokowi–Ahok's victory. The first was their reputations and track records of leadership and consistency, which, secondly, encouraged unpaid volunteers to motivate the public to participate in the election and vote for the pair. Thirdly, in contrast to previous social movements in Indonesia, the volunteers did not just work to overthrow the current leadership and replace it, and then distance themselves, but instead continued to monitor the candidates; some managed government directly, while others took watch dog position. Fourthly, the relationship between volunteers and local government was not necessarily oppositional. As such, they were partisan not only in that they were supporters of a pair of candidates, but also in their promotion and support of openness, anti-corruption efforts and provision of maximum public services.
Full-text available
This study explored relationships, between race, citizen participation, and three dimensions of cognitive empowerment: understandings of power through relationships, political functioning, and shaping ideology. Results revealed that, unlike emotional empowerment, cognitive empowerment was not directly related to citizen participation, and effects of participation on cognitive empowerment did not differ for African Americans and Caucasians. Importantly, a main effect of race on cognitive empowerment was found which showed that, accross levels of participation, African Americans had greater understandings of power through relationships and shaping ideology than Caucasians, Implications for empowerment theory and practice are discussed.
Aging out youth are assumed to embody a disempowered group, for whom civic engagement opportunities are rare. Utilizing a targeted initiative, this study explores individual- and community-level outcomes derived from foster youth civic engagement. Data were collected via: (1) Interview and survey research with foster youth advisory board leaders; (2) interview and survey research with civic youth workers; and, (3) non-participant observation of five foster youth advisory board meetings. Directed content analysis revealed three emergent themes, which transcended the data inductively (Opportunity through Access; Positive Conceptions of New Jersey's Department of Children and Families; and, Participatory Competence). These themes support and extend our current understanding of empowering outcomes for this population. Implications for research, policy, and practice are discussed.
Political campaigns today are won or lost in the so-called ground war--the strategic deployment of teams of staffers, volunteers, and paid part-timers who work the phones and canvass block by block, house by house, voter by voter.Ground Warsprovides an in-depth ethnographic portrait of two such campaigns, New Jersey Democrat Linda Stender's and that of Democratic Congressman Jim Himes of Connecticut, who both ran for Congress in 2008. Rasmus Kleis Nielsen examines how American political operatives use "personalized political communication" to engage with the electorate, and weighs the implications of ground-war tactics for how we understand political campaigns and what it means to participate in them. He shows how ground wars are waged using resources well beyond those of a given candidate and their staff. These include allied interest groups and civic associations, party-provided technical infrastructures that utilize large databases with detailed individual-level information for targeting voters, and armies of dedicated volunteers and paid part-timers. Nielsen challenges the notion that political communication in America must be tightly scripted, controlled, and conducted by a select coterie of professionals. Yet he also quashes the romantic idea that canvassing is a purer form of grassroots politics. In today's political ground wars, Nielsen demonstrates, even the most ordinary-seeming volunteer knocking at your door is backed up by high-tech targeting technologies and party expertise. Ground Warsreveals how personalized political communication is profoundly influencing electoral outcomes and transforming American democracy.